the regulatory tsunami rich trzupek trinity consultants, inc

17
The Regulatory Tsunami Rich Trzupek Trinity Consultants, Inc.

Upload: douglas-morton

Post on 17-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

The Regulatory TsunamiRich TrzupekTrinity Consultants, Inc.

“In 2010, total U.S. greenhouse gas emissions were 6,865.5 Tg or million metric tons CO2 Eq. Total U.S. emissions have increased by 11.0 percent from 1990 to 2010…”

Source: USEPA DRAFT INVENTORY OF U.S. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS AND SINKS: 1990 – 2010 – Executive Summary

“In 2010, total U.S. greenhouse gas emissions were 6,865.5 Tg or million metric tons CO2 Eq. Total U.S. emissions have increased by 11.0 percent from 1990 to 2010…”

Source: USEPA DRAFT INVENTORY OF U.S. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS AND SINKS: 1990 – 2010 – Executive Summary

GHG Reductions Continue• Directly Targeted Regulations & Programs• GHG Permitting & Limits• Regional Programs• Renewable Portfolio Standards• Renewable Subsidies/Grants/Other Wastes of Money

• Indirectly Targeted Regulations• Ambient Air Standards• Industrial and Utility Boiler Rules• Aggressive Enforcement

Coal BAD! Gas Good

GHG Permitting

• Targets plants with 100,000 tpy CO2e emissions or more• Roughly a 10 MW coal plant or larger• VERY small in power generation world

• Plants must use “Best Available Control Technology” to reduce GHG emissions

• Detailed guidance to permit authorities

RIPCOAL

300,000,000 BC to 2012 AD

GHG Limits

• 1,000 lbs CO2e/MW Generated• Combined cycle gas can do• Coal can not

• EPA dances around Clean Air Act• 30 year averaging!• Ignores financial reality

RIPCOAL

You Kept UsWarm

Regional Programs• Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (East Coast)• Trading Program – active since 2009

• Midwest Greenhouse Gas Reduction Accord (Midwest)• Western Climate Initiative (West Coast)• More regional trading on the way?

RIPCOAL

We Dead Dinos

Renewable Portfolio Standards

RPS Examples

State RPS Target Target YearGHG Reduced

(tpy)

California 33% 2025 50,500,000

Illinois 25% 2026 37,800,000

Michigan 10% 2015 8,400,000

Ohio 25% 2025 27,000,000

Texas 7% 2015 21,700,000

Why Subsidies?Co

st

Reliability

Nuclear

Coal

Gas

Wind

Solar

Obama’s Energy Policy

I’m bound to finda parachute somewhere….

New Ambient Air Regs.• National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) define “clean

air”• A moving target• Keeps EPA, enviros and consultants in business• Big projects must model to show compliance

• New short term Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) NAAQS• VERY stringent• Coal plants can’t meet

• New short term Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) NAAQS• VERY stringent• Compliance by modeling, NOT monitoring!• Coal plants, refineries are targets

New Boiler Rules• Boiler MACT• Targets industrial boilers• Stated goal: reduce toxic emissions• Real goal: stick it to coal

• Unrealistic emissions limits• Energy efficiency requirements• Will hurt manufacturing

• Utility MACT• Targets utility boilers• Stated goal: reduce toxic emissions• Real goal: (see Boiler MACT)

• Both rules put EPA in the control room for first time

Enforcement• Small coal boilers targeted too• Option 1: switch to biomass• Option 2: shut down• Option 3: enforcement

• As rules pile on, enforcement opportunities grow• Less environmental return• BUT – keeps $ flowing in to EPA

Result• 50 – 80 GW of Coal Plant Retirements over next ~5 years• Natural Gas fired turbines to fill most of gap• Solar/Wind can’t be base-loaded• Natural Gas meets GHG standards• Natural Gas plants can be built quickly• Much more GHG reductions – 500,000,000 tons +

• Natural Gas VERY cheap now, but:• Prices historically not as stable as coal• Current glut will create demand• Increased shale gas regulation can affect price

• Grid stability issues?• Unlikely – cost certainty the bigger issue

Thank you!