the property planning competition · web view2013 schools property planning competition the namoi...

44
2013 SCHOOLS PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION The Namoi Catchment Management Authority Schools Property Planning Competition is here again in 2013. With the contributions of sponsors and assistance from many other organisations, this competition will again be an excellent opportunity for school students across the North West Region. The winning entries will be the ones that produce the most realistic and useful property plans for sustainable management of the host property this year, “Waitara”. Winner and runner up individuals and teams (plus their teachers) will be presented with prizes in a special ceremony at Ag-Quip 2013. Timetable for 2013 Monday 26 th February: Property Planning Competition Launch Monday 26 th February: Resources sent on a CD and will be available on the web at www.namoi.cma.nsw.gov.au Tuesday 22 nd March: Field Day at “Waitara” Gunnedah 7 th – 13 th March: Tutorials in schools around the catchment. Monday 27 th May: The two best entries per class due for marking. Post to: Col Easton, Namoi CMA, P.O. Box 528, Tamworth NSW 2340 Wednesday 21 st August: Award Ceremony at Ag-Quip, Gunnedah Disclaimer This manual has been prepared by Col Easton, Angela Baker, Simon Turpin, George Truman and Corie Taylor of the Namoi 1/44

Upload: others

Post on 01-Apr-2020

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: THE PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION · Web view2013 SCHOOLS PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION The Namoi Catchment Management Authority Schools Property Planning Competition is here again

2013 SCHOOLS PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION

The Namoi Catchment Management Authority Schools Property Planning Competition is here again in 2013. With the contributions of sponsors and assistance from many other organisations, this competition will again be an excellent opportunity for school students across the North West Region.

The winning entries will be the ones that produce the most realistic and useful property plans for sustainable management of the host property this year, “Waitara”. Winner and runner up individuals and teams (plus their teachers) will be presented with prizes in a special ceremony at Ag-Quip 2013.

Timetable for 2013Monday 26th February: Property Planning Competition Launch

Monday 26th February: Resources sent on a CD and will be available on the web at www.namoi.cma.nsw.gov.au

Tuesday 22nd March: Field Day at “Waitara” Gunnedah

7th – 13th March: Tutorials in schools around the catchment.

Monday 27th May: The two best entries per class due for marking. Post to: Col Easton, Namoi CMA, P.O. Box 528, Tamworth NSW 2340

Wednesday 21st August: Award Ceremony at Ag-Quip, Gunnedah

DisclaimerThis manual has been prepared by Col Easton, Angela Baker, Simon Turpin, George Truman and Corie Taylor of the Namoi Catchment Management Authority for the purposes of the 2013 Schools Property Planning Competition. Information included in this manual may be fictitious to be used only as part of the competition.

Namoi Catchment Management Authority accepts no responsibility for any person acting on, or relying on, or upon any opinion, advice, representation, statement or information expressed or implied in or from the manual.

1/27

Page 2: THE PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION · Web view2013 SCHOOLS PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION The Namoi Catchment Management Authority Schools Property Planning Competition is here again

ContentsINTRODUCTION FOR TEACHERS...........................................................................3DEVELOPING YOUR PROPERTY PLAN.................................................................4PROPERTY INFORMATION – ‘WAITARA’.............................................................5

1. History and Current Enterprises..........................................................................52. Landholder’s Goals.............................................................................................6

STOCKTAKE OF RESOURCES..................................................................................71. Land Use, Maps and Measuring Area.................................................................72. Contours and Drainage........................................................................................73. Current Infrastructure and Water Resources.......................................................74. Soil Landscapes...................................................................................................85. Soil Salinity.......................................................................................................106. Land Capability Classes....................................................................................117. Vegetation and Habitat Areas...........................................................................128. Climate..............................................................................................................129. Aboriginal Cultural Heritage.............................................................................14

Photos from ‘Waitara’..................................................................................................15MANAGING THE RESOURCES...............................................................................16

1. Specific Issues...................................................................................................162. Legal Obligations..............................................................................................17

PUTTING THE PLAN TOGETHER..........................................................................181. Specific Works..................................................................................................182. Management Recommendations.......................................................................193. Monitoring.........................................................................................................20

THE PLAN AND REPORT.........................................................................................211. The Physical Plan..............................................................................................212. The Report.........................................................................................................21

EXTRA RESOURCES................................................................................................221. Expertise............................................................................................................222. Funding Opportunities......................................................................................223. Other relevant organisations and websites........................................................22

APPENDIX I: MARKING SCHEDULE.....................................................................23APPENDIX II: THE DOT GRID................................................................................24APPENDIX III: VEGETATION SPECIES EXPECTED AT ‘Waitara’.....................26APPENDIX IV: Cover page template..........................................................................27

2/27

Page 3: THE PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION · Web view2013 SCHOOLS PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION The Namoi Catchment Management Authority Schools Property Planning Competition is here again

INTRODUCTION FOR TEACHERSThe Property Planning Competition is designed to give students an opportunity to study a local rural property in detail. The students are required to prepare a plan that provides for long term profitability as well as sustaining the natural resources of the area.

The exercise draws together a number of land management themes and gives students the chance to apply their skills and knowledge to a real-life situation. The field day on Tuesday March 5 will provide an opportunity for students to participate in a range of activities and to engage with relevant government and industry experts.

TutorialsAfter the field day, Namoi CMA staff will run tutorials at schools around the catchment. The aim of the tutorial is to help students learn and produce the best property plan they can.

Please contact Col Easton by email: [email protected] or ph: 6764 5940 fax: 6764 5995 for more information.

Syllabus LinksThe Schools Property Planning Competition has been designed to address numerous outcomes of TAFE Agriculture courses, the School Certificate and HSC Agriculture syllabus, particularly the Farm Case Study unit. Links can also be made to the HSC Geography syllabus and the VET Primary Industries curriculum.

Because the activity has been structured to accommodate students studying a range of subjects and abilities, teachers will need to determine the depth of study undertaken. A marking schedule is provided in Appendix I, which will be used to judge entries submitted.

Getting StartedResources provided are sufficient for students to work in small groups or individually. All material will print out clearly in black and white, but colour may make some things clearer. Each student group should be given a copy of the relevant chapters and maps available. In addition, students should access other resources from libraries, government departments or the Internet (suggested websites are included throughout this document).

To participate in the Schools Property Planning Competition you need to: Download the manual, maps and other information from Namoi CMA’s website or

the CD provided to your school Follow the prompts at: www.namoi.cma.nsw.gov.au Attend the fully paid for field day at Waitara on 5th March 2013 Attend one of the tutorials in March (optional) Include a cover page for each entry with the name of your school, class name and

all contributing students’ names clearly marked. See Appendix IV for a template. Only send the best two entries per class to Namoi CMA by 27th May 2013

3/27

Page 4: THE PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION · Web view2013 SCHOOLS PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION The Namoi Catchment Management Authority Schools Property Planning Competition is here again

DEVELOPING YOUR PROPERTY PLANProperty planning aids the landholder to match production systems on the property to its level of capability to assure future productivity and sustainability. When land is used beyond its capability it causes resource degradation and thereafter has reduced ability to support production, conversely if land is used below its potential the opportunity for greater production is being wasted. Property Planning aims to help the landholder to manage their resources and address environmental issues in a methodical and logical manner.

Property planning enables us to plan for not only the management of stock, irrigated and dryland crops and other farm enterprises such as ecotourism but also for soils, paddocks, trees, wildlife, water supply and other resources that make up a property.

Financial considerations will often be the deciding factors in determining what can be achieved in a property plan. As the major aim is to produce a practical physical plan, profitability and funding sources should be considered and described in the final report but only broad terms.

The final property plan should: Take into account natural characteristics of the land, water and vegetation Minimise land and water degradation by the identification of existing and

possible problem areas and adapting management Be aware of social, legal and economic aspects Optimise profitability of enterprises Consider broader environmental issues – for example what are surrounding

landholders doing? What is happening in the catchment?

For the purposes of this competition, the scenario is that you are a team of farm advisory consultants that have been contracted to undertake a property plan.

The QuestionYour task is to use the principles of physical property planning to plan the sustainable and profitable development of the case study farm “Waitara”.

You need to develop a map of the property, where you will mark on your suggested improvements such as infrastructure and new management practices. To accompany your map, provide a report that describes the management practices you believe should be implemented on the farm over the next 5 – 10 years and justify the decisions you have made on your plan.

To be eligible to enter the competition you are required to submit a: Physical plan (the map with your recommendations marked) A report to go with the map explaining the recommendations you have made Cover page with all of the details required (names, class, school)

More information is included later in this document.

4/27

Page 5: THE PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION · Web view2013 SCHOOLS PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION The Namoi Catchment Management Authority Schools Property Planning Competition is here again

PROPERTY INFORMATION – ‘WAITARA’The following section outlines the information relevant to ‘Waitara’ that you will need to take into account when undertaking your plan. It includes information on the history of the property, the aims of the landholder, and a physical stock take of the property.

Conducting a physical stock take of the property is a key element in developing a property management plan. By examining a farm thoroughly you will see a complete picture of the current state of its resources, and how best to use these resources in the future. Some factors cannot easily be changed (e.g. climate and soils) while others can be (e.g. land use and fence lines).

Information in this section should be used in conjunction with the maps provided. Also included are key points you will have to consider when developing your plan.

1. History and Current Enterprises‘Waitara’ is a 292 hectare property approximately 20kms from Gunnedah towards Mullaley. It was purchased by the Honner family in 2008. Currently the property has 46 cow and calf breeders along with a stock horse breeding enterprise.

The cattle are rotated around the property according to feed and stock water availability. Currently all of the paddocks are regenerated native perennial and annual grass with the last cropping taking place in 2008. The property has had a long history of cropping with much of this area being first cropped in the early 1900’s. There are scalded areas and topsoil loss in the steeper areas of the property which could be attributed to traditional cropping methods over long periods of time.

With this cropping history, most of the property has been contoured and waterways constructed in the 1970’s. These earthworks are in a fairly stable condition and no major repairs are required at the moment.

A number of established native tree blocks and lines were planted around 10-12 years ago and a small area of saltbush planting in a salinity outbreak area (planted in 1996) which is marked on the map. There are some weed issues with African Box Thorne, Roly Poly, Skeleton Weed, Purpletop and Galvanised Burr having the biggest impact on production.

The existing fences marked on the MAP are in stock proof condition but it is obvious that there have been other fences on the property but are now no longer in stock proof condition. With large paddocks and insufficient stock water, it is difficult to utilise pasture and manage stock.

Currently stock water provision is relied upon by dams throughout the property. There is a 10,000 gallon tank on the top of the hill not being used and there is also a bore, windmill and tanks in the middle of the property but are not currently in working order.

There is a homestead on the property in which the owners live with a number of small sheds. The cattle yards are located close to the sheds and are in good working order. There are good access tracks to most parts of the property.

5/27

Page 6: THE PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION · Web view2013 SCHOOLS PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION The Namoi Catchment Management Authority Schools Property Planning Competition is here again

The main challenges on this property are:

the landholders time – working full time off farm provision of water for stock seasonal feed value and availability shade and shelter for stock control of erosion and scalded areas control of salinity selecting appropriate grazing and or cropping enterprises

These challenges should be addressed in the property plan.

2. Landholder’s GoalsWhile property plans may be based purely on the physical resources of a catchment, it is the landholder who will implement the plan. It is therefore desirable that any plan not only accounts for the physical factors within the catchment but also the aims of the landholder.

The goals of the owners of ‘Waitara’ are to:

Increase productivity of the cattle enterprise

Improve pasture quality and quantity (including having a mix of types of pastures and provision of seasonal shortages)

Implement a fencing and stock water infrastructure plan

Manage the natural resources of the property such as native vegetation areas and increasing groundcover on the scalded areas

Low labour intensity if possible so off farm work can still be undertaken

6/27

Page 7: THE PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION · Web view2013 SCHOOLS PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION The Namoi Catchment Management Authority Schools Property Planning Competition is here again

STOCKTAKE OF RESOURCES1. Land Use, Maps and Measuring AreaCurrent landuse on Waitara is predominately native perennial and annual grasses used for grazing.

You have been provided with a series of maps to print and undertake your property planning. The north arrow, property boundary and scale are displayed on each map.

The following information in Table 1 can be used as a guide to calculate areas on the map. A scale bar will appear on the maps which will also help you to work out distances and areas. If you need help, please discuss at the tutorials. A dot grid can also be used to calculate land areas (see Appendix II).

Table 1: Area statistics

Example – not scale of mapsScale - 1:20 000

1 cm : 200 m1 cm square: 200 m x 200 m

1 cm square: 40,000 square metres1 hectare = 10,000 square metres

So 1cm square (on the map) = 4 hectares (on the ground)

2. Contours and DrainageThe map shows contour lines, which represent areas of uniform elevation, with a constant interval in height between them. This means that where contours are spaced more closely together, the land surface is steeper, so may require conservative management to offset the potential erosion hazard. A key consideration should be:

Drainage lines, watercourses and riparian vegetation should be retained and carefully managed. They are at risk of erosion if cultivated or overgrazed.

Often these areas could benefit from revegetation and grazing management i.e. stock excluded and only crash grazed when appropriate. They may already contain native vegetation that is important for biodiversity on the property.

3. Current Infrastructure and Water ResourcesThe infrastructure map shows the location of existing fences, on ‘Waitara’. Considerations in fencing design should be taken in your plan. While it is preferable to keep current infrastructure where it is to reduce the costs associated with implementing the new plan, these resources can be flexible. If the benefits of their removal or relocation are exceeded by the costs involved then consider implementation.

The stock water supply on Waitara consists of dams across the property. While dams can be adequate, in dry times they can be unreliable and often stock tend to prefer to drink clean and fresh water from troughs. There is a 10,000 gallon tank on the hill above the homestead and also a bore and windmill in the middle of the property which could be utilised for water reticulation. If there is an addition of paddocks and increased stock numbers more watering points will be required.

7/27

Page 8: THE PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION · Web view2013 SCHOOLS PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION The Namoi Catchment Management Authority Schools Property Planning Competition is here again

4. Soil LandscapesSoil is the main resource upon which plant and animal production depends, so it is important to understand the features that determine the ability of a soil to support this production, and to be resilient towards degradation. The Soil Landscape map shows the extent of different soil landscapes on Waitara, and further detail is provided below.

The names given below are not the names of the individual soil types but the names of the soil landscape which can comprise of a number of soil types. The use of soil landscapes as a mapping unit allows the combining of soil and topographic (physical features) constraints into one unit so that the map can be viewed in terms of limitations for urban and rural development.

At the field day we will identify, test and describe the soil type within the landscape at a particular point on the farm using soil pits. In addition, we will describe how these soils where formed and what advantages and limitations they may have. “Waitara” is covered by 3 soil landscapes being Mount Milbulla, Tally Ho and Booloocooroo.

Mount MilbullaMount Milbulla is an erosional landscape situated on rolling and often steep hills. The hills are remnant basalt and dolerite plugs from the Garrawilla Volcanics (common around Mullaley) and the soils are shallow and highly erodible with occasional rocky outcrops. It is a known groundwater recharge area. The landuse has been predominately light grazing or unused due to steep slopes but extensive sheet erosion has occurred particularly on the more gentle slopes where vegetation has been cleared for grazing.

Tally HoThe Tally Ho soil landscape is characterised by undulating to rolling hills on slopes often below remnant volcanic plugs (i.e. Mount Milbulla Landscape). It is mainly derived from basalts and dolerites and has been mostly cleared for cultivation and grazing in the past which has led to areas of severe sheet, rill and gully erosion. The soils are predominately clays with moderate to very high fertility in the topsoil.

The limitations of this soil landscape include: Widespread sheet, rill and gully erosion hazard Stoniness and occasionally shallow soils Potential saline aquifer recharge zone Localised high water tables

BooloocoorooBooloocooroo is a transferral landscape derived from mixed sandstone/conglomerate and basaltic (volcanic) catchments found on broad drainage plains. Due to the mixed parent material of this landscape the soils can be a mix of Red-brown Earths to Brown Clays. Due to the high fertility of these soils, the lighter Red-brown Earths were cleared and cultivated from around the 1900’s and the heavier soils from about the 1950’s. However, major soil structural decline has occurred and gully erosion is often present.

8/27

Page 9: THE PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION · Web view2013 SCHOOLS PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION The Namoi Catchment Management Authority Schools Property Planning Competition is here again

The limitations of this soil landscape include: Seasonal waterlogging with some areas of high flood hazard Localised permanently high water tables Water erosion hazard High structural decline hazard Localised dryland salinity hazard Saline recharge area

When describing a soil so we can identify it and determine its strengths and weaknesses we need to look at a number of the soils features:

Soil Texture describes the relative proportions of sand (large particles), silt (small particles) and clay (tiny particles) in a soil. Texture indicates the ease with which a soil can be worked and its capacity to hold water and nutrients. Texture also affects the ability of a soil to handle machinery traffic, and its susceptibility to erosion.

Soil pH is a measure of the acidity and/or alkalinity of a soil. It is an important factor in determining the availability of nutrients and trace elements to plants. At low pH for example, nutrients such as phosphorus become deficient, while others such as aluminium become available in toxic amounts.

Soil colour gives a good guide to the level of organic matter, the amount and state of iron in the soil, the degree of leaching and level of drainage. A red coloured soil is due to highly oxidised iron (similar to rust) and indicate good drainage and are usually found higher on ridges and upper slopes. Yellow, grey and mottled soils are indicators of less well drained soils and are usually found in lower areas and on drainage lines.

Soil structure refers to the arrangement of soil particles, the strength of the bonding between them and the size and distribution of the pores throughout the soil. Structure plays an important role in determining the ability of a soil to absorb and to hold water and air. Also, the ease with which seedlings may emerge from and roots may penetrate the soil.

The rate of water infiltration of soil affects the productivity of a property. The more rainfall that soaks into the ground means more water available for plant production. The rate of water infiltration also affects the amount of run-off (which may increase soil erosion) and recharge to groundwater.

Soil salinity refers to the presence of salt in the soil. A high salt level is toxic to plants, and may cause poor pasture growth and reduced crop yield, and in extreme cases, bare patches of unproductive land.

Soil fertility refers to the chemical, physical and biological fertility of a soil. Chemical soil fertility refers to soil pH, soil salinity and the ability of the soil to store and supply plant nutrients. Physical soil fertility refers to soil texture and structure. Biological soil fertility refers to the amount of organic matter and the ability of the soil to support biological activity.

9/27

Page 10: THE PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION · Web view2013 SCHOOLS PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION The Namoi Catchment Management Authority Schools Property Planning Competition is here again

Soil health refers to the combination of the chemical, physical and biological fertility of a soil. A healthy soil can be defined as one that is productive and easy to manage under the intended land use. In addition, a healthy soil has biological, physical and chemical properties that promote the health of plants, animals and humans while also maintaining environmental quality.

5. Soil SalinitySoil salinity refers to the presence of salts in the soil. Salinity poses two potential problems to plant growth:

specific harmful effects of particular salts, and general effects of high osmotic pressure of the solution around the plant roots, which

effectively prevents the plant taking up water.

In severe cases, salt will kill plants and bare the ground surface, with white crystals visible. In less severe cases salt-tolerant indicator species may be present. Some soils have quite high salt loads at depth within the profile, so it is important to follow the management principles in order to reduce deep drainage and the occurrence of a rising water table and salinity.

Signs and symptoms of salinity trees dying in clusters for no apparent reason poor crop performance spread of bare patches of soil salt-tolerant species thriving salt crusts on the surface.

Salinity recharge and discharge areaThe recharge area is an area where water enters into the landscape – through the surface into the soil and rocks. Can be anywhere in the landscape – but is often in the upper parts, on the hills and slopes.

The discharge area is an area where water exits the landscape – can be at the break of slope, a change in soil type, a geological constriction, into a creek or drainage line, a dam or seep.

Management of SalinityManagement of salinity is about utilising water efficiently. Salt is mobilised through the landscape when it becomes dissolved in water. Salts are very soluble so are easily moved to areas where they can have a negative impact. Deep rooted perennial grass and trees are able to use water and access water deeper in the soil than shallow crops. Perennial grasses have the ability to grow all year round therefore have the capacity to use water when there is a rainfall event, rather than this water be lost to deep drainage in the soil and running off at the surface.

Efficient grazing management to encourage good growth of pastures is important as is limiting stock impact on fragile salt affected areas. Earthworks can be useful in areas to reduce erosion or wash off from salt affected areas.

10/27

Page 11: THE PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION · Web view2013 SCHOOLS PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION The Namoi Catchment Management Authority Schools Property Planning Competition is here again

Zero-till stubble retention systems and sound nutritional management can assist in reducing the effects of salinity on crop yields. This system reduces the accumulation of sodium and salts at the soil surface because it increases rainfall infiltration into the soil and reduces evaporation from the soil surface. Including deep-rooted crops in the rotation will also contribute to improved management of water and salt movement through the profile.

The adoption of water use efficiency in irrigation can assist in salinity management by reducing the potential for deep drainage and mobilisation of salts – particularly into groundwater or shallow aquifers.

6. Land Capability ClassesLand capability describes the ability of land to sustain a type of land use without causing permanent damage. If land is used beyond its capability, the resource becomes degraded and therefore has a reduced ability to support further productivity. In NSW an eight-class system is commonly used to assess land capability. Features such as slope, soil type, and erosion risk are considered, and the most limiting factor determines the overall capability class for any land portion. The diagram below indicates typical land capability boundaries in a landscape.

The following table describes the eight class system that was used to classify land on ‘Waitara’ (refer to land capability map), and indicates how each may be best managed to maintain its productivity and sustainability.

Table 3: Land Capability ClassesLand class Brief description

I Best cropping soils in NSW – flat. Usually flat land that is highly fertile and is often cropped continuously. Examples include market gardening area.

II Very good cropping land. Low slope with little erosion potential and good soil types. Techniques such as crop rotations and conservation farming will ensure long term sustainability of the farm environment.

III

Sloping cropping country that could wash and erode when ploughed. The land is also quite fertile cropping land but due to the length of slope, and perhaps the type of soil, erosion control earthworks such as contour banks should be used to control erosion. Conservation tillage techniques are recommended for Class III soils.

IV Best grazing country but too fragile for regular crops - up to 2 crops in 10 years with direct drilling or minimum tillage (tined implements recommended). Keep pastures taller than 5 cm. The land may be undulating

11/27

Page 12: THE PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION · Web view2013 SCHOOLS PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION The Namoi Catchment Management Authority Schools Property Planning Competition is here again

with main limitations being slope, rockiness, fertility of soil, and/or susceptibility to soil structure decline. Pasture improving, applying fertiliser and controlling grazing will maintain adequate groundcover.

V

As for class IV, but less capable because: some limitations are more significant, and/or because of existing or potential erosion, and the degree of slope, may

require erosion control earthworks (this is more so if the topsoil is to be exposed during cultivation).

Control of vermin, broadcasting of seed or aerial fertiliser application may also be necessary. There may be some waterlogging.

VI

Grazing land that must not be cultivated because of soils, slope, wind or water erosion hazard or rock. Requires good management such as controlled grazing or broadcast pasture improvement (often by air) for improved carrying capacity.

VIIToo fragile for grazing, keep trees for seed and honey. Land best left under green timber or undisturbed ground cover. The area could be a high recharge area.

VIII Non farming scenic woodland or wetland - not capable of sustaining agriculture production eg. cliffs, lakes, swamps and quarries.

Key Considerations

Using the above information on Land Capability, consider what land use enterprise options and management are best suited to the different areas of the property.

Current land use may exceed the land's capability. Are you going to maintain what is there or consider new enterprises or management strategies?

7. Vegetation and Habitat AreasDistribution of vegetation on the property can be observed on the maps provided. Native vegetation has been modified through clearing and a history of grazing and cultivation. Appendix III contains a species list of trees, shrubs and grasses expected to be found on ‘Waitara’, which may be relevant to your planning particularly if you propose to revegetate areas of the property.

Key Considerations:

Trees provide stock protection (shade and shelter), erosion control, timber supplies (firewood and fence posts), biodiversity and wildlife habitat, and farm beautification.

Trees are deep rooted and can often help to reduce the impact of salinity outbreak areas. They must, however, be placed in the correct position within the landscape to have this effect.

In less developed country, native vegetation regenerates easily when fenced from livestock. In more developed country (farmed for a longer period of time), vegetation would have to be planted.

8. Climate“Waitara” is situated on the North West Slopes of NSW. The property is situated in a summer rainfall zone but useful falls occur in winter and spring. The summers are hot

12/27

Page 13: THE PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION · Web view2013 SCHOOLS PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION The Namoi Catchment Management Authority Schools Property Planning Competition is here again

but not extreme, the winter days are mild and nights can be cool and occasionally frosty. The average rainfall is 634mm.

Figure 1 shows the average monthly rainfall over the year, and clearly demonstrates the pattern of summer dominance.

As well as rainfall, temperature is another important determinant of plant growth and influences infiltration and evaporation dynamics. Figure 2 shows the mean monthly minimum and maximum temperatures for ‘Waitara’.

More climatic information is available at: www.bom.gov.au/ c limate/averages/

Key Considerations

13/27

Mean Monthly Rainfall

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Month

Rai

nfal

l (m

m)

Mean Monthly Temperatures

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Month

Tem

pera

ture

(Deg

rees

C)

Mean maximumtemperatureMean minimumtemperature

Page 14: THE PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION · Web view2013 SCHOOLS PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION The Namoi Catchment Management Authority Schools Property Planning Competition is here again

Rainfall amount and seasonality determines the crop and pasture species that may be grown in an area and influences plant growth, erosion hazard, flooding hazard and groundwater levels.

The amount of rainfall influences stream-flow to lower areas and groundwater levels through deep drainage.

Temperature will affect plant growth and stock nutritional needs; management of the property needs to consider how the effect of temperature can be managed.

Wind speed and direction influences water use by crops and pastures, and is an important consideration when determining sites for wind breaks or stock shelter areas

9. Aboriginal Cultural HeritageThe Namoi Catchment is the traditional home of the Kamilaroi people. Archaeological evidence such as scar trees, rock art and tool sites provide a window into this heritage and historical land management. As this evidence even if it is found on privately owned land is protected, it is illegal to disturb, alter or destroy these sites. Whilst there are no known sites of significance to the local Kamilaroi people at ‘Waitara’, archaeological evidence and aboriginal access to farms is an exciting opportunity for land management and building social bridges between the aboriginal and non-aboriginal community. As such we have asked that you address a scenario of access by Kamilaroi people to ‘Waitara’ in your report.

Scenario

The local Kamilaroi people have asked the land manager if they may assist with conservation works such as tree planting and maintenance of a small site significant to them on ‘Waitara’. As the farm advisor, in your report briefly describe for the landholder a recommended common sense process as to how to manage this.

Aspects to consider include: Nature of conservation work Kamilaroi people are interested in Assessment of frequency, scale and impact of activity Benefits and risks to the landholder and to the Kamilaroi participants Potential impact on productivity and cost to landholder/Kamilaroi participants Potential security issues Ongoing maintenance expectations

There are a range of networks and organisations that could assist people in informal or formal ways to reach a situation where both parties benefit. Many grant schemes for example will prioritise applicants who are collaborating with aboriginal and non-aboriginal community organisations to achieve their outcomes. Examples of organisations that could assist you in developing a process include Namoi CMA, local Landcare Groups and Aboriginal Land Councils and Employment Agencies.

14/27

Page 15: THE PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION · Web view2013 SCHOOLS PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION The Namoi Catchment Management Authority Schools Property Planning Competition is here again

Photos from ‘Waitara’Photo A: Scalded and bare soil on the higher part of ‘Waitara’ facing east

Photo B: Salinity outbreak area with some saltbush plants

15/27

Page 16: THE PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION · Web view2013 SCHOOLS PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION The Namoi Catchment Management Authority Schools Property Planning Competition is here again

MANAGING THE RESOURCES1. Specific IssuesExisting problems on the property should be considered and will influence the final plan. If and what type of remedial action will be required? What enterprises and management strategies are most suited to these areas?

Table 4: Issues that exist at ‘Waitara’Issue Points to be aware of when developing management optionsSheet, rill and gully erosion

Areas of shallow soil, high slope, and erodible soils and those areas where groundcover is less than 70% are susceptible to sheet erosion. Natural drainage lines where water concentrates, or where water is directed off contour banks are susceptible to gully erosionSoil Erosion causes

Loss of top soil = loss of production potential downstream siltation water quality problems and degradation of the riparian zone

Constructed waterways also require special attention and management as these areas often have significant amounts of water flowing through them during a rain period and can erode if groundcover is not kept at a high level.

Shallow soils

There are some areas of the property which have shallow soils and high rock content. Shallow soils have: Low water holding capacity, which results in lower production potential. Poor infiltration, so increased run-off leads to poor plant establishment and susceptibility

to erosion. Low fertility that results in reduced plant vigour therefore reducing plant production.

Salinity There is a salt discharge site on ‘Waitara’. Areas of bare ground are present and salt tolerant plants such as saltbush have been planted in the past. Vegetation must be carefully managed in these areas to prevent more scalding and loss of groundcover leading to loss of agricultural production and increased erosion risks. Other risk areas are on the break of slope.

Tree decline

Waitara has very low tree cover because of past clearing, cropping, grazing and competition from pastures. Tree decline can reduce agricultural production through loss of shade and shelter, as well contributing to other forms of land degradation such as erosion, salinity and water logging. Carefully think about where would be best appropriate to plant trees.

Poor groundcover

Reduced groundcover from over grazing and long term conventional farming leading to bare scalded areas and erosion. This can lead to more annual grasses and more annual and perennial species with poor nutritional value for stock.

Water quality

Erosion particularly on the scalded areas will contribute to waterways in the catchment to experience higher levels of turbidity (muddy water) causing a decline in water quality.

Weeds Environmental weeds are those which are not listed as noxious but do pose serious environmental threats to biodiversity of the catchment.

16/27

Page 17: THE PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION · Web view2013 SCHOOLS PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION The Namoi Catchment Management Authority Schools Property Planning Competition is here again

2. Legal Obligations Many legal constraints affect the final property plan. Table 5 briefly outlines some legal constraints and their implications for the property. In addition to those listed below it may be necessary to address other Acts depending on your final plan, including the Pesticides Act 1990, the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and the Work Health and Safety Act 2011, all of which can found at www.legislation.nsw.gov.au.

Table 5: Possible legal constraintsIssue Legal constraintsNative Vegetation Clearing

Native Vegetation Act 2003 (NSW) Clearing of native vegetation (except under Routine Agricultural Management Activities [RAMA’s]) must be approved through the Native Vegetation Act 2003. An application to clear must be approved by Namoi CMA. For more information go to www.environment.nsw.gov.au/vegetation/nvmanagement

Threatened species Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 (NSW) Endangered ecological communities such as Grassy White Box Woodlands are protected by this Act.

Threatened ecological communities

Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Commonwealth) (EPBC Act). This act provides national and protection and management of important flora, fauna, ecological communities and heritage places with national environmental significance.

Protected land Soil Conservation Act 1938This applies to stream banks (no native vegetation removal within 20 metres of stream bank). Also applies to lands that are steep, greater than 33 %, 18 degrees. Existing native vegetation must be retained and allowed to regenerate. This includes grasses as well as shrubs and trees.

Noxious weeds Noxious Weeds Act 1993Bushfire Management

Rural Fires Act 1997, all burning and fires are to be carried out in accordance with this Act.

Local Government Planning Zones

Rural Zone - Generally encourages rural pursuits within this zone, and incompatible development should be controlled

Water – farm dams Water Management Act 2000Under the Water Reform legislation up to 10% of the water that falls on the property may be harvested (stored in a dam) and used for any purpose before a licence must be obtained. This is called the harvestable right. This guarantees a basic level of access to a water supply for the rural community.For more information go to www.water.nsw.gov.au/Water-Licensing/Basic-water-rights/default.aspx

Water Water Management Act 2000Groundwater licences, floodplain management, environmental flows are all included under this Act. Check for more information as approvals are required for some activities relating to water management in NSW.

17/27

Page 18: THE PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION · Web view2013 SCHOOLS PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION The Namoi Catchment Management Authority Schools Property Planning Competition is here again

PUTTING THE PLAN TOGETHER The section may help you decide what to put in your physical plan and what recommendations to give in your report.

1. Specific WorksThis section outlines specific works you may want to include in your property plan. These works are to be marked on your map, and then referred to in your report.

Conservation Earthworks Where broad area management practices alone are not capable of controlling a soil erosion problem, conservation earthworks may be required to remediate the problem.

In areas subject to erosion, suitable control structures may include contour banks, levees, pasture belts, and waterways, gully filling and gully control dams.

Structures that control water erosion are designed to remove excess water from the land before it can cause erosion. Excess water removed in this way can be directed into dams, adding to the farm water supply, or disposed of into the creek and flow lines (water disposal areas).

Any erosion control program that involves diversion of run-off must provide for safe disposal of that water.

When considering the disposal of run-off water, it is important to identify the flow-lines and points at which water naturally leaves the property.

There is a legal obligation to ensure that there is no diversion of run-off from one exit point to another. Once these exit points are known it is then possible to design and locate a system of erosion earthworks.

The modification of catchments through soil erosion control works that alters the way water is delivered to watercourses may affect stream behaviour and stability. When undertaking conservation earthworks the impact on downstream areas should be considered.

For your map, it is only necessary to shade the areas that you believe require earthworks. Potential earthworks should be planned and discussed with relevant experts where necessary and neighbours due to legal obligations and the often complex nature of designing and implementing structures.

Water SupplyWater supplies have a significant effect on property management. Your task is to advise the landholders of the options open to them and give them reasons for the option/s you recommend. Make sure you consider the current enterprises on the property and match these to the water supply option you recommend.

Native Vegetation Native tree decline has occurred throughout the property over the years. It may be important to think about planting and establishing more trees throughout the property especially shelter belts, windbreaks, wildlife corridors and salt interception plantings.

18/27

Page 19: THE PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION · Web view2013 SCHOOLS PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION The Namoi Catchment Management Authority Schools Property Planning Competition is here again

Native vegetation is an integral part of the landscape and has a major role in catchment management. If you intend to include revegetation activities in your plan, you need to consider the following information.

Method of vegetation establishment i.e. tubestock planting versus natural revegetation.

Protecting remnant vegetation and regeneration areas from grazing where good seed banks or seedlings occur. This is cheaper than planting other areas.

The location of native vegetation establishment must be determined in conjunction with other considerations such as climate, boundaries, roads, powerlines, and connections with existing trees for habitat expansion and biodiversity.

If you are recommending establishment of native vegetation there are a number of issues you should include in your report. They could include but are not limited to; the selection and source of suitable tree species, design, tree planting techniques, methods of excluding stock and weed control.

2. Management RecommendationsThe next step in your plan is to determine the broad area land management practices for land within the property. The management recommendations should take into account the information provided, address the hazards outlined in Table 4, and consider the legal constraints given in Table 5.

Land Management PracticesLand management practices are best shown as shaded areas, or using a numbered system on the final plan with a summarised legend. Land management considerations that should be considered over the whole or parts of the property may include:

Enterprise selection e.g. dryland cropping, irrigated cropping or grazing etc

Pasture selection and management

Soil management

Weed and vermin control

Fire prevention and control

Drought management

Management of riparian areas

Protection of environmentally sensitive lands

Use of land within its capability

Tree and native vegetation management

Planning for seasonal feed value and availabilityThe current pastures on ‘Waitara’ have some limitations, which could be improved using grazing management and infrastructure. Native perennial pastures provide the bulk of feed in summer. How best to cope with this? Options include:

19/27

Page 20: THE PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION · Web view2013 SCHOOLS PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION The Namoi Catchment Management Authority Schools Property Planning Competition is here again

growing fodder crops, particularly oats reducing stock numbers during autumn/winter changing some of the pastures to reduce the severity of summer dominance changing the pasture species to increase groundcover and reduce erosion

Marketing DecisionsThink about different markets that could be accessed by the landholders and identify if these would be suitable for the property in regards to land capability, location of property (close to selling points such as sale yards) and meeting landholder goals.

3. MonitoringWhen you have decided on what management options you wish to implement you may want to include some ways in which to monitor the changes. You can select a number of sites in which the landholder can do regular monitoring. The sites should either be representative of a large proportion of the property or have an obvious or suspected land degradation problem. Consider carefully as you do not want to choose too many as this will be time consuming for the landholder.

Decide on some indicators of change that you can use to monitor physical changes on the property. Think about some of the tests and assessments you participated in at the field day. Some examples could include:

Pasture and/or groundcover percentage

Pasture and/or crop yields

Soil carbon or structural changes and soil pH

Groundwater levels

Records of bird sightings as an increase in the number and diversity of species signals better environmental conditions

Water quality

Mark the sites on your map and refer to them in your report.

20/27

Page 21: THE PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION · Web view2013 SCHOOLS PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION The Namoi Catchment Management Authority Schools Property Planning Competition is here again

THE PLAN AND REPORT 1. The Physical Plan

Once you have considered the information and issues, the next step is to draw up your property plan. Download and print the boundary map then draw directly onto the page. The north arrow, scale and boundary are already marked so all you need to do is draw on your plan. Standard mapping symbols used in property planning are given below but you are not limited to using these symbols as long as you label and include a legend.

A good tip when drawing your plan is to use standard mapping colours i.e. blue for water, brown for earthworks, green for vegetation. Using shading or hatching over an area can show what the plan is for that area i.e. changing the land use for that paddock.

Dam Contour

Yards Waterway

Windmill Tree regeneration area

Tank Windbreak

Watering point Tree lot

2. The ReportYou are allowed a maximum of five A4 pages for the report.

Remember that land use and management proposals should be outlined in your report along with reasons for your decisions. List options then justify the recommended action.

DO NOT use Appendices to explain your report findings as they WILL NOT be read or marked. Appendices are only to be used for information that supports your findings and should be directly relevant to the report.

A major part of property planning is evaluation of alternative enterprises for each particular management unit. This usually includes a comparison and assessment of the economic viability of the alternative enterprise as well as addressing physical requirements. However, for the purposes of this exercise it is not necessary to produce a detailed report on economic aspects. A simple summary is sufficient along with a short explanation of why a particular enterprise was chosen. Nevertheless, it is still important to consider how you would fund any specific works suggested.

21/27

TRA

WB

TL

Page 22: THE PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION · Web view2013 SCHOOLS PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION The Namoi Catchment Management Authority Schools Property Planning Competition is here again

EXTRA RESOURCES 1. ExpertiseThere are many sources of information you can access for technical information. Below is a preliminary list to get you started.

NSW Catchment Management Authorities

NSW Department of Environment and Heritage

NSW Department of Primary Industries

Commercial agronomists

Your local library and school resources

2. Funding OpportunitiesThink about if works and management changes you are considering are able to be funded through external means. Environmental works that have public benefit (in addition to benefits to the landholder) may be able to be supported financially through different organisations. The following sources of information may be useful:

Grants Information: www.grantslink.gov.au

Caring for our Country: www.nrm.gov.au

Namoi Catchment Management Authority: www.namoi.cma.nsw.gov.au

3. Other relevant organisations and websitesRead through these and other web pages for more detail on various subjects.

NSW Departments and Organisations:NSW Department of Primary IndustriesNSW Department of Environment and HeritageNSW Office of Water NSW Soil Conservation ServiceLandcare NSW

www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/agriculturewww.environment.nsw.gov.au

www.water.nsw.gov.auwww.lands.nsw.gov.au/soil_conservation www.landcarensw.org.au

National Departments and Organisations:Australian Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and CommunitiesAustralian Department of Agriculture Fisheries and ForestryGreening AustraliaNational Dryland Salinity ProgramMurray Darling Basin AuthorityCSIRO

www.environment.gov.au

www.daff.gov.au

w ww.g r eeningaustralia.org.au www.ndsp.gov.auwww.mdba.gov.auwww.csiro.au

Others:Landline ABCMeat and Livestock Australia

www.a bc. n et.au/landline www.mla.com.au

22/27

Page 23: THE PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION · Web view2013 SCHOOLS PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION The Namoi Catchment Management Authority Schools Property Planning Competition is here again

APPENDIX I: MARKING SCHEDULESchool: Student names: MARKER ID:

Criterion Not done0

Consideration givenMarks: 1 - 2

Adequate standard Marks: 3 - 5

High standard Marks: 6 - 8

Score

1) Consideration of Land Use issues and hazards

No discussion of strategies to manage property considering land use constraints.

Inappropriate suggestions to manage property considering land use constraints.

Good discussion of strategies to manage property considering land use issues. Appropriate management decisions.

Thorough discussion of strategies to manage property considering land use issues and hazards. Appropriate management decisions made. Innovative strategies explored.

2) Enterprise selection, range, justification and suitability

No information presented to show enterprise selection.

Irrelevant or inappropriate enterprise selection. No reasons given.

Appropriate enterprise selection. Relevant and adequate explanation of enterprise selection.

Appropriate enterprise selection. Relevant and adequate explanation of enterprise selection. Innovative ideas demonstrated that meet the requirements of landholder and land resource.

3) Consideration of Landholders aims

No consideration given. Some consideration given to some aims.

Some consideration given to all aims. High level of consideration shown for all aims.

4) Map Presentation Not included, poor presentation. Some effort shown to present map Map presented clearly with some effort made with presentation.

Map presented very clearly and to a high standard with effort made with presentation.

5) Report Presentation Not included, poor presentation. Some effort shown to present report report presented clearly with some effort made with presentation

Report presented very clearly and to a high standard with effort made with presentation.

Criterion Not done0

Consideration givenMarks: 1

Adequate standard Marks: 2

High standard Marks: 4

Score

6) Use of Resource Information provided

No use of information provided. Some resource information used to develop management recommendations or map.

Most resource information used to develop management recommendations and map.

All resource information used to develop both management recommendations and map.

7) Legal considerations accounted for

No accounting for legal considerations.

Legal constraints considered, but unclear how they affected decisions.

Legal constraints considered. Clearly affected management decisions.

Legal issues clearly considered and applied to management, Consideration given to overcoming legal constraints.

8) Funding considered No consideration of funding works.

Mention of need to source funding. Funding sources suggested for works proposed.

Range of funding options explored and linked to proposed works.

9) Use of other resources No reference to other resources used.

References given to use of resources, but irrelevant resources used.

References given to use of resources. Relevant resources used but not referenced.

List of relevant resources mentioned in text and references given.

10) Monitoring No consideration to monitoring of recommended and works

Need to monitor mentioned Map shows monitoring points and strategy described

Range of monitoring options given with preferred strategies recommended and mapped.

11) Aboriginal Cultural Heritage

No consideration given/no response to criteria

1-2 responses given or poor understanding of issue

3-5 responses given with some understanding of issue

>5 responses given. Good understanding of issue. Mention of specific points. Evidence of ideas being used in plan.

23

Page 24: THE PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION · Web view2013 SCHOOLS PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION The Namoi Catchment Management Authority Schools Property Planning Competition is here again

APPENDIX II: THE DOT GRIDYou can easily calculate areas on an air photo (or any other map) using a dot grid as long as you know the scale of the photo. You can use it for calculating areas of the farm such as paddocks, tree planting areas and erosion areas. A dot grid consists of a series of squares, 1 centimetre x 1 centimetre in size. Within each square there are 25 dots. The dot grid is made of clear plastic, so it can be placed over the aerial photograph.From the aerial photograph you wish to know the area of the paddock that has the shape below.

1. Place the dot grid over the area to be measured2. Trace the outline of the area3. There are 13 complete squares (1-13), which is equal to 13 sq cm4. There are a total of 45 dots remaining in incomplete squares5. To convert dots to sq cm, divide by 25 (because there are 25 dots in each square)6. Add the answers from Steps 3 and 5, ie. 13 + 1.8 = 14.8 sq cm7. The scale of the aerial photograph in this example will be 1:7,500. (Check the scale on your own map.)

Therefore;

7,500 X 7,50010,000 10,000= 0.56 ha/sq cm

8. Final calculationStep 7 x Step 6= 0.56 x 14.8= 8.3 haTo convert to acres multiply by 2.471= 20.5 acres

This method can be used to calculate small or large areas on your aerial photograph.

THIS EXAMPLE IS NOT THE SCALE OF YOUR MAP.

USE THE SAME PROCESS TO CALCULATE YOUR OWN AREAS.

24

Page 25: THE PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION · Web view2013 SCHOOLS PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION The Namoi Catchment Management Authority Schools Property Planning Competition is here again

25

Page 26: THE PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION · Web view2013 SCHOOLS PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION The Namoi Catchment Management Authority Schools Property Planning Competition is here again

APPENDIX III: VEGETATION SPECIES EXPECTED AT ‘Waitara’

Canopy Species:Botanical Name Common NameAngophora floribundaCallistris endlicheriCallitris glaucophyllaCasurina cristataEucalyptus albensEucalyptus blakelyiEucalyptus camaldulensisEucalyptus dealbataEucalyptus melliodoraEucalyptus microcarpaEucalyptus populneaEucalyptus pilliganesis

Rough-Barked AppleBlack Cypress PineWhite Cypress PineBelahWhite BoxBlakely’s Red GumRiver Red GumTumbledown Red GumYellow BoxWestern Grey BoxBimble BoxPilliga Box

Midstorey Species:Botanical Name Common NameAcacia pendulaAlectryon oleifoliusAlphitonia excelsaAtriplex sp.Brachychiton populneusCapparis mitchelliiDodonaea viscosaEremophylla mitchelliiGeijera parvifloraNotelaea macrocarpaRhagodia sp.

Weeping MyallWestern RosewoodRed AshSaltbushesKurrajongNative OrangeSticky Hop BushBuddaWilgaNative OliveSaltbushes

Groundcover Species:

26

Botanical Name Common NameAristida spp.Austrostipa spp.Austrostipa aristiglumisAustrostipa verticillataAustrodanthonia spBothriochloa spp.Chloris spp.Cymbopogon refractusCyperus spp.Dicanthium sericeumEragrostis spp.Juncus spp.Marsilea drummondiiPanicum spp.Themeda australisWahlenbergia gracilis

Wire GrassesSpear GrassesPlains GrassSlender Bamboo GrassWallaby GrassRed GrassesWindmill GrassesBarbed-wire GrassSedgesQueensland BluegrassLove GrassesRushesCommon NardooPanicsKangaroo GrassAustralian Bluebell

Source: Banks R.G. (1995). Soil Landscapes of the Curlewis 1:100 000 Sheet Map, Department of Conservation and Land Management, Sydney

Page 27: THE PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION · Web view2013 SCHOOLS PROPERTY PLANNING COMPETITION The Namoi Catchment Management Authority Schools Property Planning Competition is here again

APPENDIX IV: Cover page template

Cover page

2013 Property Planning Competition Entry

‘Waitara’

Category entering: Junior/Senior

Name of school:

Name of contributing students:

Date submitted:

27