the production of open courses as a transformative practice: a case study of the chinese top level...
DESCRIPTION
Stian Haklev of University of Toronto presents on the Chinese Top Level Courses Project.TRANSCRIPT
The Production of Open Courses as a Transformative Practice:
A Case Study of the Chinese Top Level Courses Project
Stian Håklev, PhD Student, OISE/University of TorontoPresentation to OpenCoursewareConsortium Global 2011
April 7, 2011 - Creative Commons BY
What kind of a “thing” is OCW?
CC BY allygirl520 @ flickr
OCW as a norm
6
free software
6
http://fusionanomaly.net/informationwantstobefree.html
PD English Wikipedia
How can we analyze the spread of a norm?
Finnemore & Sikkink: the life-‐cycle of norms
Women’s suffrage, land-‐mine ban
Realist vs. constructivist view of international system
Norm entrepreneurs
Organizational platform
Forming vocabulary, change in identity and motivation
Tipping point: 1/3 of all participants (states)?
Institutionalization
OCW as an policy innovation
CC BY txd @ flickr
March 15, 2010 Open Sharing, Global Benefits
Universities working together to advance education andempower people worldwide through opencourseware.
9
Connecting with Your University’s Goals—Recruitment
• A 2005 Poll showed that 50% of incoming MIT students were aware of MIT OCW.• 35% of those students based their choice of MIT at least in part on their experience of MIT OCW• By mid-October of their first year, 95% of those students had visited the OCW site.
OCW Consortium Toolkit http://www.ocwconsortium.org/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=33&Itemid=
March 15, 2010 Open Sharing, Global Benefits
Universities working together to advance education andempower people worldwide through opencourseware.
10
Connecting with Your University’s Goals—Recruitment
• Builds a prior academic relationship with bright, motivated students, their families, their teachers and their advisors
• Showcases key departments, faculty and courses
March 15, 2010 Open Sharing, Global Benefits
Universities working together to advance education andempower people worldwide through opencourseware.
11
Connecting with Your University’s Goals—Reputation
An OCW site can showcase areas of excellence in our university, such as name specific programs. Heightened awareness of these programs not only will attract talented students and faculty to our school but also will increase the visibility of our faculty within their disciplines.
March 15, 2010 Open Sharing, Global Benefits
Universities working together to advance education andempower people worldwide through opencourseware.
12
Connecting with Your University’s Goals—Retention
An OCW site provides students with the potential for self-paced review of study materials before, during and after taking a course. Such review greatly increases a student’s chances of success in both that course and subsequent courses which build upon its teachings.
March 15, 2010 Open Sharing, Global Benefits
Universities working together to advance education andempower people worldwide through opencourseware.
13
Connecting with Your University’s Goals—Advising
The ability to view OCW materials prior to enrollment allows students to make more informed choices about which courses and majors are right for them.
Likewise, advisors will be able to base their recommendations on concrete information about courses, their requirements and their benefits.
How can we analyze the spread of a policy innovation?
David Phillips: policy attraction
more likely to borrow in time of upheaval, change or great crisis
Mintrom & Vergari: policy networks
investigating policy on school choice in US states -‐ what causes similarity? closeness of states, or similar attributes? no, attending the same conferences!
The role of MIT, and MIT’s faculty, international conferences,organizations (OCW Consortium, CCLearn/CC, UNESCO IIEP)
OCW in East Asia
16
17
18
19
Institutionalism
Meyer & Ramirez: convergence
Large quantitative analyses of educational systems
Every aspect of education is becoming more similar,one model is becoming institutionalized.
Mainland China
Outline
what is the Chinese Top Level Courses Project, how does it work?
how did it come to be, Chinese historical and higher-‐ed context
some thoughts on the future of this project, and distance ed in China
My research approach
participating in an international conference in Dalian in 2008
participation in many international conferences, and communication with people in MIT OCW, Hewlett etc
analysis of Chinese academic papers, and government policies
two visits -‐ summer 2009 and winter 2009-‐10
formal interviews with professors and academic staff at two universities
visits to a number of Chinese departments of education, interaction with graduate students and professors researching relevant topics
a number of presentations in China, including one for the Top Level National Courses resource center, testing my tentative findings
24
Features of the Chinese OER project
selective and competitive
three levels (campus, province, national)
teaching teams
both content and method
financial support, requirement to make course available online for five years
three kinds: undergraduate, vocational, and online courses
Purposes
induce full professors to teach undergraduate courses
encourage professors to use more technology in their teaching
encourage formation of teaching teams, rethinking of course material and teaching methods
courses function as “models” for other professors
(course material used directly by students?)
Evaluation criteria
• teaching team, including responsible person and main lecturer• the composition and quality of teaching team• educational reform and educational research• the course content• the organization and planning of the course content• the practical components (removed in 2008)• teaching materials and other resources• conditions for practical components• online teaching environment• instructional design• instructional approach• instructional practice• instructional outcomes – evaluation by peers, by university supervisor• student evaluations• evaluation of recorded materials
Lanzhou City Universitycase study
Have already been evaluating best coursesinternally since 2003. Developed system of indicators of course quality
Issue announcement, meeting of heads ofdepartments
Teaching committee to identify basic andadvanced courses they could apply for
Brought teachers together with computerdepartment
School gave certain amount of funding
Clear philosophy: Construction of CQOCW will improve quality of all coursesNot just about putting old courses online, but rethink content, teaching methodology, etc.
Internal committee to evaluate courses, then invited 20 external experts - used online material, also sat in on classes
In the end, 11 courses were selected for provincial CQOCW
(浅议精品课程在教学工作中的作用, 王雪引)
JPKC diplomaHonor
Quality Project(质量工程)
The OER project is a key part of the Quality Project, but it’s not the only part:
The program targets 1000 universities with 10 million FT students, and will cost approximately USD $365 million.
Targets:Help 3000 professors and administrators to develop peer training exchangesSelect 1000 national-level teaching teamsGive awards to 500 top national teachersDevelop 500 experimental teaching centers500 individual talent development and creativity areas500 high quality bilingual classes
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
historical background
Not quite like lightning from a blue sky
French and German model of the medieval university
course teams, course evaluations go way back, from the Soviet Union?
massification
985 -‐ evaluate the best universities (peer-‐review)
and the key disciplines
evaluating best courses: natural next step
push for increase in use of computers in higher ed already from early 1990’s
(evidence from interviews)
future trends
What does the future hold?
New cycle in 2011?
Education Plan 2010-‐2020: less focus on distance ed for degrees, more focus on life-‐long learning and continuing ed.
Encouraging reuse of the resources
Key numbers from China’s 2010-‐2020 education plan
53
Establishing Beijing and Shanghai Open Universities
course teams, course evaluations go way back, from the Soviet Union?
985 -‐ evaluate the best universities (peer-‐review)
and the key disciplines
evaluating best courses: natural next step
push for increase in use of computers in higher ed already from early 1990’s
(evidence from interviews)
Foreign open course craze
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
Thank you!
[email protected]://reganmian.net/blogCC BY
Thesis can be downloaded in a variety of formats from http://reganmian.net/top-level-courses