the principles of the lean business system: #6 partnering · the principles of the lean business...
TRANSCRIPT
25 October, 2013© S A Partners
The Principles of the Lean
Business System:
#6 Partnering
Lean in the 21st Century ™ Series
Professor Peter Hines
25 October, 2013© S A Partners
• Welcome
• Webinar will last about 1 hour
• We will invite you to complete
a few Polls
• Q&A session
Our Webinar
Lean in the 21st Century™
25 October, 2013© S A Partners
• Frederick Taylor invented the business system used by
organizations throughout the 20th Century
– Cost is the focus
– Scientific Management System
– Functionally organized by expertise
– Built for internal efficiency
– Not fit for the global , competitive environment of the 21st century
– Relies on traditional management to be effective
– Objective is to minimize the time it takes to do value added
processes
• Peter Hines has invented a business system of the 21st
Century
– People are the focus
– Value Management System
– Organized by value delivered
– Built for productivity in an extended enterprise
– Fit for the global, competitive environment of the 21st century
– Relies on leadership disposition and language to be effective
– Objective is to reduce or eliminate non-value added activities
Welcome!
• Co-founder Lean Enterprise Research Centre, Cardiff University
• Chairman, S A Partners• Adjunct Professor, University of
South Australia
Professor Peter Hines
90% of problems in business are caused by management, 10% by the workman. F. W. Taylor, 1912
25 October, 2013© S A Partners
• Research conducted by Professor Peter Hines identified 5 key elements of success:-
• Link business system to a one to two year strategy through Policy Deployment
• Dismantle traditional, siloed, functionally-focused business processes
• Deploy human resources aligned to value to be delivered
• Develop leadership to be effective in a 21st century business system space
• Synchronize business systems with suppliers and customers
We encapsulate this in an evolutionary business model rooted in time tested customer, quality and lean thinking
The Lean Business Model
How we see creating a 21st
century business system…
25 October, 2013© S A Partners
The Lean Business Model ®
Original source: Professor Peter Hines
Benchmarking Toyota’s Supply Chain: Japan vs U.K.
Long Range Planning, February, Volume 31, Number 6, pp. 911-918, 1998, ISSN 0024-6301
25 October, 2013© S A Partners
The Principles
25 October, 2013© S A Partners
Admin
Qualityproblems
Market testingvia competitivequotes
Pricenegotiation
Traditional Role
Admin
SupplierMeasurement& ImprovementActivity
Supplier Strategy
ComponentDevelopmentStrategy
Negotiation
New Role
Cost Reduction& Cost Planning
AdditionalNewActivities
% ofBuyer’sTime
….this requires a different mentality
towards supply chain integration
Quality Problems
Expeditinginformation& parts
25 October, 2013© S A Partners
• How much of your purchasing time is value added?
• 0-10%
• 11-20%
• 21-40%
• 41-60%
• 60%+
• Please select one answer
Poll #1
25 October, 2013© S A Partners
Japan Value
Added
Competitive
Gap
UK Value
Added
Indexed
Competitive
Gap
Apportionment
Assemble 22.2 1.82 40.4 18.0%
1st Tier 22.1 2.84 62.8 40.2%
2nd Tier 9.6 4.35 41.8 31.8%
3rd Tier 2.8 4.35 12.2 9.3%
4th Tier 0.2 4.35 0.9 0.7%
Raw Materials 43.1 1.00 43.1 0.0%
Total 100% 2.01 201.2% 100%
Competitive Advantage in Toyota
Toyota’s Primary Source of Competitive Advantage is in its ability to manage & develop its Supply Chain
25 October, 2013© S A Partners
A World Class Supplier Base:
Toyota Japan (mid 90s)
Measure Toyota
Supplier
UK
Supplier
Gap
Delivered
Quality
5.1 ppm 1250 ppm 244x
Value Added
per employee
£76.9K £29.6K 2.6x
On Time
Delivery
99.96% 89.28% 268x
25 October, 2013© S A Partners
• How much of your total sales are bought in content?
• 0-20%
• 21-40%
• 41-60%
• 61-80%
• 81-100%
• Please select one answer
Poll #2
25 October, 2013© S A Partners
Network Sourcing Model Overview
1. A tiered supply structure with a heavy reliance on small firms
2. A small number of direct suppliers with individual part numbers sourced from one supplier but within a competitive dual sourcing environment
3. High degrees of asset specificity among suppliers and risk sharing between customer and supplier alike
4. A maximum buy strategy by each company within the semi-permanent supplier network, but a maximum make strategy within these trusted networks
5. A high degree of bilateral design employing the skills and knowledge of both customers and suppliers alike
6. A high degree of supplier innovation in both new products and processes
7. Close, long-term relations between network members involving a high level of trust, openness and profit sharing
8. The use of rigorous supplier mapping and measurement increasingly giving way to supplier self-certification
9. A high level of supplier coordination by the customer company at each level of the tiered supply structure
10. A significant effort made by customers at each level individually to develop their suppliers
25 October, 2013© S A Partners
Network Sourcing Model Overview
1. A tiered supply structure with a heavy reliance on small firms
2. A small number of direct suppliers with individual part numbers sourced from one supplier but within a competitive dual sourcing environment
3. High degrees of asset specificity among suppliers and risk sharing between customer and supplier alike
4. A maximum buy strategy by each company within the semi-permanent supplier network, but a maximum make strategy within these trusted networks
5. A high degree of bilateral design employing the skills and knowledge of both customers and suppliers alike
6. A high degree of supplier innovation in both new products and processes
7. Close, long-term relations between network members involving a high level of trust, openness and profit sharing
8. The use of rigorous supplier mapping and measurement increasingly giving way to supplier self-certification
9. A high level of supplier coordination by the customer company at each level of the tiered supply structure
10. A significant effort made by customers at each level individually to develop their suppliers
Organisation & Structure
Common Destiny & Relationship
Measurement & Improvement
25 October, 2013© S A Partners
Network Sourcing Model Overview
1. A tiered supply structure with a heavy reliance on small firms
2. A small number of direct suppliers with individual part numbers sourced from one supplier but within a competitive dual sourcing environment
3. High degrees of asset specificity among suppliers and risk sharing between customer and supplier alike
4. A maximum buy strategy by each company within the semi-permanent supplier network, but a maximum make strategy within these trusted networks
5. A high degree of bilateral design employing the skills and knowledge of both customers and suppliers alike
6. A high degree of supplier innovation in both new products and processes
7. Close, long-term relations between network members involving a high level of trust, openness and profit sharing
8. The use of rigorous supplier mapping and measurement increasingly giving way to supplier self-certification
9. A high level of supplier coordination by the customer company at each level of the tiered supply structure
10. A significant effort made by customers at each level individually to develop their suppliers
Organisation & Structure
25 October, 2013© S A Partners
1. Tiered Supply Structure
Deep Pan: Many LayersThin and Crispy: Few Layers
SmallFirms
Key Characteristics & Activities:
• Module rather than component purchasing• Consolidation of ‘catalogue’ parts e.g. fixings• Re-tiering of less important suppliers• Closer relationships with the vital few• Closer design linkages• Higher percentage of costs from smaller (cheaper) suppliers
25 October, 2013© S A Partners
2. Small Number of Direct Suppliers
with ‘Multiple’ Sourcing
Few DirectSuppliers
Mazda
ToyoKogyo
DeltaKogyo
Mazda 3 Seats Mazda 6 Seats
1/3rd 1/3rd 1/3rd
Zone ofIntenseCompetition
25 October, 2013© S A Partners
3. High Degree of Asset
Specificity
• The degree to which suppliers make specific investments concerned
with their ability to supply any one particular company
• The greater the degree of asset specificity, the greater the degree of risk
sharing in new projects & short term opportunism by ether trading
partner
• Trust is fundamental - Asset specificity is not the cause but a
consequence of the strategies
• 4 types of asset specificity
– Physical asset specificity - e.g. dies, moulds & tooling
– Dedicated asset specificity - e.g. investment in production capacity
– Human asset specificity - e.g. education for one customer
– Site asset specificity - e.g. location close to customer firm
25 October, 2013© S A Partners
4. Maximum Buy Strategy
• The individual participant in an excellent network
enacts a maximum buy strategy while the whole
network enacts a maximum make strategy
• Keep as much as possible in your semi-permanent
supplier network
• Degree of value adding is low
– Toyota - accounts for 22% of total costs (materials, tools
& finished parts
– GM - traditionally accounts for 50%
25 October, 2013© S A Partners
Network Sourcing Model Overview
1. A tiered supply structure with a heavy reliance on small firms
2. A small number of direct suppliers with individual part numbers sourced from one supplier but within a competitive dual sourcing environment
3. High degrees of asset specificity among suppliers and risk sharing between customer and supplier alike
4. A maximum buy strategy by each company within the semi-permanent supplier network, but a maximum make strategy within these trusted networks
5. A high degree of bilateral design employing the skills and knowledge of both customers and suppliers alike
6. A high degree of supplier innovation in both new products and processes
7. Close, long-term relations between network members involving a high level of trust, openness and profit sharing
8. The use of rigorous supplier mapping and measurement increasingly giving way to supplier self-certification
9. A high level of supplier coordination by the customer company at each level of the tiered supply structure
10. A significant effort made by customers at each level individually to develop their suppliers
Common Destiny & Relationship
25 October, 2013© S A Partners
5. Bilateral Design
• The role of subcontractors in new product
development
• Subcontractors supply 70% of the value of end
products. Therefore they should play a major role in
the introduction of new products
Make toCustomer Drawings
SupplierBlack Boxor Catalogue Parts
Networking SourcingBilateral Design
25 October, 2013© S A Partners
Lean Sourcing Target
Target cost
Time
15%
3-5%
3-5%
3-5%
3-5%
Innovation
Target cost
Stepwise savings with IPD
Continuous improvements
Continuous improvements with Category Management
Kaizen cost
25 October, 2013© S A Partners
6. High Degree of Supplier
Innovation
• Supplier do not wait to be asked for ideas
• Suppliers always seeking ways to help you in terms
of product, process or people
• Preferred Customer syndrome
25 October, 2013© S A Partners
7. Close Long Term Trusting
Relationships
• Goodwill Trust
• Tough but fair
• High pressure but shared rewards
25 October, 2013© S A Partners
Network Sourcing Model Overview
1. A tiered supply structure with a heavy reliance on small firms
2. A small number of direct suppliers with individual part numbers sourced from one supplier but within a competitive dual sourcing environment
3. High degrees of asset specificity among suppliers and risk sharing between customer and supplier alike
4. A maximum buy strategy by each company within the semi-permanent supplier network, but a maximum make strategy within these trusted networks
5. A high degree of bilateral design employing the skills and knowledge of both customers and suppliers alike
6. A high degree of supplier innovation in both new products and processes
7. Close, long-term relations between network members involving a high level of trust, openness and profit sharing
8. The use of rigorous supplier mapping and measurement increasingly giving way to supplier self-certification
9. A high level of supplier coordination by the customer company at each level of the tiered supply structure
10. A significant effort made by customers at each level individually to develop their suppliers
Measurement & Improvement
25 October, 2013© S A Partners
8. Supplier Measurement:
Current State Map
C/T = 1 secC/O = 20 minUptime = 70%27,000 secavEPE 10 Days
5 MonthForecast
Lead Time= 47 to 69daysVA Time =7262 sec(121 min)
C/T = 1 secC/O = 30 minUptime = 70%27,000 sec avEPE 10 Days
C/T = 13 minC/O = 0 minUptime = 85%2 shifts27,000 secav
C/T = 1 hourC/O =Uptime = 65%2 shifts27,000 secav
C/T = 9 minC/O = 0 minUptime = 85%2 Shifts27,000 secav
Tray = 14 off2 shifts
12,000pcs/mo
Coils3
Days
1200 Sec. 900 Sec. 1 Sec. 1 Sec. 780 Sec.
1.2 Days2 Days2 Days10 Daysto 32 Days
6 Days2 Days
II I I I I
VehicleAssembler
Blanking AssemblyPressing Paint Assembly DispatchSlit Dispatch
DailyOrderWithTimeslots
1 xhours
ShippingSchedule
2 shifts
Coils
SteelServiceCentre
3 MonthForecast
WeeklyOrder
FaxRevision
PRODN. CONTROL
WeeklyScheduleby Day
I I
Dispatch
I
Pack
I
Pickle
I
Hot roll
Iron & SteelMaking
C/T = 120 hrs(includescooling)
C/T = 15 minC/O = 10 min
C/T =4min/coilC/O = 45 minUptime = 55%2 shifts27,000 secav
WeeklySchedule
& Revisions
STEEL MILL SCHEDULING
Check vsProduction Plan
Check vsSales Plan
COMMERCIAL
Order (3months inadvance)
Promise(Negotiation)
Call off weeklyor by day
Revisions toMissed
Deliveries
IndividualSchedules
3 Days1 Day16 Days
240 Sec.
3 Days
3600 Sec. 540 Sec.
0.6 Days 0.27 Days
25 October, 2013© S A Partners
Future State Map
coil
tote
C/T = 1 secC/O = 5 minUptime = 85%27,000 secavEPE Day
Lead Time= 11.5daysVA Time =6902 sec
C/T = 1 secC/O = 5 minUptime = 85%27,000 sec avEPE Day
C/T = 60 minC/O = 0 minUptime = 65%2 Shifts27,000 secav
Tray = 14 off2 shifts
12,000pcs/mo
1200 Sec. 1 Sec. 1 Sec.
4 Hours1 Day1 Day
VehicleAssembler
Blanking Pressing DispatchSlit Dispatch
DailyOrderWithTimeslots
1 xhours
OXOX
2 shifts
Coils
SteelServiceCentre PRODN.
CONTROL
DispatchPackPickleHot roll
Iron & SteelMaking
C/T = 120 hrs(includescooling)RFT = 85%
C/T = 15 minC/O = 10 min
C/T =4min/coilC/O = 5 minUptime = 85%2 shifts27,000 secav
STEEL MILL SCHEDULING
Orders
1 Day 7 Days
1200 Sec.
1 Day
3600 Sec.
1 Day
141414
900 Sec.
600600600
ForecastTransmission(Supply Chain
Syvchronisation)
5 MonthForecast
14Assembly& Paint
14Batch
toteBatch
Coil600
DailyOrder
600600
coil
Coil600
F I F O
25 October, 2013© S A Partners
9. & 10. Category Management:
Supplier Coordination & Development
• A process where one partner in a relationship modifies or influences the behaviour of the other partner with a view to mutual benefit
– Supplier coordination - activities made by a customer to mould their suppliers into a common way of working so that competitive advantage can be gained particularly by the removal of inter-company waste
– Supplier development - activities made by the customer to help improve the strategies, tools and techniques employed by suppliers to improve their competitive advantage, particularly by removing intra-company waste
• Both of these are required simultaneously
25 October, 2013© S A Partners
Kyoryoku Kai
(Supplier Associations)
The Supplier Association may be defined as a mutually benefiting group of a company’s most important suppliers brought together on a regular basis for the purpose of strategic alignment, planning and operational improvement designed to produce world class standards of quality, cost, delivery and innovation.
25 October, 2013© S A Partners
The Logic of Supplier
Associations
• A team of a customer and key strategic suppliers
• Devolving strategy and policy through the supply
chain to create a common sense of purpose
• Strengthening trust and the relationship
• Sharing knowledge and expertise
• Developing and learning together
• Eliminating waste - non value added activities both
in and between firms
25 October, 2013© S A Partners
Toyota’s Kyoho kai
• Basic philosophy towards suppliers
– Long term relations
– Creation and maintenance of cooperative relations
– Multiple sourcing of parts
– Optimal make/buy ratio often weighted towards the
latter
25 October, 2013© S A Partners
Organisation of Tokai Kyoho Kai
Activities Frequency Description
General assembly 1 per year Election of board members, activities, budgets
Board meeting 6 per year Report/request from Toyota top management
Meeting with supplier senior staff
2 per year Development of close communications
Groups:
Cost
Quality
Safety
1 per month Improvement of suppliers’ management through process improvement
Section meeting:
1, 2, 3 1 per month
Improvement and development of communication and management
Others Kyoho news
25 October, 2013© S A Partners
• In your dealings with suppliers are you:
• Mostly Day to Day Activities?
• Mostly Organisation & Structure?
• Mostly Common Destiny & Relationship?
• Mostly Measurement & Improvement?
• A Good Balance?
• Please select one answer
Poll #3
25 October, 2013© S A Partners
• What further activity would you like?
• Please select one or more answers
Poll #4
25 October, 2013© S A Partners
• If you would like to discuss anything coming out of the webinar please contact me at: [email protected]
or +44 (0)7974 416660
• Please also link up with me at: uk.linkedin.com/in/profpeterhines/
• Or join me at my Lean Business System LinkedIn group: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/Lean-Business-System-1801885?trk=myg_ugrp_ovr
• See also the previous webinars at: http://www.sapartners.com/webinars-2/
Further Questions
25 October, 2013© S A Partners
• Accelerating Business Performance – How to create Culture of Business
Improvement, (Dublin, Belfast & London)
– Date: 14 November – Dublin, 15 November - Belfast, 2013
– http://www.sapartners.com/accelerating-business-performance-create-culture-
business-improvement/
– Date: 3 December - London, 2013
– http://www.sapartners.com/how-to-create-a-lean-culture/
– Learn • Share • Grow – Achieve Lean Excellence at Aimia Foods,
Haydock, UK)
– 16-17 January 2014
– http://www.sapartners.com/achieve-lean-excellence-event/
For further information please contact [email protected]
Or visit http://www.sapartners.com/uk-events/ for our full event schedule
European Events
25 October, 2013© S A Partners
• Lean Thinking *a 1 day introduction to Lean Principles .
Sydney, Brisbane, Adelaide and Melbourne in November 2013.
• Lean Team Member* a 4 day workshop for Lean Practitioners
Sydney 25-28 Nov 13, Brisbane 2-5 Dec 13 and Melbourne 9-12 Dec 13
• Lean Leadership a 2 day workshop for senior managers
Sydney 2-3 Dec 13 and Brisbane 9-10 Dec 13.
* Internationally recognised qualification accredited by Cardiff University
For further information contact Chris Butterworth on 0447783877,
[email protected] or visit our website
http://www.sapartners.com.au/australian-events/
Australian events