the politics and economics of international energy (spring 2009- e657)
DESCRIPTION
The Politics and Economics of International Energy (Spring 2009- E657). Lecture 4 The functioning of the international oil market Prof. Giacomo Luciani. Outline. Price formation: past and current regimes Prices, Supply and Demand The Market for Brent Details on the Futures Market - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
The Politics and Economics of International Energy
(Spring 2009- E657)Lecture 4The functioning of the international oil market
Prof. Giacomo Luciani
Outline
Price formation: past and current regimes Prices, Supply and Demand The Market for Brent Details on the Futures Market The Crude Oil Market: a Broader Picture Causes of volatility Fundamentals or speculation? Better benchmarks? Conclusion
Price Formation: Past and Current Regimes
© BP 2008
Chart of crude oil prices since 1981
Successive Price Regimes
Before 1880: “Disorder” in the US 1880-1910: the Standard Oil Trust Regime 1910-1930: Transition 1930-1970: the 7 Sisters Pricing Regime:
Posted prices controlled by the companies 1970-1985: the OPEC Pricing Regime:
Posted prices controlled by the producing countries
1985-87: the Netback Pricing Regime: Transition period
1987 to date: the Reference Pricing Regime
1970-85: The OPEC Price Regime
In 1970-85, prices were unilaterally determined by producers.
In the occasion of political crises, the market (illiquid and opaque) pushed prices higher, and producers consolidated the increases.
Saudi Arabia dissented from all others: the quest for a long-run equilibrium price.
Development of the Market in the 1980s
The Brent and WTI markets developed in the early 1980s
Non-OPEC supply responded vigorously to higher prices
The OPEC share was eroded, and Saudi production declined to little more than 3 million b/d.
In 1985, Saudi Arabia begins a price war.
1985-87: The Netback Pricing Regime
Netback pricing means that the price of crude is tied to the price of refined products.
Refined product prices are determined by product markets (e.g. Rotterdam).
The system lacks transparency and encourages products oversupply.
Weak prices – soon abandoned
After 1987: The Reference Pricing Regime
“Reference pricing” means that the price of a crude which is not freely traded is tied by some formula to the price of another crude which is freely traded.
The two main reference crudes are Brent and WTI (West Texas Intermediate)
Prices, Supply & Demand
The roots cause of oil price instability
Why are oil prices so unstable? (At times, because at other times they were “kept” very stable)
The key reason is that both supply AND demand are rigid to price changes in the short term.
(Demand appears to be more responsive to income than to price shifts)
Non-OPEC Supply Non-OPEC supply is competitive and price
responsive. However:
Production requires huge up front investment Direct costs are a small component of total costs As long as direct costs are paid, producers are
best off maximizing production In actual practice, non-OPEC production
cannot satisfy global demand and producers always maximize production.
OPEC must provide the difference – this is the “call on OPEC”.
OPEC Supply OPEC supply is limited by quotas, first
established in the 1980s. OPEC supply does not respond to prices
(except for “cheating”, which occurs anyway but is more tolerated if prices are high).
In fact, OPEC quotas are (unpredictably) modified to pursue a revenue or price objective.
If prices are high, production may be reduced because revenue targets are met anyhow – and vice versa.
Global Demand Demand too is price inelastic:
Oil satisfies essential needs Higher per capita income Concentration in transportation Taxes isolate consumers from the impact
of price changes. Demand is influenced primarily by
macro trends (income effect) and the weather.
Price
Vol
ume
Non-OPECOPEC
Demand and Supply are Rigid in the Short Term
AA’
P P’
However, in the longer run… Demand and (less so) supply are price elastic. Consumers will make the investment required
to reduce fuel consumption or switch to a different fuel.
On the supply side, companies’ cash flow improves, investment increases, new fields are developed.
However, higher prices may also encourage resource nationalism and slow down investment/production
The Market for Brent
The Market for Brent
Brent is a field in the UK North Sea. The market consists of:
A “spot” market; A “physical forward” market; A “futures” market – based at the
International Petroleum Exchange (IPE) in London
The spot market, or “dated Brent”
“Dated Brent” refers to the sale of a specific cargo that is either available in a specific loading slot or that is already loaded and in transit to some destination.
Main characteristics: Transactions are bilateral, Over the counter (OTC), For variable quantities.
The forward market, or “15-day Brent”
The 15-day cargo is a standard parcel (500,000 barrels) that will be made available by the seller to the buyer on an unspecified day of the relevant month.
The clearing involves book-outs or seller’s nominations, which can take place on any day in the period starting fifteen days before the beginning of the relevant month and closing eighteen days before its end.
As dated Brent, 15-day Brent is bilateral and OTC – but it is standardized.
The futures market The futures market was launched by the
International Petroleum Exchange (IPE – today International Commodity Exchange - ICE) in 1988
1 contract = 1000 barrels Contract based on cash settlement and not on
physical delivery If a contract is allowed to expire the settlement
price is the Brent index Central exchange and clearing house rather
than bilateral trades Several months traded
Details on the Futures Market
Options
Launched by the IPE in 1989 A call option gives the holder the right
to buy the underlying futures contract, and a put option the right to sell.
Call and put options may be combined to design complex risk management strategies.
What are options for?
Any buyer or seller on the petroleum market faces a price risk.
Options and futures allow parties facing a structural risk to limit that risk, “selling” it to speculators (or “insurers”).
Hedging A producer can sell futures or buy put
options to ensure a minimum level of prices.
A large consumer can buy futures or a call option to ensure against very high prices
Major companies are on both sides of the market and may be doing both things at the same time.
Complex Strategies
A producer can at the same time buy a put option and sell a call option: in the first step he acquires a guarantee of future revenue, in the second he gives up the extra profit from potential price peaks.
The purchase of a put is financed by the sale of a call. The combination of a put and a call is called a “collar”.
Why so many Paper Barrels?
Most participants in the futures market are there to manage their risk, not to acquire Brent crude.
Buying and selling Brent futures and options is an effective strategy because other crude prices follow Brent movements.
The Structure of the Oil Market At the center, we find the market for Brent
and WTI, which influence each other Brent and WTI trade few physical and lots of
paper barrels Paper and wet barrels influence each other,
but paper barrels are more important Smaller markets, such as ANS and Dubai,
are influenced by Brent and WTI
Other Crudes All other major crudes are priced on
the basis of formulas which tie them to Brent or WTI
The producing countries oppose the free trading of their crudes, and restrict destination and secondary trading
Formulas are modified from time to time, but the essence remains
Example: Saudi Arabia’s Prices for 04/09
How is the Market Cleared?
Brent/WTI are not the marginal crudes that balance demand and supply.
Yet, it is Brent/WTI that make the price.
The implication is that demand and supply are not necessarily balanced: OPEC and other operators manage supply and/or stocks, given the price.
The Feedback Issue Given this market structure, operators that
have no interest in Brent crude trade in Brent futures and options, to manage their risk
In this way, a certain feedback is obtained between the global physical oil market and Brent
However, such feedback is limited and partial The feedback would be greater if all operators hedged
systematically; in that case, an excess of demand would raise the price of calls, financial intermediaries would lower the price of puts, producers would be incentivated…
OPEC and Brent/WTI prices
OPEC has no direct control on Brent/WTI prices. It attempts to exert an influence through signaling and decisions on quotas.
But quotas are never fully implemented, and in any case are but one of the elements at play: Brent’s price response to quota shifts is unpredictable.
Other influences
Refined products markets also have a feedback on Brent and WTI, but the prevailing influence is in the opposite direction.
Except in the US and UK, the price of natural gas is also indexed to crude or products prices
Only the price of coal is truly independent of Brent and WTI
© BP 2008
Rotterdam product prices and Gulf Coast product prices
The Oil Market – A broader Picture
Why oil producing countries like reference pricing?
Accepting pricing out of a marker implies that producers are giving up on an important role
They should naturally be price makers, instead are price takers
Why? First and foremost because in the past they failed in the management of posted prices.
Setting up a market for a major crude, such as e.g. Arabian Light, is not easy because there is just one seller
The seller does not want the responsibility of making prices, because he is afraid of international political pressure or domestic dissension.
Why there is no Arabian Light market?
DTS/T, Friday 21 April 202340
FinancialFinancial
MarketsMarketsCommercial OperatorsCommercial Operators
& Independent Traders& Independent Traders
Over the CounterOver the Counter
(OTC) Derivatives(OTC) Derivatives
MarketsMarkets
FuturesFutures
MarketsMarketsPhysicalPhysicalMarketsMarkets
ForwardForwardMarketsMarkets
Oil ProductsOil ProductsMarketsMarkets
Non-tradedNon-tradedCrude oilsCrude oils
Natural GasNatural GasMarketsMarkets
Oil Prices - a increasingly complex market constellation
Modified by GL
Causes of Volatility
How can we explain this?ICE Brent Crude Oil Front Month
Main questions about prices
Why prices are where they are? Political instability “Paradigm shift” Speculation – flow of funds Unreliable benchmarks -volatility
Political instability Routine explanation It is normally quite easy to find a
political disturbance to which higher prices may be attributed: Iraq, Venezuela, Nigeria, today Turkey/Kurdistan…
But political instability is the norm, not the exception
Therefore, this interpretation is pretty useless ex ante
Paradigm shift
Prices are high and increasing because oil supply is tight
Beginning in 2004, markets signaled a paradigm shift by way of a protracted anomalous contango
Markets went back to backwardation in the summer of 2007
The Forward Curve
At any point in time, we have several prices for the same marker for different maturity future contracts.
If prices for subsequent months are lower than the closest-month price the market is said to be in backwardation
If prices for subsequent months are higher than the closest-month price the market is said to be in contango
Meaning of contango A contango occurs when the market
expects future prices to be higher than today’s
Normally, a contango occurs when prompt prices are low, backwardation when they are high
Backwardation is the “normal state” of a market because holding stocks has a physical and financial cost (interest rate)
What is the impact of backwardation/contango?
Contango encourages the buildup of physical stocks (you earn money by buying spot and selling futures, while holding the commodity)
Backwardation encourages financial commodity investors (you make money by buying futures and waiting for futures to converge to spot prices)
Aissaoui on backwardation The risks to oil market stability nowadays are
likely to be higher in backwardation than in contango. Even assuming a constant appreciation of spot prices (spot yield), the negative roll yields generated by contango tend to inhibit commodity investors. By contrast, the positive roll yields achieved in a backwardated market offer greater prospect of realizing higher returns. In such a case, a surge in commodity investments will only lead to more speculative activities and increase, as a result, the likelihood of renewed oil price spikes and greater volatility. Obviously, OPEC has no interest in such economically damaging oil price behaviour.
Speculation – flow of funds Investors move from one asset class
to another depending on the conditions of each market
As they shift from one asset class to another, they drive prices on one market down and on another market up
This is the “flow of funds” effect – it will last as long as funds are transferred between markets
January 28-29, 2002HESS ENERGY TRADING COMPANY, LLC
The International Investment Playing Field: Oil is a small piece
Source: ESAI
The Global Trillion Dollar Trading System
Equities Bonds Currencies CommoditiesReal Estate Other Interest Rate Instruments
Metals Agricultural Fuels Precious Metals
Heating Oil Gasoline Crude Oil Natural Gas Electricity
Support for flow of funds explanation
Mortgage crisis in US Weak dollar Unstable equities Prices have increased for all
commodities, not just oil Oil market is backwardated
Volatility Volatility is a challenge for all:
Producing countries face unstable revenues Companies face uncertainty in investment
decisions Consumers pay higher prices than would be
necessary to stimulate supply Volatility is caused by:
Price rigidity of oil supply and demand in short term
Prevailing influence of futures vs. physical trading
Benchmarks shortcomings
Instability and resonance The oil market is structurally unstable
because of the rigidity of demand and supply
Hedging and financial investors thrive on this underlying instability. Through their action, they tend to increase instability
This may be viewed as a kind of resonance
Momentum (finance)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia In finance, momentum is the empirically observed tendency for rising asset
prices to raise further. For instance, it was shown that stocks with strong past performance continue to outperform stocks with poor past performance in the next period with an average excess return of about 1% per month (Jegadeesh and Titman, 1993, 1999).
The existence of momentum is a market anomaly, which economic theory has been struggling to explain. The difficulty is that an increase in asset prices, in and of itself, should not warrant further increase. Such increase, according to efficient market theory, is warranted only by changes in demand and supply or new information (cf. fundamental analysis). Students of financial economics have largely attributed the appearance of momentum to cognitive biases, which belong in the realm of behavioral economics. The explanation is that investors are irrational (Daniel, Hirschleifer, and Subrahmanyam, 1998 and Barberis, Shleifer, and Vishny, 1998), in that they underreact to new information by failing to incorporate news in their transaction prices. However, much as in the case of price bubbles, recent research has argued that momentum can be observed even with perfectly rational traders (Crombez, 2001).
50
52
54
56
58
60
62
64
66
68
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 61
Trading with moving averages
WTI prices, January to March 2007: 3 and 6-day moving averages
Where is the damper? Resonance is contained if there is a
damper; if there is no damper, oscillations may widen indefinitely, until the system collapses.
Where is the damper in the oil market? Where is the limit to oscillations? What is the “tipping point”? Unless we have an answer, there will be no reversal of expectations
Attempts to launch new benchmarks
In 2007, two parallel attempts started to launch a new ME sour futures contract: NYMEX/DME Oman futures ICE ME sour futures
Oman supports the DME and will price its oil out of that contract
DME contract is physically deliverable
Fundamentals or Speculation?
Section III: Speculators were definitely active
Our estimate of investment flows to commodities (in US$ bn)
0
40
80
120
160Ja
n-87
Jan-
89
Jan-
91
Jan-
93
Jan-
95
Jan-
97
Jan-
99
Jan-
01
Jan-
03
Jan-
05
Jan-
07
Est'd cumulative funds flows into commodity indices (US$bn)
At these volumes, allocations matter immensely, when GSCI increase gasoline allocation by 3% this is 10-15% of all contracts
Source: BME, Goldman Sachs, DJ-AIG, Industry Documents, Nymex and Bloomberg
A confirmation from the futures exchange
Outstanding futures contracts exploded with prices
One contract is 1000 barrels. Over the past four years WTI alone has seen 3bn barrels of new futures contracts (new long or short)
2030405060708090100110120
Mar
-08
Jan-
08O
ct-0
7Ju
l-07
Apr
-07
Jan-
07N
ov-0
6A
ug-
May
-Fe
b-06
Dec
-05
Sep-
05Ju
n-05
Mar
-05
Jan-
05O
ct-0
4Ju
l-04
Apr
-04
Feb-
04N
ov-0
3A
ug-
May
-M
ar-0
3D
ec-0
2Se
p-02
WTI
$bb
l
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
Thousands of Contracts
Futures and Options WTI price (RHS)
“Open Interest” WTI Crude
At times prices can overshoot physical fundamentals
The past 6 months are critical example of how intimately linked physical fundamentals and prices are
$30
$50
$70
$90
$110
$130
$150
Jan-07 Apr-07 Jul-07 Oct-07 Jan-08 Apr-08 Jul-08
-7
0
7
14
21
28
35
Brent 1-6 differential Brent spot
Brent $/b
Source: Bloomberg, UBS
Part V: The second fundamental driver – costsBoth oil companies…
21222324252627282
1994 1997 2000 2003 2006 2009E 2012E
Oil
pric
e (U
S$/b
)
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Ope
ratin
g co
sts
(US$
/boe
)
Oil price Operating costs
1998
1999
2004
2000
2003
2002
20011997
20052006
2007E
2012E2008E
2011E2010E2009E
0.00%
2.00%
4.00%
6.00%
8.00%
10.00%
12.00%
14.00%
16.00%
18.00%
0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00
Oil price (US$/b)
IRR
Higher prices for the same rates of return
72
The price rise is rooted in fundamentals: Prices rose exponentially, as a result of lost OPEC output and rising demand, triggering: a demand response, capex for new supply, resource nationalism, and even higher prices
In Soft Markets, Inventories Count; in Tight Markets, Capacity Counts
________________Source: U.S. DOE/EIA; LCMC Estimates.
Annual % Change in Real Oil Price
Annual OPEC Capacity Utilisation 1972–2008
(50%)
0%
50%
100%
150%
200%
50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
1987
1986 19981991
1973 / 1974
Forward Days Consumption in
Inventories Drive Price
Spare Capacity Drives Price
2003-2008
73
But flows played a major role in exacerbating the situation : Ccost inflation cannot explain price rise of 2007-08PPI data appear to explain oil prices well until the divergence in Oct-2007. Recently, there has been a convergence, with September 2008 data suggesting $81 for deferred prices.
Average monthly 5-yr out WTI prices regressed on cost indicators
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
De
c-0
3
Ma
r-0
4
Jun
-04
Se
p-0
4
De
c-0
4
Ma
r-0
5
Jun
-05
Se
p-0
5
De
c-0
5
Ma
r-0
6
Jun
-06
Se
p-0
6
De
c-0
6
Ma
r-0
7
Jun
-07
Se
p-0
7
De
c-0
7
Ma
r-0
8
Jun
-08
5-year out Dec WTIFitted WTI w PPI costsFitted WTI w PPI DW costsFitted WTI w PPI DW DXY
Aug-08$114.90
$80.92$79.80$88.21
$/bbl
A recent convergence of pricesto levels implied by cost indicators.
- R-squared through Oct-07 is 95%
74
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
HIGH OIL PRICE STIMULATES: BIOFUELS, UNCONVENTIONAL OIL, EOR AND NEW FRONTIERS
Even so, the marginal cost of supply was changing
OPEC Middle East
FSU
EOR
CtL
Other OPECOther Conventional Oil Venezuelan
Heavy Oil
ArticDeep Water
Biofuels ( Sugar Cane Based)
Oil Sands (mining)
Oil Shale
Oil Sands (In-Situ)
GtL
Biofuels US (Corn Based)
Renewable PowerConventional
Power
US$/
bbl
Million Barrels of Oil Equivalent per Day
Conventional liquid sources
Non-conventional liquid sources
Emerging sources of transportation energy
Source: Booz Allen/IEA - Assumed average vs. marginal costs; 10% return for conventional and 13% return for unconventional technologies; no subsides for biofuels; no carbon offset costs; after severance and production taxes
Producing basins by marginal cost
Base marginal cost used to be $10 to 20, unconventional oil sands push to $90, now what?
75
Financial Activity: Trading Crude Oil Boomed Until this YearDaily trading volume on NYMEX crudes is over 6 times total global consumption; Trading volume on ICE crudes is over 5 times total global consumption.
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
m bbl/d
Trading Volume on NYMEX Trading Volume on ICE
World Crude Oil Consumption
Add OTC trading and the daily trading volume may be >20 time global production
Daily Trading Volume in WTI and Brent Crude Oil on NYMEX and ICE vs. World Oil Consumption
76
Ultimately, Four Factors Explain Price Changes– Long-term structures
• Adequacy of capital asset base / spare capacity: benign for next two-three years
– Short-term market forces
• Supply, demand, inventory, weather and level of economic growth: bearish for next two-three years
– Politics and geopolitics
• OPEC’s ability to defend a price floor, risk of a disruption
• Saudi Arabia’s ability to protect it’s preferred ceiling: bearish for next two to three years
– Flow of funds into/out of commodity investments
• No doubt, fund flows grew in importance as market tightened
• Deleveraging has curtailed the impact of fund flows, but what happens when deleveraging is over?
• Will fund flows/higher corporate risk management, with lower open interest have a more pronounced impact?
• With re-emergence of exchange traded oil, products, natural gas, will transparency create more/less volatility?
Better Benchmarks?
Confidential
Benchmark peculiarities
Edward L. MorseChief Energy EconomistLehman BrothersJune 2007
Benchmark peculiarities
WTI landlocked; refinery maintenance and Canadian upstream disproportionately affect world’s most liquid benchmark
Brent waterborne, but limited volumes, field maintenance and quality control affect world’s second most liquid benchmark
Both WTI and Brent are light sweet benchmarks in a world where most crude is medium or heavy sour
Platts Dubai (and ICE Dubai) is based on easily influenced partial contracts, though it can function in concert with Platts Oman
DME Oman so far suffers from lack of liquidity and insufficient interest from Middle Eastern OPEC term sellers and Asian term refinery buyers
Each benchmark diverges from global supply-demand dynamics in different ways, opening up interesting trading opportunities
1
WTI-Brent: A broken relationship
Dec 28, 2005
May 24, 2007
May 1, 2006
August 31,2007
$55
$56
$57
$58
$59
$60
$61
$62
$63
$64
1M 5M 9M 13M 17M 21M 25M 29M
WTI Brent
$69
$70
$71
$72
$73
$74
$75
$76
$77
$78
1M 5M 9M 13M 17M 21M 25M 29M
WTI Brent
$65
$66
$67
$68
$69
$70
$71
$72
$73
$74
$75
1M 5M 9M 13M 17M 21M 25M 29M
WTI Brent
$58
$60
$62
$64
$66
$68
$70
$72
$74
1M 5M 9M 13M 17M 21M 25M 29M
WTI Brent________________Source: Reuters
2
WTI local factors sometimes matter most
Chicago and Cushing used to be the arbiters of international and mid-continent crude oil
– Main continental sources of crude are WTI/WTS and Canadian imports
– Waterborne crudes come up Capline or Seaway
The arbitrage dynamic is failing with respect to WTI
________________Source: Canadian National Energy Board
CaplineSeaway
3
What’s changed?
Light sweet waterborne crude prices will likely act as a ceiling to US and Canadian light sweet inland crudes (ignoring freight). And Canadian flows into the mid-continent continue to increase — they are up 700k b/d over the past decade, and 140k b/d (12.5%) in 2006.
Canadian barrels have displaced international barrels in western PADD 2
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
2011
2013
2015
m b/d
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3m b/d
Conventional (lhs) NGLs (lhs)Tar sands (lhs) Canada exports to PADD 2 (rhs)
Canadian oil production adding 150k b/d per annum with no where to go but PADD 2
________________Includes exports through PADD 4Source: EIA, Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers, Lehman Brothers Estimates
4
Midwest refineries plagued by unplanned outages
________________Note: Unplanned outages for US mid-continent crude distillation units since 01 Jan 07Source: Lehman Brothers estimates
Cushing
Tulsa, OK: power outage
•6-7 Feb, 16-22 Mar, 65k b/d for 9 days
•6-7 May, 85k b/d for 2 days
McKee, TX: fire
•16 Feb-20 Jun, 60k b/d for 125 days
•16 Feb-12 Apr, 105k b/d for 56 days
Whiting, IN: fire
•22 Mar-End Aug, 90k b/d for 5+ mos.
•22 Mar-02 Jul, 90k b/d for 103 days
•09 Jul-15 Jul, 260k b/d for 7 days
Toledo, OH: power outage
•25 Apr-18 May, 110k b/d for 24 days
Wynnewood, OK: fire
•27 Apr-04 May, 35k b/d for 8 days
•27 Apr-09 May, 17k b/d for 13 days
Coffeyville, KS: flood
•01 Jul-Mid Sep: 100k b/d for 2+ mos.
Lima, OH: fire
•19 Jul-06 Aug: 170k b/d for 19 days
5
WTI seasonal weakness: likely to happen again
The 2007 US refinery maintenance season begins with significantly more refineries down compared to fall 2006.
– As of September 1, 2007 there are nearly five times as many planned outages as in 2006 Current record levels of capacity offline combined with expectations for strong mid-continent refinery maintenance
may result in significant inventory builds at Cushing, OK. High margin environment and tightening product specs have strained refineries and caused systemic restart delays,
making unplanned outages a significant threat.
US turnarounds, particularly in PADD 2, make WTI more susceptible to weakness during turnaround seasons than Brent or Dubai
US refinery turnarounds, 2006-07 Unplanned refinery outages, 2004-07
050
100150200250300350400450500
1-J
an
15-J
an
29-J
an
12-F
eb
26-F
eb
11-M
ar
25-M
ar
8-A
pr
22-A
pr
kb/d
Fall' 04 Fall '06 Fall '07 allow ance
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1-S
ep
15-S
ep
29-S
ep
13-O
ct
27-O
ct
10-N
ov
24-N
ov
8-D
ec
22-D
ec
kb/d
2006 total outages 2007F total outages
6
Brent, meanwhile, suffers from North Sea field declines
North Sea production is no longer traded internationally in large volume. African grades tied to Brent better reflect global markets. North Sea crude production has been declining at over 5% per year or at least 200k b/d annually Geopolitical risks of disruption in Nigeria and Middle East affect waterborne crudes more than WTI
– OPEC cuts have also put strain on Asian markets, which forces African grades to move east instead of west
– East-West competition for African grades (due to faster Asian demand growth and OPEC cuts) puts more upward pressure on Brent than WTI, since African crudes trade at a differential to Brent
Partially offsetting relatively greater Brent tightness is the continued ramp-up of FSU output
– A reversal of OPEC cuts could have a similar effect
North Sea total oil production and exports to US, 1999-2006
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
5,500
6,000
6,500
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
k b/d
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
k b/d
UK exports to US (rhs) Norw ay exports to US (rhs)
UK + Norw ay Production (lhs)
7
________________Source: UK Dept of Trade and Industry, Norwegian Petroleum Directorate
Brent versus other benchmarks (cont.)Seasonality in Brent prices linked to both upstream maintenance and light product demand Any major field maintenance can change the sulfur quality of BFOE
– Platts instituted a sulfur de-escalator but it only kicks in if sulfur levels move above 0.6%
– Refiners which are unsure about the quality of the crude oil they receive will tend to discount BFOE versus the rest of the market
Field maintenance in the North Sea occurs at different times every summer, generally tightening light-sweet balances and increasing the Brent-Dubai spread
Summer demand peak for gasoline also can contribute to a wider Brent-Dubai spread
Brent-Dubai Spread: Summer peaks caused by field maintenance and demand seasonality
________________Source: Bloomberg
7/17/07, 7.22
8/8/06, 6.14
8/31/05, 9.12
10/27/04, 13.61
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
De
c-0
3
Ma
r-0
4
Jun
-04
Se
p-0
4
De
c-0
4
Ma
r-0
5
Jun
-05
Se
p-0
5
De
c-0
5
Ma
r-0
6
Jun
-06
Se
p-0
6
De
c-0
6
Ma
r-0
7
Jun
-07
8
Platts Dubai has its own peculiarities
Platts Dubai is based on 90k b/d Dubai declining oil production. Means only four cargoes per month available– Two companies responsible for most traded cargoes, giving them asymmetric
influence over pricing, mostly to the detriment of producers Dubai currently used with Platts Oman as underlying crude price for most major term
contracts between Middle Eastern producers and eastern refiners– Dubai crude (30.4º gravity, 2.13% sulfur) approximates Saudi Light (32.7º, 1.8%
sulfur)– Eastern refiner crack hedges also based on Dubai
Refiners have incentive to sell Platts Dubai during the Platts window, depressing the price of the benchmark on which their term contracts are based– If a refiner is short, the two firms prominent in the trade can push Dubai prices up to
higher quality Platts Oman prices (also deliverable against Platts Dubai)– Producers could also influence the price higher if they desired– If ICE Dubai became liquid, it would just create an additional incentive to influence
the Platts Dubai price at ICE Dubai settlement
Dubai is the least transparent and most easily influenced benchmark
9
DME Oman has yet to take off
DME based on 800k b/d Oman production Oman crude (33.34º gravity, 1.04% sulfur) also approximates Saudi Light For the contract to be successful, it needs aggressive buyers and sellers, as well as
a strong market making program Obstacles:
– Not going to be significant producer hedging (Non-OPEC oil hedged with WTI and Brent, unlikely to change until DME already successful)
– Refiners will only be aggressive sellers of DME if their term contracts are based on DME versus Platts Dubai/Oman
– Saudi Arabia would likely have to assign some production to price off of the DME before the contract can become successful
– Moving in the wrong direction: Qatar is de-linking its crude from the DME
– Refiners still have huge remaining crack hedge positions on Platts Dubai
Until key Middle Eastern suppliers switch to DME, the exchange may not attract sufficient liquidity to be successful
10
Potential revolutionary impact if DME Oman succeeds
Oil market could have a successful sour contract that could replace WTI/Brent as more representative
Asian buyers would find good reasons to use DME Oman for hedging long-haul purchases and for refinery margin hedging
Would require all Middle East producers to understand market mechanisms that their customers prefer, may induce some to manage their market exposure through the DME
Could eliminate “Asian Premium” that has characterized Middle East ‘delivered’ crude sales, reduce sour/sweet spreads
Would bring pricing back to Gulf where most of world’s reserves and incremental production are located
11
Benchmark relationships could radically change with refinery investment
In the aftermath of the 2005 hurricanes we ran out of spare refining capacity, but investments made since oil prices began rising early this decade should cause refinery capacity additions to outpace demand growth in 2009 by as much as 2:1
Refinery investment has stagnated for a generation, but 2009-10 could be a turning point, especially East of Suez
Global CDU CapacityAdditions (k b/d)
Global UpgradingCapacity Additions (k b/d)(1)
________________Source: Lehman Brothers Estimates.1. Includes coking, catalytic cracking, and hydrocracking units and expansions.
3,108
1,596
2,459
2,832
1,678
1,005
1,667
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
China South Asia Middle East Rest of World
809704
1,152
1,599
1,284
960
1,116
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012China South Asia Middle East Rest of World
12
Light-heavy spreads to narrow as a result
Current environment holds upside potential for light sweet benchmarks and light-heavy spreads
– As complex refineries break down, more simple crude capacity than what was lost is needed to manufacture the same amount of refined light product
• Most likely the additional crude demanded by the simple refineries will be light sweet
But as the downstream bottleneck is eroded, so should the light-heavy crude oil premium erode
As the downstream bottleneck is eroded, so should the light-heavy premium erode
13
Conclusions
Conclusions Oil markets are not straightforward, not
what most people think The markets perform a fundamental
functions but have serious shortcomings Markets are perfectible but any change will
affect some very large interests and is therefore difficult
Looking for feasible changes that will improve the stability and transparency of the markets is an important priority
A new price regime? There is widespread dissatisfaction
with the current price regime An agreed target price? Curbing of “speculators”? Better benchmarks? Or more physical trading of the main
crude oil streams? I believe the latter is the answer, but
implementation is difficult.
Physical vs. Paper
Increasing the weight of physical trading vs. paper trading may limit oscillations because physical excess supply or demand will be visible and will contribute to reversing expectations in the paper market.
The final outcome depends on the behavior of the physical market
Controlled auctions Major producers could organize auctions in such a way
that they would influence prices (this is done through establishing a demand curve and then setting quantity to be sold, thus determining the price).
As a border case of the above procedure, major producers could simply fix (post) a price. However, if they did so not price discovery mechanism would be in place.
The combination of a free secondary market with controlled auctions for primary sales probably offers the best compromise between price discovery and an effective damper.