the organisation of the collection of municipal waste jean-pierre hannequart directeur général...
TRANSCRIPT
THE ORGANISATION
OF THE COLLECTION
OF MUNICIPAL WASTE
Jean-Pierre HannequartDirecteur Général IBGE / President ACR+
KIEV, 26 november 2013
PLAN
• WHY TO COLLECT ?• MINIMUM LEGAL FRAMEWORK• KEY- TECHNICAL ORGANISATIONAL ASPECTS • FINANCIAL ASPECTS/COSTS- FUNDING• MSW COLLECTION PERFORMANCE
WHY TO COLLECT HSW?
• Public health• Environment (pollution +ressources)• Socio-Economic development
WASTE COLLECTION JOBS / THE CASE OF BELGIUM Public sector - Private sector•BRUX. 890 806 84•WALLON. 1410 1127 283•FLANDRE 3481 2061 1420
•TOTAL 5781
MINIMUM LEGAL FRAMEWORK (a)
• Repartition of Responsabilities• Management Obligations• Costs Imputation • Minimum Separate Collection Obligations
REPARTITION OF RESPONSABILITIES :
The principle of local authorities competence ( with the help-planning of regional and/or
national authorities)
The municipality should determine appropriate roles for the public and private sectors.The collection system may be operated by (1) a municipal department, (2) a contracted private firm or firms, or (3) a combination of public and private haulers.Regardless of the management options chosen, a clear organizational structure and repartition of responsabilities should be developed…by MUNICIPAL AUTHORITIES
MINIMUM LEGAL FRAMEWORK (b)
MANAGEMENT OBLIGATION (cfr art.15§1)
… any original waste producer or other holder carries out the treatment of waste himself or has the treatment handle by a dealer or an establishment or undertaking which carries out waste treatment operations or arranged by a private or public waste collector
MINIMUM LEGAL FRAMEWORK (c)
COSTS IMPUTATION / cfr ART.14 Directive 2008/98 :…the costs of waste management shall be borne by the original waste producer or by the current or previous waste holders.
Member States may decide that the costs of waste management are to be borne partly or wholly by the producer of the product from which the waste came and that the distributors of such product may share these costs.
MINIMUM LEGAL FRAMEWORK (d)
SEPARATE COLLECTION OBLIGATIONS
/cfr Art. 11/Directive 2008/98: … by 2015 separate collection shall be set up for at least the
following: paper, metal, plastic and glass.
…subject to technical, environmental & economical practicability
Art. 22: MS shall take measures, as appropriate,…to encourage the separate collection of bio-waste with a view to the composting and digestion…« Bio-waste » =biodegradable garden and park
waste, food and kitchen waste…and comparable waste from food processing plants
MINIMUM LEGAL FRAMEWORK (e)
SPECIFIC COLLECTION/RECYCLING TARGET :WEEE : 4KG/inhab/year (Dir.2002/96)
BATTERIES : 25% in 2012 and 45% in 2016 (Dir.2006/66)
---- (PACKAGING : recycling rate of 55-80% in 2008
- minimum 60% for glass and for paper-cardboard - minimum 50% for metal - minimum 22,5% for plastic - minimum 15% for wood
(Dir.1994/62 modifiée par 2004/12)
MINIMUM LEGAL FRAMEWORK (f)
KEY ORGANISATIONNAL ASPECTS (a)
• Bins / Bags / Containers• Collection vehicules• Point and frequency of collection• Collection routes• Storage/Treatment• Labour management (informal sector/ social
economy)• Citizens involment• …
Event Title, Date
KEY ORGANISATIONNAL ASPECTS(b)
NUMBER AND CATEGORIES OF SEPARATION AT SOURCE:-GLASS / PAPER -PACKAGING (PLASTIC-METAL-BEVERAGE CARTONS)…AND SIMILAR MATERIALS-BIOWASTE -BULKY ( TEXTILES / WEEE / FURNITURE /OTHERS-PRODUCTS WASTE
FINANCIAL ASPECTS / COSTS (a)
Cost for Municipal Waste Management in France 2010 (Euros/tonnes):•Full cost : 214•Technical cost : 204
Cost Repartition:-Treatment :42%-Collection :48%
Event Title, Date
FINANCIAL ASPECTS /COSTS (b)
Cost of Residual Waste Collection – Euro/HHLD (EUNOMIA) URB RUR GE 30 40 GR 32 57 UK 31 45
Event Title, Date
FINANCIAL ASPECTS /COSTS (c)
Waste Cost (62 French Medium Cities) Low High Medium Door to Door 49 162 117Déchetterie 49 129 86Landfilling 48 95 74Incineration 73 133 98 (-5)Storting for Recyc. 80 309 162 (-211)
There is a choice of funding methods :-property taxes-waste service fees -user-based fees-PAYT / REP
FINANCIAL ASPECTS / FUNDING (a)
Splitting of tariffs· Partly Stable income· Prevention adverse effects
Billing Parameters· Volume· Frequency· Weight
Container dependent systems· Bags : stickers or pay-bags· Individual bins : size or weight
• many different systems of “ PAY AS YOU TROW”
FINANCIAL ASPECTS / FUNDING (b)
WHAT IS THE PRODUCERS’ CONTRIBUTION ? …WITH THE BELGIAN EPR SYSTEM FOR HOUSEHOLD
PACKAGING (FOSTPLUS)
/ million Euro 2011Packaging Responsible/ 64
Value of material
for recycling /64
128 105 : for collection and sorting 10: General
5,5 : for Regional Authority expenses
5,5 : for communication FostPlus
1,5 : for prevention / quality control
MSW COLLECTION PERFORMANCE (a)
• AUSTRIA• GERMANY• BELGIUM• NETHERLANDS• SWEDEN
• PORTUGAL• GREECE
• 70%• 66%• 60%• 60%• 55%
• 20%• 18%
2009RECYCLINGRATE
11/02/2009 20
Source : EUROSTAT (2007)
PACKAGING RECYCLING IN THE EU
MSW COLLECTION PERFORMANCE (b)
GRAPHICPAPER
COLLECTIONRATE 2008
• SUEDE : 85%• ALLEMAGNE 75%• UK 69%• ESPAGNE 64%• BELGIQUE 59%• FRANCE 48%
Source:Ernst and Young /Benchmark collecte des fibreux /mars 2011
MSW COLLECTION PERFORMANCE (c)
GLASS COLLECTION
FOR RECYCLING
(2010)
• EU-27 : 67%• Belgium 95%• Bulgaria 34%• France 67%• Germany 81%• Spain 56%
Etc….cfr « www.feve.org/StatsFolder
MSW COLLECTION PERFORMANCE (d)
LOOK AT LRAS PERFORMANCES
MSW COLLECTION PERFORMANCE
