401 East State Street, PO Box 402 Trenton, NJ 08625-0402

IATF.RIALS (609)292-2885

_'_IANAGEMENT

TEAM

Christine Todd Whitman

Governor, State of New Jersey

Steven J. Corodemus, Chairman

Assemblyman, District 11 GO VERNOR WHITMAN'SChairmcm, NJ General A,_:_embly Environment,

Science wtd Technology Committee

James E. Benton, Executive Director

DREDGED MATERIALSLillian Borron% Director, Port Department

MANAGEMENT TEAMJames A. Capo, President

NY Shipping Association, Inc.

Albert Cernadas, Exec. Vice-President

hstL Longshoremen's Association

Mauro Checchio RECOMMENDATIONSChainnan, The Union County Alliance

Angela Cristini, Ph.D. ON THE

Ramapo College of NJ

Sally Dudley, Executive Director

Association of NJ Enviromnental Contotissions

Joseph n. Kyrillos, Jr. Interim Report of theSenator, District 13

Frank M. MeDonough, Esq.

Director, Maritime Resources USA CE

M. Brian Maher, President DREDGED MATERIALSMaher 7"erminals, hlc.

,ewisJ_a_r,A.istan,Commi.,onor MANAGEMENT PLANNJ Dept. of Environmental Protection

Edward T. O'Connor, Jr.Senator, District 31

Dennis J. Suszkowskl, Ph.D.

Ho_bon River Foundation fiJr Science &Environmental Research, Inc.

James T. B. Tripp, Esq.Enviromoental Defense Fund, Inc.

Robert K. Tucker, Ph.D.

Ecopolicy Center, Rutgers University

Cynthia A. Zipf, Executive Director

Clean Ocean Action JANUARY, 1998

GOVERNOR WHITMAN'SDREDGED MATERIALS MANAGEMENT TEAM

REVIEW OF THE USACEDREDGED MATERIALS MANAGEMENT PLAN

L INTRODUCTION

The Dredged Materials Management Team (DMMT or the Team) was created in June, 1994 as atask force established by Governor Christine Todd Whitman to identify short-term solutions for the non-ocean disposal of contaminated dredged material from the Port of New York and New Jersey.Assemblyman Steven J. Corodemus (Legislative District 11 and Chairman of the NJ General AssemblyEnvironment, Science & Technology Committee) was appointed Chairman of this Task Force. Members

include: representatives of the scientific, environmental, labor, port, and business communities.

The Dredged Materials Management Team issued a final report in February 1996, entitled,Dredging: What is the Best Approach for New ers_._.y.2,and several recommendations in that report havebeen implemented. These include:

a. creation of a subaqueous confined disposal facility (pit) in Newark Bay,

b. creation of upland containment at OENJ, in Elizabeth, NJ,c. establishment of innovative short-term strategies at Bayway Refinery,

d. expediting and streamlining of permitting procedures, ande. appointment of a Director of Maritime Resources (Frank M. McDonough) to overseedredging operations throughout the state.

The Team continued to meet regularly since that time to oversee implementation of its

recommendations and to pursue longer-term management strategies for contaminated dredged materials.

During April, 1997, Governor Whitman issued a directive to the Dredged Materials ManagementTeam to review the U.S. Army Corps of Engineer's (USACE) _ Materials Management Plan

(DMMP) for the Port of New York and New Jersey (Interim Report, September, 1996) and makerecommendations to her within a six-month time period. The Governor also adopted a general policy that

precludes siting of dredged materials disposal facilities near "homes, schools and places of worship" inNew Jersey. She further announced her opposition to the siting of a nearshore containment island fordredged materials in Zone 1, located off Keansburg, New Jersey due to habitat and water quality issues.

This report concludes the work of the DMMT to date and includes the Team's consensusrecommendations regarding the Interim Report of the DMMP. However, it should be noted that the statesof New York and New Jersey have completed a Joint Dredging Plan for the Port of New York and NewJersey. This plan is being cooperatively implemented by both states, their respective environmental andeconomic development agencies, and the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey.

II. SUMMAR Y OF THE DMMP

The stated mission of the USACE DMMP for the Port of New York and New Jersey is to bring

together a unified plan, regionally supported, to meet the dredged material management needs of theHarbor/Estuary in environmentally useful and economic ways. The goal is to facilitate dredging activities

in the Port in an environmentally sound manner. In order for the Port of NY/NJ to remain competitive,

dredging to a depth of 50 feet may be necessary in the near future to accommodate deeper draft vessels andto ensure that the Port will remain as the premier East Coast cargo port into the 21st century.

In reviewing the plan, the DMMT considered recent developments at the federal level with respectto dredged materials disposal. On August 28, 1997, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

promulgated a final rule that de-designated the New York Bight Dredged Material Disposal Site (alsoknown as the Mud Dump Site) and simultaneously designated the Historic Areas Remediation Site

(HARS). The HARS will be remediated with uncontaminated dredged materials (i.e. dredged materialsthat meet current Category I standards and will not cause significant undesirable effects including throughbioaccumulation). This HARS material will cap contaminated sediments that are already at the site due to

previous disposal activities. To date, clean red clay material from the Newark Bay CDF and clean sand forcapping have been placed as part of the HARS program.

At the regularly scheduled June 1997 DMMT meeting, the USACE made an initialpresentation regarding the DMMP to Team members. Major disposal and management alternativesconsidered in the Interim Report of the DMMP include ocean disposal, containment islands, containmentareas, subaqueous pits, upland disposal, habitat creation/restoration, decontamination technologies,sediment reduction, ocean disposal with geobags, and pit disposal with geobags. The attached table (A)

lists these management alternatives provided to the Team for review prior to the date of this report.

At a subsequent meeting in August, 1997, the USACE indicated that several disposal sites anddisposal alternatives had been eliminated or modified from consideration by the federal government after

initial public comments. The sites that were excluded or modified at that time included:

Excluded options:

OD- 1: Disposal at the Mud Dump SiteOD-2: Ocean Disposal at the Mud Dump Site with cappingCI-la: Containment Island in Zone 1, NJ Sheet Pile Cofferdam without pit

CI-lb: Containment Island in Zone 1, NJ Sheet Pile Cofferdam with pitCI-lc: Containment Island in Zone 1, NJ Stone/Armor Embankment with pitUD-I: Upland Disposal at Site 159, Bergen County (Leonia)UD-2: Upland Disposal at Site 161, Bergen County (Moonachie)

UD-4: Upland Disposal at Site 184, Middlesex CountyUD-8: Upland Disposal at Site 214, Monmouth County (Shrewsbury)

Modified options:

CI-2a: Containment Island in Zone 2, NY/NJ Sheet Pile Cofferdam without pit

CI-2b: Containment Island in Zone 2, NY/NJ Sheet Pile Cofferdam with pitCI-2c: Containment Island in Zone 2, NY/NJ Stone/Armor Embankment with pitCI-3a: Containment Island in Zone 3, US Sheet Pile Cofferdam without pitCI-3b: Containment Island in Zone 3, US Concrete Caisson Embankment

SP- 1: New Subaqueous pit Zone 1, NJ Lower BaySP-2: New Subaqueous pit in Zone 1, NY/NJ Lower BayUD-5: Upland Disposal at Site 187, Middlesex County (Raritan Arsenal)UD-6: Upland Disposal at Site 190, Middlesex County (Edgeboro Landfill)UD-7: Upland Disposal at Site 193, Monmouth County (Belford)

The DMMT concurred with the USACE to exclude these options for contaminated sedimentmanagement. It is important to note that the USACE Interim Report is a "working document" andcontinues to be revised as sediment management alternatives are studied. During the course of the Team'sreview, management alternatives were added, deleted, renumbered, or revised. Several drafts of

alternatives are included as Tables A, B, C, and D at the end of this report. The USACE recently released

a Progress Report regarding the DMMP on January 7, 1998. A final DMMP is scheduled to be completedin the Fall, 1998. Therefore, the Team considered the original management options as well as someoptions identified in "draft alternatives lists."

For the purposes of this review, the DMMT also disregarded sites that were located in uplandareas and waterways solely in New York:

CA- 1: New Containment Area in Atlantic Basin, NY

SP-3: New Subaqueous Pit at Bowery Bay, NYSP-4: New Subaqueous Pit at Bay Ridge Flats, NY

SP-8: Existing Large East Bank Subaqueous Pit, NYSP-9: Existing Small East Bank Subaqueous Pit, NYSP-10: Existing West Bank Subaqueous Pit, NYSP-11: Existing CAC Subaqueous Pit, NYUD-9: Upland Disposal at Site 235, Richmond County, NY

UD-10: Upland Disposal at Cold Spring Quarry, NYUD- 11: Upland Disposal at Cedar Cliff Quarry, NYUD-12: Upland Disposal at Clinton Point Quarry, NYUD-13: Upland Disposal at Brigham Brickyard Quarry, NYUD-14: Upland Disposal at Cementon Quarry, NYUD- 15: Upland Disposal at Ravens Quarry, NYSR- 1: Sediment Reduction at Port Chester, NYSR-2: Sediment Reduction at Flushing Bay, NY

SR-6: Sediment Reduction at Bay Ridge/Red Hook Channels, NY

Management alternatives located in NY waters will be discussed by members of the NY/NJ Joint

Dredging Plan team. The NY/NJ Joint Dredging Plan for the Port of New York and New Jersey wasdeveloped by the two states to accomplish two major objectives vital to the maintenance of regionalnavigational assets. These objectives are:

1) to promote greater certainly and predictability in dredging project review process, and dredged materialmanagement; and

2) to facilitate effective long-term environmentally sound management strategies for addressing dredging

and disposal needsfor the region.

IlL SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The following chart summarizes management options included in the DMMP Interim Report withTeam recommendations; it also includes recommendations for management options that have beensuggested by the USACE in the progress revort (attached) for the USACE DMMP Alternatives Summary.A more detailed discussion of certa/n DMMP alternatives follows the chart.

The DMMT used the following criteria to screen options proposed in the DMMP:

• Environmental concerns,• Human health risks,

• Cost,• Feasibility,• Agency approval, and• Local government support.

DMMP MANAGEMENT ALTERNATIVES

ID # Management _ Status Team ResponseAlternative

O___ANALTERNATIVES:

OD-1 Ocean Disposalat the US Site closedto contaminatedsedimentMud Dump site disposal

OD-2 Ocean Disposalat the US Site closedto contaminatedsedimentMud Dumpsite with disposalcapping

OD-3/OR-1 Ocean Remediationat US (HARS) Remediationunderway SupportcontinuedHARSHistoricArea remediationRemediationSite

CONTAINMENT

ISLANDALTERNATIVES:

Cl-la ContainmentIslandin NJwaters (off Not underconsiderationby DMMT dueZone 1, NJ Sheet Pile Keansburg) to GovernorWhitman'sdirectiveandCofferdam withoutpit removal by USACE from consideration.

Cl-lb Containment Island in (same as (same as above)Zone 1, NJ Sheet pile above)Cofferdam with pit

Cl-lc Containment Island in (same as (same as above)Zone 1, NJ Stone/Armor above)Embankment with pit

CI-2a Containment Island in NY/NJ Zone 2 is modified (see below)Zone 2, Sheet PileCofferdam without pit

CI-2b Containment Island in NY/NJ Zone 2 is modified (see below)Zone 2, NY/NJ SheetPile Cofferdam with pit

CI-2c Containment Island in NY/NJ Zone 2 is modified (see below)Zone 2, NY/NJStone/ArmorEmbankment with pit

CI-3a Containment Island in US Zone 3 is modified (see below)Zone 3, US, Sheet PileCofferdam without pit

CI-3b Containment Island in US Zone 3 is modified (see below)Zone 3, US, ConcreteCaisson Embankment

C1-1 Containment Island in NY/NJ Team needs technical information for Consider USACE study but noteUpdated Zone 2 in Lower this altemative still under development significant environmental concernsBay by the USACE; Team members will

comment individually when progressreport is completed

CI-2 Containment Island in US Team needs technical and legal Consider study; note environmentalUpdated Zone 3 in Bight information for this alternative still under concernsApex development by the USACE; Team

members will comment individuallywhen progress report is completed

CA-1 New Containment Area NY Not under consideration by DMMT duein Atlantic Basin to location solely in NY watersSUBAQUEOUS pITALTERNATIVES:

SP-1 New subaqueouspit, NJ Team needstechnicalinformationfor Considerstudy;noteenvironmentalmodifiedZone 1, Lower thisalternativestillunderdevelopment concernsBay bythe USACE; Team memberswill

comment individuallywhen progressreport is completed

4

1D # Management Location Status Team ResponseAlternative

SP-2 New subaqueouspit, NY/NJ Team needsadditionalinformationto Consider study; noteenvironmentalmodifiedZone 2, Lower evaluatethisalternative;Team concernsBay memberswill commentindividually

whenprogressreport is completedSP-3 New SubaqueousPitat NY Not underconsiderationby DMMT due

BoweryBay, NY to locationinN¥ watersSP-4 New SubaqueousPitat NY Not underconsiderationby DMMT due

Bay Ridge Flats, NY to locationinNY watersSP-5 New SubaqueousPitat NJ Underconsiderationinthe DMMP Supportfurther study;notepotential

ConstableHook,NJ habitatconcerns

SP-6 NewarkBay Subaqueous NJ Underconsiderationinthe DMMP Supportedin previousteam reportPit,North A, NJ

SP-7 NewarkBay Subaqueous NJ Underconsiderationinthe DMMP Supportedin previousteam reportPitlSouth,NJ

SP-8 ExistingLarge EastBank NY Not underconsiderationby DMMT dueSubaqueousPit, N¥ to locationinNY waters

SP-9 ExistingSmallEast Bank NY Not underconsiderationby DMMT dueSubaqueousPit, NY to locationinNY waters

SP-10 ExistingWest Bank NY Not underconsiderationby DMMT dueSubaqueousPit, NY to locationinNY waters

SP-11 ExistingCAC NY Not underconsiderationby DMMT dueSubaqueousPit, NY to locationinNY watersUPLAND DISPOSALALTERNATIVES:

UD-1 UplandDisposalSite Leonia,NJ Not underconsiderationby DMMT due159, BergenCounty,NJ to Governor'sdirective

UD-2 UplandDisposalat Site Moonachie, Not underconsiderationby DMMT due161, BergenCounty,NJ NJ to Governor'sdirective

UD-3 UplandDisposalat Site NJ Under considerationbyUSACE DMMP Supportfurtherstudy,provided172, HudsonCounty,NJ HMDC approval is secured

UD-4 UplandDisposalat Site NJ Not underconsiderationby DMMT due184, MiddlesexCounty to Governor'sdirective

UD-5 UplandDisposalat Site Raritan Underconsiderationinthe USACE Supportfurther study,provided187, Middlesex County Arsenal, NJ progressreport landowner and localapprovalsare

secured.

UD-6 UplandDisposalat Site Edgeboro Underconsiderationinthe USACE Supportfurther studyprovided190, MiddlesexCounty Landfill,NJ progressreport landownerand local approvalsare

secured

UD-7/UP-1 UplandDisposalat Site Belford,NJ Underconsideratiohinthe USACE Site has potentialasa regional193, MonmouthCounty progressreport disposalfacilityfor nearbyprojects

UD-8 UplandDisposalat Site Shrewsbury, Not underconsiderationby DMMT due214, MonmouthCounty NJ to Govemor'sdirective

UD-9 UplandDisposalat Site N¥ Not underconsiderationdue to location235, RichmondCounty in NY

UD-IO UplandDisposalatCold NY Notunderconsiderationdue to locationSpringQuarry in NY

UD-11 UplandDisposalat NY Notunderconsiderationdue to locationCedar CliffQuarry in NY

UD-12 UplandDisposalat NY Notunderconsiderationdue to locationClintonPointQuarry in NY

UD-13 Upland Disposalat NY Notunderconsiderationdue to locationBrighamBrickyard inNY

UD-14 Upland Disposalat NY Notunderconsiderationdueto locationCementonQuarry inNY

UD-15 UplandDisposalat NY Not underconsiderationdueto locationRavena Quarry in NY

UD-16 UplandDisposalat Orion NJ Implementedin NJ Team supportsand has supportedElizabeth inpreviousreportDECONTAMINATIONTECHNOLOGY:

DT-1 Decontamination TBD UnderConsiderationinthe DMMP Team supportsfurtherdevelopmentTechnology-Production

ID # Management Location Status Team ResponseAlternative

LevelTestingDT-2 Decontamination TBD UnderConsiderationinthe DMMP Team supportsfurtherdevelopment

Technology-PartialImplementation

DT-3 Decontamination TBD UnderConsiderationinthe DMMP Team supportsfurtherdevelopmentTechnology-PartialImplementation

DT-4 Decontamination TBD UnderConsiderationinthe DMMP Team supportsfurther developmentTechnology-FullScaleImplementationSEDIMENTREDUCTIONALTERNATIVES:

SR-1 SedimentReductionat NY Notunderconsiderationby DMMT duePort ChesterHarbor to locationin NY

SR-2 SedimentReductionat NY Notunderconsiderationby DMMT dueFlushingBay to locationin NY

SR-3 SedimentReductionat NJ Underconsiderationin DMMP progress SupportfurtherstudyRaritan River report

SR-4 Sediment Reduction at NY/NJ Arthur Underconsiderationin DMMP progress Support further studyN. Shooters Island Kill reportReach,

SR-5 Sediment Reduction at NJ Under consideration in DMMP progress Support further studyPort Newark/Port reportElizabeth

SR-6 Sediment Reduction at NJ Under consideration in DMMP progress Support further studyBay Ridge/Red Hook " reportChannels

SR-7 Sediment Reduction at NJ Under consideration in DMMP progress Support further studyPort Newark/Port reportElizabeth

SR-8 Sediment Reduction at NJ Under consideration in DMMP progress Support further studyMOTBY/Port Jersey, reportBayonne

SR-9 Sediment Reduction at NJ Under consideration in DMMP progress Support further studyClaremont Terminal reportCONTRACTDISPOSAL:

CD-1 ContractDisposal/RFP TBD UnderconsiderationintheDMMP Supportconcept;but notepreviousprogressreport unsatisfactoryresultsin prior

USACE RFP (proposalsreceivedwere extremelycostly)

OPTIONSINCLUDED INDRAFT LISTS OFTHE DMMPPROGRESSREPORT:LAND REMEDIATIONALTERNATIVES:

LR-1 LandRemediation-OENJ BayonneSite, Underconsiderationof USACE inthe Supportonly Phase 1 at thistimeHudson DMMP progressreportCounty

LR-2 Land Remediation- NJ Under consideration of USACE in the SupportSeaboard/Koppers Koke DMMP progress reportSite

LR-3 Land Remediation-OENJ NJ Under consideration of USACE in the Supportmetromall DMMP progress report

LR-4 Land Remediation- Kearny, NJ Under consideration of USACE in the Support, provided approval fromKeegan Landfill DMMP progress report HMDC is secured

6

ID # Management Location Status Team ResponseAlternative

LR-5 Land Remediation-Penn. PA Under consideration of USACE in the Support demonstration projectCoal Mines DMMP progress report

SUB-CHANNELPLACEMENT:

SC-1 Sub-Channel Placement NJ Under consideration in DMMP progress Support further study andNewark Bay Federal report developmentChannels

SC-2 Sub-Channel Placement NY Not under consideration by DMMT dueat Bay Ridge/Red Hook to location in NYFederal channels and

anchorageSC-3 Sub-Channel Placement NY/NJ Under consideration in DMMP progress Support further study and

Hudson River Federal report developmentChannel

SC-4 Sub-Channel Placement NY/NJ Under consideration in DMMP progress Support further study andWard's Point Bend report developmentFederal Channel &AnchorageDECONTAMINATIONTECHNOLOGY;

DP-1 "Cement-Lock TBD Under consideration in DMMP progress SupportTechnology" IGT report

DP-2 Solvent TBD Under consideration in DMMP progress SupportExtraction/Stabilization- reportMetcalf & Eddy

DP-3 Portland Cement TBD Under consideration in the DMMP SupportSolidification-CEWES progress report

DP-4 Plasma-arc vitrification- TBD Under consideration in the DMMP SupportWestinghouse, Inc. progress report

DP-5 Manufactured Soil TBD Under consideration in the DMMP SupportProduction-CEWES progress report

DP-6 Soil Washing-- TBD Under Consideration in the DMMP SupportBioGenesis Enterprises progress reportDECONTAMINATION

DS-1 Decontamination Elizabethtown UnderConsiderationinthe DMMP Support,providedlocalapprovalstechnologyand Gas Site,NJ progressreport are securedStaging/testingsite

DS-2 Decontamination Construction UnderConsiderationin the DMMP Support,providedlocal approvalstechnologyand & Marine progressreport are securedStaging/testingsite Equipment-

DeeganSite,Elizabeth

DS-3 Decontamination HMDC Site, UnderConsiderationin the DMMP Support,providedHMDC approvaltechnology and Lyndhurst& progressreport is securedStaging/testingsite Kearny

KeeganLandfill,NJ

DS-4 FormerRaritan Arsenal Edison/Wood- UnderConsiderationin the DMMP Support 0nlywith landowner andbridge, NJ progressreport local approval

DS-5 Steel-StyleCo. Site Newburgh, Notunderconsiderationby DMMT dueNY to locationin New York

? Decontamination Bark Camp UnderConsiderationinthe DMMP Supporta pilot/demonstrationtechnologyand MiningSite, progressreport projectStaging/testingsite PA

?

IV. ALTERNATIVES:

A. REMEDIATION OF THE HISTORIC AREA REMEDIATION SITE:

(OD-3, OR-l)

Dredged materials have been disposed at the New York Bight Apex since the 1800's. The "Mud

Dump Site" was officially designated in 1984 by the USEPA with a maximum capacity of 100 millioncubic yards. Approximately 68 million cubic yards have been deposited at the MDS to date. The Mud

Dump site was closed September 1, 1997 to all but appropriate remediation material. Simultaneous withthe closure of the Mud Dump was the designation of the Mud Dump and surrounding areas as the HistoricArea Remediation Site (HARS).

Remediation of the Site will be accomplished by placement of remediation materials only to capexisting contaminated sediments that have been historically disposed of at that site. The Team concurs

with this approach and supports the USEPA HARS remediation plan discussed in the Supplement to theEnvironmental Impact Statement on the New York Dredged Material Disposal Site Designation of theHistoric Area Remediation Site (HARS) in the New York Bight Apex (May, 1997). The Team supportsremediation of the HARS.

B. AQUATIC CONTAINED DISPOSAL FACILITIES (ACDFS):

Containment Islands, Containment Areas, and Subaqueous pits comprise the aquatic containeddisposal section of the DMMP. Three Zones were considered as possible site areas for these ACDFS.Zone 1, in the Raritan Bay, was eliminated from consideration by the Governor due to its proximity to the

Jersey Shore area and potential adverse impacts on the continued restoration of this important recreationaland environmental resource. Consideration of ACDFS in the remaining zones is as follows:

I. CONTAINMENT ISLANDS

(CI-2a) Containment Island in Zone 2, NY/NJ--Sheet Pile Cofferdam without a pit in the LowerBay. The potential loss of habitat is of concern to some Team members and the area is known tobe a favored fishing area among recreational fishermen.

(CI-2b) Containment Island Zone 2, NY/NJ--Sheet Pile Cofferdam with pit in the Lower Bay.Same concerns as above.

(CI-2c) Containment Island in Zone 2--Stone/Armor Embankment with pit. Same concerns asabove.

(CI-3a) Containment Island at Zone 3, federal waters--Sheet pile Cofferdam without pit. Zone 3is an area on the inner continental shelf with-60 feet depths. Concerns include wave energy, butrelatively minor habitat loss. There may also be potential legal concerns.

(CI-3b) Containment Island at Zone 3, federal waters--Concrete caisson embankment. Sameconcerns as above.

(CI-1, CI-2) Containment Islands in modified zones--not enough information is available to the

Team for complete evaluation. Note environmental concerns and consider study.

2. SUBAQUEOUS PITS

(SP-2) New Subaqueous Pits at Zone 2, NY, NJ.--Concems involve the loss of bay bottom andhabitat, and movement of contaminated materials to a previously uncontaminated site.

(SP-5) New Subaqueous Pit off Constable Hook, NJ--Team supports additional study; potentialimpacts on areas with high habitat value is noted. The presence of potential surficialcontaminated sediments ( to unknown depths) may present difficulties in disposal and increase theestimated cost.

(SP-6) and (SP-7) Newark Bay Subaqueous Pits, North and South--Recommended in the earlier

team report (Feb., 1996). Siting of new pits will have to be undertaken, taking into considerationproximity to shoreline communities.

C. UPLAND DISPOSALLAND REMEDIATION

Upland disposal has the potential to contain large quantities of dredged materials over time andcan result in the acceptable use of contaminated materials. Screening criteria for siting upland disposal

facilities" has been approved by the Containment Work Group, established by the USEPA under theirDredged Materials Management Forum (the NJDEP and NJMR have additional screening criteria). TheWork Group document is entitled, "Criteria for Upland Dredged Material Confined Material DisposalFacilities (January, 1997). This work group has proposed that sites (at the very least) should be located:

• in an area of minimal potential environmental impact, avoiding wetlands, parklands, aquifer

recharge/water supply areas, floodplain, coastal erosion areas, threatened/endangered species habitats,and other areas of ecological, recreational, cultural/historical or agricultural significance;

• in an area of impermeable substrate;

• in a previously developed, non-residential area;

• of sufficient size to properly contain dredged materials for the expected life of the facility;

• selected to ensure ease of implementation including ownership, local zoning, and other socioeconomicfactors;

• near potential dredging areas or configured to provide suitable access to a navigable waterway.

The DMMT recommends that these criteria be considered in any upland siting proposals by the USACE.

In addition, the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection has finalized a technical manual,entitled, The Management and Regulation 9_fDredging Activities and Dredged Materials in NewTidal Waters, outlining criteria for upland dredged material disposal. The criteria in this document, too,should be considered in USACE upland siting proposals included in the DMMP.

1. Sites eliminated from consideration:

Upland Disposal at Bergen County sites: are in close proximity to residentialcommunities and the Governor has determined that these sites should not be under consideration

as a site for dredged sediment disposal. The USACE has removed them from consideration underthe DMMP.

Monmouth County_ Site 214: was eliminated under the Governor's directive due toproximity to residential areas and other regional considerations (Shrewsbury).

9

2. Sites remaining under consideration:

Upland Disposal at Site. 172. Hudson County. . N J: Remediation of former Keegan Landfill,Kearny: Potential disposal and landfill remediation favored by Team. Use of this site must be

approved by the HMDC, NJDEP, and other appropriate agencies.

Upland Disposal at Orion, Elizabeth, NJ: Remediation of a former landfill with redevelopment.Acceptable, already in use.

Koppers Coke Seaboard Site: Project, ongoing, is supported by DMMT. The project should

include upland development for commercial/industrial use.

Bayonne_ phase 1: Team members support Phase 1 remediation of a contaminated site andlandfill with redevelopment, provided state and local approvals are obtained.

Upland Disposal at Site 190. Middlesex County. NJ: active Edgeboro landfill--Potentialdisposal, extraction mining, and landfill remediation, issues requiring further study due toenvironmental concerns. Support study for site remediation, provided landowner and local andstate agency approvals are secured.

Land Remediation at Raritan Arsenal, Edison, N J: Support further study provided landownerand local approvals are secured.

D. DECONTAMINATION TECHNOLOGY

Decontamination Technology has previously been identified by the DMMT as a medium-to long-term solution to manage some contaminated dredged materials from the Port of NY/NJ. The Team

recommends continued pursuit of production level to full scale implementation of decontaminationtechnologies in the Port, taking into account cost considerations. As proposed in the DMMP, the followingdecontamination technologies: IGT ("Cement Lock Process"); Metcalf & Eddy (CementSolidification/Stabilization); Westinghouse Science & Technology Center (Plasma Vitrification); WES(Manufactured Soil Production/Phytoremediation); BioGenesis Enterprises, Inc. (Soil Washing) should be

pursued at the following decontamination levels:

DT-1: Decontamination Technology Production-Level Testing,DT-2: Decontamination Technology Partial Implementation,DT-3: Decontamination Technology Partial Implementation, andDT-4: Decontamination Technology Full-Scale Implementation.

E. DECONTAMINATION SITES

The following sites have received preliminary screening as potential sites for testing and

implementation of decontamination technologies:

DS-I: Elizabethtown Gas Co. Site--Potential support by DMMT provided that there islocal approval.DS-2: Deegan Site, Elizabeth--potential support for the use of this site for a transfer

operation provided that there is local approval.DS-4: HMDC Site, Lyndhurst & Kearny, NJ--Supported by DMMT, provided that there

is local approval.DS-5: Keegan Landfill, Kearny, NJ-Supported by DMMT provided that there is localapproval.

The Team supports further feasibility studies for pilot and full-scale projects at these sites.

10

F. SEDIMENT REDUCTION/MINIMIZATION

The Sediment Source Reduction/Minimization Methods are techniques that can be used to reduce

the quantity of sediments that need to be dredged. These include structural modifications, channel designoptimization, advanced maintenance dredging, and port facilities planning. The Team has previouslyendorsed and continues to endorse these options. These methods should also be pursued in conjunctionwith the Harbor Navigation Study, and should be considered in all projects. Advanced Maintenance

methods are techniques that can be used to reduce dredging frequency, control the locus of channelshoaling, separate shoaling into discrete areas thereby reducing costs. A variation of advance maintenanceincludes overdredging to create disposal capacity.

SR-3 --- Sediment Reduction at Raritan River, NJ --Team recommends further consideration and

reevaluation of channel design.

SR-4 -- Sediment Reduction at North Shooters Island Reach, AK, NJ--Team supports furtherconsideration and evaluation of Advanced Maintenance (AM) techniques.

SR-5 -- Sediment Reduction at Port Newark/Port Elizabeth, NJ--Team Supports furtherconsideration and evaluation of Advanced Maintenance (AM) techniques at this site.

SR-7 -- Sediment Reduction at Port Newark/Port Elizabeth--Newark Bay and related federalchannel areas (basin entrance narrowing and pneumatic barriers)--Team supports further

consideration and evaluation of this technology. The proposal also needs the concurrence of theHarbor Operations Committee.

SR-8 -- Sediment Reduction at MOTBY/Port Jersey, Bayonne, NJ (MOTBY)--basin entrancenarrowing and pneumatic barriers--MOTBY and the Port Jersey Channel--Team supports furtherconsideration and evaluation of this option.

SR-9 -- Sediment Reduction at Claremont Terminal--Claremont Ocean Terminal Channel--basin

entrance narrowing, pneumatic barriers and channel redesign--Team supports these options.

H. SUB-CHANNEL PLACEMENT

Sub-channel placement can be considered a type of subaqueous disposal pit within a channel area.The Team generally supports sub-channel placement for sediment management purposes.

It', ADDITIONAL TEAM RECOMMENDATIONS:

The Team recommended the following additional actions:

FEDERAL:

1. The USACE should develop criteria for screening all disposal options by category.

2. The USACE should continue to educate the public on all aspects of the federal DMMP.

3. The USACE should emphasize beneficial use of dredged material.

11

STATE_

4. The Office of Maritime Resources and NJDEP should continue to pursue disposal options for long-term management of dredged materials.

5. The Office of Maritime Resources "and the NJDEP should pursue decontamination technology

development through a "Request for Proposals" (RFP) process.

6. The Office of Maritime Resources and the NJDEP should continue to encourage beneficial use

projects for contaminated sediments.

7. The Office of Maritime Resources should develop a long-term management plan for dredged materialsfor the State of New Jersey, including contaminated sediments from the Port.

8. The Office of Maritime Resources and the NJDEP should pursue immediate trackdown and cleanup ofsources of contaminants to marine sediments.

9. NJDEP should continue to reduce contaminant loads from tributaries and runoff; and implement awatershed management approach.

10. All state and federal agencies should continue to consider additional nearshore or confmed disposalfacilities in the Newark Bay area as recommended by the DMMT's Final Report of 1996.

11. Additional proposals from the USACE for sites/options located in new Jersey upland areas or

jurisdictional waters should be submitted to the appropriate New Jersey agencies(DMMT/NJMR/NJDEP) for consideration prior to inclusion in supplemental DMMP reports/plans.

12. The Office of Maritime Resources and the NJDEP should continue to implement the NY/NJ Joint

Dredging Plan

13. Habitat restoration projects using dredged materials at canals that are no longer used for navigationpurposes (e.g. River Terminals and Long Slip Canal) should continue to be evaluated by state, federaland local agencies.

14. Public outreach and education efforts regarding DMMP proposals should continue to be pursued in aproactive manner.

BISTATE:

15. Efforts to implement the recommendations of the Bistate Dredging Plan for the Port of New York andNew Jersey should continue to be pursued.

VI. CONCLUSION

This report concludes the current assignment of the DMMT. State, federal and local agencies andTeam members will continue to work cooperatively to resolve economic and environmental issues with

respect to dredging and dredged material management. In the future, the Team will meet at the Governor'sdirection to address dredging-related issues in the State of New Jersey.

12

TEAM MEMBER: tAffiliation

Steven J. Corodemus, Chairman IAssemblyman, District 11

James E. Benton,Executive Director tNew Jersey PetroleumCouncil

LillianC. Borrone,PortCommerceDirector IPortAuthorityof New Yorkand New Jersey

James A. Capo, President INew York ShippingAssociation,Inc.

Albert Cernadas,ExecutiveVice-President IlnternationalLongshoremens'Association AFL/CIO

MauroChecchio,Chairman Ilnfrastructure/'l'ransportationCommittee

Angela Cristini,Ph.D. IRamapoCollegeof New Jersey

Sally Dudley,ExecutiveDirector tAssociationof NJ EnvironmentalCommissions

JudyJengo, PolicyAdvisor !Office of the Governor

M. BrianMaher, President IMaher Terminals

LewisJ. Nagy,AssistantCommissioner INewJersey Departmentof EnvironmentalProtection

Senator EdwardT, O'Connor,Jr. ISenator,District31

DennisJ. Suszkowski,Ph.D. IHudsonRiver Foundation

James T.B. Tripp,Esq. iEnvironmentalDefense Fund

RobertK.Tucker, Ph.D., Director IEcopolicyCenter, RutgersUniversity

CynthiaA. Zipf, ExecutiveDirector ICleanOcean Action

!

FEDERAL AGENCY REPRESENTATIVES: I

WilliamMuszynski,Deputy RegionalAdmin. iUSEPA

ColonelGary Thomas !USACE

I

STAFF: i

JenniferA. DiLorenzo,TechnologyProg.Mgr. IOffice of MaritimeResources

BeverlyA. Fedorko,SpecialAssistant !Office of theCommissioner

BarbaraMarshall,SupportAssistant !Office of theCommissioner

USA CE DMMP ALTERNATIVE SUMMARIES

13

]

DMMP Alternatives Summsry

Area

S;[e Nsme S[s:e [a=re) Vclu_,.£ " Sc'-::e Frcprjr,_f;[

Ocoa6 RorneciaU'm

M_'".-.¢ _ Rem_.=_==.n $,_e :.,'.S I._._¢6.0 L O_UP.J_ US=F,A,

0ocon_minacicn Tec.'.no{o_,o: I Ttaatment MeU_o¢:

PrOCel=l_ lO e= Te=tld (_ro¢uc'Jan l=-=ll

"CcmcnI-LOCJ_ T_:n_c<;'f" • mJ;L C! G_ T_. HA T;-D T6O 5_-=. 405 EpAIEcNA._

ot_em c.._ra=._n & S¢ICiEQUOrVS,,Cd_=_on o Met--,-_ & EddT. Inc. HA T;_O TBO 5c_. 40 (. E_AJCE,_,j_

P'_-er=. _.K*-'_on • W¢l_ghou_= NA TBO Teo 5¢___405 EP_CEN_._

Manulac'._teC SC_I W'ocu=;=_ HA T_I_ _"_O Sc_._ _OS E=AjCE_{_N

MO:_t Proml=lng PO¢IrlUI[ =:]{=_ for ._L;;In_ Pr-_c_lll_

c-'c._:cmL_,mG_=Co $_e.E_,'-:o¢_._; ,_j T_n T@0 J 5¢':'..40', EP_,'_ENJ_

O¢=g=n5_= .Er¢_:_m.N_ NJ TEO TB0 J S_'_. =0_ ' EPAIC-N._

St=el-.._,¥1o CO.._n¢. HC'_OuP';n. NY _l'f T'50 T_ J 5c'ci. 40.5 EP_.JCENAt_

MM_C S,_e. LTndnu_l & Ke4tm?. NJ r_J TED Tsr_ J 5c_. 40S " F.PA_t'ENA_

K_=n L._C/';L Kc=rnt. NJ __ tlJ TED TaD J .Se_ ,:S EP_,'CE.%k._

a=r¢ Camp _n,_; "_,_e.PcPJ',o¢. PA PA "_80 "_P_D I S_--. 405 E.pNC.CNA.H

_on_ficta[ Uses

•.*_=:: San_ _-,L NY :_T :::.P. J 5 J r_MM_/_ :--'H_,N

bn_ RI/'_IGI,_UO_ J

C_->i: .__-t-cr._ ¢_. _:,=.: ",:_:.:y hj l.&.,(" I u CIJMP-IR prv,_la

CEMJ I _¢_'oP,.=-" Ena NJ 53. t_ J 5 CMM;.I_ ";_.._,1_

K.--e';_nL3ncY _'. K_a_neT. M;c_a Ccvr,.'_.NJ HJ ::z= l s CM_P.IR p_,,=

(Ccr,'._inmen: Fac'liL:e: {W{_lan¢ I

r u ._.-:.%.1n n • t Pi,_ CIf'_ Inl

...... :- i ,=- TF.C CF_.X_.'_

_.a z R'd.;-.JR_J h'_,_t F_-==r--' C,%ar._-t & _.-,_:'.=-'_';= NY : T'_: { { ..:-e_ "-.V,'..tF - l l:. C_-'p._.N

CCn_ned AqU::l'.J: _l'_CCCal - (_U'_lCUe'c_u_ Pl") J Il

"s._: -z_,s=_, _:_ _Y ._" _, ._,_ ::: I s C_,_,P-',_ =_._ J

l,_c,_-cZ:,-,_:-L.-.-.,a,_ I _._= ,-?-3 ! I L cuu_4R :=.v_ I

G_._-=_ ;',,_ _.Y ! _':" :'* : J S mMMP.IR CZ.N,,_N I

'_,=r,_ar, i [

, ._.;.,_:c ":_,'_ :';Y j NY t :5.C IS" J Dk4M:4R I P.._NY,,'_ J

j_".h¢: Nc._not_ S.'_=._iunccr 0_c-_=:mcnl) J 1"50 i T-=C t T'_O J P_.NY/NJ I F%NYINJ I

I,',.4c.cK,,,.,._Zcno : . C..._:._ I b'5 J .'.=¢.O L j =MMPqR ! :_.NA,N I

w

I

- DMMP Alternatives Summary

Area Year Lead/Option Site Name SLate Volume "(acrel Available Proponent

Ocean Remediat.ion

Histo, n¢ At_a Reme_lauQn Site tJS 1?,..1QB.0 L 1._97 USEPA

Decontamination Technologies / Treat_nent MethodsProcessesto beTested (productionlevel1

"Cemem-Loc.k Te_nelo_y' - Inst. of G,_ Tec_. NA TBO S EPNCENAN

Solvent ,_c_on & Solidific_t,ion,/_Labilizauon. MetJ=_f & E"cf. Inc. N,A TBO S EPNCENAN

Por'Jand Cement SolidiSc,.3tJon/Stabiliza_on oMetr._f & Edey. Inc. NA TBO S EPNCENAN

P!a_ma-at_ v_b'ifl,'-',uon. Wes_nghouse NA TED S EPNCENAN

Man_ar--ured So_[ pr_u,-on NA TBO S EPA/CENAN

Most Promisino Potential Sites for Sl._oino Processes

E!izabemtown Ga= Co S;le. E]_aOe_. NJ NJ TED TED EPNCENAN

Ce¢,;-nn Silo .E_iz'_'e_. NJ NJ TED TED EPNCENAN

Sleet-Style Co. Silo. Ne.wbu_h. NY NY TED TED EPNCENAN

HMOC S,te. Lyna_umt & Kearny. NJ " .Aeil_ NJ TBO TED EPA,'CENAN

Kee_an Land_ll. Kearny. NJ 0_1_ _il_ NJ TBO T2O EPNCENAN

8a,n_ Cam_ ,M,nmg Sde. PenSeld. PA " I PA TED T=..D EPA/C--NAP,I

Eeneficial Uses

HahiL3t Restoration

;3.';'- _.3:: ]:nr, F." :iY :_'t" '_,:.-" !._ C_.NAN

_ma_l E..l.lt Ea.'X._,PIL ,'_Y NY 8"!.3 S C_-,P'_.%hl

','/ef.l .=ar:K ,C:L NY NY "CO.0 S C_N,&_'I

CAC P,L NY NY 1E-_.0 S CEN.,_N

P ;!l_a,"nBay I._,_II.NY NY T_=O S PnvaTtJC_.NAN

_',I_.=_l_md. J_(::_ Bay. NY NY TSD TF.O CE.N_

Fcr_cr Runv,_ry. Fio-fQ 2¢r.nel:l F_e!d. J..1J'r,,_c._£z/. ;;Y NY TED T'-O CENAN

,:'ama_ca .;:zy E._S=ng P_L_(;cover'S1 NY TT"0 .._" C2._IA'I

Land Remediation

CF..NJ /Baycnne Sile. Hud_,cn County NJ I E6:3 M Pnv_e

SeaCca,n:l I Kc_per= CcXe Silo NJ T_0 T=.0 Pnvate

CC.NJ I Me'J_.mall _te NJ Eg0 S Pnvate

Kee';,anL:_r.cf.ll,Kezmey. Hu_scn C:unty. NJ l"J 2C$ 0 S Pnvale

Pennsy_van:a C,:_ Mine Re<::amat_cn PA T_ L Pnva_e

." . :.::2::::.:: ,_n:_.c-.; ,,_ , :2".3J:.,3. '3"C3 C33c.' . : • "C22.'222z, _._.10 I :::

Area Lead/Option Site Name SLate Volume "" (acFe) Proponent

Containment Facilities

Ucland

Betfcn'L Monmcut.'1 C'L. ,"IJ (axa. U0-T) NJ 1EO.O S C_NAt4

Aau_tic

Sub-Channel P!acemen!

Hu,":on Rwer F¢cer_ Channel r_YP,IJ T2O TED CE.'qAN

Wa_'s Pmnl Bena F_::er'41 Channel & Anr..,",omge NWNJ T80 TB0 CEHAN

Ne-,van_Bay FeaeraJ Channel_ _'IJ TED TBD C'ENAN

Bay Ri";_Red Hock Fe_e_l Channel:s & An,_omqe : NY T_O TBD CENAN

Ccnfined Acuatic 0iscosal - (a.k.a. suba(::ueous cit'q

E:a:I_n._ : :

LaMe E_t BanV. P_L N'( t|Y : E._3.0 !,.', CF._,/',I

Small Ea._t Bank PiL NY _1,'_ NY 8_.0 S CE,NAJ',I 'i

V',/es!Banw.PiL NY __'_ NY '_r--_.0 S C-'-._Ukt'1

CAC P:L NY NY IE5.0 S CENAH

New

Mod,fiea Zone I.L."we_'Bay NJ T@D L CEt',br-,.N

Mc.d=fiedZone 2. L."_erBay NY,%IJ TF..O L C-',_[AJ_

E_s=em Ncwan_ Bay. ,=,U f.,IJ T=_.O T_-O C._I'b:,N

Ec",,enf8_. NY fly 74 0 S C-._L,:,t._

Bay A:c;e F/ale.;_Y NY :7. _ 0 _.4 C cy,T;.;,I

Nea_cre Ccr:ta:n,-..ec: Fac!it:e-_,

•_a_;c _a:_n. :;Y _;'f :-c.C S PA;;Y,.'.'.'NJ

C',ner hlear'_cre S,te= (uncer eeve'.c;,,-:en:] T--:_ T=.._, T_'O PA,'_Y,?,IJ

Mo_:Se_ Z:ne 2 - L.-',,*,et'Bay NY,,_JJ T_. L C _._;;.,.',1

Mo_=.'.e_ Zone "_• Co=an US T-_ L C _.."C.%N

C onb'-ac:Disposal

Ccn.'_ _s;.csa_,:_ T'-_ "..," TED C_NA.N

" ,'d]_,-i,at_. Wat.:r Cir:ulatior. _i_.,m._

Land Rcmcdiation

LR-I O'=Nj/'Eayoru'_cSite. Bas'arm_.,Huad_n NJ 156.0 bieaJu.'n _';_h [99g PrivateCount}.'

8_.0- Sm_!-S_e..2bcazdKo._p:::'sCok'_Site, K.e.:._t_ N] FJgh I99S ._._w=

LR-2 HuisnnCotmb' ,_ 2 A_,% 150.0 MediumOEN2fl'dr.vomall Sit:,Eli.za_,,.h.

LR-3 Cotm,'y ____ 69.0 Small High 1996 P:iv:t_

LR.-4 K._-..gan Land.£1I, _-nv, Hud_n 1_._ "_.0 Small High 1999 Private.County /

LR.5 Pennsyiv-ama Coal Mine ?,zclamation PA TBD Long- TBD 1999 Private:' Tmm

Containment FacilitiesUnland

a,,,r,_,a F.a.'_r (a.k.a. NS1). Behrcrd.b'P-I ...... NJ "["_D Small M:dktm 1999 h."Y'D

M¢:xmouth Counb'

r_.n_ Aquadr. D_I (a.k.,_..C_ubacu:ct_°pits) / i

In.side C,h.amn=ts*_'_SC-I Nc_'zrkBay F_e,-al _ N] 100.0 I..a.'ge Low 1999 ?A2',-:_j

SC-2 Eay ?de ge.'?,M,.Hook .FIM.-_. _s NY 260.0 L._°g= Low i999 N'h"D

SC-3 HudsonRiver Fedz.'-zdC'Mrm,e!_"_ _ h-Y.fN] 250.0 Lar_ Low !999 NYD

SC-' Wazd's Point Bend of NY/NJ F_er_)#" .NW 90.0 Me!rum Law 1999 N"t"DCMnn=!

Outside Ch.ann:ts

SP-I EMsting Low::::Bay Pits RW 1.401.0 Large Low 199g N%"D

SP-2 N:.w CAD Facil[des in Update.. Zone t NJ "_.D Long- !._w !999 NrYDof Lo_" Bay Te.,'m,

.<2-3 Ne'wC.-MDFaciliti_ in Update./Z_rm_ I.,cng-, - NY/NJ "_=D Low 1999 N'YD.o5 I..owcrBay ' Term

SP-4 N:-a,&rk n_v CDF NJ ._:..,O <...,'hall k'[_ium ',.997 .:A_N-_:_OS?-5 ._q.ddorM Ne',;_-k Ear C.-'_Y_.:!!i,-z_ ;':','J TSD ._2 '._D 1999 .",r'::"D

SP4 Constable b:ook FLats.Eayon.pa, Hudson N] TBD TED TED !999 .',,WD'Ceunb"

S?-7 Eo:v=3.' Bay, As'mfiz, Qa4=n.s Counu N-f ,._D q-_.D T_D 1999 NWD.

N.___________________r_hgreGentai:'u-nent Ya/lities

NS-t AH_._ndcBasin, RM, Hock,Kings 1,,_" '74.0 MMJ.um ble_um 1999 p._-N'YNJ

Ccunty.s,a_ndCon'_.inmem Faci!ii_ _O

OtherN_rshom Sites (und= . TED TBD TBD TBD PA:'_ ,_JNS-2 d...-,.e!opmcnt)

T_

_JfT"/_ Long- ' ' _,: N':."DC;-I U.,:_':,_ Zcn: 2 in Lewz: E:r.' "'":'":'?"]"2"_ T_.---nv.,, _.o_ ....

C:-'- U;_t_ Zzn: 3 in 3i_,',I Apcx US ._D_ Lax.- Low 2003 .\'_."D- T-..."m

Contract Disposal 'TED

C3-t Ccnu'n.: D i.%pc,sal TED ,_D TSD ('_.i_h_ !997 Pivz,,:

- " -'."olum_:Sm,',ll= <_'],000,0,'_0cubic",'ards(oF),.,'viediun_.= 3,000,000- !0,000,00,0c':',L_,£._= 10.000,000- _=0,000,000=:.,L:.z_-T_.._..= > _0.000,000cv

= . _-e+tu.,,= $20 - $401c',',[-T_,_h= "- Cos_..Low < S-.u/c,', ' '_ ,- . - S40/c'."

Table 3 - Alternatives Currently Available or Under Investigation

£D Alternative Type State Area Volume Cost Year LeadCode A.he:native Name/Site (acre) * ** Available Entity

Ocean Remediation .

OR-l H;..'toric Area Remediction Site US 13,306.0 Long- Low 1997 USEPA.Te.,"m

Decontamination Technologies/Treatment MethodsCandidate Processes for Production-Level

Demonstration

DP-I "Cement-Lock Tecknolo_" - Institute NIA -N/A TED Hi_ 1999 USEPAJofG_ Teeknolo=w' : ". NYI)

DP-2 Solvent Ex'a'-acfion -Memalf& Eddy, NIA : N/A TED Hi_ 1999 USEPAJ. Inc. i : NYD

DP-3 SolidificadorL'Stab_tion - CEWES N/A : N/A TED Medium 1999 USEPAJ

-High NYDDP-4 Plmsma-Atc Vitrifica_dn - N/A N/A ' TED High 1999 USEPA/

Westinghouse, Inc. " ,. NYDDP-5 Mmaufacrured Soil Production - N/A "N/A TED Medium 1999 USEPAJ

CE'*"ES -High N'YI)

D?-6 Sedhment '_¢'; o- " ' _ IQCO\___nm= BioGenesis NI.-, NIA TED H]o-h ... USEPAJ

E_-t:_rises, l.-.:. NYDPotential Sites for Stao_in,z Proce._ses

DS-I Ei_.be'.hto',:,'n Gas Co. Site, E!;r-be'2a, NI 3 I0 N/A N/A 1999 USE?AJ

Ua!ca Cow-.re' hL_,'D" - .4_--:e =-": ..... '-,_ .,J 9.0 N/.-'. NiA : tea U<=_.,jDS-2 Ccv_s_dc::c3 _" ' - " ............. \" L.......

Si::,Eib.zbe'.h,Union Co_,7 h'YD

DS-3 F__C L_dfiil Sites, . NJ" TBD N/A N/A 1999 USEPAJ

K:a.m.y/Lv=dhu.-z'._.Hu_e,_*rgen h'YDCo,'.',.des

DS-4 Former Ra.,'ita.nAnenal, N.I T'B=D N/A N/A 1999 USEPM

- Edison/Woodbridge,Middle._ex Count/ N-YD

" DS-5 Stee!-S_le Co. Site, Newbt_'_=_h,Orznge N'Y" 90.0 NIA N/A 1999 USEP._J

Co,unw N_'DDS-6 n ....... ._ 1999.z: =. Motmt.. Fac!iiry, Port,of .,N'Y:.,NJ .,N'Y_NJ <3...0 N/A N/A USEPAJ

NYD

Eeneficial Uses! Habitat Restoration

t FL/4.-I Fill Existln__ De_,,','adedPits N'Y/'NJ TBD TED TED 1QQ8 N'_"D

' F_-2 Create:'Enhznce Wefl_uds N'YI..'N.I TED TBD TBD 1999 NYDt, FIR.-3 Creat:"Eah_ce Shellfish Be_ N"Y/_"NJ TBD TED TED 1998 NYD

FE'_..4' CreatdEnhance Fish Reeg NY/INI TBD TED TED 1999 hW'D

I :--_-5 Create.'E_=ce Bird Habitat N'T/D'J TBD TED TED _Qoo .N'YD

{ FLX-6 Consa-uct Wetlands for Water QuMity NY/NJ TBD TED TED 1999 N'Y'DImprovement

.-_-.-, Fiil qe_.... ,4.-keensto kmFrove \\ .... N'Y,N3 TBD TBD "i'BD 1999 N'Y'D

Quatiw/FlushL'_g

E.._-8 Fill Bath'.'me-_calIy Dis:'m'bed .-k.rem:o N'Y..,NJ TSD TSD TED 1999 N_-"DV,.... C_ _u,-.mn Pro_ie_-'.s.klleviate ""*- ;--" :_'"

" - Volume: Smil = <3,000,000 cubic ','=is (cv), ,.x,le,.du.m= 3,000,000 - 10,000,000

cv,

L_ge = 10,000,000 - 50,000,000 c.v,Long-Te.nn = > 50,000,000 cv• " - Cost: Low = < S20;'cv,._[edium = 520 - .<a0/cv.. ., Eich = "- S40.,'c.v

. ID Alternative Type Area Volume (_ost y e_r Lead I, Code ._Jt__mardveNa.m_,"Si_e State (acre) * ** Available Enfit) !Land Remedi:_tion

LR-i OE';7_Sa','or_=-l::, _a','ar_=,Huron \:" ' _-"_ ',¢°_:"- -':_- T99S _-:....Co_Ir/

HudsonCazznry 150.0 M.-dimmLP.-3 ler:zy Ocrder_,W=HSHe,£"_=bezJ_ N] 69.0 Small High 1996 Priva:=

UnionCour,r/LR-4 K..... L_dfii!, K:2mv, Hudson N] _0QO Smail Hi__h 1999 P,'iva::

Com_LR.-5 P==nsylvaniaCoal Min: R:otamafion PA "t'BD Long- T:3D 1999 Privat-..

Te_

LR-6 H]viZDCL_ndzqllSiL-s NJ ' :TBD TBD TBD 2000 H]v£DC

Containment Facilities

Uol._nd

Lrp-I _...!fo:a..H_'bor (a.k._ N6I), B.'lfor_ NJ • TBD Small M:diu.m 1999 .NYDMom'noutbCou_nry

Aoun_i:

Co_Fn.'dAau2ficDisposal (a.k.,_

L-.sid:Ch_-_,_.':-!s

SC-l N:',v,_-kBayF:'_:ml Clz_---:[s NJ' _00.0 _ .... Low 1o:_ . .-'_'_._.TSC-2 3ay ?,J_g='P.-'_JZq_okF:d:.'-aiCh_---c:!s .x-f 250.0 L'-'2--= Low !99_ h"r,'DSC-3 H::_cn _',"-: :-;._1 Ch__-n:! .",,-Y/.NJ 250.0 r .... L-'.w 1cc_ N_"DSC-4' V,:_'d's?_-'::n'-d "" "%"" .M:di,-'n ) .,N_,-D..... _N. ,_] F:_:_I .N'Y. 90.0 Low ,999

O,:'aid'.C:._'-_=.'!s 1

S?-I :x;_-o Low'-r22y ?i_ h-Y 1,401.0 _ .... Low _993 N_"DSP-2 N:w C.ZD .2ci_!:i:s LnL::_2:.'_ Zcn: I NJ TED _.... Low 1_°a N_"D

of L_wer32y Te..-n _.SP-3 N'..wCA.DFa:!ii:i:s h Ucd2_.=_Zon: ") h"Y/NJ T--_D r .... Low 1°_9 h"r"D |

of Low:r Say T:.,-rn

!

S?4 N_'"'k _ CDF NJ - 1.0 S.'r.a!i Ni:_i_m 19_7 ?.ZN_,_]"SP-5 Addi.don_N:',v_--kEa?'C.'-'_DFaz_i!:i:s .NJ ,.'FED TED YE-D 1999 h'_¢_-6 Co:_a.bi:Hook -: " - " " N_'D.... a_, ::vorz.=, :_'-'_aa NJ _'=D TBD TED 1999

ComvSP-7 5owe.'-yBay, A.storia)Qu:e:'.s Co"-_r/ h_" TED TS=D "_D [99? hq_

N:_.hore Conmi_..v.mentFaciiid:s

NS-1 At!2aficBash_ R:dHook.,.g.LagsCog':r:' .,_" 74.0 biediu.'-a ..%iedim"a I999 FA.N_.'_'/NS-2 O_:: Ne_"shor'.Sit's (u.nd:r T'BD TBD TSD .TED TED p.zIx_l

!si_d CDF's

C!-! Upd2::dZon: 2 in Lower Bay _'Y_']' TED Long- Low 2002 N_Te..'z:n

CI-2 L"pda::dZon: 3 LnBi_t A::x US TED Long- Low 2005 N_"DT:.'-m

ContractDisposalCD-! Cc.".-_::Dis:cs_ "FBD ]-3D T'S=D W3=D !997 p:iv:::

C:igh)

" - \oiu__..=: SmM[ = <3,000,000 cubic v_ds (cy), _I_'_-n = -;,000,000 - 10,000.000 c?',

-_r_.-_e_= !0.0O0.000. - 50,000.000. cy, Long-Tc._'Tn = > ._0,000,.,_00 cv :"" Les::"Low-= < <'_n'-,, N£edi_m= _'_(_ S..eO.,L%,' "- ' _f"[icb. -- > 540.l'C\ • '