the negotiable instrument act 1881

Upload: abhinav-trivedi

Post on 03-Apr-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/28/2019 The Negotiable Instrument Act 1881

    1/5

    studymaterial.sapientindore.org

    http://studymaterial.sapientindore.org/2012/10/the-negotiable-instrument-act-1881.html?pfstyle=wp

    The Negotiable Instrument Act 1881

    Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 was passed by British India and f or o ver 130 years and except f or

    amendments, t he question of revising the act as a whole never been raised.

    History

    The history of the present Act is a long one. The Act was originally draf ted in 1866 by the 3rd India Law

    Commission and introduced in December, 1867 in the Council and it was ref erred to a Select Committee.

    Objections were raised by the mercantile community to the numerous deviat ions f rom the English Law

    which it contained. The Bill had to be redraf ted in 1877.

    Af ter the lapse of a suf f icient period f or crit icism by the Local Governments, the High Courts and thechambers o f commerce, the Bill was revised by a Select Committee. In spite of this Bill could not reach

    the f inal stage. In 1880 by the Order of the Secretary of State, the Bill had to be ref erred to a new Law

    Commission. On the recommendation of the new Law Commission the Bill was re-draf ted and again it

    was sent to a Select Committee which adopted mos t of the additions recommended by the new Law

    Commission. The draf t t hus prepared f or the f ourth time was introduced in the Council and was passed

    into law in 1881 being the Negot iable Inst ruments Act, 1881 (Act No.26 of 1881)

    The mos t important class of Credit Instruments that evolved in India were termed Hundi. Their use was

    mos t widespread in the twelf th century, and has continued till today. In a sense, they represent the o ldest

    surviving form of credit instrument. These were used in trade and credit transact ions; they were used as

    remittance instruments f or t he purpose of transfer of f unds f rom one place to another. In Modern

    era Hundi served as Travellers Cheques.

    Types of Negotiable Instruments

    According to Section of the Negotiable Inst ruments Act means "A negotiable instrumentmeans a

    promissory note, bill of exchange or cheque payable either to order or to bearer.'[3] But in Section 1, it is

    also described that Local extent , Saving of usage relating to hundis, etc., Commencement . - It

    extends to the whole of India but no thing herein contained af f ects t he Indian Paper Currency Act, 1871,

    Section 2, or af f ects any local usage relating to any inst rument in an oriental language. Provided that

    such usages may be excluded by any words in the body o f the inst rument, which indicate and intention

    that the legal relations o f the parties thereto shall be governed by this Act; and it shall come into f orce

    on the first day of March, 1882.[3]

    Modern era and Negot iable Instruments

    With t he growth o f the Economy, Negotiable Instruments have given the new dimensions to the

    commercial and corporate world. Now people pref er to carry a small piece of paper known as

    Cheque rather than carrying the currency worth the value of the Cheque. Befo re 1988 there being no

    provision to restrain the person issuing the Cheque without having suf f icient f unds in his account . Of

    course on Dishonoured cheque there is a civil liability accrued. However in reality it takes a long time torecover the money. In order to ensure promptitude and remedy against t he defaulters of the Negot iable

    Inst rument a criminal remedy of penalty was inserted in Negot iable Inst ruments Act, 1881 by amending it

    with Negotiable Instruments Act, 1988.[3]

    With the insertion of these provisions in the Act the situation certainly improved and the instances of

    http://studymaterial.sapientindore.org/2012/10/the-negotiable-instrument-act-1881.html?pfstyle=wphttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negotiable_Instruments_Act,_1881#cite_note-goiact-2http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negotiable_Instruments_Act,_1881#cite_note-goiact-2http://studymaterial.sapientindore.org/2012/10/the-negotiable-instrument-act-1881.html?pfstyle=wp
  • 7/28/2019 The Negotiable Instrument Act 1881

    2/5

    dishonour have relatively come down but on account of application o f dif f erent interpretative techniques

    by different High Courts on different provisions of the Act it further compounded and complicated the

    situation although on dishonour o f cheques the trends o f the verdicts o f theSupreme Court of

    India unequivocally demonstrate that there is subconscious judicial pressure in the mind of the Judges

    which leans heavily in f avour of the holder of the cheque.

    Having regard to the working of these penal provisions on dishonour of cheques and the bot tlenecks

    that have surf aced in strictly implementing these provisions, Parliament enacted the Negot iable

    Inst ruments (Amendment and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 2002 (55 of 2002), which is intended to plug

    the loopholes. This amendment Act inserts f ive new sections f rom 143 to 147 touching various limbs ofthe parent Act and Cheque truncation through digitally were also included and the amendment Act has

    been recently brought into f orce on Feb. 6, 2003.[3]

    Statutory Def initions

    Some of the important def initions of the Act, which are important are:

    Section 6 - Cheque[4]

    A cheque is bill of exchange drawn on a specif ied banker and no t expressed to be payable otherwisethan on demand and it includes the electronic image of a truncated cheque and a cheque in the electronic

    form.

    Explanation I

    For the purposes o f this section, the expressions-

    (a) a cheque in the electronicf orm means a cheque which contains the exact mirror image of a

    paper cheque, and is generated, written and signed in a secure system ensuring the minimum saf ety

    standards with t he use of digital signature (with o r without biometrics signature) and asymmetric crypto

    system;

    (b) a truncated cheque means a cheque which is truncated during the course of a clearing cycle,

    either by the clearing house or by the bank whether paying or receiving payment, immediately on

    generation of an electronic image for t ransmission, subst ituting the further physical movement of the

    cheque in writing.

    Explanation II

    For t he purposes o f this section, the expression clearing house means the clearing house managed by

    the Reserve Bank of India or a clearing house recognised as such by the Reserve Bank of India.

    Section 13 - Negotiable Instruments

    (1) Negotiable instrument. A Negot iable Inst rument means a promissory note, bill of exchange or

    cheque payable either to order o r to bearer.

    Explanation (i)-A promiss ory note, bill of exchange or cheque is payable to order which is expressed to be so payable o r

    which is expressed to be payable to a particular person, and does not contain words prohibiting transf er

    or indicating an intention that it shall not be transf erable.

    Explanation (ii)-

    A promiss ory note, bill of exchange or cheque is payable to bearer which is expressed to be so payable

    or on which the only or last endorsement is an endorsement in blank.

    Explanation (iii)-

    Where a promissory note, bill of exchange or cheque, either o riginally or by endorsement, is expressed

    to be payable to the order of a specif ied person, and not to him or his order, it is nevertheless payable

    to him or his o rder at his option.

    (2) A negot iable instrument may be made payable to two or more payees jointly, or it may be made

    payable in the alternative to one of two, or one or -some of several payees.

    Section 123 - Che ue Crossed Generall

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negotiable_Instruments_Act,_1881#cite_note-3
  • 7/28/2019 The Negotiable Instrument Act 1881

    3/5

    Where a cheque bears across its f ace an addition of the words and company or any abbreviation

    thereof , between two parallel transverse lines, or of two parallel transverse lines simply, either with o r

    without t he words, not negotiable, that addition shall be deemed a cross ing, and the cheque shall be

    deemed to be crossed generally.

    Section 124 - Cheque crossed specially

    Where a cheque bears across its f ace an addition of the name of a banker, either with or without the

    words no t negot iable, that addition shall be deemed a crossing, and the cheque shall be deemed to be

    crossed specially, and to be crossed to that banker.

    Section 126 Cheque crossed specially

    Where a cheque is crossed generally, the banker, on whom it is drawn shall not pay it otherwise than to a

    banker.

    Payment o f cheque crossed specially- Where a cheque is crossed specially, the banker on whom it is

    drawn shall not pay it o therwise than to t he banker to whom it is crossed, or his agent, f or collection.

    Section 130 Cheque bearing Not Negot iable

    A person taking a cheque crossed generally or specially, bearing in either case the words not negotiable,

    shall not have, and shall not be capable of giving, a better t itle to the cheque than that which the person

    from whom he took it had.

    Dishonour of certain Cheques for Insufficiency of Funds in Accounts

    Section 138 to 142 of Chapter XVII, of Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881, deals with dishonour of cheque.

    The main object is to introduce f inancial discipline in business dealings. Prior to insertion o f 138 of NI, adishonored cheque's lef t the person aggrieved with the only remedy of f iling a claim. The remedy

    available in civil court is a long drawn matter and an unscrupulous drawer normally takes various pleas to

    def eat t he genuine claim of the payee. In 1988, Chapter XVII inserted and added Section 138 to 142.

    Object o f the amendment is to held person criminally responsible for his acts in Commercial transactions

    Trade and Business dealings with people carried out carelessly or without sense of respons ibility.

    Section 138 - Dishonour of cheque for insufficiency, et c., of funds in the accounts

    Where any cheque drawn by a person on an account maintained by him with a banker f or payment o f any

    amount o f money to another person f rom out of that account f or the discharge, in whole or in part, ofany debt or o ther liability, is returned by the bank unpaid, either because of the amount o f money

    standing to the credit of that account is insuff icient to honour the cheque or that it exceeds the amount

    arranged to be paid f rom that account by an agreement made with that bank, such person shall be

    deemed to have committed an of f ence and shall, without prejudice to any other provision o f this Act, be

    punished with imprisonment f or a term which may be extended to two years, or with f ine which may

    extend to twice the amount of the cheque, or with both;

    Provided that nothing contained in this section shall apply unless-

    (a) the cheque has been presented to the bank within a period of t hree months from the date on

    which it is drawn or within the period of its validity, whichever is earlier;

    (b) the payee or the holder in due course of the cheque, as the case may be, makes a demand f or the

    payment of the said amount of money by giving a not ice in writing, to the drawer of the cheque within

    thirty days of the receipt o f information by him f rom the bank regarding the return of the cheque as

    unpaid; and

    (c) the drawer of such cheque f ails to make the payment of the said amount of money to the payee

    or as t he case may be, to the holder in due course o f the cheque within 30 days of the receipt o f the

  • 7/28/2019 The Negotiable Instrument Act 1881

    4/5

    said notice.(EDITED BY RP ON 14.08.2012)

    Explanation

    For t he purposes o f this section, debt or other liability means a legally enforceable debt or other liability.

    Another very important section is presumptions as to Negotiable Instruments under Sect ion 118 of the

    Act.

    Section 118 - Presumptions as to Negot iable Instruments

    Until the contrary is proved, the f ollowing presumptions shall be made:

    (a) of considerat ion. -

    that every negot iable inst rument was made or drawn fo r consideration, and that every such instrument,

    when it has been accepted, indorsed, negot iated or t ransf erred, was accepted, indorsed, negot iated or

    transferred f or consideration;

    (b) as to date .

    that every negot iable instrument bearing a date was made or drawn on such date;

    (c) as to time of acceptance.

    that every accepted bill of exchange was accepted within a reasonable time aft er its date and before its

    maturity;(d) as to time of transfe r.

    that every transf er of a negotiable instrument was made before its maturity;

    (e) as to order of indorsements.

    that the indorsements appearing upon a negot iable instrument were made in the o rder in which they

    appear thereon;

    (f) as to stamp.

    that a lost promissory note, bill of exchange or cheque was duly stamped;

    (g) that holder is a holder in due course.

    that the holder of a negotiable instrument is a holder in due course;

    Provided that, where the instrument has been obtained f rom its lawful owner, or f rom any person in

    lawful custody thereof , by means o f an of f ence or f raud, or has been obtained f rom the maker or

    acceptor thereof by means o f an of f ence or f raud, or f or unlawful consideration, the burden of proving

    that the ho lder is a holder in due course lies upon him.

    Five Ingredients of the of fence under Sect ion 138

    It is manif est that t o constitute an o f f ence under Section 138 of the Act, the f ollowing ingredients are

    required to be f ulfilled:

    a person must have drawn a cheque on an account maintained by him in a bank for

    payment of a certain amount of money to another person from out of that account

    The cheque should have been issued for the discharge, in whole or in part, of any debt

    or other liability;

    that cheque has been presented to the bank within a period of three months from the

    date on which it is drawn or within the period of its validity whichever is earlier;

    that cheque is returned by the bank unpaid, either because of the amount of money

    standing to the credit of the account is insufficient to honour the cheque or that it exceeds the

    amount arranged to be paid from that account by an agreement made with the bank;

    the payee or the holder in due course of the cheque makes a demand for the payment

    of the said amount of money by giving a notice in writing, to the drawer of the cheque, within

    30 days of the receipt of information by him from the bank regarding the return of the chequeas unpaid;

    the drawer of such cheque fails to make payment of the said amount of money to the

    payee or the holder in due course of the cheque within 30 days of the receipt of the said

    notice

  • 7/28/2019 The Negotiable Instrument Act 1881

    5/5

    the drawer of such cheque f ails to make payment of the said amount o f money to the payee or the

    holder in due course of the cheque within 30 days of the receipt o f the said not ice

    Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Faceboo k

    http://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogID=378830878443186242&postID=1750675469298842397&target=facebookhttp://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogID=378830878443186242&postID=1750675469298842397&target=twitterhttp://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogID=378830878443186242&postID=1750675469298842397&target=bloghttp://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogID=378830878443186242&postID=1750675469298842397&target=email