the nature of the judicial system the judicial system in the united states is an adversarial one in...

16
THE NATURE OF THE JUDICIAL THE NATURE OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM SYSTEM The judicial system in the United The judicial system in the United States is an States is an adversarial adversarial one in one in which the courts provide an arena which the courts provide an arena for two parties to bring their for two parties to bring their conflict before an impartial conflict before an impartial arbiter (a judge). arbiter (a judge). The system is based on the theory The system is based on the theory that justice will emerge out of that justice will emerge out of the struggle between two the struggle between two contending points of view. contending points of view.

Upload: derrick-day

Post on 02-Jan-2016

217 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: THE NATURE OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM The judicial system in the United States is an adversarial one in which the courts provide an arena for two parties to

THE NATURE OF THE JUDICIAL THE NATURE OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEMSYSTEM

The judicial system in the United States The judicial system in the United States is an is an adversarial adversarial one in which the one in which the courts provide an arena for two parties courts provide an arena for two parties to bring their conflict before an to bring their conflict before an impartial arbiter (a judge). impartial arbiter (a judge).

The system is based on the theory that The system is based on the theory that justice will emerge out of the struggle justice will emerge out of the struggle between two contending points of view.between two contending points of view.

Page 2: THE NATURE OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM The judicial system in the United States is an adversarial one in which the courts provide an arena for two parties to

THE NATURE OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM

There are two basic kinds of cases: criminal and civil. • In criminal law, an individual is charged with

violating a specific law; criminal law provides punishment for crimes against society (or public order).

• Civil law does not involve a charge of criminality; it concerns a dispute between two parties and defines relationships between them.

• The vast majority of cases (both civil and criminal) involve state law and are tried in state courts.

Page 3: THE NATURE OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM The judicial system in the United States is an adversarial one in which the courts provide an arena for two parties to

THE NATURE OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM

Every case is a dispute between a plaintiff and a defendant—the former bringing some charge against the latter.

The task of the judge or judges is to apply the law to the case

Litigants (the plaintiff and the defendant) must have standing to sue (in a civil case), which means they must have a serious interest in the case.

Page 4: THE NATURE OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM The judicial system in the United States is an adversarial one in which the courts provide an arena for two parties to

THE NATURE OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM

Class action suits permit a small number of people to sue on behalf of all other people similarly situated.

Because they recognize the courts’ ability to shape policy, interest groups often seek out litigants whose cases seem particularly strong.

At other times groups do not directly argue the case for litigants, but support them instead with amicus curiae ("friend of the court") briefs that attempt to influence the Court’s decision.

Page 5: THE NATURE OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM The judicial system in the United States is an adversarial one in which the courts provide an arena for two parties to

THE NATURE OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM

There are limitations on cases that federal courts will hear. • Federal judges are restricted by the

Constitution to deciding "cases or controversies."

• Two parties must bring a case to them (a case involving an actual dispute rather than a hypothetical question).

• Courts may decide only justiciable disputes, which means that conflicts must be capable of being settled by legal methods.

Page 6: THE NATURE OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM The judicial system in the United States is an adversarial one in which the courts provide an arena for two parties to

THE STRUCTURE OF THE FEDERAL JUDICIAL SYSTEM

The Constitution is vague about the federal court system.

Aside from specifying that there will be a Supreme Court, the Constitution left it to Congress' discretion to establish lower federal courts of general jurisdiction. • In the Judiciary Act of 1789, Congress created a system of

constitutional courts on the basis of this constitutional provision.

The basic judicial structure has been modified several times. At the present time, there are:• 12 federal courts of appeal • 94 federal district courts • thousands of state and local courts

Page 7: THE NATURE OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM The judicial system in the United States is an adversarial one in which the courts provide an arena for two parties to

Federal vs. State Courts - Key Federal vs. State Courts - Key DifferencesDifferences

Establishment of State and Federal Establishment of State and Federal CourtsCourts

State and local courts are established by a State and local courts are established by a state (within states there are also local state (within states there are also local courts that are established by cities, courts that are established by cities, counties, and other municipalities). counties, and other municipalities).

Federal courts are established under the Federal courts are established under the U.S. Constitution to decide disputes U.S. Constitution to decide disputes involving the Constitution and laws passed involving the Constitution and laws passed by Congress. by Congress.

Page 8: THE NATURE OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM The judicial system in the United States is an adversarial one in which the courts provide an arena for two parties to

Jurisdiction of State and Federal Jurisdiction of State and Federal CourtsCourts

The differences between federal and state The differences between federal and state courts are defined mainly by jurisdiction. courts are defined mainly by jurisdiction. • Jurisdiction refers to the kinds of cases a court Jurisdiction refers to the kinds of cases a court

is authorized to hear. is authorized to hear. State courts have broad jurisdiction, so the State courts have broad jurisdiction, so the

cases citizens are most likely to be cases citizens are most likely to be involved in -- such as robberies, traffic involved in -- such as robberies, traffic violations, broken contracts, and family violations, broken contracts, and family disputes -- are usually tried in state courts. disputes -- are usually tried in state courts.

Page 9: THE NATURE OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM The judicial system in the United States is an adversarial one in which the courts provide an arena for two parties to

Jurisdiction of State and Federal Jurisdiction of State and Federal CourtsCourts

Federal court jurisdiction is limited to the types Federal court jurisdiction is limited to the types of cases listed in the Constitution and of cases listed in the Constitution and specifically provided for by Congress. For the specifically provided for by Congress. For the most part, federal courts only hear: most part, federal courts only hear: • Cases in which the United States is a partyCases in which the United States is a party• Cases involving violations of the U.S. Constitution or Cases involving violations of the U.S. Constitution or

federal laws federal laws • Cases between citizens of different states (in civil Cases between citizens of different states (in civil

cases the amount in controversy must exceed cases the amount in controversy must exceed $50,000) $50,000)

• Bankruptcy, copyright, patent, and maritime law Bankruptcy, copyright, patent, and maritime law cases. cases.

Page 10: THE NATURE OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM The judicial system in the United States is an adversarial one in which the courts provide an arena for two parties to

Jurisdiction of State and Federal Jurisdiction of State and Federal CourtsCourts

In some cases, both federal and state In some cases, both federal and state courts have jurisdiction. This allows courts have jurisdiction. This allows parties to choose whether to go to parties to choose whether to go to state court or to federal court. state court or to federal court.

Page 11: THE NATURE OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM The judicial system in the United States is an adversarial one in which the courts provide an arena for two parties to

Federal vs. State Courts - Key Federal vs. State Courts - Key DifferencesDifferences

Most criminal cases involve violations of state law and Most criminal cases involve violations of state law and are tried in state court, but criminal cases involving are tried in state court, but criminal cases involving federal laws can be tried only in federal court. federal laws can be tried only in federal court.

For example, robbery is a crime, but what law says it is For example, robbery is a crime, but what law says it is a crime? By and large, state laws, not federal laws, a crime? By and large, state laws, not federal laws, make robbery a crime. make robbery a crime. • There are only a few federal laws about robbery, such as the There are only a few federal laws about robbery, such as the

law that makes it a federal crime to rob a bank whose deposits law that makes it a federal crime to rob a bank whose deposits are insured by a federal agency. are insured by a federal agency.

Examples of other federal crimes are bringing illegal Examples of other federal crimes are bringing illegal drugs into the country or across state lines, and use of drugs into the country or across state lines, and use of the U.S. mails to swindle consumers. the U.S. mails to swindle consumers.

Crimes committed on federal property (such as national Crimes committed on federal property (such as national parks or military reservations) are also prosecuted in parks or military reservations) are also prosecuted in federal court.federal court.

Page 12: THE NATURE OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM The judicial system in the United States is an adversarial one in which the courts provide an arena for two parties to

State Laws and the Federal State Laws and the Federal ConstitutionConstitution

Federal courts may hear cases concerning state laws if Federal courts may hear cases concerning state laws if the issue is whether the state law violates the federal the issue is whether the state law violates the federal Constitution. Constitution. • Suppose a state law forbids slaughtering animals Suppose a state law forbids slaughtering animals

outside of certain limited areas. outside of certain limited areas. A neighborhood association brings a case in state A neighborhood association brings a case in state

court against a defendant who sacrifices goats in court against a defendant who sacrifices goats in his backyard. his backyard.

When the court issues an order (called an When the court issues an order (called an injunction) forbidding the defendant from further injunction) forbidding the defendant from further sacrifices, the defendant challenges the state law sacrifices, the defendant challenges the state law in federal court as an unconstitutional in federal court as an unconstitutional infringement of his religious freedom.infringement of his religious freedom.

Page 13: THE NATURE OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM The judicial system in the United States is an adversarial one in which the courts provide an arena for two parties to

Where is a Murder Case Tried?Where is a Murder Case Tried?

It depends. It depends. For the United States, there are number of different For the United States, there are number of different

possibilities depending on who is involved and how the possibilities depending on who is involved and how the crime is committed. crime is committed.

Most often, murder would be tried in a state criminal Most often, murder would be tried in a state criminal court, but if the defendant is a juvenile, it may be tried court, but if the defendant is a juvenile, it may be tried in juvenile court; if the defendant is in the military, it in juvenile court; if the defendant is in the military, it may be tried in a military court. may be tried in a military court.

If the victim is any of a number of government officials, If the victim is any of a number of government officials, it becomes a federal case. In this instance, or if the it becomes a federal case. In this instance, or if the crime was committed as part of another federal crime, crime was committed as part of another federal crime, the case would appear before a federal court. the case would appear before a federal court.

Page 14: THE NATURE OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM The judicial system in the United States is an adversarial one in which the courts provide an arena for two parties to

Cases Filed Annually:Cases Filed Annually:

State Courts: 30,000,000 cases filedState Courts: 30,000,000 cases filedFederal Courts: 1,000,000 cases filed Federal Courts: 1,000,000 cases filed

Page 15: THE NATURE OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM The judicial system in the United States is an adversarial one in which the courts provide an arena for two parties to

Types of LawTypes of Law

Statutory LawStatutory Law Common LawCommon Law Equity LawEquity Law Constitutional LawConstitutional Law Admirality and Maritime LawAdmirality and Maritime Law Administrative LawAdministrative Law Criminal LawCriminal Law Civil LawCivil Law

• See handout for detailsSee handout for details

Page 16: THE NATURE OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM The judicial system in the United States is an adversarial one in which the courts provide an arena for two parties to