the mycenaean 'window-crater' in the british museum
TRANSCRIPT
8/9/2019 The Mycenaean 'Window-Crater' in the British Museum
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-mycenaean-window-crater-in-the-british-museum 1/4
The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The
Journal of Hellenic Studies.
http://www.jstor.org
The Mycenaean 'Window-Crater' in the British MuseumAuthor(s): V. KarageorghisSource: The Journal of Hellenic Studies, Vol. 77, Part 2 (1957), pp. 269-271Published by: The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic StudiesStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/629367Accessed: 17-03-2015 10:05 UTC
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available athttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of contentin a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship.For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
This content downloaded from 62.204.192.85 on Tue, 17 Mar 2015 10:05:26 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
8/9/2019 The Mycenaean 'Window-Crater' in the British Museum
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-mycenaean-window-crater-in-the-british-museum 2/4
THE
MYCENAEAN
'WINDOW-CRATER'
IN THE BRITISH
MUSEUM
THIS
fragmentary
vase
was discovered
in
1895
in a tomb at Curium
by
the British
Museum
Expedition (Turner
Bequest)
and was first
published
in the Excavations in
Cyprus.1
Since
then
references
to it
have
been
made
by
various
scholars,2
chiefly
because
of its unusual decoration
with
female figures inside ladder-pattern frames; these frames have been commonly interpreted as
'windows',
hence the
name 'window-crater'.
The same
tomb
in
which
the 'window-crater'
had
been
discovered was re-excavated
by
the
expedition
of the
University
Museum,
Philadelphia,
in
1939,
and
thirty-five
new
fragments
of
the
same vase
were
found.3
These
have now been restored
to the main
body
of the crater in the
British
Museum,
and it has
been
suggested
that
in
its
more
complete
form
it should be re-examined
and
published
with better
illustration.4
A
detailed
description
of its
form
and
fabric is
given
in BMC Vases and the
CVA.5
It
is
probably
the
largest
of
its kind
(height,
43'5
cm.;
diameter,
43"2
cm.);
the fabric
represents
Mycenaean
ware at its best:
buff
pinkish
clay,
dark red lustrous
paint.
Each
panel
between
the
two handles is
decorated with
a chariot
scene
flanked with
groups
of female
figures.
Side
A
(Fig.
I).
In the
centre
a
biga
with
driver and
passenger,
moving
to
right;
to
left,
[Photo:
British
Museum
FIG.
I.-'WINDOW CRATER',
SIDE
A
[Photo:
British
Museum
FIG.
2.-'WINDOW CRATER',
END
VIEW
ladder-pattern
frames
forming
a
square
divided
into four
rectangular
panels,
each
containing
a
female
figure;
to
right
similar
panels
with
solid
'shell'
motives
in
each
corner.
The
chariot-group, though very
fragmentary, betrays
in
its
drawing
the
neat
style
of
the
vase-painter. Like some of his contemporaries the artist is conscious that he is drawing two horses,
the
one behind the
other,
and
he
is
anxious to
convey
this
by
neat
drawing,
which
separates
from
one another
four hind
legs
and two
tails."
The
horses'
hoofs
are
accurately
drawn;
the
'tufted'
manes7
are
represented
in
the
form
of
feather-like
projections;
the
profiles
of
the
two
charioteers
are
also
neatly
and
accurately
drawn.
The 'ladies in
the windows' on the
left
(Fig.
2)
form
the
best
known
and
the
most
frequently
1
Murray
and
others:
Excavations
n
Cyprus,
p.
73,
Fig.
127;
see
also
BMC
Vases
,
Pt.
ii,
78,
fig. 132
=
C39I,
also
CVA.GBFasc.
i,
P1.
6,
No.
9,
p.
7.
2
Sir
A. Evans:
Mycenaean
Tree
and
Pillar
Cult,
JHS
xxi
(1901),
p. III;
BMC
Vases
xvi,
n.2;
Casson:
Ancient
Cyprus,
P1.
iv;
Furumark:
MP.
443
f.
3
University
Museum
Bulletin,
Vol.
8
(I940),
No.
I,
p.
9,
P1.
ivd.
4
Mr. A. H. S. Megaw, Director of Antiquities in
Cyprus,
and Dr.
P.
Dikaios,
Curator
of the
Cyprus
Museum,
kindly
allowed me to take
these
fragments
to
London
where,
with the
permission
of Mr.
B.
Ashmole,
then
Keeper
of the
Dept.
of
Greek and
Roman
Antiquities
in
the
British
Museum,
they
have been
restored to
the
crater.
Dr.
J.
Benson,
who
is
studying
the
Mycenaean
material
of the
University
Museum
Expedition,
has
given
me
permission
to
refer
to the
new
fragments.
To
the
above-mentioned scholars
I
express
here
my
thanks
for
their
co-operation
and
generosity.
5
Loc.
cit.
6
Cf. the British Museum crater
C373; the same idea
appears
later
in
Greek Geometric
vase-painting
of the
pic-
torial
style.
7
Cf.
Evans: PM.
iv,
p.
829,
figs. 8Io-II.
This content downloaded from 62.204.192.85 on Tue, 17 Mar 2015 10:05:26 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
8/9/2019 The Mycenaean 'Window-Crater' in the British Museum
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-mycenaean-window-crater-in-the-british-museum 3/4
8/9/2019 The Mycenaean 'Window-Crater' in the British Museum
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-mycenaean-window-crater-in-the-british-museum 4/4
THE
MYCENAEAN
'WINDOW-CRATER' IN THE BRITISH
MUSEUM
271
hands
in a
way
which
recalls
the
representation
of
gathering
of women
on Minoan
frescoes,
where
no
pillar-worshipping
is
suggested,
but
rather
vivid
conversation.16
It is
even doubtful whether
the
rectangular
panels
have
any
architectural
significance.17
As
it
has
already
been
observed,
there is
a
desire
for
symmetry
which
is
attained
by
dividing
or
separating
the
different
groups
or
scenes
by
means
of
frames
in
ladder-pattern.
They
may
simply
recall
a
similar
method
of
framing
panels
in
the
major
art of fresco
painting.18
If, however, they do have an architectural significance and the women are meant to be
looking
out
of
windows we must
admit
that the artist is more interested
in the
ceramic,
i.e.
decorative
requirements
of
his
subject
than in
the
subject
as
such. There is
probably
here
a remote echo
from
significant
representations
in
fresco
painting.
Furumark
suggested
a
pre-Homeric
rELtXo(rKO7TLa.19
One
may
also
suggest
that the
women are
watching
chariot
races,
or
bidding
farewell
to a
departing
hero
(in
the fashion of the 'Warrior
Vase')
or are
lamenting
a dead hero
departing
by
chariot.20
The
dress
of
the
'women
in
the windows' is
purely
Minoan: close-fit
jacket,
bell skirt
and
belt.
Outside
Crete this dress
prevailed
already
on
the
mainland-probably
in
royal
courts-at
the
time
of
the shaft
graves
at
Mycenae,
and
is
represented
on frescoes of the
LH.
III
period
in
centres
such
as
Mycenae,
Tiryns
and
Thebes,21
and on
ivories.22
In the Levant the
ivory
from
Ugarit
is
another
example,
under
strong
Minoan influence.23
The
'window-crater',
however,
is the
only
instance
where
Minoan dress
is
represented
in
vase-
painting.
Men and
women
on
Myc.
IIIA
vases
usually
wear
a
long
robe.24
The nearest
parallel
to the dress of the 'women in the windows' may be found on a miniature fresco from Cnossos where
women are
represented
in
the
theatral
area.25 The
women
near the
pillars
wear
a
blue shirt
with
black
horizontal
lines,
and a
plain
jacket.
The
striped jacket
of
one 'woman
in the window'
(Side
A
left,
lower
left
window)
is
paralleled by
similar
jackets
of
Mycenaean
female
figurines.26
Such
figurines
have
been found
on the
mainland,27 Rhodes,28
Cyprus29
and
Ugarit,30
and
date
from
the
Myc.
IIIA:
2
period
onwards.31
Chronology
of
the
'window-crater': The
shape
and
style
of
the
pictorial
scene
suggest
an
early
date. The
absence of
floral or
geometric fillings give
it a
pre-Amarna
date,
whereas the
close
similarity
of
the
drawings
with the
fresco
paintingsput
it
among
the earliest
Mycenaean
vases
of
the
pictorial
style.
It
should
probably
be dated
shortly
after
I400oo
.C.32
V.
KARAGEORGHIS.
Cyprus
Museum.
16
Furumark:
MP,
p.
445,
n.3.
17
Cf.
BMC
Vases,
p.
xvi,
n.2.
18
A
narrow
ladder-band is
also
observed on
the
Chieftain's
Vase
of
steatite from
Hagia
Triada,
where
the
shield-bearers
are
separated
from
the
other
two
figures.
19
op.
cit.,
p.
445,
n-4-
0
This
suggestion
I
owe to
Mr.
H.
Catling,
M.A.,
who
kindly
discussed with
me several
points
of this
note.
21
For
references,
see Lorimer:
op.
cit.,
p. 365;
she
rightly
believes
that
these
frescoes
were
made
on
the
mainland
in
the
fourteenth
century
by
Minoan
artists
after
the
sack
of
Cnossos.
22
A.J.
B.
Wace:
Mycenae, figs.
55-6
and
Ior
-3.
23
Syria
x
(1929),
P1.
lxi;
Ugarit
was
in
contact with
Crete
already
in the M.M.
period.
Cf.
Cl.
Schaeffer:
Ugaritica
ii,
p.
51,
53
et
passim.
24
Cf.
Furumark:
MP.
fig. 25,
Mot.
I:
i,
3-10
25
Evans:
PM
iii,
P1.
xvi,
fig.
28.
26
Lorimer,
op.
cit.,
fig.
53c.
27
Ibid.,
p. 366.
28
Furumark:
CMP,
p.
88.
29
P. Dikaios:
Guide to
the
Cyprus
Museum
(2nd
edn.),
p.
171:
9-Io;
Lorimer,
op.
cit.,
p. 366,
says
that no
such
figurines
have been found
in
Cyprus
so
Schaeffer:
Ugaritica
ii,
fig.
97
I18-19.
31
Furumark:
CMP,
p.
88.
32
Cf.
Daniel:
AJA
xlvi
(1942),
2
i,
places
it
between
I400-I370;
similar
date
is
given
by
Furumark:
Myc.
IIIA:
2e,
p.
443.
POSTSCRIPT
I had
overlooked
a
fragment
of
Mycenaean
amphoroid
crater
from
Enkomi,
discovered
by
Schaeffer
and
published
by
E.
Coche
de
la
Fert6,
Essai de
classification
e la
ciramiquemycinienne 'Enkomi,
pl.
i/7.
The
facial characteristics
of
the
charioteers
are
almost
identical with
those of
the
'window crater'
and the
Verghi
crater
referred to
above.
One
may
therefore
suggest
the
possibility
of
tracing
in
those three
vases
the
hand of the
same
vase-painter.
This content downloaded from 62.204.192.85 on Tue, 17 Mar 2015 10:05:26 UTCAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions