the meaning of language. so far we have considered language from a structural perspective, with...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: The meaning of language. So far we have considered language from a structural perspective, with relatively little concern for meaning. But (obviously)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cd85503460f949a18c5/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
SemanticsThe meaning of language
![Page 2: The meaning of language. So far we have considered language from a structural perspective, with relatively little concern for meaning. But (obviously)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cd85503460f949a18c5/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Semantics So far we have considered language from a
structural perspective, with relatively little concern for meaning.
But (obviously) words, phrases and sentences mean something.
![Page 3: The meaning of language. So far we have considered language from a structural perspective, with relatively little concern for meaning. But (obviously)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cd85503460f949a18c5/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Questions in Semantics Why does a certain set of words mean
something and a similar set mean something very different?
When do two different sentences mean the same thing?
How can one sentence mean more than one thing?
What is meaning?
![Page 4: The meaning of language. So far we have considered language from a structural perspective, with relatively little concern for meaning. But (obviously)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cd85503460f949a18c5/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Dictionary DefinitionsIs a word’s meaning simply its dictionary
definition?
![Page 5: The meaning of language. So far we have considered language from a structural perspective, with relatively little concern for meaning. But (obviously)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cd85503460f949a18c5/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Is a word’s meaning simply its dictionary definition? No! In our society, many people feel that the
dictionary definition of a word more accurately represents a word’s meaning than an individual speaker’s understanding of the word.
But descriptivists arrive at their definitions by studying the ways speakers of the language use different words.
![Page 6: The meaning of language. So far we have considered language from a structural perspective, with relatively little concern for meaning. But (obviously)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cd85503460f949a18c5/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
That is to say, A word’s meaning is determined by the
people who use that word, not by a dictionary.
Also, dictionary definitions are circular: For the same reason, the meaning of a word
in your mental lexicon can’t just be a string of other words: clearly there must be something more to the meanings of a language’s words.
![Page 7: The meaning of language. So far we have considered language from a structural perspective, with relatively little concern for meaning. But (obviously)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cd85503460f949a18c5/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
This will mean the end of my career. I mean to help if I can Wear your uniform properly! This means
you. His losing his job means that he will have to
look for a new one. Black Label means fine whisky. Those clouds mean rain. She doesn’t mean what she said. The Linguistics teacher is mean!
What do words mean?
![Page 8: The meaning of language. So far we have considered language from a structural perspective, with relatively little concern for meaning. But (obviously)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cd85503460f949a18c5/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Mental Images What else is there? One possibility is that a word’s meaning
includes a mental image: when you hear tree, for example, an image (or smell, or whatever) of a tree comes to mind.
Note that a mental image can’t be all there is to meaning, either, as each individual’s mental image of a given thing is likely to be different.
![Page 9: The meaning of language. So far we have considered language from a structural perspective, with relatively little concern for meaning. But (obviously)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cd85503460f949a18c5/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
For example: Write down the first example of each of
the following things that comes to mind.
bird vegetable fruit
![Page 10: The meaning of language. So far we have considered language from a structural perspective, with relatively little concern for meaning. But (obviously)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cd85503460f949a18c5/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
If that worked… Any analysis of a given word must take
into account this tendency (which is cultural) to choose a typical or ideal example of the kind of thing.
Any word, however, can be used to represent a wide range of things, any one of which may or may not be typical.◦ Even though your mental image of bird may
be, say, a chicken, the word is of course equally applicable to ostriches and penguins.
![Page 11: The meaning of language. So far we have considered language from a structural perspective, with relatively little concern for meaning. But (obviously)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cd85503460f949a18c5/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
An Example from a study of Semantics Where would you draw the line between an
arm chair and a sofa?
1 2 3
4 5
![Page 12: The meaning of language. So far we have considered language from a structural perspective, with relatively little concern for meaning. But (obviously)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cd85503460f949a18c5/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Meaning and Reference So, we need more for a word’s meaning
than simply a definition and a mental image.
Language is used to talk about things in the world, and many words seem to stand for (or refer to) actual objects or relations in the world.
Denotation
![Page 13: The meaning of language. So far we have considered language from a structural perspective, with relatively little concern for meaning. But (obviously)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cd85503460f949a18c5/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Meaning and Reference It seems reasonable, then, to consider the
actual thing a word refers to, its referent, as one aspect of the word’s meaning.
Note that words can also refer to things that don’t exist in the real world, like Santa Claus, Harry Potter, unicorns etc.
![Page 14: The meaning of language. So far we have considered language from a structural perspective, with relatively little concern for meaning. But (obviously)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cd85503460f949a18c5/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Reference◦ Words always refer to a specific object in the real
world. Joe who is a funny guy is my friend. The funny guy. My friend. That guy.
Lexical Semantics
Joe The funny guy
My friend
That guy
![Page 15: The meaning of language. So far we have considered language from a structural perspective, with relatively little concern for meaning. But (obviously)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cd85503460f949a18c5/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Problems with Reference Consider the fact that these two sentences
mean the same thing:Bill Clinton is married to Hillary Clinton.The winner of the 1992 U.S. presidential
election is married to Hillary Clinton. So Bill Clinton and the winner of the 1992
U.S. presidential election both refer to the same thing.
![Page 16: The meaning of language. So far we have considered language from a structural perspective, with relatively little concern for meaning. But (obviously)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cd85503460f949a18c5/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
But look at this sentence:Steve wanted to know if Bill Clinton was the
winner of the 1992 U.S. presidential election.
If meaning is based on reference, and Bill Clinton and the winner of the 1992 U.S. presidential election refer to the same thing, we should be able to replace the latter with the former.
But this substitution creates a sentence with a completely different meaning.
![Page 17: The meaning of language. So far we have considered language from a structural perspective, with relatively little concern for meaning. But (obviously)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cd85503460f949a18c5/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Sense (connotation) If reference were meaning alone there
would be some problems: Hobbits, unicorns, of, by, will, may Two expressions that refer to same object,
but different meaning Prime minister & Abhisit Sense but no referent
Lexical Semantics
![Page 18: The meaning of language. So far we have considered language from a structural perspective, with relatively little concern for meaning. But (obviously)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cd85503460f949a18c5/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Summary
1. Meaning is provided by a community of language speakers, not by some special authority like a dictionary or grammar book.
2. The meaning of a word or expression is not just a definition composed of more words in the same language, since ultimately the meaning of some words would have to be known in order to understand the definitions.
![Page 19: The meaning of language. So far we have considered language from a structural perspective, with relatively little concern for meaning. But (obviously)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cd85503460f949a18c5/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Summary3. The meaning of a word or expression is
not just a mental image, since mental images seem to vary from person to person more than meaning does.
4. The meaning of a word involves more than just the actual thing the word refers to, since not all expressions have real-world referents, and substituting expressions with identical referents can change meaning.
![Page 20: The meaning of language. So far we have considered language from a structural perspective, with relatively little concern for meaning. But (obviously)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cd85503460f949a18c5/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Time is money The walls have ears A little bird told me Back to the drawing board The early bird catches the worm
What do these phrases mean?
![Page 21: The meaning of language. So far we have considered language from a structural perspective, with relatively little concern for meaning. But (obviously)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cd85503460f949a18c5/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Synonyms Expressions that have the same meaning. Sign in the San Diego Zoo Wild Animal Park: Please do not annoy, torment, pester,
plaque, molest, worry, harass, bother, tease the animals.
Transmit Recuperate Descend
Lexical Relationships
![Page 22: The meaning of language. So far we have considered language from a structural perspective, with relatively little concern for meaning. But (obviously)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cd85503460f949a18c5/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Antonyms Opposites of a word Complementary: Alive/deadpresent/absent fail/pass Gradable pairs: Small/big hot/cold fast/slow happy/sad
Lexical Relationships
![Page 23: The meaning of language. So far we have considered language from a structural perspective, with relatively little concern for meaning. But (obviously)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cd85503460f949a18c5/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Creating antonyms by affixing: Likely/unlikely Able/ unable Smoker/nonsmoker Tolerant/intolerant Exceptions: Add ‘in’ to following words and explain the
meaning: Flammable valuable
Lexical Relationships
![Page 24: The meaning of language. So far we have considered language from a structural perspective, with relatively little concern for meaning. But (obviously)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cd85503460f949a18c5/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Homonyms (homophones) Different meaning but same pronunciation To, too, two Homonyms can create ambiguity: I’ll meet you by the bank.
Lexical Relationships
![Page 25: The meaning of language. So far we have considered language from a structural perspective, with relatively little concern for meaning. But (obviously)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cd85503460f949a18c5/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Hyponymy◦ scarlet, vermilion, carmine, and crimson are all
hyponyms of red (their hypernym), which is, in turn, a hyponym of color.
◦ What are these hyponyms andwhat is their hypernym?
Lexical Relationships
![Page 26: The meaning of language. So far we have considered language from a structural perspective, with relatively little concern for meaning. But (obviously)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cd85503460f949a18c5/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
What is the study of Semantics? How do we arrive at the meaning of a word? Explain the following concepts?
Antonyms, Synonyms, Homonyms, Hyponyms
Quick Review
![Page 27: The meaning of language. So far we have considered language from a structural perspective, with relatively little concern for meaning. But (obviously)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cd85503460f949a18c5/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Semantic PropertiesZeroing in on “meaning”
![Page 28: The meaning of language. So far we have considered language from a structural perspective, with relatively little concern for meaning. But (obviously)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cd85503460f949a18c5/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Consider this sentence:The assassin killed Kennedy.
What can you say about what happened? What kind of people were involved?
This kind of information, for example that assassin means a human, a murderer, and a killer of important people, are examples of the semantic features of a word.
![Page 29: The meaning of language. So far we have considered language from a structural perspective, with relatively little concern for meaning. But (obviously)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cd85503460f949a18c5/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Relating words by looking at commonalities. Big vs. Red Semantic property: “about size” Semantic property: “about color” Buy vs. sell Semantic property: “change in possession”
Semantic properties
![Page 30: The meaning of language. So far we have considered language from a structural perspective, with relatively little concern for meaning. But (obviously)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cd85503460f949a18c5/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Quick exercise: Determine a common semantic property
among the following words:
1) Hen aunt widow woman girlmaiden grandmother
2) Doctor dean professorteenager bachelor parent babychild
Semantic properties
![Page 31: The meaning of language. So far we have considered language from a structural perspective, with relatively little concern for meaning. But (obviously)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cd85503460f949a18c5/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Semantic properties One way of representing meaning is with
semantic features. This is a device we use to indicate the presence or absence of semantic properties.
For example, woman would appear as [+female, +human, -young, …] while girl would be [+young] and man would be [-female].
![Page 32: The meaning of language. So far we have considered language from a structural perspective, with relatively little concern for meaning. But (obviously)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cd85503460f949a18c5/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Concept Semantic features
Man [MALE], [ADULT], [HUMAN] Boy [MALE], [YOUNG], [HUMAN] Bachelor [MALE], [UNMARRIED],
[HUMAN] Woman [FEMALE], [ADULT],
[HUMAN] Girl [FEMALE], [YOUNG], [HUMAN]
Semantic properties
![Page 33: The meaning of language. So far we have considered language from a structural perspective, with relatively little concern for meaning. But (obviously)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cd85503460f949a18c5/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
These properties are overlapping:
MALE
ADULTPARENT
father
bachelor
mother
boy
woman
![Page 34: The meaning of language. So far we have considered language from a structural perspective, with relatively little concern for meaning. But (obviously)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cd85503460f949a18c5/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Semantic Properties and Meaning For the most part no two words have
exactly the same meaning; additional semantic properties make for increasingly finer distinctions.
For example, what semantic property distinguishes between “slap” and “hit”?
![Page 35: The meaning of language. So far we have considered language from a structural perspective, with relatively little concern for meaning. But (obviously)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cd85503460f949a18c5/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Semantic Features and Syntax Incorrect “matching” of the semantic
features of different elements of a sentence can result in ungrammatical (but syntactically sound) sentences:
The man [-female] was pregnant [+female].I sawed [+solid] the water [-solid].
The ideas [-living] are sleeping [+living].
![Page 37: The meaning of language. So far we have considered language from a structural perspective, with relatively little concern for meaning. But (obviously)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cd85503460f949a18c5/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
is concerned with the interpretation of meaning in context.
2 contexts: Linguistic context (discourse) Situational context (anything non-linguistic)
Pragmatics…
![Page 38: The meaning of language. So far we have considered language from a structural perspective, with relatively little concern for meaning. But (obviously)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cd85503460f949a18c5/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Within discourse, preceding sentence often affect the meaning of following sentences.
Reference/meaning of pronouns often depends on prior discourse.
Prior discourse often disambiguates words like bank.
Linguistic context
![Page 39: The meaning of language. So far we have considered language from a structural perspective, with relatively little concern for meaning. But (obviously)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cd85503460f949a18c5/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
…is the nonlinguistic environment in which discourse happens and includes speakers, hearers, any others present, their beliefs, physical environment, subject of conversation, time of day etc.
Situational context
![Page 40: The meaning of language. So far we have considered language from a structural perspective, with relatively little concern for meaning. But (obviously)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cd85503460f949a18c5/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Pronouns can be used to replace NPs from prior discourse.
Prior linguistic context plays important role when interpreting the pronoun.
It seems that the man loves the woman.Many people think he loves her.
What does her refer to? When a pronoun is coreferential, it is
bound. Could it refer to another person?
Pronouns and discourse
![Page 41: The meaning of language. So far we have considered language from a structural perspective, with relatively little concern for meaning. But (obviously)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cd85503460f949a18c5/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Many people think he loves her! Many people think he loves her.
When a pronoun refers to an object not explicitly mentioned in the discourse, it is free or unbound.
Pronouns and discourse
![Page 42: The meaning of language. So far we have considered language from a structural perspective, with relatively little concern for meaning. But (obviously)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cd85503460f949a18c5/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Quick exercise:State for each pronoun whether it is free, bound, or both.
1. Example: John finds himself in love with her. Himself= bound; her=free
2. John said that he loved her.3. Louise said to herself in the mirror: “she’s so
ugly.”4. The fact that he finds her pretty pleases Maria.5. It seems that she and he will never stop
arguing with them.
Pronouns
![Page 43: The meaning of language. So far we have considered language from a structural perspective, with relatively little concern for meaning. But (obviously)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cd85503460f949a18c5/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
The reference of some words entirely rely on situational context of the utterance.
First- and second-person pronouns (I, me, you, yours etc) are always deictic.
Third-person pronouns are deictic if they are free. If they are bound, their reference is known from linguistic context.
Deixis (dike-sis)
![Page 44: The meaning of language. So far we have considered language from a structural perspective, with relatively little concern for meaning. But (obviously)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cd85503460f949a18c5/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Following expressions are deictic:
Time deixis & place deixis
Now then tomorrow
this time that time seven days ago
2 years from now Last week Next April
here There This place
This city This farm Those buildings
Over there These mountains
This country
![Page 45: The meaning of language. So far we have considered language from a structural perspective, with relatively little concern for meaning. But (obviously)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cd85503460f949a18c5/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Example of real life deixis abuse
![Page 46: The meaning of language. So far we have considered language from a structural perspective, with relatively little concern for meaning. But (obviously)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cd85503460f949a18c5/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Quick exercise Determine any deictic expressions1. I saw her standing there.2. Yesterday, all my troubles seemed so far
away.3. Copper conducts electricity4. The toilet is to your right.5. He will graduate in the coming year.
Deixis
![Page 47: The meaning of language. So far we have considered language from a structural perspective, with relatively little concern for meaning. But (obviously)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cd85503460f949a18c5/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Presuppositions are implicit assumptions about the world or background belief relating to an utterance. They must be mutually known or assumed by the speaker and addressee for the utterance to be considered appropriate in context
Do you want to do it again?◦ Implies that she has done it before.
David wants more beer.◦ He drank some beer already.
The lecturer told the students to stop chatting.◦ The students were chatting.
More on situational context…
![Page 48: The meaning of language. So far we have considered language from a structural perspective, with relatively little concern for meaning. But (obviously)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cd85503460f949a18c5/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Quick exercise What are the presuppositions of following
utterances.1. Maria regretted not having accepted
Martin’s wedding proposal.2. Christopher swore to himself that he would
pass the exam this time.3. To quit smoking is so easy! I’ve done it a
hundred times.
Presuppositions
![Page 49: The meaning of language. So far we have considered language from a structural perspective, with relatively little concern for meaning. But (obviously)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cd85503460f949a18c5/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Find the 4 presuppositions that can be inferred from this utterance:
John regrets that he stopped doing linguistics before he left MUIC.
John stopped doing linguistics before he left MUIC.
John was doing linguistics before he left MUIC. John left MUIC. John had been at MUIC.
Presupposition
![Page 50: The meaning of language. So far we have considered language from a structural perspective, with relatively little concern for meaning. But (obviously)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cd85503460f949a18c5/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Often speakers infer or conclude based on not only what has been said but on what the speakers intentions are.
1. It’s quite warm in here. (Situation: you are in the classroom.)
2. Can you pass me a tissue? (you are in the canteen)
Implicatures
![Page 51: The meaning of language. So far we have considered language from a structural perspective, with relatively little concern for meaning. But (obviously)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cd85503460f949a18c5/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Quick exercise: Each of the sentences has at least one implicature. What is
it?
Implicatures
Statement Situation
It’s getting late. You and your friends are at a night club and it’s 4 a.m.
Most of the food is gone. You arrived at a cocktail party late.
The restaurants are open until midnight.
It’s 10p.m. and you didn’t have dinner yet.
If you weren’t so fat this wouldn’t hurt so badly.
Someone is standing on your toe.
John or Mary made a mistake.
You’re their boss and looking at some work they have done.
![Page 52: The meaning of language. So far we have considered language from a structural perspective, with relatively little concern for meaning. But (obviously)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cd85503460f949a18c5/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Performative sentences Language can be used to do things. It can be used to
make promises, bets, issue warnings, offer congratulations.
I warn you; I have a big brother. I bet you that ManU will win. I challenge you to a match. I fine you 100000Baht for possession of drugs. I nominate Abbhisit for a Nobel prize. I promise I will improve. I resign! I pronounce you husband and wife
Speech acts
![Page 53: The meaning of language. So far we have considered language from a structural perspective, with relatively little concern for meaning. But (obviously)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cd85503460f949a18c5/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
In performative sentences, the speaker is always the subject.
Performative sentences are always in present tense.
A test to determine if a sentence contains a performative verb is to begin the sentence with I hereby. Only performative sentences sound right when this is done:
I hereby declare war on you.*I hereby know you.
Performative verbs
![Page 54: The meaning of language. So far we have considered language from a structural perspective, with relatively little concern for meaning. But (obviously)](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062515/56649cd85503460f949a18c5/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Quick exercise: Determine which of the following sentences are
performative. Use ‘hereby’1. I testify that she is innocent.2. I know that she is innocent.3. He bet her 1000Baht that the yellow shirt
would win.4. I teach the class.5. I dismiss the class.6. I resign from this lousy job.7. I resigned from this lousy job.
Performative verbs