the mcat exam: year at a glance 2015 · pdf filethe mcat exam: year at a glance 2015. 2 what...

25
©2015 AAMC. May be reproduced and distributed with attribution and without alteration by and within AAMC member organizations only. The MCAT Exam: Year at a Glance 2015

Upload: vonhu

Post on 24-Feb-2018

223 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

©2015 AAMC. May be reproduced and distributed with attribution and

without alteration by and within AAMC member organizations only.

The MCAT Exam:

Year at a Glance

2015

2

What we will talk about today?

1. How is the new MCAT exam different from the old?

2. What are the characteristics of students who took the new exam?

3. How did examinees prepare for the new test?

4. How well did the new score scales work?

5. How well did examinees score on the new test?

6. Which 2015 examinees applied for 2016 admission?

7. What information is available about the predictive validity of scores from the new exam?

8. What else will we learn about the impact, use, and validity of the new exam?

3

How is the new MCAT exam different from the old?

4

New MCAT shifts the focus from testing what students know to testing how well they use what they know.

• Asks students to apply knowledge by solving scientific problems and reasoning about research and data

• Requires broader preparation

• Gives attention to behavioral and sociocultural aspects of health

• Incorporates the latest science on information processing

5

It tests new concepts and skills.

Content New MCAT Exam Old MCAT

Exam

Biology

Chemistry

Physics

Verbal reasoning

Biochemistry

Psychology

Sociology

6

The new exam has four sections.

7

What are the characteristics of students who took the new exam?

8

Students took the new exam in the same proportions as they took the old exam.

Percentage of Examinees Taking the New MCAT Exam by Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Fee Assistance Status, Testing Condition, and Repeater Status

(N=59,996)

46%54%

48%11%11%

26%1%<1%

4%

94%6%

99%1%

93%7%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

MaleFemale

WhiteBlack

HispanicAsian

American Indian/Alaska NativeNative Hawaiian/Pacific Islander

Other

Did Not ReceiveReceived

StandardNonstandard

Non-RepeaterRepeater

Race/Ethnicity1,2

Fee Assistance

Testing Condition3

Repeater Status4

9

How did examinees prepare for the new test?

10

Higher percentages of examines took biochemistry, psychology, sociology, and statistics courses than in the past.

Percentage of Examinees Taking the New MCAT Exam Who Completed College Coursework in the Natural, Behavioral, and Social Sciences or MCAT

Preparation Courses (N=59,996)

77%

79%

43%

37%

76%

91%

83%

95%

91%

7%

43%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Biochemistry

Psychology

Sociology

Research Methods

Statistics

Biology

General Chemistry

Organic Chemistry

Physics

From a university/medical school

Commercial

Coursework1

MCATPreparation Courses

11

How well did the new scorescales work?

12

The new test needs new scores.

• New and old exam test different knowledge and skills, requiring a new score scale

• New score reports pair scores with percentile ranks that help attach new meaning to scores

• Percentile ranks for 2015 scores were calculated by weighting the data from early examinees to reflect a typical testing year

13

The distribution of scores from the full testing year was similar to the distribution of weighted scores for early examinees.

472 476 480 484 488 492 496 500 504 508 512 516 520 524 528

Full Year (mean = 499.6; N = 64,504)

472 476 480 484 488 492 496 500 504 508 512 516 520 524 528

0.0%

0.5%

1.0%

1.5%

2.0%

2.5%

3.0%

3.5%

4.0%

Early Examinees(mean = 500.0; N = 11,251)

MCAT Total Score MCAT Total Score

14

How well did examinees score on the new test?

15

For every group, there was wide variation in scores.

Ne

w M

CA

T T

ota

l S

co

res

fo

r 2

01

5 E

xa

min

ees

Ov

era

ll a

nd

by

Ge

nd

er,

Ra

ce

/Eth

nic

ity,

Fe

e

As

sis

tan

ce S

tatu

s,

Te

sti

ng

Co

nd

itio

n,

an

d

Re

pea

ter

Sta

tus (

N=

64

,504

)1

472 476 480 484 488 492 496 500 504 508 512 516 520 524 528

Repeater - 2nd attempt (mean = 497.4; N = 4,423)

Repeater - 1st attempt (mean = 495.4; N = 4,423)

Non-repeater (mean = 500.1; N = 55,573)

Nonstandard (mean = 500.9; N = 465)

Standard (mean = 499.6; N = 64,039)

Received (mean = 495.0; N = 3,685)

Did Not Receive (mean = 499.9; N = 60,819)

Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander (mean = 496.6; N =…

American Indian or Alaska Native (mean = 496.4; N = 614)

Asian (mean = 500.8; N = 15,765)

Hispanic (mean = 494.8; N = 6,793)

Black or African American (mean = 492.6; N = 6,895)

White (mean=501.6; N = 29,217)

Female (mean = 498.3; N = 35,240)

Male (mean = 501.2; N = 29,125)

Total (mean = 499.6; N = 64,504)

Gender

Race/Ethnicity2

Fee Assistance

Testing Condition3

RepeaterStatus4

Total

16

Which 2015 examinees applied for 2016 admission?

17

The median score of 2016 applicants is slightly higher than that of 2015 examinees

New MCAT Total Scores for 2015 Examinees and 2016 Applicants

18

What information is available about the predictive validity of scores from

the new exam?

19

Scores from the Psychological, Social, and Biological Foundations of Behavior section prototype correlate well with grades in several types of courses.

20

Correlations between MCAT scores on the prototype and grades in foundations of psychiatric medicine were higher than correlations with the old section scores.

21

What else will we learn about the impact, use, and validity of

the new exam?

22

The validity research is just beginning.

Admissions officers and researchers from 18 medical are starting a validity research program

• Determine how well scores from new exam predict performance in medical school

• Examine how students prepare for the exam

• Determine whether there are ways to improve information and resources available

• Study how scores are used with other information in admissions decision making

Fairness will play a key role. Results will be reported annually.

24

Applicants with old and new scores

• 34% who took the new exam also took the old

• Applicants who took both had higher percentiles on the new exam than the old.

• Why?

1) Repeaters start with lower scores.

2) Repeater percentile ranks on old and new tests were similar in size.

3) Examinees with higher percentile ranks ultimately apply to medical school.

25

Distributions of section scores on the new MCAT Exam