the making of scientific and arrogant europe
DESCRIPTION
In 1837 a Bengal cavalry officer, after an exploratory tour of Egypt and Arabia in connection with steam navigation, declared in his report: ‘It seems to be a law of nature that the civilized nations should conquer and possess the countries in a state of barbarianism and by such means, however unjustifiable it may appear at first, extend the blessings of knowledge, industry and commerce among people hitherto sunk in the most gloomy depths of superstitious ignorance.’ Till the early decades of the 19th century, Europe viewed Asia with respect. How the change occurred is discussed hereTRANSCRIPT
The Making of Scientific, Industrial and
Arrogant Europe
Rajesh KochharPresident IAU Commission 41: History of Astronony
Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Mohali, Punjab
27 July 2013
It is no more than a coincidence that
the first British ship reached the
Indian coast the same year (1608)
the telescope was invented in The
Netherlands. This numerology
brings home the fact that modern
science
and technology grew hand in hand
with maritime trade, colonial
expansion and dominance over
nature and fellow human beings.
The key developments are these:
(1) For reasons of healthcare, human
curiosity and commerce, medical
botany and natural history of distant
lands were studied through
interaction with the native
population.
(2)For the safety of navigation,
scientific instrumentation and exact
sciences were developed as a self-
contained European exercise.
(3) Similarly, development of
machinery to replace the Indian.
was a self-contained British
exercise.
(4)Dying and printing processes
involved Europe at large and
required intelligence from India.
In 1742, on instructions from his
superiors, the South India based
Jesuit Gaston Laurent Coeurdoux
(1691-1779) collected information
from dyers whom he had converted
and sent the account to Europe,
where it was widely read and where
it remained relevant for a long time.
It is a measure of the priorities of the
time that Coeurdoux ‘s fundamental
work as a pioneering researcher in
philology went unnoticed.
The special process of Turkish red ,
used the Indian Chaya root and
Kasha leaves. Introduced into France
by an Armenian, it baffled chemists
for a long time until it was cleared
up, in 1902, by a calico-printer at
Leyden, Felix Dreissen, who got the
secret from a native dyer in Madura
(south India).’2
In their 18th century encounters with
India and the East in general, the
trading nation of British displayed
genuine interest in, respect for, and
desire to benefit and profit from
traditional empirical technologies. In
the industrial Britain of the early
19th century, this admiration was
replaced by openly expressed
disdain. This is understandable. You
cannot lord over people you respect.
There is a persistent pattern in
Britain’s scientific and industrial
discoveries of the early 19th century.
Once a milestone was reached in
Western science, details of the steps
leading to it were obliterated, and
modern science and technology
presented as a stand-alone, without
any pre-history.
I would like to illustrate this with the
help of 3 examples: zinc, steel, and
vaccination.
India devised zinc metallurgy, before
Alexander’s time, to be able to prepare
high-zinc content gold-like brass for
making Buddhist idols.
As late as 1735, the Swedish chemist
Georg Brandt (1694-1768), who
identified cobalt as an element,
believed that ‘zinc could not be
reduced to metal except in the
presence of copper’.6
But, the commercial interests knew
better. In 1738, William Champion
(1709-1789) obtained a patent for
the extraction of pure zinc through
inverse distillation, and set up his
works in 1743.7
In the 18th century itself, Swedish/
German professors recorded that the
knowhow was brought into England
from the East even if they could not
agree whether it came from China or
India. Not surprisingly, there is no
English account. A 100 years
previously, in 1608, the Dutch
optician Hans Lipperhey was denied
a patent on the telescope, ‘on the
ground that it is evident that several
others have knowledge of the
invention’.
Metallic zinc may have been
common knowledge in India or
China, but in a Euro-centric world if
a thing was new for Europe it did not
exist before.
Indian steel
Since pre-Alexandrian times, India
had been producing high quality
steel by melting pure iron in the
presence of carbonaceous material.
Europe already knew about its
cutting-edge properties because the
Damascus swords made out of it
were used against the Christian
Crusaders. Specimens and some
details about the making of Indian
steel reached Europe when the direct
trade began. In 1675 Robert Hooke
noted in his diary: ‘bringing soe as to
melt made the best steel after it had
been wrought over again’. This was
significant because Europe had
earlier associated the properties
of steel not with the process but with
the quality of the ore.
Benjamin Huntsman (1704-1776)
has been invariably described as
‘English inventor of crucible
steelmaking’.
Was he inspired by the Indian
method? No contemporaneous
account would even admit the
question, leave aside discuss it.
James Moore Swank, US expert on
iron and steel, wrote in his 1892
History of the Manufacture of Iron
in All Ages that the details of
manufacture of Indian steel ‘in our
day’ ‘plainly suggest the crucible
process perfected by Huntsman’.
This came not from Britain but from
USA and that too when the 19th century
was coming to an end.
In a discussion on its own inventions and
discoveries, Europe did not consider the
Eastern antecedents to be relevant. But
when it came to the Indian scientific
tradition, the roots, real or imagined,
roots were considered more
important than the fruits.
Astronomy
Indian mathematical astronomical
tradition built over a millennium 6th
century CE onwards was dismissed
out of hand and its Greek origins
emphasized. There was of course no
mention of the post- Alexandrian
Egypt and Iraq inputs that went into
making of the Greek science.
Far greater ingenuity was exercised
in the case of chemistry.
Chemistry
When a 14th century chemistry text
(Rasaratnasamuchchaya) named 41
previous authors, it was declared
with a straight face that the names
were mostly apocryphal .10
Similarly, when the author of
another text Sanskrit text Rasasara
explicitly acknowledged his debt to
‘the traditions and opinions of the
Baudhas [ the Buddhists]’,
it was said that ‘ by Baudhas, the
author probably meant the
Muhammadans’.11
Surely Arabs would have liked to
hear that. But it was not considered
necessary to inform them. They in
their place were told that their role in
the world history of science had
been no more than as librarians and
archivists for preserving Greek
science till Europe was in a position
to take its heritage back.
Wootz
In the closing years of the 18th
century, samples of Indian steel
wootz were received in Britain , first
by chance and then on request. They
were investigated thoroughly
under the auspices of the Royal
Society. How significant the
introduction of wootz was can be
seen from the following:
About 1796, a wootz penknife was
presented to King George III.
•Sir Thomas Frankland sealed his letters
to Mushet ‘with the Sanscrit characters
denoting wootz, in full and prominent
display’.
• One of Stodart’s trade cards, dated
about 1820, carried the inscription:
J. Stodart, at 401, Strand, London,
Surgeon’s Instruments, Razors and
other Cutlery made from Wootz, a
steel from India, preferred by Mr
Stodart to the best steel in Europe.
• Examination of wootz samples (in UK)
yielded two patents ( Mushet 1800,
Mackintosh 1825) while another ( Heath
1839) resulted from an observation of
steelmaking in South India.
•Heath pointed out that Mushet’s and
Mactintosh’s patents were based on the
on the Indian process. The same
thing was later said about Heath by
Henry Bessemer (1813-1898) in his
autobiography.
•Faraday (1819) erroneously believed
that the strength of wootz came not from
the process but from the presence of
other materials. This was a fruitful error,
because it opened the new field of alloy
steels.
The influential British metallurgist John
Percy in 1864 called wootz making the
Hindoo process of steelmaking and its
furnace the Hindoo furnace. The
nomenclature is significant.
.
If it was a Hindu process, it called for
suitable Europeanization without
acknowledgement. ( Note that in India
itself historians used terms like Hindu
chemistry, Hindu mathematics, Hindu
sine.)
Smallpox
Variolation (inoculation with human
pox) was introduced in England in
1721, and vaccination (using
cowpox) in 1799. 20
Variolation continued to be practised
at the smallpox hospital in London
until 1822. It was altogether stopped
by an Act of Parliament in 1840.
In their time both variolation and
vaccination met with great hostility.
A smallpox hospital was opened in
London in 1746. ‘For a long time,
however, the prejudices against the
hospital were so great, that the
patients on leaving it were abused
and insulted in the street;
wherefore they were not suffered to
depart until the darkness of the night
enabled them to do it unobserved by
the populace’ .21
In the 1810s, Norwich city embarked
on a plan of persuading the poor to
get themselves vaccinated by paying
them a cash incentive of half a
crown. The plan in itself was quite a
success, but smallpox was not
extinguished.
Report of the Pauper Vaccination in
Norwich city for 1812–1813 pointed
out that the disease was ‘kept in
existence by unscrupulous
practitioners from London
who travelled to different places to
inoculate people with smallpox.
The only remedy lay, the Report
asserted, ‘in passing a law, imposing
a severe penalty on any one, directly
or indirectly concerned in the act of
variolous inoculation’.
---
Variolation had been practised in the
eastern parts of India since great
antiquity. Vaccination was officially
introduced in India in 1803.
Forgetting the resistance first the
introduction of variolation and then
of vaccination had met with in
Britain, the colonial government
wanted the Indians to overnight
become appreciative of the English
‘spirit of benevolence’ and express
gratitude for being conveyed ‘the
fruits of the happy discovery
[vaccination]’.23
In Calcutta, there were traditional
inoculators who variolated a small
fraction of the population creating an
epidemic. The situation was so
similar to the one that Norwich had
previously faced that paragraphs
from the Norwich Report were
plagiarized in the 1831 Calcutta
Report. This Report in turn was
enthusiastically cited in 1850 with
additional remarks:
‘in a country where practices such as
Suttee and Infanticide were, until
lately, deemed justifiable on the
score of Religious usage, neither will
there be wanting bigots to mislead
the ignorant Hindoos, and to
prejudice their credulous and simple
minds, against whatever may be
falsely represented to them as an
innovation, or an interference with
their religious priviledges .24
Note that when variolation is
practised in London even after
vaccination has been introduced,
smallpox inoculators are merely
called immoral and mischievous, and
sought to be dealt with by a strict
law. But when the same
phenomenon is observed in Calcutta,
memories of suttee and infanticide
are revived and the blame placed at
the door of Hindu bigotry, prejudice
and superstition.
Incidentally, if the British in India
had followed the Norwich model and
offered cash incentive to those
opting for vaccination, it is very
likely that prejudices against it
would have disappeared or at least
diminished.
England came a long way in the
period from the start of variolation in
1721 to its abolition in 1840. An
industrialized England was far more
confidant and arrogant than a trading
England had been. The period
around the 1830s was important for
a number of convergent reasons.
British machines were now able to
produce cloth that could quality-wise
compete with the best Indian weaver
had been producing using traditional
methods. (This is an important
epoch.)
•In 1835, the colonial government
brought its transition from the
Mughal administration to an end by.
introducing a new education policy:
i)Persian was banished from office.
ii)and generous support to Sanskrit,
Arabic and Persian learning was
discontinued.
iii)English was made the official
language ( Bentinck-Macaulay).
Significantly, the new Government
policy was facilitated by the
successful change in the missionary
position that had just taken place.
iii)English was made the official
language ( Bentinck-Macaulay).
Significantly, the new Government
policy was facilitated by the
successful change in the missionary
position that had just taken place.
priorities of the missionaries. They
now targeted elitist sections of the
society rather the marginal; and
focused on
The missionaries now targeted elitist
sections of the society rather the
marginal; and focused on English
rather than the vernacular. William
Carey made way for Alexander Duff.
To sum up, racial arrogance set in
when Britain’s transition from a
trading nation to an industrial power
was completed, that is when British
machines finally made the fine
Indian weaver entirely redundant.
In 1837, a Bengal cavalry officer,
after an exploratory tour of Egypt
and Arabia in connection with steam
navigation, declared in his report: ‘It
seems to be a law of nature that the
civilized nations should conquer and
possess the countries in a state of
barbarianism and by such means,
however unjustifiable it may appear
at first, extend the blessings of
knowledge, industry and commerce
among people hitherto sunk in the
most gloomy depths of superstitious
ignorance. ’26
Interestingly, the 1977 Cambridge
History of Africa, Vol. 5 (p. 495)
quotes this passage, but wrongly
says ‘ It seems to me’ rather than
‘It seems to be’, making the
observation personal rather than
universal.
The 1837 use of the phrase ‘law of
nature’ in the context of human
affairs is significant.
It is as if the authorship of the
powerful knowledge system of
modern science bestowed such
cultural and racial superiority on the
Europeans as to give them a divine
right to rule over others.
THANK YOU
1 Thomas 1924, p. 207.
2 Thomas 1924, p. 211.3 Hegde 1991, p. 58.4 Beckmann 1797, p. 75.5 Beckmann 1814, pp.72-73.6 Mellor 1957, p.403.7 Kochhar 1994. 8 Bergman 1788, p.317.9 Beckmann 1814, p.91.10 Ray 1918, p. 101.11 Ray 1918, p. 91.12 Mushet 1840, pp. 662-663
13 Mushet 1840, p.670.14 Hadfield 1932, pp.225-226.15 ‘Give me the fruitful error any time, full of seeds, bursting with its own correction. You can keep your sterile truth for yourself’- Vilfredo Pareto 1848-1923.16 Hadfield 1932, p.225.17 Heath however was unable to draw any financial benefit from his patent, because of its imperfect wording; see , e.g., Charles Dickens’ Household Worlds, 1853, Vol. 6, pp. 230-23218 Van Nostrand’s Eclectic Engineering Magazine, 1870, Vol. 3, No. 21, p. 280.
19 Percy 1864, p. 774.20 Shoolbred 1805, p. 1.21 Woodville 1796, p. 238.22 Shoolbred 1805, p. 9).23 Brimnes 2004, p. 221.24 Report of the Smallpox Commissioners, p 54, (Calcutta: Military Orphan Press).25 Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal 1814, Vol. 10. p. 124.26 Mackenzie 1837, p. 490.
References Bergman, Torbern (1784) Physical and Chemical Essays, Vol. 2, p. 314 (London: J. Murray).
Brimnes, N. ( 2004) Variolation, vaccination and popular resistance in early colonial South India. Med. History, Vol. 48, pp. 199–228.
Bronson, Bennet (1986) The making and selling of wootz, a crucible steel of India. Archaeomaterials, Vol.1, pp. 13-51.
Hadfield, Robert (1933) A research on Faraday’s ‘Steel and Alloys’. Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A, Vol. 230, pp. 221-292
Hegde, K.T.M.(1991) An Introduction to Ancient Indian Metallurgy (Bangalore: Geological Society of India).
Beckmann, Johann (1797) A History of Inventions and Discoveries, Vol. 3, pp. 71-99 (London: J. Bell).
James, C. (1810) Vaccination. In: A New and Enlarged Military Dictionary, Vol. 2 (London: T Eggerton)
Kochhar, Rajesh (1994) Smelting of ideas [zinc metallurgy]. Economic Times, 20 Aug.
Kochhar, Rajesh (2006) Smallpox in the modern scientific and colonial contexts 1721–1840. Journal of Biosciences, Vol. 36, pp. 1–8.
Mackenzie, James (1837) ‘Egypt and Arabia’, The Literary Gazette; and Journal of Belle Lettre, Arts, Sciences & co., No.1072, 5 Aug., pp. 489-492.
Mellor, J. W. (1957) A Comprehensive Treatise on Inorganic and Theoretical Chemistry, Vol. 4 ( London: Longman, Green and Co.).
Mushet, David (1840) Papers on Iron and Steel ( London: John Weale).
Ray, Prafulla Chandra (1918) Essays and Discourses (Madras: G.A. Natesan)
Shoolbred, J. ( 1805) Report on the Progress of Vaccine Inoculation in Bengal (London: Blacks and Perry).
Woodville W 1796 The History of Inoculation of the Small-pox, in Great Britain Vol. 1 (London: James Philips).