the magnitude of the dropout problem among …the magnitude of the dropout problem among indians was...

DOCUMENT RCSUME

ED 026 164 RC 003 037By-Selinger, Alphonse D.The American Indian High School Dropout: The Magnitude of the Problem.Northwest Regional Educational Lab., Portland, Ore9.Spons Agency-Bureau of Indian Affairs (Dept. of Ins-erior), Washington, D.C.Pub Date Sep 68Note-176p.EDRS Price MF-$0.75 HC-$8.90Descriptors-*American Indians, *Comparative Statistics, Dropout Rate, *Dropout Research, Dropouts,Educational Research, Ethnic Groups, Low Ability Students, Persistence, Sampling, School Statistics,*Secondary Grades, State Surveys, *Statistiral Data

Identifiers-Idaho, Montana, North Dakota, Oregon, South Dakota, WashingtonThe magnitude of the dropout problem among Indians was illustrated by a study

which followed students registered in grade 8 as of November 1962 through June1967. Statistics were gathered by area, state, type of school, tribal group, andmajority-minority position of Indian students in the 6-state area of Oregon,Washington, Idaho, Montana, South Dakota, and North Dakota. Related researchdealing with Indian dropouts was used as a framework for the data and as a basisfor comparison. No attempt was made to interpret the findings of the study since theprimary aim was to provide a base for future research into to extent of the problemof American Indian high school dropouts. (DA)

e4t,

''

'4r*

Alexander Junior High SchoolMAKAHNeah Bay Elemuntary School

Moc lips Junior High School

SWINOMISH

QUINAULTTULALIP Copp le Junior High School

COLVILLENespelem Eimentary School

Inchelium Elementary SchoolSPOKANE

Elementary School

Washington

\YAKIMA

Browning

-Asa

.1

BLACKFCutbank-

FLATHEAD

Ronan Elementary SchoolWapato Junior High &hool

COEURD'ALENE

St. Ignatius Elementary

Lapwai Junior High School

NEZ PERCE

Helen McCune Junior High School sr.",tr-tUMATILLA

C3WA11M SPRINGS

*Madras Junior High Sc.-hool

Idaho

FORTHALL

Hawthorne Junior High

rwimme.was.. =wTHE AMERICAN INDIANHIGH SCHOOL DROPOUT:The Magnitude of the Problem.=1

..

BLACKFEETCutbank Junior High School

Havre Junior High School

ROCKY BOYS

Hays Elementary Schoolentary School St. Paul Mission School

Elementary School

Montana

FORTBELKNAP

CROW

Poplar Elementary School

Hardin Junior High SchoolBusby Elementary School

NORTHERN McIntosh Elementary SchoolCHEYENNE i STANDING ROCK I

LkGrass Elementary School

i1

-

--7111w4St. Ana's Mission School nit TURTLE MOUNTAIN

NPw Town Elementary School

FORT BERTHOLDt.10-"*--'..-"

Fort Totten Elementary School

DEVILS LAKE

North Dakota

i.' Mr.ndaree High School

STANDING ROCKStanding Rock Community School

- sisseion Elementary SchoollLittle ale Day School Teltakwitiia

Indian Children's Home

South Dakota

SISSETON\/,

Pierre Boarding SchoolImmaculate Conception SchoolROW CREEK FLANDREAU 0

LOWER BRULE

LLe Junior High School ROSEBUD

Todd County Elementar SchoolHe Dog School \

St. Francis Mission School

St. Joseph's Indian School

YANKTONPine Ridge Elementary SchoolHoly Rosary Mission School

Locations of Forty Target Schools

THE AMERICAN INDIANHIGH SCHOOL DROPOUT:The Magnitude of the Problem

1

THE AMERICAN INDIANHIGH SCHOOL DROPOUT:The Magnitude of the Problem

By: Alphonse D. SelingerStudy Director

Edward C. Johnson, Study C:)-Director

U.S. DEPARTMENT Of HEALTH. EDUCATION & WELFARE

OFFICE OF EDUCATION

THIS DOCUMEV1 HAS BEEN REPRODUCED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROM THE

PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIGINATING IT. POINTS Of VIEW OR OPIRIONS

STATED DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT OFFICIAL OFFICE Of EDUCATION

POSITION OR )0LICY.

Consultants:

Robert R. Rath, Coordinator, Intercultural Programs

Michael C. Giammatteo, Research & Development Specialist

NORTHWEST REGIONAL EDUCATIONAL LABORATORY

The Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory is a nonprofitcorporation working with more then eight hundred member institu-tions in the Northwest United States to apply the findings ofresearch and technoloffical development to improve educationalpractice. This study is a part of the efforts of the Laboratory todevelop and disseminate data and conceptualizations useful in eval-uating and designing improvements in intercultural education. Theresearch reported herein was performed pursuant to a contractwith the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs.

A publication of

NORTHWEST REGIONAL EDUCATIONAL LABORATORY

4CC` Lindsay Building, 710 S. 1/17 Second Avenue

Portland, Oregon 97204

September, 1968

Acknowledgments

The research reported in this study was financed through a contract

with the Bureau of Indian Affairs, U. S. Department of the Interior.

To begin to thank individually the several hundred people who

cooperated in this research project would be an enormous task. We are

particularly indebted to all the superintendents, principals and teachers,

personnel (with agencies and area offices) of the Bureau of Indian Affairs,

tribal office officials and employees, staff members of State Departments

of Education, and the parents and relatives of many of the pupils. Without

their cooperation and assistance, this project would have been impossible.

Drs. Robert Rath and Michael Giammatteo of the Laboratory

contributed invaluable assistance in the formulation of the study, and in the

encouragement and suggestions which they offered at various times during

the course of the project.

Ed Johnson, study Co-Director, was particularly helpful in

establishing field contacts and in the collection of the data.

Appreciation is du.e Gary Echternacht, Research Statistician, for

suggestions on handling the data and for supervision of the coding; also to

the staff of the Laboratory Computer Division who frequently disrupted their

work schedules in order to work on this project.

Appreciation is also due Dan Stephens for execution of the cover

design and to him and other members of the Laboratory Communications

Division for review and suggestions regarding the format of this report. The

careful and meticulous work of Mrs. Bonnie Rosen in typing the final copy,

particularly the figures and tables, is gratefully acknowledged.

Finally, to Mrs. Isobel Rooney, Project Secretary, we express our

deep indebtedness. She served cheerfully and efficiently in managing the

detail of the office and the project, in assisting in data colis3ction and checking

its accuracy, and generously ministering to our needs while acting as factotum.

September, 1968Northwest Regional Educational LaboratoryPortland, Oregon

Al Se linger

ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Part

I. DTTRODUCTION. .

II.

Research Objectives .

Related Literature .

Research ProceduresSample. . .

Statistical Data on StudentsReferences .

FINDINGS . .

. .

Oregon . . .

Washington .

Idaho . 4

Montana . .

North DakotaSouth DakotaSummary of Dropout Rate in the Six-State Area .

Racial Balance by State in the Schools Includedin the Study . .

rn. CONCLUSION .

APPENDIX A:

APPENDIX B:

School Directory .

Directory of Tribes

±a4 wo--,.-rn

Page

1

1

2

5

6

7

8

9

111840478197

137

138

1

Ii

Li

I

: I

LIST OF TABLES

Table Page

1. Progressive Dropout Rate by Percentages to June, 1967,From a Target Population of American Indian StudentsEnrolled in Helen McCune Junior High School, Oregonin Grade Eight, November, 1962 . . . 12

2. Average Annual Attendance by Percentages to June, 1967,of Dropouts and Persisters From a Target Populationof 4 American Indian Students Enrolled in Helen McCuneJunior High School, Oregon in Grade Eight, November,1962. . 13

3. Average Annual Grades Translated to Letter Gradings toJune, 1967, From a Target Population of 4 AmericanIndian Students, Dropouts and Persisters, Enrolled inHelen McCune Junior High School, Oregon in GradeEight, November, 1962 . . 13

4. Progressive Dropout Rate, Madras Junior High School,Oregon. . . 15

5. Average Annual Attendance, Madras Junior High School,Oregon (N = 38) . . . 16

6. Average Annual Grades, Madras Junior High School,Oregon (N = 38) . .

7. Progressive Dropout Rate of American Indian Students trJune, 1967, From a Sample of Oregon Schools EnrollingTen or More Indian Students in Grade Eight as ofNovember, 1962 (N = 42) . . 17

8. Progressive Dropout Rate, Alexander Junior High School,Washington . 19

9. Average Annual Attendance, Alexander Junior High School,Washington (N = 14) . . 20

Table

10.

11.

12.

15.

16.

17.

18

19.

20.

21.

22.

23.

Average Annual Grades, Alexander Junior High School,

Page

Washington (N = 14) . . . 20

Progressive Dropout Rate, Copp le Junior High School,Washington . . . 22

Average Annual Attendance, Copp le Junior High School,Washington (N = 9) . . . 23

Average Annual Grades, Copp le Junior High School,Washington (N = 9) . . . . . 23

Progressive Dropout Rate, Inchelium Elementary School,Washington . . 25

Average Annual Attendance, Inchelium Elementary School,Washington (N = 7) . . . . . . 26

Average Annual Grades, Inchelium Elementary School,Washington (N = 7) . . 26

Progressive Dropout Rate, Moclips Junior High School,Washingthn . . . 28

Average Annual Attendance, Moclips Junior High School,Washington (N = 7) . . . 29

Average Annual Grades, Moclips Junior High School,\Washington (N = 7) . . . . 29

Progr,essive Dropout Rate, Neah Bay Elementary School,Washington . 31

Average Annual Attendance, Neah Bay Elementary School,Washington (N = 10) . . . 32

Average Annual Grades, Neah Bay Elementary School,Washington (N = 10) . . . .

Progressive Dropout Rate, Nespelem Elementary School,Washington . .

24. Average Annual Attendance, Nespelem Elementary School,Washington (N = 23) . . 35

Table Page

25. Average Annual Grades, Nespelem Elementary School,Washington (N = 23) . 35

26. Progressive Dropout Rate, Wapato Junior High School,Washington . 37

27. Average Annual Attendance, Wapato Junior High School,Washington (N = 21) 38

28. Average Annual Grades, Wapato Junior High School,Washington (N = 21) . . 38

29. Progressive Dropout Rate of American Indian Students,to June, 1967, From a Sample of 50% of WashingtonSchools Enrolling Ten or More Indian Students inGrade Eight as of November, 1962 (N = 91). 39

30. Progressive Dropout Rate, Hawthorne Junior High School,Idaho 41

31. Average Annual Attendance, Hawthorne Junior High School,Idaho (N = 10)

32. Average Annual Grades, Hawthorne Junior High School,Idaho (N = 10)

33. Progressive Dropout Rate, Lapwai Junior High School,Idaho .

. . 42

. 42

44

34. Average Annual Attendance, Lapwai Junior High School,Idaho (N = 23) .

35. Average Annual Grades, Lapwai Junior High School,Idaho (N = 23) . .

. 45

45

36. Progressive Dropout Rate of American Indian Studentsto June, 1967, From a Sample of 50% of Idaho SchoolsEnrolling Ten or More Indian Students in Grade Eightas of November, 1962 (N = 33) . 46

37. Progressive Dropout Rate, Browning Elementary School,Montana . ,1 48

38. Average Annual Attendance, Browning Elementary School,Montana (N = 79) . . . 49

Table Page

39. Average Annual Grades, Browning Elementary School,lVlontana (N = 79) . . 49

40. Progressive Dropout Rate, Busby Elementary School,Montana. . . . . 51

41. Average Annual Attendance, Busby Elementary School,Montana (N = 20) . . . .11. 52

42. Average Annual Grades, Busby Elementary School,1

Montana (N = 20) . . . . . . 52 1

.,43. Progressive Dropout Rate, Cut Bank Junior High School, 1

Montana . . . 54

44. Average Annual Attendance, Cut Bank Junior High School,Montana (N = 6) . . . . 55

45. Average Annual Grades, Cut Bank Junior High School,Montana (N = 6) . . . 55

46. Progressive Dropout Rate, Hardin Junior High School,Montana . . . 57

47. Average Annual Attendance, Hardin Junior High School,Montana (N = 17) . . 58

48. Average Annual Grades, Hardin Junior High School,Montana (N = 17) . 58

49. Progressive Dropout Rate, Havre Junior High School,Montana . . . 60

50. Average Annual Attendance, Havre Junior High School,Montana (N = 24) . . . 61

51. Average Annual Grades, Havre Junior High School,Montana (N = 24) . . 61

52. Progressive Dropout Rate, Hays Elementary School,Montana . . .. . 63

53. Average Annual Attendance, Hays Elementary School,Montana (N = 18) . . . 64

Table Page

54. Average Annual Grades, Hays Elementary School,Montana (N = 18) .

55. Progressive Dropout Rate, Lodge Grass ElementarySchool, Montana. . .

56. Average Annual Attendance, Lodge Grass ElementarySchool, Montana (N = 24). .

57. Average Annual Grades, Lodge Grass ElementarySchool, Montana (N = 24). .

. . 66

67

67

58. Progressive Dropout Rate, Poplar Junior High School,Montana . . . . 69

59. Average Annual Attendance, Poplar Junior High School,Montana (N = 39) . . . 70

60. Average Annual Grades, Poplar Junior High School,Montana (N = 39) . . 70

61. Progressive Dropout Rate, Ronan Elementary School,'Montana . . 72

62. Average Annual Attendance, Rona:n Elementary School,Montana (N = 11) . . 73

63. Average Annual Grades, Ronan Elementary School,Montana (N = 11) . . 73

64. Progressive Dropout Rate, St. Ignatius ElementarySchool, Montana. . 75

65. Average Annual Attendance, St. Ignatius ElementarySchool, Montana (N = 9) . . 76

66. Average Annual Grades, St. Ignatius ElementarySchool, Montana (N = 9) . 76

67. Progressive Dropout Rate, St. Paul's Mission School,Montana.

78

68. Average Annual Attendance, St. Paul's Mission School,Montana (N = 12) . 79

Table Page

69. Average Annual Grades, St. Paul's Mission School,Moncana (N = 12) . . . 79

70. Progressive Dropout Rate of American Indian Studentsto June, 1967, From a Sample of 50% of MontanaSchools Enrolling Ten or More Indian Students inGrade Eight as of November 1962 (N = 259) . . . 80

71. Progressive Dropout Rate, Ft. Totten ElementarySchool, North Dakota .

72. Average Annual Attendance, Ft.. Totten ElementarySchool, North Dakota (N = 10) . .

. 82

83

73. Average Annual Grades, Ft. Totten Elementary School,North Dakota (N = 10) . . . 83

74. Progressive Dropout Rate, Ft. Yates ElementarySchool, North Dakota . 85

75. Average Annual Attendance, Ft. Yates ElementarySchool, North Dakota (N = 37) . 86

76. Average Annual Grades, Ft. Yates Elementary School,North Dakota (N = 37) . 86

77. Progressive Dropout Rate, Mandaree High School,North Dakota . . 88

78. Average Annual Attendance, Mandaree High School,North Dakota (N = 10) .

79. Average Annual Grades, Mandaree High School,North Dakota (N = 10) .

. 89

. . 89

80. Progressive Dropout Rate, New Town Elementary School,North Dakota . 91

81. Average Annual Attendance, New Town ElementarySchool, North Dakota (N = 12) . 92

82. Average Annual Grades, New Town Elementary School,North Dakota (N = 12) 92

Table Page

83. Progressive Dropout Rate, St. Ann's Mission School,North Dakota. . . . 94

84. Average Annual Attendance, St. Arm's Mission School,North Dakota (N = 30) . . 95

85. Average Annual Grades, St. Ann's Mission School,North Dakota (N = 30) . . . 95

86. Progressive Dropout Rate of American Indian Studentsto June, 1967, From a Sample of 50% of NorthDakota Schools Enrolling Ten or More Indian Studentsin Grade Eight as of November, 1962 (N = 99), . . 96

87. Progressive Dropout Rate, He Dog School, SouthDakota . . . . 98

88. Average Annual Attendance, He Dog School, SouthDakota (N = 12) . . . 99

89. Average Annual Grades, He Dog School, South Dakota(N = 12) . . . 99

90. Progressive Dropout Rate, Holy Rosary Mission School,South Dakota . . . 101

91. Average Annual Attendance, Holy Rosary Mission School,South Dakota N = 50) . . 102

92. Average Annual Grades, Holy Rosary lvTission School,South Dakota (N = 50) . . . 102

93. Progressive Dropout Rate, Immaculate ConceptionMission School, South Dakota . . . 104

94. Average Annual Attendance, Immaculate ConceptionMission School, South Dakota (N = 22) . 105

95. Average Annual Grades, Immaculate Conception MissionSchool, South Dakota (N = 22) . 105

96. Progressive Dropout Rate, Little Eagle Day School,South Dakota . . . 107

t.

Table Page

97. Average Annual Attendance, Little Eagle Day School,South Dakota (N = 10) . . . . . . 108

98. Average Annual Grades; Little Eagle Day School,South Dakota (N = 10) . . . . . . . . 108

99. Progressive Dropout Rate, McIntosh Elementary School,South Dakota .

100. Average Annual Attendance, McIntosh Elementary School,South Dakota (N = 8) . .

101. Average Annual Grades, McIntosh Elementary School,South Dakota (N = 8) . . . . . . .

102. Progressive Dropout Rate, Pierre Boarding School,South Dakota . .

. 110

. . . 113

103. Average Annual Attendance, Pierre Boarding School,South Dakota (N = 70) . . . . . 114

104. Average Annual Grades, Pierre Boarding School,South Dakota (N = 70) . . . . . . 114

105. Progressive Dropout Rate, Pine Ridge Public School,South Dakota . .

106. Average Annual Attendance, Pine Ridge Public School,South Dakota (N = 11) . . . .

107. Average Annual Grades, Pine Ridge Public School,South Dakota (N = 11) . .

. . . . 116

. . . . 117

. . . . 117

108. Progressive Dropout Rate, Porcupine Day School,South Dakota . . . . . . . . 119

109. Average Annual Attendance, Porcupine Day School,South Dakota (N = 14) . . . . . . 120

110. Average Annual Grades, Porcupine Day School,South Dakota (N = 14) . . . . . . 120

111. Progressive Dropout Rate, Sisseton Elementary School,South Dakota . . . . . 122

Table Page

112. Average Annual Attendance, Sisseton ElementarySchool, South Dakota (N = 12) .

113. Average Annual Grades, Sisseton Elementary School,South Dakota (N = 12) . . . 123

114. Progressive Dropout Rate, St. Francis Mission School,South Dakota . . . 125

115. Average Annual Attendance, St. Francis Mission School,South Dakota (N = 23) . 126

116. Average Annual Grades, St. Francis Mission School,South Dakota (N = 23) . . . . 126

117. Progressive Dropout Rate, St. Joseph's Mission School,South Dakota . . . 128

118. Average Annual Attendance, St. Joseph's Mission School,South Dakota (N = 30) . . . 129

119. Average Annual Grades, St. Joseph's Mission School,South Dakota (N = 30) . . . 129

120. Progressive Dropout Rate, Tekakwitha Indian Children'sHome, South Dakota . . 0 . 131

121. Average Annual Attendance, Tekakwitha Indian Children'sHome, South Dakota (N = 8) . . . 132

122. Average Annual Grades, Tekakwitha Indian Children'sHome, South Dakota (N = 8) . . . 132

123. Progressive Dropout Rate, Todd County Elementary School,South Dakota . . 134

124. Average Annual Attendance, Todd County ElementarySchool, South Dakota (N = 46) . . . 135

125. Average Annual Grades, Todd County ElementarySchool, South Dakota (N = 46) . . . . 135

Table Page

126. Progressive Dropout Rate of American Indian Studentsto June, 1967, From a Sample of 50% of SouthDakota Schools Enrolling Ten or More Indian Studentsin Grade Eight as of November, 1962 (N = 316) . . . . 136

127. Progressive Dropout Rate of American Indian Studentsto June, 1967, From a Sample of 50% of Schools ina Six-State Area Enrolling Ten or More.IndianStudents in Grade Eight as of November, 1962(N = 840) . . . . . . . . . 137

LIST OF FIGURES

- Figure Page

1. Helen McCune Junior High School, Pendleton, Oregon,Movement of Indian Students Through Schools, Nov. 1962-June, 1967 . . . . . . . 11

2. Madras Junior High School, Madras, OregonMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . 14

3. Alexander Junior High School, Ferndale, WashingtonMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . . 18

4.- Copp le Junior High School, Omak, WashingtonMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . . . . 21

5. Inchelium Elementary School, Inchelimn, WashingtonMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . . . 24

6. Moc lips Junior High School, Moc lips, WashingtonMovement of Indian Students Through Schools .

7. Neah Bay Elementary School, Neah Bay, WashingtonMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . .

., . . 27

. . . 30

8. Nespelem Elementary School, Nespelem, WashingtonMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . . . 33

9. Wapato Junior High School, Wapato, WashingtonMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . . . . 36

1

10. Hawthorne Junior High School, Pocatello, IdahoMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . . . . 40

11, Lapwai Junior High School, Lapwai, IdahoMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . . 43

12. Browning Elementary School, Browning, MontanaMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . . . . 47

I.

Figure Page

13. Busby Elementary School, Busby, MontanaMovement of Indian Students Through Schools .

14. Cut Bank Junior High School, Cut Bank, MontanaMovement of Indian Students Through Schools .

15. Hardin Junior High School, Hardin, MontanaMovement of Indian Students Through Schools .

16. Havre Junior High School, Havre, MontanaMovement of Indian Students Through Schools .

. 50

. 53

. 56

. 59

17. Hays Elementary School, Hays, MontanaMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . 62

18. Lodge Grass Elementary School, Lodge Grass, MontanaMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . . 65

19. Poplar Junior High School, Poplar, MontanaMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . 68

20. Ronan Elementary School, Ronan, MontanaMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . 71

21. St. Ignatius Elementary School, St. Ignatius, MontanaMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . 74

22. St. Paul's Mission School, Hays, MontanaMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . 77

23. Ft. Totter. Elementary School, Ft. Totten, North DakotaMovement of Indian Sti ;dents Through Schools . . . 81

24. Ft. Yates Elementary School, Ft. Yates, North DakotaMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . . 84

25. Mandaree High School, Mandaree, North DakotaMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . 87

26. New Town Elementary School, New Town, North DakotaMovement of Indian Students Through Schools 90

27. St. Ann's Mission School, Belcourt, North DakotaMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . 93

..

L

U

U

i1

ii

Li

Figure Page

28. He Dog School, Mission, South DakotaMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . . . . . 97

29. Holy Rosary Mission School, Pine Ridge, South DakotaMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . 100

30. Immaculate Conception Mission School, Stephan, South DakotaMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . 103

31. Little Eagle Day School, Little Eagle, South DakotaMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . . . . . 106

32. McIntosh Elementary School, McIntosh, South Dakot2..Movement of Indian Students Through Schools . . . 109

33. Pierre Boarding School, Pierre, South DakotaMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . . . . 112

34. Pine Ridge Public School, Pine Ridge, South DakotaMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . . . . 115

35. Porcupine Day School, Porcupine, South DakotaMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . . . . 118

36. Sisseton Elementary School, Sisseton, South DakotaMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . . . . 121

37. St. Francis Mission School, St. Francis, South DakotaMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . . . 124

38. St. Joseph's Mission School, Chamberlain, South DakotaMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . 127

39. Tekakwitha Indian Children's Home, Sisseton, South DakotaMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . 130

40. Todd County Elementary School, Mission, South DakotaMovement of Indian Students Through Schools . . . 133

-

PART I

INTRODUCTION

Research Objectives

Repeated inquiries are made about the number of American Indian

students who progress or drop out of school from grade 8 through grade 12.

The response of the Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory to the dearth

of information which triggered the inquiries was to launch this study to collect

recent. hard data on the education of Indian youth. The Laboratory expects to

use the findings of the study as part of the base which will be utilized in the

formulation of some of its activities. So a general purpose of this study is to

provide some data for organizations and agencies which may lead to indepth

studies, to development of experimental progrmns, and to more rational

decisions about the education for Indian students.

Specific objectives of the study were:

To provide a statistical report of progress and dropouts of Indian

students registered in grade 8 as of November, 1962 through June,

19 / by area, state, type of school, tribal group, and the majority-

minority position of Lndian students in the schools in the six-state

area Of Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana, and North and South

Dakota.

2

To develop and demonstrate a feasible system for data collection on a

continuing basis.

Related Literature

There is no intent in this study to draw inferences from or to interpret

the data reported. The following infornation from recent studies, far from

exhaustive, is presented in order to provide a framework for the data of the

study and a base for comparison. The reader is cautioned that the factors

which are characteristic of the dropout are extremely complex. In the absence

of most of these factors from this study, casual inferences regarding the cause

of dropouts are unwarranted. The statistical data of this study is useful only

in assessing the magnitude of the problem of the Indian high school dropout in

the northwest United States.

Studies do not agree on the number of dropouts in the American school

population. The reasons for the disagreement are to be found partially in the

v,arying definitions of "dropout" and partially in the varying methodologies

utilized for ascertaining the number of dropouts. One summary of the

literature1 reports public high school graduates in 1965-66 as a percent of

ninth graders in the fall of 1962. For the total United States this percent is

listed as 77.3 percent. For the states in which this study is thterested, the

figures are:

Oregon: 83.5% Montana: 83.6%Washington: 85.7 % North Dakota: 84.0%Idaho: 79.9% South Dakota: 85.6%

3

Or, put in another way, the dropout rate from the ninth to twelfth grades from

1962 to 1966 was 22.17 percent for the United States as compared with a drop-

out rate of 16.3 percent for the six-state region. Apker, 2 in his survey,

estimates that less than 40 percent of Indian high school entrants graduate as

compared to 60 percent of all American students. Spilka and Bryde3 state

that on a national level in the 1963 school year dropouts averaged 23 percent

of the school population as compared with a dropout rate for Indian students of

about 60 percent.

The State Department of Instruction in a study of the South Dakota

secondary school (grades 9-12) dropout population in 1963-64 showed that 59

percent of Indian dropouts occur in the ninth grade compared with 20 percent

for non-Indians.

An as yet unpublished study4 compared eighth grade students on the

Pine Ridge Reservation who subsequently dropped from school with those who

remained. It was found that 57 percent of dropouts are boys compared with

48 percent in the school population; 67 percent of dropouts are from country

districts as compared to 50 percent from country districts in the total school

population; dropouts tended to be older at entrance to ninth grade (64 percent

were 16 years of age or over) compared to those who remained (81 percent

were 15 years of age or under); dropouts achieved a mean score on the 28th

percentile in the Iowa test of educational achievement as compared to a mean

score on the 42nd percentile for those remaining.

4

Karrigan 5 concluded in a study on the Tula lip Reservation in

Washington State that Indians had a consistent school performance record; low

but consiste it with the status of their mental age, readiness and attendance.

The conclusions were based on the follnwing fnotnrs.

Ac..... One-half of Indian students were over the average age in their

classes compared to one-seventh of the non-Indians.

Achievement: Indian achievement was closest to the non-Indian in

grade 4 with the gap widening thereafter and the greatest disparity in

achievement reached in high school.

Retention in grades: Much greater with Indians.

Attendance: The mean in a school year of 130 days ranged, for

Indians, from 141-156 days and for non-Indians from 168-173 days.

Johnson, 6 in a comparative study of educational attainment of Warm

Springs Indians and non-Indians, concluded that with the exception of a few spe-

cific instances the analysis of educational attainment factors for the period

1955-1965 inclusive indicated that the Indians showed no gain compared with

non-Indians. More specifically, comparing Indians with non-Indians:

Gain was shown for the factor of age retardation or overage in grade;

No gain was shown for the factor of the dropoui, rate;

No gain was shown for the factor of intelligence quotient. score;

Regression was shown when the factor of graduation rate was

considered; and

Regression was shown when the factor of grade point average was

considered.

Research Procedures

5

The following criteria were used to determine the schools from which

a stratified random sample was drawn.

1. State and Area: Schools and tribal groups had to be in those

portions of the states of Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana,

North and South Dakota which were included in the Aberdeen,

Billings; and Portland area jurisdiction for the Bureau of Indian

Affairs.

2. Tribal Units: Tribal units were determined by state as derived

from the 1962-63 census of tribes. Tribal units of less than 200 .

population were deleted. An Indian was defined as an individual

who possessed a blood quantum of one-fourth or more.

3. Schools: Schools with concentrations of Indian students from

tribal groups were identified through State Departments of Educa-

tion, the Bureau of Indian Affairs, and public and private school,

authorities. Schools with less than 10 Indian students enrolled in

grade 8 in 1962-63 were to be deleted. Because schools over-

estimated totals of Indian students, usually because they identified

pupils with less than one-fourth degree of Indian blood as Indians,

6

six schools are included in the sample with less than ten Indian

students registered in grade 8 as of November 1, 1962.

Schools were identified as having Indian students as a majority

(60 percent or more Indian), as a balance (40-59 percent Indian),

and as a minority (39 percent or less Lndian).

Schools were classified as public, private, federal, day, and

residential.

Sample

The stratified random sample was to comprise 50 percent of the

schools in each state drawn from the schools which qualified under the specific

criteria for the study. Actually 40 schools or 56.3 percent were drawn as the

sample of a total of 71 schools which qualified under the criteria for selection.

The target population, all Indian students in the 1962-63 grade 8

classes of the selected schools, were identified by name. Thereafter the pro-

gress of each student was traced through school to June, 1967 or dropout,

regardless of which school site was attended. The work of tracing the progress

of the students was carried out by field workers, usually employees of the

schools where the initial identification of the students was made. The data

was then checked by the project staff of the Portland office. School students

were guaranteed anonymity through the use of numerical coding as soon as the

basic data had been collected.

T

7

Statistical Data On Students

The term "dropout" is used in this study to designate a pupil who has

been in membership during the regular school term and who withdrew from

membership before graduating from secondary school or before completing an

equivalent program of studies. Such an individual is considered a dropout

whether the dropout occurs during or between regular school terms, whether

the dropout occurs before or after the compulsory school attendance age has

been reached, and if the minimum required amount of school work necessary

for graduation has not been completed except by reason of death.

Basic statistical data has been carried on each student as follows:

1. Area office

2. State

3. Tribal group

4. School for each grade attended

5. Percentage of school population who are Indian at grade 8 and 10

6. Type of school

7. Attendance

8. Grades at the close of each school year

9. Promotion/graduation

8

REFERENCES

1. Sherrell E. Varner, School Dropouts, Research Summary, Washington,D. C. , Research Division, National Education Association,1967, p. 8.

2. Wesley Apker, "A Survey of the Literature Related to Indian Pupil Drop-Out, " Unpublished M. Ed. Thesis, Washington State University,1962.

3. B. Spilka and J. Bryde, "Ahem-ton and Achievement Among Oglala SiouxSecondary Students, " Unpublished, 1965.

4. Donn Knudson cited by Eileen Maynard (ed. ), Pine Ridge ResearchBulletin, Bulletin No. 1, January, 1968, p. 27.

5. Cited by Wesley Apker, "A Survey of the Literature Related to IndianPupil Drop-Out, " Unpublished M. Ed. Thesis, Washington StateUniversity, 1962.

6. Robert S. Johnson, "Comparative Study of Educational Attainment of WarmSprings' Indians and Non-Indians for the Years 1956-1965 Inclu-sive," Unpublished Ed. D. Dissertation, Washington State Univer-sity, 1967.

PART II

FINDINGS

A major objective of this study was to document the magnitude of

the problem of the American Lndian high school dropout. In the following

pages the data, by schools and states, is presented in a series of figures and

tables. No attempt was made to interpret the findings. For example, the

reader will observe that the dropout rate for Indian female students in each of

the six states, with the exception of North Dakota, is considerably higher than

it is for the Indian male students. For the general population the reverse is

true. Speculation as to why Indian females drop out of school at a higher rate

than males, whether it be for pregnancy or early marriage or greater

irrelevancy of education for the female or because lesser value is placed on

the formal education of females by the Indian population or for some other

reason, is left to the reader pending further research into the matter.

Comparison of dropout rates between schools or tribes was

purposefully omitted from the study. Such comparisons are invidious because

of the varying numbers of pupils in the schools and particularly because of

the wide differences in the educational objectives pursued by the schools as a

result of the composition of their student bodies.

10

There are apparent differences, particularly in the tables of figures

on average annual grades and average annual attendance, between the total

number listed for the target population and the total number of pupils for

whom averages were computed. Where such discrepancies are noted, the

reason lies in that many schools did not keep records and thus the information

was unobtainable. These schools, espe2ial1y boarding schools, took for

granted that all their students were in one hundred percent attendance. Some

schools did not record a grade score when granting a social, rather than

earned, promotion to a student.

-

'

r1

rii

1:=

.-a-

Z

:YE

AR

1 (

1962

-63)

Gra

de 8

2 (1

963-

64)

Hel

en M

cCun

e ju

nior

Hig

h Sc

hool

>H

elen

McC

une

Jr. H

igh

Pend

leto

n, O

re.

(4)

(4)

Stud

ent T

otal

N 4

4

*DD

ropo

utP

- Pe

rsis

ter

G -

Gra

duat

e

0

4 4,

3 (1

964-

65)

4 (1

965-

66)

McE

wen

H S

Ath

ena,

Ore

.M

cEw

en H

S(1

)(1

)

NPe

ndle

ton

H S

Pend

leto

n, O

re,

(3)

5 (1

966-

67)

*DP

G

\\41

Pend

leto

n H

S..

> P

endl

eton

H S

(3)

-2

Que

ene

Ann

H S

Seat

tle, W

ash. 1

2 1

44

(3)

3

FIG

. 1(H

elen

McC

une)

Mov

emen

t of

Indi

an S

tude

nts

Thr

ough

Sch

ools

, Nov

. 196

2 -

June

196

7

atiM

11.

I,.0

1

12

TABLE 1. PROGRESSIVE D.ROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN HELEN McCUNE JUNIOR

HIGH SCHOOL, OREGON IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8 TOTAL

Sex Totai N N % N % N % N % N % N %

Male 1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0

Female 3 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 33.3 0 0.0 1 33.3

Total 4 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 25.0 0 0.0 1 25.0

-

I

3

12

0

3

it

,e 11

II 1

Il

13

TABLE 2. AVERAGE ANNUAL ATTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DROPOWIS tiNDPERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 4 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDATS ENROLLED

IN HELEN McCITNE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL. OREGON IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8

N % N C7ic N % N % N %

Dropout 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0. o 1 33.0 0 0.0

Persister 4 92.3 4 93.3 4 79.5 3 88.3 3 87.3

TABLE 3. AVERAGE ANNUAL GRADES TRANSLATED TO LETTER GRADINGS TO JUNE , 1967, FROMA TARGET POPULATION OF 4 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS.

ENROLLED IN HELEN McCUNE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, OREGONIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8

N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr.

Dropout 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 1 D 0 N. A.

Persister 4 B- 4 B- 3 B- 3 Bi- 3 C.:-

-3

r'O

rt'

.'

,41.

ft,

a,.

.'

v. .`"

"r

1v4

1"v.

,

1

YE

AR

1 (

1962

-63)

Gra

de 8

Mad

ras

Jr. H

igh

Mad

ras,

Ore

.(3

8)

nerz

as

2 (1

963-

64)

Riv

ersi

de I

nd. S

ch.

Ana

dark

o, O

kla.

(1)

Rob

t. Fa

rrel

lH

S (

Cor

rect

. )->

Rob

t. Fa

rrel

lSa

lem

, Ore

.(1

)(1

)

Stud

ent T

otal

N 3

8

*D -

Dro

pout

P -

Pers

iste

rG

- G

radu

ate

- 1

Dec

ease

d

Mad

ras

H S

(36)

,ilO

ON

VM

1.11

38

N

3 (1

964-

65)

Wyn

ne W

atts

H S

ortla

nd, O

re.

(1)

Riv

ersi

de I

nd.

(1)

Rob

e. F

arre

ll(3

)

Ben

d H

SB

end,

Ore

.(1

)

4 (1

965-

66)

Riv

ersi

de I

nd.

(2)

Rob

t. Fa

rrel

l(3

)

5 (1

966-

67)

*DP

GT

U. o

f O

rego

n' (C

orr.

)-

1

> R

iver

side

Ind

.-

-2

Rob

t. Fa

rrel

l1

-1

orth

Sal

em H

SN

orth

Sal

em H

SSa

lem

,(1

)(1

)

Mad

ras

H S

(27)

Chi

locc

o In

d. S

ch.

Clu

locc

o, O

kla.

(1)

\a1W

apat

oHS

Wap

ato,

Was

h.

McL

aren

Sch

.fo

r B

oys

\W

oodb

urn,

Ore

.(1

)

McL

aren

Sch

.(1

)

Mad

ras

H(2

4)

Sand

y H

SSa

ndy,

Ore

.(1

)

Cal

ifor

nia

(1)

(2)

-->

Wap

ato

I S

(1)

Ft. S

ill I

nd. S

eh.

Law

ton,

Okl

a,(1

)

37

>Pt

. Sill

Ind

.(1

)

effe

rson

H S

Port

land

, Ore

.(1

)

36

FIG

. 2(M

adra

s) M

ovem

ent o

f In

dian

Stu

dent

s T

hrou

gh S

choo

ls, N

ov. 1

962

- Ju

ne 1

967

Mad

ras

H S

32

1

Sand

y H

S

eht)

nrrn

TM

__4C

hi1o

cco

Ind.

(1)

11

%pa

to H

S

Ft S

t1)

1 Jeff

erso

n if

S1

1 2 1 2 1 1

(5)

(3)

(23)

20

t 15

TABLE 4. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE; I 967, FROM A TARGETPOP ULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN MADRAS JUNIOR

HIGH SCHOOL, OREGON IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67

Grath:8

--

7

ii

Li

TOTAL

Sex TOW N N % N % N % li 0m N % N re

Male 18 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 1 5. 6 2 11. 8 3 16. 7

Female 20 0 0. 0 1 6. 0 1 5. 3 3* 16. 7 3 21. 4 8 42. 1

Total 38 0 0.0 1 2.6 1 2.7 4 11.1 5 16.1 11 29.7

* - 1 Deceased

,x

,.

i

16

TABLE 5. AVERAGE ANNUAL ATTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DROPOUTS ANDPERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 38 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED

IN MADRAS JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, OREGON IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8

N % N cyio N % N ,,/0 N %

Dropout 0 0.0 7 90.0 1 77.0 4 73.8 3 78.3

Persister 37 90.8 33 92. V 33 92.6 32 90.9 25 88.8

TABLE 6. AVERAGE ANNUAL GRADES TRANSLATED TO LETTER GRADINGS TO JUNE, 1967, FROMA TARGET POPULATION OF 38 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS,

ENROLLED IN MADRAS JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, OREGONIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8


Dropout 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 1 D+ 2 D+ 2 C-i

Persister 35 C- 36 C- 35 D+ 31 C- 25 C-

-

w

-I 17

nTABLE 7 . PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS TO JUNE, 1967, FROMA SAMPLE OF OREGON SCHOOLS ENROLLING TEN OR MORE INDIAN STUDENTS

IN GRADE EIGHT AS CF NOVEMBER, 1962I

IiYear 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67

Grade 8 TOTAL

,

: U

Sex Total N Ivr 7d.0 N % N % N % N % N %

Male 19 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 5.3 2 11.1 3 15.8

Female 23 0 0.0 1 4.4 1 4.6 4* 19.1 3 18.8 9 40.9

Total 42 0 0.0 1 2.4 1 2,4 5 12.5 5 14.7 12 29.3

n*- 1 Deceased

-

,

1

1 1

I

j

1

,m

k

;4;

00i

i'";

;1-

,^"

'

'

koI,

44t,

YE

AR

1 (

1962

-63)

2 (1

963-

64)

Gra

de 8

Ale

xand

er J

unio

rH

igh

Scho

olFe

rnda

le, W

ash.

(14)

Stud

ent T

otal

N 1

4

*D -

Dro

pout

P -

Pers

iste

rG

- G

radu

ate

N.1

,A

1,Y

,

Ale

xand

er J

r. H

igh

(13)

3 (1

964-

65)

4 (1

965-

66)

00

5 (1

966-

67)

PG

Salt

Lak

e C

ity,

____

_) S

alt L

ake

City

,,

SP.I

t Lak

e C

ity,

Uta

hU

tah

Uta

h(1

)

Fern

dale

H S

> F

ernd

ale

H S

Fern

dale

H S

Fern

dale

, Was

h.(7

)1

23

5

1310

8(1

)(2

)(4

)6

FIG

. 3(A

lexa

nder

) M

ovem

ent o

f In

dian

Stu

dent

s T

hrou

gh S

choo

ls, N

ov. 1

962

- Ju

ne 1

967

r

19

TABLE 8. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967 , FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENIS ENROLLED IN ALEXANDER JUNIOR

HIGH SCHOOL, WASHINGTON IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8 TOTAL

Sex Total N N % N % N % N %

Male 8 0 0.0 2 25.0

Female 6 1 16.7 1 20.0

Total 14 1 7.1 3 23.1

0 0.0 1 16.7

2 50.0 0 0.0

2 20.0 1 12.5

N % N %

1 20.0 4 50.0

0 0.9 4 66.7

1 14.3 8 57.1

20

TABLE 9. AVERAGE ANNUAL ATTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DROPOUTS ANDPERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 14 AMERICAN INDLAN STUDENTS ENROLLED

IN ALEXANDER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, WASHINGTON IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 2962-63 196S-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8

N % N of/o N % N % N %

Dropout 1 82. 0 3 70. 0 2 69. 5 1 7. 0 1 94. 0

,.

44

Persister 13 9L 2 10 92. 2 8 93. 4 7 95. 6 6 92. 5_

TABLE 10 . AVERAGE ANNUAL GRADES TRANSLATED TO LETTER GRADINGS TO JUNE, 1967, FROMA TARGET POPULATION OF 14 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS,

ENROLLED IN ALEXANDER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, WASHINGTONIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8

N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Or.

Dropout 0 N. A. 2 D 2 D 1 D+ 1 D+

Persister 12 D+ 10 D+ 8 D+ 7 C- 5 C-

Ot,

<-

'ton

r---

1I

I=

t= t=

YE

AR

1 (

1962

-63)

2 (1

963-

64)

Gia

de 8

Cop

ple

Juni

or H

igh

Om

ak, W

ash.

(9)

Stud

ent T

otal

N 9

*D -

Dro

pout

P -

Pers

iste

rG

- G

radu

ate

ffi

r--- 3

(196

4-65

)

Oka

noga

n H

S>

Oka

noga

n H

SO

kano

gan,

Was

h.(1

)(1

)

4 C

oppl

e Ju

nior

Hig

h(6

)

,A

,SV

P

St. M

ary'

s M

issi

onO

mak

, Was

h.(1

)

r

1'1

7.7

SI `

.t i

:`.

"4*

-,

..

.

Om

ak S

r. H

igh

Om

ak, W

ash.

(5)

NM

ary

Wal

ker

H S

Spri

ngda

le, W

ash.

(1)

Oly

mpi

a H

SA

ubur

n, W

ash.

>O

lym

pia

H S

(1)

(1)

-

;

,,

,

4 (1

965-

66)

5 (1

966-

67)

P0

Chi

locc

o In

d. S

ch.

Chi

locc

o, O

kla.

(1)

Om

ak S

r. H

igh

(4)

Oro

ville

H S

Oro

ville

, Was

h.(1

)

Cou

lee

Dam

H S

Cou

lee

Dam

, Was

h.

Om

ak S

r. H

igh

13

> M

ary

Wal

kf:r

H S

>M

ary

Wal

ker

H S

(1)

1 4

-1

1

88

7(1

)(5

)6

FIG

. 4(C

oppl

e) M

ovem

ent o

f In

dian

Stu

dent

s T

hrou

gh S

choo

ls, N

ov. 1

962

- Ju

ne 1

967

AdA

.Ja

L\D

22

TABLE 11 PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN COPPLE JUNIOR


Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8 TOTAL

Sex Total N N % N % N 07/0 N % N % N %

Male 3 1 33.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 50.0 0 0.0 2 66.7

Female 6 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 16.7 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 16.7

Total 9 1 11.1 0 0.0 1 12.5 1 14. 3 0 0. 0 3 33.3

PTABLE 12. AVERAGE ANNUAL ATTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DRUPOUTS ANDPERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 9 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED

nIN COPPLE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, WASHINGTON IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

23

i]Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67

Grade 8

1-1

N % N % N % N % N %

Dropout 1 76.0 o o. o 1 85.0 1 13.0 o C. o

LI1-1

Persister 8 96.0 8 92.6 7 89.7 6 89.2 5 88.0

Li

1 1.1

TABLE 13. AVERAGE ANNUAL GRADES TRANSLATED TO LETTER GRAD:NGS TO JUNE, 1967, FROMA TARGET POPULATION OF 9 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS,

ENROLLED IN COPPLE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, WASHINGTONDIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

gYear 1962-63

Grade 81963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67

DN Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr.

Dropout 1 D o N. A. o N. A. o N. A. o N. A.

Persister 7 C- 8 C- 7 al- 6 D+ 5 C-

-.,

YE

AR

1 (

1952

-63)

Gra

de 6

Inch

eiiu

m E

lem

enta

rySc

hool

Inch

eliu

m, W

ash.

(7)

2 (1

963-

64)

3 (1

964-

65)

> I

nche

lium

H S

> I

nche

lium

H S

(7)

(7)

4 (1

965-

66)

5 (1

966-

67)

*DP

G

----

> I

nche

lium

H S

-->

Inc

heliu

m I

I S

(7)

77

Stud

ent T

otal

N 7

77

7-

(7)

7

*D -

Dro

pout

P -

Pers

iste

rG

- G

radu

ate

FIG

. 5(I

nche

lium

) M

cvem

ent o

f In

dian

Stu

dent

s T

hrou

gh S

choo

ls, N

ov. 1

962

- Ju

ne 1

967

,

25

TABLE 14 . PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, 1110M A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN INCHELIUM ELEMENTARY

SCHOOL, WASHINGTON IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63Grade 8

1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67TOTAL

Sex Total N N % N % N % N N el,G N a

Male 4 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0

Female 3 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0

Total 7 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0

26

TABLE 15. AVERAGE ANNUAL ATTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DROPOUTS ANDPERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 7 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLEL

IN INCHE LITIM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, WASHINGTON IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 19.32-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8

N % N % N % N % N %

Dropout 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0

Per sister 7 90.6 7 89.9 7 94.1 7 87.4 7 92.0


ENROLLED IN INCHELIUM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, WASHINGTONIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8

Av Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr.

Dropout 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 0 N. A.

Persister 7 C+ 7 B- 7 C+ 7 C+ 7 C+

14

I I

41.1

.201

.1

r,,

v.,.

440

%O

rr 4

,"*A

r0,

111c

ft.

r'

rrri

r

11

YE

AR

1 (

1962

-63)

Gra

de 8

Mo

clip

s J

unio

Hig

h Sc

hool

-M

oclI

ps, W

ash.

(7)

2 (1

963-

64)

r=1

1=1

ti=f

11-

7

3 (1

964-

65)

Hel

m H

S->

Hel

m H

S7I

Hoq

uian

i, W

ash.

(1)

(1)

>M

oclip

s H

S(6

)

Stud

ent T

otal

N 7

7

*DD

ropo

utP

Pers

iste

rG

- G

radu

ate

--->

Moc

lips

H S

(6)

4 (1

965-

66)

Whi

te P

ass

H S

Ran

die,

Was

h;(1

)

> M

oclip

s H

S(5

)

=T

iro

6 (1

968-

67)

*1)

PG

Chi

loco

o In

d. S

ch.-

->C

hilo

cco

Ind.

Chi

locc

o, O

kla.

-I

(1)

> M

oclip

s H

S-

4

Iv 4

6-

(5)

6

FIG

. 6(M

ocilp

s) M

ovem

ent o

f In

dian

Stu

dent

s T

hrou

gh S

choo

ls, N

ov. 1

962

- Ju

ne 1

967

IND

28

TABLE 17 . PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN MOC LIPS JUNIOR


Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8 TOTAL

Sex Total N N % N % N % N % N % N ato

Male 2 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0

Female 5 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 20.0 1 25.0 0 0.0 2 40.0

Total 7 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 14.3 3. 16.7 0 0.0 2 28.6

-,

iIi

29

TABLE 18. AVERAGt ANNUAL ATTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DROPOUTS ANDPERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 7 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED

IN MOC LIPS JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, WASHINGTON IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8

N % N % N % N % N %

Dropout 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 87.0 1 51.0 0 0.0

Persister 7 91.6 7 94.9 6 95.0 5 90.6 5 94.6


ENROLLED IN MOCLIPS JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, WASHINGTONIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8


Dropout 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 1 D- 1 C 0 N. A.

Persister 7 C- 7 D+ 5 D+ 5 D+ 5 C

YE

AR

1 (

1962

-63)

Gra

de 8

Nea

h B

ay E

lem

enta

rySc

hool

Nea

h B

ay H

S>

Nea

h B

ay H

S>

Nea

h B

ay H

SN

eah

Bay

, Was

h.(9

)(9

)(6

)(1

0)

2 (1

963-

64)

3 (1

964-

65)

4 (1

965-

66)

Lap

wai

H S

Lap

wai

, Ida

ho(1

)

Stud

ent T

otal

N 1

0

*D -

Dro

pout

P -

Pers

iste

rG

- G

radu

ate

Riv

ersi

de H

SC

alif

orni

a(1

)

CA

, 05

(196

6-67

)*D

PG

T

) N

eah

Bay

H S

21

34

Que

ene

Ann

H S

Seat

tle, W

ash.

(1)

109

7(2

)(1

)(3

)4

FIG

. 7(N

eah

Bay

) M

ovem

ent o

f In

dian

Stu

dent

s T

hrou

gh S

choo

ls, N

ov. 1

962

- Ju

ne 1

967

m

0

il

7

1

,

Sex

Male

Female

Total

31

TABLE 20. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN NEAH BAY ELEMENTARY


Year 1962-63Grade 8

1962-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67TOTAL

Total N N % N % N % N % N % N %

5 0 0.0 1 20.0 2 50.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 60.0

5 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 20.0 2 50.0 3 60.0

10 0 0.0 1 10.0 2 22.2 1 14.3 2 33.3 6 60.0

-

i

32


IN NEAH BAY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, WASHINGTON IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8

N % N % N % N % N %

Dropout 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 43.-5 0 0.0 2 95.0

Persister 10 88.7 9 89.2 7 92.1 6 81.5 4 81.3

TABLE 22. AVERAGE ANNUAL GRADES TRANSLATED TO LETTER GRADINGS TO JUNE , 1967, FROMA TARGET POPULATION OF 10 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS,

ENROLLED IN NEAH BAY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, WASHINGTONIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8


Dropout 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 1 D 1 D 2 C-

Persister 9 C- 8 C- 7 C- 6 C 4 C

YE

AR

1 (

1962

- 6

3)G

rade

8

Nes

pele

m E

lem

enta

rySc

hool

Nes

pele

m, W

ash.

(23)

II

r---

1-=

1.71

2 (1

963-

64)

.3

(196

4-65

)

Oth

ello

H S

/Oth

ello

, Was

h.(1

)

Cou

lee

Dam

H S

Cou

lee

Dam

, Was

h.(2

1)

4Con

cho

Dem

o. S

ch.

Con

oho,

Old

a.(1

)

Stud

ent T

otal

N 2

323

D -

Dro

pout

P -

Pers

iste

rG

- G

radu

ate

Whi

te S

wan

H S

Whi

te S

wan

H S

Whi

te S

wan

, Was

h.(1

)(1

)

Chi

locc

o In

d. S

ch.

Chi

locc

o, O

kla.

(1)

Cou

lee

Dam

H S

4 (1

965-

66)

5 (1

966-

67)

*DP

G

Cou

lee

Dam

II

SC

oule

e D

am H

S

r--

(17)

(15)

-14

14

Uta

h St

. Ind

st. S

ch.

Ogd

en, U

tah

(1)

Uta

h St

. Ind

st. S

ch.

(1)

'Eng

lew

ood,

Col

.1

-1

1916

(1)

(14)

15

FIG

. 8(N

espe

lem

) M

ovem

ent o

f In

dian

Stu

dent

s T

hrou

gh S

choo

ls, N

ov. 1

962

- Ju

ne 1

967

N

c

-

i

34

TABLE 23. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1961, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN NESPELEM ELEMENTARY


Year 1962-63Grade 8

1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67TOTAL

Sex Total N N % N % N % N % N % N %

Male 15 0 0.0 2 13.3 1 7.7 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 20.0

Female 8 0 0.0 2 25.0 2 33.3 1 25.0 0 0.0 5 62.5

Total 23 0 0.0 4 17.4 3 15.8 1 6.3 0 0.0 8 34.8

- - -

5

8

35


IN NESPELEM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, WASHINGTON IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-57

Grade 8

Dropout

Persister

0. 0

23 92.2

2 58.0

17 93.4

3 71.7

15 92.7

1 94.0

15 87.8

0 0.0

15 90.3

TABLE 25. AVERAGE ANNUAL GRADES TRANSLATED TO LETTER GRADINGS TO JUNE, 1967, FROM

A TARGET POPULATION OF 23 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS,ENROLLED IN NESPELEM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, WASHINGTON

IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63Grade 8

Av. Gr.

Dropout 0 N. A.

Persister 23 C

1963-64 1964-65

N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr.

I C 3 D

18 C- 16 C-

1965-66 1966-67

N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr.

1 D 0 N. A.

15 C+ 15 C+

YE

AR

1 (

1962

-63)

Gra

de 8

2 (1

963-

64)

Wap

ato

;!'u

nior

Hig

h Sc

hool

Wap

ato

H S

Wap

ato,

Was

h.(2

0)(2

1)

Stud

ent T

otal

N 2

1

*D -

Dro

pout

P -

Pers

iste

rG

- G

radu

ate

3 (1

964-

65)

4 (1

965-

66)

Eis

enho

wer

H S

',Yak

ima,

Was

h.(1

)

%C

oule

eD

arn

H S

Cou

lee

Dam

, Was

h.(1

)

21

Wap

ato

H(1

9)

Cou

lee

Dar

n H

S

t.o

5 (1

966-

67)

PG

-->

Eis

enho

wer

SE

isen

how

er H

S(1

)

Riv

ersi

de I

nd. S

ch.-

->

fllv

orsi

dc I

nd.

Ana

dark

o, O

kla.

-1

(1)

Wap

ato

H S

(12)

>W

apat

o If

S2

7

) St

even

son

II S

Stev

enso

n, W

ash.

1

8 1

Top

peni

sh H

ST

oppe

nish

H S

Top

peni

sh, W

ash.

--

11

(1)

Cou

lee

Dar

n H

SC

oule

e D

am H

S(1

)(1

)-

11

2115

FIG

. 9(W

apat

o) M

over

nevt

of

Indi

an S

tude

nts

Thr

ough

Sch

ools

, Nov

. 196

2 -

June

196

7

(1)

(12)

13

3 7

TABLE 26. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1961 , FROM A TARGET

POPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENIS ENROLLED IN WAPATO JUNIOR


Year 1962-63Grade 8

1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67TOTAL

Sex Total N N % N N % N % N % N %

Male 9 0 0.0 0 0. a 2 22.2 2 28.5 0 0.0 4 44.4

Female 12 0 0.0 0 0.0 4 33. 0 0.0 G 0. 0 4 33. 3

Total 21 0 0.0 0 0.0 6 28.6 2 13.3 0 0.0 8 38.1

38

TABLE 27. AVERAGE ANNUAL TTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DROPOUTS ANDPERSISTERS FROM A TARGE 1' POPULATION OF 21 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENT:3 ENROLLED

IN WAPATO JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, WASHINGTON IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1954-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8

N % N % N CVAl N % N %

Dropout 0 0.0 0 0.0 6 45.8 2 54.5 0 0.0

Persister 21 85.7 20 90.4 15 92.1 13 90.5 13 91.8

TABLE 28. AVERAGE ANNUAL GRADES TRANSLATED TO LETTER GRADINGS TO JUNE, 1967, FROMA TARGET POPULATION OF 21 AMEILICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS,

ENROLLED IN WAPATO JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, WASMNGTON .

IN 'GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63Grade 8

1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67

Av. Gr. N Av. Or. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr.

Dropout 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 4 D+ 1 D 0 N. A.

Persister 21 C- 20 C- 14 C- 13 C- 13 C-

11

39

TABLE 29. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS TO JUNE, 1967, FROMA SAMPLE OF 50% OF WASHINGTON SCHOOLS ENROLLING TEN OR MORE INDIAN

STUDENTS DI GRADE EIGHT AS OF NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67

Grade 8 TOTAL


Male 46 1 2.2 5 11.1 5 12.5 4 11.4 1 3.2 16 34.8

Female 45 1 2.2 3 6.8 10 24.4 3 9.7 2 7.1 19 42.2

Total 91 2 2.2 8 9.0 15 18.5 7 10.6 3 5.1 35 38.5

of

YE

AR

1 (

1962

-63)

Gra

de 8

Haw

thor

ne J

unio

rH

igh

Scho

olPo

cate

llo, I

daho

(101

2 (1

963-

64)

3 (1

964-

65)

Ala

med

a Jr

. Hig

h> A

lam

eda

Jr. H

igh

Poca

tello

, Ida

ho(1

)(1

)

--->

Haw

thor

ne J

r. H

igh

(8)

Bro

okly

n Ju

nior

Hig

hSa

lmon

, Ida

ho(I

)

Stud

ent T

otal

N 1

010

I 1

*D -

Dro

pout

P -

Pers

iste

rG

- G

radu

ate

4 (1

965-

66)

5 (1

966-

67)

*DP

CI

T

Chi

loce

o In

d. S

ch.

......

......

......

..,../

Chi

locc

o, O

kla.

(1)

Hig

hlan

d H

SPo

cate

llo, I

daho

----

> H

ighl

and

H S

(9)

(8)

./ Bla

ckfo

ot H

SB

lack

foot

, Ida

ho(1

)

--)

Chi

loce

n In

d.-

----

--->

Hig

hhm

d H

S3

14

5

99

(3)

(1)

(51

6

FIG

. 10

(Haw

thor

ne)

Mov

emen

t of

Indi

an S

tude

nts

Thr

ough

Sch

ools

, Nov

. 196

2-

June

196

7

41

TABLE 30. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN HAWTHORNE JUNIOR

HIGH SCHOOL, IDAHO IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63G.,..ade 8

1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67TOTAL

Sex Total N N % N % N % N % N CI/0 N %

Male 6 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 16.7 1 16.7

Female 4 0 0.0 1 25.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 66.7 3 75.0

Total 3 0 0 0.0 1 10.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 33.3 4 40.0

42


IN HAWTHORNE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, IDAHO IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 196465 1965-66 1366-67Grade 8

N % N % N % N % N %

Dropout 0 0.0 1 82.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 3 67.0

Persis ter 10 90.1 9 87.9 9 89.7 9 91.6 6 89.2

TABLE 32. AVERAGE ANNUAL GRADES TRANSLATED TO LETTER GRADINGS TO JUNE, 1967, FROMA TARGET POPULATION OF 10 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTEI1S,

ENROLLED IN HAWTHORNE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, IDAHOIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1'362

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8



Persister 10 C- 9 C- 9 C- 9 C- 5 C+

Y E

AR

1 (

1962

-63)

Gra

de 8

Lap

wai

Jun

ior

Hig

h Sc

hool

+>

Lap

wai

H S

Lap

wai

II

S*

Lap

wat

, Ida

ho(2

0)(1

4)(2

3)

2 (1

963-

64)

3 (1

964-

65)

Ft. S

ill I

nd. S

ch.

t Law

ton,

Okl

a.(1

)

Salt

Lak

e C

ity,

I U

tah

(1)

Stud

ent T

otal

N 2

3

*D -

Dro

pout

P -

Pers

iste

rG

- G

radu

ate

+ -

1 D

ecea

sed

Lap

wai

Jr.

Hig

h(1

)

Chi

locc

o In

d. S

ch.

Chi

locc

o, O

kla.

(1)

4 (1

965-

66)

5 (1

966-

67)

*DP

GT

Riv

ersi

de I

nd. S

oh.

Ana

dark

o, O

kla.

(1)

> S

alt L

ake

City

,U

tah

(1)

Uni

v. o

f Id

aho

(1)

-.C

hilo

cco

Ind.

Sch

.

-->

Riv

ersi

de I

nd.

--...

,...4

Lap

wai

H S

,.Lap

wai

H S

(13)

111

12

22

St. A

ntho

ny T

r. C

tr.

St. A

ntho

ny, I

daho

-1

1

-->

Chi

locc

o In

d. S

ch.

Chi

locc

o In

d. S

ch.

(2)

(1)

1-

2218

-

17(1

)(1

)(1

4)15

FIG

. 11

(Lap

wai

) M

ovem

ent o

f In

dian

Stu

dent

s T

hrou

gh S

choo

ls, N

ov. 1

962

- Ju

ne 1

967

CA

D

44

TABLE 33. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN LAPWAI JUNIOR

HIGH SCHOOL, IDAHO IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade S TOTAL

Sex Total N N % N % N % N % N cvm N %

Male 10 0* 0. 0 2 22. 2 1 14. 3 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 3 33. 3

Female 13 0 0. 0 2 15. 4 0 0. 0 1 9. 1 1 10. 0 4 30. 8

Total 23 0 0. 0 4 18. 2 1 5. 6 1 5. 9 1 6. 3 7 31. 8

0* - 1 Deceased

45


IN LAPWAI JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, IDAHO IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMI1ER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67

Grade 8

Dropout

Persister

N % N % N % N % N %

0 0.0 4 86.3 1 100.0 1 91. 0 0 0.0

23 91.8 18 92.8 17 94.0 15 93.7 15 f1. 7


ENROLLED IN LAPWAI JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, IDAHO

IN GRADE EIGHT , NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67

Grade 8

N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Ay. Gr. N Av. Gr.

Dropout 0 N. A. 4 D+ 1 D+ 1 C 0 N. A.

Persister 22 C- 18 C- 16 C+ 15 C 15 C+

46

TABLE 36. PROGRESSIVE DROPOU T RATE OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS TO JUNE, 1SC7, FROMA SAMPLE OF 50% OF IDAHO SCHOOLS ENROLLING TEN OR MORE INDIAN STUDENTS

IN GRADE EIGHT AS OF NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67

Grade 8 TOTAL

Sex Total N N % N -7io N % N % .py1, % N %

Male 16 0* 0.0 2 13.3 1 7.7 0 0.0 1 8.3 4 26.7

Female 17 0 0 0 3 17.7 0 0.0 1 ?. 1 3 23.1 7 41.2

Total 33 0 0.0 5 15.6 1 3.7 1 3.9 4 16.0 11 34.4

* 1 Deceased

1

}

1

]

YE

AR

1 (

1962

-63)

Gra

de 8

Bro

wni

ng E

lem

.B

row

ning

, Mon

t.(7

9)

2 (1

963-

64)

3 (1

964-

65)

Bus

by E

lem

.B

usby

, Mon

t,--4

. Bus

by H

S(1

)(1

)

Poca

tello

H S

Poca

tello

, Ida

ho(1

)

Chi

locc

o In

d. S

ch.

Chi

loce

o, O

kla.

(5)

77<

----

----

----

--._

____

____

___s

Bro

wni

ng H

SB

row

ning

, Mon

t,B

row

ning

H S

>B

row

ning

H S

Bro

wni

ng !

.1 S

(36)

46

2430

Popl

ar H

S

(43)

(45)

Pcpl

ar, M

ont.

> P

opla

r II

S(1

)-

-1

1

Poca

tello

H S

(1)

Chf

locc

o In

d, S

ch.

(5)

4 (1

965-

66)

5 (1

966-

67)

*I)

13G

T

Poca

tello

H S

(1)

Chi

locc

oSc

h.(3

)

Poca

tello

11

S

Cut

Ban

k *H

SC

ut B

ank,

Mon

t.....

.(1

)

>C

htIo

ceo

bid.

Sch

.1

1

1 2

>B

row

ning

Ele

m.

(4)

----

----

----

----

----

---.

.....

Stud

ent T

otal

N 7

9

*D -

Dro

pout

P -

Pers

iste

rG

- G

radu

ate

< -

Sch

ool N

on-A

ttend

ance

,Fi

andr

eau

Ind.

Sch

.jF

land

reau

, S. D

ak.

Bro

wni

ng E

lem

.(3

)

Flan

drea

u In

d. S

ch.

Flan

dron

u hi

d. S

ch.

> F

ludr

eau

Md.

Snh

,(6

)(8

)(8

)1

26

Nox

on H

SN

oxon

, Mon

t.H

SII

SU

S

(1)

--->

Nox

on(1

)--

).N

oxon

(1)

>11

0xon

1

6163

51(6

)on

(3:1

)

FIG

. 12

(Bro

wni

ng)

Mov

emen

t of

Indi

an S

tude

nts

Thr

ough

Sch

ools

, Nov

.-

'lune

196

'7

7 1

48

TABLE 37. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN ST1.:98WIS ENROLLED IN BROWNING ELEMENTARY

SCHOOI., MONTANA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVElasER, 1962

Year 1962-63Grade 8

1963-t34 i964-65 1965-66 1966-67TOTAL t

Sex Total N N % N % N % N N %

Male 40 5 12. 5 3 9. 1 A 12. 5 3 10. 7 3 12. 0 18 45. 0

Female 39 6 15. 4 2 7. 1 8 25. 8 3. 4. 4 2 9. I 19 48. 7

Total 79 11 13. 9 5 8. 2 12 29. 1 11 7. 8 5 10. 6 37 46. 8

_

49

TABLE 38. AVER.AGE ANNUAL ATTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DROPOUT!? AND

PERSISTEPS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 79 AMERICAN RiDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED

IN BROWNING ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, MONTANA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEVBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67

Grade 8

Dropout

Persister

N % N % N oio N av N a.0

11 55. 1 3 58. 0 n 49. 5 A 16. 5 5 66. 8

65 84. 5 54 87.1 50 89. 9 46 90. 2 39 90.3


A TARGET POPULATION OF 79 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS,ENROLLED IN BROWNING ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, MONTANA


Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67

Grade 8

Dropout

Persister


7 D 2 C+ 2 D 2 C 2 D

58 C- 49 C+ 48 C 44 C 37 C+

YE

AR

1 (

1962

-63)

Gra

du 8

2 (1

963-

64)

Bus

by E

lem

enta

ry S

ch.

Bus

by, M

ont.

Bus

by I

I S

(20)

(19)

Stud

ent T

otal

N 2

019

*D -

Dro

pout

P -

Pers

iste

rG

- G

radu

ate

< -

Sch

ool N

on-A

ttend

ance

Cal

ifor

nia

-/(1

)

3 (1

964-

65)

Bro

wni

ng H

SB

row

ning

, Mon

t.(1

)

--->

Bus

by H

S(1

2)

4 (1

966-

66)

01 0

5 (1

966-

67)

DP

0T

Mt.

Vie

w S

ch.

Riv

ersi

de I

nd.

Hel

ena,

Mon

t.(1

)A

nada

rko,

Okl

n.(1

)

Bus

Iv

\--

--)

II 1

5--

- B

usby

II

S(1

0)--

----

...,,,

-2

aA

*"...

......

z1 ) St

. Lnb

re I

I S

1

----

......

......

....

11

-I

i

St. L

abre

Mis

sion

ll S

Ash

land

, Mon

t.(1

)../

.---

--.

----

----

-1

\IC

alif

orni

a'(1

)

15

St. L

abre

H S

(2)

12

FIG

. 13

(Bus

by)

Mov

emen

t of

Indi

an S

tude

nts

Thr

ough

Sch

ools

,N

ov. 1

962

- Ju

ne 1

967

(1)

(3)

(6)

9

-

51

TABLE 40. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGET

POPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STE:DENIS ENROLLED IN BUSBY ELEMENTARY

SCHOOL, MONTANA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67

Grade 8TOTAL

Sex Total N N % N % N % N % N % N aay

Male 9 0 0. 0 1 11. 1 2 25. 0 0 0. 0 0 f.' 0 3 33. 3

Female 11 1 9. 1 3 30. 0 1 34. 3 2 33. 3 1 25. 0 8 72. 7

Total 20 1 5. 0 4 21. 1 3 20. 0 2 16. 7 1 10. 0 11 55. 0

52 A

TABLE 41. AVERAGE ANNUAL ATTENIDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DROPOUTS ANDPERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 20 AMERICAN INDIAN STUrgLNTS ENROLLED

IN BUSBY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, MONTANA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8

ye N % N % N % N %N c:

Dropout 0 0.0 3 75.3 2 63.5 1 41.0 1 88.0

Persister 11 82.0 14 81.3 9 91.6 9 87.3 4 78.5


ENROLLED IN BUSBY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, MONTANAIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63Grade 8

1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67

Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr.

Dropout 1 A 1 D 2 D+ 2 C 1

Persis ter 14 B- 14 C- 10 C- 10 C- 9 C-

YE

AR

1 (

1962

-63)

Gra

de 8

2 (1

963-

64)

3 (1

964-

65)

Cut

Ban

k Ju

nior

Hig

h>

Cut

Ban

k H

SC

ut B

ank,

Mon

t.(C

)

(6)

, .i.r

m-e

mvr

tl

4 (1

966-

66)

5 (1

96t3

-67)

*D13

-> C

ut B

ank

H S

> C

ut B

ank

II S

> C

ut 1

3nnk

11

S

(6)

(6)

14

.1E

ast V

alky

11

SSp

okan

e, W

ash.

1SO

Stud

ent T

otal

N 6

66

6(1

)(1

)0)

6

*D -

Dro

pout

P -

Pers

iste

rG

- G

radu

ate

FIG

. 14

(Cut

Ban

k) M

ovem

ent o

f In

dian

Stu

dent

s T

hrou

gh S

choo

ls, N

ov. 1

962

- Ju

no19

67C

AD

54

TABLE 43. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDEN 'i S ENROLLED IN CUT BANK JUNIOR

HIGH SCHOOL, MONTANA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8 TOTAL

iocr* cr/oSex Total N N % N cr N N N % N %

ginc-

Male 3 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0, C 0 0. 0 1 33.3 1 33.3

Female 3 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0

Total 6 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 1 16. 7 1 16.7

-.3

)

55

TABLE 44. AVERAGE ANNUAL ATENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DROPOUTS AND

PERSIETERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 6 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED

IN CUT BANK JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, MONTANA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67

Grade 8

N % N % N % N % N afo

Dropout 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 53.0

Persister 6 91.2 6 95.2 6 94.0 6 92.2 5 89.8


A TARGET POPULATION OF 6 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS,ENROLLED IN CUT BANK JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, MONTANA


Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67

Grade 8



Persister 6 C+ 6 C- 5 C- 5 C- 5 C-

YE

AR

1 (

1962

-63)

Gra

de 8

Har

din

juni

or H

igh

Scho

olH

ardt

h, M

ont.

(17)

Stud

ent T

otal

N 1

7

*D -

Dro

pout

P -

Pers

iste

rG

- G

radu

ate

2 (1

963-

64)

3 (1

964-

65)

Flan

drea

u In

d. S

ch.

Flan

drea

u, S

. Dak

.(1

)

Har

din

H S

Har

din,

Mon

t.(1

3)

St. L

abre

Mis

sion

H S

Ash

land

, Mon

t.(1

)

15

c:

4 (1

965-

66)

5 (1

966-

67)

*DP

G

Flan

drea

u In

d.Fl

andr

eau

Ind.

(1)

(1)

,Har

din

H S

(13)

> S

t. L

abre

H S

> F

land

reau

Ind

. 11

Chi

locc

o In

d. S

ch.

Chi

locc

o, O

kla.

Chi

locc

o In

d.(2

)2

2

Har

dth

H S

(9)

Lod

ge G

rass

H S

Lod

ge G

rass

, Mon

t.(1

)

>St

. Lab

re H

S

Har

din

H S

16

) L

odge

Gra

ss li

S-

22

> S

t. ',f

ibre

H S

(1)

(1)

-1

1

1514

FIG

. 15

(Har

din)

Mov

emen

t of

Indi

an S

tude

nts

Thr

ough

Sch

ools

, Nov

. 196

2 -

June

196

7

t.-

(3)

(10)

13

o4.

4, i"

'w

_

57


POPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN HARDIN JUNIOR


Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 196E-66 19'36-67

Grade 8TOTAL

.iex Total N N % N % N % N % N % N %

Male 11 2 18.2 0 0.0 1 11.1 1 12.5 0 0.0 4 36.4

Female 6 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0

Total 17 2 11.8 0 0.0 1 6.7 1 7.1 0 0.0 4 23.5

58


IN HARDIN JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, MONTANA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8

N % N % N % N % N %

Dropout 2 80.0 0 0.0 1 79.0 1 90.0 0 0.0

. iPersister 15 92.9 15 86.1 14 92.2 13 93.2 13 90.8

TABLE 48. AVERAGE ANNUAL GRADES TRANSLATED TO LETTER GRADINGS TO JUNE, 1967, FROM iA TARGET POPULATION OF 17 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS,ENROLLED IN HARDIN JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, MONTANA


0,Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67

N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr,

Dropout 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 1 C 1 D- 0 N. A.

Persister 15 C- 15 C- 13 D+ 12 C+ 13 C+

YE

AR

1 (

1962

-63)

Gra

de 8

Hav

re J

unio

rH

igh

Scho

olH

avre

, Mon

t.(2

4)

2 (1

963-

64)

Box

Eld

er E

lem

.B

ox E

lder

H S

ox E

lder

, Mon

t.B

ox E

lder

, Mon

t,B

ox E

lder

H S

)Box

Eld

ee H

SB

ox E

lder

II

S

(1N

(5)

(7)

(a)

-3

47

3 (1

964-

65)

4 (1

965-

66)

5 (1

966-

67)

*DP

(3T

....

......

......

Cal

ifor

nia

(1)

..---

---'"

---

Stat

e In

dst.

Sch.

Mile

s C

ity, M

ont.

Stat

e In

dst.

(1)

(1)

Stud

ent T

otal

N 2

4

*D -

Dro

pout

P -

Pers

iste

rG

- G

radu

ate

< -

Sch

ool N

on-A

ttend

ance

\ Havre

Jr.

Hig

h(8

)

Stat

e In

dst.

Stat

e In

dst.

Stat

e In

dst.

(2)

(1)

(1)

Mou

ntai

n V

iew

Mou

ntai

n V

iew

....

(Cor

rect

iona

l)(1

).

Hel

ena,

Mon

t.(1

)

NsN

,Iff

avre

II S

....-

----

--H

avre

, Mon

t.---

----

----

---*

Hav

re H

S(6

)(5

)

Bus

by I

nd. S

ch.

Bus

by, M

ont.

(1)

21

>B

usby

Ind

. Sch

.(1

)

16

alif

orni

a(1

)

Hav

re H

S(4

)

Cas

per,

Wyo

.(1

)

13

FIG

. 16

(Hav

re)

Mov

emen

t of

Indi

an S

tude

nts

Thr

ough

Sch

ools

, Nov

. 196

2 -

June

196

7

Stat

e In

dst.

-1

-

Hav

re n

s

1

33

(4)

(7)

11

TABLE 49. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN LNDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN HAVRE JUNIOR

HIGH SCHOOL, MONTANA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, ;962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8 TOTAL

Sex Total N N N aic N % N v,c, N % N %

Male 11 1 9. 1 2 20. 0 1 12. 5 1 14. 3 0 0. 0 5 45. 5

Fcmale 13 2 15. 4 2 18. 2 3 33. 3 1 16. 7 0 0. 0 8 61. 5

Total 24 3 12. 5 4 19. 1 4 23. 5 2 15. 4 0 0. 0 13 54. 2.

61

TABLE 50. AVERAGE ANNUAL ATTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DROPOUTS AND

PERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 24 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED

IN HAVRE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, MONTANA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67

Grade 8

.c, %orfo

axN % N v N N N

Dropout 3 65.3 3 57.7 3 57.0 2 74.5 0 0.0

Persister 21 80.2 11 86.5 9 93.4 10 83.4 71 92.5


A TARGET POPULATION OF 24 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS,

ENROLLED IN HAVRE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, MONTANA


Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67

Grade 8


Dropout 1 D D 2 C+ 0 N. A. 0 N. A.

Persister 10 C- 12 C- 9 C+ 8 C+ 11 C-

")r

YE

AR

1 (

1962

-63)

Gra

de 8

Hay

s E

lem

. Sch

.H

ays,

Mon

t.(1

8)

2 (1

963-

64)

Chi

locc

o In

d. S

ch.

3 (1

964-

65)

Ft. S

ill I

nd. S

ch.

Law

ton,

Okl

a.(1

)

4 (1

965-

6(i)

tD

6 (1

966-

67)

*DP

G

Chi

locc

o, O

kla.

"--

.....

.Chi

locc

o In

d. S

ch.

(1)

Chi

locc

o hi

d. S

ch.

----

->C

hilo

cco

Ind.

Sch

.,-

---

(2)

(3)

-1

12

----

----

----

--C

onch

o D

emo.

Sch

...-

----

---

Con

cho,

Okl

a(1

)(1

)..-

----

----

----

.

St. P

aul's

Ind

.l<

Scho

olSt

. Pau

l's I

nd.

____

_,, S

t, Pa

ul's

Ind

,St

. Pau

l's I

nd.

Mar

ty, S

. Dak

.(1

(1)

14-

1-

1(1

)

1<

(1)

Flan

drea

u In

d. S

ch.

Flan

drea

u, S

. Dak

.Fl

andr

eau

Ind.

Sch

.Fl

andr

cau

Ind.

Sch

.(7

Che

yenn

e-A

rapa

hoIn

dian

Sch

ool

Con

cho,

Okl

a.(1

)

Stud

ent T

otal

N 1

8

*D -

Dro

pout

P -

Pers

iste

rG

- G

radu

ate

(9)

Chi

nook

H S

Chi

nook

, Mon

t.(1

)

13

Inst

. Am

. Ind

. Art

sSa

nte

Fe, N

ew M

ex.

(1)

>C

hino

ok I

I S

(1)

15

(8)

>In

st. A

m. I

nd. A

rts

(1)

>C

'Ain

ook

H S

(1)

13

< -

Sch

ool N

on-A

ttend

ance

FIG

. 17

(Hay

s) M

ovem

ent o

f In

dian

Stu

dent

s T

hrou

gh S

choo

ls,

Nov

. 196

2 -

June

196

7

Ilnl

oH

SH

arle

m, M

ont. 1

1

--->

Fla

ndre

au I

nd. S

ch.

24

4

Chi

nook

-1

1

(2)

(2)

(7)

9

, 63

TABLE 52. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ElcROLLED IN HAYS ELEMENTARY


Year 1962-63 1963-64 1S64-65 1965-66 1966-67

Grade 8 TOTAL


,Male 8 1 12. 5 0 0. 0 2 28.6 1 20. 0 1 25. 0 5 62. 5

Female 10 1 10. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 2 22. 2 1 14.3 4 40. 0

Total 18 2 11. 1 0 0. 0 2 12. 5 3 21. 4 2 18. 2 9 50. 0 4.. A

-

64


IN HAYS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, MONTANA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8

N % N % N % N % N %

Dropout 2 93.5 0 0.0 9 49.5 3 81.3 2 33.5

Persister 16 88.3 12 95.5 13 98.7 10 94.8 8 94.3


ENROLLED IN HAYS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, MONTANAIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

-Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67

Grade 8

Dropout

Persister


2 C- 0 N. A. 1

15 C- 10 C+ 13

D- 1 C 1 nL.

C 10 C+ 9 C-E

YE

AR

1 (

1962

-63)

Gra

de 8

Lod

ge G

rass

Ele

m.

Lod

ge G

rass

, Mon

t.(2

4)

Stud

ent T

otal

N 2

4

*D -

Dro

pout

P -

Pers

iste

rG

- G

radu

ate

(196

3-64

)3

(196

4-65

)

St. L

abre

Mis

sion

H S

St. L

abre

H S

Ash

land

, Mon

t.(2

)

(1)

Flan

drea

u In

d. S

ch.

Flan

drea

u, S

. Dak

.(3

)

4(19

65-r

.6)

5 (1

966-

67)

PG

hnm

ac. C

onee

p.--

-''St

epha

n, 3

. Dak

.--

> I

mna

c. C

onee

p.

3. S

t. L

nbre

II

SL

ahre

II

S -

Flan

drea

u In

cL(4

)

>L

odge

Gra

ss H

SY

r.oc

lge

Gra

ss H

S(1

7)(1

4)

Flan

drea

u(2

)

> L

odge

Gra

ss I

I S

(9)

-->

Flan

drea

u1

1 2

> L

odge

Gra

ss n

s9

I 0

Inst

. of

Am

. Ind

. Art

sSa

nte

Fe, N

ew M

ex.

> I

nst.

Am

. ind

.H

ardi

n H

S(1

)1

1

Har

din,

Mon

t.(1

)M

ount

ain

Vie

w S

ell.

Hel

ena.

Mon

t.(1

)

Hol

y R

osar

y M

issi

onH

SH

oly

Ros

ary

H S

Chi

locc

o In

d. S

ch.

Chi

locc

o, O

kla.

Chi

loec

o In

d.(1

)(2

)

Pine

Rid

ge, S

. Dak

.(1

)

2322

>H

oly

Ros

ary

H S

----

> C

hilo

cco

Ind.

11

>H

oly

Rrm

ary

2

20(1

)ro

ig

FIG

. 18

(Lod

ge G

rass

) M

ovem

ent o

f In

dian

Stu

dent

s T

hrou

gh S

choo

ls, N

ov. 1

962

-Ju

ne 1

967

Cr)

66

TABLE 55. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDEN1S ENROLLED IN LODGE GRASS

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, MONTANA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8 TOTAL

Sex Total N N N % N c7g N air N cr/c. N CI

A

Male 10 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0

Female 14 1 7. 1 1 7. 7 2 16. 7 1 10. 0 1 11. 1 6 42. 9

Total 24 1 4. 2 1 4. 4 2 9. 1 1 5. 0 1 5. 3 6 25. 0

67



IN LODGE GRASS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, MONTANA IN GRADE EiGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63Grade 8

1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67

N % N % N % N % N %

Dropout 1 88.0 1 96.0 2 62.0 2 74.5 1 8.0

Persister 92 81.4 22 80.6 20 91.2 18 94.2 17 95.9



ENROLLED IN LODGE GRASS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, MONTANAIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67

Grade 8


Dropout 1 C 1 D+ 2 D 2 D+ 0 N. A.

Persister 14 D+ 17 C- 19 C- 17 C- 16

YE

AR

1 (

1962

-63)

2 (1

963-

64)

Gra

de 8

Popl

ar J

r. H

SPo

plar

, Mon

t.(3

9)

3 (1

964-

65)

Prov

o, U

tah

Prov

o, U

tah

(1)

(1)

1<

Popl

ar H

S(3

4)

Stud

ent T

otal

N 3

935

*D -

Dro

pout

P -

Pers

iste

rG

- G

radu

ate

< -

Sch

ool N

on-A

ttend

ance

Popl

ar H

S(3

2)

C)

CO

4 (1

965-

66)

5 (1

966-

67)

----

>Pr

ovo,

Uta

h(1

)

Flan

drea

u th

d. S

ch.

Flan

drea

u, S

. Dal

t.(1

)

Mou

ntai

n V

iew

HS

-1H

elen

a, M

ont.-

-*,M

ount

ain

Vie

w(1

)(1

)

Will

isto

n H

SW

illis

ton,

N. D

ak.

(1)

Uta

h St

. Ind

st. S

ch.

Ogd

en, U

tah

----

->U

tah

St. I

ndst

. Sch

.(1

)(1

)

35

Popl

ar H

S

PG

>Pr

ovo,

Uta

h1

Coo

k C

hr. T

rng.

Sch

.Ph

oeni

x, A

rizo

na1

--->

Popl

ar I

I S

1

(23)

3-

1515

Ari

zona (1

)

Ron

an H

SR

onan

, Mon

t.(2

)

G. E

. D.

Mar

ines

1

Wilb

ston

H S

>R

onan

11

S

1

1

29(3

1(2

)(1

8)20

FIG

. 19

(Pop

lar)

Mov

emen

t of

Indi

an T

a.cd

ents

Thr

ough

Sch

ools

, Nov

. 196

2 -

Juno

196

7

elo.

t00'

r

2 ,

,I1

.7.,

niV

.V"C

P..7

"

.A

l

-1111111=Mil.Z./.1111.1.....

69

TABLE 58. PROGRESSI VE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGE° TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGET

POPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN POPLAR JUWOR


Year 196263 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67

Grade 8TOTAL

Sex Total N N % N % N % N % N % N

Male 22 1 4.6 0 0.0 3 14.3 2 11.1 2 12.5 8 36.4

Female 17 2 11.8 1 6.7 3 21.4 4 36.4 1 14.3 11 64.7

Total 3 3 7.7 1., 2.8 6 17.1 6 20.7 3 13.0 19 48.7

.,-,-

70

TABLE 59. AVERAGE ANNUAL ATTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO jUNE, 1967, OF DROPOUTS ANDPERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 39 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED

iN POPLAR JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, MONTANA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 162

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8

N a0 N % N % N % N %

Dropout 3 79.7 1 98.0 5 74.6 6 80.8 3 79.3

Persister 36 95.9 34 93.4 30 89.1 24 92.0 20 92.0


ENROLLED IN POPLAR JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, MONTANAIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-6:: 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8


Dropout 1 D 0 N. A. 3 D 2 C-1- 1 D

Persister 35 C-1- 32 C- 27 C- 23 C- 19 C-

YE

AR

1 (

1962

-63)

2 (1

963-

64)

3 (1

964-

65)

4 (1

96E

-66)

5 (1

966-

67)

Gra

de 8

*DP

GT

Pier

re I

nd. S

ch.

/Pie

rre,

S. D

ak.

(1)

/St

ate

Inds

t. Sc

h.M

iles

City

, Mon

t.(1

)

Flan

drea

u In

d. S

ch.

Flan

drea

u, S

. Dak

.(1

)

Ron

an E

lem

enta

rySc

hool

---)

Ron

an H

S>

Ron

an H

SR

onan

, Mon

t.(8

)(8

)(1

1)

Stud

ent T

otal

N 1

1

*D -

Dro

pout

P -

Pers

iste

rG

- G

radu

ate

Hel

lgat

e H

SM

isso

ula,

Mon

t.(1

)

----

-->

Fla

ndre

au I

nd. S

ch.

(1)

Stat

e ln

dst.

Sch.

1-

1

----

> R

onan

H S

Ron

an I

! S

(8)

88

>H

ellg

ate

H S

>H

ellg

ate

H S

> H

ellg

ate

II S

(1)

(1')

-1

1

1010

10(1

)(9

)10

FIG

. 20

(Ron

an)

Mov

emen

t of

Indi

an S

tude

nts

Thr

ough

Sch

ools

, Nov

. 196

2 -

June

196

7

72

TABLE 61. PROGi,ESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 196, , FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN RONAN ELEMENTARY


Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8 TOTAL

Sex Total N N ofiv N % N % N c9,0 N % N %

Male 7 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. A 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0

Female 4 1 25. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 1 25. 0

Total H 1 9.1 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 1 9. 1

7 3

TABLE 62. AVERAGE. A NNLJA L ATTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DROPOUTS ANDPERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 11 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED

IN RONAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, MONTANA IN GRADE FIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 196.J-66 1966-67Grade 8

Dropout

Persister

10

1 90.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0

10 90.5 10 93.6 10 93.5 9 92.6

0 0.0

10 93.7


;1

ia

4 _

. A TARGET POPULATION OF 11 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS ANT PERSISTERS,ENROLLED IN RONAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, MONTANA


, Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8

iiv. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr.

Dropout 1 C 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 0 N. A.

Persis ter 9 B- 10 C- 10 C- 9 C- 9 C-

YE

AR

1 (

1962

-63)

Gra

de 8

St. I

gnat

ius

Ele

men

tzry

St. I

gnat

ius,

Mon

t.(9

)

2 (1

963-

64)

3 (1

964-

65)

Flan

drca

u In

d. S

ch.

S. D

ak.

Flan

drea

u(2

)

St. I

gnat

ius

H S

-> S

t. Ig

natiu

s H

S(4

)(3

)

Chi

locc

o In

d. S

ch.

Chi

locc

o, O

kla.

(1)

Bus

by I

nd. S

ch.

Bus

by I

nd. S

ch.

Bus

by, M

ont.

(1)

(1)

Stud

ent T

otal

N 9

7'7

*D -

Dro

pout

PPe

rsis

ter

GG

radu

ate

4 (1

965-

66)

5 (1

966-

67)

*DP

Flan

drea

u th

d.(3

)

St. I

gnat

ius

HSZ

_(2

)

Flan

drea

u th

d.1

11

23

St. I

gnat

ius

H S

1

-->

Chi

locc

o In

d.>

Chi

kcco

Ind

.(1

)1

Bus

by I

nd. S

ch.

> B

usby

Ind

. Sch

.(1

)

FIG

. 21

(St.

Igna

tius)

Mov

emen

t of

Indi

an S

tude

nts

Thr

ough

Sch

ools

,N

ov. 1

902

- Ju

ne 1

967

16.

.

1

-1

1

(2)

(1)

(4)

5

75

TABLE 64. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE. 1967, FROM A TARGETPOP LJI

ELEMTIONOF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN ST. IGNATIUS

ENTARY SCHOOL, MONTANA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63Grade 8

1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67TOTAL

SexI,

Total N N N N crit N c.c N % N

Male 5 9 40.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 33.3 3

Female 4 0 0.0 0 0.0 n%, 0.0 0 0.0 1 25.0 1

Total 9 9 99.9 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 9 28.6 4

cic

60.0

25.0 144.4

It

7 6

TABLE 65. AVERAGE ANNUAL ATTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DROPOUTS ANDPERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 9 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENaOLLED

IN ST. IGNATIUS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, MONTANA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67

Grade 8

Dropout

Persister

N a4 N c.;,/ N % N Nic %

9 86.5 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0. 0 9 43.5

7 96.3 7 96.6 6 95.3 7 91.7 4 96.8


A TARGET POPULATION OF 9 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS,ENROLLED IN ST. IGNATIUS ELFMENTARY SCHOOL, MONTANA


Dropout

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67

Grade 8

N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. G.

0 N. A. 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 1 D-

Persister 7 C- 6 C- 6 C- 7 C+ 4 B-

"i

i

I

-

YE

AR

1 (

1962

-63)

Gra

de 8

St. P

au P

s M

issi

onH

ays,

Mon

t.(1

2)

2 (1

963-

64)

Che

yenn

e-A

rapa

ho I

nd.

Con

cho,

Okl

a.(1

)

Flan

drea

u In

d. S

ch.

Flan

d re

au, S

. Dak

.(5

)

.'*".

.....,

Jodd

Co.

II

SIv

Iiss

ion,

S. D

ak.

(3)

3 (1

964-

65)

4 (1

965-

66)

Dod

son

H S

Dod

son,

Mon

t.->

Dod

son

H S

(1)

(1)

>Fl

andr

eau

Ind.

(7)

St. P

aul's

Mis

sion

(2)

Stud

ent T

otal

N 1

211

*D -

Dro

pout

PPe

rsis

ter

G -

Gra

duat

e

5 (1

966-

67)

*DP

G

--->

Fla

ndre

au I

nd,

Flan

clre

au I

nd.

(4)

Tod

d C

o. H

ST

odd

Co.

H

Chi

locc

o In

d. S

ch.

Chi

locc

o, O

kla.

i(2)

Coi

leho

Dem

o. S

ch.

Con

eho,

Okl

a.(1

)

11

(4)

-->

Chi

locc

o In

d.(2

)

13

Har

lem

II

SH

arle

m, M

ont.

----

4To&

In

s 3

Chi

loce

o In

d.2

2

11(1

)(9

)9

FIG

. 22

(St.

Paul

's M

issi

on)

Mov

emen

t of

Indi

an S

tude

nts

Thr

ough

Sch

ools

, Nov

. 196

2 -

June

196

7

..'Ir

4.-Y

r4' e

IN}4

^,Y

r .1

` i J

A. '

,I. r

,'r,i

rror

rr ',

Air

eIt

errr

r:rr

rl r

,4,

1r,

rvr

a ri

rr.,-

,vr

1.5r

f rr

,I.

,r,

..yst

...,..

II,

. .. .

..,

0 1

hI 0

, ,,,.

...,

11. W

... 0

h11

VW

' ,w

,.. ..

, ..1

4,5.

0.1.

10 A

+1.

44

78

TABLE 67. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN ST. PAUL'S MISSION


Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8 TOTAL

Sex Total N N % N % N % N '7,0 N % N %

Male 6 1 16.7 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 20.0 2 33.3

Female 6 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 16.7 0 0.0 1 16.7

Total 12 1 8.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 9.1 1 10.0 3 25.0

-

7 9


IN ST. PAUL'S MISSION SCHOOL, MONTANA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67

Grade 8

Dropout

Persister

N % N % N % N % N %

1 81.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 84.0

11 88.6 10 96.1 10 98 4 10 98.5 9 97.2



ENROLLED IN ST. PAUL'S MISSION SCHOOL, MONTANA


Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67

Grade 8

Dropout


1 D 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 1 D+

Persister 11 B-L 9 C+ 7 C 9 C+ 8 C+

80

TABLE 70. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS TO JUNE, 1967, FROMA SAMPLE OF 50.1 OF MONTANA SCHOOLS ENROLLING TEN OR MORE INDIAN STUDENTS

IN GRADE EIGHT AS OF NOVEMBER, 1962

year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8 TOTAL

Sex Total N N % N % N q.0 N % N % N ,7.0

Male 132 13 9.9 6 5.0 13 11.5 8 8.0 9 9.8 49 37.1

Female 127 14 11.0 9 8.0 17 16.4 12 13.8 7 9.3 5:1 46.5

Total 259 27 10.4 15 6.5 30 13.8 20 10.7 16 9.6 108 41.7

YE

AR

1 (

1962

-63)

Gra

de 8

Ft. T

otte

n E

lem

.Ft

. Tot

ten,

N. D

ak.

(10)

2 (1

963-

64)

3 (1

964-

65)

Flan

drea

u In

d. S

ch.

Flan

drea

u, S

. Dak

.(1

)

Mad

dock

H S

Mad

dock

, N. D

ak.

(5)

Dev

il's

Lak

e E

lLi.

Dev

il's

Lak

e, N

. Dak

.(1

)

Stud

ent T

otal

N 1

010

*D -

Dro

pout

P -

Pers

iste

rG

- G

radu

ate

40be

ron

H S

\Obe

ron,

N. D

ak.

(1)

Ft. Y

ates

H S

Ft. Y

ates

, N. D

ak.

(1)

)Fla

ndre

au I

nd.

(1)

Imln

ac. C

once

p.St

epha

n, S

. Dak

.(1

)

H S

t"I

A(7

)\

Dev

il's

Lak

e H

SD

eviP

s L

ake,

N. D

ak.

(1)

4 (1

965-

66)

5 (1

966-

67)

*DP

G

->Im

mac

. Con

cep.

)Im

mac

. Con

cep.

(1)

Mad

dock

H S

(5)

Obe

ron

HO

bero

n H

S(2

)(2

)

1 Mad

dock

H S

-4

4

Obe

ron

H S

1

98

(2)

-(4

)4

FIG

. 23

(Ft.

Tot

ten)

Mov

emen

t of

Indi

an S

tude

nts

Thr

uugh

Sch

ools

, Nov

. 196

2 -

Jnne

196

7

82

TABLE 71. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO %TUNE, 1567, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDEN'TS ENROLLED IN F7. TOTTEN ELEMENTARY

SCHOOL, NORTH DAKOTA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEN!BER, 1962

Year 1962-63Grade 8

1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-07TOTAL

Sex Total N N q,c N % N % N % N %

Male 3 0 0.0 1 33.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 50.0 2 66.7

Female 7 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 14.3 2 33.3 1 25.0 4 57.1

Total 10 0 0.0 1 10.0 1 11.1 2 25.0 2 33.3 6 60.0

83

TABLE 72. AVERAGE ANNUAL ATTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, 01. DROPOUTS ANDPERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 10 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED

IN FT. TOTTEN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, NORTH DAKOTAIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67

Grade 8

N % N % N G74- N % N %

Dropout 0 0.0 1 27.0 1 10.0 2 35.0 9 91.5

Persister 10 94.8 9 79. 9 8 87.8 6 93.2 4 93.8


ENROLLED IN FT. TOTTEN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, NORTH DAKOTAIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67

Grade 8


Dropout 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 1 B

Persister 10 C+ 3 C- 6 C- 6 C- 1 C-

YE

AR

1 (

1962

-63)

Gra

de 8

Ft. Y

ates

Ele

men

tary

Ft. Y

ates

, N. D

ak.

(37)

2 (1

963-

64)

Plan

kint

on H

Sla

nkin

ton,

S. D

ak.

(1)

3 (1

964-

65)

4 (1

965-

66)

St. P

aul's

Ind

, Sch

.St

. Pau

l's I

nd.

/Mar

ty,

S. D

ak.

(1)

(I)

McI

ntos

h H

S

77M

cInt

osh,

S. D

ak.

(1)

Ft. Y

ates

H S

...-2

/Ft.

Yat

es, N

. Dak

.(2

7),_

----

----

"---

----

-4

Stud

ent T

otal

N 3

7

*D -

Dro

pout

P -

Pers

iste

rG

- G

radu

ate

< -

Sch

ool N

on-A

ttend

ance

Flan

drea

u In

d. S

ch.

Flan

drca

u, S

. Dak

.(2

)

Che

yenn

e-E

agle

But

teE

agle

But

te, S

. Dak

.(1

)

<Ft

. Yat

es H

S(2

1)

>Fl

andr

eau

hid.

Sch

.(2

)

._._

_.).

> F

t. Y

ates

H S

(19)

5 (1

966-

67)

*D?

c;T

-->

St.

PauP

s In

d.-

-1

1

4 Ft

. Yat

es H

S2

114

15

> F

land

reau

Ind

. Sch

.Fl

andr

eau

Ind.

Sch

.(2

)

Har

lem

H S

Har

lew

S--

>H

arle

in I

I S

Har

lem

, Mon

t.(1

)(1

)(1

)

Mob

ridg

e H

SM

obri

dge,

S. D

ak.

(1)

32

>M

obri

dge

H S

) M

obri

dge

II S

_1

> M

obri

dge

H S

1

(1)

(1)

--

11

2824

FIG

. 24

(Ft.

Yat

es)

Mov

emen

t of

Indi

an S

tude

nts

Thr

ough

Sch

ools

, Nov

. 196

2 -

June

193

7

(2)

(1)

(11)

18

85

TABLE 74. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN FT. YATES ELEMENTARY

SCHOOL, NORTH DAKOTA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63Grade

1963-64 1964-65 1965-66

Sex Total N N (:i N .`:'

Male

Female

Total

17

20

37

3

1

4

17.7

5.0

10.8

3

1

4

21.4

5.3

12.1

2

g.,

5

18 2

16.7

17.2

1

,).,

4

11.1

20.0

16.7

1966-67TOTAL

N C74L N %

1 12.5 10 58.8

1 8.3 9 45.0

2 10.0 19 51.4

86


IN FT. YATES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, NORTH DAKOTAIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8

N % N % N % N % N %

Dropout 4 58.0 4 86.8 5 54.0 4 23.5 2 58.0

Persister 33 83.9 26 85.6 23 93.3 20 92.4 18 89.9

TABLE 76. AVERAGE ANNUAL GRADES TRANSLATED TO LE TTER GRADINGS TO JUNE , 1967, FROMA TARGET POPULATION OF 37 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS,

ENROLLED IN FT. YATES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, NORTH DAKOTAIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8

Dropout

Persister

N A 11. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr.

4 D 4 D 4 Df 2 D+ 2 C+

33 C- 28 C- 23 C- 20 C+ 17 C+

-1,

1

I

1

YE

AR

1 (

1962

-63)

Gra

de 8

2 (1

963-

64)

_,,,-

--

Man

dare

e H

SM

anda

ree

H S

.--

>M

anda

ree

H S

c--

>M

anda

ree

H S

----

> M

anda

ree

H S

3 (1

964-

65)

Flan

drea

u In

d. S

ch.

Flan

drea

u, N

. Dak

.(1

)

4 (1

965-

66)

--).

Fla

ndrc

au I

nd.

(1)

5 (1

966-

67)

*DP

GT

rlan

drea

u hi

d.-

-1

Man

dare

e, N

. Dak

.(1

0)(1

0)(9

)(6

)

Ber

ea F

ound

. Sch

.B

erea

, Ken

tuck

y(1

)

Stud

ent T

otal

N 1

010

108

*D -

Dro

pout

P -

Pers

!ste

rG

- G

radu

ate

FIG

. 25

(Man

dare

e) M

ovem

ent o

f In

dian

Stu

dent

s T

hrou

gh S

choo

ls, N

ov. 1

962

- Ju

ne 1

967

1

1-

33

Yat

es I

I S

Ft. Y

ates

, N. D

ak.

-1

-

Ber

ea F

ound

. Sch

.-

1

1 1

(1)

(1)

(5)

13

88

TABLE 77. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMFRICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLFD IN MANDAREE HIGH


Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8 TOTAL

Sex Total N N c,A N N qc N clx N e-k N %

Male 4 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0

Female 6 G 0.0 0 0.0 2 33.3 1 25.0 1 33.3 4 66.7

Total 10 0 0.0 0 O. 0 9 20.0 1 12.5 1 14.3 4 40.0

-

89

TABLE 78. AVERAGE ANNUAL A TTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DROPOUTS ANDPERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 10 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED

IN MANDAREE HIGH SCHOOL, NORTH DAKOTA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1362

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8

N N c7.-c N ci,c N (7( N (-

A

Dropout 0 0.0 0 0. (I 2 83.0 1 100.0 1 44.0

Persister 9 89.7 10 ES. 2 8 91.3 7 84.6 6 89.9

TABLE 79. AVERAGE ANNUA L GRADES TRANSLATED TO LETTER GRADINGS TO JUNE, 1967, FROMA TARGET POPULATION OF 10 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS,

ENROLLED IN MANDAREE HIGH SCHOOL, NORTH DAKOTAIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8


Dropout 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 1 C-

Persister 9 C, 10 C- 8 C- 7 C- 6 C

,..

'

f:t.1

*

YE

AR

1 (

1962

-63)

Gra

de 8

New

Tow

n E

lem

. Sch

.N

ew T

own,

N. D

ak.

(12)

Stud

ent T

otal

N 1

2

*D -

Dro

pout

P -

P er

sis

ter

G -

Gra

duat

e

2 (1

963-

64)

3 (1

964-

65)

4 (1

965-

66)

Man

dare

e H

S--

-- M

anda

ree

H S

> M

anda

ree

11 S

/Man

dare

e, N

. Dak

.(1

)(1

)(1

)

Flan

drea

u In

d. S

ch.

-->

rla

ndre

au

iland

reau

,

N. D

ak.

(2)

(2)

10

New

Tow

n H

S(4

)

-->

Plan

drea

u In

d.(1

)

Ogl

ala

Com

m. S

ch.

Pine

Rid

ge, S

. Dak

.(1

) 8

Cal

ifor

nia

(1)

5 (1

966-

67!

*DP

AFl

ardr

eau

thd.

Whi

te S

hiel

d H

SR

oseg

len,

N. D

alt.

1

> N

ew T

own

Fl S

-->

New

Tow

n II

S(3

)1

11

2

> O

glal

a C

omm

.(1

) 7

FIG

. 26

(New

Tow

n) M

ovem

ent o

f In

dian

Stu

dent

s T

hrou

gh S

choo

ls, N

ov. 1

962

- Ju

ne 1

967

.,;,*

#1

7

11

(2)

(2)

(2)

4

91

TABLE 80. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN NEW TOWN ELEMENTARY


Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8 TOTAL

Sex Toial N N % N % N % N % N % N %

Male 4 1 25. 0 1 33.3 0 0. 0 0 O. 0 1 50. 0 3 75. 0

Female 8 I 12. 5 1 14. 3 1 16. 7 1 20. 0 1 25. 0 5 62. 5

Total 12 2 16. 7 2 20. 0 1 12. 5 1 14. 3 2 33. 3 8 66. 7

92


1

IN NEW TOWN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, NORTH DAKOTAIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8

N % N % N % ... N q,c N % is

Dropout 2 86.5 2 93.0 1 72.0 1 11.0 2 70.0

Persister 10 90.1 8 93.9 7 94: 1 5 90.0 4 92.3

TABLE 82 . AVERAGE ANNUAL GRADES TRANSLATED TO LETTER GRADINGS TO JUNE, 1967, FROMA TARGET POPULATION OF 12 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS,

ENROLLED IN NEW TOWN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, NORTH DAKOTAIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8

N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr.

Dropout 1 D- 2 D-

Persister 7 D- 8 C-

N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr.

C0 N. A. 0 N. A. 1

7 C- 4 C- 4 C

r.00

,0, I

N.s

'i0s1

.1^.

.s...

1ss,

1is

,.' '

''

YE

AR

1 (

1962

-63)

Gra

de 8

St. A

nn's

Mis

sion

Sch

.B

elco

urt,

N. D

ak.

(30)

Stud

ent T

otal

N 3

0

* D

- D

ropo

utP

- Pe

rsis

ter

G -

Gra

duat

e

2 (1

963-

64)

Ass

umpt

ion

Abb

eyH

SR

icna

rdto

n, N

. Dak

.(1

)

Imm

a.iu

late

Con

cep.

H S

teph

an, S

. Dak

.(1

)

Flan

drea

u M

d. S

cth.

Flan

drea

u, S

. Dak

.(2

)

2<

Bel

cour

t H S

)B

elco

urt,

N. D

aklI

nlyr

t H S

Bel

cour

t H S

---4

Bel

cour

t H S

)Bel

cour

t H S

eol

< -

Sch

ool N

on-A

ttend

ance

3 (1

964-

65)

4 (1

965-

Cr4

Ass

ump.

Abb

ey>

Ass

ump.

Abb

ey(1

)

.---

-->

Imm

ac. C

once

p(1

)

Flan

drea

u th

d.(2

)

(1)

5 (1

966-

67)

PG

Ass

ump.

Abb

ey

>Im

mac

. Con

cep.

>hn

rnac

. Con

cep.

(1)

Flan

drea

u M

d.(2

)

Tex

as(1

)

1

Flan

drea

u In

d.1

(20)

(1)

(17)

Cal

ifor

nia,

(1)

Not

re D

ame

Aca

dem

yW

illow

City

, N. D

ak.

(1)

>N

otre

Dam

e(3

)

2624

(16)

1 1 1

12

1012

Ron

a H

SR

olla

, N. D

ak.-

-R

olla

H S

(1)

22(1

)(3

)(1

3)16

FIG

. 27

(St.

Ann

's M

issi

on)

Mov

emen

t of

Indi

an S

tude

nts

Thr

ough

Sch

ools

, Nov

. 196

2 -

June

196

7C

Z)

CA

D

OP

94

TABLE 83. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENIS ENROLLED IN ST. ANN'S IPCSSION


Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8 TOTAL


Male 13 2 15. 4 3 27. 3 0 0. 0 3 37. 5 0 0. 0 8 61. 5

Female 17 0 0. 0 1 5. 9 2 12. 5 2 14. 3 1 8. 3 6 35. 3

r)

Total 30 2 6. 7 4 14. 3 2 8. 3 5 22. 7 1 5. 9 14 46. 7

.

95

TABLE 84. AVERAGE ANNUAL A TTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DROPOUTS AND


IN ST. ANN'S MISSION SCHOOL, NORTH DAKOTA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67

Grade 8

N % N % N % N % N %

Dropout 2 51.5 4 57.8 1 76.0 4 74.0 0 0.0

Persister 26 90.9 22 92.1 21 95.0 16 91.8 16 91.3

TABLE 85. AVERAGE ANNUA L GRADES TRANSLATED TO LETTER GRADINGS TO JUNE, 1967, FROM

A TARGET POPULATION OF 30 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENIS, DROI OUTS AND PERSISTERS,

ENROLLED IN ST. ANN'S MISSION SCHOOL, NORTH DAKOTA


Yeai 1962-63Grade 8

1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67


Dropout 2 D- 0 N. A. .1 D 4 D+ 1 D+

Persister 22 B- 17 C- 17 C+ 16 C- 16 C+

96

TABLE 86. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE OF AMLkICAN INDIAN STUDENTS TO JUNE, 1967, FROMA SAMPLE OF 50% OF NORTH DAKOTA SCHOOLS ENROLLING TEN OR MORE INDIAN

STUDENTS IN GRADE EIGHT AS OF NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63Grade 8

1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67'1",".i ....1

-- .7. v1 ra. :..

Sex

Mae

Female

lbtal

Total N

41

58

99

N

6

2

8

a,0

14.6

3.5

8.1

N

8

3

11

a,0

22.9

5.4

12.1

N

2

9

11

%

7.4

17.0

13.8

N

4

9

13

r7/0

16.0

20.5

18.8

N

3

5

8

%.

14.3

14.3

14.3

N

23

28

51

in

56.1

48.3

51.5

YE

AR

1 (

1962

-63)

Gra

de 8

He

Dog

Sch

ool

Mis

sion

, S. D

ak.

(12)

2 (1

963-

64)

St. F

ranc

Is

H S

7St. F

ranc

iri,

S. D

ak.

(3)

3 (1

964-

65)

St. F

ranc

is H

S(3

)

yTod

d C

ount

y Sc

h.>

Tod

d C

ount

y Sc

h.M

issi

on, S

. Dak

.(1

)

(6)

Stud

ent T

otal

N 1

29

*D -

Dro

pout

P -

Pers

iste

rG

- G

radu

ate

Ogl

a la

Com

m. S

ch.

Pine

Rid

ge, S

. Dak

.(1

) 5

4 (1

965-

6(t)

St. F

raic

ts H

S(1

) 1

FIG

. 28

(He

Dog

) M

ovem

ent o

f In

dian

Stu

dent

s T

hrou

ghSc

hool

s, N

ov. 1

962

- Ju

ne 1

967

98

TABLE 87. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENIS ENROLLED IN HE DOG SCHOOL,

SOUTH DAKOTA IN GaADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63Grade 8

1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67TOTAL

Sex Total N N % N % N % N N % N %

Male 2 0 0.0 0 0.0 2 100.0 0 O. 0 0 0.0 2 100.0

Female 10 3 30.0 4 57.1 2 66.7 1 100.0 9 0.0 10 100.0

Total 12 3 25.0 4 44.4 4 80.0 1 100.0 0 0.0 12 100.0

99


IN HE DOG SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67

Grade 8

Dropout

Persister

N % N % N % N % N %

3 81.7 4 81.8 4 76.6 1 94.0 0 0.0

9 92.2 5 91.0 1 96.0 0 0.0 0 0.0

TABLE 89. AVERAGE ANNUAL GRADES TRANSLATED TO LET. 11 GRADINGS TO JUNE, 1967, FROMA TARGET POPULATION OF 12 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS,

ENROLLED IN HE DOG SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTAIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 19e4-65 1965-66 1966-67

Grade 8

N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N A. Gr.

Dropout 2 C+ 1 D 2 C+ 1 B 0 N. A.

Persister 9 B- 5 C 1 B+ 0 N. A. 0 N. A.

YE

AR

1 (

1962

-63)

Gra

de 8

Hol

y R

osar

y M

issi

onPi

ne R

idge

, S. D

ak.

(50)

2 (1

963-

64)

Rap

id C

ity H

SR

apid

City

, S. D

ak.

(1)

/Hot

Spr

ings

H S

AH

ot S

prin

gs, S

. Dak

.(1

)

Che

yenn

e, W

yo.

(1)

Gor

don,

Neb

r.(1

)

>H

oly

Ros

ary

(27)

Ogl

ala

Com

m'4

1111

1111

1411

1111

1011

111S

ch.

Pine

Rid

ge, S

. Dak

.(5

)

3 (1

964-

65)

----

> R

apid

flit

y H

S(3

)

>H

ot S

prin

gs H

S

Pine

Rid

ge P

ub. S

ch.

Pine

Rid

ge, S

. Dak

.(1

)Je

ffer

son

H S

./.Po

rtla

nd, O

re.

(1)

(1)

4 (1

965-

66)

Rap

id C

ity I

I S

(1)

5 (1

966-

67)

*DP

GT

>R

apid

City

n s

-1

1

Hol

y R

osar

yH

oly

Ros

ary

-->

Hol

y R

osar

y

(27)

(25)

3-

1616

Ogl

ala

Com

m(4

)

Stud

ent T

otal

N 5

036

*D -

Dro

pout

P -

Pers

iste

rG

- G

radu

ate

36

Ogl

ala

Com

m.

1I

23

Tod

d C

o. S

ch.

Mis

sion

, S. D

ak.

--

22

33(4

)(1

)(2

1)22

FIG

.29

(Hol

y R

osar

y) M

ovem

ent o

f In

dian

Stu

dent

s T

hrou

ghSc

hool

s, N

ov. 1

962

- Ju

ne 1

967

101


POPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN HOLY ROSARY MISSION

SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTA IN GRA.,E.' ZIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67

Grade 8TOTAL

Sex Total N N % N % N % N % N cvio N %

Male 24 4 16. 7 0 0. 0 2 10. 0 4 22. 2 1 7.1 11 45. 8

Female 26 10 38. 5 0 0. 0 1 6. 3 3 20. 0 3 25. 0 17 65. 4

Total 50 14 28. 0 0 0. 0 3 8. 3 7 21. 2 4 15. 4 28 56. 0

102

TABLE 91. AVERAGE ANNUAL ATTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DROPOUTS ANDPERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 50 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLEDIN HOLY ROSARY MISSION SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65Grade 8

1965-66 1966-67

N cv/0 N % N oiAD N % N %

Dropout ii 73.4 0 0.0 2 89.0 6 67.7 4 94.3

Persister 33 95.3 32 97.2 30 94.6 24 95.8 19 96.3

TABLE 92. AVERAGE ANNUA L GRADES TRANSLATED TO LETTER GRADINGS TO JUNE, 1967, FROMA TARGET POPULATION OF 50 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS,

ENROLLED IN HOLY ROSARY MISSION SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTAIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65Grade 8

W65-66 1966-67


Dropout 9 C+ 0 N. A. 2 D+ 2 D+ 2 D+

Persister 30 C- 22 C- 26 C 17 C+ 20 C+

,r4w

w,=

$vnv

pi,;4

7,T

zw,5

=up

l,wR

igm

ggm

poR

IG=

amiN

mw

,74

1

YE

AR

1 (

1962

-63)

Gra

de 8

Imm

acul

ate

Con

cept

ion

Mis

sion

Sch

ool

----

> I

mm

ac. C

once

p.St

epha

n, S

. Dak

.(1

5)(2

2)

.,

2 (1

963-

64)

3 (1

964-

65)

Ft. T

hom

oson

Ele

m.

Ft. T

hom

pson

, S. D

ak.

(1)

Flan

drea

u In

d. S

ch.

Flan

drea

u, S

. Dak

.(1

)

6.-W

dent

Tol

al N

22

*ID

- D

ropo

utP

Pers

iste

rG

- G

radu

ate

Pier

re I

nd. S

ch.

Pier

re, S

. Dak

.(1

)

Imm

ac. C

once

p.(1

1)

4 (1

965-

66)

5 (1

966-

67)

*DP

G

Flan

drea

u In

d.Fl

andr

eau

Ind.

(1)

11

Gan

n V

alle

y H

SG

ann

Val

ley,

Gan

n V

alle

y H

SS.

Dak

.(1

)(1

)

McI

ntos

h H

SM

cInt

osh,

S. D

ak.

(1)

Pier

re H

SPi

erre

, S. D

ak.

(1)

Tim

ber

Lak

e H

ST

imbe

r L

akes

S. D

ak. -

> T

imbe

r L

ake

H S

(1)

(1)

1715

Mad

dock

H S

Mad

dock

, N. D

ak.

(1)

Gan

n V

alle

y H

S

Imm

ac. C

once

p.>

Im

mac

. Con

cep.

(8)

Cal

ifor

nia

(2)

77

11

Cla

rem

ont H

SC

lare

mon

t, S.

Dak

.1

1

13(1

)(1

)(9

)10

FIG

.30

(Im

mac

ulat

e C

once

ptio

n) M

ovem

ent o

f In

dian

Stu

dent

s T

hrou

gh S

choo

ls, N

ov. 1

962

- Ju

ne 1

967

InI

104

TABLE 93. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN IMMACULATE CONCEPTION

MISSION SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTA IN GRADE EICitil , NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8 TOTAL

Sex Total N N % N % N % N c,/o N % N %

Male 12 b 41. 7 1 14. 3 2 33.3 0 0. 0 1 25. 0 9 75. 0

Female 10 0 0. 0 1 10. 0 0 0. 0 2 22. 2 0 0. 0 3 30. 0

Total 22 5 22. 7 2 11. 8 2 13.3 2 15. 4 1 9. 1 12 54. 6

- - lawO...

105

TABLE 94. AVERAGI: ANNUAL ATTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DROPOUTS ANDPERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 22 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED

IN IMMACULATE CONCEPTION MISSION SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTAIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8

N % N % N % Iv.i., % N %

Dropout 5 90.0 2 60.6 1 37.0 2 54.0 1 69.0

Persister 17 94.1 14 94.3 13 98.5 10 94.0 10 99. C


ENROLLED IN IMMACULATE CONCErTION MISSION SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTAIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

1

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8


Dropout 3 C+ 2 D+ 0 N. A. 2 D+ 0 N. A.

Persister 15 C- 13 C 12 C+ 9 C+ 9 c+

ti

YE

AR

1 (

1962

-63)

Gra

de 8

Litt

le E

agle

Day

Sch

.L

ittle

Eag

le, S

. Dak

.(1

0)

1.10

,^,

fc.1

m%

r øw

AT

V9

0,IF

'Fri

Mr1

,0'"

,s,V

,57W

Olir

VIr

i)1W

.`,V

rtW

ol.N

Otli

T17

/1'

4.73

1:1

;WI

+.1

2 (1

963-

64)

Ft. Y

ates

H S

Ft. Y

ates

, N. D

ak.

(5)

3 (1

964-

65)

Ft. Y

ates

H S

(5)

4 (1

965-

66)

6 (1

966-

67)

*DP

G

Ft. Y

ates

H S

Ft. Y

ates

H S

(8)

12

35

Stud

ent T

otal

N 1

09

98

*D -

Dro

pout

PPe

rsis

ter

G -

Gra

duat

e

FIG

. 31

(Litt

le E

agle

) M

ovem

ent o

f In

dian

Stu

dent

s T

hrou

gh S

choo

ls, N

ov. 1

962

- Ju

no 1

967

(1)

(2)

(3)

5

4.1

TABLE 96. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE B Y PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN LITTLE EAGLE DAY

SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63Grade 8

1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67TOTAL

Sex Total N N crio N % N % N % N ceAl N %

Male 4 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.6 1 25.0 0 0.0 1 25.0

Female 6 1 16.7 0 0.0 1 20.0 1 25.0 1 33.3 4 66.7

Total 10 1 10.0 0 0.0 1 11.1 2 25.0 1 16.7 5 50.0

108


PERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 10 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLEDIN LITTLE EAGLE DAY SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63Grade 8

1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67

N % N % N % N % N %

Dropout 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 97.0 2 80.5 1 98.0

Persister 9 97.3 8 97.3 8 97.9 6 96.5 5 93.0

TABLE 98 . AVERAGE ANNUAL GRADES TRANSLATED TO LETTER GRADINGS TO JUNE, 1967, FROMA TARGET POPULATION OF 10 AMERICAN H4DIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS,

ENROLLED IN LITTLE EAGLE DAY SCHOOL. SOUTH DAKOTAIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63Grade 8

1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67

N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. G .

Dropout I. D 0 N. A. 1 D 2 D 1. D

Persister 9 C 9 C- 8 C- 6 C- 5 C-

YE

AR

1 (

1962

-63)

Gra

de 8

.1,1

,1,,,

,,,I.

W,V

IP.1

.1i,.

...,,,

,olr

INW

'ralin

VO

ZY

-I'V

IOX

I'MW

.CV

1.-1

4F.R

MFN

Irt"

10.1

71,,M

9.M

.11.

7.77

0.47

r---

=ri

r

2 (1

963-

64)

Flan

drea

u In

d. S

ch.

Flan

drea

u, S

. Dak

.(1

)

3 (1

964-

65)

4 (1

965-

66)

5 (1

966-

67)

*DP

GT

McI

ntos

h E

lem

.Sc

hool

> M

cInt

osh

H S

McI

ntos

h H

SM

cInt

osh

H S

McI

ntos

h H

SM

cInt

osh,

S. D

ak.

(5)

(5)

(4)

--

44

(8)

Stud

ent T

otal

N 8

6

*D -

Dro

pout

P -

Pers

iste

rG

- G

radu

ate

54

-(4

)4

FIG

. 32

(McI

ntos

h) M

ovem

ent o

f In

dian

Stu

dent

s T

hrou

gh S

choo

ls, N

ov. 1

962

- Ju

ne 1

967

_

110

TABLE 99. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN McINTOSH ELEMENTARY


Year 1162-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8 TOTAL

Sex Total N N % N % N /0ci, N % N % N %

Male 3 1 33.3 1 50. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 2 66. 7

Female 5 1 20. 0 0 0. 0 1 25. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 2 40. 0

Total 8 2 25. 0 1 16. 7 1 20. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 4 50. 0

lii

TABLE 100. AVERAGE ANNUAL ATTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE , 1967, OF DROPOUTS ANDPERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 8 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED

IN McINTOSH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTAIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1265-86 1966-67Grade 8

N % N % N % N % N %

Dropout 2 77.0 1 50.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0

Persister 6 80.2 5 83.8 0 0.0 4 87.0 4 84.5

TABLE 101 AVERAGE ANNUAL GRADES TRANSLATED TO LETTER GRADINGS TO JUNE, 1967, FROMA TARGET POPULATION OF 8 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOU'IS AND PERSISTERS,

ENROLLED IN McINTOSH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTAIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8


Dropout 1 D 0 N. A. 1 D- 0 N. A. 0 N. A.

Persister 4 D+ 4 D+ 2 C- 4 D 4 D-

YE

AR

1 (

1962

-63)

Gra

de 8

Pier

re B

oard

ing

S ch

ool

Pier

re, S

. Dak

.(7

0)

Stud

ent T

otal

N 7

0

*D -

Dro

pout

P -

Pers

iste

rG

- G

radu

ate

2 (1

963-

64)

Rel

ianc

e H

SR

elia

nce,

S. D

ak.

(1)

Bra

iner

d hi

d. S

ch.

Hot

Spr

ings

, S. D

ak.

(1)

3 (1

964-

65)

4 (1

965-

66)

5 (1

966-

67)

*DP

G

Chi

locc

o In

d. S

chC

hilo

cco

Ind.

> C

hilo

cco

Ind.

> C

hilo

cco

Ind.

Chi

locc

o, O

kla.

(1)

(1)

-71-

11

2(1

)

Bro

wni

ng H

SB

row

ning

, Mon

t.(1

)

Ogl

ala

Com

m. S

ch.

Pine

Rid

ge, S

. Dak

.(1

)

Bro

wni

ng H

S(2

)

Flsn

drea

u In

d. S

ch.

Flan

drea

u In

d.>

Fla

ndre

au I

nd.

Flan

drea

u In

d.Fl

andr

eau,

S. D

ak.

(1)

(25)

Plan

kint

onSt

. Tr.

Sch

.(1

9)(3

0)la

nkin

ton,

S. D

ak.

(1)

Col

orad

o (P

ublic

)-->

ailli

ngs

H S

--->

Har

din

H S

Har

din

H S

(1)

Bill

ings

, Mon

t.H

ardi

n, M

ont.

(1)

(1)

(1)

Jam

esto

wn

Men

t. In

st.

Jam

esto

wn,

N. D

ak.

(1)

Ft. Y

ates

Fed

. H S

(15)

) FL

. Yat

es H

Ste

(14)

>Ft

. Yas

H S

Pt. Y

ates

, N. D

ak.

(16)

Wak

pala

H S

Wak

pala

, S. D

ak.-

-->

Wak

pala

H S

>W

akpa

la H

S>

Wak

pala

H S

(1)

(1)

(1)

1-

--

31

1213

H S

-->

Bill

ings

-1

-1

Ft. Y

ates

HS

2-

66

Man

dare

e Fe

d. H

SM

anda

ree

H S

Man

dare

e, S

. Dak

.(2

)(2

)

Mou

ntai

n V

iew

H S

(Cor

rect

iona

l)H

elen

a, M

ont.

(1)

56

Bus

by h

id. S

ch.

Bus

by, M

ont.

(1)

47

>M

anda

ree

H(2

)

39

FIG

. 33

(Pie

rre)

Mov

emen

t of

Indi

an S

tude

nts

Thr

ough

Sch

ools

, Nov

. 196

2-

June

196

7

Man

dare

e H

S2

Hal

liday

H S

>H

allid

ay H

SH

allid

ay, N

. Dak

.-

11

(1)

(8)

(3)

(20)

23

v4.

`';'

"c-

'.4

4) ..

,:',4

144

4rp

r'"

,4-

,,

,0."

14...

.4.

tof

t 4'

4,4

0O

F

P.,:4

"

.;:"'9

,V

QJJ

113

TABLE 102. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN PIERRE BOARDING


Year 1962-63Grade 8

1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67TOTAL


Male 25 5 20.0 3 15.0 2 11.8 3 20.0 3 25.0 16 64.0

Female 45 9 20.0 6 16.7 6 20.0 5 20.8 5 26.3 31 68.5

Total 70 14 20.0 9 16.1 8 17.0 8 20.5 8 25.8 47 67.1

114


IN PIERRE BOARDING SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8

N % N % N % N % N %

Dropout 14 100.0 8 78.1 8 70.1 8 67.4 7 65.0

Persister 5g 98.6 45 95.9 37 97.1 28 95.5 21 93.1


ENROLLED IN PIERRE BOARDING SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTAIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8

Dropout

Persister


14 B- 7 D+ 5 D+ 5 D- 2 D-

54 B- 42 C- 36 D+ 28 C- 21 C+

YE

AR

1 (

1962

-63)

Gra

de 8

ET

ff---

=-1

=I =

1I =

2 (1

963-

64)

3 (1

964-

65)

Hol

y R

osar

y M

issi

onH

oly

Ros

ary

Pine

Rid

ge, S

. Dak

.(2

)(1

) Com

m. S

ch.=

----

---

Ogl

ala

Com

m.

Pine

Rid

ge P

ublic

Sch

ool

ine

Rid

ge, S

. Dak

.(2

)Pi

ne R

idge

, S. D

ak.

(6)

(11)

Neb

rask

a-4

Neb

rask

a(1

)(1

)

1110

4.V

I'MW

MIN

4 (1

965-

66)

5 (1

966-

67)

*DP

G

QM

. ,

--H

oly

Ros

ary

Hol

y R

osar

y(2

)1

12

Ogl

ala

Com

m.

(3)

Neb

rask

a(1

)

Ogl

ala

Com

m.

11

Abe

rdee

n H

SA

berd

een,

Ida

ho1

1

Neb

rask

a1

1

Stud

ent T

otal

N 1

78

56

(3)

(2)

5

*D -

Dro

pout

P -

Pers

iste

rG

- G

radu

ate

< -

Sch

ool N

on-A

ttenl

ance

FIG

. 34

(Pin

e R

idge

) M

ovem

ent o

f In

dian

Stu

dent

s T

hrou

gh S

choo

ls, N

ov. 1

962

- Ju

ne 1

967

7

116

TABLE 105. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN PINE RIDGE PUBLIC


Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8 TOTAL

Sex Total N N % N % N % N coio N % N %

Male 6 1 16. 7 2 40. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 3 50. 0

Female 5 1 20. 0 1 25. 0 0 0. 0 1 33. 3 0 0. 0 3 60. 0

Total 11 2 18. 2 3 33. 3 0 0. 0 1 16.7 0 0. 0 6 54. 6

117


IN PINE RIDGE PUBLIC SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65Grade 8

1965-66 1966-67

N % N % N % N % N %

Dropout 2 60. 5 3 79.7 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0

Persister 9 93.7 4 95. 3 2 95. 5 2 89. 0 i 96. 0


ENROLLED IN PINE RIDGE PUBLIC SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTAIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65Grade 8

1965-66 1966-67


Dropout 1 D- 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 0 N. A.

Persister 9 C÷ 5 C- 3 C- 4 C- 5

LJ

1,4,

Z1,

1561

,*,1

,?ve

ml,q

,,,up

+T

ICY

4111

.--?

tiVIN

'IM.1

1+,7

0,11

1W,IM

,77-

)VP

IA:V

IVIT

ITIT

AT

T ,

YE

AR

1 (

1962

-63)

2 (1

963-

64)

Gra

de 8

3 (1

964-

65)

4 (1

965-

66)

00

5 (1

966-

67)

*DP

G

Hol

y R

osar

y M

issi

onSc

hool

Hol

y R

osar

yH

oly

Ros

ary

>H

oly

Ros

ary

Pine

Rid

ge, S

. Dak

.(I

)(2

)-

11

(3)

Porc

upin

e D

ay S

choo

lPo

rcup

ine,

S. D

ak.

Ogl

ala

Com

m. S

ch.

(14)

Pine

Rid

ge, S

. Dak

(7)

Wak

pala

H S

Wak

pala

, S. D

ak.

(1)

Ogl

ala

Com

m.V

NO

glal

a C

omm

.gl

ala

Com

m.

(3)

(8)

11

78

Stud

ent T

otal

N 1

411

1010

(1)

(1)

(8)

9

*D -

Dro

pout

P -

Pers

iste

rG

- G

radu

ate

FIG

.35

(Por

cupi

ne)

Mov

emen

t of

Indi

an S

tude

nte

Thr

ough

Sch

ools

, Nov

. 196

2 -

June

196

7

nni

4

TF;

119

TABLT; 108. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN PORCUPINE DAY


Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67

FiGrade 8

f

<

1

4,

ram,

TOTAL

Sex Total N N % N N %

10 2 20. 0 1 12. 5 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 1 14. 3 4 40. 0

Female 4 1 25. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0- 0 1 25. 0

Total 14 5 21. 4 1 9. 1 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 1 10. 0 5 35. 7

120

TABLE 109. A VERAGE ANNUAL ATTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE , 1967, OF DROPOUTS ANDPERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 14 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED

IN PORCUPINE DAY SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8

N % N % N % N % N %

Dropout 3 92.0 1 61.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 82.0

Persister 11 96.6 9 89.0 10 96.1 10 88.8 9 97.7


ENROLLED IN PORCUPINE DAY SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTAIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1982-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8

N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. G

Dropout 3 B 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 0 N. A. 1 D

Persister 11 B 9 D+ 8 C- 9 D+ 9 C-

I1

YE

AR

1 (

1962

-63)

Gra

de 8

St. F

ranc

is M

issi

on S

choo

lSt

. Fra

ncis

, S. D

ak.

(23)

Stud

ent T

otal

N 2

3

*D -

Dro

pout

P -

Pers

iste

rG

- G

radu

ate

2 (1

963-

64)

Tod

d C

ount

y H

SM

issi

on, S

. Dak

.(1

)

3 (1

964-

65)

McI

ntos

h H

SM

cInt

osh,

S. D

ak.

(1)

4 (1

965-

66)

5 (1

966-

67)

*DP

G

>St

. Fra

ncis

H S

> S

t. Fr

anci

s H

S>

St. F

ranc

is H

SSt

. Fra

ncis

H S

St. F

ranc

is, S

. Dak

.(1

9)(1

5)(2

1)

Nor

th J

r. 4

1 S

Rap

id C

ity, S

. Dak

.(1

)

23

Nor

th J

r. H

S(1

)

2115

FIG

. 36

(St.

Fran

cis)

Mov

emen

t of

Indi

an S

tude

nts

Thr

ough

Sch

ools

, Nov

. 196

2 -

June

196

7

Ada

, Okl

a.1

1

(1)

(2)

(11)

13

314

Z.

122

TABLE111. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN ST. FRANCIS MISSION

SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMEER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8 TOTAL


Male 12 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 3 25. 0 1 11. 1 0 0. 0 4 33. 3

Female 11 0 0. 0 2 18. 2 3 33. 3 0 0. 0 1 16. 7 6 54. 6

Total 23 0 0. 0 2 8. 7 6 28. 6 1 6. 7 1 7. 1 10 43. 5

sr

123

TABLE 112. AVERAGE ANNUAL ATTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DROPOUTS ANDPERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 23 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, ENROLLED

IN ST. FRANCIS MISSION SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63Grade 8

1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67

Dropout

Persister

N % N % N % N % N %

0 0.0 2 64.5 5 91.0 1 25.0 1 17.0

23 100.0 21 96.0 15 99.9 14 99.9 13 93.9


ENROLLED IN ST. FRANCIS MISSION SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTAIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63Grade 8

1963-64 1964-65 1965-66" 1966-67


Dropout 0 N. A. 1 D+ 2 C+ 0 N. A. 0 N. A.

Persister 23 C+ 20 C- 15 C 14 C- 13 C-

410.

7111

1112

010,

Vel

yo,1

^,00

,51.

013.

10%

-41

pom

1,01

Vyv

,,q1F

if,,,

1"ty

pen.

"4",

,1

YE

AR

1 (

1962

-63)

Gra

de 8

St. J

osep

h's

Mis

sion

Cha

mbe

rlai

n, S

. Dak

.(3

0)

Stud

ent T

otal

N 3

0

*D -

Dro

pout

P -

Pers

iste

rG

- G

radu

ate

2 (1

963-

64)

Pier

re I

nd. S

ch.

Pier

re, S

. Dak

(1)

Ter

ry H

Ser

ry, M

ont.

Ter

ry H

ST

erry

H S

(1)

(1)

(1)

3 (1

964-

65)

4 (1

965-

66)

--->

Pie

rre

Ind.

Sch

>Pi

erre

hid

. Sch

.

,

41-

6 (1

966-

67)

*DP

G

Pier

re I

nd. S

ch.

-1

1

--->

Ter

ry H

S

Che

yenn

e-E

agle

But

te H

S>

Che

yenn

e-E

agle

> C

heye

nne-

Eag

leC

heye

nne-

Eag

leE

agle

But

te, S

. Dak

.B

utte

H S

But

te H

SB

utte

H S

(1)

(2)

(3)

1-

22

Get

tysb

urg

H S

etty

sbur

g, S

. Dak

.(1

)

Imm

ac. C

once

p. H

SSt

epha

n, S

. Dak

.Im

mac

. Con

cep.

(4)

(5)

Ft. Y

ates

H S

Ft. Y

ates

, S. D

ak>

Ft. Y

ates

H S

(4)

(3)

Flan

drea

u In

d. S

ch.

Flan

drea

u, S

. Dak

.(3

)Fl

andr

eau

Ind.

(3)

Ogl

ala

Com

m. S

ch.

Pine

Rid

ge, S

. Dak

.>

Ogl

ala

Com

m.

(1)

(1)

> I

mm

ac. C

once

p.Im

mac

. Con

cep.

(4)

4

----

> F

t. Y

ates

H S

>Ft

. Yat

es H

S(3

)1

2

4 3

Flan

drea

u In

d.>

Fla

ndre

au I

nd.

(3)

22

Ogl

ala

Com

m.

Bot

tinea

u H

SB

ottin

eau,

N. D

ak.

Bot

tinea

u H

S--

-->

Bot

tinea

u H

S(1

)(2

)(2

)B

elco

urt H

S

5.O

glal

a C

omm

.

ham

berl

ain

H S

Cha

mbe

rlai

n, S

. Dak

.(1

)

St. P

aul's

Ind

. Sch

.M

arty

, S. D

ak.

> S

t. Pa

ul's

Ind

.(2

)(2

)

elia

nce

H S

Rel

ianc

e, S

. Dak

.(2

)

22

>R

elia

nce

H S

(2)

22

St. P

aul's

Ind

.(2

)

Rel

ianc

e H

S(1

)

21

Bel

cour

t, N

. Dak

.C

entr

al H

S-

22

Min

neap

olis

,M

inne

sota

---

> C

entr

al H

S(1

)1

FIG

. 37

(St.

Jose

ph's

Mis

sion

) M

ovem

ent o

f In

dian

Stu

dent

s T

hrou

gh S

choo

ls,

Nov

. 196

2 -

June

196

7

Oa

> S

t. Pa

ul's

bid

.-

11

>R

elia

nce

H S

-1

1

(2)

(1)

(17)

18

125

TABLE 114. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN ST. JOSEPH'S MISSION


Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8 TOTAL


Male 17 2 11. 8 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 2 13.3 4 23. 5

Female 13 6 46. 2 0 0. 0 1 14. 3 1 16. 7 0 0. 0 8 61. 5

Total 30 8 26. 7 0 0. 0 1 4. 6 1 4. 8 2 10. 0 12 40. 0

126

TABLE 114 AVERAGE ANNUAL ATTENDANCE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, OF DROPOUTS ANDPERSISTERS FROM A TARGET POPULATION OF 30 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED

IN ST. JOSEPH'S MISSION SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8

N % N % N % N % N %

Dropout 8 98.1 0 0.0 0 O. 0 1 47.0 2 81.5

Persister 22 95.5 17 97.8 18 97.7 17 96.8 16 95.3


ENROLLED IN ST. JOSEPH'S MISSION SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTAIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8


Dropout 8 C- 0 N. A, 1 D 0 N. A. 1 D+

Persister 22 C+ 21 C- 21 C- 20 C- 18 C+

YE

AR

1 (

1962

-63)

Gra

de 8

Siss

eton

Ele

m. S

ch.

Siss

eton

, S. D

ak.

(12)

Lin

coln

Jr.

H S

Boi

se, I

daho

(1)

= E

1=

I14

ti,r

4

2 (1

963-

64)

3 (1

964-

65)

Peev

er H

SPe

ever

, S. D

ak.

(1)

Siss

et(i

n H

S(8

)

\Har

din

H S

Har

din,

Mon

t.a)

(1)

Siss

eton

H S

7)(I

)

'NG

rani

te F

alls

,M

inne

sota

Gra

nite

Fal

ls(1

)(1

)

4 (1

965-

66)

5 (1

966-

67)

*DP

G

Che

yenn

e-E

agle

But

teH

SE

agle

But

te, S

.(1

)

isse

ton

H S

SiR

sete

n T

SSi

sset

on H

S(5

)\

(1)

2-

44

Wat

erto

wn

H S

Wat

erto

wn,

S. D

ak.

(1)

Stud

ent T

otal

N 1

211

*D -

Dro

pout

PPe

rsis

ter

G -

Gra

duat

e

> H

ardi

n H

S(1

)

Wat

erto

wn

H S

(1)

Plan

kint

onng

. Sch

.Pl

anki

nton

,S.

Dak

.(1

)

Flan

drea

u hi

d. S

ch.

Flan

drea

u, S

. Dak

land

reau

Ind

.(1

)(1

)

>G

rani

te F

alls

-1

*Wat

erto

wn

H S

----

-),W

ater

tow

n H

S(1

)

109

FIG

.3?

(Sis

seto

n) M

ovem

ent o

f In

dian

Stu

dent

s T

hrou

gh S

choo

ls, N

ov. 1

962

- Ju

ne 1

967

-1

1 1

(2)

-(6

)6

128

TABLE 117. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE , 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN SISSETON ELEMENTARY


Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-1.36 1966-67Grade 8 TOTAL


Male 5 0 0. 0 1 20. 0 1 25. 0 1 33. 3 0 0. 0 3 60. 0

Female 7 1 14. 3 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 2 33. 3 3 42. 9

Total 12 1 8. 3 1 9. 1 1 10. 0 1 11. 1 2 25. 0 6 50, 0


IN SISSETON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63Grade 8

1963-.64 1964-65 1965-66

N % ...17.- % N % N %

Dropout 1 56.0 1 95.0 1 61.0 1 74.0

Persister 11 96.3 10 93.3 9 93.4 8 91.5

TABLE na AVERAGE ANNUAL GRADES TRANSLATED TO LETTER GRADINGS TU,JUNE, 1967, FROMA TARGET POPULATION OF 12 AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS, DROPOUTS AND PERSISTERS,

ENROLLED IN SISSETON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTAIN GFtADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63Grade 8

P.3{I.1,

1963-64 1964-65 1965-66

Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av.- Gr. N Av. Gr.

Dropout 0 N. A.

Persister 11 C-

1 D- 1 D 0

10 C- 9 C- 8

N. A. 0 N. A.

6- 6 C-

YE

AR

1 (

1962

-63)

Gra

de 8

2 (1

963-

64)

/

Siss

etci

n H

S-S

isse

ton,

S. D

ak.

(1)

Ben

son

Co.

Tr.

Sch

.M

addo

ck, N

. Dak

.(1

)

Bel

cour

t Hig

hT

ekak

with

a In

dian

Bel

cour

t, N

. Dak

.C

hild

ren'

s H

ome

(1)

Siss

eton

, S. D

ak.

(8)

3 (1

964-

66)

> S

isse

ton

H S

(i)

Pow

ell C

ount

y H

SD

eer

Lod

ge, M

ont.

(1)

St. P

aul,

Min

n.(1

)

4 (1

965-

66)

I-i

CO 0

5 (1

966-

67)

*DP

GT

Imm

acul

ate

Con

cepU

onIm

mac

. Con

cep.

Ir.h

.tmac

. Con

cep.

Step

han,

S. D

ak.

(2)

1-

11

(1)

>B

elco

urt H

igh

Bel

cour

t Hig

h(1

)(1

)

Min

neap

olis

, Min

n.(1

)

Stud

ent T

otal

N 8

6

*13

- D

ropo

utP

- Pe

rsis

ter

G -

Gra

ckia

te

St. P

aul,

Min

n.(1

)St

. Pau

l, M

iun.

(1)

Min

neap

olis

, Min

n.(1

)

54

RG

.39

(Tek

akw

itha)

Mov

emen

t of

Indi

an S

tude

nts

Thr

ough

Sch

ools

, Nov

. 196

2-

June

196

7

..

(1)

(1)

1

-

L

131

TABLE 120. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN TEKAKWITHA INDIAN

CHILDREN'S HOME, SOUTH DAKOTA IN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67

Grade 8 TOTAL


Male 1 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 1 100. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 1 100. 0

Female 7 2 28. 6 1 20. 0 0 0. 0 2 50. 0 1 50. 0 6 85. 7

Total 8 2 25. 0 1 16. 7 1 20. C 2 50. 0 1 50. 0 7 87. 5

132


IN TEKAKWITHA LNDIAN CHILDREN'S HOME, SOUTH DAKOTAIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8

N % N % N % N crio N %

Dropout 1 100.0 1 76.0 1 76.0 2 67.5 1 50.0

Persister 7 99.3 5 93.4 4 93.8 2 100.0 1 100.0


ENROLLED IN TEKAKWITHA INDIAN CHILDREN'S HOME, SOUTH DAKOTAIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8

N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. Gr. N Av. G

Dropout 1 C 1 D- 1 D 1 D- 1 C

Persister 6 C 4 C- 3 D+ 2 C+ 1 C+

`447

i,g-I

F,75

.34)

, YE

AR

1 (

1962

-63)

Gra

de 8

Tod

d C

ount

yE

lem

. Sch

ool

Mis

sion

, S. D

ak.

(46)

Stud

ent T

otal

N 4

6

*D -

Dro

pout

P -

Pers

iste

rG

- G

radu

ate

+-

1 D

ecea

sed

rI

=rs

.71=

2 (1

963-

64)

Ben

nett

Cou

nty

H S

Mar

tin, S

. Dak

.(1

)

3 (1

964-

65)

Ben

nett

Cou

nty

H S

(1)

St. F

ranc

is H

SSt

. Fra

ncis

, S. D

ak.

St. F

ranc

is H

S(1

)(3

)

Tod

d C

ount

y H

S+

----

----

----

>M

issi

on, S

. Dak

.(3

5)

Lon

gmon

t H S

Lon

gmon

t, C

ol.

(1)

>T

odd

Cou

nty

H S

(21)

4 (1

965-

66)

>St

. Fra

ncis

H S

(3)

5 (1

966-

67)

*DP

G

----

> S

t. Fr

anci

s H

S-

11

>T

odd

Cou

nty

H S

> T

odd

Cou

nty

H S

(17)

2-

1414

1

Flan

drea

u In

d. S

ch.

Flan

drea

u, S

. Dak

.-->

Flan

drea

u In

d. S

ch.

(1)

(1)

11

Cal

ifor

nia

1

> F

land

reau

Ind

. Sch

.

WO

Flan

drea

u H

Sub

lic)

Flan

drea

u, S

. Dak

.(1

)Fl

andr

eau

H S

(1)

Rap

id C

ity H

SR

apid

City

, S. D

ak.

-

Eas

t Cha

rles

Mix

H S

Wag

ner,

S. D

ak.

>E

. Cha

rles

Mix

H S

E. C

harl

es M

ix H

S(1

)(1

)(1

)

3828

23(3

)-

(17)

17

FIG

.40

(Tod

d C

ount

y) M

ovem

ent o

f In

dian

Stu

dent

s T

hrou

gh S

choo

ls, N

ov. 1

962

- Ju

ne 1

967

CID

134

TABLE 12a PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE BY PERCENTAGES TO JUNE, 1967, FROM A TARGETPOPULATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS ENROLLED IN TODD COUNTY ELEMENTARY


Year 1P82-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8 TOTAL

Sex Total N N % N % N % N % N % N 9O

Male 28 5 17. 9 5 21. 7 3 16. 7 2 13. 3 2 15. 4 17 60. 7

Female 18 3 16. 7 4* 26. 7 2 20. 0 1 12. 5 1 14. 3 11 64. 7

Total 46 8 17. 4 9 23. 7 5 17. 9 3 13. 0 3 15. 0 28 62. 2

* - 1 Deceased

UI

11

Li

IJ

II

135


IN TODD COUNTY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTAIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8

Dropout

Persister

8 68.6 9 85.2 5 79.4 3 83.0 3 85.3

38 91.0 29 92.2 23 94.7 20 94.6 17 95.7


ENROLLED IN TODD COUNTY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, SOUTH DAKOTAIN GRADE EIGHT, NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63 1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67Grade 8


Dropout 3 C+ 5 D+ 4 D+ 3 D+ 1 D

Persister 35 C+ 29 C- 23 C 20 C+ 17 C+

136

TABLE 126. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS TO JUNE, 1967, FROMA SAMPLE OF 50% OF SOUTH DAKOTA SCHOOLS ENROLLING TEN OR MORE INDIAN

STUDENTS IN GRADE EIGHT AS OF NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63Grade 8

1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67TOTAL

Sex Total N N % N % N % N % N % N

Male 149 25 16.8 14 11.3 16 14.6 12 12.8 10 12.2 77 51.7

Female 167 38 22.8 19* 14.7 17 15.6 17 18.5 14 18.7 105 63.3

Total 316 63 19.9 33 13.0 33 15.1 29 15.6 24 15.3 182 57.8

* - 1 Deceased

ii

r-

137

TABLE 127. PROGRESSIVE DROPOUT RATE OF AMERICAN INDIAN STUDENTS TO JUNE, 1967, FROMA SAMPLE OF 50% OF SCHOOLS IN A SDC-STATE AREA ENROLLING TEN OR MORE

INDIAN STUDENTS IN GRADE EIGHT AS OF NOVEMBER, 1962

Year 1962-63

Grade 8

1963-64 1964-65 1965-66 1966-67

TOTAL

State Sex Total N N % N N N % N % N %

Oregon Mae 19 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 5.3 2 11.1 3 15.8

Female 23 0 0.0 1 4.4 1 4.6 4* 19.1 3 18.8 9 40.9

Total 42 0 0.0 1 2.4 1 2.4 5 12.5 5 14.7 12 29.3

Washington Male 46 1 2.2 5 11.1 5 12.5 4 11.4 1 3.2 16 34.8

Female 45 1 2.2 3 6.8 10 24.4 3 9.7 2 7.1 19 42.2

Total 91 2 2.2 8 9.0 15 18.5 7 10.6 3 5.1 35 38.5

Idaho Male 16 0* 0.0 2 13.3 1 7.7 0 0.0 1 8.3 4 26.7

Female 17 0 0.0 3 17.7 0 0.0 1 7.1 3 23.1 7 41.2

Total 33 0 0.0 5 15.6 1 3.7 1 3.9 4 16.0 11 34.4

Nknitana Male 132 13 9.9 6 5.0 13 11.5 8 8.0 9 9.8 49 37.1

Female 127 14 11.0 9 8.0 17 16.4 12 13.8 7 9.3 59 46.5

Total 259 27 10.4 15 6.5 30 13.8 20 10.7 16 9.6 108 41.7

North Dakota Mee 41 6 14.6 8 22.9 2 7.4 4 16.0 3 14.3 23 56.1

Female 58 2 3.5 3 5.4 9 17.0 9 20.5 5 14.3 28 48.3

Total 99 8 8.1 11 12.1 11 13.8 13 18.8 8 14.3 51 51.5

SoutliDalcota Male 149 25 16.8 14 11.3 16 14.6 12 12.8 10 12.2 77 51.7

Female 167 38 22.8 19* 14.7 17 15.6 17 18.5 14 18.7 105 63.3

Total 316 63 19.9 33 13.0 33 15.1 29 15.6 24 15.3 182 57.8

GRAND TOTAL 840 100 11.9 73 9.9 91 13.7 75 13.1 60 12.1 399 47.7

* - 1 Deceased

RACIAL BALANCE BY STATES (INDIAN COMPARED TONON-INDIAN STUDENT POPULATION) IN THE

SCHOOLS INCLUDED IN THE STUDY

In the following: "Majority" is where Indian students constitute 60

percent or more of the student population in a grade level; "Balance" is where

they are 40-59 percent of the student population; and "Minority" is where

Indian pupils comprise 39 percent or less of the student population. "Other"

refers to pupAls who are deceased, dropped out of school in that year, or for

whose school no record of racial balance was available. The number (N) of

Indian pupils enrolled in grade 8 is as of November, 1962, and the number of

Indian pupils enrolled in grade 10 is as of November of the year the students

attended grade 10.

OREGON

Where the Indian pupils were an eighth grade minority:

Then in the tenth grade these Indian pupils were:

Majority:Balance:Minority:Other:

N =

N =N =N =N =

42

2

0

400

100%

5%0%

95%0%

WASHINGTON

Where the Indian pupils were an eighth grade majority:

N = 31 34%


Majority: N = 9 29%Balance: N = 0 0%Minority: N = 18 58%Other: N = 4 13%


N = 60 66%


Majority: N = 0 0%

Balance: N = 0 0%

Minority: N = 54 90%

Other: N = 6 10%

Thus, for all Indian pupils in the tenth grade (included in this Study)in Washington:

Majority: N = 9 10%


Other: N = 10 11%

IDAHO


N = 33 100%


Majority: N = 4 12%

Balance: N = 0 0%

Minority: N = 25 76,%

Other: N = 4 12%

MONTANA

Where the Indian pupils were 2n eighth grade majority:

N = 128 49%


Majority: N = 86 67%

Balance: N = 0 0%

Minority: N = 1 1%

Other: N = 41 32%

139

140

Where the Indian pupils were an eighth grade balance:

Then in the tenth grade the Indian pupils were:

N = 62 24%



N = 69 27%



Thus, for all Indian pupils in the tenth grade (included in this StUdy)in Montana:


NORTH DAKOTA


N = 87 88%


Majority: N = 56 64%Balance: N = 0 0%

Minority: N = 10 12%Other: N = 21 24%


N = 12 12%




Thus, for all Indian pupils in the tenth grade (included in this Study)in North Dakota:

Majority: N = 59 60%


Other: N = 26 26%

SOUTH DAKOTA


N = 296 94%



Minority: N = 13 4%

Other: N = 115 39%


N = 20 6%

Then ii the tenth grade the Indian pupils were:

Majority: N = 0 0%

Balance: N = 0 0%


141

142

Thus, for all Indian pupils in the tenth grade (included in this Study)in South Dakota:

Majority: N = 168 53%Minority: N = 28 9%Other: N = 120 38%

CONCLUSION

This study has differed from other dropout studies in that the

students registered in the same grade on a specific date who constituted

the target population were each identified by name. The progress

through school of each student was then traced to high school graduation

or another specific date almost five years later unless death or dropout

from school occurred prior to that time. The data of the study have

been presented in a series of figures and tables without any attempt to

interpret findings. Thus the study, wbile documenting the magnitude of

the problem of the American Indian high school dropout, also has

demonstrated the feasibility of collecting hard data in this area.

The need to collect on an ongoing basis specific up-to-date data

on the progress of pupils, as well as on graduates and follow-:up of

graduates for at least a year after high school graduation, is of great

importance. Even where some attempts have been made by individual

schools or school systems to collect such data, efforts have been

hampered by a lack of uniformity in the methodology of collecting informa-

tion and in recording it. School personnel become very frustrated trying

to find out what happens to a transfer student when the receiving school

does not cooperate in acknowledging the transfer or in transferring

student records.

144The initiative in setting up a data collection bank and regu-

larized system of transferring sWdent records needs to be taken by an

agency which could also serve as the coordinator of such efforts. The

State Departments of Education are almost ideally suited to undertaking

such a task. In addition to access to computer facilities, Departments

probably have the greatest contact with the many organizations engaged

in the educational enterprise.

The Bureau bf Indian Affairs, with its special interest in the

education of Indian youth, could explore the possibility of calling a

meeting of interested institutions. For example, the BIA area office in

Portland, Oregon, could invite representatives from Oregon, Washington

and Idaho State Departments of Education and representatives from public

and private schools as well as from its own organization to a sponsored

conference on these vital topics. Such a conference, or series of con-

ferences, in addition to opening wider the channels of communications

among the participating bodies, might well lead to a pooling and sharing

of information beyond that envisioned in this modest proposal.

APP

EN

DIX

A

:E'±

c4a=

1.

OR

EG

ON

SC

HO

OL

DIR

EC

TO

RY

(SC

HO

OL

S L

IST

ED

AL

PHA

BE

TIC

AL

LY

BY

ST

AT

E W

HIC

H W

ER

EA

TT

EN

DE

D B

Y T

HE

TA

RG

ET

PO

PUL

AT

ION

OF

TH

EST

UD

Y,

NO

VE

MB

ER

, 196

2 -

JUN

E, 1

967)

Scho

olL

ocat

ion

Typ

eG

rade

s

Ben

d H

igh

Scho

olB

end

Publ

ic-D

ay9-

12H

elen

McC

une

Juni

or H

igh

Scho

olPe

ndle

ton

Publ

ic-D

ay7-

8Je

ffer

son

Hig

h Sc

hool

Port

land

Publ

ic-D

ay9-

12M

ac L

aren

Sch

ool f

or B

oys

Woo

dbur

nSt

ate

Cor

rect

iona

l9-

12

Mad

ras

Juni

or H

igh

Scho

olM

adra

sPu

blic

-Day

7- 8

Mad

ras

Hig

h Sc

hool

Mad

ras

Publ

ic-D

ay9-

12M

arsh

all H

igh

Scho

olPo

rtla

ndPu

blic

-Day

9-12

Mc

Ew

en H

igh

Scho

olA

then

aPu

blic

-Day

9-12

Nor

th S

alem

Hig

h Sc

hool

Sale

mPu

blic

-Day

9-12

Pend

leto

n H

igh

Scho

olPe

nd le

ton

Publ

ic-D

ay9-

12R

ober

t S. F

arre

ll H

igh

Scho

olSa

lem

Stat

e C

orre

ctio

nal

9-12

Sand

y H

igh

Scho

olSa

ndy

Publ

ic-D

ay9-

12

Uni

vers

ity o

f O

rego

nE

ugen

eC

orre

spon

denc

eG

. E.D

.W

ynne

Wat

ts H

igh

Scho

olPo

rtla

ndPu

blic

-Day

9-12

WA

SHIN

GT

ON

SC

HO

OL

DIR

EC

TO

RY

(SC

HO

OL

S L

IST

ED

AL

PHA

BE

TIC

AL

LY

BY

ST

AT

E W

HIC

H W

ER

E A

TT

EN

DE

DB

Y T

HE

TA

RG

ET

PO

PUL

AT

ION

OF

TH

EST

UD

Y, N

OV

EM

BE

R,

1962

- J

UN

E, 1

967)

Scho

olL

ocat

ion

Typ

eG

rade

s

Ale

xand

er J

unio

r H

igh

Scho

olB

ellin

gham

Tec

hnic

al S

choo

lFe

rnda

leB

ellin

gham

Publ

ic-D

ayPu

blic

-Day

7- 8

Ung

rade

dC

opp

le. J

unio

r H

igh

Scho

olO

mak

Publ

ic-D

ay7-

8C

oule

e D

am H

igh

Scho

olC

oule

e D

ani

Publ

ic-D

ay9-

12

Eas

t Val

ley

Hig

h Sc

hool

Spok

ane

Publ

ic-D

ay9-

12E

isen

how

er H

igh

Scho

olY

akim

aPu

blic

-Day

9-12

Fern

dale

Hig

h Sc

hool

Fern

dale

Publ

ic-D

ay9-

12H

oqui

am J

unio

r H

igh

Scho

olH

oqui

amPu

blic

-Day

7- 8

Inch

eliu

m E

lem

enta

ry S

choo

lIn

chel

ium

Publ

ic-D

ay1-

8In

chel

ium

Hig

h Sc

hool

Inch

eliu

mPu

blic

-Day

9-12

Jeff

erso

n Ju

nior

Hig

h Sc

hool

Oly

mpi

aPu

blic

-Day

7- 8

Mar

y W

alke

r H

igh

Scho

olSp

ring

dale

Publ

ic-D

ay9-

12

Moc

lips

Ele

men

tary

Sch

ool

Moc

lips

Publ

ic-D

ay1-

8M

oclip

s H

igh

Scho

olM

oc li

psPu

blic

-Day

9-12

Nea

h B

ay E

lem

enta

ry S

choo

lN

eah

Bay

Publ

ic-D

ay1-

8N

eah

Bay

Hig

h Sc

hool

Nea

h B

ayPu

blic

-Day

9-12

WA

SHIN

GT

ON

SC

HO

OL

DIR

EC

TO

RY

(C

ontin

ued)

(SC

HO

OL

S L

IST

ED

AL

PHA

BE

TIC

AL

LY

BY

ST

AT

E W

HIC

HW

ER

E A

TT

EN

DE

D B

Y T

HE

TA

RG

ET

PO

PUL

AT

ION

OF

TH

E S

TU

DY

, NO

VE

MB

ER

,19

62 -

JU

NE

, 196

7)

Scho

olL

ocat

ion

Typ

eG

rade

s

Nes

pele

m E

lem

enta

ry S

choo

lN

espe

lem

Publ

ic-D

ay1-

8O

kano

gan

Hig

h Sc

hool

Oka

noga

nPu

blic

-Day

9-12

Oly

mpi

a H

igh

Scho

olA

ubur

nPu

blic

-Day

9-12

Om

ak S

enio

r H

igh

Scho

olO

mak

Publ

ic-D

ay9-

12

Oro

ville

Hig

h Sc

hool

Oro

ville

Publ

ic-D

ay9-

12O

thel

lo H

igh

Scho

olO

thel

loPu

blic

-Day

9-12

Que

en A

nne

Hig

h Sc

hool

Seat

tlePu

blic

-Day

9-12

Stev

enso

n H

igh

Scho

olSt

even

son

Publ

ic-D

ay9-

12

Top

peni

sh H

igh

Scho

olT

oppe

nish

Publ

ic-D

ay9-

12W

apat

o E

lem

enta

ry S

choo

lW

apat

oPu

blic

-Day

1- 8

Wap

ato

Hig

h Sc

hool

Wap

ato

Publ

ic-D

ay9-

12W

hite

Pas

s H

igh

Scho

olR

andl

ePu

blic

-Day

9-12

Whi

te S

wan

Hig

h Sc

hool

Whi

te S

wan

Publ

ic-D

ay9-

12Y

e lm

Hig

h Sc

hool

Ye

lmPu

blic

-Day

9-12

1,

'.....

:_t±

.isio

......

'

1

MO

NT

AN

A S

CH

OO

L D

IRE

CT

OR

Y(S

CH

OO

LS

LIS

TE

D A

LPH

AB

ET

ICA

LL

Y B

Y S

TA

TE

WH

ICH

WE

RE

AT

TE

ND

ED

BY

TH

E

1-+

00

TA

RG

ET

PO

PUL

AT

ION

OF

TH

EST

UD

Y,

NO

VE

MB

ER

, 196

2 -

JUN

E, 1

967)

Scho

olL

ocat

ion

Typ

eG

rade

s

Bill

ings

Hig

h Sc

hool

Bill

ings

Publ

ic-D

ay9-

12B

ox E

lder

Hig

h Sc

hool

Box

Eld

erPu

blic

-Day

9-12

Bro

wni

ng H

igh

Scho

olB

row

ning

Publ

ic-D

ay9-

12B

usby

Ele

men

tary

Sch

ool

Bus

byFe

dera

l-D

ay-B

oard

ing

1- 8

Bus

by H

igh

Scho

olB

usby

Fede

ral-

Day

- B

oard

ing

9-12

Chi

nook

Hig

h Sc

hool

Chi

nook

Publ

ic-

Day

9-12

Cut

Ban

k H

igh

Scho

olC

ut B

ank

Publ

ic-D

ay9-

12D

odso

n H

igh

Scho

olD

odso

nPu

blic

-Day

9-12

Har

din

Juni

or H

igh

Scho

olH

ardi

nPu

blic

-Day

7- 8

Har

din

Hig

h Sc

hool

Har

din

Publ

ic-D

ay9-

12H

arle

m H

igh

Scho

olH

arle

mPu

blic

-Day

9-12

Hav

re J

unio

r H

igh

Scho

olH

avre

Publ

ic-D

ay7-

8

Hav

re H

igh

Scho

olH

avre

Publ

ic-D

ay9-

12H

ays

Ele

men

tary

Sch

ool

Hay

sPu

blic

-Day

k- 8

Hel

lgat

e H

igh

Scho

olM

isso

ula

Publ

ic-D

ay9-

12L

odge

Gra

ss E

lem

enta

ry S

choo

lL

odge

Gra

ssPu

blic

-Day

1- 8

MO

NT

AN

A S

CH

OO

L D

TR

EC

TO

RY

(C

ontin

ued)

(SC

HO

OL

S L

IST

ED

AL

PHA

BE

TIC

AL

LY

BY

ST

AT

E W

HIC

H W

ER

E A

TT

EN

DE

DB

Y T

HE

TA

RG

ET

PO

PUL

AT

ION

OF

TH

E S

TU

DY

,N

OV

EM

BE

R, 1

962

- JU

NE

, 196

7)

Scho

olL

ocat

ion

Typ

eG

rade

s

Lod

ge G

rass

Hig

h Sc

hool

Lod

ge G

rass

Publ

ic-D

ay9-

12M

ount

ain

Vie

w H

igh

Scho

olH

elen

aSt

ate

Voc

atio

nal

9-12

Scho

ol f

or G

irls

Nox

on H

igh

Scho

olN

oxon

Publ

ic-D

ay9-

12

Popl

ar E

lem

enta

ry S

choo

lPo

plar

Publ

ic-D

ayk-

8Po

plar

Hig

h Sc

hool

Popl

arPu

blic

- D

ay9-

12Po

wel

l Cou

nty

Hig

h Sc

hool

Dee

r L

odge

Publ

ic-D

ay9-

12R

onan

Hig

h Sc

hool

Ron

anPu

blic

-Day

9-12

St. I

gnat

ius

Ele

men

tary

Sch

ool

St. I

gnat

ius

Publ

ic-D

ay1-

8St

. Ign

atiu

s H

igh

Scho

olSt

. Ign

atiu

sPu

blic

-Day

9-12

St. L

abre

Mis

sion

Hig

h Sc

hool

Ash

land

Priv

ate-

Day

-Boa

rdin

g1-

12St

ate

Indu

stri

al S

choo

lM

iles

City

Stat

e C

orre

ctio

nal

9-12

Ter

ry H

igh

Scho

olT

erry

.Pu

blic

-Day

9-12

4'

IDA

HO

SC

HO

OL

DIR

EC

TO

RY

(SC

HO

OL

S L

IST

ED

AL

PHA

BE

TIC

AL

LY

BY

ST

AT

EW

HIC

H W

ER

E A

TT

EN

DE

D B

Y T

HE

TA

RG

ET

PO

PUL

AT

ION

OF

TH

EST

UD

Y, N

OV

EM

BE

R,

1962

-jUNE, 1967)

Scho

olL

ocat

ion

Typ

eG

rade

s

Abe

rdee

n H

igh

Scho

olA

lam

eda

Jani

or H

igh

Scho

olB

lack

foot

Hig

h Sc

hool

Abe

rdee

nPo

cate

lloB

lack

foot

Publ

ic-D

ayPu

blic

-Day

Publ

ic-D

ay

9-12

7- 8

9-12

Bro

okly

n Ju

nior

Hig

h Sc

hool

Salm

onPu

blic

-Day

7- 8

Haw

thor

ne J

unio

r H

igh

Scho

olPo

cate

lloPu

blic

-Day

7- 8

Hig

hlan

d H

igh

Scho

olPo

cate

lloPu

blic

-Day

9-12

Lap

wai

Jun

ior-

Seni

or H

igh

Scho

olL

apw

aiPu

blic

-Day

7-12

Lin

coln

Jun

ior

Hig

h Sc

hool

Boi

sePu

blic

-Day

7-8

Poca

tello

Hig

h Sc

hool

Poca

tello

Publ

ic-D

ay9-12

St.

Ant

hony

Tra

inin

g C

ente

rSt

. Ant

hony

Stat

e C

orre

ctio

nal

9-12

Uni

vers

ity o

f Id

aho

Mos

cow

Cor

resp

onde

nce

G. E

.D

.

,16

=

NO

RT

H D

AK

OT

A S

CH

OO

L D

IRE

CT

OR

Y(S

CH

OO

LS

LIS

TE

D A

LPH

AB

ET

ICA

LL

Y B

YST

AT

E W

HIC

H W

ER

E A

TT

EN

DE

DB

Y T

HE

TA

RG

ET

PO

PUL

AT

ION

OF

TH

EST

UD

Y, N

OV

EM

BE

R,

1962

- J

UN

E, 1

967)

Scho

olL

ocat

ion

Typ

eG

rade

s

Ass

umpt

ion

Abb

ey H

igh

Scho

olR

icha

rdto

nPr

ivat

e-D

ay-

Boa

rdin

g9-

12B

elco

urt H

igh

Scho

olB

elco

urt

Fede

ral-

Day

9-12

Ben

son

Cou

nty

Agr

icul

tura

l Tra

inin

g Sc

hool

Mad

dock

Publ

ic-D

ay-B

oard

ing

9-12

Bot

tinea

u H

igh

Scho

olB

ottin

eau

Publ

ic-D

ay9-

12

Dev

il's

Lak

e H

igh

Scho

olD

evil'

s L

ake

Publ

ic-D

ay9-

12Fo

rt T

otte

n E

lem

enta

ry S

choo

lFo

rt T

otte

nFe

dera

l-D

ay1-

8Fo

rt Y

ates

Hig

h Sc

hool

Fort

Yat

esFe

dera

l-D

ay-B

oard

ing

9-12

Hal

liday

Hig

h Sc

hool

Hal

liday

Publ

ic-D

ay9-

12

Jam

esto

wn

Men

tal I

nstit

utio

nJa

mes

tow

nSt

ate

Inst

icut

ion

Ung

rade

dM

addo

ck H

igh

Scho

olM

addo

ckPu

blic

-Day

9-12

Man

dare

e H

igh

Scho

olM

anda

ree

Fede

ral-

Day

-Boa

rdin

gk-

12N

ew T

own

Ele

men

tary

Sch

ool

New

Tow

nPu

blic

-Day

k- 8

New

Tow

n H

igh

Scho

olN

ew T

own

Publ

ic-D

ay9-

12N

otre

Dam

e A

cade

my

Will

ow C

ityPr

ivat

e-D

ay-B

oard

ing

9-12

Obe

ron

Hig

h Sc

hool

Obe

ron

Publ

ic-D

ay9-

12R

olla

Pub

lic H

igh

Scho

olR

olla

Publ

ic-D

ay9-

12

St. A

nn's

Mis

sion

Ele

men

tary

Sch

ool

Bel

cour

tPr

ivat

e-D

ay-B

oard

ing

1- 8

Whi

te S

hiel

d H

igh

Scho

olR

oseg

len

Fede

ral-

Day

9-12

Will

isto

n H

igh

Scho

olW

illis

ton

Publ

ic-D

ay9-

12

SOU

TH

DA

KO

TA

SC

HO

OL

DIR

EC

TO

RY

(SC

HO

OL

S L

IST

ED

AL

PHA

BE

TIC

AL

LY

BY

ST

AT

EW

HIC

H W

ER

E A

TT

EN

DE

D B

Y T

HE

I-I

01 L\D

TA

RG

ET

PO

PUL

AT

ION

OF

TH

E S

TU

DY

, NO

VE

MB

ER

,19

62 -

JU

NE

, 196

7)

Scho

olL

ocat

ion

Typ

eG

rade

s

Ben

nett

Cou

nty

Hig

h Sc

hool

Mar

tinPu

blic

-Day

9-12

Bra

iner

d In

dian

Sch

ool

Hot

Spr

ings

Priv

ate-

Boa

rdin

g1-

12C

ham

berl

ain

Hig

h Sc

hool

Cha

mbe

rlai

nPu

blic

-Day

9-12

Che

yenn

e-E

agle

But

te S

choo

lE

agle

But

teFe

dera

l-D

ay-B

oard

ing

k-12

Cla

rem

ont H

igh

Scho

olC

lare

mon

tPu

blic

-Day

9-12

Eas

t Cha

rles

Mix

Jun

ior-

Seni

or H

igh

Scho

olW

agne

rPu

blic

-Day

7-12

Flan

drea

u H

igh

Scho

olFl

andr

eau

Publ

ic-D

ay9-

12Fl

andr

eau

Indi

an S

choo

lFl

andr

eau

Fede

ral-

Boa

rdin

g9-

12

Fort

Tho

mps

on E

lem

enta

ry S

choo

lFo

rt T

hom

pson

Fede

ral-

Day

1- 8

Gan

n V

alle

y H

igh

Scho

olG

ann

Val

ley

Publ

ic-D

ay9-

12G

etty

sbur

g H

igh

Scho

olG

etty

sbur

gPu

blic

-Day

9-12

He

Dog

Sch

ool

Mis

sion

Fede

ral-

Day

1- 8

Hol

y R

osar

y M

issi

on S

choo

lPi

ne R

idge

Priv

ate-

Boa

rdin

gk-

12H

ot S

prin

gs H

igh

Scho

olH

ot S

prin

gsPu

blic

-Day

9-12

Imm

acul

ate

Con

cept

ion

Scho

olSt

epha

nPr

ivat

e-B

oard

ing

6-12

Litt

le E

agle

Day

Sch

ool

Litt

le E

agle

Fede

ral-

Day

1- 8

McI

ntos

h E

lem

enta

ry S

choo

lM

cInt

osh

Publ

ic-D

ay1-

8M

cInt

osh

Hig

h Sc

hool

McI

ntos

hPu

blic

-Day

9-12

Mob

ridg

e H

igh

Scho

olM

obri

dge

Publ

ic-D

ay10

-12

Nor

th J

unio

r H

igh

Scho

olR

apid

City

Publ

i c-D

ay7-

8

SOU

TH

DA

KO

TA

SC

HO

OL

DIR

EC

TO

RY

(Con

tinue

d)(S

CH

OO

LS

LIS

TE

D A

LPH

AB

ET

ICA

LL

YB

Y S

TA

TE

WH

ICH

WE

RE

AT

TE

ND

ED

BY

TH

ET

AR

GE

T P

OPU

LA

TIO

N O

F T

HE

STU

DY

, NO

VE

MB

ER

,19

62 -

JU

NE

, 196

7)

Scho

olL

ocat

ion

Typ

eG

rade

s

Ogl

ala

Com

mun

ity S

choo

lPi

ne R

idge

Fede

ral-

Day

-Boa

rdin

g1-

12Pe

ever

Hig

h Sc

hool

Peev

erPu

blic

-Day

9-12

Pier

re B

oard

ing

Scho

olPi

erre

Fede

ral-

Boa

rdin

g1-

8Pi

ne R

idge

Ele

men

tary

Sch

ool

Pine

Rid

gePu

blic

-Day

k- 8

Plan

kint

on H

igh

Scho

olPl

anki

mon

Publ

ic-D

ay9-

12Po

rcup

ine

Day

Sch

ool

Porc

upin

eFe

dera

l-D

ay1.

- 8

Rap

id C

ity H

igh

Scho

olR

apid

City

Publ

ic-D

ay9-

12R

elia

nce

Hig

h Sc

hool

Rel

ianc

ePu

blic

-Day

9-12

St. F

ranc

is M

issi

on S

choo

lSt

. Fra

ncis

Priv

ate-

Boa

rdin

g1-

12St

. Jos

eph'

s In

dian

Sch

ool

Cha

mbe

rlai

nPr

ivat

e-B

oard

ing

1- 8

St. P

aul's

Ind

ian

Scho

olM

arty

Priv

ate-

Day

-Boa

rdin

g1-

12Si

sset

on H

igh

Scho

olSi

sset

onPu

blic

-Day

9-12

Tim

ber

Lak

e H

igh

Scho

olT

imbe

r L

ake

Publ

ic-D

ay9-

12T

odd

Cou

nty

Ele

men

tary

Sch

ool

Mis

sion

Publ

ic-D

ayk-

8T

odd

Cou

nty

Hig

h Sc

hool

Mis

sion

Publ

ic-D

ay-B

oard

ing

9-12

Wak

pala

Hig

h Sc

hool

Wak

pala

Publ

ic-D

ay9-

12

Wat

erto

wn

Juni

or H

igh

Scho

olW

ater

tow

nPu

blic

-Day

7-. 9

Wat

erto

wn

Seni

or H

igh

Scho

olW

ater

tow

nPu

blic

-Day

10-1

2W

hite

Riv

er H

igh

Scho

olW

hite

Riv

erPu

blic

-Day

9-12

FED

ER

AL

SC

HO

OL

DIR

EC

TO

RY

(SC

HO

OL

S L

IST

ED

AL

PHA

BE

TIC

AL

LY

OU

TSI

DE

TH

E S

lX-S

TA

TE

RE

GIO

N O

FO

RIG

INA

TIO

NO

F PU

PIL

S W

HIC

H W

ER

E A

TT

EN

DE

DB

Y T

HE

TA

RG

ET

PO

PUL

AT

ION

o4=

OF

TH

E S

TU

DY

,N

OV

EM

BE

R, 1

962

- JU

NE

, 196

7)

OK

LA

HO

MA

Scho

olL

ocat

ion

Typ

eG

rade

s

Che

yenn

e-A

rapa

ho S

choo

lC

hilo

cco

Indi

an S

choo

lC

onch

o D

emon

stra

tion

Scho

olFo

rt S

ill I

ndia

n Sc

hool

Riv

ersi

de S

choo

l

Con

cho

Chi

locc

oC

onch

oL

awto

n.A

nada

rko

Fede

ral-

Boa

rdin

gFe

dera

l-B

oard

ing

Fede

ral-

Boa

rdin

gFe

dera

l- B

oard

ing

Fede

ral-

Boa

rdin

g

1- 8

9-12

7-12

9-12

9-12

NE

W M

EX

ICO

Inst

itute

of

Am

eric

an I

ndia

n A

rts

Sant

e Fe

Fede

ral-

Boa

rdin

g10

-12

OT

HE

R S

TA

TE

S IN

WH

ICH

TH

E T

AR

GE

TPO

PUL

AT

ION

AT

TE

ND

ED

PU

BL

ICSC

HO

OL

S

Ari

zona

Cal

ifor

nia

Col

orad

o

Ken

tuck

yM

inne

sota

Neb

rask

a

Okl

ahom

aT

exas

Uta

hW

yom

ing

APPENDIX BDIRECTORY OF TRIBES ENROLLING MORE THAN 200 MEMBERS 155

TAKEN FROM CENSUS OF TRIBES, 1962

State Tribal Units On Off Total

Oregon Umatilla 591 104 645

Warm Springs 1 3E13 63 1,446

TOTAL 1,924 167 2,091

Washington Colville 1,712 1,321 3,033Lummi 600 60 660

Makah 558 0 558

Muck leshoot 271 35 306

Quinault 574 20 594

Spokane 310 307 617

Swinomish 320 47 367

Tula lip 376 53 429

Yakima 2,837 525 362° , L____

TOTAL 7,558 2,368 9,926

Idaho Couer d'Alene 363 160 523

Fort Hall 1,748 25 1,773Nez Perce 1,268 262 1,530

TOTAL 3,379 447 3,826

Montana Blackfeet 5,304 0 5,804Crow 3,126 400 3,526Flathead 2,881 0 2,881Fort Belknap 1,420 630 2,050Fort Peck 3,056 215 3,271North'n Cheyenne 2,129 0 2,129Rocky Boys 900 0 900

TOTAL

_19,:316 1,245 20,561

156 DIRECTORY OF TRIBES EEROLLING MORE THAN 200 MEMBERSTAKEN FROM CENSUS OF TRIBES, 1962

(Continued)

State Tribal Units On Off Total

North Dakota Fort Berthold 1,815 439 2,254Fort Totten 1,426 50 1,476Standing Rock 2,050 0 2,050Turtle Mountain 2,956 2,754 5,710

TOTAL 8,247 3,243 11,490

South Dakota Cheyenne River 3,734 0 3,734Crow Creek 902 156 1,058Flandreau 46 237 283Lower Brule 428 81 509

Pine Ridge 8,480 300 8,780Rosebud 5,844 1,357 7,201Sisseton 2,173 98 2,271Standing Rock 2,300 0 2,300Yankton 1 490 43 1,533

TOTAL 25,397 2,272 27,669

the magnitude of the dropout problem among …the magnitude of the dropout problem among indians was...

Documents