the long road to recovery - tn.govtennessee monthly sales & use tax revenue id dindexed to bi...
TRANSCRIPT
The Long Road to RecoveryThe Long Road to Recovery
Matthew N. MurraySeptember 10, 2010
Forecasting is like trying to drive forward while lookingdrive forward while looking out your rear‐view mirror
Real GDP: 2005 to 2013
15,000 4.0
14,000
14,500
1 0
2.0
3.0
05 dollars
Percentage c
13,000
13,500
‐1.0
0.0
1.0
ns of chained
200
hange, same qu
12,000
12,500
4 0
‐3.0
‐2.0
Real GDP
Growth
Level, billion
arter last year
11,500
05.1 06.1 07.1 08.1 09.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1
‐5.0
‐4.0
Matthew N. Murray, UT Center for Business & Economic Research 3September 2010
Source: IHS Global Insight, Inc.
Household Net Worth: 2005.1 to 2013.4
20 0
30.0
10.0
20.0
ual rate
‐10.0
0.0
age change, ann
30 0
‐20.0Percenta
‐40.0
‐30.0
05.1 06.1 07.1 08.1 09.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1
Matthew N. Murray, UT Center for Business & Economic Research 4September 2010
Source: IHS Global Insight, Inc.
U.S. Housing Starts and Light Vehicle Sales:2005 t 20132005 to 2013
2 5 20 0Housing Starts
(millions, annual rate)
2.0
2.5
16.0
18.0
20.0Light Vehicle Sales
1.5
10.0
12.0
14.0
sing Starts
Light Vehicle
0.5
1.0
4.0
6.0
8.0Hous Sales
0.0
2005.1 2006.1 2007.1 2008.1 2009.1 2010.1 2011.1 2012.1 2013.1
0.0
2.0
Matthew N. Murray, UT Center for Business & Economic Research 5September 2010
Source: IHS Global Insight, Inc.
U.S. Nonfarm Employment: 2005 to 2013U S o a p oy e t 005 to 0 3
140 3.0
(seasonally adjusted)
136
138
0 0
1.0
2.0
s)Percentage c
132
134
‐2.0
‐1.0
0.0
L l
oyment (million
change, same qu
126
128
130
5 0
‐4.0
‐3.0LevelGrowthEmpl
uarter last year
124
126
05.1 06.1 07.1 08.1 09.1 10.1 11.1 12.1 13.1
‐6.0
‐5.0
Matthew N. Murray, UT Center for Business & Economic Research 6September 2010
Source: IHS Global Insight, Inc.
Annual Growth in Tennessee County Total Covered* E l t 2008 t 2009Employment: 2008 to 2009
Tennessee: ‐5.7%United States: ‐4.6%
Loss greater than 10.0%Loss of 5.1% to 10.0%Loss of 0.1% to 5.0%Gain of 0.0% to 8.0%
*Total employment covered by the state unemployment insurance program.
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Matthew N. Murray, UT Center for Business & Economic Research 7September 2010
Tennessee Nonfarm Employment: 2006 to 2012
2,850.0 3.0
(seasonally adjusted)p y
2,750.0
2,800.0
0 0
1.0
2.0
nds)
Percentage c
2,650.0
2,700.0
‐2.0
‐1.0
0.0
LevelG hym
ent (tho
usan
change, same q
2,550.0
2,600.0
‐5.0
‐4.0
‐3.0Growth
Employ
uarter last year
2,450.0
2,500.0
2006.1 2007.1 2008.1 2009.1 2010.1 2011.1 2012.1
‐7.0
‐6.0
r
Matthew N. Murray, UT Center for Business & Economic Research 8September 2010
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics and CBER-UT.
Tennessee County Unemployment Rate: July 2010y p y y(not seasonally adjusted)
Tennessee: 9.6% NSAUnited States: 9.7% NSA
Less than 9.5%9.5% to 10.9%11.0% to 13.4%13.5% to 15.7%19.4%Tennessee: 9.8% SA
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.
United States: 9.5% SA
Matthew N. Murray, UT Center for Business & Economic Research 9September 2010
Annual Unemployment Rate: 2009 to 2019p y
12.0TN U.S.
10.5 10.29.4
8.59.3
9.7 9.69.0
8.3
10.0
(%)
7.87.2 7.0 6.8 6.5 6.2 5.9
7.67.0
6.66.1 5.8 5.56.0
8.0
oym
ent r
ate
(
4.0
unem
plo
0.0
2.0
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Matthew N. Murray, UT Center for Business & Economic Research 10September 2010
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics; IHS Global Insight, Inc.; and CBER-UT.
Change in Total Tax Revenue, July‐March, FY2009 to FY2010
Note: Tennessee’s total tax revenue growth for FY2010 over FY 2009 is (1.6)%.
U.S. = ‐4.6%
Greater than ‐2.5%13
‐8.0% to ‐2.5%22
Less than ‐8.0%15
Matthew N. Murray, UT Center for Business & Economic Research 11September 2010
‐‐13‐‐‐‐22‐‐‐‐15‐‐
Change in Sales Tax Revenue, July‐March, FY2009 to FY2010
Note: Tennessee’s sales tax revenue growth for FY2010 over FY 2009 is (3.7)%.
U.S. = ‐5.2%
Greater than ‐4.4%12
‐6.0% to ‐4.4%Less than ‐6.0% NA5
Matthew N. Murray, UT Center for Business & Economic Research 12September 2010
‐‐12‐‐‐‐11‐‐‐‐22‐‐ ‐‐5‐‐
Growth in Tennessee Total Tax Collections:1971–2010
25.0% Actual
Adjusted for Rate Increases
15.0%
20.0%Adjusted for Rate Increases
5.0%
10.0%
‐5.0%
0.0%
‐15.0%
‐10.0%
Matthew N. Murray, UT Center for Business & Economic Research 13September 2010
71 73 75 77 79 81 83 85 87 89 91 93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09
Tennessee Monthly Sales & Use Tax Revenue I d d t B i i f R iIndexed to Beginning of Recession
180.0
120 0
140.0
160.0
0.0
80.0
100.0
120.0
mon
th #1 = 10
20 0
40.0
60.0Nov 1973Jan 1980Jul 1990Mar 2001
Inde
x, m
0.0
20.0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36
Mar 2001Dec 2007
Number of months from recession start month
Matthew N. Murray, UT Center for Business & Economic Research 14September 2010
Number of months from recession start month
Source: Calculated by CBER using data from the Tennessee Department of Revenue.
Tax Collections by Source: FY2007–FY2011Tax Collections by Source: FY2007 FY2011(billions of dollars)
Ann. Avg. PercentageEst Est Growth of FY11Est. Est. Growth of FY11
FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY07–FY11 TOTALSales 6.83 6.87 6.34 6.13 6.25 ‐2.2 61.1%
Franchise & Excise 1.74 1.65 1.32 1.45 1.48 ‐4.0 14.5%Gas, Motor Fuel,
Gas Inspect.0.85 0.85 0.82 0.82 0.83 ‐0.6 8.1%
Motor Vehicle R i t ti
0.26 0.26 0.25 0.24 0.25 ‐1.0 2.4%Registrations
Privilege 0.32 0.29 0.26 0.23 0.24 ‐6.9 2.3%Gross Receipts 0.27 0.30 0.31 0.34 0.32 4.3 3.1%
Other Tax Revenue 0.71 0.94 0.87 0.85 0.86 4.9 8.4%Other Tax Revenue 0.71 0.94 0.87 0.85 0.86 4.9 8.4%TOTAL 10.98 11.16 10.17 10.06 10.23 ‐1.8 100.0%
Federal Funds 9.39 9.59 10.95 12.92 12.37 7.13 —
Matthew N. Murray, UT Center for Business & Economic Research 15September 2010
Tennessee Tax Revenues, Total and as a Share of lPersonal Income: 1988–011
12,000 5.5
8,000
10,000
4.5
5.0
Tax Redo
llars)
6,000
8,000
4.0
4.5
Tax Revenues
venue as Share (m
illions of d
2 000
4,000
3 0
3.5Tax Revenues as Share of PI
re of PI (%)
Tax Revenu
e
0
2,000
1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003 2006 2009
2.5
3.0
Matthew N. Murray, UT Center for Business & Economic Research 16September 2010
1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003 2006 2009
Total Tennessee Tax Revenuesll b d i /Fully Rebound in 2012/13
$16,000
$12,000
$14,000
ars)
$8,000
$10,000 Policy Neutral Scenario
Policy Change Scenario
(mill
ions
of d
olla
$4,000
$6,000
tax
reve
nues
(
$0
$2,000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
← →History← → CyclicalForecast
Trend Forecast← →
Matthew N. Murray, UT Center for Business & Economic Research 17September 2010
Rainy Day Fund BalanceRainy Day Fund Balance
800.0 $750M
600.0
700.0
400.0
500.0
ns of d
ollars $445M
200.0
300.0million
0.0
100.0$101M
Matthew N. Murray, UT Center for Business & Economic Research 18September 2010
FY98 FY99 FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11
TennCare Reserves
$550600.0
(millions of dollars)
$474$434 $434500.0
$264300.0
400.0
200.0
0.0
100.0
Matthew N. Murray, UT Center for Business & Economic Research 19September 2010
FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11
Base Funding Reductions: FY2009–FY2010g(millions of dollars)
Percentage ofFY09 FY10 FY11 TOTAL Appropriations
Education (K‐12) ‐9.4 ‐68.9 ‐34.8 ‐113.1 ‐3.0%Higher Education ‐56.0 ‐181.7 ‐69.8 ‐307.5 ‐19.2%TennCare ‐87.7 ‐255.6 ‐200.5 ‐543.8 ‐20.2%Human Services ‐5.8 ‐11.8 ‐5.4 ‐23.0 ‐12.5%Mental Health ‐4.0 ‐22.8 ‐6.2 ‐33.0 ‐18.4%Correction ‐17.3 ‐64.3 ‐6.4 ‐88.0 ‐13.2%Other Programs ‐98.5 ‐148.8 ‐88.1 ‐335.4 ‐15.9%
%
Note: Discretionary Base excludes K‐12 Basic Education Program, dedicated funds, statutory positions, and various poverty programs.
‐278.7 ‐753.9 ‐411.2 ‐1443.8 ‐12.9%
Matthew N. Murray, UT Center for Business & Economic Research 20September 2010
The University of Tennessee SystemBase State Appropriation Dollars Compared to Inflation‐Adjusted DollarsBase State Appropriation Dollars Compared to Inflation Adjusted Dollars(HEPI FY2002–FY2011)
600.0
400.0
500.0
State Appropriations Base
300.0Base Adj for Inflation (HEPI Base = 2002)
100.0
200.0
26 percent decrease in "real" value
0.0
FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11
Matthew N. Murray, UT Center for Business & Economic Research 21September 2010
Source: The University of Tennessee, Office of the Treasurer.
The University of TennesseeB d t d U t i t d R FY2011Budgeted Unrestricted Revenues: FY2011
REVENUE SOURCES
4%4%
5%
Tuition & Fees
9%39%
Tuition & Fees
Appropriations
MOE & ARRA
Grants & Contracts
Sales & Service
Gifts & Misc.
39%
Matthew N. Murray, UT Center for Business & Economic Research 22September 2010
Source: The University of Tennessee, Office of the Treasurer.
The University of TennesseeT Y U t i t d RTen Year Unrestricted Revenues
Appropriations MOE & ARRA TuitionGrants & Contracts Sales & Service Gifts & Misc.
1,000
1,200Grants & Contracts Sales & Service Gifts & Misc.
600
800
400
600
0
200
Matthew N. Murray, UT Center for Business & Economic Research 23September 2010
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Source: The University of Tennessee, Office of the Treasurer.
CBO’s Baseline Budget Outlook‐‐D ’ E H l f h F d !Don’t Expect Help from the Feds!
02009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
0.0
-400
-2002009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
-2.0
rs D
-800
-600
-6.0
-4.0
ns o
f dol
lar D
eficit, perc
1 200
-1,000
800
-8.0
6.0
DeficitDef
icit,
bill
iocent of G
DP
-1,400
-1,200
-10.0% of GDP
D
Matthew N. Murray, UT Center for Business & Economic Research 24September 2010
-1,600 -12.0Source: Congressional Budget Office.
Center for Business & Economic ResearchCenter for Business & Economic Research
College of Business AdministrationThe University of Tennessee, Knoxville716 Stokely Management Centery g916 Volunteer BoulevardKnoxville, Tennessee 37996‐0570
phone: 865.974.5441fax: 865.974.3100
http://cber bus utk eduhttp://cber.bus.utk.edu
Matthew N. Murray, UT Center for Business & Economic Research 25September 2010