"the liberal technocrat"- adolph l. reed jr

Upload: alan-r-takeall

Post on 26-Feb-2018

280 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/25/2019 "The Liberal Technocrat"- Adolph L. Reed Jr.

    1/5

    6, 1988

    167

    REED

    JR.

    TRULY DISADVANTAGED:

    City, the Underclass, and Pub-

    Press.

    254

    pp.

    wing the Reagan years public

    discussion about poverty has

    :moved considerably o the right

    I

    to focus on the behavior of the

    16 the meaner-spirited versions of

    a

    logy; according to the better-

    s imply a fate

    efalls certain types of individu-

    on

    the one side

    a brand of

    love to wean the poor from

    ntal appeals on behalf of pathetic

    who suffer from a disease

    poverty. In

    William Julius Wilson at-

    to

    shift the terms of this discus-

    away

    from such banalities. His in-

    are to address the problems of

    detail, the policy implications

    that analysis. He succeeds to the ex-

    that he offers detailed view that

    a

    broader, more dynamic

    N-ly a decade ago Wilson published

    of

    socioeconomic

    mportantthan

    of

    Americans. The book debated

    ylackchol-

    severalyears, houghmostof

    Ji. associate

    is

    ofThe. Jesse Jackson Phenomenon

    Press The Politi-

    Thought of W.E;B. DuBois

    Press, also

    Race, Politics and Culture: Crit-

    Essays on he Radicalism of the

    Press .

    the criticism

    of

    it arose of fearsabout

    its implications and not from Wilsons

    arguments, which were hardly. unsup-

    portive of

    an

    affirmative action agenda.

    Of course conservatives have tried to

    undercut programs such as affirmative

    action by appropriating Wilsons argu-

    ment that they are disproportionately

    beneficial to upwardly mobileblacks,

    but Wilson imself has consistently

    maintained that race-specificpolicies,

    properly applied, crucial to the

    ad-

    vancement

    of

    racial democracy. His

    ar-

    gument about the declining significance

    of race has also been attractive to many

    on the left, because it refuses to treat

    racism as

    a

    monolithic force, unaffected

    by historical context. What Wilson of-

    fers is

    a

    view of race that links changes

    in the character of racial subordination

    to shifting pational economic impera-

    tives. In folding racial dynamics into

    economic dynamics this view sidesteps

    the apparent autonomy of racial con-

    flict in the United States-a problem

    that has long plagued the lefts vision

    of

    a politics based on interracial solidar-

    ity. Moreover, Wilson identifies himself

    proudly

    as

    a social democrat and shows

    some initation-at those who have sought

    to associate him with black neoconserva-

    tism.

    Part

    of his project in

    is to extend his argu-

    ment about race

    and

    economics to the

    urban underclass.

    Wilsons story is straightforward.

    Blacks (and Hispanics) moved into cities

    in great numbers just when the econom-

    ic hub of urban life was changing from

    god-producing o ~~e prod~~

    ing activity. But

    as a

    result

    of

    that

    change, those cities-mainly inhe

    Northeast and Midwest-had lost the

    sorts

    of

    lower-skill jobs needed to

    accommodate the influx. Clustered in

    ghetto neighborhoods because of the

    opportunity-structure,blacks

    and Hispecs experienced the social

    isolation that produced undesirable

    concentration effects. The latter in-

    clude the well-known tangle-of-patholo-

    gy litany-crime, een-age pregnancy,

    female-headed families, out-of-wedlock

    births and welfare dependency. In

    sons view, this dynamic can under-

    stood only by recognizing hat it derives

    not so much from contemporary racism

    as rom heoperation of impersonal

    economic and demographic forces.

    He takes great pains to distinguish

    himself from the culture of poverty

    tlieorists-e.g., Murray and the disin

    genuous, Nicholas Lemann-who ascri

    the intractability of poverty:to the at-

    titudes, values and behavior of fie inner

    city poor. FprWilson the characteristic

    of

    ghetto-specific .culture are prag-

    matic adaptations to isolation and to

    limited opportunity, both ofwhichhave

    made it ?difficult to sustain the basic

    institutions in these neighborhoods (in-

    cluding churches, stores, schools, recre

    ational facilities, etc.) in the face of in-

    creased joblessness caused -by the fre-

    quent recessions during the and

    early and changes in the urban

    job structure.The deterioration

    of

    those local institutions has led to socia

    disorganization and the decline of ex-

    plicit norms and sanctions against aber-

    rant behavior.UnlikeLemann,Murray

    et al., Wilson argues that the key con-

    clusion from a public policy perspectiv

    is that programs created to alleviate

    poverty, joblessness, and related forms

    of

    social dislocation should place pri-

    mary focus on changing the social and

    economic situations, not he cultural

    traits, of the ghetto underclass. He

    moves from that conclusion to propose

    a broad policy offensive based on

    versal employment and training pro-

    grams open to the general public. But

    Wilson supports this view, whichhas its

    merits, by a curious reading of Ameri-

    can history, according which the

    greatest strides in social reform have

    been made not through conflict and

    struggle but when liberals and conser-

    vatives find common ground. (How

    can

    we fit abolition, suffrage, unioniza-

    tion, the New Deal, civil rights or abor

    tion rights into that framework?)

    Most of the components of Wilsons

    implicit agenda seem reasonable enoug

    though he neglects to explain where to

    find the coalition to form such a con-

    sensus. This oversight is not so damn-

    ing; he wiiiuld probably respond by say-

    ing that specific strategies are not his

    job. Moreover, the thrust of this book

    lies not in its policy proposals but in its

    efforts to make public social policy de-

    bate more humane, intellectually honest

    and, careful. Unfortunately, on the latter

    score; despite good intentions and the

    occasional insight or useful fact-e.g,,

    that black een-age pregnancy has not

    been increasing nd,may be in long-term

  • 7/25/2019 "The Liberal Technocrat"- Adolph L. Reed Jr.

    2/5

    168

    The 6 1

    decline- fails

    in several very important ways to break

    with the premises of the Reagan era~dis-

    course on the poor. Thespecific charac-

    ter of this failure is certainly worthy of

    the lefts attention-especially at

    a

    time

    when the term social democrat is be-

    ing applied to everyone who believes in

    Social Security, Medicare and public

    works employment.

    To begin with, Wilsons entire inter-

    pretation springs from the conjunction

    of two disturbing and retrograde em-

    phases, which-surprisingly for such a

    distinguished sociologist-remain unex-

    amined throughout the book. These

    are first, the focus on disorganiza-

    tion,aberration, deviance and

    pathology that has influenced urban

    sociological study at the University of

    Chicago since the days of Robert Park

    and the Americanization movement f

    the World War I eraand, second, a

    deeply patriarchal vision of main-

    stream life.

    When Wilson employs a language

    of

    social pathology, he is implyinga mode

    of social health from which the under-

    classdiverges. What is that model?

    Because he does not state it explicitly,

    we must infer it from his list of aber-

    rant behavioral patterns that suppos-

    edly define the underclass. On

    basis, the healthy mainstream apparent-

    ly is characterized by law-abiding, two-

    parent families nwhichwomenhave

    babies in adulthoo, with

    the

    imprima-

    tur of church and s

    t

    te. Certainly, crime

    and teen pregnancy would be endorsed

    by no sensible person, but why should

    we be concerned with how adult women

    choose to organize their reproductive

    activity and conjugal arrangements?

    Wilson, has a n answer. The problem

    This

    is in

    u 4 1 t m d l

    Name

    lnstltutlon

    ____

    Street

    ____

    State

    University Microfilms International -

    300

    North Zeeb

    30 32Mortmer Street

    Depr P R

    Dept

    P R

    MI 48106

    London WI,N

    England

    When drafting your will,please

    consider making a bequest

    to

    The

    Nation Institute.

    For

    mforrnatlon or call: Sack,

    Director,

    Institute,

    72

    Ave-

    New NY 10011 (212) 242-8400.

    is not that there is anything inherently

    bad about female-headed households,

    but, becausewomen earn lessmoney

    than men, households headed by wom-

    en are more likely than others

    to

    fall

    below the poverty line. One might think

    that pointwould lead him to call for pay

    equity, universal day care and other

    initiatives to buttress womens capacities

    for living ndependently n the world,

    but Wilson goes in exactly the opposite

    direction. He defines the ultimate prob-

    lem as

    a

    shortage of marriageable

    men-going so faras to construct a

    marriageable male pool index-and

    argues for targeting employment and

    training programs primarily at unem-

    ployed young males who will thus be-

    come more attractive as potential

    spouses. (With respect to illegitimacy,

    Wilson, like most underclass theorists,

    makes no distinction between out-of-wed-

    lock births and teen pregnancies, which

    in fact are quite distinct phenomena.)

    For all its apparent ingenuousness,

    this

    view s abominably sexist, not to

    mention atavistic. Indeed, Wilsons very

    definition of the underclass focuses al-

    mosf exclusively on womens behavior.

    If

    it were not forviolent crime,pathol-

    ogy would be recognizable only among

    females.Wilson-like Park and the

    others in the Chicago pantheon-sug-

    gests that the behavioral patterns of the

    poor warrant concern because they re-

    flect social disorganization, and yet that

    argument is undercut by his own insist-

    ence that they are pragmatic responses

    to structuralenvironment. The problem

    is not the social disorganization of the

    innerkcity poor, but Wilsons and oth-

    ers distaste for, and reluctance

    to

    exam-

    ine the institutional and organizational

    forms that the inner-city poor, particu-

    larly women,havedevised to survive

    and

    to

    create meaning and dignity in

    lives bitterly constrained by forces ap-

    parently beyond their control.

    Wilsons reflexive antifeminism and

    commitment

    to

    the language of social

    pathology account for another element

    in his failure to escape the prevailing or-

    thodoxy about poverty. The mainstream

    propriety that he embraces issteeped

    in a nostalgia now prevalent whenever

    black intellectuals discuss the problems

    of the black community. He recalls wist-

    fully the time when lower-class, work-

    ing-class, and middle-class black fami-

    lies all lived more or less in the same

    communities . .

    .

    sent their children to

    the s h e chools, availed themselves of

    the same recreational facilities, and

    shopped at the same stores. He

    members that in the 1940s black

    Harlem couldsleepsafely on fire

    capes n he summer heat and w

    could venture uptown to consume

    ture. The fact is that that safe, org

    community was a more limited, c

    plex and problematic entity than no

    gia would allow,and its glue was no

    much nuclear, intact families as

    imperatives of racial segregation.

    Wilson notes that when the stric

    of racial subordination were relaxe

    blackmiddleclass left the :inner

    bantustans, and tohis credit he,doe

    much indulge in the self-congrst,ula

    prattle, now current among race-

    tions engineers, about the black mi

    classs special responsibility to

    vide role models for thepoor. Yet h

    cycles a related component of that

    talgic deology in asserting a nee

    restore two-parent families wit

    regard to the fact that such a projec

    nores the structural sources of pove

    he describes.Moreover, he seems ob

    ous to the danger that the new con

    with the black family-like the old

    cern with the black family and the o

    concern with the immigrant family

    an empty, moralistic ideology that s

    to stigmatize the poor and enforce p

    archal institutions -by appealing

    past that may have been largely my

    cal anyway, and one that was certa

    predicated on the subordination

    women. This is

    not

    to attack the

    parent family, but family pol

    should enable people to sustain w

    ever sorts of iving arrangements

    find

    most

    congenial-not impose

    a

    sa

    sanct model.

    There is one last problem with W

    sons account, and it has perhaps

    mosteriouslyimiting onsequences

    for his treatment of poverty and pu

    policy and or his broader argum

    about race and economics.

    is uninformed by

    sense of politics as

    a

    factor in the c

    tion and re-creation

    of

    the social w

    Overlooking codified. segregation-

    central issue in black life for two-th

    of a century-in a paean to he

    organic community, proposing a m

    roeconomic dating service rather

    attacking patterns of wage discrim

    tion against women, and reading

    flict out of the history of social ref

    in the U.S. all exemplify his fai

    Most strikingly, though, Wilsons

    rative of the origin of the under

    focuses exclusively on the role of b

  • 7/25/2019 "The Liberal Technocrat"- Adolph L. Reed Jr.

    3/5

    6

    1988

    4 1

    nor they create specific out-

    hey are the products of con-

    human action and in turn create

    agendas. The transformationof

    storical force but by

    combination

    of

    private investment de-

    ns and state action.

    This

    impetus

    that-along with explicitly segrega-

    ities in Federal public hous-

    off minority communi-

    displaced large sectionsof hese

    n expressways, office complexes,

    centers. There lies

    of Wilson's social isolation.''

    Wilson's overview leads him to mis-

    m in the late and to miscon-

    the ole of critics like Bayard

    go beyond race to a

    a broader program of social de-

    ur-

    by placing it within a

    Without a clearsense

    of

    political ac-

    responsibility, Wilson sees only

    In

    only

    human agency he recog-

    is the behavior of the underclass,

    has done anything wrong,

    contradictions abound. the un-

    as a

    contends that the un-

    will witherawayas

    why not define the underclass simply

    nd lack of opportuni-

    seems o lie at the

    of moralistic ideology and patri-

    dressed

    up

    as

    social science.

    failure to consider the political

    of his argument allows Wil-

    s. That also

    a

    weakness

    of

    of because

    of race in the affirmative action ap-

    But

    it is especially inadequate

    discussionof the condition

    of

    the

    Careful examination of

    By dup-

    Because Nordlc-

    Iicatmg the motlon

    of

    cross countr Track is

    so

    effment,

    sklmg, the world's best burn more alories and

    NordlcTrack provides the

    get a better aerobic

    rdeal aeroblc workout.

    workout In less time.

    WNO Run-

    Unlike blkes andther nmg and someerobic

    sltdown exerclsers, workouts canause

    NordlcTrack exercms painful and

    all the body's malor

    muscles a totaI

    body workout.

    .NO No

    In tests at

    a

    other exercise machme

    malor umverslty, NordlcTr bumsore calories than

    burned more calories than

    exercise

    bike

    and a rowmg

    machine?

    With and

    fun

    o

    NordicTrack, you can exercise

    in

    the

    comfort of your home. AND

    NordlcTrack easdy folds, requirmg

    storagepace of only17 23 . 1-800-328- 5888

    In

    141 N , MN55318

    Please send

    Also HS

    17 BETA

    5 1

    THE

    -

    .-

    or In

    a 1

    1 6

    (1

    of

    $7.95, 3 or $21.95, 6

    or

    $39.95.

    $9.95,3 $27.95, or $52 95.

    Ma The Natlon, Industnes, Dept

    N,

    499 E. 191 34

    I hke

    Enclosed IS my $1

    Outslde

    U S.

    2

    50 unlt.

    accepted $1

    5. To

    charge toll 1-800-972-5858

    .

    Name

    NO P

    0

    City

    . U S 6% tax

    IP

    ~

    1

    Now can

    rent

    VHS

    or Beta

    video-

    tapes

    by

    mad of

    over

    700

    hard-to-find

    mcludmgdqutrre

    of

    God

    8%

    Or-

    Closely My ~

    Than

    tiful

    and

    Our ever-expandmg library mcludes fo

    and mdependentfilms, h t e d elease

    features, Hollywood classlcs, favontes

    and documentanes

    Members slmply order toefree, and

    receive cassettes

    by m a l

    or UPS.

    dscount

    on

    members' wdeotape

    chases.

    It's

    simpleand nexpenswe Phone or

    wnte

    for

    free nfomho n and a of

    i 1-800-633-FILM)

    Festival

    Videotape Rentals by

    Mad

    P.O. Box

    2032,

    Scranton,

    185 1

  • 7/25/2019 "The Liberal Technocrat"- Adolph L. Reed Jr.

    4/5

    170 Nation.

    Februarv 6

    makes it impossible to distinguish pure-

    ly racial from purely economic impera-

    tives. Heavily black or Hispanic labor

    markets are assumed to be plagued by

    low skill levels nd poor work habits;

    parcels of land occupied by minorities

    are underutilized and ripe for redevel-

    opment because the presencef minority

    populations lowers market value. Wilson

    himself notes that numbers of low-

    skill jobs havebeenncreasing na-

    tionally butnot irn those cities where

    minorities are concentrated. In this con-

    text the race/class debate is beside the

    point. I t forgets that the logic of mar-

    kets isocially and politically con-

    structed and that race enters into social

    and economic life in complex and indi-

    rect ways. While the idea

    of

    institu-

    tional racism is probably an

    ron, racial subordination is reproduced

    through he impersonal operations of

    markets-with or without activedis-

    crimination. Wilson rightly notes that

    racism-a notion that implies individu-

    al instances of prejudice and discrimina-

    tion-does not explain the condition of

    the underclass; however, like his antag-

    onists he acceptsa view that sees only

    the alternatives

    of

    explicit racial dis-

    olicy

    Essential reading

    from

    Columbia.

    of

    of

    -

    368 $35 00

    ~.

    AND

    and Moral

    I .~ .

    1 .

    ~ ( ,

    1 - 1 . -

    a

    by

    127 $30.00

    A

    , .

    ,.. I C.

    BEHAVIOR IN

    THE

    A

    .

    .

    as

    well

    Loren Carl

    565 00

    .

    H.

    of

    gies,

    In

    thls

    for of

    care on

    288

    00

    wcoLuMs~u~Rsmr~

    136 South NY 10533

    crimination and race-blind stru

    forces as explanations for black

    nomic subordination. This is in pa

    cause Wilson cannot see that hist

    made by human action. Contrary

    imputations of some of his propo

    on the left, Wilsons argument doe

    juxtapose race and class but race

    whichhe treats as be

    the scope of social intervention.

    -

    Finally,

    an instructive text for the left as we

    the end of Reaganism and, we hop

    proach the empowerment of a l

    Democratic regime. Wilson ex5mp

    the limits of the liberal technocka

    sion. ultimate concern is nut

    durable patterns of dispossessio

    stratification but with apparentl

    cidental roadblocks to equal\oppo

    ty. Thus, he separates joblessnes

    poverty in a way that often eems b

    At bottom his viewseems to be

    poverty is acceptable (if palliate

    maintenance programs) as long a

    portunities exist for joining the up

    mobility queue.

    But what if there

    is

    no upward m

    ity queue-or at least not one eith

    enough to accommodate the large p

    lations of blacks and

    panics or -sturdy enough

    to

    with

    the dynamics of racial and class s

    dination? The economy is not ne

    with respect to those dynamics. R

    its inner logic-driven by concrete

    choices-works-systematically to

    centrate benefits among some gro

    costs

    among

    others. Blacks, for exa

    arenot new migrants who s

    happened to show up in cities too

    indeed, they have occupied the bo

    of the urban social order througho

    twentieth century.

    Much of Wilsons omnibus socia

    gram for jobs andraining is, unde

    sent circumstances, a practical first

    However, his bias against politic

    conflict short-circuits his interpret

    of the systemic sources of the unde

    and threatens to keep everything i

    bile while we wait for liberals and

    servatives to form a consensus. In

    tion, although hisviewof inne

    poverty is some improvement over

    of those available in public deba

    cently, his habit of seeing the poor

    ly as objects of administrative a

    leads him to adopt,he language of

    al repressiveness and patriarchy.

    result, he cannot really free himse

    the antidemocratic, Reaganite fram

    reference.

    = . .

  • 7/25/2019 "The Liberal Technocrat"- Adolph L. Reed Jr.

    5/5