the law of consent tara jugessur. four arenas of nurse accountability nurse public criminal law...
TRANSCRIPT
The law of Consent
Tara Jugessur
Four arenas of nurse accountability
Nurse
PUBLICCriminal law
PATIENTCivil law
EMPLOYERContract of employment
PROFESSIONALNMC Code of conduct
From Dimond (2002) Legal aspects of nursing. 3rd edition
Consent
Basic principles Validity of consent Forms of consent (How should
consent be given) Does the patient have capacity to
consent Factors affecting consent Has the patient received sufficient
information prior to consent
Law of Trespass
Assault Battery
Where patient fears that where the patient is
he Will be touched actually touched
Basic principles
Adult mentally competent persons have right in law to consent to being touched
Touching without consent means person can sue for trespass in civil court
Duty of care means consent must be informed
How should consent be given?
Consent
ImpliedExpress
In writing Word of mouth
Forms of Consent Patients can indicate their informed consent either orally or in
writing. In some cases, the nature of the risks to which the patient might be exposed make it important that a written record is available of the patient's consent and other wishes in relation to the proposed investigation and treatment. This helps to ensure later understanding between you, the patient, and anyone else involved in carrying out the procedure or providing care. Except in an emergency, where the patient has capacity to give consent you should obtain written consent in cases where:
the treatment or procedure is complex, or involves significant risks and/or side effects;
providing clinical care is not the primary purpose of the investigation or examination;
there may be significant consequences for the patient's employment, social or personal life;
the treatment is part of a research programme.
Validity of consent Assessing competence
Four standards in the person giving consent
1. Mental competence 2. Sufficient information3. Sufficient understanding to make a reasoned choice4. Voluntariness and autonomy
5. These are also four standards to assess 6. in the people asking for consent
consent
Who seek consent When should consent be sought Duration of consent Refusal of consent Withdrawal of consent Advanced refusal of consent Capacity act 2005
How should consent be given Four levels of decision making
1. To be informed
2. To form and express views.
3. To influence a decision.
4. To be the main decider about proposed treatment or care.
Consent (continued)
Consent in relation to children Consent and mental disorder Consent and the elderly Consent in relation to surgery Consent in relation to AIDS & HIV Consent and drug trial, research, trial
treatment
Informed consent Informed consent involves knowing about the intervention’s:
* purpose, nature and duration * methods and means * hoped for benefits * harms, costs and risks * alternatives * effects on health and person
Informed consent Informed consent involves knowing the patients’ right to:
* discuss questions have time to consider have access to parents have respect for confidentiality have written information have a named contact refuse, withdraw from treatment without prejudice * signify consent
Informed Consent Patients have a right to information about their
condition and the treatment options available to them. The amount of information you give each patient will vary, according to factors such as the nature of the condition, the complexity of the treatment, the risks associated with the treatment or procedure, and the patient's own wishes. For example, patients may need more information to make an informed decision about a procedure which carries a high risk of failure or adverse side effects; or about an investigation for a condition which, if present, could have serious implications for the patient's employment, social or personal life
Emergencies In an emergency, where consent cannot be
obtained, you may provide medical treatment to anyone who needs it, provided the treatment is limited to what is immediately necessary to save life or avoid significant deterioration in the patient's health. However, you must still respect the terms of any valid advance refusal which you know about, or is drawn to your attention. You should tell the patient what has been done, and why, as soon as the patient is sufficiently recovered to understand.
'Best interests' principle
In deciding what options may be reasonably considered as being in the bestinterests of a patient who lacks capacity to decide, you should take into
account: options for treatment or investigation which are clinically indicated; any evidence of the patient's previously expressed preferences,
including an advance statement; your own and the health care team's knowledge of the patient's
background, such as cultural, religious, or employment considerations; views about the patient's preferences given by a third party who
may have other knowledge of the patient, for example the patient's partner, family, carer, tutor-dative (Scotland), or a person with parental responsibility;
which option least restricts the patient's future choices, where more than one option (including non-treatment) seems reasonable in the patient's best interest.
Mentally incapacitated patients
No-one can give or withhold consent to treatment on behalf of a mentally incapacitated patient. You must first assess the patient's capacity to make an informed decision about the treatment. If patients lack capacity to decide, provided they comply, you may carry out an investigation or treatment, which may include treatment for any mental disorder, that you judge to be in their best interests. However, if they do not comply, you may compulsorily treat them for any mental disorder only within the safeguards laid down by the Mental Health Act 1983, and any physical disorder arising from that mental disorder, in line with the guidance in the Code of Practice of the Mental Health Commission. You should seek the courts' approval for any non-therapeutic or controversial treatments which are not directed at their mental disorder.
Minor and consent
16-18 years
Under 16 mature minor (competence, capacity)
Under 16 Immature minor (lack competence)
Minor 16-18 years
Family Reform Act 1969 Children's Act 1989, 2004
People aged 16 0r 17 are entitled to consent to procedures……
However, unlike adults they have no rights to refuse treatment
Children (minor) under 16
Gillick competence / Fraser Guidelines
Children under 16 who have sufficient understanding and intelligence to enable them to understand fully will have the capacity to consent……
Gillick VsWest Norfolk & Wisbech AHA (1986)
Children
You must assess a child's capacity to decide whether to consent to or refuse proposed investigation or treatment before you provide it. In general, a competent child will be able to understand the nature, purpose and possible consequences of the proposed investigation or treatment, as well as the consequences of non-treatment. Your assessment must take account of the relevant laws or legal precedents in this area. You should bear in mind that:
at age 16 a young person can be treated as an adult and can be presumed to have capacity to decide;
under age 16 children may have capacity to decide, depending on their ability to understand what is involved.
where a competent child refuses treatment, a person with parental responsibility or the court may authorise investigation or treatment which is in the child's best interests. The position is different in Scotland, where those with parental responsibility cannot authorise procedures a competent child has refused. Legal advice may be helpful on how to deal with such cases.
Children and Consent to Treatment and Testing: Some Key Legislation
England & Wales Family Law Reform Act 1969 Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech AHA [1985],
3 AER 402 Children Act 1989, 2004 Scotland Age of Legal Capacity (Scotland) Act 1991 Children Act (Scotland) 1995, Section 6, Part 1. Northern Ireland Age of Majority Act 1969, Section 4.
Advance statements
If you are treating a patient who has lost capacity to consent to or refuse treatment, for example through onset or progress of a mental disorder or other disability, you should try to find out whether the patient has previously indicated preferences in an advance statement ('advance directives' or 'living wills'). You must respect any refusal of treatment given when the patient was competent, provided the decision in the advance statement is clearly applicable to the present circumstances, and there is no reason to believe that the patient has changed his/her mind. Where an advance statement of this kind is not available, the patient's known wishes should be taken into account -
Applying to the court
Where a patient's capacity to consent is in doubt, or where differences of opinion about his or her best interests cannot be resolved satisfactorily, you should consult more experienced colleagues and, where appropriate, seek legal advice on whether it is necessary to apply to the court for a ruling. You should seek the court's approval where a patient lacks capacity to consent to a medical intervention which is non-therapeutic or controversial, for example contraceptive sterilisation, organ donation, withdrawal of life support from a patient in a persistent vegetative state. Where you decide to apply to a court you should, as soon as possible, inform the patient and his or her representative of your decision and of his or her right to be represented at the hearing.
Consent to screening Screening (which may involve testing) healthy or asymptomatic people to
detect genetic predispositions or early signs of debilitating or life threatening conditions can be an important tool in providing effective care. But the uncertainties involved in screening may be great, for example the risk of false positive or false negative results. Some findings may potentially have serious medical, social or financial consequences not only for the individuals, but for their relatives. In some cases the fact of having been screened may itself have serious implications.
You must ensure that anyone considering whether to consent to screening can make a properly informed decision. As far as possible, you should ensure that screening would not be contrary to the individual's interest. You must pay particular attention to ensuring that the information the person wants or ought to have is identified and provided. You should be careful to explain clearly:
the purpose of the screening; the likelihood of positive/negative findings and possibility of false
positive/negative results; the uncertainties and risks attached to the screening process; any significant medical, social or financial implications of screening for
the particular condition or predisposition; follow up plans, including availability of counselling and support services.
Research Research involving clinical trials of drugs or treatments, and
research into the causes of, or possible treatment for, a particular condition, is important in increasing doctors' ability to provide effective care for present and future patients. The benefits of the research may, however, be uncertain and may not be experienced by the person participating in the research. In addition, the risk involved for research participants may be difficult to identify or to assess in advance. If you carry out or participate in research involving patients or volunteers, it is particularly important that you ensure:
as far as you are able, that the research is not contrary to the individual's interests;
that participants understand that it is research and that the results are not predictable.
Mental Capacity Act 2005
Tara Jugessur
Cardiff University
Mental Capacity Act 2005 received Royal Assent on 7 April 2005
The Mental Capacity Act 2005 provides a statutory framework to empower and protect vulnerable people who are not able to make their own decisions. It makes it clear who can take decisions, in which situations, and how they should go about this. It enables people to plan ahead for a time when they may lose capacity.
What does the Mental Capacity Act do?
The Act governs decision-making on behalf of adults who lack mental capacity, both where they lose capacity at some point in their lives, and where the incapacitating condition has been present since birth.
It covers all decisions, including personal welfare and financial matters, and covers decision-making on their behalf by attorneys, or court-appointed "deputies". It also clarifies the position if formal process has not been adopted.
Mental Capacity Act 2005 It makes new law governing the way in which
decisions are made on behalf of people who lack mental capacity.
The MCA includes provision for advance decisions to refuse treatment. It extends powers of attorney so that they can apply to decisions in relation to donors’ health and welfare, as well as their finances.
It also sets a framework to assess the best interests of a patient who lacks capacity, together with provision relating to medical research. It introduces new criminal offences of neglect and ill-treatment of people who lack capacity.
Why do we need this Act?
The current law on decision-making for adults who lack capacity has evolved bit by bit.
Existing attorneys or receivers only make decisions on financial matters.
The Act provides clarity about who can make decisions and how to do it. It protects vulnerable people, carers and professionals
Who will this legislation help?
Millions of people - including those who lack capacity, the estimated 6 million people who care for them and professionals who have contact with them. It will also help those who wish to prepare for a time when they might lose capacity.
The whole Act is underpinned by a set of five key principles (1)
A presumption of capacity
every adult has the right to make his or her own decisions and must be assumed to have capacity to do so unless it is proved otherwise
The whole Act is underpinned by a set of five key principles (2)
The right for individuals to be supported to make their own decisions
people must be given all appropriate help before anyone concludes that they cannot make their own decisions
The whole Act is underpinned by a set of five key principles (3)
That individuals must retain the right to make what might be seen as eccentric or unwise decisions
The whole Act is underpinned by a set of five key principles (4)
Best interests
anything done for or on behalf of people without capacity must be in their best interests
The whole Act is underpinned by a set of five key principles (5)
Least restrictive intervention anything done for or on behalf of
people without capacity should be the least restrictive of their basic rights and freedoms.
The Act is particularly significant in two ways relevant to consent to medical management:
For the first time the Act allows consent to be given or withheld, for the medical treatment of patients who lack capacity, by another person (typically a close relative).
It provides, again for the first time, for statutory recognition of ‘advance directive’ These are statements made by a person whilst competent (i.e. whilst having legal capacity) about the treatment that she would want, or not want, in specified situations, in the future were she to lack capacity at the time the treatment would be relevant
Minor under 16 years
The Act is not relevant if the patient is under 16 years old
Definition of incapacity
a person is unable to make a decision for himself if he is unable to:
(a) to understand the information relevant to the decision,
(b) to retain that information, (c) to use or weigh that information as part of the
process of making the decision, or d) to communicate his decision (whether by talking,
using sign language or any other means)… The fact that a person is able to retain the information
relevant to a decision for a short period only does not prevent him from being regarded as able to make the decision.
The Act also includes three further key provisions to protect vulnerable people
Independent Mental Capacity Advocate (IMCA)
Advance decisions to refuse treatment
A criminal offence
Independent Mental Capacity Advocate (IMCA)
An IMCA is someone appointed to support a person who lacks capacity but has no one to speak for them.
The IMCA makes representations about the person’s wishes, feelings, beliefs and values, at the same time as bringing to the attention of the decision-maker all factors that are relevant to the decision.
The IMCA can challenge the decision-maker on behalf of the person lacking capacity if necessary.
What is an independent mental capacity advocate (IMCA)?
When a person who lacks mental capacity has to make a serious decision about treatment or where they live, an independent mental capacity advocate (IMCA) is appointed to support and represent them.
The IMCA voices the person's wishes, feelings, beliefs and values and they make the decision maker aware of all relevant information. They can also challenge the decision maker.
Who gets an independent mental capacity advocate (IMCA)?
An IMCA will be provided when someone with no friends or family to support them, is faced with a decision about a serious medical treatment or their accommodation.
The Government has made a clear commitment to consult with external partners on extending the service to other groups and situations.
Advance decisions to refuse treatment
Statutory rules with clear safeguards to help people make a decision in advance to refuse treatment if they should lose capacity in the future.
It is made clear in the Act that an advance decision will have no application to any treatment which a doctor considers necessary to sustain life unless strict formalities have been complied with. These formalities are that the decision must be in writing, signed and witnessed. In addition, there must be an express statement that the decision stands “even if life is at risk”.
What is a Lasting Power of Attorney (LPA)?
A Lasting Power of Attorney (LPA) is a new statutory form of power of attorney created by the Mental Capacity Act.
Anyone who has capacity to do so may choose a person (an "attorney") to take decisions on their behalf if they subsequently lose capacity.
The LPA will replace the Enduring Power of Attorney (EPA) currently provided for by the Enduring Powers of Attorney Act 1985. Unlike an EPA, an LPA can extend to personal welfare matters as well as property and affairs.
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs)
The Act allows a person to appoint an attorney to act on their behalf if they should lose capacity in the future.
This is like the current Enduring Power of Attorney (EPA), but the Act also allows people to let an attorney make health and welfare decisions.
A criminal offence
The Bill introduces a new criminal offence of ill treatment or neglect of a person who lacks capacity. A person found guilty of such an offence may be liable to imprisonment for a term of up to five years.
Court appointed deputies
The Act provides for a system of court appointed deputies
Deputies will be able to take decisions on welfare, healthcare and financial matters as authorised by the Court but will not be able to refuse consent to life-sustaining treatment. They will only be appointed if the Court cannot make a one-off decision to resolve the issues.