the jisc e-learning framework
DESCRIPTION
The JISC e-learning framework. Sarah Porter, Head of Development, JISC and Scott Wilson, Centre for Educational Technology Interoperability Standards. JISC Strategic Aims. To enable UK education and research to keep their activities world-class through the innovative use of ICT - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Supporting further and higher education
The JISC e-learning framework
Sarah Porter, Head of Development, JISC
and Scott Wilson, Centre for Educational Technology Interoperability Standards
Supporting further and higher education
JISC Strategic Aims
• To enable UK education and research to keep their activities world-class through the innovative use of ICT
• To provide advice to institutions enabling them to make economic, efficient and legally compliant use of ICT
• To help the sector provide a positive, personalised user experience
• To develop mutually advantageous partnerships with organisations in the UK and abroad
• To advise, inform and implement the strategies of government, funding councils and research councils.
Supporting further and higher education
JISC’s Activities
Supporting further and higher education
A ride in the TARDIS …
A typical college or University in 1984
• Limited use of computers for specialist applications• No widespread internet, LANs, graphical user
interfaces• Few desk-top PCs• Mostly paper-based financial systems,
administrative systems• Limited computerised library catalogues• Limited interest in computers• Very few ‘users’!
Supporting further and higher education
Brave New World 2005
• Look how far we’ve come …• Substantial proportion of capital and recurrent budgets
spent on ICT• Every learner, teacher and researcher has access to a
computer• Some new processes
– Communication by email obligatory in some organisations
• Multiple systems for administration, resource management, digital resources, teaching, research, etc …
• E-learning increasingly popular, but quality variable; ‘best’ models unclear
Supporting further and higher education
Key questions
• Where are we going with e-learning?
• Are we in control?
• Who should be in control– Teacher– Learner– ‘experts’?
Supporting further and higher education
Questions
• Complex relationship between people and technology– Is technology changing practice?– Is it improving learning experiences for
students?– Do we have the balance right – is
technology driving practice or is practice limiting technology?
Supporting further and higher education
Supporting further and higher education
Is technology changing practice?
• Practice has been changed: systemic use of technologies
• Large scale use of ‘accepted’ technologies e.g. commercial VLEs
• Approaches to encouraging use, staff development, sharing practice
• Using one system in systemic way has implications for lots of other systems and processes– E.g. SMS server needs to interoperate with library
system
Supporting further and higher education
Innovation
• ‘Technology doesn’t just allow students to answers questions more quickly, but to ask new questions’ (Vijay Kumar)
• Mobile technologies allow ‘populist and personal approach’ (Terry Keefe)
Supporting further and higher education
Key issues
–Creativity
–Choice
Supporting further and higher education
Questions for you
• Who has a VLE or LMS?
• Which?
• Are you considering changing it in the next 3 years?
• Why?
(5 mins)
Supporting further and higher education
JISC activities 1999-2004
• To explore the concept of Managed Learning Environments (MLEs)
• To share effective practice• Managed Learning Environment programmes
– Programmes in UK Higher Ed, Further Ed, across sectors
• Awareness-raising; guides to good practice (MLE InfoKit)
• Surveys and studiesAdvisory service (JISC InfoNet)
Quality Process
BusinessSystems
LearningResources
CurriculumMapping
Assessment
Communication
Delivery
TutorSupport
Tracking
OtherAgencies
OtherColleges
Virtual Learning Environment
Managed Learning Environment
Student Record System
Off-LineLearning
Registers
Reproduced by kind permission of BECTa
???
?
?
?
?
Supporting further and higher education
JISC interoperability projects (1999 – 2003)
• Lots of projects funded under MLE programmes to integrate systems to support business functions– E-learning– Management of student information– Collaboration with other organisations
• Content-oriented projects were generally successful
• Integration projects were generally less successful
• Where integration projects were successful, they were not repeatable outside the project
Supporting further and higher education
Why unrepeatable?
• Various projects along lines of “Integrate System X with System Y”
• Eventually everything talks to everything else?
• But actually “Integrate X with Y in environment Z”
• So even replicating a previous pairwise integration often meant starting from scratch (c.f. Scotland Wales and Northern Ireland programme)
Supporting further and higher education
JISC e-Learning Programme
• eLearning and pedagogy– Guide to Effective Practice published recently
– Numerous studies
– Beetham article in March 2005 ALT-J
• Technical framework and tools• Innovative technologies• Distributed eLearning (regional projects for FE/HE)• Coherent activities that fit together and inform each other
– Bringing together technologists and practitioners– Using short-term projects to test and develop and feed
back into new phases of activity
Supporting further and higher education
E-learning programme
Sequence of learning activities (learning design)
Learner Organisation may be local, regional or national
Teacher sets up activities after discussion with learner(s)
portfolio
profile
Learning resources
Accredits learner
assessment
Learning activity Learning activityLearning activity Learning activityLearning activity
Model to inform e-learning programme
MLEs for LLL
E-learning and pedagogy
X4L
Technical interface between as many systems as possible (Frameworks)
Supporting further and higher education
What is the JISC framework?
• A service-oriented analysis of the educational problem space
• Backed up with technical specifications, development projects, and toolkits
• A place for the partners to work together, to identify issues, opportunities, priorities
• A palette from which to select service definitions and locate tools and expertise to support implementation
• A model and methodology for planning systems integration.
Supporting further and higher education
ELF Today
Supporting further and higher education
How will it be used?
• Three ‘faces’:– Planning and strategy– Standards, service descriptions and
protocols– Tools and projects
Supporting further and higher education
Why create a framework for linking systems?
• Black-box solutions for e-learning are inflexible and difficult to adapt to their context
• What we thought would be basic integration tasks have often proved intractable and expensive, with solutions that are unrepeatable
• Duplication and waste in development efforts, and difficulty in exploiting development outputs outside the incubation projects
Supporting further and higher education
Objectives
• New synergies from the combination of tools and functions
• Efficiencies gained from linking together processes and using automation
• Flexibility in the configuration of functions to match our objectives and priorities, strategic and pedagogic
Supporting further and higher education
What does this mean for e-learning?
– Moving away from single large-scale systems to give users more choice
– Easier use and re-use of ‘content’ (may include e-portfolios, learning objects, research resources …) between systems
– More choice for learners; more creativity for teachers?
Supporting further and higher education
Video clip
Supporting further and higher education
• ‘integrate into schemes of work’• ‘Be very sure that the whole class is contributing, record their
activities’• ‘important that they can reflect on their learning at the end of a
session’• ‘couldn’t replicate that kind of learning environment any other way
…within an hour’s lesson’• ‘Enables the students to take more of an active role in their
learning process’• ‘Will improve their discussion skills and consequently their learning’• ‘With good teachers, LAMS can actually, we think, have a real
impact’• ‘Different opinions from different people’• ‘You can talk to other pupils about what YOU think’
Supporting further and higher education
Tara Brabazon, Digital Hemlock
• ‘Teaching well is ruthlessly corrosive of innovation’
Digital Hemlock: Internet education and the poisoning of teaching (2004) Tara Brabazon
Supporting further and higher education
Questions for you
• Do your current systems allow your learners and teachers (or yourself) to be as creative as you would like?
• Do they offer the right amount of choice?
Supporting further and higher education
International Frameworks’ programme
• Builds upon other, similar efforts, such as the IMS Abstract Framework, MIT’s Open Knowledge Initiative, Sun eLearning Architecture, work of the Carnegie Mellon Learning Systems Architecture Laboratory etc.
• Collecting together agreements on, and experiences of, using services into a common structure.
• Partnership between the JISC and the Department of Education, Science and Training, Australia
• Other contributors from US and Canada• Lots of interest from other countries, esp. Canada and
New Zealand and the European Commission
Supporting further and higher education
Desirable outcomes
• Flexible solutions that can be suited to individual institutions without causing interoperability problems
• Integration that is affordable and repeatable
• Research and development outcomes that can be shared outside their incubator projects
Supporting further and higher education
Supporting further and higher education
Integration Choices
• So how can we achieve integration?
• What does each approach afford us?
• Well, there are some common patterns…
Supporting further and higher education
Information Portal
• Aggregate information from multiple sources into a single display
• Display divided into multiple zones each displaying information from different system
• Limited interaction between zones
• Enables ‘shallow’ rather than ‘deep’ integration
Supporting further and higher education
Data Replication: Enterprise Application
Integration• Data is replicated
between multiple systems
• Business logic and presentation remains independent
• Typical VLE / LMS linked to Management Information Systems scenario
• Not very flexible
Supporting further and higher education
Service Oriented Architecture
• Presentation and workflow constructed from multiple shared services
• Data and business function encapsulated in services
• Also known as “Enterprise service bus” architecture
Supporting further and higher education
Data Warehouse
• Integrate many data sources to provide enterprise-wide reporting
• Business and presentation remain independent
• Strategic but not operational integration
Supporting further and higher education
Mix and match: Service Oriented Architecture
Portal• Using a Service
Oriented Architecture to implement teaching and administration workflows as Distributed Business Processes, presented using an Information Portal
Supporting further and higher education
Service Orientation
• A popular way to look at systems integration• Concentrates on contracts between service
Providers and service Consumers• Separates service from implementation• Many functions within an e-learning system
can be ‘exported’ to services offered by the environment to applications
Supporting further and higher education
Benefits
• Platform vendor buy-in, with plenty of class libraries and infrastructure ‘pieces’
• Lends itself easily to abstraction• Enables flexibility, even with legacy assets
(e.g. management information systems)• Neutral with regard to platforms and
languages• Relatively intuitive
Supporting further and higher education
Frameworks
• Some critieria for a successful framework:– Must be based on practical experience– Must evolve in response to experiences and
reflection– Must support partial implementation and not
require complete adoption of the whole framework to achieve anything
– Must not mandate a single development environment (e.g.Java)
– Must support a range of implementation patterns and as wide a variety of designs as possible
Supporting further and higher education
Myths and misconceptions
• The Framework is an open-source VLE or LMS– The ELF provides a framework that can help when
developing any kind of e-learning application, commercial or open-source
• Using ELF means buying all new Web Services-capable systems– SOA enables existing investments in systems to be
used, regardless of their platform, by exposing functions as services
• ELF will give you everything you need– You still need applications– Workflow? Security? Management?
Supporting further and higher education
Old World Brave new World
Interaction
mode Browser Anything
Connection
mode
Always-on Always on or partially
connected, depending on inter-
action mode used
Structuring
device
Module/course Whatever works for you -time,
topic, popularity,level, people
Structural
affordance
You get to choose which tools
show up in your course area in
the VLE
You have complete freedom to
select promote and demote
whatever tools are available,
and how you connect them to
the structure
Workflow Sequencing is either non-
existent or limited to primitive
show- and-hide, and roles are
built- in along "teacher" and
"student" lines. Typically the
same workflow is offered to all
learners
You can make up your own
rules, roles, sequencing, and
processes, and perhaps change
them later on, even while an
activity is running. Workflows
can be created on a group or
individual level.
Supporting further and higher education
ELF Today
Supporting further and higher education
What are Services?
• Functionally discrete patterns– Scope and definition– Patterns of implementation
• Port definitions– Abstract contract (UML)– API– Service bindings (WSDL, XML-RPC,
HTTP+XML…)
Supporting further and higher education
Learning Domain Services
• Functions that at the moment seem unique to the learning and teaching domain
• Each function expressed as a service analysis, with links to specification and R&D activity
• Eventually, each service will have toolkits, specifications and implementation patterns
Supporting further and higher education
Learning Domain Services
Supporting further and higher education
Common Services
• Functions that at this time seem to be shared by other domains, such as IT services, information environment, and e-science
• Effort may be lead by the e-learning sector, follow efforts lead by other sectors, or investigate in collaboration
Supporting further and higher education
Supporting further and higher education
Common Services
• Wide range of functions: administrative, collaboration, information management, and some core middleware functions
• List is being discussed and refined through consultation with those supporting other business functions e.g. research, administration, Grid technologies
Supporting further and higher education
What are the bricks?
• Each ‘brick’ represents a discrete set of functions that can be exposed within an environment, so that applications such as authoring tools, learning tools etc can make use of them
• Each ‘brick’ defines one or more service ports
Supporting further and higher education
Standards
• Standards already exist for some services• Where standards do exist, they aren’t
always suited to a service-oriented approach
• Standards don’t exist for many services• Where standards don’t exist, there may be
insufficient experience yet to create them
Supporting further and higher education
What isn’t on the ELF diagram?
• Applications - there are no applications here. Just services that support applications
• ‘Fabric’ - some things are common to a whole swathe of services and cannot be easily encapsulated into discrete functions– Workflow– Security– Management
Supporting further and higher education
Workflow
• How services fit within a flow of activity• How services need to be able to respond
to flows of action (‘workflow-aware’)• Some services need pretty complex
workflow behaviour:– Activation– Closedown– Monitoring– Intervention
• BPEL4WS, IMS Learning Design(?)…
Supporting further and higher education
Challenges Ahead
• We’ve made a pretty good start
• There’s a lot of work we could do - but what would be really useful?
Supporting further and higher education
ELF plans
• Identify the most critical services
• Build toolkits
• Develop capacity
• Demonstrate practical use
• Contribute to standards
• Work with the developer community - both commercial vendors and open source
Supporting further and higher education
Toolkits and demonstrators
• Developed a range of web service toolkits for integration of some functions
• Will be tested through ‘demonstrator’ projects during 2005
• Second phase of toolkits under development
• See
Supporting further and higher education
Challenges
• Get the basic technology right– Make things simple, but not simplistic– Enable different levels of technical
sophistication, from very easy HTTP+XML to very tricky SOAP+WS-* as needed
• Show some of this stuff really working– Compelling and interesting demonstrators– Persuading vendors and OSS projects to
take advantage of ELF toolkits
Supporting further and higher education
Challenges (cont’d)
• Communicate the ideas– Developers mostly get it … some managers get
it… but a lot of people don’t
• Get the factoring of services right– Need for community involvement in getting broad
consensus
• Start working on the hard problems– Security, workflow, management are all issues
that aren’t going away!
Supporting further and higher education
How will we know if we have succeeded?
• Deployment within institutions leads to:• More choice for learners and teachers
– More appropriate use of technology
• More options for technologist and developers• Less redundancy, better value from systems• Active engagement of open source
community and commercial companies.
Supporting further and higher education
Sources of information
• JISC e-learning web site– www.elearning.ac.uk
• E-learning framework web site– www.elframework.org
• Email: [email protected] or [email protected]