the influence of non-resonant perturbation fields: modelling results and proposals for textor...
DESCRIPTION
Ultimate limit to maximum N is external kink mode External kink mode can be stabilised by ideal walls n·B| wall = 0 For optimised current profiles (avoid double low order rational surfaces of same helicity)TRANSCRIPT
The influence of non-resonant perturbation fields: Modelling results and
Proposals for TEXTOR experiments
S. Günter, V. Igochine, K. Lackner, Q. YuIPP Garching
• Resistive wall modes and error field amplification• Error field amplification and plasma rotation• Suppression of neoclassical tearing modes by external helical fields
Concept of advanced tokamaks
Non-monotonic current profile
Turbulence suppression
high pressure gradients
large bootstrap current
fBS= N A q 0.8 … 0.9
N 4 … 5
MHD stability ?
Ultimate limit to maximum N is external kink mode
External kink mode can be stabilised by ideal walls
n·B|wall = 0
n·B|wall = 0
For optimised current profiles(avoid double low order rational surfaces of same helicity)
Günter et al., NF 2000
External kink mode in AUG advanced scenarios
Closeness to rational qa destabilising Good agreement between theory and experiment
eigenfunction
Stabilising influence of an ideal conducting wall
Closed wall in distance rw from plasma can be strongly stabilising, especially for:
- broad current and pressure profiles- strong shaping of plasma cross section
3d geometry of ideally conducting walls
CAS3D: First code dealing with 3D wall and 3D plasma:
Destabilising effect of wall resistivity: RWMs
Garofalo et al., PRL 1999
Simple model for RWMs and error field amplification
Fitzpatrick´s (PoP 9(2002) 3459) analytical (inertial layer) model
: stability parameter >0: ideal kink mode stabilised by infinitely conducting wall<0: in absence of rotation plasma is stable
Plasma rotation
Instability driveof plasma mode increases
Effect of rotation for varying wall distance
a rw
rw
ideal („plasma“) mode unstable
detailed shape of marginal curve depends on plasma (dissipation) model
torque balance between mirror current forces and viscous drag (or inertia) determines mode rotation frequency
can be modified by:- distance of wall (0 < <1) at given instability drive
d/dc
increasing wall distance reduces coupling, perturbation can start slipping with respect to wall rotation stabilizes mode
Re() [wall frame]
Effect of rotation for varying instability drive
can be modified by:- variation of the MHD instability drive at given wall distance
rotation destabilizes plasma in MHD stable region:
electromagnetic coupling to wall opens relative velocity plasma-wall to Kelvin-Helmholtz drive (inertia needed)
marginal curve corresponds to error field amplification condition (resistive wall mode can be interpreted to error field amplification of the induced wall-current field)
more unstable plasma has larger ratio of field amplitude in plasma to wall => reduced wall coupling allows slip and rotational stabilization
Numerical treatment of RWMs anderror field amplification
In realistic geometry (coupling to internal resonances):
• MARS (Bondeson)
• VALEN (Bialek, Boozer)
• CASTOR-A (Holties, Kerner)
- response to frequency dependent external perturbation field - modified to include differential plasma rotation, viscosity- resistive wall included (so far high resistivity only)
Numerical results: Error field amplification
Here for comparison with simple analytical theory:• frequency dependent external (3,1) perturbation field (qa < 3)• no internal resonances, no viscosity
Re P
jant B cos ~
(torque onto plasma)
1/
towards marginal stability
Increasing wall distance
1/
/ A
0 0.01 0.02 0.03
Change in plasma stability by varying distance of ideally conducting wall
Numerical results: Error field amplification
Good agreement with analytical model for ideal plasma (scan in wall distance)
~
Maximum of absorbed power
Here for comparison with simple analytical theory:• frequency dependent external (3,1) perturbation field (qa < 3)• no internal resonances, no viscosity
-W~2pl
Numerical results: Error field amplification
Good agreement with analytical model for ideal plasma (scan in N)
Maximum of absorbed power
Here for comparison with simple analytical theory:• frequency dependent external (3,1) perturbation field (qa < 3)• no internal resonances, no viscosity
Numerical results: torque on plasma
Re P
jant B cos ~tor
Torque on the plasma due to external error fields:
1/
~
Maximum torque
Influence of error fields on plasma rotation
reduction in resonant frequency,increasing torque
increase in , mode growth reduction in plasma frequency
59223Saddle current[A]
3.4li
N(%)
br(0o)
br(90o)
Signal which sees no vacuum (or low N) pick-up clearly rises as approaches ideal limit
PNBI[MW]
NB due to low field Bt=1T and high NBI alfven~ 4%
Experiments on error field amplification on JET
Influence of error fields on plasma rotation
Proposals for error field amplification experiments on TEXTOR – comparisons with theory
Frequency dependence in error field amplification:
• discharges with qa<3 (and qa>3 for comparison), low li• scan in N/plasma rotation within one discharge, measure (3,1) amplitude increase compared to vacuum case• repeat for different frequency of antenna current• comparison with code calculations possible
Influence of error fields on plasma rotation:
• compare torque onto plasma with theory (with and without q=3 surface) for different coil current frequencies and plasma pressures
Proposals for resistive wall mode experiments onTEXTOR
Develop scenarios with external (3,1) RWM mode
• vacuum vessel: rw/a = 1.35, w = 14 ms• try to stabilize RWM by rotating external (3,1) perturbation fields (compare required rotation velocity with theory)
Physics of neoclassical tearing modes (NTMs)
jBS p
Magnetic islands driven by the loss of bootstrap current inside island
Helical current parallel to plasma currentdrives magnetic islands unstable
Interaction of NTMs with different helicity
No simultaneous large NTMs of different helicities
Stabilising effect of additional helical field
For finite perpendicular heat conductivity helical field perturbation reducesBS current perturbation caused by single magnetic island
Contour plots of BS current perturbation
Single magnetic island with external perturbation field
Stabilization of NTMs by external error fields
DIII-D: suppression of (3,2) NTM onset successful, but strong reduction in plasma rotation observed
n=3 perturbation field
Stabilization of NTMs by external error fields
On TEXTOR: rotating perturbation fields possible
• (3,2) NTM stabilization by external (3,1) fields
Stabilization of NTMs by external error fields
On TEXTOR: rotating perturbation fields possible
• NTM stabilization by external (3,1) fields for qa < 3
• if perturbation field too small use conditions with error field amplifications
• Influence plasma rotation by external fields, study effect on NTM stability
Conclusions
“Rotating” external perturbation fields of a single helicity opens new possibilities for MHD experiments on TEXTOR:
• error field amplification experiments, comparison with theory - frequency dependence of error field amplification - influence on plasma rotation
• Resistive wall mode studies
• Stabilization of NTMs by external perturbation fields
Newcomb criterion
Cylindrical plasma: pointing vector into vacuum region ~ - ’|r=a
For zero growth rate (ok for RWMs) it describes the energy released from plasma from infinitely slow perturbation (no energy converted to kinetic energy)
wall position
rplasma edge
1
0
r(=0) closer to plasma the larger ’|r=a
(the more unstable the smaller r(=0)
more unstable
Error field amplification influences plasma rotation
Error field amplification reduced plasma rotation RWM growth
Strait et al., IAEA 2002
Critical Rotation Scaling
Strait et al., IAEA 2002