the individual building’s ahera recordkeeping system and ......removal, iea project #0801196 final...
TRANSCRIPT
June 12, 2008 Ted Sherman Saint Paul ISD #625 360 Colborne Street Saint Paul, MN 55102 Dear Ted: Enclosed please find two (2) copies of the Wellstone Elementary – Spring Break 2008 Asbestos Removal, IEA Project #0801196 Final Report. One of these copies should be maintained with the Individual Building’s AHERA Recordkeeping System and the other with the District’s AHERA Recordkeeping System. If there is anything we can do to assist with the preparation/design of any abatement you are considering for the future, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Brenda Fischer Senior Project Manager BF/wb 040808 Enclosures cc File
- Final Report –
Wellstone Elementary Spring Break 2008 Flooring Removal
65 Kellogg Blvd. East Saint Paul, MN 55101
Saint Paul ISD #625
June 5, 2008
Client No. 2001
IEA Project No. 0801196
Project Summary IEA Project No. 0801196
Wellstone Elementary Start Date: April 2, 2008 No. of Phases: Two Completion Date: April 2, 2008 Reason for Response Action: Planned Removal Project Design & Specification Development Provided By: Response Action Conducted By: IEA Project Designer: Contractor Name: (See Appendix F for license/certificate) Mavo Systems, Inc. Brenda Fischer Contractor License No.: AC200
Designer Accreditation No.: AD2296
IEA Project Manager: Project Manager: Brenda Fischer Larry Reese
IEA On-Site Monitor(s)/Accreditation No.: Site Supervisor(s): (See Appendix F for qualifications) (See Appendix D for license/certificate/medical)
Michael Altermatt AS9977 Troy Blanchard Were specifications/project design developed? Yes
Saint Paul ISD #625 Project Specifications The specifications included the following items: Requirements for contractor compliance with all
applicable federal, state & local regulations. Asbestos-containing material removal standards.
Air monitoring protocol & analysis. Scope of work to be conducted. Equipment and material to be used. Personal protection requirements. Environmental clean-up standards. Medical monitoring requirements. Project clearance requirements. Personnel entry & exit procedures. Worker certification & training requirements.
Inspection of the work area & documentation of removal procedures.
Waste disposal procedures. Preliminary Activities The contractor supplied IEA with submittals including all licenses, permits, certifications, insurance policies, schedules
and plans. Waste Disposal All asbestos-containing debris was stored in a secure area until transported to SKB Rosemount Industrial Waste Facility,
13425 Courthouse Blvd., Rosemount, Minnesota, 55068. A waste disposal manifest is located in Appendix E.
Table of Contents Appendix A...................... Final Reports Appendix B...................... Certificate of Visual Inspection Appendix C...................... Contractor’s License Contractor’s Insurance Certificate(s) Appendix D...................... Contractor’s Daily Sign-In Sheet(s) Contractor’s Daily Log(s) Contractor’s Enclosure Sign-In Sheet(s) (if applicable) Worker’s Certificates/Licenses/Medicals Appendix E...................... Landfill Manifest(s) Appendix F ...................... On-Site Monitor Qualifications Project Designer Certification/License
Appendix A
Final Reports
IEA Project No. 0801196 Phase No.: 1 Response Start Date: April 2, 2008 Response Completion Date: April 2, 2008 Location: Room 209 Type of Containment: Critical Barrier Material Description
Material Type Asbestos Content Amount Response Action 9” x 9” Vinyl Floor Tile & Mastic Assumed 315 square feet Removal Response Stages I. Pre-Abatement Activities
Baseline cleaning was performed prior to construction of protective barriers. (This cleaning was conducted in compliance with Section 763.9 of AHERA.)
Critical barriers were used to lock out all ventilation systems, doors, windows, permanent fixtures and any other openings.
Polyethylene “splash guards” were constructed along all walls. A one (1)-stage decontamination unit was constructed contiguous to the work area. A one (1)-stage bag-out was constructed. Warning signs were posted at all access points.
II. Abatement Activities
The containment area was 2,889 cubic feet. Negative air pressure was established within the work area. This was accomplished with one (1) HEPA unit(s) rated at 2,000 cubic feet per minute. A visual inspection was made of the enclosure prior to removal to verify its integrity and evaluate the direction of
air flow. All applicable posting requirements were met. Entrance to and exit from the work area was observed to ensure that the appropriate personal protective
equipment was worn and decontamination procedures were followed. Visual monitoring of work practices was accomplished by observation from inside the enclosure during removal
and cleanup. The asbestos-containing material was saturated with amended water prior to removal from the substrate. All removal was completed in a nonfriable manner. The removed asbestos-containing material was immediately placed into appropriately labeled disposal bags
and/or drums before it was allowed to dry. All debris was cleaned up at the end of each shift. Periodic inspections were conducted for damage or penetration of the barriers in order to maintain the integrity of
the containment area. HEPA-filtered pressure differential unit(s) were inspected for proper functioning and cleanliness of pre-filters. Asbestos-containing mastic (adhesive) was removed using chemical solvents in a nonfriable manner.
III. Decontamination & Disposal
A final cleaning was conducted using HEPA-filtered vacuums and wet methods. All asbestos-containing material and contaminated debris was properly sealed in double 6-mil labeled bags or in
sealed drums. One (1) bag and three (3) barrels of containerized debris were decontaminated, removed from the enclosure and
stored in a locked storage area. A final inspection was conducted of the containment area on April 2, 2008, by Michael Altermatt. All surfaces were checked to ensure that no dust and/or debris remained. After final inspection, the floor surface was scrubbed with a one percent (1%) liquid Tide and water solution.
IV. Air Quality
A. Outside the Enclosure
No air sampling was conducted during the nonfriable removal of asbestos-containing materials (not required).
B. Clearance Sampling
No clearance air sampling was conducted after the nonfriable removal of asbestos-containing material (not
required). V. Project Closeout
After the non-friable removal was complete or clearance air was achieved, the temporary enclosure barriers were removed and disposed of as asbestos-contaminated debris.
All equipment and materials were removed from the area. An inspection was conducted of the area for damages and a punch list was compiled. The contractor is
responsible for addressing all punch list items prior to receiving final payment.
IEA Project No. 0801196 Phase No.: 2 Response Start Date: April 2, 2008 Response Completion Date: April 2, 2008 Location: Room 105B Type of Containment: Critical Barrier Material Description
Material Type Asbestos Content Amount Response Action 9” x 9” Vinyl Floor Tile & Mastic Assumed 190 square feet Removal Response Stages I. Pre-Abatement Activities
Baseline cleaning was performed prior to construction of protective barriers. (This cleaning was conducted in compliance with Section 763.9 of AHERA.)
Critical barriers were used to lock out all ventilation systems, doors, windows, permanent fixtures and any other openings.
Polyethylene “splash guards” were constructed along all walls. A one (1)-stage decontamination unit was constructed contiguous to the work area. A one (1)-stage bag-out was constructed. Warning signs were posted at all access points.
II. Abatement Activities
The containment area was 1,764 cubic feet. Negative air pressure was established within the work area. This was accomplished with one (1) HEPA unit(s) rated at 2,000 cubic feet per minute. A visual inspection was made of the enclosure prior to removal to verify its integrity and evaluate the direction of
air flow. All applicable posting requirements were met. Entrance to and exit from the work area was observed to ensure that the appropriate personal protective
equipment was worn and decontamination procedures were followed. Visual monitoring of work practices was accomplished by observation from inside the enclosure during removal
and cleanup. The asbestos-containing material was saturated with amended water prior to removal from the substrate. All removal was completed in a nonfriable manner. The removed asbestos-containing material was immediately placed into appropriately labeled disposal bags
and/or drums before it was allowed to dry. All debris was cleaned up at the end of each shift. Periodic inspections were conducted for damage or penetration of the barriers in order to maintain the integrity of
the containment area. HEPA-filtered pressure differential unit(s) were inspected for proper functioning and cleanliness of pre-filters. Asbestos-containing mastic (adhesive) was removed using chemical solvents in a nonfriable manner.
III. Decontamination & Disposal
A final cleaning was conducted using HEPA-filtered vacuums and wet methods. All asbestos-containing material and contaminated debris was properly sealed in double 6-mil labeled bags or in
sealed drums. Three (3) bags and two (2) barrels of containerized debris were decontaminated, removed from the enclosure and
stored in a locked storage area. A final inspection was conducted of the containment area on April 2, 2008, by Michael Altermatt. All surfaces were checked to ensure that no dust and/or debris remained. After final inspection, the floor surface was scrubbed with a one percent (1%) liquid Tide and water solution.
IV. Air Quality
A. Outside the Enclosure
No air sampling was conducted during the nonfriable removal of asbestos-containing materials (not required).
B. Clearance Sampling
No clearance air sampling was conducted after the nonfriable removal of asbestos-containing material (not
required). V. Project Closeout
After the non-friable removal was complete or clearance air was achieved, the temporary enclosure barriers were removed and disposed of as asbestos-contaminated debris.
All equipment and materials were removed from the area. An inspection was conducted of the area for damages and a punch list was compiled. The contractor is
responsible for addressing all punch list items prior to receiving final payment.
Appendix B
Certificate of Visual Inspection
Appendix C
Contractor’s License Contractor’s Insurance Certificate(s)
Appendix D
Contractor’s Daily Sign-In Sheet(s) Contractor’s Daily Log(s)
Contractor’s Enclosure Sign-In Sheet(s) (if applicable) Worker Certificates/State Licenses/Medicals
Appendix E
Landfill Manifest(s)
Appendix F
On-Site Monitor Qualifications Project Designer Certification/State License