J. Great Lakes Res. 10(4):461-462Internat. Assoc. Great Lakes Res., 1984

COMMENTARY

THE IMPORTANCE OF ESTABLISHING A PERMANENT TRUST FUND FORGREAT LAKES RESEARCH*

M. Husain SadarScientific Advisor

Federal Environment Assessment Review OfficeGovernment of Canada

Fontaine BuildingHull, Quebec KIA OH3

Research on a highly complex, dynamic, anddiverse system such as the Great Lakes requireslong-term commitment, substantial resources, andinteragency and multi-disciplinary co-ordination.Consequently, the establishment of workable insti­tutional and cost-sharing arrangements to fosterresearch on the Great Lakes presents a formidablechallenge. It is currently very complicated to fundand coordinate comprehensive and long-termresearch activities on the Great Lakes involvingtwo federal, one provincial, and eight state govern­ments as well as private institutions. Additionalcomplications arise because of rapid shifts in polit­ical climates and subsequent changes in fund allo­cations and research in the United States and Can­ada. Politicians in those countries are frequently inoffice for four to five years' duration, and conse­quently are often unable to focus on issues relatingto a system such as the Great Lakes which has arecycling period extending over hundreds of years.

Needless to say, solving the environmental prob­lems of today as well as those of tomorrowrequires well-planned and long-term research strat­egies. For example, toxic substances is a primaryfocus today and concern over this issue undoubt­edly will expand even further as the presence ofnew environmental pollutants are documented.Current research in this area is so inadequate thatbasic information on sources, fate, and effects of

*The views expressed in this article are strictly the author's own anddo not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Federal EnvironmentalAssessment Review Office (FEARO).

461

most toxic substances is woefully incomplete.Other areas where comprehensive, long-term

Great Lakes research is needed include:

- The issue of diverting water out of the GreatLakes basin to more arid regions and theimpact such a diversion would have on ship­ping, power industries, fisheries, andnearshore habitats.

- Justifying pollution controls on chemical andpaper/pulp dischargers, particularly duringperiods of economic recession, as the free­market fails to encourage recycling of wasteproducts unless the resource is scarce.

- Baseline data to develop fundamental knowl­edge about the lakes and against which trendsor suspected changes can be compared.

-Study of past achievements under the U.S.Clean Air and Water Acts, as well as data onthe implications of future legislation in boththe U.S. and Canada.

- The implication of:

(1) past/present/future atmospheric depositions,(2) aging wastewater treatment plants and urban

infrastructures,(3) the decline of mid-west steel and auto indus­

tries, as well as declining agriculture,(4) the changing significance of the Great Lakes

system to the social and economic fabric ofNorth America.

- Given the above considerations, I proposethat a permanent GREAT LAKESRESEARCH TR UST FUND should be set

462 M. H. SADAR

up. The fund would be used for those aspectsof Great Lakes Research which require a long­term commitment.

In order to meet these research needs effectively,substantial funds might initially be contributed bythe United States and Canadian Federal govern­ments, the Great Lakes states, and the Province ofOntario. The fund could be replenished periodi­cally by planned contributions by the participants.The mechanistic details for the management anddistribution of the fund could be incorporated in a

future U.S./Canadian agreement or perhapsthrough legislation.

The establishment of such a trust fund and itsproper management would create more stability inresource allocations for Great Lakes research.This, in turn, would enhance the ability ofresearchers to plan and undertake more compre­hensive and long-term programs and would be amajor step toward managing the Great Lakes froman ecosystem perspective.