the impact of the antifouling systems on improving fuel efficiency … · 2018. 10. 22. ·...

16
The impact of the antifouling systems on improving fuel efficiency and reducing exhaust gas emissions the case of Hempaguard X7 Naples Shipping Week 2018 27 th September 2018 Davide Ippolito Ph.D. Group Product Manager, Marine

Upload: others

Post on 08-Mar-2021

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The impact of the antifouling systems on improving fuel efficiency … · 2018. 10. 22. · Hempaguard X7 application SPC Silyl acrylate Long idle period Fuel penalty of the sister

The impact of the antifouling systems

on improving fuel efficiency

and reducing exhaust gas emissions

the case of Hempaguard X7

Naples Shipping Week 2018 – 27th September 2018Davide Ippolito Ph.D.Group Product Manager, Marine

Page 2: The impact of the antifouling systems on improving fuel efficiency … · 2018. 10. 22. · Hempaguard X7 application SPC Silyl acrylate Long idle period Fuel penalty of the sister

2

o Strict environmental regulations with strong business impact

o Reduction of SOx emissions – 2020 sulphur cap

o Reduction of NOx and particular matter (PM) emissions

o Reduction of CO2 emissions

o Reduction of release of material into the sea (for example like microplastic)

o Challenging market conditions

o Low freight rates for some segments

o Increasing in market consolidation

o Increasing of CAPEX and OPEX

o Retrofit costs of SOx scrubber - $3.0 – 8.0 MUSD

o Retrofits costs for using alternative fuels (e.g. LNG) are high

o Use of expensive MGO with uncertain availability

o Operation cost of scrubber in the order of $45USD/ton of bunker scrubbed

The challenges

08 October 2018

Page 3: The impact of the antifouling systems on improving fuel efficiency … · 2018. 10. 22. · Hempaguard X7 application SPC Silyl acrylate Long idle period Fuel penalty of the sister

24/03/15 3

The importance of the antifouling

• Decrease of fuel consumption

• Improve flexibility in trading:

• wide operational span (activity and speed)

• much longer idle days

• operation in very diverse trading areas

• Stop expensive and time consuming underwater hull cleanings

• Improve the environmental footprint of the vessel

Page 4: The impact of the antifouling systems on improving fuel efficiency … · 2018. 10. 22. · Hempaguard X7 application SPC Silyl acrylate Long idle period Fuel penalty of the sister

HEMPAGUARD familyRedefining hull performance expectations

4

Smooth and low surface

energy

Hydrogel technology

Biocide

From a technical point of view Value for you

Fuel savings

High

trading flexibility

Page 5: The impact of the antifouling systems on improving fuel efficiency … · 2018. 10. 22. · Hempaguard X7 application SPC Silyl acrylate Long idle period Fuel penalty of the sister

How the trading flexibility is achieved

24/03/15 5

Page 6: The impact of the antifouling systems on improving fuel efficiency … · 2018. 10. 22. · Hempaguard X7 application SPC Silyl acrylate Long idle period Fuel penalty of the sister

6

Complete Flexibility in Operation

• Vessel speed does not affect the diffusion rate of biocide

• Efficient biocide utilisation

• Highly effective during long idle period

08.10.2018

0

50

100

150

0,02 0,2 2 20

Biocidediffusion rate

Speed (knots)

Measured biociderelease rate

Release rate fromActiGuard

Page 7: The impact of the antifouling systems on improving fuel efficiency … · 2018. 10. 22. · Hempaguard X7 application SPC Silyl acrylate Long idle period Fuel penalty of the sister

7

Extremely low biocide content compared to a SPC antifouling – per m2

08.10.2018

4.6%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

SPC AF Hempaguard X7By weight of total biocide content for 1 m2

Page 8: The impact of the antifouling systems on improving fuel efficiency … · 2018. 10. 22. · Hempaguard X7 application SPC Silyl acrylate Long idle period Fuel penalty of the sister

8

Bulk carrier over 2 dry dockings intervals

08 October 2018

Silyl methacrylate antifouling indocking

after 3 yearsHempaguard X7 indocking, 3 years later

Page 9: The impact of the antifouling systems on improving fuel efficiency … · 2018. 10. 22. · Hempaguard X7 application SPC Silyl acrylate Long idle period Fuel penalty of the sister

ISO 19030 Measurement of changes in hull and propeller performance

08-10-2018

• Several methods exist to measure fuel performance

• ISO 19030 was introduced late 2016

• It is transparent method to compare ship´s speed-power relationship over time

• It allows to take fact based decisions on the need of any corrective actions

Page 10: The impact of the antifouling systems on improving fuel efficiency … · 2018. 10. 22. · Hempaguard X7 application SPC Silyl acrylate Long idle period Fuel penalty of the sister

Speed loss and in-service performance

08-10-2018

• A relative measure [%]

• Related to power increase (roughly

1:3)

Speed loss = 𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑒𝑑 −𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑒𝑑

𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑒𝑑

Page 11: The impact of the antifouling systems on improving fuel efficiency … · 2018. 10. 22. · Hempaguard X7 application SPC Silyl acrylate Long idle period Fuel penalty of the sister

Speed loss and in-service performance

08-10-2018

• A relative measure [%]

• Related to power increase (roughly

1:3)

Speed loss = 𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑒𝑑 −𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑒𝑑

𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑒𝑑

Page 12: The impact of the antifouling systems on improving fuel efficiency … · 2018. 10. 22. · Hempaguard X7 application SPC Silyl acrylate Long idle period Fuel penalty of the sister

Performance example 1Bulker – Hempaguard

12

• Data:• Noon reports

• Evaluation:• Performance of Hempaguard good compared to

SPC antifoluing

• Fuel penalty from speed loss alone*:

Hempaguard: 920,000 USD

SPC antifouling: 2,000,000 USD

Savings: 1,080,000 USD

CO2 emissions saved: 7200 t

20 September 2017

Sp

ee

d lo

ss %

Silyl meth-acrylate

SPC antifouling

Hempaguard

Average speed loss:

1.4% Average speed loss:

3%

*90 t/day, 85% activity, 400 USD/t

Full blast

Page 13: The impact of the antifouling systems on improving fuel efficiency … · 2018. 10. 22. · Hempaguard X7 application SPC Silyl acrylate Long idle period Fuel penalty of the sister

Performance example 2VLCC, top tier silyl acrylate SPC antifouling

08-10-2018

Speed loss: 6.2% over 20 months

Fuel penalty since DD*:

950,000 USD

*Given a fuel cost of 400 USD/ ton, 65% activity, 80 mt fuel/ day

Ref. period

Long idle period

Page 14: The impact of the antifouling systems on improving fuel efficiency … · 2018. 10. 22. · Hempaguard X7 application SPC Silyl acrylate Long idle period Fuel penalty of the sister

Performance example 3VLCC – Hempaguard X7

08-10-2018

DD

Average speed loss: 0.5 % over 20 months

Average performance 1st year Average performance 2nd year

Fuel penalty since DD*:

Hempaguard X7: 80,000 USD

*Given a fuel cost of 400 USD/ ton, 65% activity, 80 mt fuel/ day

Hempaguard X7

application

SPC Silyl acrylate

Long idle period

Fuel penalty of the sister vessel:

SPC Antifouling: 950,000 USD

Page 15: The impact of the antifouling systems on improving fuel efficiency … · 2018. 10. 22. · Hempaguard X7 application SPC Silyl acrylate Long idle period Fuel penalty of the sister

Conclusions

08-10-2018

Moving to the next generation antifouling like Hempaguard X7 is the pathway for

improving fuel performance, reduce emissions and face the current market challenges

Page 16: The impact of the antifouling systems on improving fuel efficiency … · 2018. 10. 22. · Hempaguard X7 application SPC Silyl acrylate Long idle period Fuel penalty of the sister

08-10-2018

For any further clarification...

To go deeper into this topic...

To know something else about fouling

defence...

Please contact:

Davide Ippolito

[email protected]