the impact of land use changes on the future tree distributions
DESCRIPTION
The Impact of Land Use Changes on the Future Tree Distributions. Presented by Jin-Oh Kim Community and Regional Planning School of Architecture University of Texas at Austin. Introduction. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
The Impact of Land Use Changes on the Future Tree Distributions
Presented by Presented by
Jin-Oh KimJin-Oh Kim
Community and Regional PlanningCommunity and Regional Planning
School of ArchitectureSchool of Architecture
University of Texas at AustinUniversity of Texas at Austin
- Biogenic Volatile Organic Compounds (BVOC)Biogenic Volatile Organic Compounds (BVOC) forms forms ozone in ground-level when mixed with nitrogen oxides from ozone in ground-level when mixed with nitrogen oxides from anthropogenic sources.anthropogenic sources.
- Differences in climatology including Differences in climatology including temperaturetemperature and and cloud cloud covercover, and , and land useland use strongly affect biogenic emissions. strongly affect biogenic emissions.
- Few studies have focused on the relationship between Few studies have focused on the relationship between land land use patternsuse patterns and its impact on spatial variation in and its impact on spatial variation in biogenic biogenic emissionsemissions densities. densities.
Introduction
Land Development
Disaster (fire, flood, etc), disease (oak wilt)
Natural Environment (soil, water, temperature etc.)
Trees (oak)BVOC+Nitrogen Oxides
Temperature, Cloud cover
Relationship of Trees and Land Development in Air Quality Context
Biogenic Volatile Organic Compounds
VOC
Volatile Organic Compounds
HumanHealth
- In Texas, In Texas, vegetation and forests in eastern and central Texasvegetation and forests in eastern and central Texas are the main sources of emissions of BVOC. are the main sources of emissions of BVOC.
- Even though most plants emit some VOCs, the largest emitters are Even though most plants emit some VOCs, the largest emitters are oaks, pines, sweet gums, eucalyptus, and oaks, pines, sweet gums, eucalyptus, and poplarspoplars. .
Problem Statements
Density Map of Biogenic Emission in Texas in 1997 (EPA)
High Emission Density
1. Predict Future Tree Distributions based on Land Use Scenarios
3. Recommendations to Improve Land use Scenarios
Objectives
2. Understanding the Impact of Land Development on Oak Trees
Central Texas region (Travis, Williamson, Bastrop, Hays, Caldwell)
Research Areas
Data Sources
Texas Vegetation Map (From Dr. David Allen) Land Development Scenario Maps (Dr. Barbara Parmenter, Envision Central Texas Project) USDA Soils Data for Central Texas Area (Statsgo State Soil Database) Color infra-red Digital OrthophotoTNRIS, http://www.tnris.state.tx.us/)
Live Oak, Ashe Juniper Parks
Post Oak, Woods, Forest and Grass
Post Oak Woods and Forest
Live Oak, Mesquite, Ashe Juniper
Analysis of Vegetation Types in Central Texas
Scenario A Scenario B
Scenario C Scenario D
Impact of Land Development on Trees
Tree Distribution in 2001
Land Development Scenarios Proposed by Envision Central Texas Project
Scenario A Scenario B
Scenario C Scenario D
Projection of Future Land Development Impact on Trees
Trees in 2001
Scenario A Scenario B
Scenario C Scenario D
Future Land Development Impact vs. Trees
DowntownTownResidentialActivity CenterLarge LotCommercialIndustrial
Scenario A Scenario B
Scenario C Scenario D
Tree Existing Areas Predicted to be Developed
DowntownTownResidentialActivity CenterLarge LotCommercialIndustrial
Scenario A Scenario B
Scenario C Scenario D
Development Types where Trees exist under Scenarios
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
Larg
e Lo
t
Res
iden
tial
Rur
al
Con
serv
atio
n
Tow
n
Indu
stria
l
Hig
hway
Offi
ce P
ark
Act
ivity
Cen
ter
New
Tow
n
City
City
City
Dow
ntow
n
Dow
ntow
n
Dow
ntow
n
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
1. Rural2. Large Lot3. Conservation rural
1. Residential2. Rural3. Large Lot
1. Large Lot2. Residential3. Rural
1. Conservation Rural
2. Activity Center3. Rural
Prediction of Tree existing Areas
Tree Area to be Preserved(under Scenarios)
Pervious Cover Assumption (%)
Tree Keeping Assumption (%)
Actual Area of Trees to be Preserved
Arc GIS Raster Calculations
Trees predicted to be preserved for each development type under Scenario A
Development TypesArea
(square feet)
Pervious cover (%)
Pervious cover (square feet)
% of Tree keeping
(assumption)
Area of TreePreserved
Rural Housing 1464487200 95.37 1396681442.64 80.00 1117345154.11
Large Lot 1109263121 82.08 910483169.95 60.00 546289901.97
Conservation Rural 601674278 91.91 552998829.28 90.00 497698946.35
Residential Subdivision 434001387 72.67 315388807.85 50.00 157694403.92
Activity Center 118253105 10.37 12262847.02 40.00 4905138.81
Highway Commercial 113237539 5.68 6431892.23 40.00 2572756.89
Industrial / Office Park 71176499 20.00 14235299.71 50.00 7117649.86
Town 19248929 34.27 6596608.06 50.00 3298304.03
City 2401275 29.13 699491.37 50.00 349745.69
Downtown 735875 4.60 33850.23 50.00 16925.11
ssumption ssumption
Qualitative Research needs to be conducted
Oak Tree Distributions
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
300000
350000
400000
450000
500000
Post Oak,Woods, Forest
and Gras
Live Oak, AsheJuniper Parks
Post OakWoods and
Forest
Live Oak,Mesquite, Ashe
Juniper
Live Oak, AsheJuniper Woods
Are
a(ac
re)
1. Post Oak, Woods, Forest and Grass2. Live Oak, ashe Junifer Parks3. Post Oak Woods and Forest
Soil Composition in Oak Tree Areas
0
500000000
1000000000
1500000000
2000000000
2500000000
BR
AC
KE
TT-
PA
DIN
A-
CO
MFO
RT-
CR
OC
KE
TT-
ED
GE
-TA
BO
R-
CR
OC
KE
TT-
SLI
DE
LL-
EC
KR
AN
T-H
OU
STO
NM
EG
UIN
-E
CK
RA
NT-
RA
DE
R-
BE
RG
STR
OM
-S
AN
SA
BA
-B
AS
TSIL
-A
US
TIN
-TI
NN
-PU
RS
LEY
-N
OR
MA
NG
EE
-B
RA
NY
ON
-H
EID
EN
-P
AD
INA
-LE
WIS
VIL
LE-
MA
RG
IE-
ZAC
K-Z
ULC
H-
HE
NS
LEY
-C
RO
CK
ETT
-
Soil Types
Are
a (s
quar
e km
)