the hugoniot of 4340 steel rc 54-55

16
[ADeY;~ov3; * MEMORANDUM REPORT ARBRL-MR-(0951 F THE HUGON lOT OF 4340 STEEL RC 54-55 Robert E. Franz Joseph L. Robitalle September 1979 D D LZ 0 ~ *00 fiew frSI pmi e; distctieft atludted. Li m 79~ 3@053

Upload: nguyenkiet

Post on 30-Jan-2017

232 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Hugoniot of 4340 Steel RC 54-55

[ADeY;~ov3;

* MEMORANDUM REPORT ARBRL-MR-(0951

F THE HUGON lOT OF 4340 STEEL RC 54-55

Robert E. FranzJoseph L. Robitalle

September 1979 D D

LZ

0 ~ *00 fiew frSI pmi e; distctieft atludted.

Li

m 79~ 3@053

Page 2: The Hugoniot of 4340 Steel RC 54-55

Destroy this report when it is no longer needed.DO not return it to the originator.

Secondary distribution of this report by originatingor sponsoring activity is prohibited.

Additional copies of this report may be obtainedfmthe National Technical 14fonat ion Service,

U .. ,1' rtiot of Cmercmjet Spigild, irgni

&A Offi A uIi DS&tmOhe Aej ty positionpale"Lodsptdb terahr~ddcms

Page 3: The Hugoniot of 4340 Steel RC 54-55

UNCLASSIFIED

REPORVOWQMEN4TATION PAGE saFrmsCaMbgamaoV004MON~v t S. CIPIRINTS CAT ALOG 11UMVIN

MEMORANDL4 REPORT' 517RL. -W29I A

j The IW.goniot of 43A0 Steel RC 5-55 Foa

j Robert E ranx @W Joseph L./Robitaille '

S. PESPO~fiuG OmSAW I AT10*MMN wArND ADORE8 to. P201WAM a TPROJICT.TYA

US Army Ballistic Research Laboratory A3

AT*WN; DRDAR-BLT DA r W626M

Abrde Prvn Ground, RDIC 21005 Aw DO

USA Aramn Reeac &A A evelo m Command @1.)9SCE? LM( w~

Unclassified

Approved for public release; distributaon unlimited.

I ?4tO YMU (met409Mas T90* Sad ""a soft* ON 3hI 1 I&# ff"e 6M xRwo

Shoi physiics~44 Steel

am &W aCVX ofw4 am OW a wem or : St 21.me1ugonlot of 4340 steel of Rockwell %C3E hardness 54-55 has been measured.

The a or b.c.c. phase iagos~tot can be rep"Seted by the equAtion U a 4.67The4 u whereoU is the ae vciy MWas uboie the parce velosityo o)t/i.The4 u wher U is the cave vcity pae above the paG rtil ocity pint i/sclose to that of roiled hamosms amr.

CO ,.., W mmw' .'AUNCL~ASSFIED

Page 4: The Hugoniot of 4340 Steel RC 54-55

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Nae

TAbLE OF CONTENrS ..... ............. .

1. INTRODUCTION .

II. EXPERIMENTAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

III. RESULTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

REFERENCES ..... ...... ........................ 13

DISTRIBUTION LIST . ......... .................... IS

.: . 11LI I cr-'amt 0Ipit% cl

1"A

Page 5: The Hugoniot of 4340 Steel RC 54-55

1. INTRODUCTION

For some time the Ballistic Research Laboratory has been measuringand studying the mechanical and physical properties of materials ofinterest to the Army. This includes a spectrum of tests from slowlyapplied loads in convential testing machines to shock loading with light-gas gun impacts or high explosives. This report gives results of shockwave tests on 4340 steel of Rockwell "C" hardness 54-55. It, also,includes ultrasonic and quasi-static data which provide zero points onthe high pressure Hugoniot curves. Table I gives a chemical analysis ofthis material.

Like iron and rolled homogeneous armor (RHA), 4340 steel displays aphase transition under shock loading at approximately 13 GPa. Thiscauses the material to display a one, two, or three wave structure depend-

ing on the initial shock strength. Hlauver , 2 has discussed this phenominonin two recent reports on the Iugoniot of RHA. The experimental methodused for this study is the same as Hiauver's and consists of measuring andanalyzing the free surface motion of a sample of material shocked in theusual one-dimensional strain experiment. This motion can become compli-cated when the three wave structure is encountered. The analysis used isthe same as in the aforementioned reports. It is based on a mid-point ofthe wave analysis used by Barker 3, in which the wave velocities are meas-ured from the half amplitude points in the wave.

11. EXPER|MWNTAL

The experimental specimens were cut out of a IOM (4-inch) roundbar of material and heat-treated to RC 54-55 hardness. They were, then,machined to final dimensions. The heat-treatment consisted of soaking at860C for 30 minutes, oil quenching, drawing down at 315%: for I hout.and air cooling. The measured density of the material was 7800 kg/ms.

The experiments were performtsI with the BRI. light-Sas gun. The freesurface motion was measured with a laser velocity interferometer called aVISAR which was developed by Barker 4. Figure I shows the results of fivetests performed at different impact velocities. Four are symetricalimpacts of nominal 6.13mm thick plates of 4340 steel 7tm in diameter and

'G. IIziuver, "The A'a-ihao Hu;onfit of RolZ led HVenerto Amr.iOi",ballitie' Rceavarch !1,*orto#O Momran..k. .+port No. 2b1, Azguet 1979.

~'6. Nauvar and A. "'itZni. "Tho H l~Pa u iicomiot of Role4 fimwgaencoua Avor", or.ande Reort ARRL-X.R-02909, Mau h 179.

L.. . azrker, "Alp;-laae Mliwyot of Iro", &1. A a. Vol. 46,., , Juno ;.976 ' 2544-

I.'. ~~4. M. IRarker -and R?. E. Hoal enIbach, "L~zer Inte4rferrnteter for MeiasuringH~ih Vlooities of An A~~&U Sw'faoe', J. AiL p2.

;97', pp 4 66-1.So 'l NoqTe

Page 6: The Hugoniot of 4340 Steel RC 54-55

1.6-

1.4 O EST NUMBERS

E 1.2o

1.0

LUU "0.8-

uj0.6-LU

.4

0.4

00 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.6 1.0 1.2

T IM E (p&,)

FIGURL 1: VISAR Results for S Tests with 4340 Steel

Page 7: The Hugoniot of 4340 Steel RC 54-55

one (Test #6) is the result of the impact of a 3.0 thick tungsten plateon a 9.43 thick 4340 steel specimen.

The elastic wave velocity was measured using an ultrasonic deviceconstructed by Hauver1 and called by him "The Thumper". This velocity,which was used in subsequent data analysis, was 5.86 ki/s.

The low pressure a-phase goes through the bulk sound velocity at the:ero point. This velocity has been calculated from bulk modulus measure-ments made in quasi-static compression tests in which the volumetricchange with load was measured. This was accomplished by measuring boththe axial and circumferential strains using resistance strain gages

applied directly to circular cylindrical specimens. The volumetric strainwas then calculated from equation (1)

= I~ tl )(I+,: -1 , (1)a

where,

c\- axial strain

c -circumferential strain.

Since in a uiiiaxial strain experiment the pressure is one-third ofthe axial stress, the slope of the curve shown ir Figure 2 is the bulkmodulus. The calculated bulk sound velocity is then 4.67 km/s. Poisson'sratio was also directly calculated using the axial and circumferentialstrain measurements.

Il. ~RESULS

Table 11 shows in tabular for% the Itugoniot points deduced from thedata and one point measured in an experiment by Ilauver in which both RPIAind 4340 were shocked to high pressure with an explosively thrown steelplate. For the 14 or b.c.c. phase the shock velocity-particle velocityline is represented by the least squares equation U - 4.67 * 1.44 uwhere U is the shock velocity and u the particle velocity. The a to ror h.c.p. phase transition occurred at an average shock pressure of 13.2GPa. The average dynamic elastic limit was 2.4) GPa. The measuredPoisson's ratio was 0.288. This gives, according to Jones and Grahams ahydrostatic transition pressure of 12.2 tWa.

50. N.. Jonoo and R. A. GrahaR, "Shoar Strvgth E ffots o" Ta.e 2Wneitio"

Pyloaur-ae" P-tm-,iud S, ,Jhook-Coqreeeio'i ofrpr-p t~a" 3tpiposi w't nOiw Acourwat. Chat.-itriatim of the High Th'epuurv Fwirm~uent. U.S.Dopt. of Comwroo, Natiopul L au of Sz, ithvrebwV, D.,O~tcber 14-28, 2968.

7

Page 8: The Hugoniot of 4340 Steel RC 54-55

The elastic limit measurements varied widely as did measurements by

Butcher and Canon 6 on this material. It is surprising and encouragingthat their average value was the same, 2.41 GPa.

Figures 3 and 4 show the U-u plots for 4340 RC 54-55 steel comparedto both RHtA and iron. It can be seen that the a-phase of each materialhas practically the same slope but the intercept depends on the bulk soundvelocity. The c-phase of RHA and 4340 are the same within the experimental

error.

ACKNOWLEDGENENTS

The authors would like to thank George [lauver for his help with theexperiments and especially for his explanations of the data analysis. Wewould like to vhank R. Benck and V. Diberardo for the quasi-static

measurements.

TABLE I

CUtMICAL ANALYSIS OF 4340 STEEL

11 L, 9MENT RESULTS %

Carbon 0.40; 0.39Manganese 0.69Phosphorus 0.005Sulfur 0.014Silicon 0.26Nickel 1.65Copper 0.15 - 0.25ChrLmium 0.7 0.9Vanad I m 0.01No I ybdcnum 0.2 - . 3Aluaminum 0.02

*Dept of Army Materials Laboratory. Frankfovd Arsenal. 16 September1976.

16B. R. Butcewr ami cl. R. Car-on, "Inftuenv (if Vorfivvfatim o" the

,qrumic Streeo-Strai' Lcnes of 4340 Steel", AIAA , Vol. 2, No. 12,

8

Page 9: The Hugoniot of 4340 Steel RC 54-55

1 ~~ -41 N4

-4 0'

>- u

00

-0

. *tt . t .1 0

-.

C) I] '40

4) 6 4 *1'.2 m

0 * aq I'0 4)

9-n "

Page 10: The Hugoniot of 4340 Steel RC 54-55

0.9

0.8-

0.7-

0.6-

~0.5-

K~ 170 GI~a

tAW

L 0.3-

0.2 BULK SOUND VELOCITY

4.67 km/s

0.1

00

FIGURE 2: Pressure vs. Volume Compression for 4340 Steel.The pressure is taken as -u/3 where o is the loaddivided by tho original area of the specimens.

10

Page 11: The Hugoniot of 4340 Steel RC 54-55

00

01 0I.-.

00

exI

(6/w) Ai3013 3AV

Page 12: The Hugoniot of 4340 Steel RC 54-55

IvC

LU

UAJ

I-. I- .CK

CL.

oC

d0

WWI '4..?3A A

Page 13: The Hugoniot of 4340 Steel RC 54-55

REFERENCES

1. G. llauver, "The Alpha-Phase Hugoniot of Rolled Homogeneous Armor".Ballistic Research Laboratory Memorandum Report No. 2651, August1976. (AD NB012871L)

2. ~. ilauver and A. Melani, "The Epsilon-Phase Hugoniot of RolledHomogeneous Armor", Memorandum Report ARBRL-MR-02909, March 1979.(AD OA096107)

3. L. M. Barker, "Alpha-Phase Ifugoniot of Iron", .1. Appl. Phys., Vol. 46,No. 6, June 1975, pp 2544-7.

4. 1.. M. Barker and R. E. Hollenbach, "Laser Interferometer for MeasuringIHigh Velocities of Any Reflecting Surface", J. Appl. Ph., Vol. 43,No. 11, November 1972, pp 4669-75.

S. 0. E. Jones and R. A. Graham, "Shear Strength Effects on Phase

Transition "Pressures" Determined from Shock-Compression Experiments",Symposium on the Accurate Characterization of the Ifigh Pressure

Environment, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards,

Gaithersburg, MD., October 14-18, 1968.

b. B. M. Butcher and J. R. Canon. "Influence of Work-liardening on the

Dynamic Stress-Strain Curves of 4340 Steel", AIAA .., Vol. 2, No. 12,

December 1964, pp 2174-9.

13

Page 14: The Hugoniot of 4340 Steel RC 54-55

DISTRIBUTION LIST

No. of No. ofCopies Organization Copies Organization

12 Comander 1 CommanderDefense Documentation Center US Army Comunications RschATTN: DDC-DDA and Development CommandCameron Station ATTN: DRDCO-PPA-SAAlexandria, VA 22314 Fort Monmouth, NJ 07703

I Deputy Assistant Secretary 1 Commanderof the Army (R&D) US Army Electronics Research

Department of the Army and Development CommandWashington, DC 20310 Technical Support Activity

ATT : DELSD-LI Commander Fort Monmouth, NJ 07703

US Army Materiel Developmentand Readines Command 2 Comander

ATTIN: DRCDHD-ST US Army Missile Research5001 Eisenhower Avenue and Development CommandAlexandria, VA 0,333 ATTN: DRIU4I-R

DRtM I -YDL2 Commander Redstone Arsenal, AL 35809

US Army Amament Researchand Development Co.and 1 Comunder

ATTNI: IRDA-TSS US Army Tank Automotive RschDover, NJ 07801 and Development Command

AMN: DRDTA-ULI:C"mande" Warren, MI 48090

US Army Armament MaterielReadiness Command I Director

A TN: DRSAR-LEP-L, Tech Lib US Army TRAIWO Systems. Rock Island, IL 614299 Analysis Activity

ATTN: ATAA-S., Tech LibSConmander White Sands Missile Range

US Army Aviation Research ?M 88002and Development Cowwad

ATTN: DRSAV-E S ComanderP. 0. Box 209 US Amy Materials andSt. Louis, MO 63166 Mechanics Research Center

ATTN: DRM-ATLI Director DRXNIR-H, Mr. J. Dignam

US Army Air Mobility Research DRXMR-H, Dr. D. Dandekarand Development Laboratory DRXW-T, Dr. J. Mescall

Ames Research Center DRE)1 Dr. S. C. Chou,'offett Field, CA, 9403S Watertown, MA 02172

i7.:

Page 15: The Hugoniot of 4340 Steel RC 54-55

DISTRIBUTION LIST

No. of No. ofCopies Organization C Organization

I Comander 3 SRI InternationalUS Army Research Office ArN: Dr. G. R. AbrahassonP. 0. Box 12211 Dr. D. CurranResearch Triangle Park Dr. L. SeamanNC 27709 333 Ravenswood Avenue

Menlo Park, CA 94025I Comander

US Military Academy I Drexel Institute of TechnologyATTN: Library Wave Propagation Research CenterWest Point, NY 10996 ATTN: Prof. P. C. Chou

32nd and Chestnut Streets

3 Commnder Philadelphia. PA 19104Naval Surface Weapons CenterATTN: Mr. W. It. Holt 2 University of California

Mr. W. Mock. Jr. Los Alamos Scientific Lab.DX-21, Lib ATTN: Tech Lib

Dahlgren, VA 22445 (X-(6, Dr. J. W. TaylorP. 0. Box 1663

Comander Los Alamos, N4 87545Naval Surface Weapons CenterATTN: Dr. J. W. Forbes 1 Washington State University

Tech Lib Department of PhysicsSilver Spring, NM) 20910 Af'N: Prof. G. E. Duvall

Pullman, WA 99163

I ComanderNaval Research LaboratoryATTN: Code 2020. Tech Lib Aberdeen Proving GroundWashington, DC 20375

Dir, IJSAMSAA1 AFW. (Tech Lib) ATTN: Dr. .1. Sperra::a

Kirtland AFB, NG4 87117 DRXSY-N4, H. CohenCdr, USATECOM

I Director ATrM: DRSTE-TO -FLawrence Livermore Laboratory Dir, Wpns Sys Concepts Team.ATTN: Dr. M. van Thiel, L-b4 Bldg. E3516, FAP. 0. box 808 AMTN: DRDAR-ACWLivermore. CA 94SS0

3 Sandia LaboratoriesArrN- Tech Lib

Dr. W. IterrmannDr. L. D. Bertholf

Albuquerque, NM 87115

16

Page 16: The Hugoniot of 4340 Steel RC 54-55

USER EVALUATION OF REPORT

Please take a few minutes to answer the questions below; tear outthis sheet and return it to Director, US Army Ballistic ResearchLaboratory, ARRAD(C!, ATTN: DRDAR-TSB, Aberdeen Proving Ground,Maryland 2100S. Your comments will provide us with informationfor improving future reports.

1. BRL Report Number

2. Does this report satisfy a need? (Comment on purpose, relatedproject, or other area of interest for which report will be used.)

3. How, specifically, is the report being used? (Informationsource, design data or procedure, management procedure, source ofideas, etc.)

4. Has the information in this report led to any quantitativesavings as far as man-hours/contract dollars saved, operating costsavoided, efficiencies achieved, etc.? If so, please elaborate.

S. General Comments (Indicate what you think should be changed tomake this report and future reports of this type more responsiveto your needs, more usable, improve readability, etc.)

6. If you would like to be contacted by the personnel who preparedthis report to raise specific questions or discuss the topic,please fill in the following information.

Name:

Telephone Number:

Organization Address: