the green empire state report
TRANSCRIPT
THE GREEN EMPIRE STATE
N Y I T
M . S . E N E R G Y M A N A G E M E N T
A L T E R N A T I V E E N E R G Y S Y S T E M S
1 0 5 7 0 4 7
S P R I N G 2 0 1 5
K. C. PATOLIA
The aim of this feasibility study report is to reinvent the
electric energy sector of the Empire State, New York. Three
possible renewable technologies, Solar, biomass and wind,
are analyzed to offset fossil fuel burning plants in next 25
years with ultimate goal of establishing energy security and
pollution free sky.
THE GREEN EMPIRE STATE
1057047, K. C. PATOLIA Page 2
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Every project big or small is successful largely due to the efforts of a number of wonderful
people who have always given their valuable advice or lent a helping hand. First and foremost, I
would like to express my special thanks to our respected professor Elijan ‘AL’ Avdic, who gave
his active guidance, help, cooperation & encouragement to accomplish this research paper.
I also place a deep sense of gratitude to my family members and my friends who have been
constant source of inspiration during the preparation of this project work.
SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING & COMPUTING SCIENCE
M. S. ENERGY MANAGEMENT (SPRING 2015)
ENGY-775 – ALTERNATIVE ENERGY SYSTEM
KINJAL C. PATOLIA (1057047)
THE GREEN EMPIRE STATE
1057047, K. C. PATOLIA Page 3
TABLE OF CONTENT
1. INTRODUCTION 4
2. ELECTRIC LOAD ANALYSIS OF NY 2.1 NY power demand & forecast 2.2 NY power generation by fuel type
5 5 6
3. GO SOLAR!!! 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Solar PV for homes 3.3 Solar PV farms 3.4 Advantages & Disadvantages
6 6 7 8 10
4. WIND FARMS TO AVAIL MOTION OF WIND 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Onshore & Offshore wind farms 4.3 Advantages & Disadvantages
11 11 12 13
5. USE GREEN TO PRESERVE GREEN 5.1 Introduction 5.2 Wood pellet heating system 5.3 Biomass power plant 5.4 Advantages & Disadvantages
14 14 15 16 18
6. NY ELECTRICITY SCENARIO AFTER 25 & 50 YEARS 19 7. CONCLUSION 20 8. REFERENCES 20
THE GREEN EMPIRE STATE
1057047, K. C. PATOLIA Page 4
1. INTRODUCTION
‘’Power the economic growth and competitiveness of New York State by providing customers
with low-cost, clean, reliable power and the innovative energy infrastructure and services they
value.’’ - MISSION OF NEW YORK POWER AUTHORITY
The total electricity consumption of NY State is the highest in the nation. But New Yorkers are
among the lowest electricity users in the nation. 20 million New Yorker’s are paying forth
highest electricity prices in the nation. To transform this high cost and fossil fuel scenarios,
many efforts have done to avail renewable energy sources. Today, New Yorkers are the
America’s 5th largest users of clean and renewable energy sources.
As New York is the Northeastern & Mid-Atlantic region of the USA, encompassed with high
technology & entrepreneurship ecosystem, it has potential to make ideal combination for using
(1) Solar power, (2) Wind power and (3) Biomass. In this paper, two design strategies are
analyzed to achieve the milestone of energy independence and clean energy. The first strategy
is small scale designs. In small scale designs, the purpose is to energize each house, each
building and each structure of the New York State. Different technologies like, solar water
heater, solar PV for homes and wood pellet boilers have potential to provide a significant
fraction of annual electricity demand of home owners and lower their electricity bills. The next
strategy is large scale designs to balance the remaining fraction. In next 25 years, these
strategies will explore clean, affordable and advanced energy solutions to empower New
Yorker’s everyday lives.
THE GREEN EMPIRE STATE
1057047, K. C. PATOLIA Page 5
2. ELECTRIC LOAD ANALYSIS OF THE EMPIRE STATE
2.1 NY POWER DEMAND AND FORECAST
CHART 1[NY POWER DEMAND AND FORECAST]
CHART 2[ELECTRICITY BY END USE SECTOR]
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
90,000
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
18,662 18,625 18,352 18,430 18,396 18,693 18,756 18,390 18,816 18,832 18,848 18,917
24,610 24,737 24,795 24,856 24,906 24,966 25,104 25,177 25,252 25,334 25,427 25,537
33,497 33,666 34,066 34,412 34,766 35,111 35,454 35,454 35,890 36,127 36,369 36,580
AVERAGE DEMAND (MW) WINTER PEAK DEMAND(MW) SUMMER PEAK DEMAND (MW)
34%
55%
2% 9%
ELECTRICITY FOR DIFFERENT END USE SECTORS
RESIDENTIAL(34%)
COMMERCIAL(55%)
TRANSPORTATION(2%)
INDUSTRIAL(9%)
THE GREEN EMPIRE STATE
1057047, K. C. PATOLIA Page 6
DEMAND OF LOAD 2014 2039(AFTER 25
YEARS)
2064(AFTER 50
YEARS)
ANNUAL AVERAGE
GROWTH
0.16% 1.4% 8%
SUMMER PEAK DEMAND 0.83% 20.75% 41.5%
WINTER PEAK DEMAND 0.32% 8% 16% TABLE 1[FORECAST OF DEMAND]
2.2 NY POWER GENERATION BY FUEL TYPE
CHART 3[NY SUMMER CAPABILITY BY FUEL TYPE]
3. GO SOLAR!!!
3.1 INTRODUCTION
Though solar insolation in the northeastern United States is variable, solar energy can play
significant role to transform rewnewable energy profile of the Empire State. NY is making
strides to turn itself into a solar power house. To harness power from solar energy, we can use
9% 7%
46% 4%
14%
4% 11% 4%
0%
NY SUMMER 2014 CABABILITY BY FUEL TYPE
GAS(3,226MW(9%))
OIL(2,564MW(7%))
GAS & OIL(17,627MW(46%))
COAL(1,495MW(4%))
NUCLEAR(5,418MW(14%))
PUMPEDSTORAGE(1,406MW(4%))
HYDRO(4,272MW(11%))
WIND(1,463MW(4%))
SOLAR(32MW(0%))
OTHER(METHANE,REFUSE &WOOD)(476MW(1%))
THE GREEN EMPIRE STATE
1057047, K. C. PATOLIA Page 7
small scale implementation (solar water heating, solar PV for homes) and lagre scale PV farms.
FIGURE 1 [SOLAR INSOLATION IN U.S.A.]
3.2 SOLAR PV FOR HOMES
FIGURE 2 [SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF SOLAR PV HOUSE]
THE GREEN EMPIRE STATE
1057047, K. C. PATOLIA Page 8
New york state is already a solar leader in USA with powering more than 10,000 homes.
Rooftop PV systems on residential buildings typically feature a capacity of about 5 to 20
kilowatts (kw), while those mounted on commercial building often reach 100 kilowatts or more.
The various components of such a system include photovoltaic modules, mounting system,
cables, solar inverters and other electrical accessories. New York has adopted “net metering,”
which allows excess electricity generated on sunny days to flow back into the electrical grid,
with credit or payment from the utility company for the power generated. New York state law
allows net metering for solar photovoltaic systems up to 25 kW in residential buildings, and up
to 2 MW in commercial and industrial settings, including serving nonprofit organizations,
schools, government and agricultural operations. The final production of electricity depends on
solar insolation and it is impacted by various factors like time of the year, weather conditions,
shading from adjustment buildings, shading from overhanging vegetation, roof slope, roof
aspect, shading from adjacent buildings and trees. It will be worth like planting 92 trees by each
family each year.
COST ANALYSIS OF SOLAR PV FOR HOME(1,832 ft2 , 5KW) COST OF INSTALLATION $25,000
State solar rebate ($0.50/Watt) $2,500
New price $22,500
Federal solar tax credit (30%) $6,750
New price $15,750
PAYBACK TIME 7 years
TABLE 3 [COST ANALYSIS OF SOLAR PV HOME]
3.3 SOLAR PV FARMS
Solar panels produce direct current (DC) electricity, so solar parks need conversion equipment
to convert this to alternating current (AC), which is the form transmitted by the electricity grid.
THE GREEN EMPIRE STATE
1057047, K. C. PATOLIA Page 9
The conversion is done by inverters. The system inverters typically provide power output at
voltages of the order of 480 VAC. Electricity grids operate at much higher voltages of the order
of tens or hundreds of thousands of volts, so transformers are incorporated to deliver the
required output to the grid. The most important plant SCADA system is used to monitor the
overall configuration.
FIGURE 3 [SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF SOLAR PV FARM]
TABLE 4 [GENERATION COST & PAYBACK TIME OF SOLAR PV FARM]
GENERATION COST & PAYBACK TIME
Plant capacity 150MW
Construction cost $580.95 × 106
Gov. Tax credit on plant cost (40%) $232.38 × 106
New cost $348.57 × 106
Depreciation(payback time 5 years) $ 69.714 × 106 /year
Interest (bond interest=4%) $13.94 × 106 /year
Operation & Maintenance(O & M=$25/kw) $3.75 × 106 /year
Fuel cost $0.00
Ash 0
Taxes 0
Carbon tax 0
Total cost $87.4 × 106 /year
Availability of source 20%
Total annual out put 262.8 × 106 kwhr/year
GENERATION COST 33 ¢ / kwhr
PAYBACK TIME 7.7 years
THE GREEN EMPIRE STATE
1057047, K. C. PATOLIA Page 10
3.4ADVANTAGES & DISADVANTAGES
ADVANTAGES
With federal government’s 30% tax credit for solar and NY’s robust framework, solar power is a
sweet deal in the state. Homeowner’s can make great solar investment with little or no up-
front cost. According to study by the Berkley National Laboratory, solar panels will add more
value to New Yorker’s properties. It will boost the economic strength while opening many
employment opportunities. It can lessen the amount of greenhouse gas emissions without
disturbing eco-system and livelihoods. Since the invention of electricity, it has been major
political and volatile issue. But solar power is isolated from such obstructions and can establish
stable renewable energy sector. The most important advantage is that the best is yet to come.
Many researches and study programs are going on throughout the world to lower the panels of
cost and to design sustainable frame in which solar farms and storage batteries will be able to
set up together. This will be the greatest mile stone in the renewable energy industry.
DISADVANTAGES
Solar does not work at night. The biggest disadvantage of solar energy is that it is not constant.
To produce solar electricity there must be sunlight. So energy must be stored or sourced
elsewhere at night. Beyond daily fluctuations, solar production decreases over winter months
when there are less sunlight hours and sun radiation is less intense. A very common criticism is
that solar energy production is relatively inefficient. Currently, widespread solar panel
efficiency- how much of the sun’s energy a solar panel can convert into electrical energy is at
around 22%. Solar electricity storage technology has not reached its potential yet. While there
THE GREEN EMPIRE STATE
1057047, K. C. PATOLIA Page 11
are many solar power storage batteries available, these are currently costly and bulky. Solar
panels are bulky. This is particularly true of higher-efficiency, traditional silicon crystalline wafer
solar modules. These are the large solar panels that are covered in glass. New technology thin-
film solar modules are much less bulky, and have recently been developed as applications such
as solar roof tiles and “amorphous” flexible solar modules. The downfall is that thin-film is
currently less efficient than crystalline wafer solar. The main hindrance to solar energy going
widespread is the cost of installing solar panels.
4. WIND FARMS TO AVAIL MOTION OF WIND
4.1 INTRODUCTION
According to National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 15TH windiest state of the U.S.A, New York
has the potential to supply more than half of electricity demands. With 20 wind energy projects
operating with rated capacity of a little more than 1,812MW, NY is ranked 11th in the nation for
installed wind generation capacity. The current wind energy sector of the state is powering
more than 500,000 homes.
FIGURE 4 [WIND ENERGY PROFILE OF NY STATE]
THE GREEN EMPIRE STATE
1057047, K. C. PATOLIA Page 12
4.2 ONSHORE AND OFFSHORE WIND FARMS
To achieve maximum output wind turbines can be installed in on-shore manner (on windy
hilltops and open plains) or off-shore manner. Presently all the wind generation is land-based
and located in upstate. There is no offshore wind plant in NY, but many projects are announced
along the east coast of the United States. The most common and reliable mechanism for any
commercial wind plant is horizontal axis wind turbine (HAWT). It consists of three main
components: the rotor, the generator and structural support. Rotor component consists of
three blades to convert wind energy into low speed rotational energy. The generator
component consists of electrical generator, the control electronics, and most likely a gearbox.
The structural support component includes the tower and rotor yaw mechanism. They have
advantages of high tip speeds of over 200 mph, high efficiency, and low torque ripple. The
height of the tower is approximately 80-85 meters.
FIGURE 5 [MECHANISM TO CONVERT WIND ENERGY INTO ELECTRIC ENERGY]
THE GREEN EMPIRE STATE
1057047, K. C. PATOLIA Page 13
TABLE 5 [GENERATION COST & PAYBACK TIME OF WIND FARMS]
4.3 ADVANTAGES & DISADVANTAGES
ADVANTAGES
The New York City and Long Island has enormous wind power potential to supply significant
amount of clean energy to customers. Wind energy is clean energy which does not cause
atmospheric emissions like fossil fuel burning plants. It is the sustainable form of energy as it is
generated by the heating of the atmosphere by the sun, the rotation of the earth and the
earth’s irregularities. Wind energy is the most economical form of renewable energy. Wind
turbines use a fraction of the land so it can be built on existing farms. Moreover, it can open
new income sources for farmers.
GENERATION COST & PAYBACK TIME
ONSHORE WIND FARM OFFSHORE WIND FARM
Plant capacity 100 MW 400MW
Plant cost $2200/kw $6230/kw
Construction cost $220 × 106 $2492 × 106 /year
Depreciation(payback time 5 years)
$44 × 106 /year $498.4 × 106 /year
Interest (bond interest=4%) $8.8 × 106 /year $99.68 × 106 /year
Operation & Maintenance(O & M=$40/kw)
$4 × 106 /year $29.6× 106 /year
Fuel cost $0.00 $0.00
Ash 0 0
Taxes 0 0
Carbon tax 0 0
Total cost $56.8 × 106 /year $627.68 × 106 /year
Availability of source 30% 45%
Total annual out put 262.8 × 106 kwhr/year 1576.8 × 106 kwhr/year
Generation cost 21.6 ¢ / kwhr 39.8 ¢ / kwhr
Production tax credit 2.2 ¢/kwhr 2.2 ¢/kwhr
NEW GENERATION COST 19.44 ¢/kwhr 37.6 ¢/kwhr
PAYBACK TIME 5.53 years 5.34 years
THE GREEN EMPIRE STATE
1057047, K. C. PATOLIA Page 14
DISADVANTAGES
The cost of wind power generation is still higher than that of fossil fueled generated.
Technologies are developed, but it is totally dependent on the availability of wind. The
availability of wind is usually higher in remote areas. So higher amount of electricity can be
produced, but it has to deal with the cost of transmission. Although it is clean and abundant
source of energy, many wind projects are opposed by people due to noise and visual impact
(Not in My Backyard). It does not cause any environment emissions, but it has still bad impact
on wild life. Till this date around 100,000 – 440,000 bird strikes are reported by The American
Bird Conservancy. Sometimes it also causes electromagnetic interference to television
reception and aviation.
5. USE GREEN TO PRESERVE GREEN
5.1 INTRODUCTION
FIGURE 6[BIOMASS RESERVES OF NY]
THE GREEN EMPIRE STATE
1057047, K. C. PATOLIA Page 15
Biomass has always been an important energy source for the country considering the benefits it
offers. It is renewable, widely available, carbon-neutral and the potential to provide significant
employment in rural areas. The agricultural residues can generate a significant amount of
electrical energy. Another considerable source of energy is the municipal solid waste or garbage
of the city. This type of conversion of energy will help not only for energy production, but it will
also support waste management activity of the state.
5.2 WOOD PELLET HEATING SYSTEM
FIGURE 7[WOOD PELLET HEATING BOILER]
NY is bestowed with enormous forest reserves. This biomass can be used as a domestic source
of energy. High-efficiency, low-emission wood pellets are capable of changing heating profile of
the state. Home heating oil has continued to increase by 30% over 2010 prices and is now
almost triple the price in 2000. Wood pellets will lower the demand of imported and costly oil.
In this way, it will help to stabilize economy and to open new employment resources. It can also
THE GREEN EMPIRE STATE
1057047, K. C. PATOLIA Page 16
preserve the heritage of the region. Wood pellets contain very low amount of moisture (only 5-
7%) and less ash as the bark is removed. If pellets are bought in bulk, then home owners can
save approximately 40% of fuel costs compared to oil. These projects are quick to be moved
and can be completed in the summer or early fall for the upcoming season. It gives more or
equal comfort level compared to traditional fossil fueled heat sources. A wood heating boiler
consists of firebox surrounded by a water jacket. Highly efficient and low emission wood pellets
are burned inside to generate heat. This heat is then circulated by pipes to the heat distribution
system of the house. Thermal storage tank is also used to avoid frequent cycling of boiler. Other
energy measures like, insulation; weatherization and improved energy management can be
used to improve efficiency of the system. The whole system configuration can be installed in
the basement or in the garages of the homes.
INSTALLATION COST & PAYBACK TIME
System capacity 40,000 BTU/LB
INSTALLATION COST $22,000
NYSERDA incentive $5,500
New cost $16,500
Thermal efficiency 85%
PAYBACK TIME 6-9 years
TABLE 6[INSTALLATION COST & PAYBACK TIME OF WOOD PELLET HEATING SYSTEM]
5.3 BIOMASS POWER PLANT
The basic technology is combustion, where direct combustion of biomass takes place through a
multi-fuel fired boiler to generate high-pressure and high-temperature steam, which in turn
drives a turbine coupled to generate the electric energy of rated. The major items of plant and
machinery consist of a travelling grate boiler with economizer, air pre-heater with electro static
THE GREEN EMPIRE STATE
1057047, K. C. PATOLIA Page 17
precipitator, a steam turbine with synchronous generator, power evacuation system and fuel
handling system.
FIGURE 8[SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF BIOMASS POWER PLANT]
GENERATION COST & PAYBACK TIME
Plant capacity 50 MW
Plant cost $8300/kw
Construction cost $415 × 106
Depreciation(straight line depreciation-30years)
$13.8× 106 /year
Interest (bond interest-4%) $16.6 × 106 /year
Operation & Maintenance(O&M=$400/kw) $20 × 106 /year
Efficiency 28%
Fuel cost($-75/ton) $ -35.47 × 106 /year
Ash(24 % @ $5/ton) $0.56 × 106 /year
Fuel tax $0.00
CO2/MWH 4160 lb. CO2 /MWH
Carbon tax $9.11 × 106 /year
Total cost $25.07 × 106 /year
Total annual output 249.6 × 106 kwhr
GENERATION COST 5.7¢/kwh
PAYBACK TIME 1.7 years
TABLE 7[GENERATION COST & PAYBACK TIME OF BIOMASS PLANT]
THE GREEN EMPIRE STATE
1057047, K. C. PATOLIA Page 18
5.4 ADVANTAGES & DISADVANTAGES
ADVANTAGES
Biomass is abundant source of energy as it comes from living sources and life is cyclical. There
are plenty of forests and agricultural residues in the NY state to be used in the production of
biomass energy. It has developed alternative source of fuel for many home owners. It can
reduce hazardous effects of landfills. There is no limit on different types of biomass as there are
so many living things on the planet. Moreover energy can be generated while reducing the
volume of waste by up to 90 percent, an environmental benefit. The overall climate change
impact of these emissions is lessened because a major component of biomass fuel is wood,
paper and food wastes that would decompose if not burned. If left to decompose in a solid
waste landfill, the material produces methane, a potent greenhouse gas.
DISADVANTAGES
Biomass plant is overall costly and inefficient investment as compared to fossil fuels. It may
create topological changes and destroy homes of countless animals. For mass production,
companies have to clear considerable forest area. It needs large area of land for both,
cultivation of biomass and installation of biomass power plant. Hunger is still major issue in
most countries of the world. In such situations, it will be difficult to prioritize producing biomass
fuel instead of feeding the nation. The incineration process may have detrimental effects on
environment as it releases carbon dioxide. MSW contains diverse mix of waste materials, some
benign and some very toxic. Such toxics pose an environmental problem if they are released
into air with plant emissions or if they are dispersed in the soil and allowed to migrate into
ground water supplies and work their way into the food chain.
THE GREEN EMPIRE STATE
1057047, K. C. PATOLIA Page 19
6. NY ELECTRICITY SCENARIO AFTER 25 YEARS AND 50 YEARS
SUMMER PEAK DEMAND 2014 33,666MW
2039 + 20% RESERVE CAPACITY 40,399.2 + 8079.8 = 48,478.8MW
2064 + 20% RESERVE CAPACITY 47,805.7 + 9,561 = 57,366.864 MW
DESIGN FOR CHANGE
BY 2039 BY 2064
OFFSET POWER PLANT TYPE CAPACITY CAPACITY
GAS 3,226MW 0MW
OIL 2,564MW 0MW
COAL 1,495 MW 0MW
GAS & OIL 5,171MW 12,456MW
TOTAL 12,456MW 12,456MW
BY RENEWABLES
RENEWABLE POWER PLANT BY 2039 BY 2064
SOLAR POWER 10,000MW 10,000MW
WIND POWER 9,000MW 6344MW
BIOMASS POWER 3,955MW 5,000MW
TOTAL 22,955MW 21,344MW
25.70%
74.30%
NEXT 25 YEARS
FOSSIL FUEL(25.7%)
RENEWABLE ENERGY(74.3%)
0%
100%
WELCOME TO WHOLE GREEN! IN 2064
FOSSIL FUEL(0%)
CLEAN FUELS(100%)
THE GREEN EMPIRE STATE
1057047, K. C. PATOLIA Page 20
7.CONCLUSION
This robust and economic frame work will be able to establish green carpet in the Empire State.
Though NY has many milestones to cross because of its changing weather and volatile energy
market, it will get enormous success in the field of clean and abundant sources of energy. The
ultimate fact about nature is that, each geographical section of the world is bestowed with one
or another types of resource, but success depends on our skills of harnessing it.
8.REFERENCES
http://www.nyserda.ny.gov/all-programs
http://www.eia.gov/state/print.cfm?sid=ny
http://www.dec.ny.gov/energy/43231.html
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/wind-turbine
http://www.newyorkbiomass.org/
http://www.ecoheatsolutions.com/heatingsolutions/woodpelletboiler.html