the good, the bad, and the framed

58
The good, the bad, and the framed A study of behavioral economics and the framing effect on tobacco free snus William Muleba Business and Economics, master's level 2020 Luleå University of Technology Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences

Upload: others

Post on 04-Jan-2022

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

The good, the bad, and the framedA study of behavioral economics and the framing effect on tobacco free snus

William Muleba

Business and Economics, master's level

2020

Luleå University of Technology

Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences

Abstract

This study sets out to explore attitudes and intentions towards nicotine product goods and how it

is affected by the goal framing effect. The presence of this effect has been shown in the advertising

of both green products and everyday products. The aim of this research is to explore whether or

not this also holds true when it comes to unhealthy products, more precisely tobacco free all white

nicotine products.

A quasi experimental study was conducted with the use of a fictitious brand of All-white tobacco.

All 63 participants in the three different experimental groups of the study met the mandatory age

requirement. One of the three groups received a positively framed advert, another received a

negatively framed advert, whereas the last group acted as the control group and therefore received

a neutral advertisement stimuli. All participants submitted their answers on a questionnaire created

for this study, which was validated using Cronbach’s alpha and factor analysis.

The results suggest that the use of goal framing is beneficial when advertising nicotine product

goods. Both positive and negative goal-framing showed a greater effect on purchase intention and

product attitude than the control group. The negative goal-framing advert proved to be statistically

different than the control group when measuring product attitude. Furthermore, the positively

framed advert showed a statistically significant difference in effect on both product attitude and

purchase intention compared to the control group.

The findings suggest that positively framed goal-framing has an effect on both attitudes and

purchase intention, compared to the neutral stimuli. The negatively framed goal-framing had an

effect on attitudes, compared to the neutral stimuli. The practical implication of this study could

possibly be that when constructing advertisements for tobacco free snus products, it could be

preferable to make use of the positive goal-framing effect in order to affect the consumers purchase

intention and attitude towards the product.

This study has confirmed to some extent that the framing effect is a factor prevalent in the

advertising of tobacco free products. For further research it would be highly interesting to delve

deeper in comparing positive and negative goal-framing in order to find further evidence of which

one has greater effect on consumers.

List of relevant keywords and authors names

“Behavioral economics”; “Goal-Framing”; “Framing effect”; “Advertising”;”Marketing”;

“Communication”; “Consumer marketing”; “Tobacco”;” Attitudes”; “Purchase intention”;

“Kahneman, Daniel” ; “Tversky, Amos”; “Thaler, Richard” ; “Sunstein, Cass”; “Shiller, Robert”

; “Ajzen, I”;“Putrevu, S” ; “Simon. A, Herbert”; “Camerer, C. F., & Loewenstein”

Table of contents

Contents 1. Introduction 1

1.1 Background 1

1.1.1 All white snus 3

1.1.2 British American Tobacco (BAT) 3

1.1.3 Japan Tobacco Inc. (JTI) - Nordic Spirit 3

1.1.4 Swedish Match - Zyn 3

1.1.5 Market figures. 4

1.2 Problem discussion 5

1.3 Research purpose 7

1.4 Research question 7

1.5 Delimitations 7

2. Literature review 8

2.1 The Evaluation system 8

2.2 Framing effect 9

2.2.1 Attribute framing 10

2.2.2 Goal framing 11

2.2.3 Temporal framing 12

2.2.4 Framing effect and advertising 13

2.3 Theory of planned behavior 14

2.3.1 Behavioral Control 15

2.3.2 Attitude toward the behavior 15

2.3.3 Subjective norm 15

2.4 Behavioral economics 16

2.5 Frame of reference 17

3. Methodology 18

3.1 Research purpose 18

3.2 Research approach 19

3.3 Deductive approach 20

3.4 Quantitative method 20

3.5 Questionnaire 22

3.6 Reliability 24

3.6.1 Factor analysis 24

3.7 Validity 25

3.8 Descriptive statistics 25

3.9 Inferential statistics 25

3.10 Manipulation checks 26

3.11 Sample selection 26

3.12 Methodology summary 28

4. Results 30

4.1 Factor analysis 30

4.2 Cronbach’s alpha 31

4.3 Descriptive statistics 32

4.4 Inferential statistics 33

4.4.1 Product attitude 34

4.4.1.1 Product attitude: Negative framing vs Neutral stimuli 34

4.4.1.2 Product attitude: Positive framing vs Neutral Stimuli 35

4.4.1.3 Product attitude: Negative framing vs positive framing 36

4.4.2 Purchase intention 37

4.4.2.1 Purchase intention: Negative framing vs Neutral stimuli 37

4.4.2.2 Purchase intention: Positive framing vs Neutral stimuli 38

4.4.2.3 Purchase intention: Negative framing vs Positive Framing 39

4.4.3 Manipulation checks 40

4.4.3.1 Negative goal-framing paired t-test 40

4.4.3.2 Positive goal-framing paired t-test 41

5. Analysis 42

6. Conclusions 44

6.1 Practical implications 45

6.2 Theoretical implications 45

6.3 Limitations 46

6.4 Suggestions for further research 47

7. Appendix 51

7.1 Appendix 1 - Questionnaire 51

1

1. Introduction

This thesis will be about behavioral economics, more precisely the framing effect and how it

affects consumers' purchase intention and attitude towards the product when purchasing harmful

goods. In this case tobacco free snus.

1.1 Background

The main objective of marketing communications is to influence the individual's perception of an

organization and its products (Baines, Fill, & Rosengren, 2017). This is most commonly done with

the use of a communication tool such as advertising and a form of media where the communication

message is delivered (Baines et al., 2017).

There are communication models that aim to describe the process of communication between

sender and receiver, i.e. organization and customer. Kotler & Keller (2016) portray one such model

called the communications process model. The authors portray a model in which the sender

encodes their message and delivers it in a form of media, the encoded message is then decoded by

the receiver followed by their response and feedback. The final component of the model is the

noise which for instance can be rival messages interfering with the communication. The goal of

advertising is to act as an external stimulus to trigger the consumers buying decision process.

(Kotler & Keller, 2016). However all consumers do not follow the linear buying decision process

model, some consumers skip a few steps and go directly to the purchase decisions. This irrational

behavior by consumers is further explored in the field of behavioral economics. (Kotler & Keller,

2016). According to Camerer and Loewenstein (2003) behavioral economics increases the

explanatory power of economics by providing it with more realistic psychological foundations.

Within behavioral economics plenty of research has been conducted on the effects of messaging

on decision making. Behavioral economics challenges certain aspects of the neoclassical view of

economics, more importantly for this thesis, the aspects of the irrationality of human decision

making (Wilkinson & Klaes, 2012). This is done by weighing in human psychology in economic

theories. This allows for greater understanding of human decision making. Two of the most

prominent authors on the subject of behavioral economics and decision making are Amos Tversky

and Daniel Kahneman, with their findings on areas such as prospect theory (Kahneman & Tversky,

1979).

2

Thanks to these findings more research has been done on decision making and what influences

individuals. Their findings include more evidence that challenges the rationality of individual

decision making, such as the framing effect (Kahneman, D., 2003).

According to Kahneman and Tversky the framing effect is a bias which appears when convictions

and preferences are gratuitously affected by the way in which a problem is formulated (Kahneman,

2013). Another explanation is that the framing effect is the idea that one part of decision making is

the way in which the problem or question is delivered. In essence the selected decision can change

depending on whether a problem is framed in terms of losses or gains. (Thaler & Sunstein, 2009).

Seeing as decision making is such a fundamental aspect of everyday life, the fact that such a simple

component as the phrasing of the problem has major influence on the outcome is interesting. It

becomes even more interesting if one considers the possible implications it has on the usage of

nicotine products.

The following section aims to highlight a few of the main competitors in the snus segment on the

Swedish market. The reason for choosing these particular companies in an effort to portray

different market participants is that they have established a considerable share of the market.

3

1.1.1 All white snus

1.1.2 British American Tobacco (BAT)

British American Tobacco has previously been focused solely on the manufacturing and sale of

cigarettes but after the acquisition of Skandinavisk Tobakskompagni in 2008 expanded into the

snus market (Avanza, 2020). The company now has a tobacco free nicotine pouch product offering

available in the US, Scandinavian and Swiss market under the product name Lyft. BAT’s market

share in the segment in Sweden as of 2018 was 12% and in Norway the market share was 8 %.(

British American Tobacco, 2020).

1.1.3 Japan Tobacco Inc. (JTI) - Nordic Spirit

Japan Tobacco Inc. is a global tobacco giant founded in 1949 and employs 61 975 people

worldwide (Japan Tobacco Inc., 2020a). JTI entered the snus market in 2007 when they acquired

Gallaher Group PLC. Their contender for market share in the tobacco free segment is the Nordic

Spirit which was launched in 2018 (Japan Tobacco Inc., 2020b) In 2019 they expanded further into

the market by making the product available in seven different countries including the UK (Japan

Tobacco Inc., 2020b).

1.1.4 Swedish Match - Zyn

Swedish Match is mainly successful in the premium segment in Sweden. In recent years they have

expanded their product portfolio to include their tobacco free nicotine pouch named Zyn. The

product is available in 67 000 stores in America and volume has increased from 12 million cans to

50 million. (Swedish Match. 2020). In 2019 the American Food and Drug administration

designated Swedish Match products to be a “Modified Risk Tobacco Product”, which is a

designation given to tobacco products considered to reduce the harm and risk of tobacco related

diseases. This results in Swedish Match being able to market its products as a less harmful

alternative than traditional tobacco products in the US. (Swedish Match. 2020).

4

1.1.5 Market figures.

The figures on snus consumption in Sweden shows that 24% of males and 7% of females use snus

on a regular basis amounting to a total of 1 million consumers. The Swedish market saw a growth

of 7% in 2019 and the Norwegian market grew by an estimated 5%. Looking at the US nicotine

pouch market the volume, measured in cans, saw a growth of 47 million cans in 2019 amounting

to 60 million cans in total. The total snus market in America amounted to 1.5 billion cans, while

showing a decline of 1% in 2019. The market of pouch snus is estimated to grow by 3% per year

in the US. (Swedish Match. 2020).

5

1.2 Problem discussion

Numerous studies have been conducted on the framing effect in various areas. Such as one study

that measured the framing effect on brand attitudes towards a fictitious brand of toothpaste. In the

experiment the messaging was manipulated as to differ between: “99% of caries removed” and

“1% of caries not removed”. (Burböck, Kubli, Maček, & Bobek, 2019). Tu, Kao, and Tu, (2013)

have done experiments on how different kinds of framing effects affect consumers in areas such as

green marketing. Buda and Zhang (2000) have done research on the prevalence of framing effect

and whether negative or positive messaging is preferable. What they found was that not only must

marketers pay attention to what they say and how they say it, they must also weigh in aspects of

product attributes when constructing the messaging. A lot has been done on theoretical aspects and

fictitious goods as well as green marketing in different areas. There have also been studies that

examine the most successful way to make individuals quit smoking, by comparing messages in

terms of losses of continued smoking or the gains of quitting. (Toll et al., 2008).

The utilization of advertisement for the tobacco industry has been substantial throughout the ages.

A common aspect of movies in the past has been the notion that cigarette usage has been a common

component. The advertisement of tobacco products is ever changing, flowing from different claims

of health benefits of smoking to risk reduction. As regulation of the advertisement of nicotine and

smoking products becomes stricter the companies must find new ways to market their products.

As the studies of the negative health consequences associated with cigarettes shifted the sentiment

towards reducing the demand for cigarette products, new opportunities for revenue have emerged.

One such area are the various forms of reduced-risk products on offer from some of the largest

cigarette manufacturers. Some tobacco companies have chosen vaping as their alternative in the

reduced risk segment (PMI, 2020). Others have gone for the All white snus alternative. All white

snus is an oral alternative to nicotine users. Free from tobacco and is therefore considered by the

American regulators to be less harmful than other oral counterparts and particularly less harmful

than cigarettes (Swedish Match. 2020). Investments in the all-white snus segment increases as

shown previously in the market analysis. As previously mentioned there have been studies

conducted on cigarette cessation but this brand new segment of nicotine consumption has not been

studied as carefully as cigarettes or vaping. To some extent the research on the prevalence of the

framing effect in the field of advertising nicotine products is seemingly nonexistent. Is there a

framing effect even for the goods that have an inherently negative aspect of their own? Goods that

are viewed as detrimental to health and even have addictive characteristics. Do the implications of

6

the framing effect hold true even there and if so does it affect attitudes and purchase intentions of

those reached by the advertising. Therefore the aim of this research is to explore whether or not

the same sort of theoretical aspects that are true when it comes to green products or everyday

products also hold true when it comes to unhealthy products, more precisely tobacco free all white

nicotine products.

7

1.3 Research purpose

This study sets out to explore attitudes and intentions towards nicotine product goods and how it is

affected by the goal framing effect.

1.4 Research question

Research question: Is there a framing effect when advertising tobacco free snus?

Hypothesis: There is a significant difference in effect on attitudes and intention between using

positive or negative goal-framing when advertising tobacco free snus products.

H0:μ1 – μ2 = 0 There is no significant difference in effect on attitudes and intention between using

positive or negative goal-framing when advertising tobacco free snus products

1.5 Delimitations

The delimitations are that this study will only focus on the Swedish market and that of tobacco free

snus products. Because of the present COVID-19 pandemic the ways of administering the

questionnaire in order to collect a data sample will be affected. The preferred way of administering

the questionnaire where the researcher is positioned in a central position on campus and hands out

the questionnaire to subjects that pass through the area is not suitable in the current situation as it

is considered a health hazard and the university is in lockdown. Therefore alternative ways of

questionnaire administration is adopted, which could affect the quality and size of the sample,

seeing as the randomization of the administration and thus sample is limited.

8

2. Literature review

The chapter contains a review of past literature regarding behavioral economics. The purpose of

this literature review is to establish the main theoretical area. The aim is to find articles and

mediums that are most relevant for the research purpose.

2.1 The Evaluation system

Jobber and Lancaster (2015) present a system that details the different steps involved with the

consumers’ selection and evaluation of different choices for the best solution. This system is

presented in figure 1 below.

Figure 1: Evaluation system

Source: Adapted from Jobber & Lancaster

(2015)

The system consists of four different components, more specifically; (1) the evaluative criteria

which are dimensions used to evaluate products by the consumers. (2) Beliefs, which are whether

or not a product holds certain characteristics according to the consumer. (3) Attitudes, which are

described by Jobber and Lancaster as liking or disliking a product, furthermore the authors state

that attitudes are dependent on the evaluative criteria. And lastly (4) intentions, which are described

as a measurement of the probability that the attitudes are put into action.

The evaluation system by Jobber and Lancaster (2015) is a valuable addition to the thesis seeing

as the authors also state the assumption that favorable attitudes increase the purchase intentions.

Evaluative Criteria

Beliefs

Attitudes

Intentions

9

2.2 Framing effect

As previously explained in the introduction, the framing effect is a bias which appears when

convictions and preferences are gratuitously affected by the way in which a problem is formulated

(Kahneman, Daniel, 2013). There are different variations of framing effects.

Levin, Schneider, and Gaeth (1998) have developed a typology to distinguish three different kinds

of valence framing effects; (1) risky choice framing, (2) attribute framing and (3) goal framing.

The authors define valence framing effects as frames that present the same information in either a

positive or negative way. They first present risky choice framing, which is introduced by Tversky

& Kahneman (1981) where the result of a potential choice involving options with different risk

levels are described in different ways. Levin, Schneider and Gaeth (1998) present a second form

of the framing effect that they call the attribute framing effect. Wherein certain characteristics of

an object or event is the focus of the actual framing manipulation. The third and final form of

framing effect introduced in the article is the goal framing effect, where the framing is the goal of

an action or behavior. Examples of attribute framing and goal framing will follow in the segment

below.

10

2.2.1 Attribute framing

When certain attributes are the subject for framing manipulation it is defined as attribute framing

(Levin et al., 1998). Studies by Levin, Schneider and Gaeth (1998) on the attribute framing effect

on the labeling of beef compared the labeling of minced meat, 75% lean and 25% fat and found

that the positive labeling 75% lean resulted in better rating for the product. There are other options

such as the choice between survival rates or mortality rates when suggesting medical treatments

(Wilson, Kaplan, & Schneiderman, 1987). What the studies show is that in order to retain a

favorable rating a positive attribute frame is to be chosen instead of a negative attribute frame. In

Figure 2 below, the attribute framing process is presented. The figure displays the importance of

the process of whether or not to use the positive frame, and highlight the chance of success, or the

negative frame and highlight the risk of failure.

Figure 2: Attribute framing effect paradigm

Source: Adapted from Levin et al (1998)

11

2.2.2 Goal framing

According to Levin et al. (1998) goal framing is concerned with focusing on the consequences of

performing an action. This means that the positive goal frame is centered on gaining something

whereas the negative goal frame is centered on losing something. For instance when looking at

smoking cessation, the positive goal frame could be the health benefits gained by quitting and the

negative goal frame could be the functional health loss associated with not quitting smoking.

According to research on goal framing, laying emphasis on the negative consequences of not

performing an action has the most effect. This supposedly is because of the fact that individuals

are more inclined to avoid losses. (Meyerowitz & Chaiken, 1987). Contradictory to their findings,

studies conducted by Burböck et al. (2019) showed that positive goal framing had the most effect.

Figure 3 below maps the process of determining the effect of the goal framing, where the choice is

between the positively framed option where the gain of performing an action is highlighted versus

the loss consequence of not performing the behavior is highlighted in the negative frame.

Figure 3: Basic goal framing paradigm.

Source: Adapted from Levin et al (1998)

The two different framing effects attribute framing and goal framing were measured by Burböck,

Kubli, Maček, and Bobek, (2019) on three different parameters: purchase intentions, product

attitude and ad favorability. The authors conducted experiments with a fictitious brand of

12

toothpaste. The messaging of the advertising was alternated between different positive and negative

frames when comparing attribute and goal framing. As in 99% caries removed in the positive

attribute frame and 1% of caries not removed in the negative attribute frame. The authors phrased

the positive goal frame with the sentence “using dentagold leads to fresh breath and white teeth”.

The negative goal frame was phrased with the sentence “not using dentagold can lead to bad breath

and yellow teeth”. Results showed that both attribute and goal framing was most preferable when

framed in a positive way. The authors conclude that the content of the messaging alone is not what

influences decision behavior but how the message is presented to the consumer.

2.2.3 Temporal framing

Studies have also been conducted by Kees (2011) on the time aspect of framing, described as

temporal framing which is when a temporal aspect is applied to a neutral reference point. For

example instead of the message being that a lot of people die from cancer, the temporal aspect of

“every hour” or “daily” is added to the message. In his research he investigated individuals with

an inability to properly assess the future consequences of their behavior. More specifically their

consumption of unhealthy food items. He discovered that present-oriented consumers were more

susceptible to messages of long term risk if they were framed in a more proximal way, also his

studies suggest framing long term risk messaging in a promotion frame rather than a prevention

frame.

13

2.2.4 Framing effect and advertising

In an attempt to research the applicability and effect of the framing effect in advertising

Tu, Kao, and Tu (2013) examined the framing effect and green marketing on green advertising.

The study found a preference of positively framed green product advertising over negatively

framed advertising. Their findings are supported by Tversky and Kahneman (1981) who propose

that individual preference is concise advertisements and with a risk averse attitude when presented

with positive frames based on gaining something. In another study on the effectiveness of framing

effects on ad messaging, Lee, Liu, and Cheng (2018) found results that indicate that ads where

messages were positively framed are more effective than those with messages that are negatively

framed for consumers who are promotion-focused. They also examined product types such as

utilitarian products and hedonic products and found that it is more effective to match the framing

of the message with the advertised products. Furthermore, Buda and Zhang (2000) examined the

interactive effect of message framing, presentation order and source credibility. They examined

this through experiments, the experiments showed that those who received a positively framed

message rated product attitudes significantly more positive than those who received a negatively

framed message. They found an indication that there was significant influence on consumer’s

decisions from the framing effect.

So far awareness has been raised that the framing effect appears to be effective and applicable to

different products and scenarios. The authors have researched some interesting topics and found

indications that support their claims for the product categories and the influence on consumer’s

decisions. The following segment will attempt to present the current state of the research on human

behavior.

14

2.3 Theory of planned behavior

Understanding human behavior in different contexts has been the interest of many scholars

throughout the ages. Icek Ajzen, together with Martin Fishbein have studied and proposed ways of

understanding human behavior. One such proposal is the theory of planned behavior, which is built

on the theory of reasoned action (Ajzen, 1991). Ajzen (1991) states that the theory of planned

behavior is: “…a theory designed to predict and explain human behavior in specific contexts”

(p.181). The theory achieves this by viewing intentions as central to the performance of behavior.

Intentions are explained as the antecedents of behavior that encapsulate various motivators, simply

put it’s more likely that a behavior is performed if the intentions are strong. In an effort to highlight

the different components that influence behavior they are included in the figure 4 below, in an

adaptation of the theory of planned behavior.

Figure 4: Theory of planned behavior

Source: Adapted from Ajzen (1991)

15

2.3.1 Behavioral Control

In an attempt to dissect the different components of the theory of planned behavior the first step

will be to examine behavioral control. Azjen (1991) explains behavioral control by first separating

actual behavioral control and perceived behavioral control, where perceived behavioral control

concerns the perception of the individual's ability to perform the behavior in question. Perceived

behavioral control is also presented as different from the theory of locus of control. The difference

being that perceived behavioral control has a variance depending on the situation whereas locus of

control remains relatively stable (Ajzen, 1991). In order to further explain the difference between

locus of control and perceived behavioral control Ajzen (1991) presents an example where an

individuals perceived behavioral control can be low, in the case of the chances of becoming a pilot

but at the same time the individual can have a belief that the outcomes are determined by the

individual's behavior, and thus having an internal locus of control. The theory of planned behavior

states that it is possible to predict behavioral achievement with perceived behavioral control

together with behavioral intentions.

2.3.2 Attitude toward the behavior

The second determinant component of intention is the attitude toward the behavior. This

component concerns the individual's evaluation of the behavior and whether it is unfavorable or

favorable (Azjen, 1991). There is a difference between attitude toward objects and attitude toward

behavior. The former stems from beliefs that are associations with other attributes with for instance

other objects. The latter are beliefs tied to certain outcomes of performing the behavior. Behavior

that has desirable consequences is favored while behavior that is associated with undesirable

consequences is unfavored. (Ajzen, 1991).

2.3.3 Subjective norm

The third component is the subjective norm which is the perception of the social pressure regarding

whether or not to perform the behavior in question (Ajzen, 1991). One approach in order to measure

the subjective norm is to question respondents regarding to what extent the approval or disapproval

of performing a given behavior could be acquired from important others (Azjen, 1991).

16

2.4 Behavioral economics

Costa, Carvalho, & Moreira, Bruno César de Melo (2019) define behavioral economics as the

process of including psychological aspects into the decision-making process of economics. The

field of behavioral finance is a branch from behavioral economics, which they found in their

bibliometric analysis. Where they found the first works on behavioral economics being published

in 1967 whereas the behavioral finance works first saw the light of day in 1987. Also they found

that, measured in citations among the sample, the most prominent authors were Amos Tversky and

Daniel Kahneman. Perhaps the most interesting aspect of their bibliometric analysis is the fact that

among commonly addressed subject’s practical implications of irrational behavior is

underrepresented.

According to Camerer and Loewenstein (2003) the core fundamentals of behavioral economics is

a foundation on which theoretical insights are generated which allows for better predictions of field

phenomena, this is done by increasing the realism of the psychological underpinnings of economic

analysis (Camerer, Loewenstein. 2003). In their book they present the common research scheme in

behavioral economics. The first step is to identify normative models with widespread use within

economics. The second step is to identify anomalies which are not attributed to alternative

explanations. Followed by that is the third step which is to employ the anomalies in the creation of

generalized alternatives for current models. Lastly the fourth step is to use the alternative models

in the third step to test the new economic behavioral models. (Camerer, Loewenstein, 2003).

17

2.5 Frame of reference

In order to further investigate the practical implications of the irrational behavior, which was found

to be underrepresented in the bibliometric analysis by Costa, Carvalho, & Moreira, Bruno César

de Melo (2019), and to successfully provide another perspective on the framing effect and

advertising, a frame of reference has been created within the literature review. The following model

intends to visualize the frame of reference and the intended areas that are to be studied in this thesis.

Starting with the framing effect from behavioral economics and specifically the goal framing which

will be examined through manipulating advertising which is a form of communication. The

manipulated communication will be reviewed to see if it has successfully had an effect on the

attitudes of the survey respondents which could lead to a change in their purchase intention which

is a result of their attitudes. The study does not aim to research actual behavior only behavioral

intentions, seeing as in order to measure behavior an actual purchase would have to take place.

Therefore the frame of reference is illustrated as follows in figure 5 below.

Figure 5: Frame of reference

Source: Authors own construct

18

3. Methodology

3.1 Research purpose

In the effort to conduct research successfully one must first come to an understanding of the actual

purpose of the study. The following are common research purposes and corresponding examples

as introduced by Black (1999); explorative research purposes answers questions such as “Which

characteristics or details relate to observed events, phenomena or reasoning?” Explorative studies

might have a research question that examines if there is a relationship between age and perception

of quality of music. The second research purpose example introduced by Black (1999) is the

descriptive purpose. The descriptive purpose investigates aspects such as: What? Or How? For

instance it might examine events that are occurring or the prevalence of a phenomena. An example

of such a research question is: “How prevalent are sleep disorders among middle management

personnel?” The third common research purpose is the explanatory purpose. Explanatory research

examines causes of an observed outcome. The main interest of such research lies in causal

relationships and testing them. The effects of independent variables on dependent variables is a

key concept of explanatory research. One example that is portrayed by Black (1999) is: “Which

side of the brain is predominantly responsible for computer mouse manipulation?”

This research purpose is explanatory. The reason for choosing an explanatory purpose is since the

main interest of the study is to examine causes of the outcome of the experiment. Seeing as the

purpose of the study is to examine the causal relationship of framing effect on human behavior.

19

3.2 Research approach

After formulating and classifying the research question one must decide on an appropriate approach

that contains the correct tools in order to answer said question. Below is a few such approaches as

portrayed by Black (1999);

Descriptive statistics involves the descriptive presentation of quantitative data. One form of

descriptive presentation is in a graph or a chart. The downside with descriptive statistics according

to Black (1999) is that causal and correlational relationships cannot be formed with descriptive

statistics. Black (1999) also presents the correlative approach. The correlative approach is a

quantitative approach where relationships are measured in pairs of variables in order to find out if

and how they vary to one and other. The correlative approach inherits the same downsides as

descriptive statistics in the form of its inability to show causality. Lastly Black (1999) presents the

experimental/quasi-experimental approach. The experimental/quasi-experimental approach is the

approach when the aim is to manage variables in controlled environments in order to achieve

causality. Black (1999) points out that in environments when the sampling is not completely

random the generalizability is reduced and the experiment is then referred to as quasi experimental.

The approach of this thesis will endeavor to be experimental seeing as causality between variables

are of interest and generalizability of the results is the goal. However some measures of descriptive

and inferential statistics will be involved in analyzing the data. When the delimitations of the study

are taken into the consideration of research approach the chosen approach will likely be quasi-

experimental.

20

3.3 Deductive approach

When choosing a research approach there are a few paths to choose between. There is induction

which is described by Black (1999) as a process where relationships are proposed lastly, after

observations and data is collected. This is also referred to as theory building. On the other hand

there is deduction, in the sense that relationships are firstly proposed and the data is then collected

in an effort to test theory. Since this thesis is built upon established theories of behavioral

economics and previous studies in the area and aims to test the applicability in a specific scenario

it is recognized as a deductive approach.

3.4 Quantitative method

Seeing as this thesis will include experiments where the responses will be collected through

questionnaires resulting in numerical data the chosen method is quantitative, as opposed to

qualitative. Qualitative methods are concerned with aspects that are described with words and are

usually used for deep thorough research of a narrow topic (Eliasson, 2010). Two common forms

of collecting qualitative data are through observations and interviews. According to Eliasson

(2010) qualitative methods are primarily suitable because of their flexible nature, seeing as the

researcher is able to combine methods of gathering data, prolonging the data collection until they

see fit, and when the researcher wants to investigate contexts that demand an understanding that

becomes clear as the research proceeds. According to Eliasson (2010) quantitative methods are

especially suitable for making generalizations from smaller groups which is also the one of the

aims of this thesis. Furthermore Eliasson (2010) explains that when comparing quantitative and

qualitative research, qualitative research is regarded as more in depth which makes it less

generalizable. Whereas quantitative research is broader which allows for generalizations from for

instance small groups to larger groups.

One way of collecting quantitative data is through the use of questionnaires. Eliasson (2010) states

that a well-constructed questionnaire contains questions that emanate from variables that emerge

from the operationalization. Eliasson (2010) also suggests the following benefits for using a

quantitative method: The post-process is relatively quick, a well-structured questionnaire allows

for a computer based codification. Quantitative methods allow for results that are generalizable,

that speak for larger groups. Even though the resources might only allow for a smaller study of a

smaller group. (Eliasson, 2010).

21

Two common methods to collect quantitative data is either by conducting interviews or by

conducting a survey. These two methods have one thing in common and that is the use of

questionnaires. As previously mentioned the questionnaire is created emanating from the variables

that are to be researched in the thesis. The bottom line is that the aim of the research methodology

should aim to acquire as many answers as possible considering the resources available. Of the two

methods, interviews are considered more resource demanding. It is also susceptible to whether or

not the interviewer is able to reach the subject at a good time. The benefits of an interview are that

a successful interview tends to generate plenty of answers and it also gives the interviewer to

explain the questions if need be. The fact that the interviewer has knowledge of how to fill in the

questionnaire means that the reliability is increased when conducting interviews. (Eliasson, 2010).

When conducting a survey the main benefits are the time and money saved seeing as there are

many digital solutions available that offer online surveys. Another important benefit compared to

interviews is that the recipient can choose when to take part of the survey at a time that suits them

(Eliasson, 2010).

There are of course downsides even with surveys and the main downside is the fact that the

response ratio is quite low. However this can be mitigated in a number of ways, one solution is to

send reminders to the recipients and encourage them to answer the survey. There is also an

increased risk of misunderstandings as far as understanding the questions of the questionnaire. The

amount of misunderstanding is difficult to remove completely but one can make an effort to create

a survey that is as understandable as possible in order to increase the response ratio. One way of

making sure that the survey is understandable and free from misunderstandings is to test the survey

with a smaller sample in order to rule out and mend any misconceptions. (Eliasson, 2010).

22

3.5 Questionnaire

A questionnaire was created with questions adapted from the questionnaire used by Burböck et al.

(2019). The reason for adapting a previously used questionnaire is that the experiment that it was

used in has high similarity with this study and it will measure similar variables. The construction

of questionnaires is a detailed task and requires careful testing of constructs and measurements in

order to reach validity (Black, 1999). The questionnaire in question can be viewed in the appendix

1. The questionnaire contained 11 questions in total. Three of the questions were regarding

purchase intention, they were: “I would buy this product”, “I would advise my friend to buy the

product”, and “I would buy this product even if I already possess another one”. The following three

questions measured the respondents' attitude towards the product; “The product indicates high-

quality”, “The product seems valuable”, “The product seems attractive”.

Also two questions were included in the questionnaire in order to measure the effectiveness of the

framing manipulation, they were; “The advertisement outlines the product in a rather positive light”

and “The advertisement outlines the product in a rather negative light”. Respondents entered their

response on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from strongly agree (1), to strongly disagree (7). Of the

remaining three questions, one was regarding snus usage, the remaining two were classificatory

questions regarding age and gender.

The self-reported perception of the framing manipulation was adopted from studies conducted by

Lee & Aaker (2004). Similarly to the manipulation checks carried out by Meyerowitz & Chaiken

(1987) the ones in this thesis also measured the negative and positive perception of the framing

sample with two scales and 7-point Likert scales. The method used for examining the results of the

manipulation checks will be elaborated on further in the data analysis section of the methodology

below.

In order to make sure that the questionnaire captured the response on the variables measured in an

accurate way, a variety of preexisting questionnaires were acquired and adapted. Similar studies

conducted by Scott B. MacKenzie, Richard J. Lutz, & George E. Belch (1986) were measured on

three scales. In the experiments the authors measured overall feeling towards a product and

probability of using the product using three scales and a 7 point Likert on each variable. (Scott B.

MacKenzie et al., 1986). As previously mentioned the same notion of measuring attitude and

intention using a 7 point Likert scale and capturing the answers using three scales for each variable

23

was adopted in the questionnaire for this thesis. Furthermore, attitude towards a brand was

measured with three scales and a 7 point Likert scale in an experiment by Lee & Aaker (2004). The

difference compared to this study is that the scales in their study ranged from negative-positive,

favorable-unfavorable and bad-good. (Lee & Aaker, 2004). Whereas in this study the range was

the same for all scales, strongly agree-strongly disagree. Similar purchase intention measurements

were used by Putrevu (2010) who also measured purchase intention with three scales using bipolar

7-point Likert scales. Also, these scales were tested using Cronbach’s alpha to make sure they

measure their internal consistency (Black, 1999). The alpha ratings for the scales were 0,88 to 0,96,

which was deemed acceptable by Putrevu, (2010). Similar measurements for internal consistency

and factor analysis will be expanded upon below.

24

3.6 Reliability

One important aspect when conducting an experiment of any sort is whether or not it is possible to

conduct the same experiment again and achieve the same result. If it is possible to perform it several

times resulting in the same outcome, then the experiment has high reliability (Eliasson, 2010).

Eliasson (2010) describes reliability as whether or not it is possible to trust that the investigation

outputs the same result after being repeated in as similar circumstances as possible. Furthermore

Eliasson (2010) also states that reliability increases when the results are repeatable. Eliasson (2010)

suggests three key concepts that help to increase reliability: Firstly by measuring the most

important variables in several different ways, so for instance in a questionnaire multiple questions

can aim to measure the same variable. Secondly, being well prepared before starting the research.

This regards such aspects as having clear instructions and routines for how the investigation should

be carried out. Lastly making sure that when the data is coded and registered that it is not registered

incorrectly. Seeing as this thesis is using a questionnaire one important aspect that will be taken

into account is the reliability of the questions. The internal consistency of the questionnaire will be

measured by using Cronbach’s alpha. According to Black (1999) Cronbach’s coefficient is an

indicator of internal consistency and can be used for questionnaires using scales. A Cronbach

coefficient equal to or above 0,68 is considered moderately reliable (Black, 1999).

3.6.1 Factor analysis

A factor analysis was conducted in order to test construct validity (Black, 1999).

In order to analyze the construct validity all questions from the questionnaire were loaded into

Minitab for computing. The first three variables were extracted from questions regarding purchase

intention, the variables after were extracted from questions regarding attitude towards the product.

Part of the aim of the factor analysis is to test how much of the variability can be explained by a

factor (Minitab, 2019). For this questionnaire two factors were thought to be present, namely

purchase intention and attitude towards product, however a three factor analysis was conducted in

order to rule out the presence of a third factor. In table 1 of the results chapter, one of three factor

analyses is presented. The similarities between the three factor analyses was high and therefore it

seemed suitable to present one as an example of the method used in this thesis. The factor analysis

will be further analyzed in the results chapter.

In essence, the researcher wants to perform the research in a way that it is possible to redo the

experiment and acquire the same results again, as previously mentioned this increases the

25

reliability. Eliasson (2010) states that increased reliability improves the conditions for high validity.

Validity will be discussed in the following section.

3.7 Validity

Another important aspect when conducting an experiment is whether or not the experiment is

measuring what the experiment is intended to measure, this is considered to be the main aspect of

validity according to Eliasson (2010). Further Eliasson (2010) presents two key aspects to increase

validity. The first key is to make sure that the operational definitions of the concepts match theory

as closely as possible. The second key aspect is to design indicators for the concepts used in the

research.

3.8 Descriptive statistics

Descriptive statistics was used to grasp the basic results of the collected data. With the use of

descriptive statistics information such as the demographic of the respondents and the amount of

current users can be presented. Also, thanks to the demographic data, the criteria that the

respondents are of the required age of 18+ can be met.

3.9 Inferential statistics

In order to analyze the results statistical significance inferential statistics was used, specifically a

two sample t-test. These actions were conducted in a statistical software, in this case Minitab. The

sample mean of the differently framed advertising stimuli was compared to examine any

differences and their statistical significance. In order to view the effect the variables product

attitude and purchase intention were chosen. As previously mentioned, each variable had data

collected by using three questions on each subject. The individual's response on each topic was

summarized to create two variables which were purchase intention and product attitude. The mean

of each of these variables were then compared between questionnaires to measure whether or not

there was an effect of the framing. For the testing the confidence interval (90%) was used and the

significance level 10% was chosen, seeing as it is common within social sciences (Black, 1999).

26

3.10 Manipulation checks

In accordance with the manipulation check performed by Burböck et al. (2019) where the success

of the framing was measured using a paired t-test, the same testing was used in this thesis. The

aim of the manipulation check is to examine the success of the framing, so for instance, when

examining the perception of the negatively framed experiment the expected outcome is that it is

perceived as negative.

3.11 Sample selection

In order to make generalizable statements about a group of individuals there are certain limitations

that need to be taken into consideration. For instance, the larger the group that is to be generalized

the larger the study needs to be. Seeing as the timeframe of this study does not allow for a study of

large magnitude where the entire population of a country is part of the study, since that would be

too costly and require too large of a data collection, a suitable sample selection has to be

constructed. Eliasson (2010) states that in order to make a statement about a population, the use of

a sampling is needed. According to Eliasson (2010) a sampling is a complete list of a population,

which in the case of this thesis could be the students at LTU.

From the sampling a sample is then drawn. When constructing a complete list of a population in

the sampling there are criteria that can be taken into consideration in order to make the sampling

as complete as possible (Eliasson, 2010). If the example of the students at LTU is used, imagine

that the goal is to construct a complete list of students at LTU, a criteria can be added that needs to

be met in order to make the list. One important criteria here would be that they are still students at

the university, another important criteria is that they meet the age restriction of 18 that is set on

tobacco products. By making sure that there are different criteria’s that can vastly improve the

sampling, the sample will in turn also be vastly improved. (Eliasson, 2010).

Another aspect that needs to be taken into consideration is the probability of the sampling, where

one takes into account the probability of each individual from the sampling to be chosen for the

study (Eliasson, 2010). According to Eliasson (2010) the reason for using probability sampling is

that the sample is given the ability to speak for the population. Eliasson (2010) describes four

different kinds of probability sampling. Firstly there is the simple random selection in which every

individual has the same probability to be a part of the study. If the aim is to speak for the entirety

of the population then the simple random sample will result in the highest credibility and reliability,

27

the downside is that if there are smaller groups within the sampling then they risk being left out of

the sample. Secondly there is the stratified sample where the population is stratified into groups

before the sample is drawn from each of them. This is especially useful when one wants to take

into consideration the difference in size of the different groups in the population in order to make

sure that they are equally represented in the sample. Thirdly there is the cluster sampling, where

the population is divided into clusters from which a sample is then drawn from some of the clusters.

The benefit of cluster sampling according to Eliasson (2010) is if there is a difficulty to create a

complete sampling, the disadvantage is that there is no way to accurately project the probability of

each individual in the sample and therefore the ability for the sample to speak for the population is

lost.

Since the aim of the study is to achieve a result which can speak for a population the chosen

sampling method is a probability sampling. Seeing as it is possible to create a complete sampling

with the resources available in the form of a mailing list of students at LTU and making sure that

that list meets the different set criteria’s, a simple random selection will be used. The sample size

of each experiment group will be 35 which gives a total sample size of 105 seeing as there will be

three experiment groups. Stutely (2003) refers to a sample size of 30 as suitable for hypothesis

testing.

28

3.12 Methodology summary

The first step of this research was to construct a testable hypothesis. The second step was to craft

an experiment that tests the hypothesis. In the experiments a suitable sample size of participants

was chosen according to the theory of what suits this particular study. The participants were then

randomly assigned into three groups. The first group was given negatively framed advertising

stimuli which constitutes the first independent variable. The negative goal-framing sentence was

phrased as: ”By not using “Pure” you risk getting discolored teeth and bad breath, compared to

traditional oral tobacco”. The second group was given positively framed advertising stimuli which

constitutes the second independent variable. The positive goal-framing sentence was phrased as:

”By using “Pure” you avoid the risk of getting discolored teeth and bad breath, compared to

traditional oral tobacco”. The third group is the control group who will be given a neutral

advertising stimuli in order to rule out any interference and to be able to safely say that the answers

of the two other groups are because of the stimuli. The phrasing of the goal-framing in stimuli was

adapted from a similar study conducted by Burböck et al., (2019). In figure 6 below the

experimental design is visualized.

Figure 6: Experimental design

Source: Authors own construct

29

The different groups will be given a questionnaire that measures their attitudes towards the product

and purchase intention of the specific product which constitutes the dependent variable of the

thesis. The questionnaire will be assembled in accordance with theory in a way that attempts to

ensure as good of a response as possible on the measured attitudes and purchase intention. The

questionnaires will then be collected and the data will be gathered and analyzed using descriptive

and inferential statistics.

Sampling will be people over 18 since the products are age restricted. Seeing as in the current

situation the most available participants who are able to act as respondents in this study will be

students this is also for reasons of account research cost. They will be reached by email. The

mailing lists will be collected from LTU's administrative personnel.

In this experiment a fictitious brand of tobacco free snus will be created in order to rule out already

established attitudes towards an existing brand. Also there will be no images of the product

included in order to further diminishing preexisting attitudes towards existing brands. The stimuli

in the experiment will be assembled to resemble an original ad.

30

4. Results

4.1 Factor analysis

In table 1 below, the factor analysis conducted in order to test the validity of the constructs is

presented

Table 1: Factor analysis

Rotated Factor Loadings and Communalities Equimax Rotation

Variable Factor1 Factor2 Factor3 Communality

Recoded 0IBUY 0,185 0,951 -0,012 0,938

Recoded 0Ubuy 0,388 0,694 0,104 0,643

Recoded 0buymore 0,357 0,812 -0,045 0,789

Recoded 0HQ 0,848 0,263 -0,292 0,874

Recoded 0valuable 0,895 0,376 -0,137 0,962

Recoded 0attractive 0,856 0,370 -0,281 0,949

Recoded 0positive 0,171 0,014 -0,952 0,936

Recoded 0negative -0,177 0,056 0,939 0,917

Variance 2,6275 2,3948 1,9851 7,0074

% Var 0,328 0,299 0,248 0,876

The factor analysis presents the rotated factor loading. The factor analysis was rotated using an

equimax rotation in order to make it easier to discern patterns between the variables, the choice of

the equimax rotation was subjective, seeing as it was deemed most suitable (Minitab, 2019). There

are a few ways to interpret the data of the factor analysis. The ones used in this thesis are;

communality, variance, % var and explanatory power of the factors.

Firstly looking at the explanatory power of the factors, the unrotated data showed that the variance

of factor three was below 1. This is below the recommended threshold and therefore factor three

was deemed to be poor as a factor that explains the variability in the data. However after performing

the equimax rotation the variance is altered, although the variance of factor three is still lower than

the other two factors. (Minitab, 2019).

Secondly when viewing the % var, which is described as the factor's ability to explain the

proportion of variability in the data, the lowest %var can be seen in factor 3. (Minitab, 2019)

31

Lastly the communality presented in table 1 is considered to be good, the closer the communality

is to 1, the better the variable is explained by the factor (Minitab, 2019).

In conclusion the factor analysis shows as intended, that the first three variables are explained by

factor 2, which is then considered to be the purchase intention factor. In turn factor 1 explains the

other three variables, which is considered to be the attitude towards the product. The presence of a

factor 3 is thereby ruled out since the different thresholds were not met for a third factor to be

present.

4.2 Cronbach’s alpha

In table 2 below, the testing results for the Cronbach’s alpha measuring internal consistency is

presented. Table 2: Cronbach’s alpha

In order to measure the internal consistency Cronbach’s coefficient was used. The testing

grouped the questions according to variables. The first three variables are questions regarding

purchase intention (PI). The Cronbach alpha rating for all questions regarding PI are all above the

threshold of 0,68 and are therefore deemed to have very strong internal consistency. The

remaining three variables are questions regarding product attitude (PA). Also these questions are

above the threshold of 0,68 and are deemed to have very strong internal consistency. For all the

questions tested the results ranged from 0,85 to 0,95 which indicates very strong internal

consistency and a highly reliable test.

32

4.3 Descriptive statistics

In Table 3, the descriptive statistics is presented. The descriptive statistics shows that the total

respondents was 63. The distribution between the genders saw a slight majority of male

respondents. The amount of users are roughly even between the surveys except for the neutral

survey where the non-users were a clear majority.

Table 3: Descriptive statics

According to the means and standard deviations of the respondent’s age, the mean age was

approximately 25 and according to the data set none of the respondents were below the age of 18

which was a predetermined required criteria.

33

4.4 Inferential statistics

In accordance with the frame reference where attitudes are portrayed as an antecedent to

intentions, the results will be presented starting with product attitude followed by purchase

intention.

The following section will compare the differences of the mean (X) between surveys in order to

examine the statistical significance of the difference of the product attitude and purchase intention.

In order to measure the statistical significance of the differences between the sample’s product

attitude and purchase intention variable three two sample t-tests were conducted.

Equal variance was assumed seeing as the samples were of the equal size, by assuming equal

variance the power of the two sample t-test is increased. The chosen confidence interval for the test

was 90% seeing as the sample size was not large enough for a 95% confidence interval where the

limit is a sample size of approximately n=30. Seeing as the confidence interval is lower, the chances

of the population Mean to be contained in the interval is lowered. Chosen significance level (⍺) for

this study was 10% which is common in social sciences. When executing the test the statistical

significance of the difference will be measured using a p-value. If the p-value is lower than the

significance level (⍺) 10% the null hypothesis is rejected. This is commonly

formatted as p-value ≤0,1. All of the tests were conducted as one-

tailed tests seeing as the aim was to review which of the framing

samples showed the greatest effect.

34

4.4.1 Product attitude

4.4.1.1 Product attitude: Negative framing vs Neutral stimuli

In table 4 below the two sample t-test examining the statistical significance of the difference

between negative framing and the neutral stimuli is presented

Table 4: Two sample t-test Product attitude: Negative vs Neutral

When comparing the mean (X) of the negative sample 4,079X with that of the neutral sample

3,587X the difference was 0,492 with a p-value of 0,026. The p-value is below the ⍺ of 0,1, the

null hypothesis H₀: μ₁ - µ₂ = 0 is rejected in consideration for the alternative hypothesis H₁: μ₁ - µ₂

> 0. This test result suggests that the difference between negatively framed advertising and the

neutral stimuli is statistically significant, which suggests that negative framing has an effect on

product attitude.

35

4.4.1.2 Product attitude: Positive framing vs Neutral Stimuli

Table 5 below contains the two sample t-test that examines the statistical significance of the

difference between the means of the positive framing and the neutral stimuli.

Table 5: Two sample t-test Product attitude: Positive vs Neutral

The next comparison was between the positive sample and the neutral sample. In the test the

difference of the mean of the positive sample 4,000X and the neutral sample 3,587 X was 0,4127.

The significance of this difference was 0,006 which is below the ⍺ of 0,1 which enables a rejection

of the null hypothesis H₀: μ₁ - µ₂ = 0 in consideration for the alternative hypothesis H₁: μ₁ - µ₂ > 0.

This test result suggests that the difference between positively framed advertising and the neutral

stimuli is statistically significant, which suggests that positive framing has an effect on product

attitude.

36

4.4.1.3 Product attitude: Negative framing vs positive framing

In table 6 below the two sample t-test which examines the statistical significance of the difference

between the means of the negative framing sample and the positive framing sample is presented.

Table 6: Two sample t-test Product attitude: Negative vs Positive

The final test on product attitude examined the difference of the negative sample mean 4,079X and

the positive sample mean 4,000X, which was 0,079 at a significance level of 0,343. This p-value

is higher than the accepted significance level and therefore there is a failure to reject the null

hypothesis H₀: μ₁ - µ₂ = 0. Seeing as the null hypothesis could not be rejected, the test was unable

to conclusively show statistical significance of the difference between negative and positive

framing in effect on product attitude.

37

4.4.2 Purchase intention

4.4.2.1 Purchase intention: Negative framing vs Neutral stimuli

In Table 7 below the two-sample t-test comparing the difference of Purchase intention mean of the

negative and neutral sample is presented.

Table 7: Two sample t-test Purchase intention: Negative vs Neutral

When comparing the μ₁purchase intention in the negative frame (2,619X) with the µ₂ neutral stimuli

(2,54X) there is a difference of 0,079 although with a p-value of 0,398 therefore the null hypothesis

H₀: μ₁ - µ₂ = 0 cannot be rejected. Seeing as there was a failure to reject the null hypothesis, this

indicates that the testing was unsuccessful at providing statistical significance for the difference

between negative and neutral framing in effect on purchase intention.

38

4.4.2.2 Purchase intention: Positive framing vs Neutral stimuli

Table 8 below presents the two sample t-test comparing the positively framed advertisement with

the neutral sample.

Table 8: Two sample t-test Purchase intention: Positive vs Neutral

When comparing the μ₁ purchase intention in the positive frame (3,095X) with that of the µ₂ neutral

stimuli (2,54X) there is a difference of 0,556 at a p-value of 0,021. Since this value is lower than

the significance level 0,1 the null hypothesis H₀: μ₁ - µ₂ = 0 can be rejected in consideration for the

alternative: H₁: μ₁ - µ₂ > 0. This result demonstrates that there is a statistical significance for the

difference between positively framed advertising and the neutral sample in effect on purchase

intention.

39

4.4.2.3 Purchase intention: Negative framing vs Positive Framing

In Table 9 below the two sample t-test comparing the statistical significance of the difference

between the purchase intention means of the negative and positive sample is presented.

Table 9: Two sample t-test Purchase intention: Negative vs Positive

The purchase intention of the μ₁ negative frame is as previously mentioned (2,619X) and the

difference when compared to the µ₂ positive frame of (3,095X) is -0,476 at a p-value of 0,894 which

is above the chosen significance level of 0,1 therefore the null hypothesis H₀: μ₁ - µ₂ = 0 cannot be

rejected. The result in table 5 suggests that the test was unable to prove the statistical significance

of the difference between negative framing and positive framing in effect on purchase intention.

40

4.4.3 Manipulation checks

The following section will examine whether or not the manipulation of the advertising stimuli was

successful

4.4.3.1 Negative goal-framing paired t-test

In table 10 below, the paired t-test examining the statistical significance of the difference of the

perception of the negatively framed advert is presented

Table 10: Two sample t-test Purchase intention: Negative vs Positive

The results of the paired t-test in the negative goal framing experiment examined the participants'

perception of the advert. The mean for participants who perceived the advert as positive was 5,524

whereas the mean for the participants who perceived the advert as negative was 2,524. The p-value

was <0,001 and the difference between the means were therefore statistically significant. Overall

the negatively framed advert was predominantly perceived as positive.

41

4.4.3.2 Positive goal-framing paired t-test

In table 11 below, the paired t-test examining the statistical significance of the difference of the

perception of the positively framed advert is presented

Table 11: Two sample t-test Purchase intention: Negative vs Positive

The results of the paired t-test in the positive goal framing experiment examined the participant’s

perception of the advert. The mean for participants who perceived the advert as positive was 5,571

whereas the mean for the participants who perceived the advert as negative was 2,190. The p-value

was <0,001 and the difference between the means were therefore statistically significant. Also this

advert was perceived as positive.

From the results of the two paired-t tests conducted the conclusion that the framing manipulation

was a failure can be drawn. Seeing as the negatively framed advert was not perceived as negative

then perhaps the effect of the framing manipulation might not have been as strong as intended.

Although a point could be made that the positive goal framing manipulation appears to be more

positive than the negative goal framing. Furthermore, the negative goal framing appears to be

perceived as more negative than the positive goal-framing. However further testing is necessary to

be able to make such a conclusion.

42

5. Analysis

As previously portrayed in the frame of reference in figure 4, attitudes are antecedents to intention.

Therefore the experiment's success relies on whether or not both attitude and intention was affected

by the framing manipulation. When reviewing the data presented in the results section there were

clear indications with statistical significance, that the neutral advertisement was less effective than

the framed advertising. The testing showed significant results both for positively and negatively

framed goal framing when compared to the neutral sample. However negative goal framing only

had effect on the respondent’s attitude towards the product. The effect on purchase intention by the

negatively framed advertisement had no statistical significance compared to the neutral sample.

Furthermore the testing on the positively framed advertisement had a statistically significant effect

on both product attitude and purchase intention, these findings are deemed highly relevant. The

negative goal framing was therefore deemed less effective than the positively framed goal framing

when compared to the neutral sample. The findings are contradictory to those found by Meyerowitz

& Chaiken (1987), who claimed that laying emphasis on the negative consequences of not

performing an action has the most effect.

The results are in line with the findings of Burböck, Kubli, Maček, and Bobek (2019) who argued

that goal framing was more preferable when framed in a positive way. The findings are also in line

with Tversky & Kahneman (1981) who propose that individual preference is concise

advertisements and with a risk averse attitude when presented with positive frames based on

gaining something. Additionally when reviewing the literature on attitude toward a behavior in the

theory of planned behavior model, as presented previously in figure 3, the findings conform to that

of the model. The theory states that behavior that has desirable consequences is favored while

behavior that is associated with undesirable consequences is unfavored. (Ajzen, 1991). There is a

possibility that the behavior of using all-white snus has been perceived as more desirable than the

behavior of not using all-white snus, and therefore the positively framed advertisement had a

stronger effect than its negative counterpart.

43

When reviewing the goal framing samples manipulation checks were included in order to collect

data on whether or not the respondents perceived the sample in a positive or negative light. The

manipulation checks suggested that all the questionnaires were perceived as more positive than

negative. These findings could be interpreted as beneficial to strengthening the significance of the

effect of the positive goal framing sample. However it raises the question of the significance of the

negatively framed sample, seeing as it was perceived as predominantly positive. Perhaps the result

would have been different if the negatively framed goal framing sample was perceived as negative.

When weighing in the distribution of users and non-users as a parameter of the analysis the

descriptive data shows that the group containing the largest number of users is the positive sample.

Seeing as the positive sample also scored the highest purchase intention and attitude towards the

product perhaps the data might be a bit skewed.

44

6. Conclusions

As stated previously the aim of the study was to explore attitudes and intentions towards nicotine

products and how they were affected by the goal framing effect. In an effort to meet aims of the

thesis the following research question was stated:

“Research question: Is there a framing effect when advertising tobacco free snus?”

The research question was answered using data collected from a quasi-experiment and later tested

using hypotheses. The hypotheses used in the statistical tests tested the hypothesis stated as:

“H1 Alternative hypothesis: There is a significant difference in effect on attitudes and intention

between using positive or negative goal-framing when advertising tobacco free snus products.”

“H0 Null hypothesis :μ1 – μ2 = 0 There is no significant difference in effect on attitudes and

intention between using positive or negative goal-framing when advertising tobacco free snus

products”

The statistical testing found evidence to reject the null hypothesis in consideration for the

alternative hypothesis: “There is a significant difference in effect on attitudes and intention between

using positive or negative goal-framing when advertising tobacco free snus products”. The results

indicated that both positive and negative goal-framing had a greater effect than the control group.

Furthermore the results of the study suggest that positive goal-framing has an effect on both

purchase intention and product attitude when compared to the neutral sample. The negative goal-

framing had an effect on product attitude when compared to the neutral sample.

45

6.1 Practical implications

In essence this study has shown the presence of the framing effect, specifically the goal-framing

effect in advertising. By revealing its presence in the marketing of nicotine products it brings the

opportunity to suggest recommendations to decision makers in various fields, specifically in

advertising. One such recommendation is the fact that there is a need to be aware of the framing

effect as an advertiser. The need for awareness of the framing effect extends further than to the

situations of deliberate framing. As an advertiser one must be aware that the way in which the

attributes or consequences that are a part of the communication is portrayed, has an effect on the

way in which it is interpreted by the consumer. The framing effect can thus lead to unexpected

pitfalls if used incorrectly or inadvertently. On the other hand the implications of this study show

that the goal framing effect could prove to be a valuable tool in the marketer’s toolbox. With

regards to the advertising of tobacco free snus products, this study has shown to some extent that

it could be preferable to make use of the positive goal framing effect. According to the findings

this should affect the consumers’ purchase intention based on the attitude towards the products.

6.2 Theoretical implications

As previously mentioned various areas have been studied in regards to the framing effect and

advertising. The gap that this thesis is intended to fill is that of the framing effect on advertisements

of nicotine products. By combining the research topic with a well formulated methodology this

thesis has attempted to fill that gap. The main contribution of this thesis is the new perspective of

students' perceptions on goal-framed advertisement of tobacco free snus. This perspective portrays

the existence and effectiveness of the goal-framing effect on attitudes and purchase intentions.

The theoretical implications of this thesis are the building blocks that have been laid for future

research to better understand the framing effect when advertising nicotine products.

This study has confirmed to some extent that framing effect is a factor that is present in the

advertising of tobacco free products. In addition to that, the findings in the experimental measures

conducted in this thesis suggests that the positive goal-framing has an effect on both purchase

intention and product attitude, whereas the negative goal-framing has an effect on product attitude

46

when advertising tobacco free snus products. These findings should contribute to the knowledge

of advertising which could be of interest to both marketers and consumers.

6.3 Limitations

The first error is the fact that the total sample size of the study only reached 63 participants. The

aim of the study was to acquire 105 participants with 35 participants in each of the experiment

groups in order to achieve generalizability. Although the sample size in each experiment group

only reached 21, the testing was still successfully conducted in terms of being able to complete the

two sample t-test, however the ability to generalize the findings is greatly reduced. Under different

circumstances the available participants might have been able to be collected in person but, as

mentioned in the delimitations, physically collecting participants was impossible due to the

negative effects of COVID-19 pandemic which obstructed the efforts.

The second error is attributable to the randomization of the participants. Seeing as participants were

selected from a list of email addresses of LTU students the sample cannot be considered random.

As previously mentioned, the preferred way of portioning and selecting participants was severely

hindered by the COVID-19 pandemic which made it impossible to select participants in the

intended random order. Utmost effort has been put into randomizing the mailing list and thereby

the selection of participants but in essence the selection cannot be considered random.

The third factor that may have affected the results of this study is the way that the statistical testing

has been conducted. It is a common conception that when analyzing three independent groups, in

this case experiment 1, experiment 2 and control that the suggested statistical approach is to

conduct ANOVA tests. However the statistical test approach of this study was two sample t-tests

testing each of the groups against each other. Seeing as there were three groups in this study the

use of multiple two-sample t-tests increased the risk of rejecting the true null hypothesis compared

to ANOVA testing.

Lastly referring to the framing manipulation checks, seeing as the testing of the manipulation

checks suggested that the stimuli in the different experiments was perceived as predominantly

47

positive perhaps the results would have differed if the negative goal-framing sample was perceived

as predominantly negative.

6.4 Suggestions for further research

For future research, find a way to improve the impact of the framing effect in the experiments. Also

use a larger sample size which is randomized. In an effort to delve deeper a study could be done

on users versus non users. Also expanding the study to acquire participants from a larger

international sample in order to generalize the results to a larger population. Moreover another

interesting further research task could be to conduct the same research in other markets other than

the Swedish market. Finally a highly interesting area for further research would be to develop a

standardized measurement in order to be able to compare results between studies.

48

References

Ajzen, I. (1991) The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision

Processes, 50, 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Avanza. (2020) BAT köper stor del av ST inkl Fiedler & Lundgren snus. Retrieved 20200401

from: https://www.avanza.se/placera/telegram/2008/02/28/tobak-bat-koper-stor-del-av-st-inkl-

fiedler-lundgrens-snus.html

Baines, P., Fill, C., & Rosengren, S. (2017). Marketing (4th ed.). Great Clarendon Street, Oxford,

OX2 6DP, United Kingdom: Oxford university press.

Black, T. R. (1999). Doing quantitative research in the social sciences: An integrated approach

to research design, measurement and statistics (1st ed). 6 Bonhill Street, London, EC2A 4PU,

Great Britain: Sage Publications ltd.

British American Tobacco. (2020) Harm reduction focus report 2018. Retrieved 20200325

from:https://www.bat.com/group/sites/UK__9D9KCY.nsf/vwPagesWebLive/DO964UGU/$file

/Harm_Reduction_Focus_Report_2018.pdf

Buda, R., & Zhang, Y. (2000). Consumer product evaluation: The interactive effect of message

framing, presentation order, and source credibility. Journal of Product & Brand Management,

9(4), 229-242. doi:10.1108/10610420010344022

Burböck, B., Kubli, V., Maček, A., & Bobek, V. (2019). Effects of different types of framing in

advertising messages on human decision behaviour. International Journal of Diplomacy and

Economy, 5(1), 27-41. doi:10.1504/IJDIPE.2019.099139

Camerer, Colin F. and Loewenstein, George (2003) Behavioral Economics: Past, Present,

Future. In: Advances in behavioral economics. Roundtable series in behavioral economics.

Princeton University Press , Princeton, N.J., pp. 1-61. ISBN 9780691116815. Retrieved

20200526 from: https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20110204-152338626

Costa, D. F., Carvalho, F. d. M., & Moreira, Bruno César de Melo. (2019). Behavioral economics

and behavioral finance: A bibliometric analysis of the scientific fields. Journal of Economic

Surveys, 33(1), 3-24. doi:10.1111/joes.12262

Eliasson, A. (2010). Kvantitativ metod fran borjan (2., uppdaterade uppl. ed.). Lund:

Studentlitteratur.

Japan Tobacco Inc. (2020)a Integrated report 2019 Retrieved from:

ttps://www.jt.com/investors/results/integrated_report/pdf/2019/integrated2019_E_all.pd

JTI%20UK%20Nordic%20Spirit%20Launch%20Press%20Release%20June%202019.pdf

49

Japan Tobacco Inc. (2020)b JTI launches Nordic Spirit: a new choice for nicotine consumers

100% tobacco-free pouches can be used anytime, anywhere. Retrieved 20200325 from

https://www.jti.com/sites/default/files/local-files/gb/

Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. The

American Economic Review, 93(5), 1449-1475. doi:10.1257/000282803322655392

Kahneman, D. (2013). Tänka, snabbt och långsamt. Stora Nygatan 7. 111 27 Stockholm:

Volante.

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. The

Econometric Society, 47(2) Retrieved 20200401 from https://www.jstor.org/stable/1914185

Kees, J. (2011). Advertising framing effects and consideration of future consequences. The

Journal of Consumer Affairs, 45(1), 7-32. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6606.2010.01190.x

Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). A framework for marketing management (Sixth ed., global ed.

ed.). Edinburgh Gate, Harlow, Essex Cm20 2JE, England:

Lee, A. Y., & Aaker, J. L. (2004). Bringing the frame into focus. Journal of Personality and

Social Psychology, 86(2), 205-218. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.205

Meyerowitz, B. E., & Chaiken, S. (1987). The effect of message framing on breast self-

examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,

52(3), 500-510. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.500

PMI. (2020). Our smoke-free products. Retrieved 20200526 from: https://www.pmi.com/smoke-

free-products

Putrevu, S. (2010). An examination of consumer responses toward attribute- and goal-framed

messages. Journal of Advertising, 39(3), 5-24. doi:10.2753/JOA0091-3367390301

Scott B. MacKenzie, Richard J. Lutz, & George E. Belch. (1986). The role of attitude toward the

ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: A test of competing explanations. Journal of

Marketing Research, 23(2), 130-143. doi:10.1177/002224378602300205

Stutely, R. (2003). Numbers guide (5. ed. ed.). New York: Bloomberg Press. Retrieved 20200520

from https://bordeure.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/the-economist-numbers-guide-the-

essentials-of-business-numeracy.pdf

Swedish Match. (2020) Market for Smokefree. Retrieved 20200407 from:

https://www.swedishmatch.com/Our-business/Snus-and-moist-snuff/Market-development/

Thaler, R., & Sunstein, C. (2009). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and

50

happiness. 357 Hudson Street, New York, New york 10014, U.S.A.: Penguin Books.

Toll, B., Salovey, P., O'Malley, S., Mazure, C., Latimer, A., & McKee, S. (2008). Message

framing for smoking cessation: The interaction of risk perceptions and gender. Nicotine &

Tobacco Research, 10(1), 195-200. doi:10.1080/14622200701767803

Tu, J., Kao, T., & Tu, Y. (2013). Influences of framing effect and green message on advertising

effect. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 41(7), 1083-1098.

doi:10.2224/sbp.2013.41.7.1083

Wilkinson, N., & Klaes, M. (2012). An introduction to behavioral economics. 175 Fifth Avenue,

New York, Ny 10010: Palgrave Macmillan.

51

7.Appendix

7.1 Appendix 1 - Questionnaire

52

53