the future of technology in peacebuilding: presentation at mit media lab

43
ICT4Peace future conflict and its transformation Sanjana Hattotuwa TED Fellow Special Advisor, ICT4Peace Foundation

Upload: sanjana-hattotuwa

Post on 07-May-2015

2.030 views

Category:

Internet


0 download

DESCRIPTION

In early April this year, I was invited to deliver a keynote address at the inaugural Build Peace conference, held at MIT Media Lab. My presentation was given, almost to the day, twenty years after the Rwandan genocide. Just before I went on stage, we all observed a minute's silence to remember the victims. The genocide wasn't on my mind when I made the slides for the presentation, but brought into sharp focus the thrust of my submission, which was to look ten to fifteen years into the future, and how information and communications technologies (ICTs) would feature in both the genesis and inflammation of complex political emergencies (CPEs) - in other words, violent conflict - as well as aid in peacebuilding and conflict transformation.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The future of technology in peacebuilding: Presentation at MIT Media Lab

ICT4Peace future conflict and its transformation

Sanjana Hattotuwa !TED Fellow Special Advisor, ICT4Peace Foundation

Page 2: The future of technology in peacebuilding: Presentation at MIT Media Lab

my past accidental activist

Page 3: The future of technology in peacebuilding: Presentation at MIT Media Lab

see differently interrogating trauma through technology

Page 4: The future of technology in peacebuilding: Presentation at MIT Media Lab

the future never comes as we expect it

Page 5: The future of technology in peacebuilding: Presentation at MIT Media Lab

the present is what we choose to see

Page 6: The future of technology in peacebuilding: Presentation at MIT Media Lab

concepts frameworks for peaceful change

Page 7: The future of technology in peacebuilding: Presentation at MIT Media Lab

radical inclusion hearing everybody’s voice

Page 8: The future of technology in peacebuilding: Presentation at MIT Media Lab

Nimalaruban’s mother | Murder with impunityhttp://groundviews.org/2012/07/31/ganesan-nimalaruban-a-damning-murder-funeral-and-silence/

Page 9: The future of technology in peacebuilding: Presentation at MIT Media Lab

The disappeared | Abducted, erased and voiceless5,676+, second only to Iraq

Page 10: The future of technology in peacebuilding: Presentation at MIT Media Lab

IDPs | Without land or shelterThose who survive but aren’t counted, http://www.ceylontoday.lk/59-13681-news-detail-relocated-to-nowhere.html

Page 11: The future of technology in peacebuilding: Presentation at MIT Media Lab

inclusion of everyone, selection around a process,

managing exclusion

Page 12: The future of technology in peacebuilding: Presentation at MIT Media Lab

algorithms The math of discrimination?

Page 13: The future of technology in peacebuilding: Presentation at MIT Media Lab

bespoke web what’s beyond & behind the tailoring?

Page 14: The future of technology in peacebuilding: Presentation at MIT Media Lab

Selection bias as the new objective how to critically question?

Page 15: The future of technology in peacebuilding: Presentation at MIT Media Lab

power and discrimination written into algorithms,

rendered invisible, become the new norm

Page 16: The future of technology in peacebuilding: Presentation at MIT Media Lab

corporate bias conflated with corporate benevolence

Page 17: The future of technology in peacebuilding: Presentation at MIT Media Lab

implications of convenience over privacy

Page 18: The future of technology in peacebuilding: Presentation at MIT Media Lab

internet of things when your fridge knows more than mom

Page 19: The future of technology in peacebuilding: Presentation at MIT Media Lab

watch dogs: CTOS as the future of urban life? http://us.playstation.com/ps4/games/watch-dogs-ps4.html

Page 20: The future of technology in peacebuilding: Presentation at MIT Media Lab

when does intelligence turn into surveillance? how to maintain control over privacy within ecosystem of competing owners, location sensors, proxy indicators, sentient nodes, ambient observation, pervasive automation

Page 21: The future of technology in peacebuilding: Presentation at MIT Media Lab

who controls “smart” & “intelligent” things?

• a new violence around graded eco-systems of services, with luxury being defined by access, in turn based on the digitisation of discrimination

• IP conflict & governance - complexity requires giving up direct oversight & control. Have we imagined conflict resolution mechanisms for the Internet of Things?

• cascading conflict from ubiquitous inter-connections

Page 22: The future of technology in peacebuilding: Presentation at MIT Media Lab

privatisation of information paying more basic rights

Page 23: The future of technology in peacebuilding: Presentation at MIT Media Lab

expedient profit over principles https://no-spyware-for-dictators.eu

Page 24: The future of technology in peacebuilding: Presentation at MIT Media Lab

corporations know more than governments

Page 25: The future of technology in peacebuilding: Presentation at MIT Media Lab

shareholders as primus inter pares

Page 26: The future of technology in peacebuilding: Presentation at MIT Media Lab

the negotiation of exclusion outside of franchise &

democracy

Page 27: The future of technology in peacebuilding: Presentation at MIT Media Lab

tech innovation & conflict towards endogenous answers

Page 28: The future of technology in peacebuilding: Presentation at MIT Media Lab

Those who can innovate in the Global South, want to be the next Zuckerberg.Those who can innovate in the Global North, write themselves in as enduring saviours.

Page 29: The future of technology in peacebuilding: Presentation at MIT Media Lab

JFK with first cohort of Peace Corps, Aug. 1962. South to South Peace Tech Corps, 2015?

Page 30: The future of technology in peacebuilding: Presentation at MIT Media Lab

Incubators around ICTs for peaceFrom surrogate projects to more organic development

Page 31: The future of technology in peacebuilding: Presentation at MIT Media Lab

future peace processes challenges & opportunities

Page 32: The future of technology in peacebuilding: Presentation at MIT Media Lab

How will radical transparency & pervasive technology impact closed door, high-level negotiations? What is the future of Chatham House Rule?

Page 33: The future of technology in peacebuilding: Presentation at MIT Media Lab

Vint Cerf flags how a DDoS attack can be mounted by fridges against the Bank of America in the future. Impact on a peace process with similar attack?

Page 34: The future of technology in peacebuilding: Presentation at MIT Media Lab

How can the Internet of Things (smart TVs and fridges) be used creatively in a peace process? Can we reach out to the ‘Other’ interactively using family recipes and bad reality shows?

Page 35: The future of technology in peacebuilding: Presentation at MIT Media Lab

How will millions of lifestreams, freely accessibly on the web, impact in real time negotiations around identity & resources? How will lifestreams from negotiations impact fragile societies?

Page 36: The future of technology in peacebuilding: Presentation at MIT Media Lab

big data on the granular digital smoke signals on key issues

Page 37: The future of technology in peacebuilding: Presentation at MIT Media Lab

big data for context beyond the event driven, underlying drivers of peace & violent conflict

Page 38: The future of technology in peacebuilding: Presentation at MIT Media Lab

justice & reconciliation what will it mean for for digital natives?

Page 39: The future of technology in peacebuilding: Presentation at MIT Media Lab

ict4peace for whom? focus & intent matters

Page 40: The future of technology in peacebuilding: Presentation at MIT Media Lab

dignity

Page 41: The future of technology in peacebuilding: Presentation at MIT Media Lab

ethics

Page 42: The future of technology in peacebuilding: Presentation at MIT Media Lab

our reach should exceed our grasp - or what’s peace

building for? !

with apologies to Robert Browning