the future of pension management: what can switzerland ...€¦ · than to succeed...
TRANSCRIPT
INTERNAL USE ONLY
The Future of Pension Management:What Can Switzerland Learn From It?
Keith Ambachtsheer
Director Emeritus, International Centre for Pension Management
Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto
President, KPA Advisory Services
Thursday, June 15, 2017
© Z
uri
ch
In
su
ran
ce
Com
pa
ny L
td
INTERNAL USE ONLY 2
© Z
uri
ch
In
su
ran
ce
Com
pa
ny L
td
INTERNAL USE ONLY
My Book’s Three Key Messages
3
We know how to design sustainable 21st Century workplace pension plans.
We know how to build effective 21st Century pension organizations.
We know how to transform retirement savings into wealth-producing capital.
1
2
3
© Z
uri
ch
In
su
ran
ce
Com
pa
ny L
td
INTERNAL USE ONLY
Pillar 1: Universal, Pay-Go/Tax-Funded
• Sustainability
Pillar 2: Employment-Based, Pre-Funded
• Coverage, adequacy, affordability
• Fair, effective risk-pooling
• Choice architecture
• Innovation
Pillar 3: Individual-Based, Tax-Deferred
• Behavioral Economics
• Asymmetric information
• Low value, high cost?
Pension Design Challenges
4
© Z
uri
ch
In
su
ran
ce
Com
pa
ny L
td
INTERNAL USE ONLY
The Tinbergen DA/TB Pension Model
5
Two Goals => Two Instruments
Affordability
Instrument
Safety
Instrument
Long-Horizon
Wealth-Creation
Investment
Program
Shorter-Horizon
Payments-for-Life
ALM
Program
© Z
uri
ch
In
su
ran
ce
Com
pa
ny L
td
INTERNAL USE ONLY
Swiss Pillar 2 Design
6
High level of complexity
Strong emphasis on solvency and guarantees
How to simplify pension designs?
How to place greater emphasis on wealth creation rather than safety?
© Z
uri
ch
In
su
ran
ce
Com
pa
ny L
td
INTERNAL USE ONLY
Drucker’s Three Organization Effectiveness Drivers
7
Clear purpose/ mission
Good governance
No resource constraints
1
2
3
© Z
uri
ch
In
su
ran
ce
Com
pa
ny L
td
INTERNAL USE ONLY
Research Findings
• Faulty board selection processes
• Micro management by boards
• Ineffective organization design/incentive structures
Remedies
• Upgrade board selection processes
• Upgrade board self-evaluation processes
• Upgrade board education processes
Pension Governance Challenges
8
© Z
uri
ch
In
su
ran
ce
Com
pa
ny L
td
INTERNAL USE ONLY
Observations from O’Barr, Conley and Keynes
9
“The primary focus of pension organizations appears to be responsibility deflection and blame management….”.
O’Barr and Conley (1992)
Worldly wisdom teaches that it is better for reputation to fail conventionally than to succeed unconventionally….”.
Keynes (1936)
© Z
uri
ch
In
su
ran
ce
Com
pa
ny L
td
INTERNAL USE ONLY
Five Additional Comments
• “The selection process for board members in our organization is seriously flawed….”
• “Our board can’t stay out of the weeds….getting involved with administrative and operational details….”
• “We have a wonderfully dedicated board….but they fly just above the tree tops rather than at a strategic fiduciary altitude….”
• “Our board does not use its time effectively….”
• “Our board has no appetite for dealing with our serious compensation issues….”
Governance Survey Findings
10
© Z
uri
ch
In
su
ran
ce
Com
pa
ny L
td
INTERNAL USE ONLY
Do these governance research findings
describe the current Swiss situation?
Governance of Swiss Pension Organizations
11
© Z
uri
ch
In
su
ran
ce
Com
pa
ny L
td
INTERNAL USE ONLY
Research Findings
• Investment beliefs/implementation gap
• Investment performance measurement/management gap
• Investment risk measurement/management gap
Remedies
• Align investment beliefs with implementation strategies
• Redefine ‘investment performance’ and how it should be measured
• Redefine ‘investment risk’ and how it should be measured
Pension Investing Challenges
12
© Z
uri
ch
In
su
ran
ce
Com
pa
ny L
td
INTERNAL USE ONLY
10-Year Net Excess Return Over The Liability Portfolio
13
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
Ass
et
min
us
liab
ility
ret
urn
(p
erc
en
t)
Asset-liability mismatch risk (percent)
Canadian
Dutch
United States
Source: CEM Benchmarking Inc.
© Z
uri
ch
In
su
ran
ce
Com
pa
ny L
td
INTERNAL USE ONLY
10-Year Net Excess Return Over The Asset Mix Policy Portfolio
14
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Net
val
ue
ad
de
d (
pe
rce
nt)
Volatility of net value added (percent)
Net Value Added vs. Standard Deviation of Value Added
Canadian
Dutch
United States
Source: CEM Benchmarking Inc.
© Z
uri
ch
In
su
ran
ce
Com
pa
ny L
td
INTERNAL USE ONLY
‘Value for Money’ Investment Services?
15
Source: CEM Benchmarking Inc.
10-Year Net Value-Added versus Total Investment Costs - 2006-2015
© Z
uri
ch
In
su
ran
ce
Com
pa
ny L
td
INTERNAL USE ONLY
Keynes in 1936: Speculation or Investing?
16
Speculation vs. Investing
Zero-sum trading
games less costs
lead to
LT market
underperformance
Creating and nurturing
sustainable long-term
cash-flows
lead to
LT market outperformance
© Z
uri
ch
In
su
ran
ce
Com
pa
ny L
td
INTERNAL USE ONLY
Real World Keynesian Investors
17
Keynes, Buffett, Swensen, MFS, OTPP, CPPIB, Generation IM, Ownership Capital.....
Common characteristics: material LT market
outperformance with…..
Behavior that will seem eccentric, unconventional,
and rash in the eyes of average opinion.JMK, 1936
© Z
uri
ch
In
su
ran
ce
Com
pa
ny L
td
INTERNAL USE ONLY
My Book’s Three Key Messages
18
We know how to design sustainable 21st Century workplace pension plans.
We know how to build effective 21st Century pension organizations.
We know how to transform retirement savings into wealth-producing capital.
1
2
3
© Z
uri
ch
In
su
ran
ce
Com
pa
ny L
td
INTERNAL USE ONLY
Three Questions for Switzerland
19
Can you simplify your Pillar 2 designs and place greater emphasis on return-seeking?
Are you satisfied with the governance quality at Swiss pension organizations?
How can you create more scale and insourcing in your investment functions?
1
2
3