the five regulatory environmentsctdru.research.southwales.ac.uk/media/files/... · di sarsina pr....
TRANSCRIPT
Asian Medicine Bridging the Validation Gap…?
Mark J. Langweiler, DC, DAAPM
Welsh Institute of Chiropractic
University of South Wales
Treforest
The Problems
Is it possible to integrate traditional Asian medical practices with modern Western
medical systems without loss of authenticity?
Are traditional ‘best practices’ possible?
Given the wide array of traditional Asian medical systems, is it possible (or desirable)
to develop a regulatory framework?
Are traditional medicine ‘professionals’ a real option?
Globalization Is validation a real option?
Can cultures merge?
Rise of Professionals A 'professional' group has the legitimate authority
(usually delegated from government) to set its own standards for entrance, to admit new
members, to establish a code of conduct, to discipline members and it claims to have a body
of knowledge (achieved through education) which legitimizes its autonomy and
distinctiveness.
The regulation of the production of producers and the regulation of the production by
producer.
How are professions created? Practitioners who through their professional association
seek to identify, carve-out and protect an area of exclusive competence so to maximize financial and status rewards.
Users of professional services who, through their demands
and expectations, determine the way the professions practice and organize themselves.
States who either grant autonomy and self-regulation to
professionals and their associations (Anglo-American context) or actively license them and regulate them as a ‘quasi’ civil service (Continental European context).
Universities which produce the knowledge-base of the
professions and provide the credentials (an approved degree) that support professional closure regimes.
Striving for Professionalism The Glenarthur Criteria
1. Profession is mature
2. A single governing body
3. Based on a systematic body of knowledge
4. Recognised courses of training
5. Demonstrate efficacy
6. Legislative proposals based on independent criteria which safeguard the public*
*Added later by Lord Skelmersdale
The Glenarthur Criteria and Chiropractic:
The UK Example
Chiropractic- Brief History
Developed in US Midwest by Daniel David Palmer 1895.
Medicine in Chaos--response to treatment often
being worse than care!
Early theories based on magnetic healing and vitalism
Entered UK 1908.
Educational standards minimal
Until opening of Anglo-European
Chiropractic College, 1965
Limited research and funding
Chiropractic Act, 1994
As professions mature
Epistemological autonomy
Code of practice
Professional qualifications
Control over own affairs
Self-regulating
Single Governing Body
Regulatory Body- General Chiropractic Council
Professional Bodies British Chiropractic Association(BCA)
United Chiropractic Association(UCA)
Scottish Chiropractic Society(SCA)
Systemic Body of Knowledge
Issues in dispute.
BCA (largest organization) is building on the biomedical model
UCA relies on original philosophy of D.D. Palmer-
vitalism, innate nature of healing
SCA is a catch all organization for a geographic area.
Recognized Courses of Training
Within the United Kingdom there are three schools for the training of doctors of chiropractic.
Anglo-European Chiropractic College(independent)
Welsh Institute of Chiropractic)division of the University of South Wales)
McTimoney College of Chiropractic(independent)
Current Chiropractic Education Curriculum
Year Courses
1 Clinical Anatomy, Physiology, Behaviour Science, Chiropractic Technique, Biomechanics, Normal Radiology, Embryology
2 Neuroanatomy, Neurophysiology, Pathology, Histology, Chiropractic Technique, Clinical Imaging, Clinical Nutrition, Mental Health
3 General Diagnosis, Clinical Imaging II, Chiropractic Technique, Neuro-orthopedics, Functional Management
4 Evidenced Based Diagnosis and Clinical Subspecialties, Research, Clinical Practice
Demonstrate Efficacy Research
Meta-Analysis Systematic Review Evidence Table
Evidence Summary
Practice Guideline Recommendation
Review Criteria Clinical Audit
Protocol
Standard
Legislative Regulatory Environments
Legislative Regulations 1. Illegal practice
2. Common law
3. Regulation without protection of title
4. Regulation with protection of title
5. Regulation with protection of title and function
Legislative
USA- Only registered health professional have any business ministering to the public (5)
Canada-Provincial and Federal responsible with differing requirements from province to province
Australia-Bridged the gap between food and medicine with the ‘therapeutic goods legislation.
UK Legislation Chiropractic Act, 1994
What does this mean?
Recognition?
Incorporation into NHS?
Prestige?
Altered public perception?
Increasing medicalization?
Loss of a tradition or advancement of a profession?
Barriers to inclusion?
Mistrust of lack of evidence
Levels of training
Lack of knowledge about conditions treated
Not paid for by NHS or health insurance
Differing philosophical foundations
Cultural differences
No clear outcomes
Economic considerations uncertain
Organisational constraints
Colleagues resistance
Misguided policies
What to do
Open dialogue with all parties involved
Develop educational standards
Speak with one voice
Research that emphasizes efficacy and outcomes
Build trust and public confidence
Thank you
References Adams J. Editorial: Examining sites of interface between CAM and conventional health care: extending
the sociological gaze. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 2004; 12:69-70.
Bodekerr G. Lessons on integration from the developing world’s experience. Regulation of complementary/alternative medicine: a Canadian perspective. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 2002;10:14-19.
Breen A. Evidenced-based practice: friend or foe. British Journal of Chiropractic, 2002; 1(1):2-3.
Burrage, M. and Torstendahl, R. (eds.), 2004 Professions in Theory and History: Rethinking the Study of the Professions. London: Sage.
Butler K, Cunliffe C, Hunnisett A. Barriers between General Practitioners and Chiropractors. Chiropractic Evidence, 2012: 6.
Cardini F, Wade C, Regalia AL et al. Clinical research in traditional medicine: Priorities and methods. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 2006; 14: 282-287.
Carlton AL, Bensoussan A. Regulation of complementary medicine practitioners in Australia: Chinese medicine as a case example. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 2002; 10:20-26.
Chen RQ, Wong CM Cao KJ, Lam TH. An evidence-based validation of traditional Chinese medicine syndromes. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 2010; 18:199-205.
Chua SA, Furnham A. Attitudes and beliefs towards complementary and alternative medicine (CAM): A cross-cultural approach comparing Singapore and the United Kingdom. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 2008; 16:247-253.
Chung VCH, Ma PXX, Lau CH, Griffiths SM. Developing Policy for Integration Biomedicine and Traditional Chinese Medical Practice Using Focus Groups and the Delphi Technique. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2012; doi:10.1155/2012/149512. Downloaded August 15, 2013.
Cohen MH. CAM regulation in the United States. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 2002; 10:3-7.
Conboy L, Kaptchuk TJ, Eisenberg DM, et al. The relationship between social factors and attitudes toward conventional and CAM practitioners. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 2007;13:146-157.
References Copland-Griffiths M. Statutory Regulation: The Chiropractic Experience. British Journal of Chiropractic, 1999;
3(3): 68-73.
Department of Health. The regulation of the non-medical healthcare professions. July 2006. Downloaded August 20, 2013.
Di Sarsina PR. The Social Demand for a Medicine Focused on the Person: The Contribution of CAM to Healthcare and Healthgenesis. eCAM, 2007; 4 (S1): 45-51.
Evetts, J. Short Note: The Sociology of Professional Groups. New Directions. Current Sociology, 2006; 54(1):133-143.
Fennell D, Liberato, ASQ, Zsembik B. Definitions and patterns of CAM use by the lay public. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 2009; 17:71-77.007; 10: 59-60.
Finch R. Trust, assurance and safety: The regulation of health professional in the 21st century- Revalidation for all. Clinical Chiropractic, 2007; 10: 59-60.
Kelner M, Wellman B, Boon H, Welsh S. The role of the state in the social inclusion of complementary and alternative medical occupations. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 2004; 12: 79-89.
Lam TP, Sun KS. Dilemma of integration with Western medicine-Views of Traditional Chinese Medicine practitioners in a predominant Western medical setting. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 2013;21:300-305.
Lewith GT, Jonas WB, Walach H. Clinical Research in Complementary Therapies: Principles, Problems and Solutions, 2nd ed. 2011. Churchill Livingstone, London.
Mills SY. Regulation in complementary and alternative medicine. BMJ, 2001; 322158-160.
Mills S. CAM Regulation, Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 2002;10:2.
Mills SY. The House of Lords report on complementary medicine: a summary. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 2001;9:34-39.
Noble D. Commentary: Could there be a Synthesis between Western and Oriental Medicine, and with Sasang Constitutional Medicine in Particular?. eCAM, 2009;6(S1) 5-10.
Owen DK, Lewith G, Stephens, CR. Can Doctors respond to patients’ increasing interest in complementary and alternative medicine? BMJ, 2001;322:154-158.
Park CM. Diversity, the individual, and proof of Efficacy: Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Medical Education. American Journal of Public Health, 202; 92(10): 1568-1572.
Rees L, Weil A. Editorial: Integrated medicine. BMJ 2001;322:119-120.
References Scheid V. Editorial: Authenticity, best practice, and the evidence mosaic. The challenge of
integrating traditional East Asian medicines into Western Health Care. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 2008;16: 107-108.
Scheid V, MacPherson H. 2012. Integrating East Asian Medicine into Contemporary Healthcare. Churchill Livingstone, London.
Schepers RMJ, Hermans HEGM. The medical profession and alternative medicine in the Netherlands: its history and recent development. Social Science and Medicine, 1999; 49:343-351.
Shirwaiker A, Govindarajan R, Rawat AKS. Integrating Complementary and Alternative Medicine with Primary Health care. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2013; doi.org/10.1155/2013/948308. Downloaded August 15, 2013.
Templeman K, Robinson A. Integrative medicine models in contemporary primary health care. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 2011; 19:84-92.
Thomas KJ, Nicholl JP, Coleman P. Use and expenditure on complementary medicine in England: a population based survey. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 2001;9:2-11.
Wahner-Roedler DL, Vincent A, Elkin PL, et al. Physicians’ Attitudes Toward Complementary and Alternative Medicine and Their Knowledge of Specific Therapies: A survey at an Academic Medical Center. eCAM 2006; 3 (4): 495-501.
Walker LA, Budd S. UK: the current state of regulation of complementary and alternative medicine. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 2002: 10: 8-13.
Wilson FJH. PhD Thesis: The Origins and Professional Development of Chiropractic in Britain University of Southampton, 2012.
Wong LY, Toh MPHS, Kong KE. Barriers to patient referral for Complementary and Alternative Medicines and its implications on interventions. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 2010; 18: 135-142.
World Health Organization. Traditional Medicine, 62nd World Health Assembly, Beijing, May, 2009.