the first of many fun lessons…. we will utilize class time and discussions to determine if a...

68
2.6: Proving Angles Congruent The first of many fun lessons…

Upload: anne-sanders

Post on 17-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

2.6: Proving Angles Congruent

The first of many fun lessons…

For many a lesson moving forward…

We will utilize class time and discussions to determine if a statement is true.

For many a lesson moving forward…

We will utilize class time and discussions to determine if a statement is true.

From there, we will use the drawn conclusions to problem solve.

For many a lesson moving forward…

One property we’ll use today is called the

TransitiveProperty

One property we’ll use today is called the

The transitive property states:

The transitive property states:

If a = b and b = c, then…

The transitive property states:

If a = b and b = c, then…a = c

The transitive property states:

If a = b and b = c, then…a = c

If 2 things are equal to the same thing, they are equal to each other.

Example:

1 hour = 60 minutes

Example:

1 hour = 60 minutes60 minutes = 3600 seconds

Example:

1 hour = 60 minutes60 minutes = 3600 seconds 1 hour = 3600 seconds.

Example:

We will first use it for the Vertical Angles Theorem

We will first use it for the Vertical Angles TheoremI’m confused: What is a theorem?

We will first use it for the Vertical Angles TheoremI’m confused: What is a theorem?

Relax, a theorem is a conjecture or statement that you prove true

We will first use it for the Vertical Angles TheoremTheorem 2.1

We will first use it for the Vertical Angles TheoremTheorem 2.1

◦Vertical angles are congruent.

And this is where we justify

Theorem 2.1◦Vertical angles are congruent.

And this is where we justify

Theorem 2.1◦Vertical angles are congruent.

12 3

4

Sketch

12 3

4

m1 + m 2 =

Sketch

12 3

4

m1 + m 2 = 180

Sketch Linear Pair Property

12 3

4

m1 + m 2 = 180

For that same reason

Sketch Linear Pair Property

12 3

4

m1 + m 2 = 180

For that same reason

Sketch Linear Pair Property

12 3

4

m1 + m 2 = 180m1 + m 3 = 180

Which pair listed is a vertical angle pair?

Sketch Linear Pair Property

12 3

4

m1 + m 2 = 180m1 + m 3 = 180

Which pair listed is a vertical angle pair?

Sketch Linear Pair Property

12 3

4

m1 + m 2 = 180m1 + m 3 = 180

We solve for these variables, since we’re trying to create a relationship

Sketch Linear Pair Property

12 3

4

m1 + m 2 = 180m1 + m 3 = 180

We solve for these variables, since we’re trying to create a relationship

Sketch Linear Pair Property

12 3

4

m1 + m 2 = 180m1 + m 3 = 180

m 2 = 180 – m1

We solve for these variables, since we’re trying to create a relationship

Sketch Linear Pair Property

12 3

4

m1 + m 2 = 180m1 + m 3 = 180

m 2 = 180 – m1 m 3 = 180 – m1

Are angles 2 and 3 equal to the same thing?

Sketch Linear Pair Property

12 3

4

m1 + m 2 = 180m1 + m 3 = 180

m 2 = 180 – m1 m 3 = 180 – m1

Are angles 2 and 3 equal to the same thing?

Sketch Transitive Property

12 3

4

m1 + m 2 = 180m1 + m 3 = 180

m 2 = 180 – m1 m 3 = 180 – m1

2 3

Note the difference between justifying a theorem and providing a counterexample.

Justifying a theorem often involves algebra because it must be true for all cases.

Note the difference between justifying a theorem and providing a counterexample.

Justifying a theorem often involves algebra because it must be true for all cases.

With counterexamples, we only have to prove it doesn’t work for one case.

Note the difference between justifying a theorem and providing a counterexample.

Problem Solving…

m + 92

3m - 14

m + 923m - 14

How does the approach differ?

m + 92

3m - 14

m + 923m - 14

In this diagram the angles are indeed vertical angles.

How does the approach differ?

m + 92

3m - 14

In this diagram the angles are indeed vertical angles. Therefore, we solve for x by setting them equal to each other.

How does the approach differ?

m + 92

3m - 14

3m – 14 = m + 922m = 106 m = 53

3(53) – 14 = 14553 + 92 = 145

In this diagram the angles are indeed vertical angles. Therefore, we solve for x by setting them equal to each other.

How does the approach differ?

m + 92

3m - 14

This one returns us to linear pairs

m + 923m - 14

(3m – 14) + (m + 92) = 180

This one returns us to linear pairs

m + 923m - 14

(3m – 14) + (m + 92) = 1804m + 78 = 1804m = 102m = 25.5

3(25.5) – 14 = 62.5(25.5) + 92 = 117.5

This one returns us to linear pairs

m + 923m - 14

Other conjectures…

2.2 Congruent Supplements Conjecture

Other conjectures…

2.2 Congruent Supplements Conjecture

If 2 angles are supplements of the same angle (or of congruent angles), then the 2 angles are congruent.

Other conjectures…

Proof (Long Version)

Let A, B, and C be 3 angles such that A is supplementary to B and C is supplementary to B.

Proof (Long Version)

Let A, B, and C be 3 angles such that A is supplementary to B and C is supplementary to B. From previous definitions:

Proof (Long Version)

Let A, B, and C be 3 angles such that A is supplementary to B and C is supplementary to B. From previous definitions:◦mA + m B = 180

Proof (Long Version)

Let A, B, and C be 3 angles such that A is supplementary to B and C is supplementary to B. From previous definitions:◦mA + m B = 180◦mC + m B = 180

Proof (Long Version)

Let A, B, and C be 3 angles such that A is supplementary to B and C is supplementary to B. From previous definitions:◦mA + m B = 180◦mC + m B = 180

◦Solving for A and C:

Proof (Long Version)

Let A, B, and C be 3 angles such that A is supplementary to B and C is supplementary to B. From previous definitions:◦mA = 180 – mB◦mC = 180 – mB

◦Solving for A and C:

Proof (Long Version)

Once again, we have two objects that are equal to the same thing, but we formalize it by saying◦mA = 180 – mB◦mC = 180 – mB

◦Solving for A and C:

Proof (Long Version)

Once again, we have two objects that are equal to the same thing, but we formalize it by saying◦Since the mA is now the same expression as the mC, we can say A C

◦Solving for A and C:

Proof (Long Version)

Other conjectures:

Theorem 2.3: Congruent Complements Theorem

If 2 angles are complements of the same angle (or of congruent angles), then the two angles are congruent

Theorem 2.3: Congruent Complements Theorem

If 2 angles are complements of the same angle (or of congruent angles), then the two angles are congruent

Proof is almost identical to the previous one, replacing 180 with 90.

Theorem 2.3: Congruent Complements Theorem

Theorems 2.4 and 2.5

2.4

All right angles are congruent

Theorems 2.4 and 2.5

2.4

All right angles are congruent

2.5

If 2 angles are congruent and supplementary, then each is a right angle.

Theorems 2.4 and 2.5

2.4

All right angles are congruent

2.5

If 2 angles are congruent and supplementary, then each is a right angle.

Theorems 2.4 and 2.5

With your fellow classmates, justify each of these statements with a proof, either in paragraph form or listing the steps.

All right angles are congruent

Let A and B be right angles. The m A = 90 and the m B = 90. If 2 angles have the same measure, they’re congruent. Therefore, all right angles are congruent.

All right angles are congruent

IF 2 angles are congruent and supplementary, then they are both right angles.

Let A and B be right angles. The m A = 90 and the m B = 90. If 2 angles have the same measure, they’re congruent. Therefore, all right angles are congruent.

Let A B. Then they have the same measure x. If they’re also supplementary, then they’re sum is 180. Setting up an equation:

All right angles are congruent

IF 2 angles are congruent and supplementary, then they are both right angles.

Let A and B be right angles. The m A = 90 and the m B = 90. If 2 angles have the same measure, they’re congruent. Therefore, all right angles are congruent.

mA + mB = 180x + x = 1802x = 180x = 90

which is a right angle measure.

Pages 124 – 125 6 – 12, 14, 18, 19

Homework: