the entrekin law firm evenbaum … pt to resp.pdfmicrosoft word - pts supp to opposition to mo for...

30
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 B. Lance Entrekin (#16172) THE ENTREKIN LAW FIRM One East Camelback Road, #710 Phoenix, Arizona 85012 (602) 954-1123 Email: [email protected] Geoffrey Trachtenberg (#19338) LEVENBAUM TRACHTENBERG, PLC 362 North Third Avenue Phoenix, Arizona 85003 (602) 271-0183 Email: [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiffs SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA MARICOPA COUNTY AMBER WINTERS, et al., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, vs. BANNER HEALTH NETWORK, et al., Defendants. Case No. CV2012-007665 SUPPLEMENT TO PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL (The Honorable J. Richard Gama) Plaintiffs respectfully submit a copy of Scottsdale Healthcare Hospitals v. Gammage & Burnham, Case No. CV2014-011668, Maricopa County Superior Court, attached hereto as Exhibit 1, as a supplement to Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendants’ Motion for a New Trial, filed on December 23, 2014, and presently pending before the Court. Michael K Jeanes, Clerk of Court *** Electronically Filed *** S. Bagnall, Deputy 2/20/2015 3:26:00 PM Filing ID 6418575

Upload: lamnhu

Post on 15-May-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: THE ENTREKIN LAW FIRM EVENBAUM … Pt to resp.pdfMicrosoft Word - PTS Supp to Opposition to MO for New Trial.docx Author lisa Created Date 2/20/2015 3:17:09 PM

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

B. Lance Entrekin (#16172)THE ENTREKIN LAW FIRM One East Camelback Road, #710 Phoenix, Arizona 85012 (602) 954-1123 Email: [email protected] Geoffrey Trachtenberg (#19338) LEVENBAUM TRACHTENBERG, PLC 362 North Third Avenue Phoenix, Arizona 85003 (602) 271-0183 Email: [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiffs

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA

MARICOPA COUNTY

AMBER WINTERS, et al., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

BANNER HEALTH NETWORK, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. CV2012-007665

SUPPLEMENT TO PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL (The Honorable J. Richard Gama)

Plaintiffs respectfully submit a copy of Scottsdale Healthcare Hospitals v.

Gammage & Burnham, Case No. CV2014-011668, Maricopa County Superior Court,

attached hereto as Exhibit 1, as a supplement to Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendants’ Motion

for a New Trial, filed on December 23, 2014, and presently pending before the Court.

Michael K Jeanes, Clerk of Court*** Electronically Filed ***

S. Bagnall, Deputy2/20/2015 3:26:00 PM

Filing ID 6418575

Page 2: THE ENTREKIN LAW FIRM EVENBAUM … Pt to resp.pdfMicrosoft Word - PTS Supp to Opposition to MO for New Trial.docx Author lisa Created Date 2/20/2015 3:17:09 PM

 

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

As the Court will note in Paragraph 15 of the above-referenced Complaint,

Scottsdale Healthcare Hospitals, which was formerly known as Scottsdale Healthcare

Corporation, a Defendant in the present case, has admitted in a pleading that its attorneys

engaged in “Lien Work [which] entailed the pursuit of collection of unpaid healthcare bills

through the recordation and release of liens against delinquent patients . . . .” This is yet

another admission by a Defendant hospital that liens are collections against patients and

not, as Defendants claim, against third parties.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 20th day of February, 2015. LEVENBAUM TRACHTENBERG, PLC /s/ Geoffrey M. Trachtenberg Geoffrey Trachtenberg (#19338) THE ENTREKIN LAW FIRM /s/ B. Lance Entrekin B. Lance Entrekin (#16172)

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

ORIGINAL of the forgoing e-filed via TurboCourt And COPIES mailed this 20th day of February, 2015, to: Cameron Artigue, Esq. Christopher Hering, Esq. GAMMAGE & BURNHAM Two N. Central, 15th Floor Phoenix, AZ 85004 Attorneys for Defendants

Page 3: THE ENTREKIN LAW FIRM EVENBAUM … Pt to resp.pdfMicrosoft Word - PTS Supp to Opposition to MO for New Trial.docx Author lisa Created Date 2/20/2015 3:17:09 PM

 

3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

L. Eric Dowell, Esq. Kerry S. Martin, Esq. OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 2415 East Camelback Road, Suite 800 Phoenix, Arizona 85016 Attorneys for Defendants /s/ Lisa Balbini

Page 4: THE ENTREKIN LAW FIRM EVENBAUM … Pt to resp.pdfMicrosoft Word - PTS Supp to Opposition to MO for New Trial.docx Author lisa Created Date 2/20/2015 3:17:09 PM

EXHIBIT 1

Page 5: THE ENTREKIN LAW FIRM EVENBAUM … Pt to resp.pdfMicrosoft Word - PTS Supp to Opposition to MO for New Trial.docx Author lisa Created Date 2/20/2015 3:17:09 PM

Etiznbclh J. Fuha¡r (No. #019072)tl25 N, HaYdcn Rq¡dSsottsdule, AZ 85238'(480) S824J2J({t0) tE240l3 (fbr()akcllvfã)¡hc.g¡tcf¡¡he rtfdshc.o¡8

Of CourçelrKLEHR HARRISON HARVEYBRANZBURC LtPWilliarn A. Hurvcy (pro htc vttv pcruIlng)Kcrry E. Slsdct835 lvlarkct $r¡ocl" Suitc 1400Phitedclphie, PÀ 19103(215) 5óe-2?00(215) t68:6ó03 (fox)wharvevlâklehr.com#

kltadd@Blclu,com

SCOTTSDALE I{TIALTHCARE FI OSPTTALS,ur Arizona Corprxetion,

Plsintillìv"

GAMM./{CE &, BURNHAM, P,L.C',an Ariaon¡ Frofessional LimircdLlibllity Cornpany,

t0gfr- l. JERI€Btlark of ttp Bærlø hrtt fÙìln 0rE' hfb

røc-WmÍú!4 nr ¡úrl?¡2tHþöN Fd

üEl EE01{-UI6ó8 --iluL tll ûrRrfflr $l.lrurfl- fllnl

ruHl2{ffi1

Alan B. Kclly (No. t02699ó)

üt.G

))))))))))))

SUPERIOR COURTOFMA¡{ICOPA COUNTY

Cose No,cv 2014-01 I 668

Page 6: THE ENTREKIN LAW FIRM EVENBAUM … Pt to resp.pdfMicrosoft Word - PTS Supp to Opposition to MO for New Trial.docx Author lisa Created Date 2/20/2015 3:17:09 PM

Find

'UMMARY OF THE CASD

l. Flaintiff ánd dcfend¡nt Gomrnage &' llurnham' P'L'C' ('Çammagc" or

"Deferxlant") ¡re partitrs to u Clicnt Engrgcmcnl AgrÊenlcn¡ d¡lËd FCbrue6' l0' ?004

(,,Agrt."rr.*cnt..). pursuant to which Dcftrrdant agrced to rÊprericnr Plaintiff rvith respect to the

lìling of licns on and collcction of unprrid hcslthcüe bills {"Liûn Work')' A true snd comect

copy of tle Agreemenf nntl stttcltmcnls is uttnched us Exhibit I hereto.

Z, -I11e Agrecnrerlr flrovid€ç thar Defendant would rcccivc a 12 pcrccnt c{)nl¡ngsnt

fcç on nll collectionn rclating to thc Licn Work.

3- paragruph ? of ¡hc Agrccmenr s(otcs: "Tltis Agrecnlcnt may be tcrminoæd ut lny

rime by eit¡er Client or (ìammage & ßurnham. [xCept ilq sUbscqucntly agrcod bl' thc purties'

lermination shell ¡lqt utTr:ct, climir¡¡te or elinrinish Clicnt's obligation lo pûy attomeys' fees, and

cosrs. attrihumblc to rcc6vcries (sccurcd eirher previously or in thc futuru¡ on reimburs€nËnt

mattcrs rcfcrrcd by Clielt lo Gammege & Burnham ptior tO lcrmin¡tion."

4. In January 2014. PlainrifÌ noril'icd Dctì:nd¡nt that ít rv¿¡s terminoting its

FePftsßntåtion'

5- Dcfendånr hos con¡ended ¡hat il is ent¡lled to recovcr iß fu¡t contingent fac on any

fururc recovcrier made on the fìlcs relaring to ttrc Licn Work (*Licr¡ Filcsl, Pur$¡8nt to

poragraPh 7 of thc Agreement.

6. Flaintiff disputes thar Dcfcndant is cntitlcd to receive its contingent fee on ûßy

futurc rccovçries mtdc on the Lien Files'

7. I¡ this acrion. Plainrifl seeks a declaration (a) that parag¡âph 7 of ths Agreunent

is inrppliceble and r¡rrcnforccablc, a"nd rh¡t Plaintilf is not rcqu¡rÊd to pûy Defênd¡nt ¡ts

corrringsnr fcc for Lien Fiþs whcrc no licn was flled or no rocov€ry wrt medc pdon to ÚE

2

in the documentto to the next

ñrB,l 'Y!ÌÞllYJ

Page 7: THE ENTREKIN LAW FIRM EVENBAUM … Pt to resp.pdfMicrosoft Word - PTS Supp to Opposition to MO for New Trial.docx Author lisa Created Date 2/20/2015 3:17:09 PM

trn$ ¡

lerminålion of Defcndântls ¡crvlcet, {nd (b) that Defendant is cnlirled rc ¡ucovEr undcr the

doctrinc al qwtúum atfi,rdt ortly thc,vnlue ol'thc ¡rrviccr pcrlormcd for pl¡inriff wir.h rccpssl 16

any Licn llilesfi:turnd to þlainiiff tiy Dcfendunt" ro lhc extent rhe valrr of ruch ¡crviccscan be

provcd by Dcfcndmr,

8' Pl¡intiff fi¡rthcr gccks a conrplete accounting fronr Dclcndmr with rgspecr to the

value of thc Lieu Wçrk il perfornrecl on the Licn lríles_

9' ScotKdalc Hcallhcurc Hospitnls is a nonpmfil hcalth sytßrn thar pmvidcs

hcrlthcarc servicres in thc Scot¡s<l¿lc, Ariz.iona arËa,

l0' Oamrmge & tlumhnrn, p,L.C. is a¡ Arizon& pror€ssionst limited tiability

c{r{nFny with ¡ principal place of busincrs in phcxnix, r\rizona.

I l. Ilie Court hus gencral jurisdietiorr ovcr Cammage becausc it is inuorporeted in

Arizona, rnaintsitls a place of busircgs irr Phocnix, Arizon+ and en¡ercd inro s côntract for legal

scrvices with Plaintiff irr Ari¿ona,

12. Vent¡¿ is propcr in lhiS Court bccausc thc contract ar íssuc was crlrcrc<! into in this

counly, and thc legol scrviccs st i$ue werc rqn<lerec, to lrlaintifl in this cÕunly.

Page 8: THE ENTREKIN LAW FIRM EVENBAUM … Pt to resp.pdfMicrosoft Word - PTS Supp to Opposition to MO for New Trial.docx Author lisa Created Date 2/20/2015 3:17:09 PM

Defcnd¡fi¡ procecd to file n licn.

18. In other words, Defcndant did not fìlc u lìen for e¿ch and cvcry Licn Filc provided

to Deferdnnt by Plrintiff

19. ln exchange for the Licn \\tork, thc p¿rrti(rs rgrecd that Defendan¡ would n:ccivc a

contingcnc¡'fcs of l2 pcrccrrtol'(hc nnrount collectc<lon eacl¡ lien, Iix. I, Ex. A,p, L

20" Defenda¡lt was nt¡t entilletl to rqcoup n>ulinc çosts ôssocislüd wilh recording and

releasing lhc lÍens. fd.

Zl, Wirh rcspccr to Rcimburscntent Work, the Agreelnent estaltlish€s that Dcfcridill

will bc rcimbu¡s'c¡l for c,osts, providcri for rcpresenøtior.¡ in an ongoing reirnburÊement d¡sputc

Page 9: THE ENTREKIN LAW FIRM EVENBAUM … Pt to resp.pdfMicrosoft Word - PTS Supp to Opposition to MO for New Trial.docx Author lisa Created Date 2/20/2015 3:17:09 PM
Page 10: THE ENTREKIN LAW FIRM EVENBAUM … Pt to resp.pdfMicrosoft Word - PTS Supp to Opposition to MO for New Trial.docx Author lisa Created Date 2/20/2015 3:17:09 PM

35. lnsæad, tr¡¡agr¡ph ? insulstes Lhfcndrn¡ f¡om ¡lrc risk of performanoe bypwponedly enlitling Dcfcndrnt to tecovcr ils sonlingeni fir wjttxiut any oblrgatioo to pernorm.

36. For

enforceable.

Page 11: THE ENTREKIN LAW FIRM EVENBAUM … Pt to resp.pdfMicrosoft Word - PTS Supp to Opposition to MO for New Trial.docx Author lisa Created Date 2/20/2015 3:17:09 PM

eny nocess¡ry

Dcfendant.

45,

4{r,

Plaintiff incorporures d¡c prsccdinü, parau:raphs as if furty sel forrh herein.

Pursr¡nnt m A,R,S. g t1-l 83Zl

Any pcrson i¡tcrcsrcd under ¡ deed, will, written gontruct or olherwritings constítuting ô cçntr¡ct, t¡r'whoôc righis, slotr¡s or olhcrlcAel rclation$ uË qlfrtæd by o stalure municipql qrdinå¡rcc,cor¡lrsct or íìanchisc. ntay have. delermined any queslion ofcÕnslruction or validit¡, urising ndcr rlw instrunent, $lûlutc,ondinarrcc, contrf,ct or frunchise snd obt¡in o declamrion of rights,stall¡s or Othef légål rcl¡tions lhcrcundcr.

47, Fu4her, "[aJ eorrEæl nray bc corsfrued éhhe¡ before or aftcr there has treen ¡

brcach lhctr¡f." A.R.S, $ f 2-1833,

Page 12: THE ENTREKIN LAW FIRM EVENBAUM … Pt to resp.pdfMicrosoft Word - PTS Supp to Opposition to MO for New Trial.docx Author lisa Created Date 2/20/2015 3:17:09 PM

un¡trffi'¡l rcr¡ictlon ond cncu¡nbmnce on Pl¡intiffr righr þ courcl of lu c6ce, ord ¡¡violuivc of pgbtic Þolicy ¡s ccøbli¡hod by the Ruls¡ of Pmfcr¡sionsl colrduct. C.q¡osa v.

Ma&tgctl,Z0l4 Ariz, App. Unpub. l.FXlS 333,a¡ .l2.ti (Anz.Ct.App. Mar. tt,zl]./lr.

53. Pl¿lntiffulso s€cks a d¡,r¡lar¿tion th¡r Pl¡intifÏ ir mr requlred ø pay Dufandanr i6contingcnl fæ for thc [,icn File¡ whers no lie¡r w¡s filed or no nccovcry was mrdc.

5¿1. PlsintÍtr gccks a decla¡ation tlra: t)efendant is entillcd to ¡aeov€r rqrdcr ¡hc

doctrine of quunlum mcruit only tftc valrc of rhe scrvics rrcrformed for plainlilT wilh rc¡pect æ

'åny open Lien Files relurrcd to Plaintiflby Dcfcndant, to Lhc cxrent thc vatr¡c of ¡uch *rvlcc¡

can be pmved by Deferdrnr.

55. A dccls¡arion of the panies' rights and oblig¡lions by this Courr will æcl€ thc

conroversy.

s6. Pürsusnr ro A.R.s, g l2-ls4o, this courr may rnnkc an ownrd of co¡t¡ in

connection wilh å doclnratory judgmenl action as rnoy see m eqtrirable und just.

57- F'urünr, A.R.s, $ 12'341,01 ¡llows thc succcssful porry to rçcovcr rcarcn¡ble

atlonrcy Êcr in a contcslod ectíon arising out of o contnict.

58, Theæfore, PlainlifÌalso sæks m aumrd of cots urd anorney fcc¡ in thi¡ action.

W¡lER$FORlt, Phintiffr€spcclfuUy rtqucfts thst this Court (l) i¡cuc a dccl¿r¡rion rhu;

(a) parasrsgh 7 of tlæ AgrÊGmcnt is inapplicablc, uncnforccsblc md void for l¡ck of

consldçrÍíoo, os nr illtsory promise, a¡ r'io!¡tive of public policy, and ¡¡ an unl¡wful ¡urr¡ctbn

ond p¡cu¡r¡bronoe on Pl¡intiffs right ro counr¿l of ils choica, snd rhût Plsintiffir not rcquÍnd ro

pay lÞfcnd¡nt ¡ts 12 pérccnl cofllirlgcitl fcc for thc Liør Filcs whcrc no lico was filÊd o. Do

rüoûrrcry wa¡ ¡nrdc; rîd,(b) dg¡ Dcfend5l¡ l¡ crultlsd to recovÊr r¡nder,thc docnrlne oî qmnlüt

nømü only tlto rnluc of ¡ho rtiTlo.s perbrmod,,for Pl¡lntltr wftr rrúpGd þ'rry apar ç¡ç frih

Page 13: THE ENTREKIN LAW FIRM EVENBAUM … Pt to resp.pdfMicrosoft Word - PTS Supp to Opposition to MO for New Trial.docx Author lisa Created Date 2/20/2015 3:17:09 PM

flßh rerviccú crn b¡ provod þ(3) Srrnt ¡ucù othcr ûrd ñ¡rttã

59. Plainriffincorporû¡csrhe prtceding paragraphs as if ñ,rlly scr forrh heæin,

60' Pluin¡ifTarrd n)blendanr had an ¡B€ncy ret¡lionrhip, rvhcrcby Dçferdant se1¿ed us

Plointifls srtornoy and rcpruse nrntivc wirh rtspecr lô thê Lien work,

61. As its sllomey, Pl¡in¡ift cnin¡sted Dcfsndant w¡lh iß Lian Files and ott¡er

confidentisl information. ¡rd funher entrusted Dcfendant ro pünlue collcction on rho LiEn F'ilcs

in a manne¡ that cßßcd the bssr in¡srcís of Pl¡intillì

62. Also ss its attorncy, Defendanr owec fiduciary duries to plainriff.

63. As a rrcull of this lidrniary relalionship of ûr¡s! and confidoncc, Dcfcodanr is

bould to aëçounno Plaintifffor wotk perfomd r¡n thc Lirn File$"

u. acüv¡ry" pursuant ùo tho

Agreenrcnr.

65.

6ó. Dcfendqnt to ¡rtovldc a completo

Page 14: THE ENTREKIN LAW FIRM EVENBAUM … Pt to resp.pdfMicrosoft Word - PTS Supp to Opposition to MO for New Trial.docx Author lisa Created Date 2/20/2015 3:17:09 PM

Datcd; September 2 2, lll 4

B

Page 15: THE ENTREKIN LAW FIRM EVENBAUM … Pt to resp.pdfMicrosoft Word - PTS Supp to Opposition to MO for New Trial.docx Author lisa Created Date 2/20/2015 3:17:09 PM

VER|FICATION

I, 0¡R lhc of Pl¡¡diFsconsd¡lc l{colthcarc Horpilnls arxl urn authoriz¿¡l ro mslc this verifìçå¡fon on lt¡ bc}nlf. r

hereby vert$, urdcr pEnalry of perjury, rh¡t the f¡cts ser fonh in rhe Complaim rrctrue ¡nd correct ro lhc bc¡t of my knowlodgc or informot¡or¡ ond

f,)uod: 2014

Page 16: THE ENTREKIN LAW FIRM EVENBAUM … Pt to resp.pdfMicrosoft Word - PTS Supp to Opposition to MO for New Trial.docx Author lisa Created Date 2/20/2015 3:17:09 PM

IBIT 1

Page 17: THE ENTREKIN LAW FIRM EVENBAUM … Pt to resp.pdfMicrosoft Word - PTS Supp to Opposition to MO for New Trial.docx Author lisa Created Date 2/20/2015 3:17:09 PM

Fínd

t

cl.ln ¡T ENCAOEMENT AORBEMENT

ËIIRNHAM, p.L,C. sñd SCOTTSDALE llEÁ.LTHCAft-I("ç inro th¡s crient Enpagemenr Âgccrncnt (rhc "Agroerncñt') ¡¡ ofFcb

a

¡grccmc$l on a prqspcctive br¡ia.

coc{t,

t

¡

J. Grmm4c & Bun¡b¡¡a h¡c bænrimbr¡ner¡rcnt dtrpute witù M¡rìoop¡ County- Gatnrga&,rcper#c lcdgicæ ('blic¡f naþr n¡¡nùctl'? t!¡t rd$É lg no¡&Cli¡nt'¡ æoorldl ¡¡ wolldûñc ñrôsbcncfitofdlrfrà Mrricopr Cotdy. &loa¡ivoñl¡09 É.¡' ¡crvicc ofpæcot¡ &¡s,

¡rllll úüö

Page 18: THE ENTREKIN LAW FIRM EVENBAUM … Pt to resp.pdfMicrosoft Word - PTS Supp to Opposition to MO for New Trial.docx Author lisa Created Date 2/20/2015 3:17:09 PM

j,l4

slatqBcql" b¡siq wllh tþ ¡llocrtionrelflivc cl|imâ sl ¡råi¡e.

7,G¿rnrn¡gc & sh¡llûot sffed, cli ls,åuribulalrl" to rosovcr¡eß (securcd cilhcr previously or in thc futr¡rç) on roimbur¡cq¡ontm¡llcr¡ raferrpd by Clicnt ro Gamnragc & Ilumham príor lo tê_rñinat¡oo.

Datc: eadJ SCOTTSDALÍS HE,ALÍHCÀRB

û4, a-c.L ))

iI

II

I

:

2!¡fltrt

i , ;',:l I ¡ ,::: I ir¡ .l

i:,1.i.)..,1 ::ii;'ft

lr ,, it,l l I i ( 1, t .i

Page 19: THE ENTREKIN LAW FIRM EVENBAUM … Pt to resp.pdfMicrosoft Word - PTS Supp to Opposition to MO for New Trial.docx Author lisa Created Date 2/20/2015 3:17:09 PM

ilt

/" \G^MMr\ge ê BuRrx¡¡rr

¿t|l| r l¡4atr¡¡atr q raìlxr¡fß?ìlrl a. laatrthrtlñatçra¡ ¡, raq*¡ltlr t .aalqr Itûrt r" {í¡a¡Ë. û\¡lelr|rr { i¡al{¡É¡f¡ Glaia¡r

^¡la*tñrAghtrb r¡^3wÆrl¡llta¡alt at r^r

ti3 reñÐa çß|lfü¡" a¡iarrut: alOl.ttlrB tþoraHoßXt¡. å.rtloat¡ lloo.

Ðt^'|nYE*¡lF5

M¡sBh ?8, zoût ?^ctrrrta lltoa '|a-a.ta¡¡¡..t

trDr¡tItf?aa't ,r¡act ttta

a.5lHl¡-l¡.1 ¡. .-.at

l6rt) 2Jô¡¡¡0<ullrrur@¡blrvrcr

Lynn Kin¡. Di¡cctorP¡ticnt Éin¿asiol ScrviccsScortsdrlc Hcrlrhclrc Corp.7351 E, O¡bo¡¡ Rmd, Grourxl FloorScot¡¡d.rlc. À¡i¡on¡ 3 515 I

Rc: Fcc Agrccmcnr - Líen ond Cornmcrciol pgrlr Projcca

. Pur¡u¡rtt ro ourprcviou¡ conyertq(ions. wc ¡¡É writing to corrfirn ¡fir foe uru¡gcmcntwith rc¡flr".H to úrc l,€n ¡¡nl cornmcrclel pAyrr projcc-ts.

hrvo rgrcd rtlsr Sqor¡¡d¡lcI

II

III

pûm6fl. 3l0f pct bow for ær¡lortlÊrltùûûfÊ

robq¡ub¡t¡ûfulGúrcrrldr,wcsill

th¡hrtç¡¡ ir Íl!ÊG fr'rnrrry

Page 20: THE ENTREKIN LAW FIRM EVENBAUM … Pt to resp.pdfMicrosoft Word - PTS Supp to Opposition to MO for New Trial.docx Author lisa Created Date 2/20/2015 3:17:09 PM

I

I

I

Page 21: THE ENTREKIN LAW FIRM EVENBAUM … Pt to resp.pdfMicrosoft Word - PTS Supp to Opposition to MO for New Trial.docx Author lisa Created Date 2/20/2015 3:17:09 PM

,t

tOnt¡nrÍrE¡ArttÉar

!!(trËê..ß Íaal| ¡ta.aaaa,r4ê¡t t,Ll |]aat l¡a-.t¡

útatca'a aart€r tr¡3

$ryzrur-{¡.2aetlarû¡bt¡w¡m

atga I aar3a

Rrndy Lrstar, CFOScoßrdrlc Hcdthore362l Wcllr Frr¡oScoçsdelç. AZ 852tt

Rc: ÂnorncY's Feé - 2@l

' ÞcrrR¡¡¡d1c

'We ¡rc witin¡ ¡o t¡form Scotudalc HcrltÌ¡cÚc qf our

cqtrin pointr rrirh tc!,?cct ro orr rqærcn¡lisn ln üre rcr of liøt¡.r¿ns for 2004 rnd to Êlüify

wsre toProccedsritå oflç9rdircot¡¡¡tcd bot¡.lY &e ¡auca¡ra

hrvo

with

¡l'ltttrt

Page 22: THE ENTREKIN LAW FIRM EVENBAUM … Pt to resp.pdfMicrosoft Word - PTS Supp to Opposition to MO for New Trial.docx Author lisa Created Date 2/20/2015 3:17:09 PM

tìnd

' ¡4nayt,ulcr, CFODeccmbcr 15,2003Prgc I

. All lico ncgoóutlon¡ wilt be co¡rductet by r Gemrngt lk Bumhnm ånorñsy

-d. "rlràþtsiblc, by curt¡¡ ultrn¡n or'R¡c¡¡ra Burnh¡rn Grmrnrga &

¡hortcult could lcnd to licrr invdidrtisL

. s Gammrç ¡ts Bu¡nh¡¡n wiìl provide my ns€cssaay rcport of oür rctiviry rs

. *ut*n

tion is ñlcd in cot¡¡.flicting lian claims),¿¡¡d asscrt ¡hc licn 6 Qì

wor¡t¿tdcr

Prc€ctdir5'

¡ In thc GT,cnt ìh¡r scott¡d¡ls Hc¿lthc¡¡c i¡ n¡mcd ¡¡ a dcfcnd¿nl ln rny c¡tË

*.riâging rlre vili¿irv of r li<n or licns, a cbdlcnging lg*41:gJtù-r.:, righr to rÊcovcf ñ¡ßd¡ üro{$lr c¡crcise of iu llcn righa,

dr"SÊ-¿ ü"h*, wiu b€ palc ro dcfend on ur lrourly b¡sil ¡t is nsr¡rl" horrlYrucs'

o¡rtrêd ¡¡ r dcfonår¡¡t h litigetlon rcledn3:o r.

rnscply discom¡:d lieî pn*icr-nær (? otthig¡dd ¡ceûdq, ntbsr úü f6¡lu¡

e¡ld6 ofliq¡ l¡s¡r-

Page 23: THE ENTREKIN LAW FIRM EVENBAUM … Pt to resp.pdfMicrosoft Word - PTS Supp to Opposition to MO for New Trial.docx Author lisa Created Date 2/20/2015 3:17:09 PM

i

itndyl.u¡tø, CFODteob¡r lÍ,1001FåSÊ ¡

Ptcasc do rot h¿¡itrt¡ fo co{tt¡ct mc tf ¡ou would ltkc to discr¡ss ¡¡y of tltcst rnrr[sn¡.råtc look ¡pr!#ûü 36 conttoulng ow wolt on behrlf oiS¿ondatc tle¿lthca¡c ¡¡rd cxænd cur bcst

wiúss for r h¡my ùolìdry rcarwr rnd a ¡noeparor¡r NÊw YÊâr"

Yøy uulY Youn,

GA¡{ìv{AGE & ÈURNITAM

ByC\¡ticUlkfittt

CÀl,.U¡mrsc: MeryRetrlc

Page 24: THE ENTREKIN LAW FIRM EVENBAUM … Pt to resp.pdfMicrosoft Word - PTS Supp to Opposition to MO for New Trial.docx Author lisa Created Date 2/20/2015 3:17:09 PM

MEMONANDUMOÀXì,1^68

^ St tNHÀrd

^ tr!aÍ.!Dl L* r^-aQ Cqç.õ

TOr

Fì.OM:

RE:

Oamrnage & Burnhcm Oicnts DATEr I l/l,l/01

Richerd B, Ðurnham, Gencral Mmrgcr

Firrn Policy rs to Billing ôf C6ts

Rcæntly an Ammçafl Bcr Associltiorì sommittec issuod an cthíes opinion

indicrting that cliarls Íilrst Exprcssly agce to Pûy "rnark-up' on coslt incuned on lhcirbehrlf. ón lmg¡t nding practice h¡s been to rdd nrark-ug to o¡lly phorccopying cosb und

otrgoing frcci.nr"lo tr¡n¡unicaíoß. A¡ to.cop¡c* the sctu¡l nrark-up dopc& on vol¡r¡r-Ortt* *rt¡ ¿s ciùer plassod tluough diroctly wrñ no nark-up or ¡bcorH in our gwcrtlowrtrc¡d- Tt¡tt¡ iælu&:

C oss N ot Chqr¡c{ !o Ctriqîç

cxprtrs mait¡¡crat¡riel ovsttimasésr$ fc€iDcpøitiotts¡erlricG öfpuocêtsfllirrg føMoomgrr ¡cn¡icc,rriùGst fûca

lorry dirunceælçbortt¡nvêsiÞlaË ¡rviccsrcoord¡ng Þcrrpccid !ôd¡SÊìVcsdnr rscr¡cbhùliotu¡¡bctiF¡Ê¡cout$dÊ ¡toftüiidlal ¡crviqcstitlarçuur¡wl ogca¡c

Ifyn¡'plcrrcfcctfrsclocsll'Ifr';ðonotha¡cÈqralou rcgudlngc€tB"

Page 25: THE ENTREKIN LAW FIRM EVENBAUM … Pt to resp.pdfMicrosoft Word - PTS Supp to Opposition to MO for New Trial.docx Author lisa Created Date 2/20/2015 3:17:09 PM

Grxr¡os 6 Bunxnex-russÉlÉlrw

AtVOETS¡ at Lâ,'

r.*sLr I aù¡tlE¡hts¡ÀGt ryaÁmg u[ts

atoiltSNñ. /\ôotÞrôlLl¡. AtrtooaÄ l¡êó¿

tlrLiûùa l.êÞ lla.OarL

M¡¡ch 22, 20O4

csilûd¡¡ qôsq¡4órF ¿ tÆË

ñna[ ¡ rQ¡lwDtffi

Êræ¡ùE a rr(s XÞþËûa r. aarf¡¡

MtryRcharc,Attcñey ¡t L¡wSoottdde Hoalthcerc36itl Wclls FrgoAvenutScotlsdalc, l\ZtsZSt

Rel Cliont Engagcnent Agreerpnl urrd IIIPAA Busine¡¡ Associatc Agrecncr*

DcarMary:

I havc qrclocod lbc crocurod Scousdelc Hc¡ttlrc¡rç Br¡¡i¡¡cs¡ Âs*ociat¡ Agfærnrt in

thc form yorr roquestod. I have ¡lso cnclor€d two original Client Eogaçffint A8rcsrnôntß whl{,h¡vc bçsîrç1¡ised to delcæ any rcfcrencc to thc HIFÀA Busincss Associ¡to A8¡oancüt' Yo¡.¡ r¡dll

rccatl th¡t c'rc noad ¡ Cliqt Engrgcrncnr Agrccmcnt tcflccting tlgnilrrrt by rha clicnl duo tô t raoGot

changs in fbe R¡¡lcc of Profos¡ionaì Co¡É¡¡ct, Aroundng thut you Iìrú thc oliøt ongagenett

il¡"äãf."ccpi¡b1", I ;oü¡d appreciale it if pu would prornptly rchvn a rignod copy' Thrn¡s for

)rour alsntion þ ûi¡ rndtct'

VcrY trulY Yourr'

GAT{II{AGE & BURNIIAM

ByC\rd¡ Ullmst

Page 26: THE ENTREKIN LAW FIRM EVENBAUM … Pt to resp.pdfMicrosoft Word - PTS Supp to Opposition to MO for New Trial.docx Author lisa Created Date 2/20/2015 3:17:09 PM

FOR'Ifr SCOTTSDAIEHßÀITITCÅREAÜSIhIESgASSDCI^TEAGNEEMENT

rtcporrsibâlirles Ànd o$igatiorrs o{ Gamnrage & Sr¡rrrhasr"oúScotad¡le Healùc¡raHoapitofu puouanl to thË

:qryÊment bonvetsr Associate und Scatt¡dale Flealthc¡re Hospåtals dated FeDnrary ?,200{ ("Agroement'). Ase æiabe ¡¡¡d Sc¡tt¡dalc He¡lttrca¡e H&pÉtål¡ agrcß b üE a€ûr¡rrand conditions of this Atuchmsrt in order to corrply wit}r tàe usr and handling odFrdected Health l¡lorrn¿tím ("PFII-) urrdrr the Stand¡¡de for Privacy of IndividuallyIdanttñaHe Heålth lnfcnmation,45 CF.R $E 160,1m,16{.501 êt, r€q., as an¡errdod fromtinre !o time (*Privacy StåndaÌds'), Unlec¡ otheruise provided, all capitalizd ætrncinthis Ag¡Eert€rrt will havc the stme rncaning as provided under th€ kincyStmdards.A¡eociaÞ and Scotrsdale Hcalthcarc Hospitals willcomply with the ûerms o{ &isAttxhrnent for the d¡rrstlon of the Agrecnenl and for such other continuing periotb oprorlded in thts Atætr¡ncnt,

1, U¡e¡ ¡nd fli¿clo¡ure¡ of P¡otected He¡lth lnlorur¡tion. Aûoôci¡tc will r¡¡c¡¡td di¡close PHI only for thooe purpo€es r¡Êcessâry b psforrn ii¡ dutie¡, obtigatiors¡nd functions under dre Agreernerç or as otherwise a<preactry permitted in thtgAttachment or requirod by other law. Aseoci¡tc will not u¡o or further dfucloøeany PHfin violati'on of ùis Altachn€nt,

2. Srfe6nardr. Associate will irnplønent appropriate saftguarda tÞ prev€nt åny¡¡r€ or dirclæu¡e of PHI not otherwire perrnitted in this Atttcùnrent

3. Seportr * fmpcrrUrslble U¡e of Dl¡clo*ure. A¡e<xiae witl report toScstt¡d¡le Hentttrare Hoøpitcb any u¡c or disclsure of PHI not pcús¡itbd by thlsôttachrÌrcnt withtn ffve bn¡slnór deys of Associab'r leerningof ¡uch uta ordisclosuta

d. Agcnfr ¡nd Sqbconürctor¡. U Aâsociâte providcs PtII to ânegent orrubørtnAor for a pwpooe autho¡ized u¡lds the Agreenrentand úe Aftachr¡trrçA¡eocí¡na will ll¡¡t enter lnÞ r r¡¡rittn contr¡ct wlth the agent or rubconfacto¡ thrtrtqulr,ec the agørt ø suboq¡tracbr to atrc-e tûôppl&ablê to A¡cætate ¡ u¡eand disclo$urt ofAacociate will m¡intrin e li¡t d any euch di¡clorruer to rgsnlr or nrboonrractæe ae

p{orrtdÊd Íìgèc6o¡I ol thl¡ Att¡chment

will

Page 27: THE ENTREKIN LAW FIRM EVENBAUM … Pt to resp.pdfMicrosoft Word - PTS Supp to Opposition to MO for New Trial.docx Author lisa Created Date 2/20/2015 3:17:09 PM

u, gcottdr¡€ nGdthßüc dryr of a rcff€[tby Scottsdale tlcalthcarr llorp e¡Eoctnæ w¡'ntnrke requested pHl avallable

b. ?¡tienr Asccsr. lf I Patient reqüesu Êc(res to PllI dírecåly from¡ssoclatQ. Asaod¡te will within ñve br¡sinËs days forward such lequest Ín wrtting toScottsdåle Healthca¡e Hæpitals, Scottdale He¿lthcare Floepitnts will be røpordbfu fcurâk günt or forplüend n¿tisrrg. ltospihlowill rele¡ra PHt to th¿ PeHe,nt pur&rant tû euch a requert,

6. Acr¡¡ to PEI.

7. Amcadmeni of F?lL Witlün five buainqa dryo of rccefvirg a requestbmrSce¡nxdele Hedtlc¡¡e Hæpitele to o¡nend ¡ Patienfs PHl, Aseociatewiü providesuchinformation to Scott¡drle Heelt}ra¡e Hospitrle for ar¡rcr¡dmcnt. tf the Scott¡daleHealürcn¡e Hocpitala' FÈguÊst irrciudes spedfic info¡matisn to bc includßd ln tñe PHI a¡ån ¡ncndnrcr'¡t" Ageociat! wilt incorporaæ cuch ¡.mcndment wilhin five burfnera dayro( ræipt of úre ScottsdÂle Healll¡care Hospitals requert. Aseociatc will forwa¡d þoScmt¡dah llcqlttrcrs Hcpitsals within five business days any regu€rÈs þy Pat¡Gnrb þAssoc¡åtc to âlrsd PHI withiru Sættsdalet{€åJthøre Hoopltale will beæcpcncible fcrE ¡kirg afl detsrrirrations regnrding mendmcno to Pl{l ând nrmiate witt ¡¡ralc ¡ros¡ch detsm¡¡ì¡tisrs"

E" Ancoudf&g d Di¡clorr¡res; Requætr for Dl¡ctrocu!€.

a. Ell¡clcu¡c Rcca¡d¡. ^Ë6odate

wlll keep a ncord oÍ my dl¡clo¡ruornrde ¡o lts a€cnr+ ¡trbænl¡acære or ottw¡ third par6er for any pu4loce otlrar thant

(1) Þùsclourec to health care providcre b ssiÁl i¡ ùe Ecaurrcnt ofpatienlu;

{2) D4ælo¡urc¡ to oth6s to æsist the Scpþdale Hedùcare Hoopttôb inoùtainìng p¡ysr€nÞ

(3) Dicclosures to othe¡¡ þ æs¡ct the SootbdÂle lle¿ttlrcarç Xoeptalc inconducdng ttr heslth cse o,peratlorc. ae dcfiñÊd ln 45 C-F"R I f6Afllû.

Asocüaæ will rnain¡i¡¡ ¡¡6 dirlcrrrc rtand fot tùa hr:ûr of the Agncrncnta¡d úrrdx yane ftør the ¿fiacrive d¡u o¡ mrrtlmdon of ttrc Àgrænt

:III

I

Page 28: THE ENTREKIN LAW FIRM EVENBAUM … Pt to resp.pdfMicrosoft Word - PTS Supp to Opposition to MO for New Trial.docx Author lisa Created Date 2/20/2015 3:17:09 PM

ì

(l ) Tlþ dåtr c{ dì¡clooure;(1) Tr€ n¡mc oû the entity ot Pcrton who rcodvod tl¡e FHl, ¡¡ú thÊ

¡ddle¡¡ of euch ønüty or p€rcoûl, tf l¡nown.(3) A de¡crípüon d the PHI dlxloced; and(4) A bricf Srterncnt of tlre purpæ of the di¡closr¡a

c. P¡ticnt RÉqr¡til for Dl¡cloaue Recmdr. Wlthin five busiræ dayr olreodpt of ¡ noticc ftom Soon¡d¡le Hcalthcars Hæpllals to Ateoci¡te of ¡ P¡derrf r

provtde Scottsd¡le Henlthc¡¡clÉd ln tlr ndt¡æ. AËõoclôta wlll provåde

tle ¡scords qr the dme pertod requested þ ttrc Patlentor Íor eix yearr beóore the datesr which tlrc accou¡ting was r€qu€ated by the F¡ticnt, Es tct forth in the notice.beglnntng on Apll 1{. 2fi}3,

d, P¡tl:nl Requcct to A¡¡oeirtc. lf ¡ Patisrt requetB an acoountíng otdi¡cloot¡¡es dircctly frsûr Alsociaì€, .Asrociate will forwurd the regueot toScottsd¡leHe¿ltl¡ca¡e Hæpiblr with¡n 6ve h¡sinss,s daye of Asúociåte-s mcelpt of the æquesq and

will rl¡Lc it¡ r¡nord¡ of di¡cloor¡ra av¡il,able ùo9cottedâlêHeolthca¡e l{ocpttalsaaotherudae povidcd ¡¡¡ thie Section. Hospitsl will be re*pørsible to PæÞüe and deltverytrr rccardi of disclocu¡e to the Prt¡eil. Aococf¡te wåll rrct providc ¡n ¡clot¡Rting ol ltrdtecloeu¡c dirnctty to tÌ¡e tndlvtdual.

¿ küod¡te U¡e for Menegcment ¡nd Âdmini¡trrt¡oe Associâle inry use PHI

for d¡e nÊflx¡g[ry manageu'rnt and qdminis&atìon of Assodâlê' or to carry otlt lhe hgdreapøuibiltticr oJ tls Ascociats ¡I:

¡. Ttæ disdæurc is required by low; or

b. :l¡¡odate g€cr¡¡e$ wrltton aasunrre ¡¡ ect forth tn E<htbit f þ thbA$aclunent &ønthÊ rælving party that thc receM¡8 pr¡ty will: (i) hcld th3 fHtcøfidctrr¡alty; (ü) lrc or diælocc thc f'Hl only aa roquflcd byúor wlrlch it ú¡¡s d¡æloúcd to ths rftiPinn$ n¡d (tü) nÕtÍfy thê

in thccmffderdrlltY of the PHI'

10. Scdt¡d.tG Hcrtthcrr Horpilrlr E¡scblon o'f Infcrnotfon to A¡¡ocl6c onß¡¡trtcitm¡.

Page 29: THE ENTREKIN LAW FIRM EVENBAUM … Pt to resp.pdfMicrosoft Word - PTS Supp to Opposition to MO for New Trial.docx Author lisa Created Date 2/20/2015 3:17:09 PM

a, ltclurn oÍ PIll¡ Dcrüructlm" Within til¡rty dryr d rerr¡ftrton ofAg¡canent, Assodåte will ctr¡rn ùo Sco¡pd¡þ llÉr¡thctle-HGb¡tlh ¡l¡ PHI reccivedftün Ho¡Hospitalarnaintain hæmay, upon Scotbdqlc Hedttrcare Hoopítalr writterr coneêrit des&ay dl n¡ch nA ¡ndprcnride wdtrfl dosumentåticxrof euch de¡l uctiorr- The requirernctrt to Ëà¡rn ordeotroy such PHI will apply ùo all agenb or subconb¡ctor8be responeiHe for rccovering any PI{I fium such qge¡rtc orcannot obÊBin the PHI Ímm any agent ar ¡ubmntrxror, Agcnr wlll so nolfy Sco,tudaleHÊdtk ta ltogpital¡ and rvill requilc that such igen6 orsubcontr¡ctorô dirtcty r*tuúnPHI ùo SaotCdale HÉlÈÌtil€ HosplÈals or otlranølce de*tmy zuch PlIl, ru!þt to tfteEûlg ûf tàia Sectlon.

b- Alttrn¡five Mce¡u¡ec. If Asæiate beBeve¡ that rctunring ordettroying PHI at th€ tErmlñåtion of the A¡reernent le lnfeaeible, lt will providewrlttannotice to *oüsdale Healthca¡e Hoapitalr wiürin five businers dnyr of the effect¡in d*teof termin¡rion of the Ag¡sernent- Such notice will s€t foill¡ ttre cfucusr¡tar¡cer th¡tAsod'ah ùdier¡es rn¡ke¡ tlæ rchrrn or d€ffr¡ction of PHI irrle¡otble a¡rd the alærnativenlèâgl¡rec lhat A¡¡oclate çeæmmend¿ for ase'urtng tlrc continued confidenti¡llty ândrecurily of the PHl. Scottsdele Healttrcq¡e Hæpitals promptly wlll nottfy A:c€cirle ûfwh€thcr it agñGs tlut ttre Étum or destrurtion of PHI i¡ infeasibte. U lhe ScottÐd¡leHe¡lth€rc Hcpltale ageer that return or destn¡ction of PHL lc infeaeibls, AÉcocbtêagnses to oæ¡rd ell protrctione, llrntationc and reeFictions of this Alt¡chment þo

Asræùic¿c uge or dlacloeu¡e of FHI r€tain€d lfer terminatbn of thb Agrærrnnt â¡ú blimit further uÊes or discloru¡cc þ tlrosc purPoscs thåt ñrkc thc rctum ar dean¡ctåon of$è Pril l¡úer¡iblc. Any arch ca(ùÈnded protectionc, ltmltâüoñ¡ ¡nd ¡e¡trfcüons tt¡lllapply to anyrger*r o¡ ¡ubconuactort d Associate for whom rch¡rn ot dcatrncüo¡rofPt{t b debrsrinrd by ftott!&le Healtlrca¡e Hoepildr to bc lnfureible. If Scot¡d¡le

Page 30: THE ENTREKIN LAW FIRM EVENBAUM … Pt to resp.pdfMicrosoft Word - PTS Supp to Opposition to MO for New Trial.docx Author lisa Created Date 2/20/2015 3:17:09 PM

Hmpltrle, tha Agrmrt wlll tÊÌmlnåùe aú provtded ¡n Sco$rd&lc H€û¡Étcr¡€Hocpital/ notice.

13. å¡¡ocfr¡G Book¡ rnd Rerordc.

a. 9cott¡dale He¡lth¡¡rc Hæpitels Aac¿rc" Assoct¡te will, wiùin fivcbusintas daye of Scmsd¡le FlêslútcsrÊ Hocpitalc'written rcquest, rnake availablcduring norrrat businoúû hourt at /{soci3te's officer, dl rccord¡, books, agreerrurtc,policies erd procedue* reJadng to the use o,r dlscloe¡¡¡e o{ PHI for ths purporc o{atbwing Scottsdale He¡ltÌrca¡e Hocpitats to dèterm¡ne Aæociaæ's compliarce wiütthÊAgreerrørt and this Att¡ch¡rìent,

b. Govanmcnl Acccsr. Arsociåle will m¡ke its intcrnal practices, booksard ¡eccrds on the usc and disclosu¡'e of PHI available to the See,etary oÉ thetÞportrnent of Henlth and Human Se¡vìce¡ to the cxtent required for determiningcornplirncc with the Privacy Stonda¡ris ¿nd any other provirioru of HIPAA ¡¡d HIPAAr€gulåìiof¡s Notwlthctanding thir provisioru no åtttrn€y-diÊnt, accouñ6fit<llentorq{her lef!¡ privilege will be dee¡t¡¡d waivod by Æsociåte orSoottsd¡le Healt}¡carcHcpitrls u a ¡e*ult oú thls Secdon.

1{ Nottcc¡. Any notices rcquírcd under thi¡ Attachrncr¡twil be cent tc tùe

parrÉer at the foltowirrg ¡ddres by tirst class rnel, fax or hand delivery:

Soott¡dnle Healthcare Hocpitals; Aseoci¡te:

Robut 8. lcnsçn :.

ilúÍ*Jt¡. Ðri¡¡lcraþr Ðlvd.sconrd¡Ic. az 8õ25144@ -Far: &XÞ#.-Attr-

6,-^t"t*.f?t

ASÉOC|ÀrE

Dûte