the enemy is being badly hurt now. the end is sure,
TRANSCRIPT
THE ENEMY is being badly hurt now. The end is sure,
though the time is unpredictable. First hand observation by
representatives of the administration shows the Russians
murdering the German armies even more effectively than
their communiques indicate. British and American overhead
attack on Germany and its European production and
transportation centers is devastating.
Signs of difficulty, though not necessarily weakness, are
plain to military observers of Germany. The speeches of
their leaders have the sound of defeat; they no longer display
the Teutonic bluster. They have stopped their familiar threats
of "a thousand to one"; they promise their people nothing
but hardship and death. They talk of defense, and vow
against capitulation; they inveigh against the Soviets, but
leave the way open for peace with England and. the United
States.
Their defeats in Russia are due to exhaustion of
manpower, to the rigors of winter, to the length of supply
lines. A strong factor, of course, is the amazing unity and
fighting spirit of the Russian people. Allied threats of
invasions cause the Nazis to spread their forces all over
Europe. Especially is this true in Southern Europe, from
which an Anglo-American attack may come at any time the
Axis may be pushed out of Africa.
The Russians, however, fully expect a renewal of
Germany's attack in the spring, and are making all
preparations to meet it. The Allies expect the Nazis to step
up their U-boat war with the coming of better weather.
Submarine action against the Allies is now worse than ever,
despite constant air attack on Nazi construction pens. The
United States is pressing its production of
escort vessels to the limit, for the submarine is
still one of the most "unbeatable" weapons in
warfare. Of course it works both ways ― our
subs are weakening the Japs because they are
unable to build merchant ships as fast as we
can.
Not the least factor in the pressure on the Germans is the
Anglo-American bombardment of Europe. The earlier attack
by the Nazis on England was nothing by comparison. The
arrogant and vindictive Goering tried to break England by
plastering the cities. But the Allied attack is on rail and
production centers, on waterfronts, and on every military
concentration that can be found. Allied hedgehoppers cover
the face of Europe like a pox, puncturing locomotives, oil
tanks, and trucks by hundreds.
So effective is the air war against Europe that you can find
high officials in Washington and elsewhere who believe
Germany still may be beaten that way. That there is some
support for this theory is shown by the fact that large orders
for tanks and certain classes of transport and mobile
weapons have been canceled, and the material and manhours
have been diverted to aircraft. The President keeps telling
Hitler that we will hit him hard somewhere in Europe. Of
course, it's a good idea to tell him that, regardless of the
plans of Allied staffs.
If the general staff had in mind an all-air thrust at Europe,
the problems involved would be tremendous. Until you take
pencil in hand and start adding up, with the help of a
military aviation authority, what it takes to run an air show,
you may be inclined to think of aviation as a royal shortcut
to avoid the grind of battle on the ground. Just recall that
months ago the British mustered a few thousand-plane raids
on Europe. At that time they talked about three-thousand-
plane assaults. Since then the United States has established a
second air force in England, but still there are no attacks
anywhere near that scale.
It takes great supplies of men, oil,
spares, food, airfields, and warehouses
to sustain an air campaign. The casual
observer wading through the figures is
likely to feel he is having one of those
nightmares in which he tries to run and
can't. Fuel, for example, is a
particularly hard problem. Combat air
engines burn more than 50 gal apiece
per hr, and planes probably average
about two engines each. It is more than
likely ― and this is only informed
guessing ― that fuel is one of the
worst of bad gremlins we have to deal
with in the African project.
Not one of our aviation theatres ―
and we have a dozen or so ― is nearer
than 2,000 mi from home base, some
of them are 6,000 or 7,000. Hitler, by
contrast, is in no case operating more
than 1,500 mi from factory to front. He
is only a couple of hours from his
British targets but, per contra, the
British are only a couple of hours from
some of theirs. Yet, after four years of
war, and after the production of
perhaps 200,000 planes to fight this
war, we still read about 10, 50, 300, or
so, taking part in an action.
Hitler had ten years to prepare the
plant to build any number of airplanes
necessary to overcome all opposition,
but he made several serious
miscalculations ― the worst being that
he would strike one stunning blow
with the designs current at that time.
Now, considering the huge task of
designing and developing new models
to meet those of his enemies, his
Luftwaffe is so weak that many
observers cannot help but express their
surprise.
There must be a combination of
reasons for this condition, but even
War Secretary Stimson appears not to
know what it is. He says that we may
have overestimated Germany's
capacity for producing airplanes in the
first place; that Germany may be
suffering a severe shortage of aviation
gasoline; or that she may be gathering
her air power for an offensive of which
we are not yet aware. If we do not
think any of these explanations is very
convincing, we may assume that the
secretary has a better one which he is
keeping to himself.
But the difficulties that beset the
building of air forces are not enough to
stall the great industrial and manpower
of the United States. Our production is
past 6,000 per month, and of all the
vast factories and millions of workers
and mountains of metal and supplies
going into the war production
machine, more than 40 percent is now
devoted to aircraft.
Nevertheless, our troubles are many:
We have irresponsible absentee
workers by the thousands every day;
our engine production gets ahead of
plane output; we still cannot deliver
forgings and castings fast enough;
"change orders" come from the front
so fast that often only 10 or 20 planes
are made alike; we set up modification
centers to keep from stopping the
production line, and the centers burn
up the manhours; then we have to drop
a model entirely and start on another
one. That will happen several times in
1948. Not the least of problems is the
oracle at Washington from which all
programs flow. Some of the best
managers from industry ― not bureau-
crats ― are there, but the demands on
them are almost too much for human
wit at its best.
The very mountainous proportions
of the aircraft program in the war are
becoming more and more of liability
for peace, and some bosses can't resist
taking an eye from the immediate goal
for an occasional glance into the
future. It is rather appalling to think
that nearly half the industrial power of
the United States has been converted
to aviation; that before the war ends it
may be more than half. It's going to be
a morning after the night before when
the show is over and a great deal of
this plant capacity has to get back to
egg beaters, wheelbarrows, dollar
watches, or what have you.
Nothing much is being done about
that, as they say, except that the boss
must lean back and give it a couple of
thinks now and then. As we have
reported before, the aircraft people are
aware that they are qualified, by new
techniques and familiarity with new
materials, to make a large number of
old things in very new and interesting
ways. And when the time comes they
will ― they will have to.
Operation of airplanes, come peace,
is of immediate national and inter-
national interest, and steps have
already been taken to meet swift turns
of events. Complicated events, too. It
so happens, that because the United
States is on the other side of the world
from the war and because we are
manufacturers, our chief role has been
the Arsenal of Democracy. In that
capacity, we needed a lot of airlines to
girdle the world. We established them
forthwith. Meanwhile, England,
Holland, Italy, France, and Germany
have neither the time for airlines nor
the airplanes to equip them. So the war
will end with the American flag on
airways all over the world.
This situation, like Topsy, "just
growed," and since the war started
there has been little, if any, time to
consider its implications. For another
thing, even though Pan American
Airways began foreign operations
about 17 years ago, the country still
lacks a foreign aviation policy. For
several years before the war, the
government indulged in small-time
horse trades with England, France,
Germany, Italy, and Holland, on who
could run an airline where. Before
bigger things showed up, there were
times when conniving over a
Toonerville line to some Pacific atoll
was good for a three-day run in
Washington's bars.
At any rate, we had no policy when
the war started and, as of now, all
deals are off. We have the airlines.
This situation began to disturb the
British a few weeks back, so that
certain MPs felt obliged to warn
Britain against our monopoly, and
even went so far as to recommend
boycott of our lines. Washington was
caught flat footed, with no plans and
no basis from which to make a reply.
The President quickly appointed an
interdepartmental committee to study
the matter and make recommend-
ations. Its deliberations thus far have
been strictly secret. This committee
has matters on its mind for heavier
than Britain's fears, although the
administration certainly does not want
any quarrel with England about
airlines. The committee has to decide
what the United States will stand for
when it goes to the peace table,
For centuries, the nations have held
that the seas are free to all. No country,
attaches any claim to the ocean. But
the air is different ― it goes right over
the land, all of which belongs to
somebody. Shall the aircraft of the
various nations be allowed to take any
route they wish, over other countries,
or do all countries have sovereign
rights in their overlying air, not to be
intruded upon? This is the biggest
question that has come before aviation
since the barnstormers started work
without law, license, or rules. We
certainly wouldn't expect the
Mexicans, for instance, to allow us to
run a railroad across their country. Is
an airline entirely different?
When the President's committee
decides this question, the final answer
will still be a long way off, because we
can only recommend to the
international air commission (or
whatever name) which will be part of
the final peace machinery. The
Russians and the Argentines and the
Portuguese and the Greeks will all
have their ideas, too.
Whether we have freedom of
sovereignty of the air, we shall have to
decide whether we have freedom of
entry. That is, can anybody start an
airline to any port in the world. You
can practically do that with steamships
― if you want to. Would the low-wage
countries drive us out of the air, as
they drove our merchant ships off the
seas?
It is a safe guess that our gov-
ernment does not intend to try to
harness the planet's air operations, just
because the war threw them into our
lap. We couldn't follow up such a
policy even if we wanted to. But, since
the future of the United States in world
air commerce is being made now, we
ought to watch all the plays.
This article was originally published in
the March, 1943, issue of Aviation
magazine, vol 42, no 3, pp 90-91, 370,
373-374.