the effects of specimen width on tensile properties of triaxially

14
The Effects of Specimen Width on Tensile Properties of Triaxially Braided Textile Composites John E. Masters Lockheed Engineering and Science Peter G. Ifju Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Christopher M. Pastore and Alexander E. Bogdanovich North Carolina State University N95-28825 +.. OUTLINE INTRODUCTION- DEFINITION OF MATERIAL STATEMENT OF PROBLEM )" EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS - MOIRE INTERFEROMETRY STRENGTH & MODULUS SUMMARY FUTURE WORK The objective of this study was to examine the effect of the unit cell architecture on the mechanical response of textile reinforced composite materials. Specifically, the study investigated the effect of unit cell size on the tensile properties of 2-D triaxially braided graphite epoxy laminates. The figures contained in this paper reflect the presentation given at the conference. They may be divided into four sections as the outline listed above illustrates. A short definition of the material system tested is contained in the next figure. This is followed by a statement of the problem and a review of the experimental results. The experimental results consist of a Moire interferometry study of the strain distribution in the material plus modulus and strength measurements. Finally, a short summary and a description of future work will close the paper. 523 https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19950022404 2018-04-10T00:17:37+00:00Z

Upload: nguyenkhue

Post on 11-Feb-2017

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

The Effects of Specimen Width onTensile Properties of

Triaxially Braided Textile Composites

John E. MastersLockheed Engineering and Science

Peter G. IfjuVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Christopher M. Pastoreand

Alexander E. BogdanovichNorth Carolina State University

N95-28825

+..

OUTLINE

INTRODUCTION-

DEFINITION OF MATERIAL

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

)" EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS -

MOIRE INTERFEROMETRY

STRENGTH & MODULUS

• SUMMARY

• FUTURE WORK

The objective of this study was to examine the effect of the unit cell architecture

on the mechanical response of textile reinforced composite materials.Specifically, the study investigated the effect of unit cell size on the tensile

properties of 2-D triaxially braided graphite epoxy laminates.

The figures contained in this paper reflect the presentation given at theconference. They may be divided into four sections as the outline listed above

illustrates. A short definition of the material system tested is contained in the nextfigure. This is followed by a statement of the problem and a review of theexperimental results. The experimental results consist of a Moire interferometrystudy of the strain distribution in the material plus modulus and strengthmeasurements. Finally, a short summary and a description of future work willclose the paper.

523

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19950022404 2018-04-10T00:17:37+00:00Z

am

rrm

,,:I:m

X

/

n"I.=

--Z<l:rrrr<_>..

>..

524

' Io_m

oo_

0

i:::1 ==_o

m

£

==_o._

m

,<

525

SMALLEST UNIT CELL

UNIT CELL DIMENSIONS

MATERIAL

A1

B1

B2

WIDTH (in.) HEIGHT (in.)

0.48 0.12

0.42 0.09

0.46 0.08

A convenient way to describe textile preforms is to identify a unit cell of material- a repeatable unit of fabric geometry. The unit cell represents the completeyarn intertwinement pattern. The unit cell approach has become the foundationof textile analysis and serves as a convenient framework in which to interpretexperimental data.

The rhombic frame shown in the figure defines a unit cell for the 2-D triaxiallybraided material studied in this program. For computational purposes, it isdesirable to define the smallest unit cell possible. In some analyses,rectangular unit cells are also required. The rectangular section shown in thefigure represents the smallest unit sell identified.

The table shown above contains the dimensions of the unit cells for the three

architectures tested. The unit cell width is dependent on the mandrel diameterand the number of yarns braided. The height of the unit cell is dependent oncell width and the braid angle.

Although three architectures are being investigated by NASA and Boeing, thisstudy featured specimens made from the B2 architecture only.

526

MATERIAL ARCHITECTURE ANDTEST COUPON GEOMETRY

Having defined the unit cell, the question then becomes one of defining degreeof heterogeneity within the unit cell. Moire interferometry provided insight intothe magnitude of the strain variation in these braided materials. The next threefigures summarize the results of the Moire investigation. These slides were alsoreported in a previous study presented at the conference (Experimental andAnalytical Characterization of Triaxially Braided Textile Composites by Masterset. al.).

The strain field inhomogeneity will define the specimen design and theinstrumentation used. Determining the effect of this inhomogeneity onexperimental results was the subject of this paper.

As an example, consider the tensile coupons used to measure the strength andmodulus. The specimen, which is shown in the figure, is 9.5 in. long and 1.5 in.wide. The rectangular section shown in the figure represents the unit cell of theB2 material. As the figure illustrates, the specimen is three unit cells wide. Thespecific objective of the study was to determine if the specimen width affectedthe tensile property measurements.

527

MOIRE INTERFEROMETRY2-D Triaxial Braid - 1200 Microstrain

.,4._._ 1.50 in.

©

+:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:+:.:.:,:,:.:.:+:,:.:,:.:.::.:.::.:.:.:,:.:.:.;.:.:.:+:.:.:.:.:,:.:.:.:.:,:.:+:.:.:.:*:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiil

.50 in.

V DISPLACEMENT FIELD

As indicated earlier, Moire interferometry was used to define the full fieldstrain distribution in these braided specimens. The technique defines

deformation patterns in both the vertical and horizontal directions. These resultsare shown in this and the following figure.

The vertical displacement fields (V fields) consist of basically horizontal fringes;this indicates specimen extension where points along one fringe have been

displaced vertically with respect to points along a neighboring fringe. For auniform extension the fringes should be evenly spaced and straight. Thefringes for the specimens tested, however, are wavy and the spacing betweenthem varies. The variation is cyclic and coincides with the repeated unit of thetextile architecture.

528

MOIRE INTERFEROMETRY2-D Triaxial Braid - 2400 Microstrain

_,_ 1.50 in.

U DISPLACEMENT FIELD

©

©

.50 in.

The horizontal displacement patterns (U fields ) consist of zigzag verticalfringes that display the Poisson effect. For uniform contraction the fringesshould be straight and the spacing constant. The fringes however display avariation which is cyclic, and matches that of the weave geometry. The sharpkinks in the U field fringes reveal the presence of shear strains between thefiber bundles.

529

ENLARGED VIEW OF TWO UNIT CELLS - V FIELD

i "ENLARGED VIEW OF TWO UNIT CELLS - U FIELD

The figure shows the V and U fields of a highly magnified region ofspecimen that consists of two unit cells. The boundaries between adjacent fiberbundles and the outline of the cells are marked. It was revealed that the sheardeformation at interfaces between the fiber bundles occurred over a finite width.

This width is illustrated in the patterns as the distance between the closelyspaced lines. This is consistent with the presence of the resin rich areasbetween the fiber bundles, which was on the order of one fifth of the width of the

fiber bundle itself. The U field shows that the shear strain 7xy in the resin rich

zones was on the order of 0.5 times that of the average applied normal strain _y.Additionally, the U field shows that the Poisson effect was nearly constant

across the unit cell. The V displacement pattern clearly shows that the strain Eyvaries significantly within each unit cell as can be seen by the nonuniform

fringe spacing. The ratio of maximum strain _y to minimum strain was about 2.1.The normal strain varies on top of the fiber bundles and is nearly constantthroughout all of the resin rich zones.

530

Test Specimen Configuration

Four 0.500 in. x 0.180 in.

Strain Gages mounted on

each specimen :.-':_. "S-_:

- _..-_. >._: .

1.0 in. to 4.0 in.

19.50 in.

A series of tensile tests were conducted to experimentally determine the effectof specimen width of modulus and strength. The coupons used in this study areshown in the figure. Specimen width was fixed at 9.5 in. Length, however,varied from 1.0 in. to 4.0 in. in one inch increments. All specimens featured theB2 triaxial braid described in the previous table. They were loaded in the 0 °, orlongitudinal direction.

Each specimen was instrumented with five 0.500 in. long strain gages as shownin the figure. The strain gages effectively spanned five unit cells in thisdirection.

531

U'- I'.-.

B

tt_ e¢_

_U"-¢",1

e,e_ ,,_!• tt'_ e_tr_ It_

I •

v-_ v-,,q

v-q v-_ v-q v-_

v-_ v-_ ¢".1 ¢_• •

! I

v-_ v-,q| !

¢",1

! !

v-_ v-_! |

¢".1 ¢",t

! |

! |

¢',.1

It) ¢,e_

¢",.I v-q

tr) ',_!"

v-_ v_

v-_ v-q

_¢',1v-_ v-q

! !

| !

¢',1 ¢',1

532

EFFECT OF SPECIMEN WIDTH OF MODULUS

(Normalized to 55% Fiber Volume)

8.00-

7.00,

_._ 6.00,

03=Z 5.oo.

03:_ 4.00,--I

t'_ 3.00.O

2.00.

1.00.

0.00

[] Center[]

1.0

Edge

2.0 3.0 4.0

SPECIMEN WIDTH (in.)

The results of the longitudinal modulus measurements are shown in the figure.A total of eight specimens, two at each width, were tested. The modulimeasured at the specimen edges were averaged and are compared to theaverage moduli measured at the center of the specimen. Specimens weremachined from several different panels whose fiber volume content varied. Thedata, which was shown in tabular form in the previous slide, was normalized to55% fiber volume to isolate width effects.

The data indicate little edge to center variation in modulus. They alsodemonstrate no significant variation with specimen width.

533

U'J

-I-F-

ZLUEF--(/1

70.00

60.00,

50.00,

40.00,

30.00,

20.00,

10.00,

0.00

EFFECT OF SPECIMEN WIDTH OF STRENGTH(Normalized to 55% Fiber Volume)

f///"////

.... V//'/

CLL_JiJJ

N.... 7/'/Z

1.0

_////

N_ff//

_f!/t

_Jf/J/J/J¢

_///,F////

_///i

F//_*F///_

_1111

f/l/.

//_,-/

/'//_

2.0

///J

p'//,p'//_

///////#

IllJ

///#////

///#

///#

////

-///#

-///#

3.0

SPECIMEN WIDTH (in.)

,,'//j

F/J-_,

f//_,

,'/J_,/-//_,

,-//_, ////I//_. ////

Ff/_.F///

F/J_,

,,-/f_

_'///

_J ....

4.0

The tensile strength results are shown in this figure. Like the moduli data, theytoo have been normalized to 55% fiber volume to isolate the effect of specimenwidth. The results, again, reflect no effect of width on mechanical response.

534

iii

0 /111

iii Illk-l l

I/) iii

¢_ 0 "__- > 0" ""

• ¢)

¢" 00 _ 0 "0

E o"" © 0 _ I= 0

"0

g _E "

o o o

0 -'-' ,-_ O_

"0 "" _ ¢='4,-, 0

_ _ .,.-.

535

FUTURE WORK

INVESTIGATE SIZE EFFECTS INOTHER TEXTILE COMPOSITES

),.- DEVELOP ANALYSES TO PREDICTMATERIAL RESPONSE

NASA is in the process of initiating an analytical and experimental program todevelop standard test methods for textile composites. This program willdevelop tension, open-hole tension, compression, open-hole compression, andshear test methods for woven, braided, and stitched textiles. The results of this

investigation will be applied to that program.

Specifically, this study has identified the magnitude of the straininhomogeneities within the unit cell and has demonstrated the effectiveness ofMoire interferometry in defining the full field strain distribution in these textilecomposites. Interferometry will be applied to all material forms investigated inthe test methods development program to guide specimen design andinstrumentation. One objective of the program is to develop sets of criteria to beapplied to all textiles.

This study also identified that width effects did not exist for these particulararchitectures. An experimental data base will be developed to determine if thisis true for other architectures.

536