The Effect of Internal Marketing on Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment an Emp

Download The Effect of Internal Marketing on Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment an Emp

Post on 12-Nov-2014

5.708 views

Category:

Documents

3 download

Embed Size (px)

TRANSCRIPT

<p>The 1 PPM National Conference on Management Research Manajemen di Era Globalisasi Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen PPM, 7 November 2007</p> <p>st</p> <p>The Effect of Internal Marketing on Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment: An Empirical Study in a University SettingSabrina O. Sihombing Maredo Gustam University of Pelita Harapan Karawaci</p> <p>Abstract The competition in higher education institutions becomes more competitive than ever. To win the competition, the institutions need to satisfy the customer (i.e., students and potential students). Satisfied customer can be achieved if the employees are satisfied. Internal marketing is a concept which emphasizes that employees are internal customers and jobs as internal products. Jobs should be developed and to motivate employees in order to satisfy employees needs and wants. Therefore, internal marketing relates to job satisfaction. Job satisfaction itself is one of important factors that explain organizational commitment. The purpose of this article is to test the effects of internal marketing on job satisfaction and organizational commitment. The data for this research was obtained through selfadministered questionnaire from lecturers in a private university in West Java. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to analyze the data. The findings show that internal marketing was a significant predictor of organizational commitment. This article provides limitations of the study, and directions for future research. Key words: internal marketing, job satisfaction, organizational commitment Background to the research problem The competition in higher education institutions becomes more competitive than ever. To win the competition, the institutions need to satisfy the customer (i.e., students and potential students). Satisfied customer can be achieved if the employees are satisfied (Schultz 2002; Kotler 2000; Pitt, Bruwer, Nel, and Berthon 1999). Internal marketing is a concept which emphasizes that employees are a first market (Gronroos 2001; Ewing and Caruana 1999). According to Kotler (2000), internal marketing should be as a priority before external marketing. As stated in the beginning, excellent services to customers are resulted from satisfied employee. Therefore, in relating with to win competitions, successful marketing can be achieved if the firms are involved both in external and internal marketing (Caruana and Calleya 1998). According to Berry and Parasuraman (1991 cited by Caruana and Calleya 1998), the concept of internal marketing focus on employees are internal customers and jobs as internal products. Jobs should be developed and to motivate employees in order to satisfy employees needs and wants. Therefore, internal marketing relates to job satisfaction. Job satisfaction itself is one of important factors that explain organizational commitment (Mathis and Jackson 2003).</p> <p>The purpose of this article is to test the effects of internal marketing on job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Specifically, the aim of this research is to examine the effects of internal marketing on lecturers satisfaction and commitment. This article is organized as follows. First, the research questions are presented. Next, justifications for the research are provided. Then, the theoretical framework and hypotheses are presented. Research method is provided in the next section. This article concludes with a discussion of results, limitations of the study, and directions for future research. Research Questions Three research questions are considered in this study. 1. Does internal marketing positively impact on lecturers job satisfaction? 2. Does internal marketing positively impact on lecturers commitment toward their organization? 3. Does lecturers job satisfaction positively impact on organizational commitment? Justifications for the Research This research can be justified on these there grounds as follows: (1) the importance of internal marketing, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment, (2) the interdisciplinary approach to assess the relationship between internal marketing, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment, and (3) limited research of internal marketing in a university setting. The importance of internal marketing, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment. Successful marketing can be achieved if the firm is involved in external and internal marketing (Caruana and Calleya 1998). External marketing is marketing directed at people outside the company, whereas internal marketing is the task of hiring, training, and motivating able employees who want to serve customers (Kotler 2003). Internal marketing is important for organization. This is because the concept of internal marketing connected with other concepts such as job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Specifically, internal marketing has positive impact on employee job satisfaction (Hwang and Chi 2005). Internal marketing has also positive impact on organizational commitment (Caruana and Calleya 1998). It can be stated that researching and understanding the relationship between internal marketing, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment would support institutions of higher education. The institution can better understand factors that influence their employees commitment. These understanding would support their lecturers. The interdisciplinary approach to assess the relationship between internal marketing, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment. This research applies an interdisciplinary approach to examine the relationship between internal marketing, job satisfaction, and</p> <p>2</p> <p>organizational commitment. In the specific, the internal marketing concept is based on marketing field where job satisfaction and organizational commitment are based on organizational studies. The interdisciplinary research is a research which focus on understanding people behavior more comprehensively and it is a tool to improve social science research (Deshpande 1999; Murray and Evers 1989; Horton 1984). Limited internal marketing research in a university setting. Internal marketing is a critical issue facing marketing professions, HR managers, and executives in general (Pitt et al., 1999). This is because internal marketing expresses the relations between management and employees (Lee and Chen 2005). Despite internal marketing has been examined in management fields such as public sector (Ewing and Caruana 1999), life assurance (Ahmed and Rafiq 1995), international airlines (Frost and Kumar 2001) and manufacturer (Lee and Chen 2005; Piercy 1995), there is a gap exists in a university setting. Specifically, the lack of internal marketing research in a university setting triggers our curiosity. Since the aim of a university is to prepare students for the real world (Comm and Mathaisel 2003), a better understanding in internal marketing as one important factor that influence job satisfaction and organizational commitment is a must. Literature Review Internal marketing Internal marketing was originally derived from the notion of the employee are first market. The major point of the concept is ensured that employees feel that management cares about them and their needs (Ewing and Caruana 1999). Besides internal marketing emphasize s on employee are first, internal marketing also include several aspects (Schultz 2002; Gronroos 2000). First, internal marketing as an active, coordinated, and goal oriented approach to all employee-oriented efforts. Second, internal marketing emphasizes on the need to understand employee as people. In the specific, human resources manager in a firm should understand the people so they can motivate and satisfy the employee. In order to motivate and satisfy employee, firm should have marketing-like approach to the employee. In other words, a firm should threat employees as customers. Finally, internal marketing also includes the implementation of specific corporate or functional strategies. Foreman and Money (1995 cited by Preston-Broady and Steel 2002) observe that some researchers believe that internal marketing is synonym with human resources management (HRM) concept. On the other hand, other researchers (e.g., Gronroos 2000; Rafiq and Ahmed 2000; Ewing and Caruana 1999) support that the concept of internal marketing has much in common with HRM concept but they are not the same. In short, internal marketing emphasizes on the need to view people as internal customers. As internal customers, employees should be treated as the way firm treats customer.</p> <p>3</p> <p>Job satisfaction Organizational commitment and job satisfaction play important role in organization behavior variables which still challenging for further research (Brown and Gaylor 2002). Job satisfaction is one important factor that influences positive employee behavior (Arnett, Laurie, and McLane 2002). In other words, when individual is satisfied with his job, that individual feels more responsible and committed to the organization. Job satisfaction is defined as a positive emotional state resulting from evaluating ones job experiences (Mathis and Jackson 2003). Job satisfaction can be achieved when employees (1) enjoy their work (2) have a realistic opportunity about their career (3) like the people with whom they work (4) they like and respect their supervisor, and (5) believe their pay is fair. Organizational Commitment The concept of internal marketing is connected with the concept of organizational commitment (Jarvi 2000). Previous research about organizational commitment can be found in several areas such as governmental agency (Abbot, White, and Charles 2005; Coleman, Irving and Cooper 1999), higher education (Cetin 2006; Brown and Gaylor 2002), health industry (Samad 2006), services management (Beatson and Lings 2005), and engineers and technicians (Jaros 1995) Organizational commitment is defined as the degree to which employees believe in and accept organizational goals and desire to remain with the firm (Mathis and Jackson 2003, 75). Another definition of organizational commitment is ones own investment in an organization and inclining to attitudes resulting in social qualities (Balay 2000 cited by Cetin 2006) Organizational commitment has several different classifications (see Mowday, Porter, Steers 1982; Meyer and Allen 1991). However the most widely used classification are Meyer and Allens (1991) classification. Meyer and Allen classified organizational commitment into three components of commitment: continuance, normative, and affective commitment. Continuance commitment involves profit associated with continued participation and a cost associated with leaving. Normative commitment, on the other hand, is the internalized normative pressure to act in a way which meets organizational goals and interests. Then, affective commitment is described as the relative strength of an individuals identification with and involvement in a particular organization. Hypotheses and the Research Model Three hypotheses are developed based on the literature review above: 1. Internal marketing will be positively related to job satisfaction. 2. Internal marketing will be positively related to organizational commitment. 3. Job satisfaction will be positively related to organizational commitment.</p> <p>4</p> <p>Figure 1. The Research Model</p> <p>Job Satisfaction H1</p> <p>Internal Marketing</p> <p>H3</p> <p>H2</p> <p>Organizational Commitment</p> <p>Source: developed for this research</p> <p>Research method Data collection There were two stages in this research. The first stage was a pilot research to examine reliability and validity instrument. The second stage was the actual research. The data for this research was obtained through self-administered questionnaire from lecturers in a private university in West Java. The design sampling for this research was a purposive sampling. There were two main concerns for respondents: (1) respondents should be a lecturer and (2) respondents should at least have worked one year in the university. This research applied two-step process to obtain a good response rate. First, researchers brought questionnaires to all faculties. In each faculty, researchers met respondents (i.e., lecturers) and informed them about the survey. When possible, researchers tried to give questionnaires to lecturers directly. However, when researchers could not meet lecturers directly, then researchers left questionnaires to the administration staff of each faculty so s (he) can give questionnaires to lecturers whom researchers could not meet. Second, we contacted those respondents in 3 to 14 days in order to obtain questionnaires. Researchers also contacted the staff administration to collect the questionnaires. However, the questionnaire survey took a month to be collected.</p> <p>5</p> <p>The anonymity of the respondents was considered in this research. The questionnaires were assured the anonymity of the respondents. In order to obtain good response rate, this all questionnaires were also provided with a gift from researchers. Research Instrument Existing constructs with multiple-items from previous internal marketing, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment studies were employed and modified based on the results of the pilot study. Internal marketing was adopted from Money and Foreman (1996 cited by Caruana and Calleya 1998). Following Money and Foreman, development and reward were dimensions of internal marketing construct. Job satisfaction was adopted from Spector (1999). Organizational commitment was adopted from Allen and Meyer (1990). All variables will be measured by a 5-point Likert-scale. Pilot study There were two main objectives in conducting pilot study in this research. First, the pilot test was aimed to assess reliability and validity the instrument (Matsuno and Mentzer 2000). Second, pilot study was used to reduce the number of items used in this research to a more manageable number (Matsuno and Mentzer 2000). In the specific, the original items in the questionnaire were 77 items. Therefore, there is a need to reduce those items to become easily understable and theoretically relevant items (Kellor and Hult 1999). A relatively short questionnaire also can be easily administered to respondents (Kohli, Jaworski, and Kumar 1993). Following Ahmed, Rafiq and Saad (2003), items in the questionnaire were deleted when the corrected item-total correlation was below 0.30. Then, item-total statistics were again computed to achieve value greater than 0.3. The result produced that original items of 77 items were reduced to 36 items. Reliability and validity of the measures. The goodness of measures in this research was assessed through reliability and validity. Reliability is defined as the consistency and stability of a score from a measurement scale (Davis, 2005). Reliability was measured by applying several tests: the Cronbachs alpha and average variance extracted (AVE). The cut-off point 0.7 (Hair, Black, Babin, Anderson...</p>