the effect of grinding on grinding wheel condition - michigan
TRANSCRIPT
The Effect of Grinding on Grinding Wheel Condition
Prasann B. Handigund, Melissa HasenbankMichele H. Miller
Michigan Technological UniversityHoughton, MI
Introduction
Grinding Wheel Grinding Process
Abrasive wear
Abrasive pull-out
Wheel diameter shrinksChip accumulation
Surface finish
Dimensional accuracyGrinding force
Temperature
Wheel Wear and Self-Dressing
Wear Modes:-Attritious wear-Grit fracture-Bond fracture and grit pullout
Self-Dressing:-Attritious wear leads to force increase-With sufficient force, grit fractures or pulls out-Grit cutting forces can be controlled by selection of grit type and binder
ZX
top view
cup grinding wheel
workpiece
piezoelectric actuator
air bearing spindle
3 axis force transducer
Self-Dressing Test Setup
Effect of Infeed(Experimental Data)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0 50 100 150 200 250
Volume of Material Removed (mm3)
Cut
ting
Forc
e (N
)
infeed=10 nm
infeed=20 nm
infeed=40 nm
wheel 1
workpiece: silicon carbide
Effect of Workpiece Material(Experimental Data)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0 50 100 150 200 250
Material Removed (mm3)
Cu
ttin
g F
orc
e (
N)
Silicon Carbide
Pyrex glass
wheel 1
infeed = 40 nm
Effect of Wheel Composition(Experimental Data)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0 50 100 150 200 250
Volume of Material Removed (mm3)
Cu
ttin
g F
orc
e (N
)
Wheel 1
Wheel 2
workpiece: silicon carbide
infeed = 40 nm
Matching Wheel to Workpiece
Time
Cut
ting
For
ce
wheel 1
wheel 2
wheel 3
Specific EnergyW
heel
Wea
r R
ate
1
2
3
Goal: Predict the these plots based on wheel properties and operating conditions
Purpose of Developing a Model
• Based on desired wear and energy, use model to select suitable wheel properties and operating conditions
• Exercise model to find ways to improve on the wear/energy tradeoff
Elements of Model
• Cutting force model– Dependence on work material, chip thickness, grit
shape, chip clearance, etc.– Focus on components that change as wheel
“wears”
• Wear model– Abrasive wear due to attrition and fracture– Binder wear– Abrasive pullout/binder fracture
First Steps
• Develop and validate technique for grit wear measurement
• Determine dependence of grit wear rate on normal force, cutting speed, abrasive material, …
• Determine dependence of grit cutting force on wear flat area, chip thickness, work material, …
• Determine grit force that causes grit fracture or pullout
Grit Wear Measurement Technique-Obtaining Imprint
Grit Wear Measurement Technique-Measuring Volume
Comparison to ProfilometryProfilometry-Nominal Feed:0.3 mm
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 500 1000 1500 2000
Scan Direction (µm)
Z (
µm)
SEM-Specimen-Nominal Feed:0.3mm
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 200 400 600 800 1000Scan Direction (µm )
Z (µ
m)
SEM-Mold-Nominal Feed:0.3 mm
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Scan Direction ( µm)
Z (
µm)
Rmax (µm) f (mm)
Profilometry 32 0.448
SEM Specimen 37 0.462
SEM Mold 1 46 0.530
SEM Mold 2 39 0.500
Rmax (µm) f (mm)
Profilometry 105 0.639
SEM Specimen 118.8 0.638
SEM Mold 1 123 0.660
SEM Mold 2 122 0.650
Test Rod 1
Test Rod 2
Profilometry on Rod
Stereo SEM on Rod
Stereo SEM on Mold
Accuracy and Repeatability
Test 1: Mold anode of a battery (in which volume is known) and measure volume of mold cavity
Test 2: Make two molds of wheel and measure volume of same grit on each
Test 3: Measure volume of one molded grit repeatedly (5 times)
Object vol = 13.16 mm3
Mold vol = 13.65 mm3
% Variation = 3.7
Mold 1 = 129,400 µm3
Mold 2 = 138,800 µm3
% Variation = 7.3
min = 665.3 µm3
max = 682.9 µm3
% Variation = 2.6
Surface Grinding Experiment
Mobilmet 160 water-basedCoolant
2.5 umWheel depth of cut
75 mm/sTable speed
15.42 m/sWheel speed
Electroplated diamond (1A1), 100 mm dia. x 12.5 mm with 25 mm x 12.5 mm abrasive patch180 grit size (2)100 grit size (1)
Grinding wheels
Ceradyne Ceraloy 146-S5Workpiece material
Every 40 passesWear flat and grit pullout measurement frequency
Every 20 passesForce measurement frequency
Every 20 passesMold preparation frequency
3M Express light body fast setMold material
Estimating Number of Cutting Grits, Grit Pullouts, and Total Number of Grits
Total Number of Grits
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Pass #
Nu
mb
er o
f Gri
ts
Wheel 1
Wheel 2
Wheel 3
Total number of grits = number of wear flats+number of non-cutting grits+number of pullouts
Total area = 25 mm x 12.5 mm
% Cutting Grits
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Pass #
% C
utt
ing
Gri
ts
Wheel 1
Wheel 2Wheel 3
% cutting grits = (number of wear flats)/(number of grits on new wheel)
% of Grits Pulled Out
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Pass #
% G
rits
Los
t
Wheel 1
Wheel 2
Wheel 3
% grits lost = (number of pullouts)/(number of grits on new wheel)
Normal Force/Cutting Grit
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
0 100 200 300 400 500 600Pass #
Forc
e (N
)
Wheel 1
Wheel 2
Wheel 3
Steps to get this plot: a) measure normal force at regular intervals; b) remove wheel at regular intervals and count wear flats; c) divide the two
Tangential Force/Cutting Grit
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0 100 200 300 400 500 600Pass #
Forc
e (N
)
Wheel 1
Wheel 2
Wheel 3
Steps to get this plot: a) measure tangential force at regular intervals; b) remove wheel at regular intervals and count wear flats; c) divide the two
Exposed Grit Volumes
Wheel 2
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
800,000
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Pass #
Vo
lum
e (
µm
3 )
Wheel 3
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
800,000
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Pass #
Vol
ume
( µm
3 )
Wheel 1
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
800,000
0 100 200 300 400 500 600Pass #
Vo
lum
e (
m3 )
Observations
• For small grit wheels, the % cutting grits decreases with time due to large number of grit pullouts.
• For large grit wheel, the % cutting grits increases with time due to flattening of outermost grits.
• Forces for large grit wheel are larger than for small grit wheel—higher grit wear rates expected.
• Grit volume wear rates are higher for large grit wheels.
• Larger grits sustain more wear before falling out.
Review of Progress
Grit Wear Measurement: Mold/Stereo SEM technique is accurate and repeatable.
Normal Force/Grit Wear Rate Relationship: Can be found with force measurement, wear flat count and SEM volume measurement.
Wear Flat Area/Cutting Force Relationship: Need wear flat area measurement.
Pullout Force: Rough estimate is possible based on average grit forces, but need force distribution.
Wheel Loading Investigation
• Many factors: workpiece material, wheel, feeds/speeds, coolant usage, …
• Look at relationship between chip size and chip clearance
• Test potential solutions: vibration assistance, high pressure coolant
Geometrical View
Feed Speed
Chi
p th
ickn
ess(
or c
hip
leng
th?)
Depth of cut = …Wheel rpm = …Wheel dia. = …Grit size = …Grit concentration = …
Average space between grits L
oadi
ng r
ate
Does (chip size)/(chip clearance) predict rate of chip accumulation?
Test Setup
58% black
Image Analysis
Effect of Wheel Hardness
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
# of Passes
% B
lack
Wheel 4 (80/H)Wheel 2 (80/J)Wheel 5 (80/K)
Effect of Grit Size
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
# of Passes
% B
lack
Wheel 1 (60/J)Wheel 2 (80/J)Wheel 3 (100/J)
Alumina Wheels Grinding Steel
Surface grindingTable speed = 50 mm/secDepth of cut = 25 µm
Each data point represents the average of 3 pictures
Metal MEMS Mirror Arrays
El ectrostatical lyActuated Dia phragm
Attachment Post
Mirror Segment
CMOS Elec tronics
16 µm
0.93 µm
1.72 µm
9 µm
Planarization Process
Polishing pad
CMOS Die
Dummy pieces for balancing
Polishing pad Polished Silicon Nitride Over CMOS
-0.20.00.20.40.60.81.0
0 200 400 600 800
Scan Direction (µ m)
He
igh
t (
m)
CMOS Surface Before Planarization
-0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0 200 400 600 800
Scan Direction (µm)
Hei
gh
t (
m)