the effect of a trained attending response on rate of acquisition in canines kevin schlichenmeyer,...

1
The Effect of a Trained Attending Response on Rate of Acquisition in Canines Kevin Schlichenmeyer, Jeffrey Miller, & Daniel D. Holt Psychology Department, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire Introduction Methods Discussion Results Centuries of anecdotal reports from dog trainers have reported that providing a reward contingent on behavior will increase that behavior : 1751- “If he fails to follow the scent he is beaten, but if he does well he is caressed and rewarded.” 1814- “Obedience is rewarded by caressing, while the contrary is punished with the whip.” 1999- “If you call a puppy, and it comes, and you pet it, the pups’ coming will become more and more reliable.” Established dog trainers have used anecdotal evidence to make the claim that the training of an attending response is crucial for effective teaching. Although there is empirical support from human studies on the importance of trained attending (Fox, 1977) there is no research in the animal training literature to confirm these findings. The present study assessed the effect of a trained attending response on rate of acquisition in canines. Canines housed at the Eau Claire County Humane Association were selected for the study if they did not appear to have aggressive tendencies, did not have the skill of sitting on command, and did not respond to name when called. Canines were randomly assigned to either an experimental or a control group. The canines in the experimental group were first trained an attending response, while canines in the control group were on a leash for the same amount of time that it took to train the attending response to mastery. When trained attending was mastered, canines in both the experimental and control group were trained to sit. Trainers began sessions by prompting the first 5 trials and then probing the next trial. If a correct response occurred during a probe trial, then trainers would deliver sit commands without prompting the correct response. If an error occurred trainers returned to prompting 5 trials then probing the sixth. When canines engaged in ten independent correct responses for two consecutive sessions the skill was considered mastered. Treatment integrity was 100% for all sessions. Inter- rater reliability was taken for 20% of sessions and was 100%. The present study set out to assess the effect of a trained attending response on rate of acquisition of a sit skill. The data suggest that training an attending response facilitates rate of acquisition of the sit skill. Although both canines experienced the same amount of handling, a rapport confound can not be completely eliminated. Canines in the experimental group were reinforced contingent on correct responses during attending training, while canines in the control group were not reinforced. Future research on attending may alleviate the potential rapport confound by delivering the same number reinforcers to canines in the control group on a random time schedule. The experimental canine met the mastery criterion for sit after 3 treatment sessions. The control canine met the mastery criterion for sit after 7 experimental sessions. Forty sit trials were delivered for the experimental canine, while 127 trials were delivered for the control canine. Acknowledgements This research project was supported by the Office of Research and Sponsored Programs. We thank Erin Barney and Kristine Funk for their assistance with data collection and input on the general design of the study. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Percentage Correct Sessions Control canine Bsl Tx 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 P e rce n tage C o re ct Sessions Experim ental canine Bsl Tx 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 Experim ental Control Num ber of TrialsDelivered Condition SitTrials Prompt Behavior 5 times Prompt Behavior 5 times (Use minimal prompting level necessary to elicit behavior) Probe for Acquisition (Deliver only SD) Correct Error Deliver SD Correct Error SR+= 1-2- 3 1-2- 3 1-2- 3 1-2- 3 1-2- 3 1-2- 3 1-2- 3 1-2- 3 1-2- 3 1-2- 3 1-2- 3 1-2- 3 1-2- 3 1-2- 3 1-2- 3 1-2- 3 1-2- 3 1-2- 3 1-2- 3 1-2- 3 Circle: Trial #: A flow chart of the procedure is provided on the left. A photo of a canine learning the skill of sit is provided on the right.

Upload: rose-sherman

Post on 21-Jan-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Effect of a Trained Attending Response on Rate of Acquisition in Canines Kevin Schlichenmeyer, Jeffrey Miller, & Daniel D. Holt Psychology Department,

The Effect of a Trained Attending Response on Rate of Acquisition in Canines

Kevin Schlichenmeyer, Jeffrey Miller, & Daniel D. Holt Psychology Department, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire

Introduction

Methods

Discussion

Results

Centuries of anecdotal reports from dog trainers have reported that providing a reward contingent on behavior will increase that behavior : 1751- “If he fails to follow the scent he is beaten, but if he does well he is caressed and rewarded.” 1814- “Obedience is rewarded by caressing, while the contrary is punished with the whip.” 1999- “If you call a puppy, and it comes, and you pet it, the pups’ coming will become more and more reliable.”

Established dog trainers have used anecdotal evidence to make the claim that the training of an attending response is crucial for effective teaching. Although there is empirical support from human studies on the importance of trained attending (Fox, 1977) there is no research in the animal training literature to confirm these findings.

The present study assessed the effect of a trained attending response on rate of acquisition in canines.

Canines housed at the Eau Claire County Humane Association were selected for the study if they did not appear to have aggressive tendencies, did not have the skill of sitting on command, and did not respond to name when called.

Canines were randomly assigned to either an experimental or a control group. The canines in the experimental group were first trained an attending response, while canines in the control group were on a leash for the same amount of time that it took to train the attending response to mastery. When trained attending was mastered, canines in both the experimental and control group were trained to sit.

Trainers began sessions by prompting the first 5 trials and then probing the next trial. If a correct response occurred during a probe trial, then trainers would deliver sit commands without prompting the correct response. If an error occurred trainers returned to prompting 5 trials then probing the sixth.

When canines engaged in ten independent correct responses for two consecutive sessions the skill was considered mastered.

Treatment integrity was 100% for all sessions. Inter-rater reliability was taken for 20% of sessions and was 100%.

The present study set out to assess the effect of a trained attending response on rate of acquisition of a sit skill. The data suggest that training an attending response facilitates rate of acquisition of the sit skill.

Although both canines experienced the same amount of handling, a rapport confound can not be completely eliminated. Canines in the experimental group were reinforced contingent on correct responses during attending training, while canines in the control group were not reinforced.

Future research on attending may alleviate the potential rapport confound by delivering the same number reinforcers to canines in the control group on a random time schedule.

The experimental canine met the mastery criterion for sit after 3 treatment sessions.

The control canine met the mastery criterion for sit after 7 experimental sessions.

Forty sit trials were delivered for the experimental canine, while 127 trials were delivered for the control canine.

Acknowledgements

This research project was supported by the Office of Research and Sponsored Programs. We thank Erin Barney and Kristine Funk for their assistance with data collection and input on the general design of the study.

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Pe

rce

nta

ge C

orr

ect

Sessions

Control canine

Bsl Tx

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Pe

rce

nta

ge

Co

rect

Sessions

Experimental canine

Bsl Tx

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

130

Experimental Control

Num

ber o

f Tria

ls D

eliv

ered

Condition

Sit Trials

Prompt Behavior 5 timesPrompt Behavior 5 times(Use minimal prompting level necessary to elicit behavior)

Probe for Acquisition

(Deliver only SD)

Correct Error

Deliver SD

Correct Error

SR+=

1-2-3 1-2-3 1-2-3 1-2-3 1-2-3 1-2-31-2-3 1-2-3 1-2-3 1-2-3 1-2-3 1-2-31-2-31-2-31-2-31-2-3 1-2-31-2-31-2-31-2-3Circle:

Trial #:

A flow chart of the procedure is provided on the left. A photo of a canine learning the skill of sit is provided on the right.