the educational attainment phenotype matt mcgue department of psychology university of minnesota...
TRANSCRIPT
The educational attainment phenotype
Matt McGueDepartment of Psychology
University of Minnesota
Human Capital and Economic Opportunity Global Working GroupUniversity of Chicago
18.04.2014
FatherMother
Offspring #1
Offspring #2
Initially Assessed in Adolescence
Offspring Types:Monozygotic (MZ) TwinsDizygotic (DZ) TwinsBiological SiblingsAdopted Siblings
MCTFR: Sampling unit
The educational attainment phenotype:
• Aggregates strongly in families for environmental as well as genetic reasons
• With intergenerational mobility associated with gender, cohort and hard and soft skills
• Environmental transmission within families may not be due skill building
College graduation patterns in MTFS both typical and atypical of the US
Women Men
Parent Generation 25.4%(N=1372)
27.7%(N=1369)
Offspring Generation 50.7%(N=1283)
35.5%(N=1121)
Based on census data analyzed by Population Reference Bureauhttp://www.prb.org/Publications/Articles/2011/gender-gap-in-education.aspx
. . . and educational attainment aggregates strongly in families
MZ DZ Mother-Offspring
Father-Offspring
Mother-Father
Correlation .83(.78, .88)
.73(.63, .81)
.46(.40, .51)
.50(.45, .56)
.69(.63, .74)
. . . due to both genetic and shared environmental factors
Source DescriptionPercentage
variance accounted for
Additive Genetic Heritability 33%
Shared Environment Environmental factors that differ among families 39%
Non-shared Environment
Environmental factors that distinguish among relatives in the
same family17%
Gene-environment Covariance
Correlation between additive genetic and shared environmental
factors12%
The educational attainment phenotype:
• Aggregates strongly in families for environmental as well as genetic reasons
• With intergenerational mobility associated with gender, cohort and hard and soft skills
• Environmental transmission within families may not be due skill building
Individual-level predictors of offspring academic success
Age-17 Predictor Description
HardSkill
General Cognitive Ability (GCA)
4 Weschler subtests: Vocabulary & Information Block Design & Picture Arrangement
SoftSkills
Academic Motivation (rated by parent)
Sample Items: Is motivated to earn good grades Turns in homework on time
Positive EmotionalityMPQ Primary Scales: Well Being, Social Closeness Achievement & Social Potency
Negative EmotionalityMPQ Primary Scales: Aggression, Alienation & Stress Reactivity
Control MPQ Control scale
Externalizing Sum of symptoms of: Antisocial behavior & substance abuse
All are associated with college graduation
Unadjusted OR
General Cognitive Ability
2.02(1.83, 2.22)
Academic Motivation 2.50(2.23, 2.80)
Positive Emotionality 1.42(1.29, 1.56)
Negative Emotionality 0.73(0.67, 0.80)
Control 1.83(1.67, 2.01)
Externalizing 0.54(0.50, 0.60)
Sex 1.84(1.52, 2.22)
. . . even when adjusting for all other factors
Unadjusted OR Adjusted OR
General Cognitive Ability
2.02(1.83, 2.22)
1.75(1.55, 1.97)
Academic Motivation 2.50(2.23, 2.80)
2.02(1.76, 2.01)
Positive Emotionality 1.42(1.29, 1.56)
1.21(1.08, 1.37)
Negative Emotionality 0.73(0.67, 0.80)
0.85(0.76, 0.96)
Control 1.83(1.67, 2.01)
1.22(1.07, 1.38)
Externalizing 0.54(0.50, 0.60)
0.82(0.72, 0.93)
Sex 1.84(1.52, 2.22)
1.53(1.21, 1.93)
Educational mobility in the MTFS
OffspringGender
Stability Change
Non-College College Upward Mobility
Downward Mobility
Women(N=1289) 39.3% 28.7% 22.1% 10.0%
Men (N=1117) 46.5% 20.5% 15.1% 17.9%
Intergenerational mobility associated with: cognitive ability, externalizing & control
The educational attainment phenotype:
• Aggregates strongly in families for environmental as well as genetic reasons
• With intergenerational mobility associated with gender, cohort and hard and soft skills
• Environmental transmission within families may not be due skill building
College educated parents are more likely to have college educated offspring, in both adoptive and biological families
But adoptive parents effect doesn’t appear to be attributable to skill building
. . . but adoptive family income really helps
Conclusions
• Unlike many behavioral genetic traits, there may be strong shared environmental influences on social achievements
• Intergenerational mobility is driven by hard and soft skill differentials
• Yet the family environmental influences may more reflect opportunities created by socioeconomic advantage than skill building
Thank You!