the economic benefits of public infrastructure … · the economic benefits of public...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE … · The Economic Benefits of Public Infrastructure Spending in British Columbia 1 Executive Summary There is a broad consensus that](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022053009/5f0c70ad7e708231d4356947/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
THEECONOMICBENEFITSOFPUBLICINFRASTRUCTURESPENDINGINBRITISHCOLUMBIA
Preparedfor:
BroadbentInstituteStationB,POBox1273Ottawa,ONK1P5R3
Preparedby:
TheCentreforSpatialEconomics336BronteStreetSouth,Unit221Milton,ONL9T7W6
March2017
![Page 2: THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE … · The Economic Benefits of Public Infrastructure Spending in British Columbia 1 Executive Summary There is a broad consensus that](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022053009/5f0c70ad7e708231d4356947/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
TableofContentsExecutiveSummary......................................................................................................................................1
BritishColumbia'sInfrastructureSpendingOptions....................................................................................3
EconomicTheory:LinkingPublicInfrastructureandEconomicPerformance.........................................3
MethodologyandAssumptions...................................................................................................................6
AScenario-basedApproachtoModelingUncertainty.............................................................................6
Results:TotalEconomicImpact...................................................................................................................8
EconomicMultipliersandReturnonInvestment...................................................................................10
Short-runMultipliers..........................................................................................................................10
Long-runReturnonInvestment.........................................................................................................11
SummaryandObservations.......................................................................................................................13
References..................................................................................................................................................15
AppendixA:ContributionofPublicCapitalattheIndustryLevel..............................................................16
AppendixB:C4SEProvincialEconomicModelingSystem..........................................................................18
AppendixC:SectoralImpacts.....................................................................................................................20
![Page 3: THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE … · The Economic Benefits of Public Infrastructure Spending in British Columbia 1 Executive Summary There is a broad consensus that](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022053009/5f0c70ad7e708231d4356947/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
AboutthisStudy
ThisreportwaspreparedforTheBroadbentInstitutebyTheCenterforSpatialEconomics.TheBroadbentInstituteisanindependent,non-partisanorganizationchampioningprogressivechangethroughthepromotionofdemocracy,equality,andsustainabilityandthetrainingofanewgenerationofleaders.Formoreinformation,pleaseseewww.broadbentinstitute.ca.
TheanalysisestimatestheeconomicbenefitsofpublicinfrastructurespendinginBritishColumbiausingtheC4SE’sprovincialeconomicmodelingsystem.Resultsarepresentedintermsoftheplan’simpactsuponGDP,employment,governmentrevenuesanddeficitsovertime.SpendingmultipliersandreturnoninvestmentstatisticsaregeneratedtoprovidesummarymeasuresofthebenefitstoBritishColumbiaresidentsandtaxpayers.Theresultsdemonstratethebenefitsofpublicfundingforinfrastructurewherepubliccapitalcanplayanimportantroleincontributingtoinvestment-ledeconomicexpansions,andimprovingtheproductivityandcompetitivenessofprivatebusinessesinBritishColumbia.
ThereportwasconductedbyRobinSomerville,Director,oftheCentreforSpatialEconomics(C4SE).TheC4SEmonitors,analyzesandforecastseconomicanddemographicchangethroughoutCanadaatvirtuallyalllevelsofgeography.Italsopreparescustomizedstudiesontheeconomic,industrialandcommunityimpactsofvariousfiscalandotherpolicychanges,anddevelopscustomizedimpactandprojectionmodelsforin-houseclientuse.TheC4SEprovideseconomicmodels,analysisandforecaststonineprovincialandterritorialgovernmentsacrossCanada.Formoreinformationpleasegotowww.c4se.com.
![Page 4: THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE … · The Economic Benefits of Public Infrastructure Spending in British Columbia 1 Executive Summary There is a broad consensus that](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022053009/5f0c70ad7e708231d4356947/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
TheEconomicBenefitsofPublicInfrastructureSpendinginBritishColumbia
1
ExecutiveSummary
ThereisabroadconsensusthatCanada’spublicinfrastructurehasdeterioratedoverthelastfewdecades.Issueswithtrafficcongestion,inadequatepublictransportation,sewercollapseandsinkholesregularlymakemediaheadlinesandhavegonefrombeinginconvenienttoaseriousimpedimenttoeconomicactivity.TheBroadbentInstituteisencouragingalllevelsofgovernmentsacrossthecountrytofocusondevelopingthecountry'sinfrastructure.
ThisreportexaminestheeconomicbenefitsofthreepossiblepublicinfrastructurespendingplansinBritishColumbia.Thethreeplansinvolve5-yearcumulativespendingcommitmentsbytheprovincialgovernmentof$5,$7and$10billionrespectively.Thebenefitsfromapublicinfrastructureprogramarisefromthedirectprogramspendingbutthenextendbeyondthisdirectimpact.Publiccapitalpromoteslong-termeconomicgrowthandproductivityasproductivepublicinfrastructurereducescostsforprivatebusinessesprovidingacompellingcaseforpublicfundingofthiscapital.
Thebenefitsofapublicinfrastructurespendingprogramincludethefollowing:
o Intheshort-run,GDPrises$1.78perdollarofspending,9.6jobsaregeneratedpermilliondollarsspentand$0.29ofeachdollarspentbygovernmentisrecoveredinadditionalprovincialtaxrevenue
o Overthelong-term,thediscountedpresentvalueofGDPgeneratedperdollarofpublicinfrastructurespending(ROI)liesbetween$1.42and$2.09
o Privatesectorinvestmentriseso Businessesaremoreproductiveandcompetitiveininternationalmarketso Realwagesrise,providingahigherstandardofliving
Table1
Productivepublicinfrastructurereducescostsforprivatebusinesses–boostingGDPbyupto$2.09perdollarspent–sothatacompellingcasecanbemadeforpublicfundingofthiscapital.TheC4SEbelievesthatthefullbenefitscaseresults,basedonthecost-savingsbenefitstoprivatebusinessestimatedbyHarchaouiandTarkhani(2003),arecredibleandrepresentthebenefitsthatshouldaccruefromspendingonpublicinfrastructure.Butthereisariskthatalargeinfrastructureprogramcouldyieldlowerbenefitssothatthehalfbenefitscaseprovidesaprudentlower-boundtotheanalysis.
TheC4SEcautionsagainstviewingpublicinfrastructurespendingastooltocounterthebusinesscycle.
HalfBenefits
FullBenefits
GDPper$ofspending 1.78 1.42 2.09Non-Residentialinvestmentper$ofspending 1.35 0.84 1.04Jobsper$millionofspending 9.6 1.1 1.1BCGov'ttaxrevenueper$ofspending 0.29 0.14 0.19
BritishColumbiaPublicInfrastructureSpending:SummaryofBenefitsLong-runReturnon
InvestmentImpactperdollarofpublicinfrastructurespending
Short-runTotalImpact
Multiplier
![Page 5: THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE … · The Economic Benefits of Public Infrastructure Spending in British Columbia 1 Executive Summary There is a broad consensus that](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022053009/5f0c70ad7e708231d4356947/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
TheEconomicBenefitsofPublicInfrastructureSpendinginBritishColumbia
2
Publicinfrastructurefundingdecisionsshouldbebasedonlong-termbenefitsandavoidfundingprojectsthatyieldlesslong-termutilitytotheeconomysoastoensurethatthespendingdoesnotyieldreducedlong-termbenefitstooutputoremploymentwhilesaddlingtheeconomywithadditionaldebt.
StudyMethodology
TheanalysisconsistsofsevenscenarioswhichwereconductedusingtheC4SE’sprovincialeconomicmodelingsystemwhichisamulti-region,multi-sector,dynamicstochasticgeneralequilibriummodelofCanadaanditsprovinces.Thebaselinescenariodoesnotincludeanyadditionalpublicinfrastructurespendingandisthebenchmarkagainstwhicheachoftheotherscenariosiscompared.Thethreeothersetsofscenariosreflectchangesineconomicactivityarisingfromthepublicinfrastructurespendingprogram.Eachsetofscenariosisconstructedforcumulative5-yearspendingprogramsof$5,$7and$10billion.Thelong-termimpactsfromthehalfandfullbenefitscasescenariosassumerespectivelythatthenewpublicinfrastructureprovideseitherhalforallofthecost-savingsbenefitstoprivatebusinessestimatedbytheresearchofHarchaouiandTarkhani(2003).
TheincreaseinpubliccapitalcanalsohelpachievesomethingelsethathaseludedpolicymakersinCanadaandBritishColumbiaoverthelastfewyears:gainsinprivatesectorinvestmentspending.Apublicinfrastructureprogramboostsprivateinvestmentinboththenearandlong-termandcan,therefore,playanimportantroleincontributingtoaninvestment-ledeconomicexpansion.
Thereadershouldnotethat,likeotherreports,thisstudyonlyconsiderssomeofthepossiblebenefitsfromspendingonpublicinfrastructure.Thebenefitsarelimitedtothosefromtheactualordirectspendingandthelong-termbenefitstobusinessintermsofreducedcostsfromthepubliccapital.Butpublicspendingontheseassetsisalsorequiredtoachieveothersocialobjectivesthathavenotbeencapturedorquantifiedinthisanalysis.Thesebenefitsincludethosetohouseholdsfromlowertransportationcongestioncosts,improvedbusinessnetworkingopportunities,reductionsinpollutionandgreenhousegases,andsocietalgainsfromeducation,healthcareandotherpublicassets.
Inclosing,thisstudyalsoprovidesacautionarytaleforpolicyanalysts.Thecostsofneglectingourpublicinfrastructurearenotzero.AsnotedbyInfrastructureCanada,allowingourpublicinfrastructuretocontinuetodecayimposescostsofatleastequalbutoppositeconsequencetothebenefitsestimatedinthisstudy.ThecompetitivenessofprivatebusinessesinBritishColumbia(2011)aretiedtothequalityofpublicassetssoasignificantandsustainedpublicinfrastructurespendinginitiativeisrequiredifhouseholdsandbusinessesaretocontinuetoenjoyahighstandardofliving.
![Page 6: THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE … · The Economic Benefits of Public Infrastructure Spending in British Columbia 1 Executive Summary There is a broad consensus that](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022053009/5f0c70ad7e708231d4356947/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
TheEconomicBenefitsofPublicInfrastructureSpendinginBritishColumbia
3
BritishColumbia'sInfrastructureSpendingOptions
ThereisabroadconsensusthatCanada’spublicinfrastructurehasdeterioratedoverthelastfewdecades.Issueswithtrafficcongestion,inadequatepublictransportation,sewercollapseandsinkholesregularlymakemediaheadlinesandhavegonefrombeinginconvenienttoaseriousimpedimenttoeconomicactivity.Manygovernmentsacrossthecountryarenowcommittedtoaddressingissueswithpublicinfrastructurewithincreasedspendingtoexpand,replaceorrepairpublicassets.
LemireandGaudreault(2006)estimatedthatin2003Canada'sroadandhighwaynetworkhadover50percentofitsusefullifebehinditwhilefederalandprovincialbridgeshadpassedthehalfwaymarkoftheirusefullife.Municipalbridgesfaredalittlebetterwith41percentoftheirusefullivesbehindthem.Morerecently,GuyFélio(2012)preparedareportfortheFederationofCanadianMunicipalitieswhichestimatedthereplacementcostofmunicipalinfrastructureassetsthatwereratedbetween"fair"and"verypoor"tobe$171.8billionin2010.Federalandprovincialgovernmentshaveincludedspendinginitiativesinrecentbudgetsbut,after25yearsofunderinvestment,thespendingrequiredtocorrecttheissuewillrequiresignificantlymoreresourcesandsustainedcommitmentbyalllevelsofgovernment.
TheBroadbentInstituteisencouragingalllevelsofgovernmentsacrossthecountrytomaintainthisfocusondevelopingthenation'sinfrastructure(CentreforSpatialEconomics,2015).ThisreportexaminestheeconomicbenefitsofthreepossiblepublicinfrastructurespendingplansinBritishColumbia.Thethreeplansinvolve5-yearcumulativespendingcommitmentsbytheprovincialgovernmentof$5,$7and$10billionrespectively.
WhileitisexpectedthatthisspendingwillimprovethequalityoflifeinBritishColumbia–forexamplebyreducingtrafficcongestion,greenhousegasemissions,orreducingroadclosuresandpropertydamagefrominfrastructurefailure–itisalsoimportanttounderstandtheeconomicandfiscalconsequencesofthisspending.ThisstudyusestheC4SE’sprovincialeconomicmodelingsystemtoprovideanassessmentofthenear-termandlong-runeconomicandfiscalimpactsofthisspending.
EconomicTheory:LinkingPublicInfrastructureandEconomicPerformance
Economicstudiesoverthelasttwenty-fiveyearshaveconsistentlyfoundapositivelinkbetweenpublicinfrastructureandproductivity.Whiletherearemanycriticsofpublicspending,withmediareportsoftencitingexamplesofpublicinfrastructureprojectsthatprovidelittleornobenefittobusinessortothepublic,theseexamplesaretheexception.
Publiccapital,consistingofroads,bridges,sewersystemsandwatertreatmentfacilitiesamongotherpublicinfrastructureassets,constitutesavitalinputforprivatesectorproduction.Nonetheless,itsimpactonbusinesssectorproductivitygrowthortotaleconomygrossdomesticproduct(GDP)isdifficulttomeasure.PubliccapitalinNorthAmericatendstobepubliclyownedsonomarketsexistforitsoutput.Therearenoclosesubstitutesforpubliccapitalintheprivatesector,thusmakingitinfeasibletouseprivatesectorinformationasaproxyforthepublicsector.Asaresult,estimatesofpubliccapital’simpactarenoteasilyobtained.
![Page 7: THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE … · The Economic Benefits of Public Infrastructure Spending in British Columbia 1 Executive Summary There is a broad consensus that](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022053009/5f0c70ad7e708231d4356947/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
TheEconomicBenefitsofPublicInfrastructureSpendinginBritishColumbia
4
In1989DavidAschauer(1989)usedproductionfunctionestimatestoigniteadebateabouttheroleofpubliccapitalinprivateproduction,anditsroleintheproductivityslowdownintheUnitedStatesduringthe1970s.Wylie(1996)adoptedtheapproachtakenbyAschauertoestimatetheelasticityofpubliccapitalinCanada.Usingaproductionfunction,andCanadianaggregatedatafrom1946to1991,hefindsthatgovernmentcapitalhasapositiveelasticity.HeconcludesbyarguingthathisresultssupportthefindingfortheUnitedStatesthatpubliccapitalplaysanimportantroleinbusinesssectoroutputandproductivitygrowth.Foravarietyofreasons,therehavebeenmanycriticsoftheseeconometricstudies.Forexample,thecriticismsrangefromfailingtoaccountfornon-stationarityinthedata,toomittedvariablebiasandsimultaneitybias.Inadditionthemagnitudesofthecoefficientestimates–thebenefits–areimprobablylarge.
Morerecentempiricalworkreplacestheproductionfunctionwithitsdual:thecostfunction.1NadiriandMamuneas(1994)usethecostfunctionapproachtoinvestigatetheimpactofpubliccapitalonthecoststructureoftheUSindustriesandobtainedsmaller,morecredible,estimatesofthebenefitsfrompubliccapital.HarchaouiandTarkhani(2003)applyasimilarapproachtoNadiriandMamuneas(1994)usingCanadiandata.
Finally,analternativenon-parametricapproachtoproductivityanalysisistakenbyBaldwin,GuandMacdonald(2010)basedonagrowthaccountingframework.Itfocusesonprivatesectorinputsandoutputs.Inputsthataredifficulttomeasureorinclude,suchaspubliccapital,arefoldedintoestimatesofmultifactorproductivity(MFP).Criticsofearlierstudiesthatadoptedthisapproachsaythatitisunclearhowlargeaneffectpubliccapitalhasonproductivitygrowthorwhethertheimpactvariesovertime.ThemorerecentresearchbyBaldwin,GuandMacdonald(2010),however,specificallyincorporatespubliccapitalusingthebenefitsestimatedbyHarchaouiandTarkhani(2003)andothers(Macdonald2010).
HarchaouiandTarkhani(2003)estimatetheeffectsofpubliccapitalonbusinesssectorproductioncosts,levelofoutput,demandforlabour,capital,andintermediategoodsusingCanadiandatafor37industriesfortheperiod1961-2000usingatranslogcostfunction.Theauthorsfoundthatanincreaseinpubliccapitalhasaninitialdirectproductivityeffect:itreducesthecostofproducingagivenlevelofoutputinalmostallindustries.Thiscost-reducing‘productivityeffect’ofpubliccapitalvariesinmagnitudeacrossindustries(seeAppendixAforatablereproducingtheirresults)withthelargestbenefitsaccruingtothetransportation,wholesale,retailandotherutilitysectors.Theeconomicimpactofpubliccapitalonthevariousindustriesdoesnotstopwiththedirectproductivityeffect.Costreductionspermitproductstobesoldatlowerpriceswhichcanbeexpectedtoleadtohighersalesandoutputgrowth.Theauthorsrefertothisasthe‘outputeffect’ofpubliccapital.
Thecost-reducingandoutput-expandingimpactsofpubliccapitalaffectthebusinesssector’sdemandforlabour,capitalandintermediateinputs.Theinitialproductivityeffectofanincreaseinpubliccapital
1Inaproductionfunction,firmsproducetheiroutputusingvariousinputs(capital,labour,materials,etc.)soastomaximizetheirprofits.Acostfunctionhasfirmsminimizingthecostofinputstoproducetheiroutput.Thecostfunctionisreferredtoasthedualoftheproductionfunctionbecausethetwoapproachesyieldthesameoutcomeintermsofinputsandoutputs.
![Page 8: THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE … · The Economic Benefits of Public Infrastructure Spending in British Columbia 1 Executive Summary There is a broad consensus that](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022053009/5f0c70ad7e708231d4356947/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
TheEconomicBenefitsofPublicInfrastructureSpendinginBritishColumbia
5
resultsinareductioninthedemandforlabourandintermediateinputsbutanincreaseinthedemandforprivatecapitalinallindustries.Whenindustryproductionlevelsincreaseduetothe‘outputeffect’ofpubliccapital,thechangeinthedemandforlabourandintermediateinputsisreducedwhilethedemandforprivatecapitalincreases.Thus,theoutputeffectofpubliccapitalreinforcesthe‘crowdingin’ofprivatecapitalformationsothatpubliccapitalcanbeseenashavinganimportantroleincontributingtoinvestment-ledeconomicexpansions,andimplyingthatpubliccapitalisacomplementtoprivatecapital.2
ThispaperusesthefindingsfromHarchaouiandTarkhanitoestimatetheeconomicbenefitsofthethreepublicinfrastructurespendingoptionsusingtheC4SE’sprovincialeconomicmodelingsystem.Thenextsectionsdiscussthestudymethodologyandassumptionsfollowedbytheresults.ResultsarepresentedintermsofimpactsuponGDP,employment,governmentrevenuesandfiscalbalancesovertime.Spendingmultipliersandreturnoninvestmentstatisticsaregeneratedtoprovidesummarymeasuresoftheresults.Thepaperconcludeswithsomeobservationsbasedontheresults.
2Criticsofpublicspendingcontendthatitcanactasasubstituteforprivatespendingthus‘crowdingout’privatespendingandreducingtheoverallimpactofpublicspending.The‘crowdingin’ofprivatespendingisthereverseofthisphenomenonwhereprivatesectorspendingrisesthroughthemultipliereffectofpublicspending.
![Page 9: THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE … · The Economic Benefits of Public Infrastructure Spending in British Columbia 1 Executive Summary There is a broad consensus that](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022053009/5f0c70ad7e708231d4356947/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
TheEconomicBenefitsofPublicInfrastructureSpendinginBritishColumbia
6
MethodologyandAssumptions
ThissectionreviewsthemethodologyandassumptionsrequiredtoassessthebenefitsofpublicinfrastructurespendinginBritishColumbia.Thebenefitsofapublicinfrastructureprogram–whichaccrueprincipallytotheconstructionsector3–arisefromthedirectprogramspendingandbeyond,withpubliccapitalpromotingeconomicgrowthandproductivity.Thereadershouldnotethatcurrentgovernmentspending(excludingdebtservicecharges)isnotdirectlyaffectedbyinfrastructurespending.Employmentinpublicadministration,publiceducationorhealthcarerises-orfalls-basedonchangesinprovincialpopulation-basedneedsandnotindirectresponsetotheconstructionofnewfacilities.Thestudy,therefore,assumesthatanyimprovementsoradditionstothestockofinstitutionalbuildingseitherreplacedecommissionedbuildingsormeetanticipatedincreasesindemandarisingfromchangesinpopulation.
TheprivateindustrycostelasticitiesestimatedbyHarchaouiandTarkhaniareusedtoreduceproductioncostsbythebusinesssectorintheC4SE’sprovincialeconomicmodelingsystem.AtableoftheirelasticitiesofcostswithrespecttopubliccapitalbybusinesssectorisreproducedinAppendixA.Thebenefitstoindustryintermsofreducedcostcontinueoverthedesignlifeofthepubliccapital.Maintainingthepublicinfrastructuresothatthenetcapitalstockvalueispreserved,therefore,allowsthesebenefitstopersistthroughoutthesimulationperiod.Alackofrepairandreplacementspendingafterthe5-yearprogramperiodwould,however,leadtoadeteriorationinthecostbenefitstoprivateindustry.Anotherimportantassumptionisthattheuseofpubliccapitalbyoneindustrydoesnotprecludeorreducethevalueofitsusebyanyotherindustry.
AScenario-basedApproachtoModelingUncertainty
TheprivateindustrycostelasticitiesestimatedbyHarchaouiandTarkhaniareconsideredplausiblebymanyeconomists.Theirworkcorrectsthemethodologicalconcernsofearlierstudiesandproduceselasticitiesthataresignificantlysmallerthanthosefromearlierempiricalstudies.Thereisstill,however,debateanduncertaintyoverthepreciselevelofbenefitconferredtoprivateindustryfrompubliccapital.
Uncertaintyisaddressedthroughasetofscenarios.Thefirstscenario,referredtoasthebaselinescenario,doesnotincludeanypublicinfrastructurespending.Thisisthebenchmarkagainstwhicheachoftheothershockscenariosiscompared.Apairofscenariosareprovidedtoevaluatetherangeofbenefitsoflowerindustrycosts:thefullbenefitscaseandthehalfbenefitscase.4ThehalfbenefitscasescenariohalvesHarchaouiandTarkhani’sbusinessindustrycostelasticitiesandreflectsthepossibilitythatsuchalargespendingprogram,whileaddressingmanyvitalinfrastructureneeds,mayalsoincludeanumberofprojectsoflowereconomicnecessityorvalue.Economistsrefertothis
3AtableofsectoralimpactsisincludedinAppendixC4Athirdshockscenarioisthezerobenefitscasewhichassumesthatpublicinfrastructureprovidesnobenefittoprivatebusiness.Theresultsfromthisscenarioareanextremecaseanddonotrepresentalikelyoutcome;sotheyarenotshowninthisreport.
![Page 10: THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE … · The Economic Benefits of Public Infrastructure Spending in British Columbia 1 Executive Summary There is a broad consensus that](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022053009/5f0c70ad7e708231d4356947/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
TheEconomicBenefitsofPublicInfrastructureSpendinginBritishColumbia
7
phenomenonas"diminishingmarginalreturnoninvestment."Thefullbenefitscaseisbasedonthefullvalueoftheestimatedcostelasticities.
![Page 11: THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE … · The Economic Benefits of Public Infrastructure Spending in British Columbia 1 Executive Summary There is a broad consensus that](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022053009/5f0c70ad7e708231d4356947/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
TheEconomicBenefitsofPublicInfrastructureSpendinginBritishColumbia
8
Results:TotalEconomicImpact
Thissectionofthereportpresentsthetotaleconomicimpactofthepublicinfrastructurespendingprogramdescribedintheprevioussection.TheanalysisisconductedusingtheC4SE’sprovincialeconomicmodelingsystemwhichisamulti-region,multi-sector,dynamicstochasticgeneralequilibriummodelofCanadaanditsprovinces.ThemodelisdescribedinmoredetailinAppendixB.
Theanalysisconsistsofsevenscenarios.Thebaselinescenariodoesnotincludeanyadditionalpublicinfrastructurespendingandisthebenchmarkagainstwhicheachoftheotherscenariosiscompared.Theothersixscenariosreflectchangesineconomicactivityarisingfromthepublicinfrastructurespendingprogramandaregroupedintothreesetsofshockscenarios.Theotherscenariosarethehalfandfullbenefitscaseswhichassumerespectivelythatthe5-yearcumulative$5billionpublicinfrastructureprogramprovideseitherhalforallthebenefitstoprivatebusinessestimatedbyHarchaouiandTarkhani.Thehalfandfullbenefitscasescenariosarethenrepeatedwith5-yearcumulativespendingprogramsof$7and$10billion.
Table2
Theresultsareconductedunderthemaintainedassumptionthatongoingprovincialpublicinfrastructurespendingissufficienttomaintainthestockofpubliccapitalatthelevelabovethebaselineattainedattheendofthe5-yearplanspendingperiod.Thisspendingensuresthattheboosttocompetitivenessforbusinessesintheprovincefromtheinitialinvestmentininfrastructuredoesnotdiminishovertime.Withoutthispost-planspending,thestockofpubliccapitalaffectingbusinesssectorcostswoulddecline-aswouldtheirestimatedcost-savingsbenefits.Assumingapermanentpost-planlevelofpublicrenewalspendinghasfiscalimplicationsoverthelongterm,butitalsoprovidesaperspectiveofthelong-runbenefitsarisingfromanew,stable,higherlevelofpublicinfrastructureintheprovince.
Table2summarizestheeconomicbenefitsfromthesescenariosbycomparingactivityinthesixpublicinfrastructurespendingscenariosagainstthebaselinescenario.
Short-runAverage(5year)
Long-runAverage(20years)
Short-runAverage(5year)
Long-runAverage(20years)
Short-runAverage(5year)
Long-runAverage(20years)
GDP(millionsof2016dollars)Halfbenefitstoprivatebusiness 1726 573 2417 803 3452 1147Fullbenefitstoprivatebusiness 1790 1098 2506 1537 3580 2195
Non-residentialInvestment(millionsof2016dollars)Halfbenefitstoprivatebusiness 1302 227 1822 318 2603 454Fullbenefitstoprivatebusiness 1350 366 1890 512 2700 732
Employment(thousands)Halfbenefitstoprivatebusiness 9.8 -2.2 13.7 -3.0 19.6 -4.3Fullbenefitstoprivatebusiness 9.2 -2.0 12.9 -2.8 18.4 -4.0
DifferencefromtheBaselineScenario
Spendingof$5billion Spendingof$7billion Spendingof$10billionBritishColumbiaPublicInfrastructureSpending:SummaryofEconomicImpacts
![Page 12: THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE … · The Economic Benefits of Public Infrastructure Spending in British Columbia 1 Executive Summary There is a broad consensus that](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022053009/5f0c70ad7e708231d4356947/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
TheEconomicBenefitsofPublicInfrastructureSpendinginBritishColumbia
9
ThetotalimpactsforthefullandhalfbenefitscasesinTable2includethedirectincreaseinpublicinfrastructurespendingplustheindirectimpactonBritishColumbiasupplierstotheconstructioncompaniesofeverythingfromofficesuppliestoconstructionequipmentusedintheconstructionprocessplustheinducedimpacts.Inducedimpactsincludetheimpactontheeconomyfromemployees(atthedirectandindirectlevelofimpact)spendingtheirincomes-andthentheincomethatprocessgeneratesbeingre-spentbyitsrecipients.Theprovincialeconomicmodelingsystemalsoconsiderschangesinbusinessinvestmentspendingarisingfromtheshiftsintheeconomy,changesinwages,prices,interestandexchangerates,andchangesinpopulationaspeoplemovebasedonprevailingeconomicconditions.Thesefactorscombinetoensurethatthetotalimpactislargerthanthedirectincreaseinspending.
TheaverageannualimpactonGDP,measuredinmillionsof2016dollars,duringthe5-year$5billionspendingprogramisbetween$1.7and$1.8billionforthehalfandfullbenefitscaseshigherthaninthebaselinescenario.Non-residentialfixedinvestmentalsorises,relativetothebaseline,overthisperiodwithaverageannualincreasesofbetween$1.3and$1.4billion.Itisworthnotingthattheaverageannualincreaseinfixednon-residentialinvestmentishigherthanthepublicinfrastructureprogramspendingof$1.0billionayear(expressedin2016dollars)forboththeshockscenariosasalsofoundbyHarchaouiandTarkhani.Theincreaseinaverageannualemploymentrelativetothebaselineisbetween9and10thousandforthetwoshockscenariosashigherproductivityinthefullbenefitscasescenarioslightlyreducestheincreaseinemploymentrelativetothehalfbenefitscasescenario.Intermsofperson-yearsofwork,the$5billioninfrastructurespendingprogramgeneratesbetween46and49thousandoverthe5yearsofprogramspending.
Afterthe5-year$5billioninfrastructureprogramends,reductionsinbusinesscostsincorporatedinthehalfandfullbenefitscasesleadtoaverageannualincreasesinGDP(measuredin2016dollars)relativetothebaselineofbetween$0.6and$1.1billionayear.Thelong-runimpactonnon-residentialinvestmentspendingfollowsthesamepatternasGDP.Thehalfbenefitscaseraisesaverageannualinvestmentby$0.2billionrelativetothebaselinescenariowhilethefullbenefitscaseraisesitby$0.4billion.Finally,thelong-runimpactonemploymentisdownbyaboutaround2,000forboththeshockscenariosrelativetothebaseline.Asaresult,labourproductivityisupforbothshockscenariosrelativetothebaseline.
Theoutput,investmentandemploymentimpactsforthe5-yearcumulative$7and$10billionpublicinfrastructurespendingplansvaryproportionallytothoseforthe$5billionplandiscussedabove.
![Page 13: THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE … · The Economic Benefits of Public Infrastructure Spending in British Columbia 1 Executive Summary There is a broad consensus that](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022053009/5f0c70ad7e708231d4356947/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
TheEconomicBenefitsofPublicInfrastructureSpendinginBritishColumbia
10
Table3
ThefiscalimplicationsfortheprovincialgovernmentarepresentedinTable3.Provincialgovernmentrevenues,measuredin2016dollars,riseanaverageof$0.3billionayearrelativetothebaselineforbothshockscenariosduringthe5-year$5billionspendingprogram.Afterthe5-yearprogramends,theaverageannualchangeinprovincialgovernmentrevenueisquitesmallrelativetothebaseline.Therevenueresponseforthe$7and$10billionspendingplansvariesproportionallytothoseforthe$5billionplan.
Theprovince’sfiscalbalance,onaPublicAccounts(PA)basis,improvesslightlyasashareofGDPforbothshockscenariosrelativetothebaselineduringthe5-year$5billionspendingprogram.However,theaverageannualbalancedeteriorates,asashareofGDP,0.2%afterthe5-yearspendingprogramendsastheamortizedcostoftheinfrastructurespendingisrealized.
EconomicMultipliersandReturnonInvestment
Economicmultipliersandreturnoninvestmentmeasuresareoftenusedtosummarizetheeconomicbenefitsofpublicorprivateactivities.5EconomicmultipliersarepresentedinTable4andmeasuretheshort-termbenefittotheeconomy-intermsofGDP,jobs,investmentorgovernmentrevenue-ofadollarofpublicinfrastructurespending.Returnoninvestmentstatisticsaregeneratedtosummarizethelong-runbenefitsofpublicspendingandarealsopresentedinTable4.Theprincipaldifferencebetweenthetwotypesofstatisticsisthatmultipliersareameasureofcontemporaneousbenefitwhilereturnoninvestmentstatisticsexpressthenetpresentvalueofbenefitsoverthelong-termasamultipleofcosts.
Short-runMultipliers
TheGDPmultiplierisgeneratedbydividingthechangeinrealGDPrelativetothebaselineforthe5-yearinfrastructurespendingperiod6bythechangeinpublicinfrastructurespending.ForGDP,theshort-runmultiplieris1.78.Thismeansthattheeconomyexpandsby$1.78forevery$1.00spentonpublicinfrastructure.
5Aneconomicmultiplieristhefactorbywhichthegainsinonemeasure–suchasGDPoremployment–aregreaterthanthefactor(investmentspending)thatcausedit.Thereturnoninvestmentisaperformancemeasureusedtoevaluatetheefficiencyofaninvestment.6ThemultipliersshowninTable4aregeneratedfromtheaverageofthefullandhalfbenefitscaseimpacts.
Short-runAverage(5year)
Long-runAverage(20years)
Short-runAverage(5year)
Long-runAverage(20years)
Short-runAverage(5year)
Long-runAverage(20years)
BCGovernmentRevenue(millionsof2016dollars)Halfbenefitstoprivatebusiness 291 18 408 25 582 36Fullbenefitstoprivatebusiness 290 58 406 81 580 115
BCGovernmentPADeficit(shareofGDP)Halfbenefitstoprivatebusiness -0.04 0.18 -0.06 0.24 -0.09 0.32Fullbenefitstoprivatebusiness -0.04 0.16 -0.06 0.20 -0.10 0.27
BritishColumbiaPublicInfrastructureSpending:SummaryofFiscalImpacts
DifferencefromtheBaselineScenario
Spendingof$5billion Spendingof$7billion Spendingof$10billion
![Page 14: THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE … · The Economic Benefits of Public Infrastructure Spending in British Columbia 1 Executive Summary There is a broad consensus that](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022053009/5f0c70ad7e708231d4356947/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
TheEconomicBenefitsofPublicInfrastructureSpendinginBritishColumbia
11
Table4
Theimpactonemploymentistypicallyexpressedintermsofjobspermilliondollarsspentonpublicinfrastructure.Theshort-runemploymentmultiplieris9.6jobspermilliondollars.
Thenon-residentialinvestmentmultiplieris1.35andmeasurestheextenttowhichinvestmentintheprivatesectorand,toalimitedextent,otherpartsofthepublicsectorexpandsinresponsetotheincreaseineconomicactivityfromthepublicinfrastructurespendingprogram.Thismeasure’svalue,ofmorethanone,providesevidenceofthe‘crowding-in’effectofpublicinfrastructurespendingwhereitencouragesadditionalprivateinvestment.
BritishColumbia'provincialgovernmentrevenuerises$0.29per$1.00ofprogramspending.Asthesemultipliersorrevenuerecoveryratesarelessthanone,theprovincialgovernmentfinancestheprogrambyrunninghigherdeficitsorlowersurpluses.
Long-runReturnonInvestment
ThelongertermbenefitsofpublicinfrastructurespendingareassessedthroughaReturnonInvestment(ROI)statistic.ROIcalculationscanbedefinedinavarietyofways.Thedenominatoristhenetpresentvalueofexpenditureorinvestmentovertimeassociatedwithaparticularoutcome.Thenetpresentvalueoftheoutcomeoverthesimulationperiodisthenumerator.Thebenefitassociatedwithavarietyofdifferentoutcomemeasurescanbeassessed.ThemostcommonoutcomesfromeconomicbenefitstudiestendtobeGDP,employmentandgovernmentrevenue.
DiscountRates
Thefutureisuncertain;sopeopleplacemoreimportanceonwhattheyhavetodayrelativetowhattheymayhaveinthefuture.Uncertaintyandpotentialrisksriseasyoulookfurtherintothefuture.Thisnotionof"discounting"thefutureisusedtoexpresshowmuchlesssomeonewouldaccepttodayinplaceofhigherbutuncertainfuturereturns.
Inthecontextofthisanalysis,theannualcostsandbenefitsgeneratedbytheProvincialEconomicModelingsystemovertheprojectionperiodareconvertedtocurrentdayvaluesusingadiscountrate.Inmanycasestheyieldonlong-termgovernmentbondsisusedtorepresentthediscountrate.Thisrateaccountsfortherisksfrombothinflationanduncertaintyaboutthefuture.However,theeconomicmeasuresconsideredinthisreportexcludetheimpactsofinflationsoalowerdiscountratecanbeused.Intheseinstancesadiscountrateofjust3%isusedbuthigheruncertaintysurroundingthepotential
HalfBenefits
FullBenefits
GDPper$ofspending 1.78 1.42 2.09NRinvestmentspendingper$ofspending 1.35 0.84 1.04Jobsper$millionofspending 9.6 1.1 1.1BCGov'ttaxrevenueper$ofspending 0.29 0.14 0.19
BritishColumbiaPublicInfrastructureSpending:SummaryofBenefitsLong-runReturnon
InvestmentImpactperdollarofpublicinfrastructurespending
Short-runTotalImpact
Multiplier
![Page 15: THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE … · The Economic Benefits of Public Infrastructure Spending in British Columbia 1 Executive Summary There is a broad consensus that](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022053009/5f0c70ad7e708231d4356947/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
TheEconomicBenefitsofPublicInfrastructureSpendinginBritishColumbia
12
benefitsfrompublicinfrastructuremayalsowarranttheuseofahigherdiscountrate.Thebenefitsbasedonhigherdiscountratesdonotmateriallyaffecttheconclusions.
ThecostsandbenefitsinthisstudyareassessedovertheprojectionhorizonintheProvincialEconomicModelingSystem(from2016to2040).Arithmeticallyextendingtheprojectionhorizonoutbeyond2040leadstostronger,positiveresultsatalldiscountratesfortheGDP,employmentandgovernmentrevenueROIstatistics.However,thisalternateapproachwasnotadoptedbecauseofthepotentialthatglobaleventsorother,disruptivetechnologiescouldariseinfuturedecadesaffectingtheassumedlong-termreturns.
TheROIstatisticsinthisstudyshowthenetbenefittosocietyfromthepublicinfrastructurespendingprogram.ThefirstROIstatisticshowsthediscountedvalueofGDP,measuredin2016dollars,perdollaroffunding(alsoexpressedin2016dollars).Thesecondstatisticshowsthediscountednumberofjobspermilliondollarsofspending.ThefinalROIstatisticsshowsthenumberofdollarsofadditionalProvincialtaxrevenue,expressedin2016dollars,perdollarspent.
Table4showstheROIstatisticsassociatedwiththefullandhalfbenefitspublicinfrastructurespendingscenarios.Theanalysisrevealsthat:
o TheoverallROIisexpressedintermsofdiscountedgrossdomesticproductdividedbydiscountedspendingtobuildandmaintainthenewpublicinfrastructure.Discountingfuturecostsandbenefitsby3%yieldsaROIofbetween$1.42and$2.09perdollarofspendingforthehalfandfullbenefitscasesrespectively.
o AROIcanalsobeexpressedintermsofjobsgeneratedper$1millionofspendingtobuildandmaintainnewpublicinfrastructure.Bothspendingscenariosgenerate1jobper$1millionoffundingata3%discountrate.
o Thereturnonpublicinvestmentisexpressedintermsofdiscountedprovincialgovernmenttaxrevenuesdividedbydiscountedprogramspendingtobuildandmaintainthenewpublicinfrastructure.Discountingfuturecostsandbenefitsby3%yieldsaprovincialtaxrevenueROIofbetween$0.14and$0.19perdollarofspendingforthehalfandfullbenefitscasesrespectively.
Overthelong-term,thegovernmentwillcollectbetween$0.14and$0.19inrevenueforeverydollaritspends.Thepublicinfrastructurespendingdoes,however,stimulateprivatesectorinvestmentandgeneratesignificantincreasesintheprovince’sGDPandproductivity.
![Page 16: THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE … · The Economic Benefits of Public Infrastructure Spending in British Columbia 1 Executive Summary There is a broad consensus that](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022053009/5f0c70ad7e708231d4356947/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
TheEconomicBenefitsofPublicInfrastructureSpendinginBritishColumbia
13
SummaryandObservations
AsustainedpublicinfrastructurespendingprogramcanlaythefoundationforfuturegrowthandprosperityinBritishColumbia.Productivepublicinfrastructurereducescostsforprivatebusinesses;providingacompellingcaseforpublicfundingofthiscapital.TheC4SEbelievesthatthefullbenefitscaseresults,basedonthecostelasticityestimatesfromHarchaouiandTarkhani,arecredibleandrepresentthebenefitsthatshouldaccruefromspendingonpublicinfrastructure.Butthereisariskthatalargeinfrastructureprogramcouldyieldlowerbenefitssothatthehalfbenefitscaseprovidesaprudentlower-boundtotheanalysis.
Theshort-runeconomicbenefitsincludeaGDPmultiplierof1.78,9.6jobsgeneratedpermilliondollarsspent,and$0.29ofprovincialgovernmentrevenuerecoveredperdollarspent.Theincreaseindomesticeconomicactivity,particularlynewconstructionsectorjobs,canbeattractiveinaslowgrowthenvironment;promptingvariousproponentsofpublicinfrastructurespendingtoarguethatitcanbeusefulincounteringthebusinesscycleovertheshort-term.TheC4SEconsidersthistobeaweakreasonforthisspendingandthatpublicinfrastructurefundingdecisionsshouldbebasedonlong-termneedssoastodeliverlastingbenefits.Correctlytimingfiscalpolicytocountertheeconomiccycleisdifficult.Ifprojectsarerushedsoastoboostshort-termdemandwithlimitedthoughtgiventotheirlong-termutilitytotheeconomy,thenthereisasignificantriskofnotrealizingtheoutcomesdescribedbythefullbenefitscasescenariosincethespendingyieldslesslong-termbenefitstooutputoremploymentwhilesaddlingtheeconomywithadditionaldebt.Infrastructurespendingmustbedirectedtowardsprojectsthatyieldlong-termbenefitstotheeconomy.
Overthelong-run,thereturnoninvestmenttoGDPfromspendingonpubliccapital,assuminga3%discountrate,liesbetween1.4and2.1forthehalfandfullbenefitscasescenarios.Thismeansthateverydollarinvestedininfrastructureresultsinanincreaseofupto$2inrealGDPoverthelong-term.Thisresultisstrongenoughtojustifyapublicinfrastructurespendinginitiativeandstillremainshighwhenhigherdiscountratesareassumed.Provincialgovernmentrevenuerecoveredisbetween$0.14and$0.19forthehalfandfullbenefitscasescenarioshelpingtomitigatethelong-runfiscalimpact.
Somecriticsmaynotethatthelong-runincreaseinemploymentofjust1jobgeneratedpermilliondollarsspentonpubliccapitalislowandthatthemoneywouldbebetterspentonotherpriorities-ornotspentatall.Thisresultarises,inpart,fromthedesignoftheC4SE'sprovincialeconomicmodelingsystemwherechangesinwageratesandmigrationforcetheunemploymentratetoadjusttowardsitsnaturalrateovertime.Whileemploymentgainsmaybelimited,businessesaremoreproductiveandcompetitiveandworkersearnhigherrealwages:upbetween0.4and0.5%afterthe5-yearspendingprogramendsinthehalfandfullbenefitscasescenariosrelativetothebaseline.
TheincreaseinpubliccapitalcanalsohelpachievesomethingelsethathaseludedpolicymakersinCanadaoverthelastfewyears:gainsinprivatesectorinvestmentspending.Apublicinfrastructureprogramboostsprivateinvestmentinboththenearandlong-termandcan,therefore,playanimportantroleincontributingtoaninvestment-ledeconomicexpansion.
![Page 17: THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE … · The Economic Benefits of Public Infrastructure Spending in British Columbia 1 Executive Summary There is a broad consensus that](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022053009/5f0c70ad7e708231d4356947/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
TheEconomicBenefitsofPublicInfrastructureSpendinginBritishColumbia
14
Insummary,thebenefitsofapublicinfrastructurespendingprograminclude:
o Higherprivatesectorinvestment,o Amoreproductiveeconomy,ando Ahigherstandardofliving.
Althoughthisstudyreportsthatsignificanteconomicbenefitscanberealizedfromtheprovince'spublicinfrastructureplan,spendingontheseassetsisalsorequiredtoachieveothersocialobjectivesthathavenotbeencapturedorquantifiedinthisanalysis.Thesebenefitsincludethosetohouseholdsfromlowertransportationcongestioncosts,improvedbusinessnetworkingopportunities,reductionsinpollutionandgreenhousegases,andsocietalgainsfromeducation,healthcareandotherpublicassets.
Inclosing,thisstudyalsoprovidesacautionarytaleforpolicyanalysts.Thecostsofneglectingourpublicinfrastructurearenotzero.AsnotedbyInfrastructureCanada(2011),allowingourpublicinfrastructuretocontinuetodecayimposescostsofatleastequalbutoppositeconsequencetothebenefitsestimatedinthisstudy.ThecompetitivenessofprivatebusinessesinBritishColumbiaaretiedtothequalityofitspublicassets,especiallygiventheshortfallofinfrastructureinvestmentinpreviousdecades.Therefore,asignificantandsustainedpublicinfrastructurespendinginitiativeisrequiredifhouseholdsandbusinessesaretocontinuetoenjoyahighstandardofliving.
![Page 18: THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE … · The Economic Benefits of Public Infrastructure Spending in British Columbia 1 Executive Summary There is a broad consensus that](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022053009/5f0c70ad7e708231d4356947/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
TheEconomicBenefitsofPublicInfrastructureSpendinginBritishColumbia
15
References
Aschauer,D.A.1989.“IsPublicExpenditureProductive?”JournalofMonetaryEconomics23(2):177–200.
Baldwin,J.,W.Gu,andR.Macdonald.2010.“IntegratedProductivityAccounts:ContributionstotheMeasurementofCapital.”TheCanadianProductivityReviewCatalogueno.15-206-X,no.027,EconomicAnalysisDivision.Ottawa:StatisticsCanada.
Baldwin,J.,H.Liu,andM.Tanguay.2015."AnUpdateonDepreciationRatesfortheCanadianProductivityAccounts."TheCanadianProductivityReviewCatalogueno.15-206-X,no.039,EconomicAnalysisDivision.Ottawa:StatisticsCanada.
CentreforSpatialEconomics,The.2015."TheEconomicBenefitsofPublicInfrastructureSpendinginCanada."Ottawa:BroadbentInstitute.
Harchaoui,T.M.,andF.Tarkhani.2003.“PublicCapitalanditsContributiontotheProductivityPerformanceoftheCanadianBusinessSector.”EconomicAnalysisResearchPaperSeriesCatalogueno.11F0027MIE,no.017,Micro-EconomicAnalysisDivision.Ottawa:StatisticsCanada.
InfrastructureCanada.2011.“BuildingCanadaPlan.”Ottawa:InfrastructureCanada.RetrievedJune9,2015fromhttp://www.infrastructure.gc.ca/prog/doc/booklet-livret03-eng.html.
Macdonald,R.2008."AnExaminationofPublicCapital'sRoleinProduction."EconomicAnalysisResearchPaperSeriesCatalogueno.11F0027M,no.050,Micro-EconomicAnalysisDivision.Ottawa:StatisticsCanada.
Nadiri,M.I.,andT.P.Mamuneas.1994.“InfrastructureandPublicR&DInvestments,andtheGrowthofFactorProductivityinUSManufacturingIndustries.”NBERWorkingPaperSeries,W.P.#4845.
Wylie,P.J.1996.“InfrastructureandEconomicGrowth,1946–1991.”CanadianJournalofEconomics,XXIX,SpecialIssue,S350-S355.
![Page 19: THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE … · The Economic Benefits of Public Infrastructure Spending in British Columbia 1 Executive Summary There is a broad consensus that](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022053009/5f0c70ad7e708231d4356947/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
TheEconomicBenefitsofPublicInfrastructureSpendinginBritishColumbia
16
AppendixA:ContributionofPublicCapitalattheIndustryLevel
ThefollowingtablecanbefoundinHarchaouiandTarkhani’spaper(Table5,p.17)andprovidesasummaryoftheirempiricalresults.Theindustrycostelasticities,ηCG,werederivedfromnationaldatafortheperiod1960-2000andindicatethepercentagechangeinthetotalprivatecostofproducingagivenlevelofoutputthatisassociatedwitha1%changeinthevalueofthepubliccapitalservicesandwereusedtoadjustindustrycostsintheC4SE’sprovincialeconomicmodellingsystem.Theimpactoncostsislargestfortransportationandthewholesaleandretailtradesectors.Theweightedaverageaggregateimpactonbusinesscostsistolowerthemby0.06%forevery1%increaseinpubliccapital.
Table5
ηCG 1/η 1/η* ηYGAgriculturalandrelatedservice -0.047 1.071 1.224 0.052Fishingandtrapping -0.001 0.981 1.024 0.001Loggingandforestry -0.014 1.012 1.091 0.014Mining -0.025 1.053 1.154 0.026Crudepetroleumandnaturalgas -0.037 1.091 1.193 0.041Quarryandsandpit -0.010 0.912 1.012 0.009Servicesincidentaltomineralextraction -0.012 0.946 1.029 0.011Food -0.037 1.026 1.141 0.038Beverage -0.035 1.044 1.159 0.037Tobaccoproductsindustry -0.019 0.984 1.043 0.019Rubberproducts -0.030 1.037 1.067 0.031Plasticproducts -0.017 1.047 1.093 0.018Leatherandalliedproducts -0.011 1.022 1.034 0.011Primarytextile -0.020 1.022 1.101 0.021Textileproducts -0.016 1.054 1.146 0.017Clothing -0.021 1.061 1.087 0.022Wood -0.031 1.034 1.053 0.032Furnitureandfixture -0.013 1.023 1.064 0.013Paperandalliedproducts -0.034 1.067 1.125 0.036Printingpublishingandallied -0.030 1.065 1.140 0.032Primarymetal -0.052 1.047 1.157 0.055Fabricatedmetalproducts -0.049 1.075 1.171 0.053Machineryind.(exceptelectricalmach) -0.053 1.125 1.234 0.060Transportationequipment -0.057 1.097 1.177 0.063Electricalandelectronicproducts -0.003 1.146 1.241 0.003Non-metallicmineralproducts -0.022 1.033 1.097 0.023Refinedpetroleumandcoalproducts -0.042 1.097 1.153 0.046Chemicalandchemicalproducts -0.035 1.058 1.197 0.037Othermanufacturing -0.002 1.012 1.074 0.002Construction -0.070 1.034 1.223 0.072Transportation -0.093 1.046 1.279 0.097Pipelinetransport -0.052 1.012 1.189 0.023Storageandwarehousing -0.015 1.022 1.086 0.015Communication -0.069 1.097 1.124 0.075Otherutility -0.061 1.012 1.087 0.062Wholesaletrade -0.118 1.055 1.191 0.125Retailtrade -0.121 1.063 1.221 0.129BusinessSector -0.062 1.058 1.176 0.066Source:HarchaouiandTarkhani,Table5,p.17
TranslogCostFunctionElasticities
![Page 20: THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE … · The Economic Benefits of Public Infrastructure Spending in British Columbia 1 Executive Summary There is a broad consensus that](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022053009/5f0c70ad7e708231d4356947/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
TheEconomicBenefitsofPublicInfrastructureSpendinginBritishColumbia
17
Note:ηCGistheprivatecostelasticitywithrespecttoprivatecapital;1/ηistheinternalreturntoscale,ortheeffectonoutputofa1%increaseinallinputs(privatecapital,labourandmaterials)exceptpubliccapital;1/η*istheoverallreturntoscale,ortheeffectonoutputofa1%increaseinallinputsincludingpubliccapital;ηYGisthemarginalproductivityofpubliccapital,ortheeffectonoutputofa1%increaseinpubliccapitalholdingotherinputsconstant.
![Page 21: THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE … · The Economic Benefits of Public Infrastructure Spending in British Columbia 1 Executive Summary There is a broad consensus that](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022053009/5f0c70ad7e708231d4356947/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
TheEconomicBenefitsofPublicInfrastructureSpendinginBritishColumbia
18
AppendixB:C4SEProvincialEconomicModelingSystem
TheC4SE’sProvincialModelingSystemisadynamic,multi-sector,regionaleconomicmodelofthecountry.Itincludesabottom-upsetofmacroeconomicmodelsfortheprovinces,theterritoriesandtherestoftheworld.Thenationalmodellinkseconomicactivityinoneregionwithactivityintheotherregionsthroughtrade.Theprovincialmodelsincludedetailedincomeandexpenditurecategoriesanddemographicandlabourmarketinformation.Thepurposeofthemodelingsystemistoproducemedium-tolong-termprojectionsoftheprovincialeconomiesandconductsimulationstudiesthatrequireindustryanddemographicdetail.
Thismodellingsystemconsistsofasetofprovincialandterritorialmacroeconomicmodelsthatarelinkedthroughtrade,financialmarketsandinter-provincialmigration.Theimpactonthesupplychain–intermsofoutputandemployment–isfullycapturedbythemulti-sectormodel,whichincorporatesthepurchasingpatternsfromthecurrentinput-outputtables.But,incontrasttoaninput-outputmodel,adynamicmacroeconomicmodelalsoconsiderstheimpactonsupplier’sinvestmentdecisionsthatoccurasaresultofthechangeineconomicactivity.
Themodelproducesimpactsonemployment,labourincome,valueaddedoutput,productivity,investmentandexportsforatleastfourteenindustrysectors(seelistbelow).Italsoproducestheimpactsongovernmentrevenuebylevelofgovernmentandsourceofrevenue.Thedynamicnatureofthemodel,however,makesitmorechallengingtodevelopasinglesummarymeasurethatprovidesa“rule-of-thumb”result.Theneedforsuchameasureissatisfiedbygeneratinganaverageimpactoverseveralyearsofthesimulationor,whenappropriate,aReturnonInvestmentstatistic.
C4SEModel–IndustrySectors
AgricultureOtherPrimary(detailvariesbyprovince)Manufacturing(detailvariesbyprovince)ConstructionUtilitiesTransportation&WarehousingWholesale&RetailTrade
Finance,Insurance&RealEstateProfessional,Scientific&ManagementServicesAccommodation&FoodHealthServicesOtherServicesEducationServicesGovernmentServices
Themodelincorporatespartialpolicyresponsestoeconomicdevelopments.Intermsofmonetarypolicy,theBankofCanadaadjustsinterestratesusingaTaylorRulereactionfunctionthatrespondstoinflationrelativetoitstargetrateandtheunemploymentraterelativetothenaturalrateofunemployment.TheexchangeratereactstoCanada-USinterestratedifferentialsandchangesinthepurchasingpowerparityvalueofthedollar.Intermsoffiscalpolicy,governmentspendingis,formanycategories,afunctionofpopulation,whilegovernmentrevenuereactstochangesinthetaxbase.
Thefollowingsectionsprovidethereaderwithmoreinformationonthestructureoftheindividualprovincialmodelsandthenationalmodelthatunitestheprovincialandterritorialmodels.
![Page 22: THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE … · The Economic Benefits of Public Infrastructure Spending in British Columbia 1 Executive Summary There is a broad consensus that](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022053009/5f0c70ad7e708231d4356947/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
TheEconomicBenefitsofPublicInfrastructureSpendinginBritishColumbia
19
ProvincialModels
Theprovincialandterritorialmodelsareverysimilarinstructure–theparametersineachmodeldiffertoreflectdifferencesintheeconomicexperienceofeachregion.
Theprovincialmodelsaresimilarinnaturetoageneralequilibriummodel,butfullproductandfactorsubstitutionisnotimplemented.Atpresent,substitutionisrestrictedtotheenergyproductsandvalue-added.Forpurposesofmanageabilitythereisonlyonewagerateandonesetofcostofcapitalmeasures–constructionandequipment–inthemodel.Changesinthesemeasuresoflabourandcapitalcostscauselabourandcapitalintensitiestochangeacrossallsectorsoftheeconomy.
Themodel'seconomyisorganizedintofourbroadsectors.Firmsemploycapitalandlabourtoproduceaprofit-maximizingoutputunderaCobb-Douglasconstant-returns-to-scaletechnology.Householdsconsumethedomesticandforeignproductsandsupplylabourundertheassumptionofutilitymaximization.Governmentspurchasethedomesticandforeignproductsandproduceoutput.Foreignerspurchasethedomesticproductandsupplytheforeignproduct.
Therearetwomainmarketsinthemodel.Thesemarketscorrespondtothedomesticandforeignproductsandthelabourmarket.Eachofthesemarketsisconcernedwiththedeterminationofdemands,supplies,andprices.Likemostsub-nationalmodels,theBritishColumbiamodelassumesthatmostpricesaresetinnationalmarkets.ThepresenceoftheNationalmodelinthesystemmeansthatinterestrates,exchangeratesandthepriceofsomegoodsandservicesareaffectedbychangesineconomicactivityinBritishColumbiaandtherestofthecountry.
Insub-nationaleconomies,themovementoflabourisakeyfactorintheadjustmentofthelocaleconomytochangesineconomicconditions.TheC4SE’smodelallowsnetmigration–andthereforethetotalpopulation–toadjustovertimetoreflectchangesineconomicconditions.Iftheeconomyandemploymentisgrowing,thenthedemandforlabourrisesandnetmigrationrises.Thisfeatureisanimportantconsiderationwhenexaminingeconomicimpactsoveroneormoredecades.
NationalModel
ThedesignofthenationalmodeliswhatmakestheC4SE’ssystemunique.Thenationalblockaddsuptheeconomicactivityacrossthecountryandusesthisinformationtohelpdetermineprices,interestrates,exchangeratesandtherest-of-countryexternaldemandforgoodsandservices–allfactorsthatareexogenoustotheotherprovincialmodellingsystems.
Toseewhythisisimportant,consideranincreaseinoneprovince’seconomy.Thisraisesthatprovince’sdemandforimports.Inthissystemeachoftheotherprovincesseesanincreaseindemandfortheirexportstothatprovincewhich,inturn,raisestheirowneconomies.Theincreaseineconomicactivitywillputupwardpressureprices,interestratesandtheexchangerate.Theentirenationaleconomy,therefore,adjustsovertimetotheinitialshock.
![Page 23: THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE … · The Economic Benefits of Public Infrastructure Spending in British Columbia 1 Executive Summary There is a broad consensus that](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022053009/5f0c70ad7e708231d4356947/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
TheEconomicBenefitsofPublicInfrastructureSpendinginBritishColumbia
20
AppendixC:SectoralImpacts
HalfBenefits
FullBenefits
HalfBenefits
FullBenefits
HalfBenefits
FullBenefits
HalfBenefits
FullBenefits
HalfBenefits
FullBenefits
HalfBenefits
FullBenefits
AllIndustries(basicprices) 1,583 1,642 531 1,016 2,216 2,299 743 1,422 3,165 3,284 1,061 2,031Agriculture 6 7 5 10 9 10 6 14 13 14 9 21OtherPrimary 73 82 47 109 103 115 65 153 146 164 93 218Manufacturing 66 77 68 157 92 108 96 219 131 154 137 314Utilities 26 27 10 17 37 38 14 24 53 54 20 35Construction 748 766 132 181 1,047 1,072 185 253 1,496 1,531 265 361Transportation&Warehousing 56 60 39 92 79 84 54 128 113 120 77 183Trade 177 188 77 148 248 263 107 207 354 375 153 295Finance,Insurance&RealEstate 161 161 47 92 225 225 66 128 322 322 95 183Information,Professional,Scientific,Managerial 128 134 64 128 179 188 90 179 255 268 129 255Accommodation&FoodServices 32 31 10 20 44 43 14 28 63 62 20 39EducationServices 7 6 -2 -3 9 9 -3 -4 13 12 -4 -5Health&SocialServices 5 5 -1 -2 7 7 -1 -3 11 10 -2 -4OtherServices 93 94 35 70 131 132 49 97 187 188 70 139GovernmentServices 4 4 -1 -2 6 6 -1 -2 8 8 -2 -3
Note:sectorimpactsinthistablearereportedatbasicprices;allotherGDPimpactsusedinthisstudyarereportedatmarketprices
Spendingof$5billion Spendingof$7billion Spendingof$10billionBritishColumbiaPublicInfrastructureSpending:SectoralImpacts
DifferencefromtheBaselineScenarioinMillionsof2016Dollars
Short-runAverage Long-runAverage Short-runAverage Long-runAverage Short-runAverage Long-runAverage