the distribution of student's ratio for samples from an exponential population
TRANSCRIPT
This article was downloaded by: [York University Libraries]On: 20 November 2014, At: 08:14Publisher: Taylor & FrancisInforma Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House,37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK
Communications in Statistics - Theory and MethodsPublication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information:http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/lsta20
The distribution of student's ratio for samples from anexponential populationA.K.M. Sirajul Hoq a , Mir M. Ali b & J.G.C. Templeton ca Department of Mathematics , University of Riyadh , Riyadh, Saudi Arabiab Department of Mathematics , University of Western Ontario , London, Canadac Department of Industrial Engineering , University of Toronto , Toronto, CanadaPublished online: 27 Jun 2007.
To cite this article: A.K.M. Sirajul Hoq , Mir M. Ali & J.G.C. Templeton (1978) The distribution of student's ratio forsamples from an exponential population, Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 7:9, 837-850, DOI:10.1080/03610927808827675
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03610927808827675
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) containedin the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make norepresentations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of theContent. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, andare not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon andshould be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable forany losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoeveror howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use ofthe Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematicreproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in anyform to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
CO4nlUN. STATIST. -THEOR. X T H . , A 7 (9) , 337-850 (1973)
A.K.M. Sirajul Hoq
Department of Industria: Engineering University of Toronro
Toronto, Canada
K e y Fiords and P h r a s e s : r o b u s t n e s s o f t - t e s t ; t a i l p r o b a b i l i t i e s ; g e o m e t r i c a l p r o b a b i l i t y ; s m a l l s a m p l e s t a t i s t i c s ; t e s t s o f l o c a t i o n ,
For a sample of size n drawn from an exponential population
with location parameter p and scale parameter o, let T = &/;;I?-)~)/s
where X is the sample mean and S, the sample standard deviation given by (n-l)s2 = Z (Xi-xi2. Pr {T 2 ti is obtained for values of
1,
t 2 ( (n-1) (n-2)/2)-2. For the special cases n = 2 , 3 , 4 exact expres-
sions for the probability are obtained for all values of t. This
work is motivated by a paper of Hotelling (13611, in which, among
other results, he obtained Pr { ~ 2 t ? for tln-1.
Copyright @ 1978 hy Marcel Dekker . Inc. All Rights Reserved, Neither this work n o r any part m s y be r ep roduced o r t r a n s m ~ t t e d In any f o r m o r by any means, e l e c t r o n ~ c o r mechanical , mcluding pho tocopymg, mic ro f i lm~ng , and recording, o r by a n y in fo rmat lon s torage and r e t r ~ e v a l system, w ~ t h o u t pe rmiss~on in w r ~ t i n g f r o m the publisher .
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Yor
k U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 0
8:14
20
Nov
embe
r 20
14
' INTXCCCCTIC>T A.
Hotelling (1961) obtained the tail probabilities of the
L - - - 3LaLIJLLC ,-: -&: - r ~ r - -,,-allies ~f t > 3-ll i;:ier. the u.-iderlyir.i; s;~>le 1s
assumed to arise frum the expneiit~al oopuiaiion. i ie e x t e i d t i z i 5
+- :-->..2,. ..-.-~.-+ - A , ( < - - I , - - . ? \ d J 5 L C J U L L LV L ' I I - iLLUC Y a L u C 3 GI. i - ( i , ' i, i i l ii/L) .
In performing a :-test, the relevant portion of tkc discri-
burion of the t-stat-stic is rhe tail probabilities. A - - + - L --ste
in general, is called for when the sample size is small. Hence . . tht2 ~ x a c i thii prc,baiii i iirs, idpL)~~xi~~!-ti~~1~ ofLt!l ric.1 r LICLII 'J
accurate) of the t-distribution for small sam~les when the under-
lying sample is assumed to ar;se from a specifled nonnormal ppU-
lation would enable one to ascertain whether a test valid under
the normal~ty asscmption would also be robust under the sceclfier'
nonnormality assumption.
The present work, wb.ile a r i s i n g out ~ J E problems in robustness
studles, 1s in itself a very specialized and restricted mathematl-
.̂., _--Ll-_ L ~ L ~ L U U L C L L L . Hence. it has not been felt worth iiiiile to survey tte
literature in robustness of tests. However, two excellent re-
ports, one by Posten and Hatch (1966) and the other, an annotated
bibliography of robustness studies by Govindarajulu and Leslie
(1970) survey many of the works that bear on the question of ro-
bustness. Paong several more recent works, we I--+;-P ,,L.,Li,. Sansing and .. Owen ( L Y i r i , ~ u e n and iiurrhy (1974) and Sansing (13761. Hoq, Aii
and Templeton (19761, in a more detailed version of the present
paper, give additional details of proofs and a solution (not in
closed form! for the tail probabilities for ((n-l) (r,-3) / 4 ! 5 < t k
5 ((n-11 (n-2!/2) 2 .
2. THE PROBLEM
A sample Xl,XZ, . . . , X of size n is drawn from an exponential '1
population having the cumulative distribution function F(x) =
1 - { exp( - ( x - s ) / a ) } for x t g , zero otherwise. The sample has - - 2
mean X = Z X . /n and standard deviation S given by (n-1) S' = Z ( X . -!<I .
Student's ratio T is defined by T = &(T-U)/S. The problem is the Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Yor
k U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 0
8:14
20
Nov
embe
r 20
14
S.QPIES FROM A?: ESPONEYTI.-V. POPULATIOS
8 -- wnere tr.e aomarn i ' = : x , , . . . , x v n x / s l t and x . 2 0 for i = l , . . . , n 1
- i - n. wzth x = Lx ,'n ar.5 (n-1)s' = L ! x . - x) .
1
>;e make the transformations (Ti) , (T2) , !Ti! , defined below, > - -,,-,----,-,- L.. ..LA.,-->a-U.,~
(Ti) Order x l P x 2 , . . . , x in ascending order of magnitude O r ui 5 u, -. n A - I... < u , say, then the ordered transformation (T1) : ( x i , . . . , ~ 1 - (U l,...,~ 1 has Jacobian equal to n!. The domain r is changed to
2 0 for i = 2,. . . ,n?. (T2) Thls 1s followed by the --
orthogonal Heimert's transformatzon
havinq Jacobian equal to 1 and
defined by
r -- yl = ( U +u2 + . .. + U ) / g n = jnu
I and
for i = 2, ..., n; say Y = HU in obvious matrix notation, so that
T U = H Y. The domain r is now transformed to Y2 given by
1
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Yor
k U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 0
8:14
20
Nov
embe
r 20
14
840
and
f o r L = 2 ; ..., n-1 and 1: 2 0.
( T 3 ) F ~ n a i l y t n e g e n e r a i ~ ~ e d p o l a r c r a n a f o r m a c ~ o n ,:3 : - T ~ , . . lrn) + ( r , 8 l , . ,'i ) w l t h O r r C m , 0 - 4 ( 7 f o r l = l , . . . , n-2;
n-1 1
and 0 5 Y c iT g l v e n 3 y n- 1
for i = 2 , . . . . n-1 and
n- 1 h a s t h e J a c o b i a n r J ( b l , . . - 1 where w e define
1 ~ n - 1
n- i-1 ) n- i- 2 J ( 5 , , . - . , = ( s i n 3 . 1 ( s i n 0 . . . . s i n S ~ + 1 3-2 '
( 2 )
E, = { ( o , , . . . , 8 / 9 5 8 . ~ ~ 1 2 ; i = l , . . . , n-i: ( 3 ) L A. 3-1' - i
and
D:, = ( e l , . . . ,9n-l) 1 c o t 5 2 tlJn-1, c o s s r ( c o t ' S ~ ) / G T , - 2
4, f ( n - i ) 2 cos 0 . S ( n - i + 2 ) c o t $ , f o r i = 2 , . . . , n - 2 , ~ n / ' 3 j *
l + l 1 n - l
I n a r r i v i n g a t r 3 , we s e e t h a t s t r a i q h t f o m a r d substitution i n
1,
y, 2 y2 and in-i+2 j l iy 2 - + f o r 1 . 2 , . . . , r-: and 1 2 0
L y i e l d s fi s i n 0 cos 5, 5 c o s 31 , (n - i j 2 s i n 8 , . . . s i n Y i c o s 5 .
1 L - l+l 5
< (n - i+2) s i n 0 . . . s i n 8 , c o s 3 fo r i = 2 , . . . ,n-2 and s i n 8 1-1 i l...
s i n 8 2 J . The i a s t i n e q u a l i t y s with 0 5 6 , 5 7i for i = 1 n- 1
, . . . ,n-2 1
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Yor
k U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 0
8:14
20
Nov
embe
r 20
14
n - l
..- , - ~ ,.I re .J snr: C .% a re d r f iiied in , L a : 3 . 2:rect i n t e g r a t l a r ,
i
.,. ̂ , i f rcmark a t his p o i n t t h a t t h e domaln r , i n t e rms of
n-dimensional qeometry, can be s h n w n to be t h e ort ti on of a cone
x i t h apex a t t h e o r i g i n , a x l s a s t h e e q u i a n g u i a r Llne t o t h e co- -
o r d l n a c e axes and s e m i v e r t i c a l a n g l e a r c c o t ! t f ln -1) con ta ined i n
t n e p o s r t l v e o r t h a r t . For t z n - 1 it can be shown t h a t t h e h a l f -
cone l i e s wholly l n s i d e t h e o r t h a n t and i n t h i s c a s e t h e evalua-
t i o n of t h e l n t e g r a l i n (1) is e a s i l y accomplished. T h i s case was
s t u d i e d by H o t e l l i n g ( 1 9 6 1 ) . For s m a l l e r v a l u e s of t , t h e pro-
blem is nontrivial and f a r from easy . In g e n e r a l , depending on
t h e v a l u e o f t , t h e fo l lowing c o n f i g u r a t i o n s a r . i s e : t h e cone i n t e r -
s e c t s t h e (n -k) - faces of t h e o r t h a n t , b u t d o e s n o t i n t e r s e c t
lower-dimensional f a c e s f o r k = 1 , ..., n-1. In what f o l l o w s we w i l l
n o t use any g e o m e t r i c a l i n t u i t i o n o r argument, s o we w i l l no t en-
t e r i n t o any d e t a i l e d g e o m e t r i c a l d i s c o u r s e . We ex tend Hotel-
l i n g ' s work t o i n c l u d e t h e c a s e k = l o n l y . The method employed i s
c a p a b l e of e x t e n s i o n t o h i g h e r v a l u e s of k , b u t computat ions be-
come t e d i o u s and unwieldy. F i n a l l y we remark t h a t t h e t r a n s f o r -
mat lons ( T l ) , (T21, (T3) were mot iva ted by g e o m e t r i c a l cons idera -
+ ; ,,,ns. r. ( T i ) maps t h e p o s i t i v e o r than t . i n t o l /n ! p a r t of i t s e l f
and t h e symmetry of x , , - . . , x a p p e a r i n g i n (1) s u g g e s t s t h i s -
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Yor
k U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 0
8:14
20
Nov
embe
r 20
14
84 2 H O Q , XLI, XUD T L Y P L E T O N
Transformations in n-j+2 dimensions, analogous to
!T3!, applied in suqcession to the above lnteqral
(Tl), (T2) and
n i .in r Y A W L
and since
rhe proof of the lemma is obvious
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Yor
k U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 0
8:14
20
Nov
embe
r 20
14
obtain
for t - n-1, the result obtalned by Hotelllnq (1961) geometrically.
In Case L , the denslty f (t) = -dG (t)/dt = (n - 1) G (t)/t.
so that arc cot (n-1)lI2 5 8 < arc cot (t/ih-1.). In this case the I -
domain D n D appearing in ( 4 ) and defined in ( 3 ) can be written 1 2
as A, u A 2 , where A, and A2 are disjoint sets defined below, with - -
C2, C defined as in the above lemma. 3
7 - n = j Q , 'E12 j arc cot in-1 8 i arc cot (t/Jn-11, '-2 - 1-
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Yor
k U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 0
8:14
20
Nov
embe
r 20
14
HOO, A L I , AND TEYPLETO?;
so t h a t
a r c c o t t / d n - 1 - 1 3-2
n n ! - 1 ! ~ ( t ) = i (tan? 1 ) sec2i.d4 i 1 j 0
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Yor
k U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 0
8:14
20
Nov
embe
r 20
14
SLhPLES FROM ,LY EY?ONI?:TIAL ?GDULATIOS
where x = t 2 / ( n - 1 ) 2 , B(a,b) = : ' ( a ) T . ( b ) / i ' ( a + b ) is t h e o r d i n a r y Be ta
-1 .x a - 1 f u n c t i o n a n d 1 ( a r b ) = [ B ( a , b ) ] J O w ( ~ - w ) ~ - ' d w , 1 2 ~ x 5 1 , is
t h e incomplete Beta f u n c t i o n .
Hence we have f i n a l l y
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Yor
k U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 0
8:14
20
Nov
embe
r 20
14
846 HDQ, XLI, .LXD TEWLETO?:
Case 2 by
Using the results obtarned above, we can compute tie tall
area G ( t ) and denslty f (t) for n = 2 , 3 , 4 . For all n, G?(t) = i n
G 3 ( t ) = { I -3 /2 -2 -1 /2 -2 -1/2 -1 2 1 / ? j 4 1 ~ 3 t - 4 ( 3 ) t arc cos(t/2) + 3 t ( 4 - t
for 1 - t ' 2 ,
33 /2 ( 2 ) - l n (t-2-t-3) - i f j ) - 1 ( 3 ) - 1 / 2 n for ~ / S S t 5 3
2 1 9 - 3 t I
33 /2 ( 2 1 - I n (t-2-t-3) + 3-1/22-1t-2 1t2-27)arc tan i- i - 2 1 I
i A= J
5 / 2 - 3 +3 t arc tan
-1 /2 -1 2 1 / 2 - ( 6 ) -1 (3) -w7 +2 t ( 3 - t ) Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Yor
k U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 0
8:14
20
Nov
embe
r 20
14
SXVLES FROff A Y E X T O N E X T I A L P O P U L A T I O N
.)r 1 % - 2 iir,i; 4 ; XE chi; ahth in t:;c expectcitio:: cf T , ,i:hich is
of some i n t e r e s t f o r comparison with asympto t ic formulas o b t a i n e d
54' Shenton and 3oiman (19771, and a l s o q i v e s some a d d i t i o n a l rn-
formarlon about t h e d i s t r i b u t i o n . For n = 2 , t h e e x p e c t a t i o n o t T
does not e x l s t . W e f i n d
i
Table I q i v e s v a l u e s of G i t ) and %bile I I g i v e s v a l u e s of
E ( t ) , f o r n = 2 , 3 , 4 and a few v a l u e s o f t l F i g u r e 1 shows f ( t ) n n
f o r n = 2 , 3 , 4 . Values o f G ( t ) an? f !t) f o r
r 2 i i n - i i ( n - 2 j j 2 j li2 can be compute? using a
g iven by Hoq, A l i and Templeton 11977). The
any r? and any
computer prograii!
fo rmulas f o r G ( t )
aiid f ( t ) ..-,. U a ~ d i n t h e progrzm have been o b t a i n e d from t h o s e g iven n
above by expanding t h e incomplete Gamma f u n c t i o n i n a f i n i t e
s e r i e s of approximately n/2 te rms . D i f f e r e n t s e r i e s a r e used f o r
odd and even v a l u e s o f n.
4. DISCUSSION
R e s u l t s glven l n Table I can be compared w l t h t h e correspond-
rng r e s u l t s fo r t h e T - d ~ s t r l b u t i o n f o r a normal p a r e n t population.
I t can t h u s be seen t h a t t h e upper t a l l o f t h e T - d r s t r l b u t l o n IS
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Yor
k U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 0
8:14
20
Nov
embe
r 20
14
TABLE I
Probability Density Function of the Student t-Statistic for Samples of Size n from an Exponential Population.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Yor
k U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 0
8:14
20
Nov
embe
r 20
14
SLhPLES TROhl ;LU EYPOSEXTIAL POPUWTIOS
FIG 1
PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION f , ( I ) FOR n = 2 3 4
heavier when t h e p a r e n t d i s t r i b u t i o n is e x p o n e n t i a l t h a n when t h e
p a r e n t d i s t r i b u t i o n is normal. T h l s i s h a r d l y s u r p r i s i n g , s i n c e
we know t h a t t h e T - d i s t r i b u t i o n h a s G " ( 1 ) = 1 f o r e x p o n e n t i a l pa-
r e n t and G (1) 5 . 2 5 f o r normal p a r e n t . In work t o be r e p o r t e d
e l sewhere , we have compared t h e t a i l s of t h e T - d i s t r i b u t i o n s w i t h
e x p o n e n t i a l p a r e n t and w i t h half-Gaussian p a r e n t ( d e n s i t y f ( x ) =
2 ( 2 / 7 ~ ) '"exp (-x / 2 ) ) , x 2 0. The ha l f -Gauss ian p a r e n t g i v e s a hea-
vier upper t a i l f o r a l l n , when t > n - l .
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The f i n a n c i a l s u p p o r t of t h e Nat iona l Research Counci l of
Canada and o f t h e Canadian I n t e r n a t i o n a l Development Agency is
acknowledged, T h e computer program was w r i t t e n i n F o r t r a n I V G l
by Ger t rude I p . We acknowledqe h e l p f u l comments by a r e f e r e e . Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Yor
k U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 0
8:14
20
Nov
embe
r 20
14
850 HOO, A L I , AXD TDIPLETON
Govindarajulu, 5. & Leslie, 2.T. (197Q) . .Lm.otated 5~5l:c~r-pr.y on robustness studies. Tech. Report 7, Dept. of StatlSt., Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington, ken tuck;^.
~ o q , & . K . M " S , ; ~:i, M,:.:. & Templetar:, 2.Z.C. i?377: nc -c~~ iL . UL~L.. ~ t l . _ ~ ~ . ~ ~ *;?-
, . - of Student's ratio based on exponential ?opuidiion. wvrkiny Paper #77-001, Dept. of Industrial Engineering, Univ. of m -- rn -,,
" . I , " ! I O L " L L t S , CazaZz.
Hotelllng, 3 . (1961). The behavlor of some standard statlstlcal tests lunder non-standard conditions, Proc. 4th BerkeLeys.jmp= w ~ t h S t a t i c + P r n h lj 319-60. . . - -. . . - - - - - - - . - - - - . -
Posten, H,O, & Hatch, L,O, (1966). Robustness of the Student- a survey. Research Report 2 c , Ee3t. of Statist.,
Univ. of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut.
Sansing, ?..C. (1976). The t-statistic for double expon-ential distribution. S I A M J. Appl. Math. 31, - 634-45.
Sansing, R.C. & Owen, O.B. (1974). The density of the t-statis- tic for non-normal distributions. Commun. Statist. 3(2), 139-55.
Shenton, L.R. & Bowman, K.O. (1977). A new algorithm for summins divergent series. Part 3: Appl~cations. J. Cornput. Appl. Math. 3, 35-51. -
"..-.. L U = L L , X.K. & Yarthy, V.X. (1374). Percentage points of the Zis-
trib'utlon of Student's t when the parent 1s Student's t. Technometrics 16, 495-97.
R e c e i v e d M a r c h , 1977; R e v l s e d J u n e , 1 9 7 8 .
R e f e r e e d b y K a r e n Y u e n , U n l v e r s l t y of W l n d s o r , O n t a r i o .
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Yor
k U
nive
rsity
Lib
rari
es]
at 0
8:14
20
Nov
embe
r 20
14