the developments in the transportation of oil from russia ...existing pipeline planned pipeline...

21
May 2008 1 TRANSBALKAN PIPELINE B.V. TRANSBALKAN PIPELINE B.V. HELPE – THRAKI A.E. Christos Dimas General Manager HELPE – THRAKI A.E. The Originator and Greek Shareholder of the BAP Project The Developments in the Transportation of Oil from Russia and the Caspian Sea Region and The Burgas – Alexandroupolis (BAP) Oil Pipeline Project International Conference “2nd South East Europe Energy Dialogue” Thessaloniki, 21 – 22 May 2008 INSTITUTE OF ENERGY FOR SOUTH-EAST EUROPE

Upload: others

Post on 22-Oct-2020

5 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • May 2008

    1

    TRANSBALKAN PIPELINE B.V.TRANSBALKAN PIPELINE B.V.HELPE – THRAKI A.E.

    Christos DimasGeneral Manager

    HELPE – THRAKI A.E.The Originator and Greek

    Shareholder of the BAP Project

    The Developments in the Transportation of Oil from Russia and the Caspian Sea Region

    andThe Burgas – Alexandroupolis (BAP)

    Oil Pipeline Project

    International Conference“2nd South East Europe Energy Dialogue”

    Thessaloniki, 21 – 22 May 2008

    INSTITUTE OF ENERGYFOR SOUTH-EAST EUROPE

  • May 2008

    2

    Russian and Caspian Main Crude Export Routes

    Taishet

    Dqing

    Baku-

    LegendMajor Oil basins

    Barents Sea

    Timan Pechora

    East Siberia

    West Siberia

    Caucasus & Caspian

    Volga Urals

    Sakhalin

    Tengiz

  • May 2008

    3

  • May 2008

    4

  • May 2008

    5

    Russian and Caspian Main Crude Export Routes

    TaishetScovorodino

    Daqing

    Kozmino

    Primorsk

    Murmansk

    Alashankou

    Atasu

    KumkolKenkiyak

    Baku

    Novorossiysk

    Ceyhan

    Burgas-Alex/lis

    LegendExisting crude pipelines

    Planned crude pipelines

    Major Oil basins

    Barents Sea

    Timan Pechora

    East Siberia

    West Siberia

    Caucasus & Caspian

    Volga Urals

    Far East &Sakhalin

    Tengiz

    Odessa

    Supsa

  • May 2008

    6

  • May 2008

    7

    Karatschaganal

    6

    Kazakhstan’s Crude Oil Export Routes

    HELPE – THRAKI A.E.

    Existing Soviet-era pipeline

    Existing Soviet-era pipelineSupplying China with Russian oil

    Aktau

    Baku

    To Neka

    Makhachkala

    Uzen

    Kashagan

    Mangistau

    Karatschaganal

  • May 2008

    Kurmangazy

    Augusta

    Trieste

    Omishali

    Brody

    Feneshlitkye

    Unecha

    Odessa

    Constanta

    BurgasAlexandroupolis

    Ceyhan

    Baku

    Supsa

    Novorossiysk

    Tengiz

    Samara

    Tscheljabinsk

    from Surgut

    ToUS-Market

    Sisak

    Plotsk

    Gdansk

    existing pipelineplanned pipelineTanker transport

    Vlore

    Aktau

    Kashagan

    Karatschaganak

    Makhachkala

    Tehran

    Tikhoretsk

    Batumi

    CPC Pip

    eline

    OVERVIEW MAPOVERVIEW MAPCRUDE CRUDE OILOIL EXPORTEXPORTCHAINSCHAINS

    Atyrau

    Neka Port

    Tuapse

    A. C. G.Mega Structure

    Oil Field

    Augusta

    Trieste

    Omishali

    Brody

    Feneshlitkye

    Unecha

    Odessa

    Burgas

    Alexandroupolis

    Ceyhan

    Baku

    Supsa

    Novorossiysk

    Tengiz

    Samara

    Tscheljabinsk

    from Surgut

    ToUS-Market

    Sisak

    Plotsk

    Gdansk

    Vlore

    Aktau

    Kashagan

    Karatschaganak

    Makhachkala

    Tehran

    Tikhoretsk

    Samsun

    Atyrau

    Neka Port

    Tuapse

    A. C. G.

    Balti

    c

    Sea

    Primorsk

    Kurmangazy

    VentspilsButing

    Mega Structure

    Constanta

    Azerbaijan’s Crude Oil Export Routes

    8

  • May 2008

    9

    OIL CONCENTRATION IN THE BLACK SEAAND THE BOSPORUS STRAITS

    TRANSBALKAN PIPELINE B.V.HELPE – THRAKI A.E.

  • May 2008Balance of crude oil flow shipped through the Black Sea and the Bosporus Straits during 2007(Million Metric Tons)

    Youzhnaya OzereevkaNovorossiysk

    Tuapse

    Georgian Ports

    Youzny

    Feodosiya

    Total Crude Oil Shipped105.8

    10

    Legend32,6 / 32 – Actually mln tons shipped in 2007 / Terminal throughput capacity mln tons / year

    10

  • May 2008

    11

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160

    0

    2,000

    4,000

    6,000

    8,000

    10,000

    12,000

    1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

    Tankers

    HazardousCargo

    No. of Tankers Million tons of hazardous cargo

    Source: Turkish Marine Research Foundation

    Number of Tankers and Volume of Hazardous Cargo (Crude oil + Products) Transiting the Bosporus Straits

  • May 2008

    12Source: Inchcape Shipping Services-Turkey

    5.2

    10.7

    16.918.6

    12.3

    3.5

    6.94.9

    6.44.3

    2.13.4

    10.812.0

    8.0

    2.64.2

    7.5

    11.210.0

    3.3

    6.3 5.73.1

    5.4

    3.2

    7.9

    9.5

    11.4

    5.5

    3.1

    5.1

    3.5

    4.5

    3.3

    1.7

    3.0

    8.7

    9.6

    8.1

    2.7

    4.1

    5.6

    10.7

    7.8

    2.5

    5.5 5.8

    2.9

    4.5

    0123456789

    10111213141516171819202122232425262728293031

    Oct.03

    Nov.03

    Dec.03

    Jan.04

    Feb.04

    Oct.04

    Nov.04

    Dec.04

    Jan.05

    Feb.05

    Oct.05

    Nov.05

    Dec.05

    Jan.06

    Feb.06

    Oct.06

    Nov.06

    Dec.06

    Jan.07

    Feb.07

    Oct.07

    Nov.07

    Dec.07

    Jan.08

    Feb.08

    Days

    Actual Monthly Average Tanker Delays in the Straits - Winters(Net waiting time of tankers > 200 m LOA passing in transit - Round trip)

    S/B DelaysN/B Delays

    20,3 d

    9,1 d

    13,5 d

    Traffic system improvements applied in the Straits since Nov. 2004

    13,3 d 9 d

  • May 2008

    13

    BYPASSING ALTERNATIVES AND

    THE BURGAS – ALEXANDROUPOLISOIL PIPELINE PROJECT

    TRANSBALKAN PIPELINE B.V.HELPE – THRAKI A.E.

  • May 2008

    14

    BLACK SEA CRUDE OIL EXPORT PIPELINE ALTERNATIVES

    A. Odessa – Brody –Baltic Sea

    B. Constantza –Trieste

    C. Burgas – Flore

    D. Burgas –Alexandroupolis

    E. Kiykoy – Ibrice

    F. Samsun - Cheyhan

  • May 2008

    15

    WHY THE BURGAS – ALEXANDROUPOLIS PIPELINE?

    TRANSBALKAN PIPELINE B.V.HELPE – THRAKI A.E.

  • May 2008

    16

    1. Cost Efficiency2. Diversification of Routings3. Political Risks

    a. Political stability of territoryb. Political support

    4. Technical & Technological Risks5. Environmental Risks6. Viability and Financial Risks

    a. Oil availability and guaranteesb. Legal and economical governmental commitments. c. The transport cost to be financially comparable with

    the existing through the Straits routing.

    CRITERIA FOR SELECTING THE MOST SUITABLE BYPASS ALTERNATIVE

  • May 2008

    Single PointMoorings

    Single PointMoorings Shore FacilitiesShore Facilities

    AlexandroupolisTerminal

    AlexandroupolisTerminal

    BLACKSEA

    Mainline 36“Mainline 36“

    MEDITERRANEAN SEA

    Bulgaria

    Turkey

    Greece

    AbasAlexandroupolis

    APPROVEDAPPROVEDREV.

    SCALE

    SUBCONTRACTOR:

    ENGINEERING CONTRACTOR:

    CONTRACT NO: 94001-2A:

    PROJECT:

    CLIENT:

    0

    PROJECT DRAWING NO SHEET

    DRAWING TITLE:

    DATE ISSUE, SCOPE OF REVISION PREPARED CHECKED

    Joint Venture DEP S.A./THRAKI S.A.

    Burgas-Alexandroupolis Oil Pipeline Project

    2nd Stage Study (Basic Design)

    ILF CONSULTING ENGINEERSArabellastr. 21, D-81925 Munich

    3436 1 of 1

    Pipeline Routes and Facilities Map 1:1.000.000

    II - DW - AL - AL - 010043 - 0

    10.12.01 First Issue (For Presentation of the Project) Buchauer

    approx.1:1 Mio.

    Millim Heinz

    Loading LinesLoading Lines

    Pumpstation 2 of Alternative A

    Pumpstation 2 of Alternative A

    Burgas

    Burgas Marine FacilitiesAlternative A/B1

    Burgas Marine FacilitiesAlternative A/B1

    Burgas Terminal Alternative B3

    Burgas Terminal Alternative B3

    Burgas Terminal Alternative A/B1

    Burgas Terminal Alternative A/B1

    Burgas Marine FacilitiesAlternative B3

    (Single Point Moorings)

    Burgas Marine FacilitiesAlternative B3

    (Single Point Moorings)

    Pumpstation 2 of Alternatives B1/B3Pumpstation 2 of

    Alternatives B1/B3

    Route AlternativeB1/B3

    Route AlternativeB1/B3

    Route ARoute A

    Virsini

    17

    BURGAS – ALEXANDROUPOLIS OIL PIPELINE

    Source: ILF STUDY

  • May 2008

    18

    PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS FOR THROUGHPUT OF 35 MLN TONSBASED ON ILF STUDY, SUBJECT TO CHANGE UPON COMPLETION OF STUDY UPDATING

    Alexandroupolis Tank Farm and Marine Facilities

    Pipeline

    BurgasTank Farm and Marine Facilities

    Capex

    • Main Pipeline Length: 256 ÷ 279 km• Overall Pipeline Length: 280 ÷ 303 km• Pipeline Diameter: 36“• Intermediate Pumpstation

    • Tank Farm Capacity: 450.000 m3 + 2 Swing Tanks x 20.000 m3

    • Marine Facilities: 2 Piers x 2 Berthing Points for Tankers of 150.000 dwt

    • Total CAPEX for Both Countries Including Facilities for 300.000 dwt tankers in Alex/lis:

    • 1 Bln Euros (updated prices for 2007)

    • Tank Farm Capacity: 750.000 m3 + 2 Swing Tanks x 20.000 m3

    • Marine Facilities: 2 SPMs x Accommodating 2 Tankers of 300.000 dwt each

  • May 2008

    19

    PROJECT BACKGROUND1993-1994 Athens • Concept of the Burgas – Alexandroupolis

    Project by the late N. Gregoriadis - Establishment of THRAKI S.A, which is the initiator and promoter of the project..

    Feb. 1998 Athens • Establishment of the J/ V HELPE S.A. – THRAKI S.A., the Greek participant in the project.

    Sep. 2000 Moscow • Establishment of the Project’s Trilateral Working Committee among Bulgaria, Greece and Russia.

    Jan. 2002 Project Studies • Extensive studies completed by ILF Consulting Engineers.

    Jan. 2003 Athens • Signing of a Political Memorandum among Bulgaria and Greece.

    Nov. 2004 Athens • Political Memorandum initialed among Bulgaria, Greece and Russia.

    Jan. 2005 Moscow • Legal and economical transit framework initially agreed.

    • Group of Initiating Companies (GIC) created.

    Apr. 2005 Sofia • Russia, Bulgaria and Greece signed a Memorandum on cooperation.

    Sep. 2006 Athens • Russia, Bulgaria and Greece signed a Trilateral Declaration of Cooperation.

    Mar. 2007 Athens • Russia, Bulgaria and Greece signed an Intergovernmental Agreement.

    6 Feb. 2008 Amsterdam • Incorporation of the International Project Company of the Project “Transbalkan Pipeline B.V.” in Neterlands.

  • May 2008

    20

    NEXT STEPS OF THE TRANSBALKAN PIPELINE BV

    • Updating of the Project’s Studies and its time schedule

    • Preparation and signing of the Host Government Agreements

    • Licensing

    • Financing

    • Construction

  • May 2008

    21

    – Pipeline Consortium Burgas-Alexandroupolis LtdGazprom NeftRosneftTransneft

    RUSSIAN SIDE( 51 % )

    BULGARIAN SIDE( 24.5 % )

    GREEK SIDE( 24.5 % )

    JSC Pipeline Burgas-Alexandroupolis BGBulgargazTechnoexportstroy

    HELPE – THRAKI A.E.Burgas-Alexandroupolis Oil Pipeline

    Hellenic Petroleum S.A.Latsis Group ( 23,5% )Prometheus Gas Group

    Greek State ( 1% )

    TRANSBALKAN PIPELINE BV SHAREHOLDERS

    Kazakhstan’s Crude Oil Export RoutesBLACK SEA �CRUDE OIL EXPORT PIPELINE ALTERNATIVESBURGAS – ALEXANDROUPOLIS OIL PIPELINEPROJECT CHARACTERISTICS FOR THROUGHPUT OF 35 MLN TONS�BASED ON ILF STUDY, SUBJECT TO CHANGE UPON COMPLETION OF STUDY UPDATING�PROJECT BACKGROUNDNEXT STEPS OF THE �TRANSBALKAN PIPELINE BV