the development of 6mev heavy ion beam probe system in lhd
TRANSCRIPT
The development of6MeV Heavy Ion Beam Probe
System in LHDA. Shimizu, T. Ido, M. Nishiura, S. Nakamura1, H. Nakano, S. Ohshima2,Y. Yoshimura, S. Kubo, T. Shimozuma, H. Igami, H. TakahashiM. Yokoyama, S. Kato, A. Nishizawa, Y. Hamadaand LHD Group
National Institute for Fusion Science, Toki, Japan1) Graduated School of Engineering, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan2) Institute of Laser Engineering, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
Introduction
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
History of Heavy Ion Beam Probe (HIBP)
HIBP measurements in cathod arc PlasmaR. L. Hickok
toroidal currentin ST-tokamak (30 keV) T10 (300 keV)
TJ-II (200 keV)TMX ISX-B (160 keV)
NBT (40 keV)
CHS (200 keV)
JIPP-TIIU (500 keV)
TEXT (500 keV) TEXT-U (2 MeV)
LHD-HIBP(6 MeV)
LHD-HIBP should be the most challenging project in plasma diagnostics.
•Highest Probing Beam Energy•Non axis symmetric magnetic field configuration
JFT-2M (500 keV)NIFS Activity
Outline
•Principle of HIBP
•LHD-HIBP*Requirements*Tandem Energy Analyzer
•Results*Potential profile*Temporal change of potential*Fluctuation measurement of potential
•Summary
Principle of HIBPInjected Beam Energy: E0(Primary Beam, Au+)
Detected Beam Energy: Es(Secondary Beam, Au2+)
Energy deference corresponds to plasma potential
Es – E0 = eφ
Secondary Beam Current Intensity~ Plasma density
( path integral effect is included )
Requirements for LHD-HIBP
MrBEbeam /~ 22
1, The acceleration energy of HIBP,
In LHD, Bt ~ 3 T, r ~ 0.6 m
In large sized device, very large acceleration energy and heavy ion is needed
Ebeam ~ 6 MeV for Au+(197)
2, If we would like to measure 1V fluctuation, extremely high resolution(10-6) is required. Parallel 30 degree energy analyzer has been traditionally used, for its second order focusing of injection angle.
3, For the long orbit length inside of plasma, strong beam attenuationis predicted.
B: Magnetic field strengthr: minor radiusM: mass of beam
Is / I0 ~ 10-5, when ne ~ 1 x 1019 m-3As a sensitive detector, MCP is used.
6MeV Tandem Accelerator
LHDTandem energy analyzer
Two sweepersto control 3-dimensional beam orbit in non axisymmetricconfiguration. This concept is tested in CHS
LHD-HIBP system
~5 m
Observable region
Tandem Energy Analyzer
Beamθ1
θ21st stage
2nd stage
Ordinal type of 30 degree parallel plate analyzer requires high voltage of ~1 MV. Not realistic.
We use tandem energy analyzer to reduce required voltage to 120kV.
Second order focusing is realized
Mea
sure
dB
eam
ene
rgy
LHD-HIBP
Incident Angle (Degree)
Y. Hamada, et al., Rev. Sci. Instrm., 68 (1997) 2020
θ1
Ion -root
electron -root
Observed potential profilesDuring ECH,
Er = - grad φ > 0 : electron-root.
As the density increases,Er changes to negative in ρ < 0.4 : ion-rootA
A
B C D E
F
BC
D
E
F
Negative Palsies observed in LHD
0
0.5
1
0 0.4 0.8
φ (k
V)
t (ms)
τ = 26μs
τ = 73 μs
A
B
An expanded view of a pulse
4
3
2
1
0
Pote
ntia
l (kV
)
2.42.22.01.81.61.41.2Time (sec)
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
ne (10
19m-3)
NBI#2 NBI#3
ECH
Potential (kV)
ne
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
Pot
entia
l (kV
)
1.901.881.861.841.821.80Time (sec)
Repetitive Transition
Bell Hill
• Potential Fluctuation like pulse is observed in LHD. It is similar to CHS pulsation.
• Typical time constant of potential change is faster than energy confinement time.
• Pulse depth is less than in CHS
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
Pote
ntia
l (kV
)
1.8501.8491.8481.8471.8461.845Time (sec)
τ = 90 μs
τ = 500 μs
Pulsation in CHS
Low Density High Density
Observation of coherent modes
|φ(fGAM)| ~ Several hundreds VIt is considered to be Geodesic Acoustic Mode (GAM) caused by high energy particle driven mode, such as RSAE.
250
200
150
100
50
0
Freq
uenc
y (k
Hz)
2.01.81.61.41.21.00.8Time (sec)
density ~0.1 x 1019 m-3
NBIECH
Radial profile of the coherent modes
The mode corresponds to GAM frequency
These are considered to be RSAE modes
Large coherence with magnetic probe signal
Summary
● The LHD HIBP starts to operate after researches and development of many components and methods,particularly,
- the tandem parallel plate analyzer to analyze the probingbeam with a high energy resolution (~10-4)
- the control method to manage 3-dimensional beam orbit in non-axisymmetric magnetic field configuration
● Thanks to these efforts, several interesting observations have been already made, such as, the potential profile, potential change in microsecond range, coherent mode fluctuations, and their radial profiles in density range of 1018 m-3.
● LHD HIBP can be the most ambitious and challenging trial as diagnostics for large-scale plasma devices.
-5
0
5
10
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
Er 0.5-0.6sEr 0.8-0.9sEr 1.2-1.3sEr 2.0-2.1sEr 2.4-2.5s
Er
(kV
/m)
rho
#81079 Calc. Result
Comparison between Experiment and Simulation
Experiment Neoclassical Theory
Neoclassical simulation roughly agrees with the experimental results in core region.
-5
0
5
10
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
0.4 - 0.5 s0.8 - 0.9 s1.2 - 1.3 s2.0 - 2.1 s2.4 - 2.5 s
Er (k
V/m
)
ρ
#81079 Measured with HIBP
6
4
2
076543210
Time (sec)
-200
-150
-100
-50
0
Ip (KA
)
#81420
Sec
onda
ry
Bea
m C
urre
nt (a
.u.)
Secondary Beam Current
Toroidal Shift
Potential (Vertical shift)
Plasma DSP ON
Sweeper Voltage
Real Time Feedback Control
When the large toroidal current conducts, the beam strongly shifts to toroidal direction, so we cannot detect the secondary current because of exceeding.
Real time feed back control of beam by using sweep system may be required.
Position Sweeping Operation
Real Time Feedback Control with DSP
DSP real time feed back system is now being developed.
•non linear control•real time control•flexible system•C Language programming
In test stand, up to 100 Hz perturbations can be canceled out.Secondary Beam Current
Toroidal Shift
Potential (Vertical shift)
Plasma DSP ON
Sweeper Voltage
P control is used. By using PI control, feed back control will be improved.
Analog Signal Operation
Digital Signal Operation
Can HIBP be installed to ITER?
A. V. Melnikov, L. G. Eliseev, Review of Scientific Instruments 70, 951, 1999
Temporal change of the potential by ECHRax=3.6m, Bt=1.5T,ECH : on-axis heating (1.0 – 1.5 s)The plasma is produced and sustained by NBI.HIBP : Wbeam=1.5MeV , The sample volume is near the magnetic axis.
The increase in the potential tends to related to the increase in Te.
0
2
4
6
2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5
0.945s1.3s
Te(k
eV)
Radius(m)
#70222
0
2
4
6
2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5
0.945s1.3s
Te(k
eV)
Radius(m)
#70224
0
0.5
1
1.5
0 0.5 1 1.5 2
#70220#70222#70224
n e (1019
m-3
)
Time(sec)
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
0 0.5 1 1.5 2
#70220#70222#70224
Pot
entia
l(kV
)
Time(sec)
ECH
NBI
Bt=1.5T,Eb=1.5MeV,Rax=3.6m
Negative Ion source
・Target sputtering Au- ion sourceControl Box
Negative ion source,pre accelerator,sector magnet
Negative ion source
・Au- ion is pre-accelerated to 50kV, and injected to the tandem accelerator
・Produced current is ~ 20μA
Tandem Accelerator
High Voltage Terminal
Column
Chamber of accelerator
Accelerator tube
Au+Au-
High frequency wave generator
・By using tandem accelerator, we can generate 6MeV beam with the voltage of 3 MV・Very stable voltage is needed to measure the plasma potential. (10-5 ~ 10-4)
Gas cell
Beam Control System①③⑨⑪Steerer
②④⑧⑩QuadrupoleLens
⑥Beam Profile Monitor
⑦4.8m Cylindrical Deflector
⑤Charge Separator
Beam Position
Beam Focus
Select Au+ from Aun+
⑬⑭8 pole electrical deflector
Control of injection and ejection angle of beam
Beam Attenuation in LHD
•• Secondary beam intensity Secondary beam intensity attenuates 5 ~ 9 times by attenuates 5 ~ 9 times by neutrals (Hneutrals (H22) in the edge ) in the edge region and impurity ions region and impurity ions (C(C6+6+) in the core plasma.) in the core plasma.
•• But the calculated secondary But the calculated secondary beam intensity is still one beam intensity is still one order of magnitude higher order of magnitude higher than the experimental one. than the experimental one. We found MCP detection We found MCP detection efficiency 0.1~0.5efficiency 0.1~0.5 (Good (Good agreement!!)agreement!!)