the context of parental migration and the self-rated health of children in ghana and nigeria v....
TRANSCRIPT
The context of parental migration and the self-rated health of children in Ghana and Nigeria
V. Cebotari, V. Mazzucato & M. Siegel27 November, 2015
Definitions
• Transnational families - when parents migrate internationally and children are left in the origin country to be raised by a caregiver.
Parents – biological parents
Caregiver – the person responsible for the day-to-day care of the child. This can be the other parent, an extended family member or a non-kin member.
Aim• A. To investigate the relationship between
different contexts of parental absence and child health • We do this by looking at parental migration in combination
with extraordinary family circumstances such as divorce and parental death.
• B. To assess the complexity of life of children left-behind in relation to health• How often children change caregiver, remittances, who is the
parent that migrates and who is the caregiver
Transnational and migration studies• The literature points to: • Difference between maternal and paternal migration• Importance of who the caregiver is• The role of remittances
[Dreby, 2007; Fresnoza-Flot 2009; Schmalzbauer 2004; Parreñas 2005]
Gaps• Qualitative transnational studies: no reference group • Not all transnational characteristics are investigated• Primarily based on adult/caregiver assessments• Double separation• migration + marital dissolution• migration + parental death
• Hardly any comparative studies [Graham & Jordan 2011]
• Focus on L. America and Asia – no African cases.
Internal vs international
Ghana and Nigeria
• Children with parents away (no orphans):• 38% Ghana (GDHS, 2008)• 21% Nigeria (NDHS, 2008)
• The existence and widespread practice of child fostering and social parenthood• No guilt feelings on the part of parents• Children not/less stigmatized by peers/society• Child fostering may be preferred choice
[Coe, 2008; Bledsoe & Sow, 2011]
Data and sample
• 2 twin surveys:• Ghana: N= 2,760; Nigeria: N= 2,168
• High out migration areas• Ghana: the Greater Accra region, Kumasi, Sunyani,
Cape Coast• Nigeria: Ife, Ibadan
• A stratified sampling procedure of junior/senior, public/private and high/low quality schools
Self-rated health
On a scale from 1 to 5 [1 = not good to 5 = very good], how would you rate your own health?
Non-migrant
Internal: together
Abroad: together
Internal: divorced
Abroad: divorced
Internal: deceased
Abroad: deceased
3.7
3.8
3.9
4
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
Ghana
Non-migrant
Internal: together
Abroad: together
Internal: divorced
Abroad: divorced
Internal: deceased
Abroad: deceased
4.15
4.2
4.25
4.3
4.35
4.4
4.45
4.5
4.55
4.6
Nigeria
Complexity of children’s life-1
• Location of the migrant parent and the type of separation: non-migrant, internal/together, internal/divorced, inter’l/together, inter’l/divorced, internal/death, inter’l death.
• Children with parents away and divorced are likely to report decreased health.
• Which migrant parent is absent and who is the caregiver: non-migrant, father away/mother carer, mother away/father carer, both away
• Maternal migration negatively affects child health• This would not be the case when the mothers are the caregivers
Complexity of children’s life-2
• The stability of the child raising arrangement: non-migrant/zero changes, non-migrant/often changes, migrant/zero changes, migrant/often changes
• Frequent changes in caregiver are more likely to decrease child health
• Remittances: non-migrant, migrant/yes, migrant/no
• Children living transnationally and receiving remittances are more likely to have better health
Other measurements• Child characteristics• Age, gender
• family characteristics• Education mother, education father, total nr. of children, younger
siblings,
• Family Process• Quality of child/parent relationship
• Living Conditions• Subjective living conditions, housing conditions
• School type• Low/high quality, public/private
Analytical strategy
• Ordinal probit models• Step-wise inclusion of controls
Results - type of absence
Ghana Nigeria
Location parent(s) and the type of separation
Non-migrant parents - - - - - -
Parent(s) away internally: together -0.05 -0.04 -0.03 -0.16 -0.12 -0.14
Parent(s) away internationally: together 0.08 0.03 0.04 -0.08 -0.08 -0.04
Parents(s) away internally: divorced/separated
-0.18* -0.14 -0.13 -0.31*** -0.33** -0.37***
Parents(s) away internationally: divorced/separated
-0.23* -0.27* -0.27* -0.34* -0.40** -0.36*
Parent away internally: parent deceased -0.15 0.00 0.01 -0.17 -0.21 -0.23
Child age (years) -0.06*** -0.05** -0.06** -0.05*** -0.05*** -0.05**
Child is girl -0.04 -0.05 -0.05 0.02 0.03 0.02
Mother’s education secondary or more 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.06
Father’s education secondary or more 0.10 0.10 -0.01 0.02
Nr. of siblings living with the child -0.02 -0.02 -0.02 -0.02
The child is living with younger siblings 0.05 0.06 -0.02 -0.03
Living conditions are better 0.16** 0.15** 0.37*** 0.35***
Number of People per rooms in the house -0.00 -0.01 -0.06* -0.08**
Distant relationship with parent(s)/caregiver -0.15 -0.15 -0.03 -0.05
Low–quality schools -0.12 -0.01
Private schools -0.13* -0.21**
Results – complexity of children’s life
Ghana NigeriaMigration status and the caregiver Non-migrant parents - - Father abroad, mother caregiver 0.10 0.04
Mother abroad, father caregiver 0.06 -0.42*
Both parents abroad, other carer 0.03 -0.08
Stability of the care arrangement Non-migrant parents: changed never
- -
Non-migrant parents: changed caregiver > 1
-0.26** -0.19
Parent(s) away: never changed caregiver
0.06 0.08
Parent(s) away: changed caregiver > 1
-0.07 -0.29*
Remittances Non-migrant parents: - -
Parents away internationally: yes -0.06 -0.10
Parents away internationally: no -0.06 -0.17
Other Findings
• Older children -> decreased health• Good living and housing conditions -> better health• Children in private schools -> decreased health
Conclusions• It is important to distinguish between the contexts of parental
absence in relation to child health • The transnational life of children is not unidimensional and
different family arrangements affect children differently and not necessarily in a more negative way• Family unity is key• Stability of the caregiver makes a difference• Family norms around child upbringing are important• Remittances are not crucial
• Children’s perceptions of their own well-being should be considered more in policy responses.
THANK YOU!