the comcec best practices and case studies in financial
TRANSCRIPT
©2014 Deloitte Consulting
March, 27 2014 Ankara
COMCEC Financial Inclusion in the COMCEC Region: Institutional Framework, Main Barriers and Policy Recommendations Yücel Ersöz, Deloitte Consulting, Partner İrem Aktaş, Deloitte Consulting, Manager
©2014 Deloitte Consulting
Outline
«Enhancing Financial Inclusion in the COMCEC Countries» Report
The COMCEC Country Clustering Methodology
Barriers to Financial inclusion in the COMCEC Countries
Policy Alternatives and Initiatives for all the COMCEC Countries
The COMCEC Financial Inclusion Framework
Ease of Implementation in the COMCEC Countries
©2014 Deloitte Consulting
Outline
«Enhancing Financial Inclusion in the COMCEC Countries» Report
The COMCEC Country Clustering Methodology
Barriers to Financial inclusion in the COMCEC Countries
Policy Alternatives and Initiatives for all the COMCEC Countries
The COMCEC Financial Inclusion Framework
Ease of Implementation in the COMCEC Countries
©2014 Deloitte Consulting
«Enhancing Financial Inclusion in the COMCEC Countries» Report
4
• The COMCEC Office & Deloitte Consulting
• Aimed to Define Alternative Ways to Enhance Financial Inclusion
• Desktop Research, Literature Review, Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) and Deloitte Analysis
• Report’s Outline:
• Conceptual Framework for Financial Inclusion and Recent Developments in the International Agenda
• A Snapshot of financial inclusion at a Glance in the COMCEC Countries
• Reviewing Institutional Framework for Financial Inclusion in/among the COMCEC Countries
• Identifying Barriers on Enhancing Financial Inclusion and Introducing Measures for Reducing Financially Excluded Population in the COMCEC Countries
• Conclusion and Recommendations
©2014 Deloitte Consulting
Outline
5
«Enhancing Financial Inclusion in the COMCEC Countries» Report
The COMCEC Country Clustering Methodology
Barriers to Financial inclusion in the COMCEC Countries
Policy Alternatives and Initiatives for all the COMCEC Countries
The COMCEC Financial Inclusion Framework
Ease of Implementation in the COMCEC Countries
©2014 Deloitte Consulting
The COMCEC Country Clustering Methodology
6
Although majorly located in the MENA (Middle East and North Africa) region, rather than geographical characteristics, below hypothesises have been considered as a base for the clustering methodology: • The COMCEC member states may be experiencing different levels on their financial
inclusion and/or, • The COMCEC member states may face different barriers against financial inclusion
and/or, • The COMCEC member states may need different financial inclusion frameworks and
strategies
The clustering methodology is structured on a “roadmap/framework-to-address a particular financial inclusion barrier” approach. The clustered countries may have different financial inclusion barriers per-se, however the methodology allow us understand at what “stage” the particular country is in its financial inclusion framework. Clustered countries only involve the COMCEC countries; therefore the comparison should be made on a “relativity” point of view. In other words, not all Cluster 3 countries should not be considered as “developed” countries but relatively developed in comparison with Cluster 1 and 2 countries.
Source: Deloitte Resources
©2014 Deloitte Consulting
The COMCEC Country Clustering (1/3)
7
Afghanistan
Albania
Algeria
Azerbaijan
Bangladesh
Benin
Burkina Faso
Cameroon
Chad
Comoros
Egypt, Arab Rep.
Gabon Guinea
Indonesia
Iraq
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Lebanon
Malaysia
Mali
Mauritania
Morocco
Mozambique
Niger
Nigeria Pakistan
Qatar Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Sierra Leone
Sudan Tajikistan
Togo
Tunisia
Turkey
Uganda
United Arab Emirates
Yemen, Rep.
3
30
200 2000 20000 200000
Dom
estic
cre
dit t
o pr
ivat
e se
ctor
( (%
of G
DP)
GNI Per capita, Atlas Method (current USD)
Bubble Size: Account at a formal financial institution (% age 15+)
Source: Deloitte Resources
©2014 Deloitte Consulting
The COMCEC Country Clustering (2/3)
8
The breakdown of parameters per clusters is illustrated below:
GNI per capita, Atlas Method (current USD) Domestic credit to private sector (%GDP)
Cluster 1 0- $1.300 Low Size
Cluster 2 $1.301 - $8.200 Average Size
Cluster 3 $8.201 > Average to High Size
Source: Deloitte Resources
©2014 Deloitte Consulting
The COMCEC Country Clustering (3/3)
9 Source: Deloitte Resources
Cluster 1 2 3 Financial Inclusion Stage
Birth: Learning Stage Youth: Investing/ Consuming Stage
Maturity: Saving Stage
Countries
Afghanistan Bangladesh
Benin Burkina Faso
Chad Comoros
Côte d'Ivoire Gambia Guinea
Guinea-Bissau Guyana
Kyrgyz Republic Maldives
Mali Mozambique
Niger Palestine
Sierra Leone Somalia
Suriname Tajikistan
Togo Uganda
Uzbekistan
Albania Algeria
Brunei Darussalam Cameroon
Djibouti Egypt Gabon
Indonesia Iran Iraq
Jordan Libya
Mauritania Morocco Nigeria
Pakistan Senegal Sudan Tunisia
Turkmenistan Yemen
Azerbaijan Bahrain
Kazakhstan Kuwait
Lebanon Malaysia
Oman Qatar
Saudi Arabia Turkey
United Arab Emirates
General Characteristics based on Clustering Criteria
• Relatively low credit penetration • Relatively low account penetration • Low income level
• Low-to-medium credit penetration
• Medium level account penetration
• Low-to-medium income level
• Relatively high credit penetration • Relatively higher foreign players in the financial
markets • Relatively high account penetration • Adequate income level • Existence of natural resources • Developing private sector with financing needs • Balance of repayments remain deficit • High trade economy
©2014 Deloitte Consulting
Outline
10
«Enhancing Financial Inclusion in the COMCEC Countries» Report
The COMCEC Country Clustering Methodology
Barriers to Financial inclusion in the COMCEC Countries
Policy Alternatives and Initiatives for all the COMCEC Countries
The COMCEC Financial Inclusion Framework
Ease of Implementation in the COMCEC Countries
©2014 Deloitte Consulting 11
Question: What are the most important barriers against financial inclusion
particular to your country?
Barriers to Financial inclusion in the COMCEC Countries
©2014 Deloitte Consulting
Barriers to Financial inclusion in the COMCEC Countries
12 Source: Deloitte Resources
Cluster 1 Countries
Major Barriers
1. Low, unpredictable and irregular income level
2. Weak private sector 3. Lack of collateral for lending 4. Inadequate (physical) access to
financial sector providers 5. Low financial literacy& awareness 6. Low need for a financial product or
service 7. Poor financial and legal infrastructure 8. Non-profitable financial market
(inadequate business case) for the local and global suppliers
9. Existence of shadow economy
Cluster 2 Countries
1. Inadequate lending/financing strategies, lack of suitable products
2. Inadequate access to financial system 3. Mild competition in the financial
markets 4. Cost concerns 5. Inadequate qualified personnel for the
financial sector 6. Improvement needs for financial
infrastructure
Cluster 3 Countries
1. Voluntarily excluded segments (cultural and religious)
2. Involuntarily excluded segments (women, young population, immigrants)
3. Improvement needs for financial infrastructure
©2014 Deloitte Consulting
Outline
13
«Enhancing Financial Inclusion in the COMCEC Countries» Report
The COMCEC Country Clustering Methodology
Barriers to Financial inclusion in the COMCEC Countries
Policy Alternatives and Initiatives for all the COMCEC Countries
The COMCEC Financial Inclusion Framework
Ease of Implementation in the COMCEC Countries
©2014 Deloitte Consulting
Policy Alternatives and Initiatives for all the COMCEC Countries
14
1. Establishment of National Financial Inclusion Strategies
2. Increasing Financial Literacy 3. Realization of Financial Consumer Protection 4. Utilization of Mobile Financial Services 5. Microfinance and Microcredits 6. Agent Banking 7. Islamic Finance
It is important to note that not all of the policy alternatives are applicable to all of the COMCEC member states, and there is no single strategy that could be applicable to all of them. Therefore, there is no single recipe for increasing financial inclusion levels.
Common Strategies for Financial Inclusion
Source: Deloitte Resources
©2014 Deloitte Consulting 15
Question: What should be the primary steps towards financial inclusion particular
to your country?
Question 2
©2014 Deloitte Consulting
Outline
16
«Enhancing Financial Inclusion in the COMCEC Countries» Report
The COMCEC Country Clustering Methodology
Barriers to Financial inclusion in the COMCEC Countries
Policy Alternatives and Initiatives for all the COMCEC Countries
The COMCEC Financial Inclusion Framework
Ease of Implementation in the COMCEC Countries
©2014 Deloitte Consulting
The COMCEC Financial Inclusion Framework
17
Financial Inclusion Stage 0 Cluster 1 Countries
1. Position financial inclusion as part of the local government’s agenda 2. Increase financial literacy through government-led programmes 3. Replace cash with non-cash methods 4. Invest in legal and financial infrastructure 5. Promote microfinance to introduce “lending” culture 6. Ease Documentation Requirements
Major Barriers Roadmap
THE COMCEC FINANCIAL INCLUSION FRAMEWORK
1. Low, unpredictable and irregular income level 2. Weak private sector 3. Lack of collateral for lending 4. Inadequate (physical) access to financial sector providers 5. Low financial literacy& awareness 6. Low need for a financial product or service 7. Poor financial and legal infrastructure 8. Non-profitable financial market (inadequate business case) for the local and
global suppliers 9. Existence of shadow economy
Financial Inclusion Stage 1/ Priority: Corporate Clients Cluster 2 Countries
1. Increase financial education 2. Improve lending strategies 3. More SME finance/advisory through government-led programmes 4. Promote cost-effective financial services 5. Boost the competition in the financial markets
1. Inadequate lending/financing strategies, lack of suitable products 2. Inadequate access to financial system 3. Mild competition in the financial markets 4. Cost concerns 5. Inadequate qualified personnel for the financial sector 6. Improvement needs for financial infrastructure
Financial Inclusion Stage 2 / Priority: Corporate + Individual Clients Cluster 3 Countries
1. Increase financial capabilities 2. Improve saving strategies 3. Strengthen Islamic Finance 4. Promote affluent, private banking and wealth management strategies 5. Promote policies towards financially excluded segments 6. Promote advanced lending products 7. Decrease barriers to market entry
1. Voluntarily excluded segments (cultural and religious) 2. Involuntarily excluded segments (women, young population, immigrants) 3. Improvement needs for financial infrastructure
Source: Deloitte Resources
©2014 Deloitte Consulting
Outline
18
«Enhancing Financial Inclusion in the COMCEC Countries» Report
The COMCEC Country Clustering Methodology
Barriers to Financial inclusion in the COMCEC Countries
Policy Alternatives and Initiatives for all the COMCEC Countries
The COMCEC Financial Inclusion Framework
Ease of Implementation in the COMCEC Countries
©2014 Deloitte Consulting
Ease of Implementation in the COMCEC Countries
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Res
ourc
es to
impl
emen
t pol
icy
alte
rnat
ives
Bubble size is the effectiveness of the policy alternative on the performance of financial inclusion
Financial Literacy
National Financial Inclusion Strategy
Mobile Financial Services
Islamic Finance
Microfinance
Financial Customer Protection
Time needed to see the effect of each policy on the performance of financial inclusion
Agent Banking
Resources to implement policy alternatives: Costs attained to each policy alternative which comprises tangible costs associated with resource (e.g. capital, human resource, etc.) are ranked on a scale of 1 to 10-10 being the highest. This item also considers involvement from different shareholders such as government, governmental bodies, non-governmental organization like financial institutions, non-financial institutions and NGOs. Time needed to see the effect of each policy: Total time that should be allocated in terms of both development and implementation of a particular policy. Time is ranked on a scale of 1 to 10-10 being the longest. Effectiveness of the policy: Total impact and effectiveness of a particular policy alternative on the performance of financial inclusion. Effectiveness is ranked on a scale of 1 to 10-10 being the highest.
Source: Deloitte Resources 19
©2014 Deloitte Consulting
Concluding Remarks
20
Not all of the policy alternatives are applicable to all of the COMCEC member states, and there is no single strategy that could be applicable to all of them. Therefore, there is no single recipe for increasing financial inclusion levels. However, depending on the past performance and maturity levels of the financial markets in each country, the COMCEC countries would be advised to develop a strategic roadmap and feasibility towards increasing financial inclusion, with a prioritization of these policy alternatives. Such a decision would be meaningless unless member states see the cost – benefit equation of the policy alternatives.
Source: Deloitte Resources
©2014 Deloitte Consulting
Deloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, a UK private company limited by guarantee, and its network of member firms, each of which is a legally separate and independent entity. Please see www.deloitte.com/about or www.deloitte.com/de/UeberUns for a detailed description of the legal structure of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited and its member firms. Deloitte provides audit, tax, consulting, and financial advisory services to public and private clients spanning multiple industries. With a globally connected network of member firms in more than 150 countries, Deloitte brings world-class capabilities and high-quality service to clients, delivering the insights they need to address their most complex business challenges. Deloitte's approximately 200,000 professionals are committed to becoming the standard of excellence. This presentation contains general information only, and none of Deloitte Consulting GmbH or Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited (“DTTL”), any of DTTL’s member firms, or any of the foregoing’s affiliates (collectively the “Deloitte Network”) are, by means of this presentation, rendering accounting, business, financial, investment, legal, tax, or other professional advice or services. This presentation is not a substitute for such professional advice or services, nor should it be used as a basis for any decision or action that may affect your finances or your business. Before making any decision or taking any action that may affect your finances or your business, you should consult a qualified professional adviser. No entity in the Deloitte Network shall be responsible for any loss whatsoever sustained by any person who relies on this presentation. © 2014 Deloitte