the code of terpsichore the dance theory of carlo blasis ... · ture, music and the fine arts, and...
TRANSCRIPT
The Code of TerpsichoreThe Dance Theory of Carlo Blasis:Mechanics as the Matrix of Grace* Gabriele Brandstetter
ABSTRACT: The essay examines both the dances and thedance notation of renowned nineteenth century choreographer
Carlo Blasis. It looks in detail at Blasis’ major treatise TheCode of Terpsichore in an effort to evaluate how Blasis linked ascience of movement to a conception of the body oriented
around the prevailing aesthetics informing all of the fine arts.Identifying Blasis as both a philosopher and a mechanist, thisessay analyzes his approach to teaching basic ballet vocabu-
lary, and in particular the arabesque. Whereas Kleist, with hisMarionettentheater, proposes the puppet as a figure of grace,located somewhere between animal and doll, Blasis brings
together the movement science of mechanics and the descrip-tive theory of grace (as mimesis) in a poetics of the arabesque,a synthesis of elevation and evanescence, which we see whenwe conjure up pictures of nineteenth century Romantic ballet.
Im Tanz muß alles Tanz sein,
also keine Schritte im Walzer,so in der Poesie.Jean Paul
At the turn of the nineteenth century a variety of
scientific disciplines, as well as the arts, were preoc-
cupied with the body, or more specifically, with re-
determining the body’s cultural meaning. In the light
of new discoveries in the fields of medicine, psychol-
ogy, physics and chemistry, the body was no longer
primarily a static object, but an object that was both
in motion and conceptualised into motion in many
respects; an object of research. At the same time the
aporia of the eighteenth century’s aesthetics of
expression became obvious: the contradiction be-
tween bodily discipline and freedom of the subject,
the friction between a discourse of authenticity and a
bodily technique considered ‘‘dance master postur-
ing’’, a subject of reflection for Friedrich Schiller and
Heinrich von Kleist, among others.
The result of this cultural and science-historical
discursive turn was a reconfiguring of representations
of the body in overlapping fields of knowledge: in the
movement sciences (physics and mechanics) for one,
as well as in a descriptive theory of the body in
motion -- a theory of dance.
The choreographer and dance theorist Carlo Blasis
assumed an important role in this constellation. He
can be described as the creator of a new theory of the
body in motion, a theory founded on an experimen-
tal, practical science. Blasis can be said to have
invented ballet as a ‘‘poetic science’’.
In dance historiography Blasis is considered the
founder of the system of movement and aesthetic of
classical ballet; he is the creator of The Code of
Terpsichore (this was the title of his main work, pub-
lished in 1828)1, which has influenced the tradition of
stage dance up until the present day. Blasis, born in
1796, came from a Neapolitan family and was trained
inMarseille as a dancer, choreographer and theorist of
dance. It was not his numerous choreographies,
however, which later made him famous. Rather it was
his theoretical writings on dance that established him
as an authority throughout the European dance scene.
He worked in Paris, London, Milan andMoscow2 and
published in three languages: Italian, French and
English. He was a man of universal education,
knowledgeable in both the sciences and the arts. He
studied mathematics and geometry, as well as anat-
omy, the latter with two of the most important anat-
omy teachers of the age: Sabato de Mauro and
Dutrouille.3 Blasis was also well-versed in architec-
ture, music and the fine arts, and a friend of artists
such as Lorenzo Bortolini, Canova and Thorvaldsen.
The dance historian Oskar Bie accurately charac-
terised the classical-humanist model of education
embodied by Carlo Blasis (although one should of
course bear in mind the slightly ironic tone of Bie’s
Topoi (2005) 24:67-79 � Springer 2005DOI 10.1007/s11245-004-4162-x
description: he favoured the modern expressive dance
of the 1900s.)
Blasis, according to Bie, was a
romantic academic [. . .]. His school is properly mechanistic,his logic none too fantastic, his taste clear: antique andrenaissance statues, a little Giovanni da Bologna mixedwith Canova, Thorvaldsen applied to the populist effect of
the Scala style, art historical education placed into a tab-leau, poured into an arabesque.4
Oskar Bie names precisely those paradigms that, in
combination, make Blasis’ Code of Terpsichore a
poetics and a theory of dance: mechanics and the
arabesque. Blasis himself delivered the key formula
for this with his demand that the choreographer must
be both a poet and a scientist of movement: ‘‘In short,
a complete Ballet-Master is at once author and
mechanist.’’5
It is worth examining this combination of
mechanics and poetic inspiration, for it places Blasis --
the only other example is Kleist with his Marionet-
tentheater6 -- in the avant-garde of a change in the
representational theory of the body in motion which
is significant for modernity. Blasis worked on mod-
elling the body according to the ideals of classical
beauty (but after Canova rather than Winckelmann).
This ideal owed its aesthetic to the eighteenth cen-
tury7, but its application to motion was new. How
could the sculptural ideal that determined the aes-
thetic of the body in the eighteenth century be applied
to dance? How could one perform its purity of line,
clarity and balance of proportion in each movement,
in the dance dynamic? This problem (the inverse of
the Laocoon situation) was not, historically speaking,
entirely new to an aesthetics of dance. The represen-
tative ballet of the Baroque in particular was founded
on such geometric principles. Whereas there, how-
ever, the Cartesian principles of the division of space
and the requirements of courtly representation placed
ballet in approximately the same category as archi-
tecture, Blasis was faced with the question of how to
combine the achievements of eighteenth century
dance theatre -- the dramatic ‘‘ballet d’action’’8 -- and
the typical nineteenth century concept of a moving
artistic body trained to virtuosity. Jean Georges
Noverre, an advocate of the authenticity of bodily
expression and the dramatic effect of ballet d’action,
had condemned every performance of virtuoso dance
art: ‘‘renounce cabrioles, entrechats and over-compli-
cated steps; abandon grimaces to study sentiments,
artless graces and expression’’.9 Now, some 50 years
later, Carlo Blasis became both systematiser and
historiographer of the dance concepts of earlier
epochs. Large parts of his many writings,10 as well as
his most important work The Code of Terpsichore,
deal with different historical styles of dance and their
practitioners; with the history of ‘‘coreodramma’’, of
the pantomime, of courtly dance and the expressive
genre. The most important part of his work, however,
is best characterized by the title he himself gave to the
text which houses it: ‘‘The Code of Terpsichore’’. And
this code -- even though the figure itself is conceived
of as a body sculpture in motion -- is paradoxically
formulated as a script, but not as a dance script. A
dance script notates the pathways and the shapes of
steps, as Feuillet did in the Baroque period.
Blasis, in contrast, developed a script of figures -- an
ABC of poses -- that inscribed the alphabetic character
of dance, of the moving body itself. The decisive
Figure 1. John Weaver, ‘Orchesography’ (1706). Bibl. de l’
Opera, in: Laurence Louppe (ed.) DANSES TRACEES. Des-sins et Notation des Choreographes. Exhibition catalogue. (DisVoir, Paris 1991), p. 27.
68 GABRIELE BRANDSTETTERGABRIELE BRANDSTETTER
characteristic of this theory is that the concepts of
training the body and of choreography (the composi-
tion of ballets) are defined and systematised as a code.
Blasis collected and classified every pose, every step and
every jump rather like an alphabet or a dictionary. And
he described and illustrated the rules for connecting
these elements of movement in a kind of syntax or
grammar of dance. The ‘‘Code of Terpsichore’’ con-
stitutes the first science of moving figures, and it con-
tains the body not as a bearer of signs but as a figure.
But in order to train the body as an artistic figure, a
grounding in geometry and mechanics, as well as an
extensive education in the arts, is required. In his
‘‘New Method of Instruction’’,11 Blasis recommends
that the dancer should educate his taste via the mas-
terpieces of art and sculpture.
A teacher cannot too strongly recommend his scholars tohave incessantly before them those master-pieces of paint-ing and sculpture, which have been saved from the wreck of
antiquity. Those immortal offsprings of genius, thoseenrapturing examples of the beau ideal of the fine arts willconsiderably assist the cultivation of their taste.12
On the one hand, therefore, the dancer should ‘‘sculpt
his body’’ by finding his models in art (rather than in
nature, as was implied in eighteenth century debates
on mimesis, and also in Noverre). On the other hand,
it was absolutely necessary that the founding princi-
ples of a science of movement be rooted in the study
of geometry and the mechanics of the body; in Blasis’
words, a mathematical task, an effort, ‘‘which I may
venture to term mathematical by reason of its preci-
sion’’.13 Blasis states that the figures in the ‘‘Code of
Terpsichore’’ are drawn after nature, but then styled
on two levels:
In order that [the] execution may be correct, I have drawnlines [. . .] over the principal positions of these figures, whichwill give [them] an idea of the exact form they are to placethemselves in, and to figure the different attitudes ofdancing.14
The dancer, the pupil, was supposed to realise these
lines, to project them, as it were, through an imagi-
nary bodily scaffold onto each of his poses and
movements. Blasis suggests a combination of theo-
retical and practical study for the lesson. The teacher
should first describe the figures -- by drawing the lines
-- then explain their geometry and the principles of
mechanics, then the pupils should copy down the
figures, memorise them and finally -- with this struc-
Figure 3. Carlo Blasis, ‘The Code of Terpsichore’ in: CarloBlasis, The Code of Terpsichore, figures 29-31. (see note 1)
Figure 2. ‘Ferrere manuscript’ (1782) in: Marian HannahWinter, The Pre-Romantic Ballet (Pitman, London 1974), p.182.
THE CODE OF TERPSICHORETHE CODE OF TERPSICHORE 69
tural plan in mind -- embody the principles practically
in their exercise:
These lines and figures, drawn upon a large slate and
exposed to the view of a number of scholars, would be soonunderstood and imitated by them [. . .]. The most diligentmight take copies of those figure on small slates, and carry
them with them to study at home, in the same manner as achild, when he begins to spell, studies his horn-book in theabsence of the master.15
Blasis formalised these foundational lines even fur-
ther.
Dance education (correct ‘‘holding’’) and aesthetic
realisation (‘‘a pure taste’’) are the result of geometric
design, the spatial figure of the body and the con-
structive rather than the mimetic implementation of a
movement configuration:
It is necessary that the pupil should study these geometricallines and all their derivates. If he subjects himself to thistask, which I may venture to call mathematical, on account
of its laboriousness, he is certain of holding himself
correctly afterwards, and will show that he received notionsof a pure taste [. . .].16
This approach is remarkable for tying a science of
movement to a conception of the body oriented
around the aesthetic of the fine arts. The dancer is a
machinist and a sculptor, a poet who performs his
own body, all thanks to the reflexive process of the
power of imag[in]ing: imag[in]ing ballet’s mathemat-
ics of the figure into a genuine performance.
But before I address the question of poetics, of a
poetic science of movement, I would like to return to
the construction of the ‘‘Code’’ and its interface with
mechanics.
‘‘I should compose,’’ writes Blasis,
a sort of alphabet of straight lines, comprising all thepositions of the limbs in dancing, giving these lines andtheir respective combinations, their proper geometrical
appellations, viz: perpendiculars, horizontals, obliques,right, acute, and obtuse angles, etc., a language which Ideem almost indispensable in our lessons.17
Blasis’ ‘‘alphabet’’ of lines, of geometric and stereo-
metric figures and the ways in which they are com-
bined by bodies in motion -- the code of dance -- does
indeed require the movement scientist to be a physi-
cist of movement: in other words, a mechanic.
Figure 4. Carlo Blasis, ‘The Code of Terpsichore’, ibid., figures32-34.
Figure 5. Carlo Blasis, ‘The Code of Terpsichore’.
70 GABRIELE BRANDSTETTERGABRIELE BRANDSTETTER
Mechanics, a field of physics, deals with the
movement of bodies under the influence of internal or
external forces. The fundamental concepts of physics
-- space, time, body or mass, force, energy or
acceleration -- are also units of key importance for
dance. In classical antiquity, from the time of Aris-
totle, mechanics was understood as the art of out-
witting nature, diverting things (bodies) by human, by
artificial interference in the natural order of things, by
making things behave contrary to their natural
course. This is achieved by constructing devices,
machines and tools. Mechanics, as an artistic practice,
as a science of motion, thus employs a strategy of
artful knowledge. It is no coincidence that Daedalus --
who built Ariadne’s dance space -- is the embodiment
of this tactical, artful relationship between man and
nature in the space between myth and the history of
technology: Daedalus, who invented the labyrinth
(the prototype of a defensive space as well as the
ur-stage of choreography); Daedalus, the inventor of
the first aeroplane, with which he wished to outwit the
gravity of the human body. Nineteenth century
ballet’s dreams of flight reconfigure the idea of
cheating nature, using the mechanics of the body.
This idea was responsible for the machines of military
and technological history, as well as the theatrical and
illusionary machines of the Baroque and the levita-
tion hinted at by the physical technique of dance. The
combination of ‘‘artful technology’’ and the art of
cheating led, following the discoveries made by optics
and the theories of perspective and perception that
accompanied them, to the art of cheating the eye.18
Blasis’ concept of the ‘‘ballet master as mechanic’’
should be read against this background. At stake is a
practice of knowledge that integrates two particular
related areas of mechanics -- dynamics and kinematics
-- into a science of bodies in motion. Drawing on
these concepts already had a certain tradition in the
eighteenth century: in movement pedagogy on the one
hand, as in the educational doctrines of Pestalozzi
and Basedow, for example; and in the theory of
description on the other -- and here there is also a long
tradition of what is termed ‘‘the science of ceremony’’.
This was how Julius von Rohr titled his compendium
on etiquette at court and how citizens should comport
themselves, for example during a dance at a ball.
A good air is of great importance, namely that one forms anorderly positioning of the body and nice steps, that one
knows how to move the arms daintily and accurately inaccordance with the mathematical and musical rules of artafter the Cadance, so that they are not held too stiffly and
inflexibly, but also without too many gestures and unnec-essary fleeting movements, so that the dancers resemblepuppets.19
The model for education of the body and the science
of its representation was still courtly, following the
example of Baldassare Castiglione’s Il Cortegiano. At
the beginning of the eighteenth century these two
conceptions of the body -- the pedagogical one and
that of the courtier -- were still connected. John
Locke, for example, in his treatise of 1705, Some
Thoughts Concerning Education,20 writes of the sci-
ence of movement that there is, in addition to the
knowledge that can be gained from books, another
type, which is, of course, essential for the gentleman.
‘‘Accomplishments necessary for Gentlemen, to be
allowed, and for which Masters must be had’’.21 This
consists of training the body through dance, not
through fencing and riding, which he considers too
one-sided:22 ‘‘Dancing being that which gives graceful
Motions all the life, and above all things Manliness,
and a becoming Confidence to young Children’’.23
The aim of training the body in dance is ‘‘a perfect
graceful Carriage’’.
In the late eighteenth century the concept of grace
was recast.24 Grace was no longer defined as the
posture of the gentleman -- his habitual self-repre-
sentation (the ‘‘sprezzatura’’ that is casually concealed
behind control of one’s body) -- but was now a
property of the beautiful soul, an expression of the
subject’s freedom:25 with Karl Philipp Moritz and
Schiller for example, and subsequently also in the
aesthetics of dance as an expressive theory with Gas-
paro Angiolini and Jean Georges Noverre.26 Peda-
gogical discourse on the education of the body, on the
other hand, advocated a programme of bodily fitness,
an idea which began to receive criticism around 1800.
Pestalozzi’s concept of education was marked by an
‘‘unholy elementarisation’’, according to Karl von
Rauner.27 Fragmenting the body, drilling it, member
by member, would only bestow, after all, the flexibility
of a puppet on a string. Education specialists after
1800, in contrast, propagated a holistic fitness pro-
gramme -- exercise for body and soul, as it were. And it
is no surprise that at this time a national education
programme was announced, in such texts as Johann
Gottlieb Fichte’s Addresses to the German Nation. The
THE CODE OF TERPSICHORETHE CODE OF TERPSICHORE 71
body model propagated was (still) a classical/classicist
one. Exercises, wrote Fichte, should be ‘‘like those of
the Greeks’’.28 On the whole, however, this was of
course a romantic project for the future, for what was
still lacking was an ‘‘ABC of the art of bodily move-
ment’’. This ABC, according to Fichte,
must first be provided, and for this a man is needed who isequally at home in the anatomy of the human body and in
scientific mechanics, who combines this knowledge with ahigh degree of philosophical ability, and who is thuscapable of inventing in all its perfection that machine whichthe human body is designed to be.29
Carlo Blasis was to be the philosopher and machinist,
the body pedagogue and poet, to systematically
extend this programme into a theory and methodol-
ogy. This, admittedly, did not take the form of a
national programme of education involving gymnas-
tics and exercise, but rather of an haute ecole of bodily
representation in dance: an art form.30 The applica-
tion of mechanical discoveries to the theory of bodily
exercise came into fashion at the end of the eighteenth
century. This manifested itself largely in attempts at
analysing the pull and leverage of movement, such as
those of Christian Ernst Wunsch (a teacher of Hein-
rich von Kleist), or at classifying the mechanical
conditions of certain types of sport, such as those of
Gerhard Ulrich Vieth in his Versuch einer Enzy-
klopadie der Leibesubungen [Attempt at an Encyclo-
paedia of Bodily Exercises].31
In this context Blasis’ theory occupies a special
place. The relationships between directions and forces
in the body -- the effect of those forces that belong to
the field of statics -- are what underpin his research into
movement, not the forces that, mechanically, exert
influence from the outside, such as pull and leverage.
‘‘Statics’’ can be defined as ‘‘the art of balance’’. It
incorporates the rule of equilibrium and the conditions
of those forces that attack the motionless body. Since
Archimedes’ theory of the centre of gravity, statics has
been regarded as a special area of dynamics. Tracing
problems of dynamics back to problems of statics first
became possible with the help of d’Alembert’s princi-
ple (established in 1794 at the Ecole polytechnique in
Paris). This is precisely what happens in Blasis’ theory
of movement. The first textbook to deal systematically
with questions of statics was published in 1824 by
Claude Louis Marie Henri Navier, at approximately
the same time as Blasis’ dance system.
Carlo Blasis’ central reflections on the mechanics
of movement are related to problems of statics. Each
pose, each movement, is constructed with the aim of
establishing perfect control of balance. The lines that
Blasis draws onto the figures in his code are, above
all, perpendicular lines. And thus the sentence that
Blasis quotes at the very beginning of his ‘‘New
Method of Instruction’’, which functions as the motto
of his theory and aesthetics -- ‘‘Nulla dies sine linea’’32
-- takes on a double meaning. In a painterly sense it
implies the sculptural line of the figure, but also the
perpendicular line of the centre of gravity. ‘‘Endeav-
our to hold your body in perfect equilibrium’’, he
instructs, ‘‘never let it depart from the perpendicular
line […]’’.33 It is this kinetic theme, the question of the
centre of gravity and the perpendicular line, that
connects Blasis’ theory and practice of dance move-
ment with Heinrich von Kleist’s model of grace,
moving between human performance of the body and
the mechanics of marionette movement. The vis
motrix follows the principle of gravity -- in the
movement of the pendulum: ‘‘Each movement, he
said, had its center of gravity; it sufficed to control
Figure 6. Gerhard Ulrich Anton Vieth, ‘Ubungen am Pferd,Schlittschuhlaufen’ in: Versuch einer Enzyklopadie der Leibes-
ubungen. Teil 2: System der Leibesubungen (Hartmann, Berlin1795), Table I / III. in: Wolf Kittler, Die Geburt des Partisanenaus dem Geist der Poesie, p. 330. (see note 6).
72 GABRIELE BRANDSTETTERGABRIELE BRANDSTETTER
this point within the interior of the figure; the limbs,
which were nothing but pendula, followed by them-
selves in a mechanical way without any further
assistance’’.34 All of the movements which follow this
principle are graceful, they ‘‘are accomplished with an
ease, lightness and grace that astonish every sensitive
mind’’.35 This ‘‘simple figure’’, which becomes reali-
sable via mastery of gravity and adjustment of the
perpendicular line, follows Blasis’ above-mentioned
principle of mathematical-geometric reflection and its
embodiment by the dancer.
Blasis’ concept -- a mechanics and poetics of the
figure -- is exemplified (and this is the more complex
aesthetic model)36 by two poses: by the ‘‘arabesque’’
and by the ‘‘pirouette’’.
The arabesque is one of Blasis’ preferred poses.
Work on the centre of gravity, the problem of where
to place weight and of harmonious balance are
extremely difficult here: ‘‘Let your body be, in gen-
eral, erect and perpendicular on your legs, except in
certain attitudes, and especially in arabesques, when it
must lean forwards or backwards according to the
position you adopt’’.37 The arabesque is an extremely
unstable pose. From a static point of view the body is
in an unstable balance, which means that the centre of
gravity is located in the highest possible position. This
also means that the body ‘‘carries’’ the greatest pos-
sible energy. If one is deflected from this position --
for example by losing one’s balance, in a pose that
borders on instability -- the kinetic moment occurs
when the body displaces itself far from its location.
This is the moment when weight and weight place-
ment have to move in perfect harmony: ‘‘weight’’,
‘‘centre of gravity’’ and ‘‘counterpoise’’.38
Of the Centre of Gravity in a Dancer: The weight of a manstanding upon one leg is divided in an equal manner on thepoint that sustains the whole, (see fig. 1, plate X) and as he
moves, the central line of gravity passes exactly through themiddle of the leg that rests wholly on the ground.39
Mastering this complicated equilibrium, channelling
the nature of the body into a sovereignty that rules over
the centre of gravity, brings about precisely that plea-
sure in the fragile body sculpture of the arabesque
which defines the moment of grace. Blasis maintains
that hewas the first to discover that the perfect example
of the levitating dance pose of the attitude was the
sculpture ‘‘Mercury’’ by Giovanni da Bologna.40
From an art historical point of view this statue is
considered one of the most important examples of
Mannerism. With it, Giovanni da Bologna is said to
have found one of the most beautiful resolutions
of a figure levitating upwards -- the ‘‘linea serpenti-
nata’’.
The second example of a theory and methodology
of mechanics in dance is the pirouette. According to
Blasis, the pirouette was only really acquired by dance
in the nineteenth century. Earlier, in Noverre’s time,
these wonderful and extraordinarily perfect, quick
turns were unknown. The great contemporary danc-
ers Dauberval, Gardel and Vestris were the true
inventors of the pirouette and therefore also of vir-
tuosity in dance: ‘‘Among our ancient artists those
beautiful tems (sic!) of perpendicularity and equilib-
rium, those elegant attitudes and enchanting arabes-
ques were unknown. That energetic execution, that
multiplicity of steps [. . .] and pirouettes were not then
in practice’’.41 As these figures, these various ways of
turning, are extremely complicated and demand
‘‘steady uprightness and unshaken equilibrium’’,
Blasis gives an extensive treatment of the turn and its
three phases: the preparation, the turn itself and the
various ways of bringing it to an end.42 Here too the
perpendicular line and centre of gravity have to beFigure 7. Carlo Blasis, ‘The Code of Terpsichore’ in: Carlo
Blasis, The Code of Terpsichore, figure 32. (see note 1).
THE CODE OF TERPSICHORETHE CODE OF TERPSICHORE 73
under precise control. There are additional elements,
however, which include the dynamics of the turn and
the regulation of centrifugal force through the arms
and legs -- bordering on eccentricity, almost falling
out of the ‘‘line of gravity’’.
This pirouette has something in it of a magical appearance,for as the body leans so much over, and seems on the pointof falling at each turn of the pirouette, one might think
there was an invisible power that supported the dancer,who counterbalances his eccentricity from the line ofgravity by the positions of his arms and legs, and the greatrapidity of his motions.43
With this extensive discussion of the mechanics of the
turn in the human body, Blasis placed himself at the
intersection of the movement sciences and the tech-
nological concepts of his time. These processes had
long been familiar to both a theoretical and practical
history of mechanics. Only at the end of the eighteenth
century, however, were these mechanical investiga-
tions applied to the movement of human and animal
bodies and to conceptions of their function: at work,
in dance, in the military and during sport, for example.
Around this time the technology of the steam
engine -- with flywheel and centrifugal force regulator
-- also found wider application. The first steam
engines had in fact been built at the end of the eigh-
teenth century already, in the wake of Watt’s
revolutionary discovery.44 But it was only in the 1820s
and 1830s that this engine technology came into its
own. It is also striking that the industrial application
of this technology was accompanied by a discursive
turn: on the one hand in the aestheticisation of engine
technology and on the other in its anthropomorphi-
sation -- it was conceived of and metaphorised as
analogous to the movement of the human body. This
can be seen in nineteenth century concepts of labour,
in questions of self-steering and in the debates on
tiredness that are connected with them.45
A picture by Jean Ignace Grandville from 1834
depicting moving figures is characteristic of the con-
text in which this anthropomorphising application
took place.
Figure 8. Giovanni da Bologna (1528-1608), ‘Mercurio’,Museo Nazionale, Florence, in: Gerhard Zacharias, Ballett --Gestalt und Wesen. Die Symbolsprache im europaischen Schau-
tanz der Neuzeit (DuMont, Cologne 1962), plate 16.
Figure 9. Jean Ignace Grandville, ‘Bewegungsfiguren’ (1834)in: Jan Pieper, ‘Die Maschine im Interieur. Ludwig Persuis’
Dampfmaschinenhaus im Babelsberger Park’, Daidalos 53 (15September 1994), pp. 104--115 (p. 113).
74 GABRIELE BRANDSTETTERGABRIELE BRANDSTETTER
The mechanical theatre opens up a strange, almost
grotesque stage of movement, framed by the obliga-
tory curtain, with seats for spectators and applauding
hands. In the swing of the turn, in the distorting
dynamics of centrifugal force, disparate things and
forms proceed from one other and into one other with
no division: a transformation in a continuous flow of
movement. At the centre, however, the Sylphide bal-
lerina of Romantic ballet whirls around en pointe in a
pirouette. She is the flywheel of this great, general
rotation. To her left, legs in grotesque-arabesque
poses are moving -- having gained their independence
as a particularised bodily series. To her right, the
human body is transformed into a doll and finally
into a spinning top by the speedy mechanics of the
turn. This scenario pushes the theatricity of move-
ment as a figure of virtuoso mechanics, in the sense of
Blasis’ body code, to the extreme -- into the grotesque.
It stages a fascination with a uniform, inexhaustible
and self-regulating mechanics of movement, and
reveals the new world of energy and of nature cheated
by technology on the threshold of the industrial age.46
This is the point at which mechanics and poetry
interface, literally: in the ‘‘turn-moment’’ of the pir-
ouette, in its giddiness, in the giddiness of a new,
hybrid concept of the figure. In Grandville’s picture,
the game of the aesthetic attraction of the nineteenth
century’s newmoving pictures can already be observed
-- as embodied in the dance of a Maria Taglioni, a
Fanny Elssler or Fanny Cerrito: as a transitory scene
of virtuoso body art, fought for in the fleeting balance
act of the arabesque and pirouette en pointe.
The rapidly-turning wheels, the rushing handles and
connecting rods give rise to fleeting rotating figures
where individual forms, the (bodily) elements ob-
servable in a state of calm, can no longer be identified.
Dynamic forms emerge, blurred sculptures that flow
together to form new figures made of electricity and
rays. Here the horizon widens towards modernity’s
aesthetics of perception: the art of the fleeting, as
Baudelaire goes on to describe it shortly afterwards in
Le peintre de la vie moderne. The art of the ‘‘fugitive’’, of
the ‘‘transitory’’,47 where dance takes up a key position
in the fields of movement art and movement sciences.
Finally, I would like to return to Blasis and the
achievements of his Code of Terpsichore, which stands
at the beginningofmodernity’s great project ofmotion.
In this groundbreaking work the mechanics of body
movement and apoetics of bodily representationmeet in
theory and practice. Together, in my opinion, they
form a new theory of the figure. The epitome of this
theory, the figure of the figure as it were -- in keeping
withRomantic reflexivity -- is characterised (how could
it be otherwise) by the arabesque. Inballet ‘‘arabesque’’
delimits a particular group of poses.
‘‘Nothing can be more agreeable to the eye,’’ writes
Blasis, ‘‘than those charming positions which we call
arabesques’’.48 Blasis himself traces the form of the
arabesque back to ‘‘the paintings in fresco at the
Vatican, executed after the beautiful designs of
Raphael’’.49 And he identifies the term ‘‘arabesque’’
as being of Moorish origin.
Arabica ornamenta, as a term in painting, mean thoseornaments, composed of plants, light branches and flowers,with which the artist adorns pictures, compartiments, frises,
panels [. . .] the taste for this sort of ornaments was broughtto us by the Moors and Arabs, from whom they have takentheir name.50
This figure, with its ‘‘aerial lightness, its variety, its
liveliness’’,51 was introduced into dance in various
forms and groupings, as a ‘‘sculptural figure’’. Blasis
was the first to define the term for dance. And he
Figure 10. ‘Fanny Cerrito’ (Turin 1835). Lithograph by Ajelloand Doyen from a drawing by Battaglia. Raccolta di Stampa,Castello Sforzesco, Milan, in: Ivor Guest, Fanny Cerrito. The
Life of a Romantic Ballerina, 2nd revised edition (DanceBooks, London 1974), figure Ib.
THE CODE OF TERPSICHORETHE CODE OF TERPSICHORE 75
reconfigured, to a certain extent, those arabesque
ornaments that were still surface and line figures and
floor patterns in the Baroque and inMannerism, into a
spatial figure. As only Heinrich von Kleist with his
Marionettentheater did otherwise, Blasis’ theory trans-
formed the mechanics of bodily movement and bodily
representation into a figure of grace: the arabesque.
And he did so in a new configuration of painting,
sculpture and mechanics. A model of representation of
the body emerges from this meeting between science
and the arts, a model that reflects the conditions of its
constitution. The ‘‘Code of Terpsichore’’ is therefore a
language of movement as well as a configuration of the
‘‘muse of dance’’: mechanics as the matrix of grace.
Whereas Kleist, with his Marionettentheater, pro-
poses a figure of thought of grace of a second order,
somewhere between animal and doll, Blasis brings to-
gether the movement science of mechanics and the
descriptive theory of grace (as mimesis) into a poetics
of the arabesque; the arabesque as a figure of that
aesthetic of the fleeting, of elevation and evanescence,
which we see when we conjure up pictures of nine-
teenth century Romantic ballet.Figure 11. ‘Ten; Maria Taglioni als Schatten, Antonio Guerra
als Loredan’. Lithograph after Joseph Bouvier (London 1804)in: Carl Dahlhaus und das Forschungsinstitut fur Musikthe-ater der Universiat Bayreuth (eds.), unter Leitung von Sieghart
Dohring, Pipers Enzyklopadie des Musiktheaters. Oper --Operette -- Musical -- Ballett, in 6 volumes and with an index(Piper, Munich 1997), Volume 6 (Spontini to Zumsteeg), p.233.
Figure 12. Paul Renouard, ‘Exercises de danse a l’opera’ in:Oscar Bie, Der Tanz. Mit Buchschmuck von Karl Walser und
hundert Kunstbeilagen (Bard, Marquardt & Co., Berlin 1906),illustration between p. 308 and 309.
Figure 13. ‘Eva Evdokimova’ in: Max Niehaus, Ballett Faszi-nation. Vom Studio zur Buhne (Nymphenburger, Munich1972), illustration 28.
76 GABRIELE BRANDSTETTERGABRIELE BRANDSTETTER
The arabesque in ballet also represents a figure of
femininity, just as Kleist’s figure of grace represents
the figure of the male hero, but that is another issue
altogether.
Notes
* Translated from the German by Chantal Wright.1 Cited throughout this paper in the 1830 edition, see Blasis
1830.2 Cf. Souritz 1990.3 Blasis 1968 includes a biographical sketch and foreword by
Mary Stewart Evans. See the introduction on p.VIII. The factthat, even today, ballet teachers study the fundamentals ofanatomy as part of their training can also be traced back toBlasis.4 Bie 1906, p. 301.5 Cf. Blasis 1830, p. 95, see note 1.6 Kleist’s puppet, as a ‘‘machinist’’, similarly embodies both
the mechanist and the inspiration behind the finding/discoveryof movement (as one who imagines himself into the figure). Cf.on the ‘question of movement’ and the subject of grace: Kittler
1987; Kleiner 1994 ; Knab 1996. In contrast, Christian PaulBerger’s study of Kleist Bewegungsbilder. Kleists Marionetten-theater zwischen Poesie und Physik, (Berger 2000), does not,even though the title would suggest otherwise, investigate the
aesthetics and mechanics of movement, but rather gives a(philosophical--anthropological) interpretation of integral‘‘moving pictures’’ in Kleist -- an approach which in my
opinion is too holistic for a theory and description ofmovement and which does not differentiate between thecomplex tangle of discourses which developed in the eighteenth
century prior to Kleist and Blasis.7 Blasis never tires of promoting study of the fine arts as asource of influence on a dancer’s powers of imagination:
‘‘While upon the stage, the dancer should never cease to be apotential model to a painter or sculptor’’; and he thereforeadvises the student ‘‘to study both drawing and music, as thesewill be of the greatest value to them in their art.’’ (Blasis 1968,
p. 8 and p. 10, see note 3).8 On Noverre’s foundation of this as an independent dramaticart form, cf. Noverre 1930.9 Noverre 1930, Letter 4, p. 29. Also cf. Brandstetter 1990.10 The first version of his ‘‘treatise’’ was published in Milanin 1820. Blasis published a study in Paris that makes
reference to the ‘‘querelle des anciennes et des modernes’’,from the perspective of an aesthetics oriented aroundmovement, the body and dance: De l’Origine et des Progresde la Danse Ancienne et Moderne. Following his main work
The Code of Terpsichore, which was revised many times andtranslated into many European languages, Blasis wrote a lateanthropological tract: L’uomo fisico, intellettuale e morale,
Blasis 1857.11 Cf. Blasis 1830, Part 2: Theory of Theatrical Dancing, p.93ff.12 Ibid., p. 97f.
13 Ibid., p. 96.14 Ibid.15 Ibid., p. 97.16 Ibid.17 Ibid., p. 96f.18 The relationship between the concept of the body described
here and a history of perception, of perspective, of the‘‘showroom’’ of the body (as theatricity) requires moreextensive research. Cf. on the horizons of a cultural-historicaltheory of perception, Crary 1990 and Crary 1999.19 Julius Bernhard von Rohr, as cited in Fruhsorge 1990, p. 48.20 Locke ([1705]1968).21 Ibid., p. 310.22 Ibid.23 Ibid.24 The treatise Essai sur la Beaute by Antoine de Marcenay de
Ghuy takes up an interesting position in the matter ofrepresentation of the body and the concepts of beauty and ofgrace, because he situates his concept of (movement and)
beauty between sculpture, mechanics and physiology: ‘‘c’estque la grace est independante des belles proportions; [. . .] cerapport exact entre la pensee & les signes representatifs qu’ilauroit du caracteriser, a neglige maladroitement la partie la
plus essentielle de son art’’ (de Marcenay de Ghuy [1770]1972, p. 30f).25 In German, this is signalled by a change in expression from
Grazie [grace] to Anmut [charm, loveliness, elegance]; cf. Knab,1996 and Kleiner 1994.26 See Brandstetter 1990.27 As cited in Kittler 1987, p. 343.28 Cf. ibid., p. 333.29 The aim here is that ‘‘every step [of this human machine]
occurs in the only possible correct order, each one preparesand facilitates all future ones, and the health and beauty of thebody are not only not endangered but strengthened’’, as citedin Kittler 1987, p. 33.30 The complexity of bodily discipline and its discourses ran ontwo different levels in the nineteenth century. On the one hand itran in the direction of a gymnastics (and later exercise)
movement, which also fulfilled a labour-market function andwas promoted as a fitness programme for the military. On theother hand it operated on an aesthetically coded level: in dance
(stage dance as well as social dance), a direction it tookseemingly independently of the gymnastics movement’s advo-cacy of bodily fitness, but which turned up numerous linksbetween body culture and ‘‘free dance’’ around 1900, as part of
a wide-reaching reform movement which extended to the‘‘social body’’ as well as the artistic body of the dancer. It isstill striking that discursive-analytic research into nineteenth
century concepts of the body does not take up this proximityand the specific difference between economic/hygienic discourseof the body and an aesthetic discourse of the body (which is
nonetheless arranged around the knowledge dispositives of theage). Cf., for example, Sarasin 2001.31 Kittler 1987, p. 330.32 Blasis 1830, Part 2: Theory of Theatrical Dancing, p. 93ff.33 Ibid., p. 72.
THE CODE OF TERPSICHORETHE CODE OF TERPSICHORE 77
34 von Kleist 1990, p. 415.35 Ibid., p. 417.36 If one wanted to make a further link to Kleist’s Marion-
ettentheater, then one could analyse the figure of the ellipse(with an eye to the figure of the arabesque, see the conclusionof this paper), with respect to both its mathematical and its
tropical ‘‘incarnation’’. Cf., on the ellipse as trope, de Man1984, p. 286.37 Blasis 1830, Part 2: Theory of Theatrical Dancing, p. 65.38 It should at least be noted here that one of Blasis’ many
important innovations in dance technique was the discovery of‘‘counterpoise’’ for a theory and practice of movement.39 Blasis 1830, p. 73.40 Ibid., p. 74. ‘‘It is, in my opinion, a kind of imitation of theattitude so much admired in the Mercury of J. Bologne.’’41 Ibid., p. 82.42 Blasis clearly describes the physical conditions necessaryfor a stable starting point for a pirouette (feet, toes, contactwith the floor): ‘‘Let your body be steadily fixed on your legs
before you begin to do your pirouettes, and place your armsin such a position as to give additional force to the impulsethat sends you round, as also to act as a balance tocounterpoise every part of your body as it revolves on your
toes’’ (Blasis, 1830, p. 85).43 Ibid., p. 86.44 On the relationship between the body-machine and the
steam engine in the context of nineteenth century physiology,cf. Osietzki 1998.45 On the relationship between mechanics and tiredness, cf.,
for example, Koschorke 2000, as well as Rabinbach 1998. Onthe history and anthropology of the machine, see alsoBurckhardt 1999.46 Cf. Feldman 2000, pp. 224-260.47 Cf. Brandstetter 1995.48 Blasis 1830, p. 74.49 Ibid.; on the arabesque cf. the seminal studies of Oesterle
(2000a), as well as Oesterle (2000b).50 Blasis 1830, p. 74.51 Ibid., p. 75.
References
Berger, C. P.: 2000, Bewegungsbilder. Kleists Marionettenthe-ater zwischen Poesie und Physik, Paderborn, Munchen,
Wien, Zurich: Schoningh.Bie, O.: 1906, Der Tanz. Mit Buchschmuck von Karl Walser
und hundert Kunstbeilagen, Berlin: Bard, Marquardt & Co.Blasis, C.: 1830, The Code of Terpsichore. The Art of Dancing:
Comprising its Theory and Practice, and A History of itsRise and Progress from the Earliest Times, London: Bull.
Blasis, C.: 1857, L’uomo fisico, intellettuale e morale, Milan:
Tipografa Gugliemini.Blasis, C.: 1968, An Elementary Treatise upon the Theory and
Practice of the Art of Dancing, translated and with a bio-
graphical sketch and foreword by Mary Stewart Evans,New York: Dover Publ.
Brandstetter, G.: 1990, ‘Die Bilderschrift der Empfindungen’,Jean Georges Noverre’s ‘Lettres sur la Danse, et sur lesBallets’ and Friedrich Schiller’s treatise ‘Uber Anmut und
Wurde’, in A. Aurnhammer, K. Manger, F. Strack (eds.),Schiller und die hofische Welt, pp. 77--93, Tubingen: Nie-meyer.
Brandstetter, G.: 1995, Tanz-Lekturen. Korperbilder derAvantgarde, Frankfurt a.M: Fischer-Taschenbuch.
Burckhardt, M.: 1999, Vom Geist der Maschine. Eine Ges-chichte kultureller Umbruche, Frankfurt a.M./New York
Campus.Crary, J.: 1990, Techniques of the Observer, Camb., Mass: MIT
Press.
Crary, J.: 1999, Suspensions of perception: Attention, Spectacle,and Modern Culture, Camb., Mass./London: MIT Press.
Feldman, A.: 2000, ‘Der menschliche Touch. Zu einer histor-
ischen Anthropologie und Traumanalyse von selbsttatigenInstrumenten’, in G. Brandstetter and H. Volckers (eds.),ReMembering the Body, pp. 224--260, Ostfildern-Ruit:Hatje Cantz.
Fruhsorge, G.: 1990, (ed.), Einleitung zur Ceremoniel-Wis-senschaft der Privatpersonen [Berlin 1728], Edition Leipzig:Leipzig: VHC, Acta humaniora.
Kittler, W.: 1987, Die Geburt des Partisanen aus dem Geist derPoesie. Heinrich von Kleist und die Strategie der Be-freiungskriege, Freiburg i.Br.: Rombach.
Kleiner, G.: 1994, Die verschwundene Anmut, Frankfurt a.M.:Lang.
von Kleist, H.: 1990, tr. Roman Paska, ‘On the Marionette
Theater’, in M. Feher (ed.), Fragments for a Historyof the Human Body, Part I, pp. 415--421, New York:Urzone.
Knab, J.: 1996, Asthetik der Anmut. Studien zur ‘‘Schonheit der
Bewegung’’ im 18. Jahrhundert, Frankfurt a.M.: Lang.Koschorke, A.: 2000, ‘Selbststeuerung. David Hartleys Assoz-
iationstheorie, Adam Smiths Sympathielehre und die
Dampfmaschine von JamesWatt’, in I. Baxmann,M. Franz,W. Schaffner (eds.), Das Laokoon-Paradigma. Zeichenre-gime im 20. Jahrhundert, pp. 179--190, Berlin: Akademie.
Locke, J.: [1705] ‘Some Thoughts Concerning Education’, in J.L. Axtell (ed.), The Educational Writings of John Locke,Cambridge: CUP.
de Man, P.: 1984, ‘Aesthetic Formalization: Kleist’s Uber das
Marionettentheater’, in Paul de Man, The Rhetoric ofRomanticism, pp. 263--290. New York: Columbia Univer-sity Press.
deMarcenay de Ghuy, A.: 1972, [1770], Essai sur la Beaute suivide Idee de la Gravure (Paris 1770), reprint, Geneva: Minkoff.
Noverre, J. G.: 1930, Letters on dancing and ballets, translated
by Cyril W. Beaumont, London: Beaumont.Oesterle, G.: 2000a, ‘Asthetische Figurationen im Klassizismus
und in der Romantik. Der ‘‘fruchtbare Augenblick’’ und die
Arabeske’ in P. Wiesinger (ed.), Akten des X. Internation-alen Germanistenkongresses Wien 2000. ‘‘Zeitenwende’’ --Die Germanistik auf dem Weg vom 20. ins 21. Jahrhundert,vol. 6, pp. 73--78. Bern, Berlin, Brussels, Frankfurt a.M.,
New York, Oxford, Vienna: Lang.
78 GABRIELE BRANDSTETTERGABRIELE BRANDSTETTER
Oesterle, G.: 2000b, ‘Arabeske’, in K. Barck et al. (eds.), As-thetische Grundbegriffe. Historisches Worterbuch in siebenBanden, vol. 1, pp. 27--286. Frankfurt a.M.: Metzler.
Osietzki, M.: 1998, ‘Korpermaschinen und Dampfmaschinen.Vom Wandel der Physiologie und des Korpers unter demEinfluß von Industrialisierung und Thermodynamik’ in P.
Sarasin and J. Tanner (eds.), Physiologie und industrielleGesellschaft. Studien zur Verwissenschaftlichung des Korpersim 19. und 20. Jahrhundert, pp. 313--346. Frankfurt a.M.:Suhrkamp.
Rabinbach, A.: 1998, ‘Ermudung, Energie und der menschli-che Motor’ in P. Sarasin and J. Tanner (eds.), Physiologieund industrielle Gesellschaft. Studien zur Verwissenschaftli-
chung des Korpers im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert, pp. 286--312.Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
Sarasin, P.: 2001, Reizbare Maschinen. Eine Geschichte des
Korpers 1765--1914, Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.Souritz, E.: 1990, ‘Carlo Blasis a Mosca,’ in J. Sasportes (ed.),
Il ballo romantico in Italia, pp. 137--156 (La Danza Italiana,nos. 8--9), Rome: Edizioni del Centro documentazione
danza.
Institut fur Theaterwissenschaft
Freie Universitat Berlin
Grunewaldstrasse 35
12165 Berlin
Germany
E-mail: [email protected]
Gabriele Brandstetter (1997--2003), Professor of ModernGerman Literature Studies at the University of Basel, since2003 Professor of Theater Studies at the Free University of
Berlin. Her research focus is on: performance theories; con-cepts of body and movement in notation, image and perfor-mance; dance, theatricality and gender differences. Selected
publications: Loie Fuller. Tanz - Licht-Spiel - Art Nouveau1989, (with co-Author B. Ochaim); Tanz-Lekturen. Korper-bilder und Raumfiguren der Avantgarde (1995); ReMemberingthe Body. Korperbilder in Bewegung (2000, with co-editor
Sibylle Peters); Erzahlen und Wissen. Paradigmen und Aporienihrer Inszenierungen in Goethes ’Wahlverwandschaften’ (Ed.,2003).
THE CODE OF TERPSICHORETHE CODE OF TERPSICHORE 79