the carl gustthe carl gustav m/45av m/45 - dillon · pdf filecontrol airplanes in mike...

1
d e housing removed. It worked just as well as when it had the housing installed. The removable magazine housing let Bob fit a Suomi drum magazine to the m/45. He said it took about an hour of judicious grinding and filing on the magazine. I found that adding the 71-round drum magazine changed the m/45’s balance and made the gun muzzle heavy. Shooting drums of 9mms was fun, but I preferred the feel of the m/45 with stick mags. (It just occurred to me that a drum mag would be the thing for shooting at the remote control airplanes in Mike Dillon’s “Machine Gun Magic” video, however.) Bob told me the Carl Gustav had “a good trigger. It’s easy to shoot singles with it.” I’ve known well- practiced people who could shoot singles with full- auto-only subguns. But, I figured I was doing well to shoot doubles, or triples. Shooting the m/45, I found Bob was right. The trigger was lighter and cleaner than those on other subguns I’ve shot. Some of those triggers were awful, some barely acceptable, and some reason- ably good. The m/45’s trigger was good, verging on great. I was able to shoot singles, on demand, for the first hour and a half. After that I got tired, lost my edge and reverted to shooting doubles and triples. Bob and Ethan had no such difficulty. While a straight blowback firearm, the Carl Gus- tav has cyclic rate of around 600 rpm. This is slow enough that the gun is also controllable in burst fire. All of us were able to keep three- and four- round bursts of 9mm hardball on small areas of cardboard silhouette targets at 15 yards. Leaning into the gun helped, but wasn’t as essential as with subguns in larger calibers. Moving between silhouette targets wasn’t diffi- cult either. The m/45 swung easily between two set six feet apart. I’ve shot subgun matches with a Madsen M50. After an hour of shooting the m/45, I was convinced it would be a better competition gun than the Danish Madsen. A U.S. M3 might beat the Swede in matches with heavy, hard-set, steel targets. In my opinion it wouldn’t beat the m/45 by much. Checking the BATFE website, I discovered that the original m/45 is on the Curio & Relics list. That’s interesting, but I’ve rarely seen an original m/45 for sale. For those who are lucky enough to have a Carl Gustav, some parts kits are available now. Fifty round Suomi magazines can also be found. Thinking back, I found two subguns that approached the Carl Gustav’s handling qualities. One was the Beretta M38/42 and the other was the UD M42. Both are also World War II-era 9mm guns. I’ve also fired a Smith & Wesson M76, but didn’t find the one I shot to have the same feel as its Swedish ancestor. The folding stock on the M76 seemed much less substantial, for one thing. It would be interesting to shoot the two guns side by side. The m/45 had to compete with many World War II-era subguns available on the surplus market when developed. If the Swede had been designed and produced a few years earlier, I think it might have replaced some of those other subguns. I’m glad I had the chance to shoot one. D P THE CARL GUSTAV M/45 THE CARL GUSTAV M/45 Sep 07 Blue Press 20-37 7/14/07 9:39 AM Page 37

Upload: truongnhu

Post on 22-Mar-2018

221 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: THE CARL GUSTTHE CARL GUSTAV M/45AV M/45 - Dillon · PDF filecontrol airplanes in Mike Dillon’s “Machine Gun Magic” video, ... Madsen M50. After an hour of ... THE CARL GUSTTHE

d

e

housing removed. It worked just as well as whenit had the housing installed.

The removable magazine housing let Bob fit aSuomi drum magazine to the m/45. He said it tookabout an hour of judicious grinding and filing onthe magazine. I found that adding the 71-rounddrum magazine changed the m/45’s balance andmade the gun muzzle heavy. Shooting drums of9mms was fun, but I preferred the feel of the m/45with stick mags. (It just occurred to me that a drummag would be the thing for shooting at the remotecontrol airplanes in Mike Dillon’s “Machine GunMagic” video, however.)

Bob told me the Carl Gustav had “a good trigger.It’s easy to shoot singles with it.” I’ve known well-practiced people who could shoot singles with full-auto-only subguns. But, I figured I was doing wellto shoot doubles, or triples.

Shooting the m/45, I found Bob was right. Thetrigger was lighter and cleaner than those on othersubguns I’ve shot. Some of those triggers wereawful, some barely acceptable, and some reason-ably good. The m/45’s trigger was good, verging ongreat. I was able to shoot singles, on demand, forthe first hour and a half. After that I got tired, lostmy edge and reverted to shooting doubles andtriples. Bob and Ethan had no such difficulty.

While a straight blowback firearm, the Carl Gus-tav has cyclic rate of around 600 rpm. This is slowenough that the gun is also controllable in burstfire. All of us were able to keep three- and four-round bursts of 9mm hardball on small areas ofcardboard silhouette targets at 15 yards. Leaning

into the gun helped, but wasn’t as essential as withsubguns in larger calibers.

Moving between silhouette targets wasn’t diffi-cult either. The m/45 swung easily between twoset six feet apart. I’ve shot subgun matches with aMadsen M50. After an hour of shooting the m/45,I was convinced it would be a better competitiongun than the Danish Madsen. A U.S. M3 mightbeat the Swede in matches with heavy, hard-set,steel targets. In my opinion it wouldn’t beat them/45 by much.

Checking the BATFE website, I discovered thatthe original m/45 is on the Curio & Relics list. That’sinteresting, but I’ve rarely seen an original m/45 forsale. For those who are lucky enough to have a CarlGustav, some parts kits are available now. Fiftyround Suomi magazines can also be found.

Thinking back, I found two subguns thatapproached the Carl Gustav’s handling qualities.One was the Beretta M38/42 and the other wasthe UD M42. Both are also World War II-era9mm guns. I’ve also fired a Smith & WessonM76, but didn’t find the one I shot to have thesame feel as its Swedish ancestor. The foldingstock on the M76 seemed much less substantial,for one thing. It would be interesting to shoot thetwo guns side by side.

The m/45 had to compete with many World WarII-era subguns available on the surplus market whendeveloped. If the Swede had been designed andproduced a few years earlier, I think it might havereplaced some of those other subguns. I’m glad Ihad the chance to shoot one. DP

THE CARL GUSTAV M/45THE CARL GUSTAV M/45

Sep 07 Blue Press 20-37 7/14/07 9:39 AM Page 37