the c8 meeting: a conversation about clean coal, climate change, carbon capture, and china ccs...

18
The C8 Meeting: A Conversation about Clean Coal, Climate Change, Carbon Capture, and China CCS Deployment and Status Update: the U.S. and Globally Michael E. Moore Vice President External Affairs and Business Development Blue Source LLC Executive Director – NACCSA Washington, DC February 13 th , 2011

Upload: isabella-horton

Post on 25-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

The C8 Meeting: A Conversation about Clean Coal, Climate Change, Carbon Capture, and China

CCS Deployment and Status Update: the U.S. and Globally

Michael E. MooreVice President External Affairs and Business Development

Blue Source LLCExecutive Director – NACCSA

Washington, DC February 13th, 2011

Global CCS Projects

European CCS Projects

North America CCS Projects

480,000 Miles of Natural Gas and HL Pipelines

7

~400 Lower 48 Gas Storage Facilities

8

Current CO2 Pipeline Network

9

INGAA High EOR CO2 PipelinesCARBON SEQUESTRATION & STORAGE: DEVELOPING A TRANSPORTATIONINFRASTRUCTURE

Prepared for The INGAA Foundation, Inc. by:ICF International Feb 2009

10

11

Integrating CO2 Capture and Storage Using CO2-EOR

The 27 states with light shading offer CO2 storage capacity with EOR. The states with the dark purple outline are within the Ohio River Valley (ECAR) region.

Total and captured CO2 emissions* from coal-fired power plants in 30 years (Gt).

CO2 storage capacity provided by “traditional” CO2-EOR (Gt) in each market region.

CO2 storage capacity (Gt) provided by EOR in the Residual Oil Zone in the Permian Basin.

6.4

With three long distance (800 mile), large capacity (5 Bcfd) pipelines, plus shorter distance CO2 distribution lines, CO2-EOR could store all of the CO2 captured in 30 years from Ohio River Valley (ECAR) coal-fired power plants.

5.5 2.7

*Captured CO2 assumes retirement of inefficient coal-fired capacity equal to 1/3 of today’s CO2 emissions and 90% CO2 capture from the remaining coal-fired plants.

159

1.7

3.7

159

+12 to 18

6.4

+12 to 18

Source: Advanced Resources Int’l (2010).

Texas Offshore Repositoryhttp://www.aapg.org/explorer/2010/09sep/co2storage0910.cfm

• The three-year project $6 million in grants National Energy Technology Laboratory and the Texas General Land Office.

• To identify state-owned areas underlying the Gulf where CO2 can be stored safely and economically.

• Gulf of Mexico Miocene CO2 Site Characterization Mega Transect, the effort is focused specifically on the geologic potential of Miocene age rocks of Texas State Submerged Lands to store CO2 for geologically significant periods of time.

States with CCS & GS Actions Current or Pending

• Texas • Wyoming• Kansas • New Mexico• Oklahoma• Montana• Pennsylvania• Indiana• Kentucky• New York

• Washington• Louisiana• Michigan• Mississippi• North Dakota• West Virginia• Illinois• Ohio• Alabama• South Carolina

Market Mechanisms

• California under AB 32 Cap and Trade Program• Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative• State RPS programs• Federal CES?• Voluntary reductions/Offsets • Commodity value of CO2 from EOR and

beneficial uses• Tax credits, grants and loan guarantees

US CCS Deployment Overview• US-ten large scale CCS/ICCS projects in various stages of deployment, supportive

funding in place• Extensive research coming in on geologic storage and capacity• Extensive Federal regulatory work per GHG’s and storage set• Extensive policy work has taken place per GHG’s—depends on political will to

advance• Pipeline and compression infrastructure well understood – research on improved

technology and compression efficiency underway• Extensive research work coming in on capture technologies--Base technologies well

understood—work on developing energy efficient and cost effective processes underway

• Siting, permitting and construction well understood• CCS protocols and methodology for accounting and sequestration under

development – to be released 2nd qtr 2011• Policy work on storage stewardship and liability-Federal and State at various stages—

show stopper if not developed• Land use, ownership and mineral rights well understood, pore space use and

ownership getting better definition state by state• US CCS deployment ultimately depends on public acceptance, political will and the

public’s willingness to absorb the costs

Questions & Thank You!Michael E. Moore

• VP External Affairs and Business Development CCS • Blue Source LLC• WWW.BLUESOURCE.COM

• Executive Director and Founding Board of Directors Member• North American Carbon Capture Storage Association• WWW.NACCSA.Org

• VP and Founding Board of Directors Member• Texas Carbon Capture Storage Association• WWW.TXCCSA.Org

[email protected]

• Tel: 281-668-8475

Resources

• IOGCC CO2 Pipeline Study: http://www.iogcc.state.ok.us/Websites/iogcc/Images/PTTF%20Final%20Report%202011.pdf

• DOE/NETL 2010 Carbon Sequestration Atlas of the United States and Canada – Third Edition (Atlas III) : http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/carbon_seq/refshelf/atlasIII/index.html

• CCS REG: http://www.ccsreg.org/; http://www.ccsreg.org/pdf/workshop/Workshop_Summary_R1.pdf

• Sources and Sinks location: http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/carbon_seq/refshelf/atlasIII/2010AtlasIII_Intro-National.pdf