the benefits of national accreditation steve arms the nelac institute tni
TRANSCRIPT
The Benefits of National Accreditation
Steve ArmsThe NELAC Institute
TNI
The NELAC Institute’s Mission
To foster the generation of environmental data of known and documented quality through an open, inclusive, and transparent process that is responsive to the needs of the community
The NELAC Institute’sVision for the FutureA true national accreditation program, whereby all entities involved in the generation of environmental measurement data within the United States are accredited to one uniform, rigorous, and robust program that has been implemented consistently nationwide and focuses on the technical competence of the entity pursuing accreditation
TNI’s Accreditation Programs
Designed to ensured competency Intended to ensure environmental data
of known and documented quality
An objective way of showing An objective way of showing clients, the community and clients, the community and
the government that an the government that an organization has the organization has the
demonstrated capability to demonstrated capability to conduct the services they conduct the services they
provide.provide.
National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation
Program (NELAP)
Program components: The recognition of accreditation bodies The adoption of acceptance limits for
proficiency testing The adoption of consensus standards for
use in the program The adoption of the laboratory
accreditation system
To establish and implement a program for the accreditation of environmental laboratories
National Environmental Field Accreditation Program (NEFAP)
To establish and implement a program for the accreditation of field sampling and measurement
organizations (FSMOs)Program components: The recognition of accreditation bodies The development and adoption of the
accreditation system
TNI is also pursuing the development of standards for assuring the competency of
organizations involved in stationary source air emissions
testing.
NELAP AccreditationUnique
Based on an internationally recognized standard expanded to focus on unique aspects of environmental testing
Performed with respect to a specific scope of accreditation conducted by qualified assessors
Involves review of results of periodic proficiency testing performed by the laboratory
NELAP AccreditationExtensive
Over 1500 accredited laboratories Over 2000 accreditations 48 states and 1 territory 8 foreign countries
Laboratory Accreditation System Program
Develops a system for the accreditation of environmental laboratories:
Policies and procedures, interpretations, guidance documents, and related tools for use by Accreditation Bodies to implement a national environmental laboratory accreditation program.
Reviews standards for suitability Subcommittee:
National Database Committee
Our Heritage . . .SDWA
Certification Program
1978
State Programs expand
into other media
CLP De-facto National Program
19951999
2002
2004
2003
2001
2006
NELAC Restructur
e
Explore Self
Sufficiency
Explore Self
Sufficiency
2003 NELAC
Standard
November 6, 2006
1980’s
The 2003 NELAC StandardStrengths
Uses ISO 17025 quality system approach Adds specificity to improve clarity and help
with consistency for environmental testing Allows flexibility in meeting requirements Represents best professional practice Allows for multiple Accreditation Bodies to
implement consistently
The 2003 NELAC StandardWeaknesses
Refers to an organization that no longer exists
Hard to find all the laboratory requirements Written by chemists for chemists Some language could be improved Not a true consensus standard Does not incorporate ISO 17011 for
Accreditation Bodies Muddled and outdated version of ISO 17025
A New Approach Start with the purpose of an
accreditation program Ensure key elements are retained Consider the following goals:
Easy to use and understand Easy to grow and expand Easy to revise and implement Applicable to all laboratories
Basis of the New Standard
International Standards ISO 17025 ISO 17011 ISO Guide 43
Work of NELAC from 1994 - 2003 Significant input from TNI
membership during consensus voting process
Benefits of New Laboratory Standards
Removal of outdated NELAC language Incorporation of ISO 17011 Incorporation of current version of ISO
17025 Volume/Modular approach simplifies
understanding Improved clarity of Technical Requirements Increased flexibility Very few new requirements True consensus standard!!!
Format of the New Standard
Sector Identifiable accreditation program with
unique requirements, e.g., NELAP Volume
Key elements of an accreditation program for a particular sector
Module Specific requirements combined with
other modules to create a volume
2008 TNI Standards Volume 1 Laboratory
Requirements Module 1: Proficiency
Testing Module 2: Quality Systems
General Requirements Module 3: Asbestos Testing Module 4: Chemical Testing Module 5: Microbiological
Testing Module 6: Radiochemical
Testing Module 7: Toxicity Testing
Volume 2 Accreditation Body Requirements
Module 1 – General Requirements
Module 3 – On-Site Assessment
Module 2: Proficiency Testing
Volume 3 Proficiency Test Provider Requirements
Volume 4 Proficiency Testing Oversight
Benefits for the PublicConfidence
Health and environment are being protected using reliable, authentic data
A recognized concept Hospitals Universities Forensic laboratories
Benefits for Data Users
Consumer Protection Assurance that the laboratory has
been evaluated and has met established standards
Reduces risks associated with unreliable data Expensive re-testing Legal or financial liability
Regulatory acceptance of data
Benefits for the Profession
Advances the Field Uniform standards of practice A venue to share knowledge
Professional interaction in consensus Forum for improvement
Benefits for AgenciesAssurance that data is adequate
for use Dependable environmental decisions
based on data that is: Accurate Traceable Reproducible
Reduced uncertainty Increased public confidence in
governmental management of the environment
Benefits for AgenciesEfficient allocation of
resources A single set of standards to manage Cost effective
Data can be used by multiple stakeholders
Redundant assessments by QA oversight bodies can be reduced
Benefits for AgenciesEfficient allocation of
resources Reduced direct costs due to “problems”
Less re-testing Less re-sampling Less lost time Fewer false positives and negatives
Reduced effort needed to define project expectations and requirements More constant baseline expectations for
environmental projects More efficient communications regarding Data
Quality Objectives and project deliverables
Benefits for the OrganizationSelf-evaluation
Improved training program and communication
Improved processes and procedures Improved internal consistency Reduction in QC incidents, rejections
and complaints
Benefits for the OrganizationSelf-evaluation
Promotes continuous improvement attitude Effective system for accountability Reputation benchmark for maintaining
competence Improved employee quality awareness
A Better Quality System!
Benefits for the Organization and for Accreditation BodiesA Nationally Consistent
Standard An industry hindered by political boundaries
Opportunities for reciprocity and recognition
Removal of barriers Reduced time and expense caused
by redundancy
The Florida Experience
All environmental testing laboratories are held to the same standard
Assessment consistency has improved Marginal labs have become acceptable Environmental decisions are now clearly
traceable to documented data Benefits of mutual recognition realized
A Self-Nourishing Concept
Opportunities for Quality Improvements The TNI standards development process
encourages pooling of expertise from multiple governmental agencies and private sector groups.
A larger scope of expertise strengthens the quality concepts and practices upon which the standards are based.
Having additional requirements for laboratory assessments facilitates the expansion of the scope of accreditation programs and improves the abilities of the assessors.
Result: better assessments and ultimately better laboratories and data!
Thank You!