the 2018 elections...• all 435 u.s. house seats were up • 35 of 100 u.s. senate seats were up...

47
The 2018 Elections Kathryn Pearson Associate Professor of Political Science University of Minnesota

Upload: others

Post on 02-Oct-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

The 2018 Elections

Kathryn PearsonAssociate Professor of Political Science

University of Minnesota

Page 2: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

• All 435 U.S. House seats were up

• 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up

• Midterm Election Effects:– President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential approval and the economy

matter– Lower turnout than in presidential elections

2018 Midterm Elections

Page 3: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential
Page 4: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential
Page 5: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

23 GOP Districts Voted for Clinton

Page 6: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

12 Democratic Districts Voted for Trump

Page 7: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

Midterm elections are nationalized and a referendum on the President

Page 8: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential
Page 9: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential
Page 10: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential
Page 11: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

Red Shift from 2012 to 2016

Page 12: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

Democrats Gained Seats in the Suburbs

Source: New York Times

Page 13: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

Democrats Gained Seats in Wealthier Districts

Page 14: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

Minnesota House Races: Half of delegation switches parties

• 1st District Flips – Jim Hagedorn (R) + 0.4

• 2nd District Flips – Angie Craig (D) + 5.6

• 3rd District Flips – Dean Phillips (D) + 11.4

• 8th District Flips– Pete Stauber (R) + 5.5

Page 15: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

Minnesota Independent Expenditures(with one week to go)

Page 16: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential
Page 17: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

Turnout

Page 18: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential
Page 19: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

Vote Choice - Gender

Page 20: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

Gender Divide – 1982 to 2018

Page 21: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

Gender Gap: Men Have Left the Democratic Party

Page 22: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

Women are not a monolithic group

Page 23: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

Age

Page 24: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential
Page 25: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

18-29 and 60 plus, 1982 to 2018

Page 26: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

Race

Page 27: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential
Page 28: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

Race, 1982-2018

Page 29: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

Education

Page 30: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential
Page 31: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential
Page 32: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential
Page 33: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

Midterm Voters Vote Their Party

Page 34: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential
Page 35: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential
Page 36: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

Immigration and Vote Choice, 2018

Page 37: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

Scholarly research shows that when women run for Congress and the state legislature, women win at the same rate as men.

Why So Few Women in Congress?

Page 38: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

Women set records in 2018• 476 U.S. House primary candidates

• 53 U.S. Senate primary candidates

• Won primaries at higher rates than men

• Partisan gap – Women were 43% of Democrats’ nominees

for U.S. House and Senate– Women were 22% of Republicans’ nominees

for the U.S. Senate and 13% for the House

Page 39: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

Record number of women were on the ballot in 2018

Source: The New York Times

Page 40: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential
Page 41: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

Non-incumbent Dem. women won at a higher rate than men

Page 42: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential
Page 43: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

First Term Democrats First Term Republicans

Page 44: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

Minnesota

• Senator Amy Klobuchar won with 60%• Senator Tina Smith won with 53%• Governor-elect Tim Walz won with 54%• AG-elect Keith Ellison won with 49%

• 18 statehouse seats flipped for DFL control of the Minnesota House– Minnesota suburbs are key

Page 45: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential
Page 46: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

Source: Pew Research Center 2018

Page 47: The 2018 Elections...• All 435 U.S. House seats were up • 35 of 100 U.S. Senate seats were up • Midterm Election Effects: – President’s party is disadvantaged – Presidential

Implications for Governing• Divided Government in Washington

– Competing policy and political agendas• Gridlock • Minimal bipartisan cooperation

– Oversight and investigation of the Executive Branch

• Narrowly Divided Government in Minnesota– Incentives for cooperation and conflict

• Both parties positioning for 2020 elections