texpo_april 2016_final

25
TEXPO April 18, 2016 Jeff Avers SunTrust Bank Director, Corporate Liquidity Specialist Liquidity Management in the New Era Regulatory Update Matthew Roush HollyFrontier Corporation Manager, Cash & Treasury Operations

Upload: matt-roush-ctp

Post on 24-Jan-2017

291 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: TEXPO_April 2016_FINAL

TEXPO April 18, 2016

Jeff Avers SunTrust Bank

Director, Corporate Liquidity Specialist

Liquidity Management in the New Era

Regulatory Update

Matthew Roush HollyFrontier Corporation Manager, Cash & Treasury Operations

Page 2: TEXPO_April 2016_FINAL

2

Regulatory Reform: “Strengthened but not Simplified”

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Page 3: TEXPO_April 2016_FINAL

3

Higher bank interest expense on deposits

Reduced Revenue Streams

Volcker Rule

Potential divestitures

Reduced Fee Income

NSF/Overdrafts (Regulation E)

Debit Interchange (Durbin Amendment)

Increased Balance Sheet Costs

Basel III Capital Ratios

Basel III Liquidity Coverage Ratio

Increased Fees

Uncollateralized daylight overdrafts

FDIC

2a-7 Money Fund Reform

• 2010 Changes

• 2016 Changes

Development costs for new products Employee training

Reduced value of deposits

Reg Q repeal

Basel III - Higher liquidity levels needed to

support the commercial business

Increased cost of compliance & oversight

Human, Systems, tracking and reporting

Increased emphasis on minimizing marginally

profitable and unprofitable relationships

Basel III “non-operating” and FI deposits

Collateralized Deposits

Syndicated Credit Facilities

Increased Bank Expenses Increased Customer Expenses

Regulatory Reform – A Sampling

Page 4: TEXPO_April 2016_FINAL

4

Banks: 2008 – 2012

Fed Funds Target lowered from 4.25% 1Q 2008 to 0-.25% 4Q 2008

Unlimited FDIC Insurance: late 2008 through December 2012

FDIC Coverage raised from $100K to $250K per depositor

Regulation Q Repealed

Money Funds: Implemented 2010

Max Weighted Average Maturity reduced from 90 to 60 days

30% of portfolio must mature within one week and 10% must mature overnight

Max of 2nd tier securities reduced from 5% to 3%

2nd tier issuer limit reduced from 1% to 1/2%

Max maturity of 2nd tier securities reduced from 397 to 45 days

Key Regulatory Changes Impacting Liquidity Management

Page 5: TEXPO_April 2016_FINAL

5

Corporate Cash Has Been Increasing

Grew from $500 Billion in

1988 to more than $2.2

Trillion at the end of 2015

Checkable deposits as a

percent of Corporate Cash

have increased steadily

since 2008 • Relative Value of ECR

• Unlimited FDIC through

12/31/2012

• Declined from 25% in 1988

to 1.9% in 2008 , before

growing to 20% in 2013-15

Trends In Corporate Cash

Source: Federal Reserve Bank

Source: Federal Reserve Bank

Page 6: TEXPO_April 2016_FINAL

6 6

Market Rates for Cash Investment Instruments

Alternative Cash Investment Options

• Rates obtained from (1)

WSJ Money Rates, (2) Crane

Data (money funds) and (3)

State-specific LGIPs

SunTrust Sweep Yields

As of March 2016

Master Note 10 bps

Repo 4 bps

Federated

Prime Fund

8 bps

Federated

Treasury

Fund

4 bps

Market rates continue to remain extremely low

As of late march overnight, 30-day and 90-day rates are at their highest levels in 7+ years, but in-line with those seen since the December 2015 Fed rate hike

• One-month and three-

month Libor are near

their 52-week highs

• US Treasuries, 30-day

CP, Eurodollars, and

money market funds are

all at or near their 52-

week highs as well

Short-term Investment Instrument

Rate as of

7/13/2011*

Rates

11/26/2012

Rates

11/20/2013*

Rates

2/27/2015*

Rates

3/30/2016*

Overnight Instruments

Fed Funds 6 bps 16 bps 12 bps 10 bps 39 bps

Repo 2 bps 29 bps 8 bps 18 bps 48 bps

Bank ECR (Analyzed Business Checking) 35 bps 25 bps 20 bps 15-20 bps 15 -50 bps

Bank Hybrid Analyzed ECR + Interest Checking 25/5 bps 20/5 bps 10-15bps 10-15 bps

30-Day Instruments 11/26/2012 11/20/2013 2/27/2015 3/20/2016

Treasuries 2 bps 15.5 bps 8 bps 1.5 bps 20 bps

Commercial Paper 12 bps 14 bps 7 bps 8 bps 34 bps

Eurodollars 12 bps 12 bps 10 bps 10 bps Not Quoted

Libor 18.7 bps 20.9 bps 16.7 bps 17.2 bps 43 bps

Bank Money Market Account Standard Rate 25 bps 15 bps 12 bps 10 bps 15-20 bps

90-Day Instruments 7/13/2011 11/26/2012 11/20/2013 2/27/2015 3/20/2016

Treasuries 3 bps 10 bps 8 bps 6.5.bps 30 bps

Commercial Paper 15 bps 16 bps 12 bps 14 bps 48 bps

Libor 24.9 bps 31.2 bps 23.8 bps 26.2 bps 63 bps

Eurodollars 15 bps 20 bps 15 bps 15 bps Not Quoted

AAA-Rated Taxable Money Funds: 7-day Yield as of 6/30/2011 10/30/2012 10/31/2013 12/31/2014 2/29/2016

Crane Treasury Institutional MF Index 1 bps 1 bps 1 bps 1 bps 9 bps

Crane AAA Prime Institutional MF Index 4 bps 9 bps 3 bps 2 bps 24 bps

Page 7: TEXPO_April 2016_FINAL

7

Wall Street Journal

December 7, 2014

“Banks are urging some of their largest customers in the U.S. to take their cash elsewhere or be slapped

with fees, citing new regulations that make it onerous for them to hold certain deposits. The banks,

including J.P. Morgan Chase, Citigroup, HSBC Holdings PLC, Deutsche Bank, and Bank of America,

have spoken privately with clients in recent

months to tell them that the new regulations

are making some deposits less profitable,

according to people familiar with the

conversations.

In some cases, the banks have told clients,

which range from large companies to hedge

funds, insurers and smaller banks, that they

will begin charging fees on accounts that

have been free for big customers, the people

said. Bank officials are also working with

these firms to find alternatives for some of

their deposits, they said.”

Banks Urge Clients to Take Cash Elsewhere

Page 8: TEXPO_April 2016_FINAL

8

New & Proposed Regulatory Changes Impacting Liquidity Mgt

Basel III LCR

2a-7 Reform

Reg Q Repeal

Fed Policy

Page 9: TEXPO_April 2016_FINAL

9 www.suntrustrh.com

Implied Probability of a 2016 Rate Hike

Source: Bloomberg

* The implied probability

of a 2016 rate hike has

come down

significantly since the

beginning of January

Probability of a Fed Rate Hike*

By…. 3/29 2/16 1/5

April 0% 9% 56%

Mid-Year 28% 24% 79%

Year-End 63% 45% 92%

Page 10: TEXPO_April 2016_FINAL

10 www.suntrustrh.com

0.0%

1.0%

2.0%

3.0%

4.0%

5.0%

6.0%

7.0%

8.0%

9.0%

1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014 2018

2018

"Long-term"

1994 - 300 bps over 13

1999 - 175 bps over 12

2004 - 425 bps over 25

Fed Projections

2016

2017

The Fed remained on hold at its March meeting

•In March, the FOMC left the Fed Funds target rate at 0.25%-0.50%, noting that while inflation has picked up

in recent months, global economic developments pose a risk to the US economy going forward

– The Fed’s Summary of Economic Projections backed up the Committee’s commitment to a slow and

gradual tightening. The median expectations for the Fed Funds rate at the end of 2016 and 2017

decreased to 0.875% and 1.875%, down 50 bps from their December projections

•Historical tightening cycles show the Fed has tightened on average 22.5 bps per month for at least 12

months. The current 2016 median projections suggest the Fed anticipates four, 25-bp increases next year

The Importance of Recent Fed Commentary

Note: Follows the median of the Fed’s Projections. Implied 3mL forward curve is for approximately four years from start date. Assumes 3mL resets 25 bps above

the Fed Funds Rate (historical average since December 1984)

Source: Bloomberg, Federal Reserve

(a) The central tendency excludes the three highest and three lowest projections for each variable in each year

(b) Longer-run projections for core PCE inflation are not collected

Fed Funds Target Rate with Last Three Tightening Campaigns Projected Fed Funds Rate by FOMC Members vs Forward Curves

0.0%

0.5%

1.0%

1.5%

2.0%

2.5%

3.0%

3.5%

4.0%

4.5%

2016 2017 Longer Run2018

3m LIBOR Forward Curve March FOMC Implied Curve

Page 11: TEXPO_April 2016_FINAL

SEC 2a-7 Money Fund Reform

October 2016 Implementation Net Impact

Net Asset Value

Prime and municipal funds convert to “floating NAV”

- NAV to be calculated to 4 decimal places ($ 1.0000)

Treasury and government funds remain stable NAV

Liquidity Fee

Weekly liquid assets < 30% ► Fund Board may impose a 2%

redemption fee

Weekly liquid assets < 10% ► 1% redemption fee

- Fund Board can determine otherwise

Redemption Gate

Weekly liquid assets < 30% ► Fund Board may suspend redemptions

for up to 10 days

Implemented 2010 Net Impact

Max Weighted Average Maturity reduced from 90 to 60 days

30% of portfolio must mature within one week and 10% must mature

overnight

Max of 2nd tier securities reduced from 5% to 3%

2nd tier issuer limit reduced from 1% to 1/2%

Max maturity of 2nd tier securities reduced from 397 to 45 days

Reduced portfolio credit risk Reduced portfolio liquidity risk Reduced portfolio duration risk

Permanently lowered the yield relative to alternative investment options

Provides a process for money funds to follow when under stress

Empowers the Board to Act

Shifts certain risks from the fund to investors/shareholders

Page 12: TEXPO_April 2016_FINAL

12

Subject to Full LCR Subject to Partial LCR Not Subject to LCR

U.S. Bank Holding

Companies with ≥ $250

billion in total

consolidated assets

U.S. depository

institution holding

companies with ≥ $50

billion in total

consolidated assets

U.S. bank holding

companies (BHC) or

Savings & Loan Holding

Companies (SLHC ) with

< $50 billion in total

consolidated assets

*Includes the top 8 US

Banks ranked by assets as

of 12/31/2015

*Includes the 9th through

35th largest US. banks

ranked by assets as of

12/31/2015

*Includes the remaining

U.S. banks and bank

holding companies

* Source: Federal Reserve Bank Rankings as of December 31, 2015

Basel III Liquidity Coverage Ratio

The LCR requires a banking organization’s stock of unencumbered high-quality liquid

assets (HQLAs) to be at least 100% of its total net cash outflows over a 30-day

standardized supervisory liquidity stress scenario

Per the Securities and Exchange Commission:

Page 13: TEXPO_April 2016_FINAL

13

Parent Company Assets ($B) As of 12/31/2015

Assets

≥ $

250 b

illio

n

1 JPMorgan Chase 1,914

2 Bank of America 1,639

3 Wells Fargo 1,610

4 Citigroup 1,299

5 U.S. Bancorp 417

6 PNC Financial 348

7 Bank of New York

Mellon

319

8 Capital One 273

Assets

≥ $

50 b

illio

n

9 TD Bank US 246

10 State Street 241

11 BB&T 205

12 SunTrust 187

13 HSBC North America 183

14 CHASE Bank (DE) 149

15 Fifth Third 139

16 Morgan Stanley Bank 136

17 Goldman Sachs Bank 134

18 Regions Bank 125

Parent Company Assets ($B) As of 12/31/2015

Assets

≥ $

50 b

illio

n

19 M&T 122

20 Northern Trust 116

21 MUFG Union Bank 115

22 Ally Bank 111

23 Citizens Bank 108

24 BMO Harris 104

25 Capital One 102

26 KeyBank 93

27 Santander USA 90

28 Discover Bank 86

29 Compass/BBVA 85

30 Bank of The West 76

31 Comerica 71

32 Huntington 71

33 Zions BanCorp 59

34 First Republic 59

35 Deutsche Bank 52

Basel III Banks

Source: Federal Reserve Bank as of December 31, 2015

Page 14: TEXPO_April 2016_FINAL

14 PwC

Deposit Runoff Factors

Basel III Liquidity Coverage Ratio: Deposit Behavioral Issues

Stock of Highly

Liquid Assets

Stable

Deposits

(3 -5% Runoff)

Less Stable

Deposits

(10% Runoff)

Wholesale

Operational

(25% Runoff)

Other

Wholesale

Non-Financial

(40% Runoff)

Other

Wholesale

Financial

(100% Runoff)

Under the LCR standard, each

dollar of assumed runoff

requires an offsetting dollar

of liquid asset buffer. Runoff

assumptions will therefore

have a significant impact on

deposit profitability.

14

Retail/Consumer

and

Small Business

Wholesale

Basel III Liquidity Coverage Ratio

Page 15: TEXPO_April 2016_FINAL

Basel III Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR)

I II III

Bank Size (Assets) $250B+ $50-$250B < $50B

Basel III Compliance 100% 70% NA

Operating Deposits 25% 17.5% NA

Non-Operating 40% 28% NA

FSE (FI) Deposits 100% 70% NA

The LCR requires a banking organization’s stock of unencumbered high-quality liquid assets (HQLAs) to be at least 100% of its total net cash outflows over a 30-day standardized supervisory liquidity stress scenario

Page 16: TEXPO_April 2016_FINAL

16

Credit Risk: Depositors have a preferred claim

DIC National Depositor Preference Rule

Order of Settling Claims in the Event of a Bank Failure

1 Administrative Expenses of the Receiver

2 Any Deposit Liability of the Institution • Insured Deposits are settled first, followed by uninsured deposits

• Eurodollar and other offshore deposits are considered a general creditor

obligation

3 Any Subordinated Obligations

4 Any Other General or Senior Liabilities of the Institution

• This includes offshore deposits

5 Any Obligation of Commonly Controlled Depository Institutions for Cross-

Guaranty Assessments Under 12 U.S.C. §1815(e)(2)(C)

6 Any Obligations to Shareholders or Members (including Holding

Companies and their Creditors

Source: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

FDIC National Depositor Preference Rule

Page 17: TEXPO_April 2016_FINAL

17

Credit Risk: Depositors have a preferred claim

DIC National Depositor Preference Rule

Announced by Moody’s on March 17, 2015

Previous

Approach

• Each bank is assigned a single overall long-term rating

• Deposits and other forms of unsecured long-term debt are

considered as part of the bank’s long-term debt structure

New Approach • The bank is not assigned an overall rating

• Individual classes of long-term debt are each assigned their

own rating

• Deposits are given their own unique rating

• Long-term unsecured debt is given it own unique rating

Net Effect Deposits will likely be rated higher than a bank’s unsecured

debt in recognition of the depositor’s preferential claim over

that of general creditors

Source: Moody’s Investors Service

Changes to Moody’s Bank Rating Methodology

Page 18: TEXPO_April 2016_FINAL

18

When Interest Rates Rise, The Repeal of Reg Q1 plus Money Fund Reform

Could Drive Corporate Cash Balances onto Bank Balance Sheets…

Provided the Banks Want the Liquidity

Percent of Total Corporate Liquidity Held in Bank Deposits*

This is a positive outcome

for U.S. banks only if loan

demand and deposit growth

are in synch

*Source: 2010 AFP Liquidity Survey and Treasury Strategies’ Global Liquidity Research

¹ Repealed in 2011, Regulation Q was a 1930s Depression Era regulation that disallowed banks from paying interest on commercial checking accounts

¹

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

USReg Q

FrancePost-Reg

Q

UKNo Reg Q

In countries allowed to pay interest on checking, corporates maintain 60-70% of

their liquidity in the banking system

Impact of Reg Q Repeal

Page 19: TEXPO_April 2016_FINAL

19

Post Reg Q Repeal, the Primary Purpose of Sweep Has Changed

Primary Purpose of Sweep

Old Paradigm Post-Reg Q

Obtain yield on idle cash balances Diversify away from bank risk

Obtain yield in excess of interest-bearing DDA

Predominant Sweep Vehicles

Money Funds

Eurodollar Deposits

Repo

Bank Parent Commercial Paper

Repo (eliminate credit risk)

Money Funds (diversify away from bank risk)

Bank Parent CP (yield enhancement)

Alternative ‘off balance sheet’ products

The Impact of Reg Q Repeal: The Future of Sweep

Source: Treasury Strategies’ proprietary research; Commercial

Deposit/Sweep Study & Global Corporate Liquidity Research

$-

$100

$200

$300

$400

$500

$600

$700

$800

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 YTD

Total U.S. Sweep Balances ($B)

Page 20: TEXPO_April 2016_FINAL

Matthew Roush, CTP Matthew Roush is Manager, Cash & Treasury Operations at HollyFrontier Corporation and Holly Energy Partners He has worked in various Treasury and Credit roles within the company since 2010. Prior to joining HollyFrontier, Matthew served in various Credit roles at both Leggett & Platt, Inc. in Carthage Missouri and Love’s Travel Stops and Country Stores headquartered in Oklahoma City. Matthew earned his Certified Treasury Professional (CTP) credential in January 2015. He graduated from Missouri Southern State University with a BSBA and earned his MBA degree from Missouri State University in Springfield, Missouri. He has been active with the Dallas Association for Financial Professionals since 2013 where he currently serves on the Board. Matthew is based at HollyFrontier’s corporate office located in Dallas, TX.

Page 21: TEXPO_April 2016_FINAL

FOOTPRINT OF HOLLYFRONTIER AND HOLLY ENERGY PARTNERS*

• Pure play inland refining company with 443,000 barrels

• per day of crude capacity

• Proximity to North American crude production and attractive niche product markets

• Collaboration with HEP

provides strategic

growth opportunities in

logistics and marketing

operations

About the HollyFrontier Companies • 443,000 BPD Refining Capacity • 12.2 Nelson Complexity • Approximately 3,000 Pipeline miles

• 75% UNEV ownership • 25% SLC Pipeline ownership • 50% Frontier Pipeline ownership

• 13 million barrels of crude & product storage

• 7 Loading Racks and 10 Terminals

*As of 9/30/2015

Page 22: TEXPO_April 2016_FINAL

Financial Highlights

($ in thousands,) 2015 2014 2013

Revenues $13,236,501 $19,794,327 $20,160,560

Net Income 804,634 723,806 767,823

Cash & Mkt Securities 210,552 1,042,095 1,665,263

Shareholder Equity 5,253,415 5,523,584 5,999,620

- $1 Billion Senior Unsecured Credit Facility

- Investment Grade Ratings: Moody’s Baa3 (Stable Outlook), S&P BBB- (Stable Outlook)

- $250 Million Senior Notes – 10 year 5.875% due 2026 (issued March 2016)

Financial Highlights

($ in thousands,) 2015 2014 2013

Revenues $358,875 $332,545 $305,182

Net Income 137,208 105,525 79,449

Cash & Mkt Securities 15,013 2,830 6,352

Shareholder Equity 383,101 449,821 466,934

- $1.2 Billion Revolving Credit Facility (upsized from $850 million in March 2016)

- Investment Ratings: Moody’s Ba1 (Stable Outlook), S&P BB+ (Stable Outlook)

- $300 Million Senior Notes – 18 year 6.50% due 2020

Page 23: TEXPO_April 2016_FINAL

Treasury Department

Vice President & Treasurer

Manager Cash & Treasury

Operations

Treasury Analyst II

Manager Credit & Collections

Credit Analyst III

Credit Analyst III

Credit Analyst II

Manager Risk Management

Page 24: TEXPO_April 2016_FINAL

Investment

Policy Investment Concerns

-Preservation of Capital

-Need for Daily Liquidity

-Constant NAV required in current IP

SCOPE

-This policy shall apply to Holly Frontier Corporation and all subsidiaries.

-Applies to cash managed in-house and cash with external managers, if any.

- Not applicable for benefit/retirement plan related investments.

OBJECTIVES (in order of priority)

- Safety of principal is foremost.

- Maintain liquidity sufficient to meet company’s projected cash requirements.

- Maximize after-tax return (net of fees) consistent with safety of principal and liquidity objectives.

PARAMETERS

- Permitted Investments

- Credit Quality

- Diversification / Concentration

-Maturity Restrictions

*The investment policy must be reviewed at least annually by the Treasurer and Treasury Manager, updated as appropriate with concurrence by the CFO and approval of the revised policy by the CEO.

Page 25: TEXPO_April 2016_FINAL

25

Summary of Today’s Discussion

SunTrust Bank, Member FDIC. SunTrust is a federally registered service mark of SunTrust Banks, Inc. 04/13

Basel III LCR

2a-7 Reform

Reg Q Repeal

Fed Policy