tex mining company lin€¦ · 99286 to 99289 inclusive and 100437 to 100442 inclusive. the survey...

C-

TEX MINING COMPANY LIN42A11NEM16 63.3965 TULLY

SUITE 15004 KING STREET WESTTORONTO, ONTARIO

M5H 1B6

010

INTEX MINING COMPANY LIMITED FRANKFIELD EXPLORATIONS LIMITED

DIAMOND DRILLING PROGRAMME - 1981TULLY TOWNSHIP PROPERTYPORCUPINE MINING DIVISION, ONTARIO

In 1981, a programme of geophysics and diamond drilling was rconducted over the Tully Township property by Intex Mining Company Limited and Frankfield Explorations Limited.

The 22-claim group is located in Tully Township, approxi mately 25 miles north-northeast of Timmins and is comprised of the following claims: 97938 to 97949, inclusive; 99286 to 99289, inclusive; and 100437 to 100442, inclusive.

The group was staked originally to cover a series of airborne electromagnetic anomalies associated with a band of volcanic flows and tuffs (ranging from rhyolite, andesite and basalt to ultramafics) which extend from the vicinity of the Kidd Creek copper deposit through Prosser Township and into Tully Township.

Originally, the group was staked as a base metal prospect; but, subsequently, diamond drilling of the electromagnetic conductors outlined three gold deposits: the Texmont and Frankfield zones on the Intex property and a similar deposit on the Nickel Offsets property which adjoins to the south.

r A

\ \- 2 -

All three deposits are associated with graphitic sedi ments, basaltic and andesitic flows, in close proximity to ultramafic flows (serpentinite, peridotite) and are located within tuffaceous andesite horizons which host the veins. The veining is associated with a competent, brittle tuffaceous horizon which contacts an incompetent serpentinite. This association is indicated to be through-going as to strike and depth continuity; and further occurrence of gold values could be reasonably expected along strike and at depth anywhere along the zone.

The gold concentrations appear to be localized by north- south faulting; and a south-trending fault in southwest Tully Township may genetically relate these deposits to the Pamour gold producing area 15 miles to the south.

Each of the deposits was discovered as a result of drilling a conductive zone. Heavily disseminated pyrite and arseno pyrite, along with graphitic horizons, account for the conductors.

HISTORY

In 1968-9, Intex Mining Company outlined by diamond drilling, a gold deposit, 500 feet long and 10 feet wide, averaging 0.22 ozs. gold per ton (the Texmont Zone).

Subsequently, Mcintyre Porcupine Mines outlined a deposit of 835,000 tons on the Nickel Offsets property, one mile to the south. Overburden, in excess of 100 feet on the Mcintyre property, apparently deterred underground exploration of their deposit.

Diamond drilling what appeared to be the faulted extension of the Texmont Zone conductor, during 1974-5-6, Intex and Frankfield outlined the Frankfield Zone, 4000 feet east of the Texmont Zone.

- 3 -

Along a 600-foot length, the Frankfield Zone averaged 0.23 ozs. gold per ton over an average core width of 15.5 feet. Significant gold values (0.15 ozs. gold per ton) were intersected on the conductor 600 feet east of the zone outlined by drilling. Overburden on the Frankfield Zone averaged 45 feet,

THE DIAMOND DRILLING PROGRAMME

During the period March to July, 198^;, sixteen holes (4,708 feet) were diamond drilled on the Tully Township property.

The drilling was carried out by Mr. Arthur Dungee of Thunder Bay, Ontario, utilizing AQ wireline equipment. All core was logged by Dr. H. D. Carlson, Consulting Geologist, of Timmins, Ontario. The results of the diamond drilling, as indicated by Carlson 1 s drill logs, will be summarized in this report.

The direct field supervision of the drilling was done by Mr, Philippe Roby of Sermeterre, Quebec. The drill core is stored on the Timmins property of Diepdaume Mines Ltd. All assaying was carried out by Swastika Laboratories of Swastika, Ontario.

The objective of the diamond drilling programme was to explore possible extensions of the Texmont and Frankfield Zones; to further detail the Texmont Zone, checking its upward extensions; and to investigate three separate conductors not associated with either zone.

If the continuity indicated by preliminary surface drilling can be established by detailed diamond drilling of the Texmont and Frankfield Zones, the probable drill indicated reserves would be:

Zone Tons Gold (Ozs/Ton) Width (feet)Texmont 114,000 0.22 10.0 Frankfield 191,000 0.23 14.0

Totals: 305,000 0.226 12.5

- 4 -

A. WESTWARD EXTENSION OF THE TEXMONT ZONE

Holes 81H-1, 81H-2 and 81H-6 were drilled to explore conductors representing possible extensions of the Texmont Zone.

* Hole 81H-1 (297 feet)This hole intersected graphitic material and sulphides

with some minor silicification. The sulphide mineralization is heavy-up to 301 - in some sections. No significant values were intersected.

* Hole 81H-2 (301 feet)This hole intersected graphitic tuffs and sulphide (pyrite)

concentrations up to 50^. No significant values were obtained. The hole terminated in graphitic tuff; and should be extended through this horizon.

* Hole 81H-6 (277 feet)The conductor in this hole was accounted for by heavy

graphite. Silicification at 56 feet and at 70-76 feet should be sampled. No significant values in this hole.

B. DETAILED DRILLING OF UPWARD EXTENSIONS OF THE TEXMONT ZONE

Holes 81H-3, 81H-4, 81H-5, 81H-7 and 81H-8 were bored to check the upward extension of the Texmont Zone indicated by previous diamond drilling,

' Hole 81H-5 (217 feet)The hole intersected considerable silicification in agglo-

meratic andesite tuff. Sulphide mineralization associated with the quartz is minor - of the order of 11. Good gold values were inter sected in this hole.

- 5 -

Footage

84.0 - 92.0129.0 - 134.0

134.5 - 139.5

139.5 - 144.5

144.5 - 150.0

150.0 - 15.6.5175.0 - 180.0

186.0 - 191.0

t Hole 81H-4

Width (Feet)

8.05.05.05.05.56.55.05.0

(207 feet)

Gold (Ozs./Ton)

0.050.220.390.300.320.040.060.12

This hole is. in homogeneous andesite tuff. There is less silicification than in 81H-3, but the silicification is more evenly distributed than in that hole and displays minor visible pyrite.

There is relatively heavy silicification below 165 feet;f

and the hole should be sampled below 165 feet. Values are as follows:

Gold (Ozs./Ton) 0.25 '

0.260.200.080.04

The hole intersected dense andesitic tuff.

Footage Width (Feet) Gold (Ozs./Ton)

206.0 - 211.0 5.0 0.09 223.0 - 229.0 6.0 0.13

Further sampling indicated below 240 feet.

Footage134.0 - 141.0

141.0 -. 145.0

145.0 - 151.0

151.0 - 155.5155.5 - 159.0

159.0 - 163.5

* Hole 81H-5

Width (Feet)7.04.06.04.53.5

4,5

(351 feet)

- 6 -

* Hole 81H-7 (207 feet)In agglomeratic andesite, this hole returned only

low values,Footage Width (Feet) Gold (Ozs./Ton)

131.0 - 137.0 6.0 0.07 137.0 - 143.0 6.0 0.04

' Hole 81H-8 (209 feet)

This hole intersected a sense graphitic horizon; and returned the following values:

Footage . Width (Feet) Gold (Ozs./Ton)95.0 - 102.0 7.0 0.12

125.0 - 132.0 7.0 0.04

C. CONDUCTOR NORTH OF THE TEXMONT ZONE

* Hole 81H-9 (317 feet)In massive, dark green tuff, this hole hit more intensive

silicification than any of the previous holes. Gold values, however, were not significant.

D. EXTENSIONS OF THE FRANKFIELD ZONE

Holes 81H-10 to hlH-14, inclusive, were drilled to investigate possible extensions of the Frankfield Zone. They did little to extend the size of the deposit.

* Hole 81H-10 (346 feet)The hole intersected serpentinite and andesite; and only

minor sulphide mineralization. No gold values.

- 7 -

t Hole 81H-11 (355 feet)This hole intersected a graphitic conductor and heavy

sulphides (SO-75%) from 248-287 feet.

Footage Width (Feet) Gold (Ozs./Ton) 316.0 - 322.5 6.5 . 0.12

This section had S-10% pyrite with minor arsenopyrite.

Hole 81H-12 (327 feet)The hole intersected serpentinite and andesite, with more

silicification in the latter; and some minor gold values. A quartz vein, at 105 feet, should be sampled.

Footage Width (Feet) Gold (Ozs./Ton) 265.0 - 269.0 4.0 0.06

0 Hole 81H-15 (127 feet)No core was recovered; and the hole was abandoned.

* Hole 81H-14 (302 feet)The hole intersected andesite and basalt, mineralized

with minor pyrite and arsenopyrite. Ground core at 244,5 - 257.0 feet indicates faulting.

Quartz veins at 103.0 - 124,0 feet and 220.0 - 224.0 feet should be sampled.

E. EAST ANOMALY

Hole 81H-15 (406 feet) was drilled to check this anomaly in the northeast corner of the claim group, southeast of the Frankfield Zone. It cut a mafic to ultramafic flow characterized by talc, chlorite and serpentine alteration. No gold mineralization was encountered.

- 8 -

F. ANOMALY IN SOUTH SECTOR OF CLAIM 99286

Hole 81H-16 (464 feet) was drilled to investigate an extensive vertical loop electromagnetic anomaly. The hole intersected a graphitic conductor and followed along the contact of the volcanics and a diabase dike. There were 44 feet of lost core. No gold values were encountered.

CONCLUSIONS;

The drilling programme established the upward extension of the Texmont Zone. Further sampling is indicated for the drill core on the Frankfield Zone. On this Zone also, the following gaps should be investigated by drilling:

1) Between Holes 75TF-13 and 81H-14;2) Between Holes 75TF-9 and 76IF-19;3) Between Holes 76IF-19 and 82H-10;4) Between Holes 82H-11 and 82H-12.

Respectfully submi

H. A. Pearson,

June 28, 1982

- 3 -

Terms of Reference

This survey was carried out by agreement with Intex Mining Company Limited and Frankfield Explorations Limited. The area surveyed covered the complete area of the 22 claim group known as claim numbers 97938 to 97949 inclusive, 99286 to 99289 inclusive and 100437 to 100442 inclusive. The survey was carried out on north-south lines spaced 400 feet apart with a control base line known as base line B located on the concession line between concessions 2 and 3. Sub-control base line known as base line C was established south of the Frankfield zone for prepared control. Inter mediate lines spaced 200 feet apart were employed over the Frankfield zone, the Texmont zone and the zone immediately west of the Texmorit zone.

The survey was carried out under the direct field supervision of Mr. Philippe Roby of Senneterre, Quebec and Mr. Paul Perrault of Senneterre, Quebec.

The total mileage surveyed was approximately 26 line milesand the total mileage line cut was approximately 29 line miles.

The drilling was carried out by Mr. Arthur Dungee of Thunder Bay, Ontario, utilizing AQ wireline equipment and consisted of sixteen holes indicated as H-1 to H-16 inclusive on the accompanying map.

All core was logged by Dr. H.D. Carlson, Consulting Geologist, of Timmins, Ontario.

The direct field supervision of the drilling was done by Mr. Philippe Roby of Senneterre, Quebec. The total footage drilled was 4,708 feet.

All assaying was carried out by Swastika Laboratories of Swastika, Ontario.

Methods Used and Presentation of Results

Electromagnetic Survey

The Electromagnetic Survey employed the Sheridan-Kelk Dual Frequency Magniphase Electromagnetic Instrument operated in the horizontal coil configuration with a transmitter-receiver separation of 200 feet. In general, readings of amplitude and phase of the resultant field at the high frequency (2400 cps) were recorded at station intervals of 100 feet.

The results of the survey, as plotted on the accompanying map, show only the profile of the high frequency phase.

In general, in'areas considered of interest, the static interval was reduced to 50 feet.

Discussion of Geophysical Results

In general, a series of conductors were indicated on the property, two of which coincided with the Texmont and Frankfield zones. In addition, the survey revealed that both zones of conductivity extended westerly from the known mineralization. In both cases, areas of extensive widths of sulphide mineralization were found to extend the anomalies. Unfortunately, these zones of sulphide mineralization were non-gold bearing.

It is the opinion of the writer that even though conductive zones are found immediately over the Texmont and Frankfield zones, the gold mineralization is probably not directly associated with the features giving rise to the conductors but is associated with some subsidiary effect in which stripping and underground work confirms. This hypothesis will remain in theory only. The second theory that: may possibly explain the results is that there are two chances of sulphide mineralization both of which have been implaced in the same structures. One is barren sul phides and the other is gold bearing.

Conclusions

The work to date has indicated that the Texmont zone, whatever its form, comes through to the sub-surface and at least in the area of Hole H-3, expands in width and grade. It is very easy to make a case for the Texmont representing a simple structure, however, the writer believes that this will not turn out to be the case and that the intersections obtained in this drill and in the previous programmes on the Texmont zone will prove to be a series of ore shoots which will be controlled by some different structure yet to be determined. The intersections in hole H-4 although looking identical to the intersections in hole H-3 and being of similar grade of width are unexplainable by the simple ore zone theory,

Recommendations

It is recommended that the area immediately over the surface projection of the Texmont zone be stripped and the zone examined and sampled in detail on the surface including, if possible and practical, the shipment of a bulk sample from the surface of the zone as exposed. It is quite probable that after the stripping is complete, a new picture of the ore structure will unfold.

All of which is respectfully submitted.

J.P. Sheridan, P.Eng,

JPS/j1m

OFFIC RES.:

3-4477 -7566

•*2A11NEeei6 63.3965 TULLY020

0. 1^. ^nerlaan, P . ENG.

MINING GEOPHYSICIST

December 11, 1981

The President and DirectorsIntex Mining Company LimitedSuite 15004 King Street, WestTORONTO, Ontario.M5H 1B6

The President and Directors Frankfield Explorations Limited 27 Queen Street, East Suite 402TORONTO, Ontario. M5C 2M6

REPORT - Geophysical Exploration Programme and Follow-Up Diamond Drilling Programme Tully Township Property

. . . . . . . Porcupine. Mining. Division,, Ontario..

During the months of February and March, 1981 an Electromagnetic Survey was carried out on your Tully Township property located in the Porcupine Mining Division of Ontario,

This programme was followed up by an approximate 4,708 foot diamond drilling programme consisting of sixteen diamond drill holes c

These holes were designed primarily to explore for extensions of the Texmont zone,to test for extensions of the Frankfield zone and to explore three separate conductors not associated with either zone. In addition, five drill holes were used to further outline the Texmont zone and to prove the upward con tinuation of the zone to the sub-surface as a prelude to the further development of the Texmont zone.

Summary of Results of the Exploration Programme,

The Electromagnetic Survey revealed several obvious extensions of the structure associated with the Texmont zone. These exten sions were tested by Holes H-l, H-2 and H-6. These holes reveal ed a very large wide zone of sulphide mineralization which unfortunately proved to be barren. Two obvious extensions of the Frankfield zone were indicated to the west of the known ore structure. These zones were tested by Holes H-10, H-ll and H-12. H-10 and H-ll likewise intersected extensive sulphide mineraliza tion which proved to be barren. H-15 was drilled to test a large E.M. anomaly representing an conductive zone located on our eastern boundary. The structure was found to satisfactorily expand the anomaly but unfortunately, was barren of any significant gold mineralization. Hole H-9 was drilled to test a conductor occuring north of the Texmont zone. It likewise satisfactorily expand the anomaly but was not gold bearing. Hole H-16 was drilled on the southern portion of Claim number 99286 to test a large regional E.M. anomaly previously found with a Vertical Loop Survey and which was slightly indicated by our current survey. No extension .for the anomaly was found in. the drill hole, fl.p.|e^IIM:P^wpiCi^^ H-7 and H-8 intersected what it is believed to be the upward extension of the Texmont zone and showed ore grade mineralization with Hole H-3 revealing the widest widths of good grade ore found to date on the property,

Property. Location.....

Departure.__

DIAMOND DRILL RECORDDip

Hole No. .L-L-Sheet No..-......L

Total Footage___..

Elev. Collar...........Datum.____ Date Started......Date Completed. Drilled by__. Logged by.....^.^.

^-uta.-4Al-———^~_

Date of Examination___.__....

Property.. Location_....

Latitude............^Departure.__.


Hole No.. Sheet No..-..fcs-~~.

Total Footage._

Elev. Collar.......Datum. ___ .. Date Started.....Date Complete Drilled by. Logged by..

...lX.cup~~...J ID.

Date of Examination._____..

Property..^..)'! Location....


Hole No.i-i-

Departure... __ 2j3..a.l~- .tsJ.

Elev. Collar Datum.

Drilled by. Logged by

Total Footage___..

Sheet No.l..-.....-*/-....-.

Footage

From To n -Formation Sample

NumberSample Footage

Sample Width

Gold Sample

Gold Sludge

Remarks

-r-,—f——hw / -Y/.a ~ v Xa -A

o-oo^

l" ^ ^7-1jp..oo.-a..

C ^O /o -^O /e /Q^J A.TP ^1^ j,' ii/S-.f,

C\ \

r/ -^f.______/i N^ Xl^^/vL . v

~*~*-y

Date of Examination.___

Location.... .....

Departure. __ .


Hole No... Sheet No..

Total Footage.

Elev. Collar........Datum...__-... Date Started........Date Completed.. Drilled by.__. Logged by.

Date of Examination..__..

Property.,^ Location._

Departure.__ST-j Bearing.


Hole No... Sheet

Elev. Collar.....Datum........Date Started.. ..tX*^—\rL.--.......

Total Footage..^

Drilled by. Logged by.

Date of Examination._

Property... Location.,..

Latitude......^_.±:.....o..cx...5..Departure.__!L Bearing..


Hole No. JL — L ~ Sheet No....JcT...

Elev. Collar..............._..........___Datum.___™.-....—.—.._—L—-—_i..DateStarted.......JuW^....-X3.......|...8,X:.

Total Footage.___..

Drilled by., Logged by......

Sample Number

Sample Footage

Sample Width

Gold Sample

Gold Sludge Remarks

/In i-,

Date of Examinatioru...JLL1

Location.^.

Departure__V.....

.J......


Hole No../ Sheet No_/..l

Total Footage..

Elev. Collar.......Datum...__. Date DateDrilled by Logged by.,..

l.

Date of Examination..

Property. Location..,

Latitude._b Departure_V


Hole No..g-/-

Sheet No-..

Efev. Collar.. Datum.

Total Footage.___..

Date Completed . Drilled by. __ .Logged by....

FootageFrom To Formation Sample


Sample Width

Gold Sample

Gold Sludge Remarks232

f —*u

j ~h~~ / ifijfait sbttAAx s&L&dk J

f 0 ———^f .j

Date of Examination.__...,.

Property, Location. urn*Latitude.-..A.....:t Departure..._L..i


Hole Sheet NOS-

Total Footage___

Elev. Coljar Datum...__ Date DateDrilled by Logged by.....

Location. MO,

Departure. Bearing...


Hole No. ./..tl-iL" JV Sheet No _ .. __ ~...

Elev. Collar Datum. _

Total Footage.__

Date Completed..-..-..tX. Drilled by.-- Logged by.^.

Date of Examination.____.ra

Property.^.*-; Locatioa...


Hole No.. Sheet No... J?JL-

Latitude._-

Total Footage.——

Elev. Collar.........Datum... ___ . Date Started Date Completed . Drilled by. Logged by........

g-\ 4 ^A

FootageFrom To Formation

sTfiTSample Number

Sample Footage

Sample Width

Gold Sample

Gold Sludge Remarks

tt5 /- 5' ' .

*-/ — K A rt

z a*

//III

Date of Examination...

Property.. Location..


Hole No..

Bearing. Total Footage^——..

Elev. Collar........Datum...__m Date Started.....Date Completed Drilled by Logged by.,..

Sheet No..

FootageFormation

/; rtf-5'. w -t5.Q\ fe^'; fe7^T~7#0;

Sample Number

Sample Footage

Sample Width

Gold Sample

Gold Sludge Remarks

Date of Examination.__.

Property... X...


Hole No..-/..—:

Departure... ...^Bearing. __ x

1- ±r...QCx.....lS)— _ —Total Footage.___..

Elev. Collar.-..-.-. Datum.___-^.. Date Started.........Date Completed... Drilled by.__.. Logged by.__.

Sheet No......

FootageFrom To

Formation Sample Number

Sample Footage

Sample Width

Gold Sample

Gold Sludge Remarks

.7

^.S'.

P07,d ^

—^ *ffi

TO ^ , A!// Jet. 17 ^^ 5 z 7

Date of Fjtamination._L^

Property.....; Location....

Departure.__


Hole No.. Sheet No__l.____

Elev. Collar......Datum...__.-. Date Started.......Date Completed. Drilled by.. Logged

Total Footage...

Date of Examination..—..-

Property.-M.r^..J!.l.J-?...S,

'jLJL.


Hole No. .L~...5..r:...3J Sheet No

Latitude.__.12}.......*Departure.__....'Sr..4.......c?.

Elev. Collar.. Datum.

Drilled by. Logged by....

Total Footage.___..

Property..- Location...


Hole No.. Sheet No..........(.___

Departure__2_..-A.......QO-..IOBearing.__

•LM.,. frka, j

Date of Examination^

DIAMOND DRILL RECORD Hole No..

Property...-^: Location..

Dip

Departure...

Elev. Collar.........Datum.___....Date Started.......Date Completed.. Drilled by..__. Logged by...._..

Total Footage._

Sheet No....

Date of Examination.......^

i__

- -

Property Location.


Hole No.

Total Footage.___.......

Elev. Collar..........Datum.___......Date Started.........Date Completed... Drilled by.__.. Logged by.,.__.

Sheet

FootageFrom

Formation

,/ sp/ . 1 1 — 4TCte 'd -

Sample Number

Sample Footage

Sample Width

Gold Sample

Gold Sludge Remarks

l____,— f f———vs /v. ^ a yA j^

Property.... Location.

Departure. Bearing,


Hole No. Sheet No... f


LZIJ^ j^xIlM~ .......jlA Zlim........

Total Footage.......

Drilled by.-..^.... Logged by

FootageFrom To


Sample Footage

Sample Width

Gold Sample

Gold Sludge Remarks

4L 11 A. d-//Z ^^4-/r fi ' ;j fl/Ai Jff/s/iy^ A/yAt3f a /}//}? Vtftlf/j/t

. . -- /v 7 >i- ''

fc•4.^ J j? d 52 V0;\

2^:

Date of Examination.__1.....

Property.^ Location..


Hole No.. jL1.Z....-..?i./ Sheet No

Departure._f Bearing.__tJ- Total Footage.___....

Elev. Collar..........Datum.___......Date Started.........Date Completed... Drilled by..__. Logged by.__..

Date of Examination___..........

Property.. Location...


Hole No../- 7-,

Sheet No..

Departure.

Bev. Collar.......^.Datum.___.— Date Started........Date Completed... Drilled by___.. Logged by. ...~.~...Total Footage.__



Sample Width

Gold Sample

Gold Sludge Remarks

—T^3/—, //o*&A4l O P (J s^ v X \ /.-eX^^fo.. (^6/^^77

rr7Date of Examination...

'y


Hole Na.jL^sL-....e.L Sheet No.. JL—Property .jL..Z?...U-lS. X

Elev. Collar Datum. Date Started.

Departure_^ Bearing._!

Property..-!-.)'!


Hole No/ ~. Sheet No.......

Total Footage.-^

Elev. Collar.... Datum.___ Date Started.- Date Complete Drilled by.. Logged by....

Date of Examination._f—.if.


ut-


Hole Na/ZL-^LJs-L/ Sheet

Y—

Elev. Collar.........Datum.___....Date Started.....Date Completed Drilled by.. Logged by.

Total Footage.___....

Date of Examination. .Y.


^T}


Hole No. Sheet No..

JJJL.

Departure._LW.. Bearing._JTp.^

r

J*L

Elev. Collar. Datum.___™... Date Started.- Date Completed.........Drilled by...

Total Footage.——...

FootageFrom To

Formation-f^-

Sample Number

Sample Footage

Sample Width

Gold Sample

Gold Sludge Remarks

tt^

C r 3/x^/K c^Ay^;

Date of Examination._L

Property. Location..

Departure...__.....T}


Hole No.. Sheet No-.

•^/Y7 O

t

Total Footage._.

Elev. Collar. Datum.

Date Completed. Drilled by. __ ,. Logged by.

Date of Examination...

Property..

Departure... __ .™nx— '^r— a.c?.


Hole No...


Total Footage.___™..

Drilled by. Logged by....

Sheet No..

FootageFrom Formation

Q B______^ foL^tJ, XmA*

. . X

Sample Number

Sample Footage

Sample Width

Gold Sample

Gold Sludge Remarks

^fzy-i

iM ^.., 3rYT^

^m,Date of Examination._L..

Property.. Location_

ex.U. .W.'p-


Hole No/ Sheet No.

Total Footage...

Elev. Collar...........Datum...__™... Date Started.......Date Completed— Drilled by--—-

Date of Examination.___.....

DIAMOND DRILL RECORD Hole No.J Sheet No_J.

Property.. Location

Departure._.^T- Bearing.,__3b-r.:

DipElev. Collar.........Datum.


Total Footage..^—.-.

FootageFrom To

Formation

AaMJ^^ ^ W&)

Sample Number

Sample Footage

Sample Width

Gold Sample

Gold Sludge Remarks

Date of Examination..™...

DIAMOND DRILL RECORD Hole No..../..... Sheet No.......3...-..--

Property.... Location..

Dip

Total Footage..

Elev. Collar.........Datum.___..-.. Date Started.........Date Completed... Drilled by.__.. Logged by.-.._.

Date of Examination.___

Property Location...

Departure._f3;......^.jfc;...


Hole No.,/-.: Sheet No..


Total Footage.__


X)

Date of Examination.___.......



Hole No.

Latitude......^r.....V—-O.fc.-t:Departure...-':i:-....:4:....G.Cx....S.Bearing._IXsr.i..1! Total Footage..

Elev. Collar....Datum.___.—. Date Started......Date Completed Drilled by........Logged by.__

Sheet No..

FootageFrom To

Formation y*

Sample Number

Sample Footage

Sample Width

Gold Sample

Gold Sludge Remarks

Date of Examination..™..-

Property- Location.....


Hole No..

sLatitude. Departure.__1

Elev. Collar.......Datum. ___ ,.

Total Footage...

Date Completed.. Drilled by. __ . Logged by...........

Sheet NO........L—


Sample Footage

Sample Width

Gold Sample

Gold Sludge Remarks

TIT

iA - Hn l H

Date of Examination.____.

Property.. Location_

LL

Departure...__~ Bearing.__H?..


Hole No.^."* Sheet

'

Total Footage.____..

Elev. Collar... Datum. Date Started Date Comple Drilled by. Logged by.

- ___ _ ..V. ( a\ ST.-.-../ -8.X.-..........-.

Date of Examination^..


Departure ___ J5T.fi>........!::>..


Hole No../.—

Total Footage......^.

Elev. Collar.............Datum.____.^ Date Started........-.Date Completed..-. Drilled by........Logged by....

Sheet

Date of Examination.___.-...

Property.^J^..)XS...Sr..X-.Location..

Departure._.'Z-.—Jc:.5rc*.. Bearing...__.....n.r^L.vV.eJ


Hole No., Start NoL-j——

Total Footage..

Elev. Collar...........Datum.___.-.. Date Started.........Date Completed... Drilled by........Logged by............

Date of Examination....

DIAMOND DRILL RECORD Hole No.. Sheet No...-./..- Dip

Location.

Departure. __ ..

Elev. Collar..-^. Datum. ___ .—

Total Footage..^.

Drilled by Logged by.....

FootageFrom To


Sample Footage

Sample Width

Gold Sample

Gold Sludge Remarks

?fl. -

^rV^•Vi—5v

C 7 fimll^.Q :~p x /

rt K fe ft A/ /. J&L&J, ~j- A 4(.g ./w/II

"^ ??^

. -f- .^ hJL L A

/l *dA- Q TT ~?\ s Aty frf /Xg ; - -x- .\ J i /?.o C r/./;

BuJ

Date of Examination._

DIAMOND DRILL RECORD Hole No.. Sheet NO. jL—Dip

Location.,.^

Latitude............Departure.m...Bearing.__..

Elev. Collar........Datum.___... Date Started......Date Completed Drilled by. Logged by

Total Footage.___..

Date of Examination.,,.

Property. Location.....

Latitude....__.. Departure__.. Bearing......_......


Hole No./71/AeL.-J?-/ Sheet No......^.....

Elev. Collar.........Datum.___.....Date Started.......Date Completed.. Drilled by....-...Logged by...._.

Total Footage.____.

FootageFrom


Sample Footage

Sample Width

Gold Sample

Gold Sludge Remarks

no , oWxvXJtiWtK^6.6

n ;zE

tv^P Ar

Date of Examination.____

Property..

Latitude...._......Departure.__.. Bearing.___..


Hole No..

Total Footage..—^.

Elev. Collar.........Datum.__..m. Date Started........Date Completed.. Drilled by......—..Logged by.....—...

Sheet No.-JL———



Sample Width

Gold Sample

Gold Sludge Remarks

.-t..-.

rfcz- -#-

Jl

0

H 2 ."* . ^O"*?"{-*-A

afcDate of Examination...™...,

SWASTIKA LABORATURIES LIMITEDP.O. BOX 10, SWASTIKA, ONTARIO POK 1TO

TELEPHONE: (705) 642-3244 ANALYTICAL CHEMISTS * ASSAYERS * CONSULTANTS

Gkrtifirat? nf Atwlpia

Certificate No. 51099 Date: March 24 1981

Received Mar.23/81_____ ___6

Submitted by Intex Mining, Toronto. Ontario

Samples of Split Core

Per: Mr. P. Robv

SAMPLE NO.

123456

GOLD Oz;Aton

0.0020.002NilNilNilNil

G. Lebel - ManagerESTABLISHED 1 928

SWASTIKA LABORATORIES LIMITEDP.O. BOX 10, SWASTIKA, ONTARIO POK 1TO


(Erriifirat* of Attalgaia:SL.i.,.,,.,.,: i.? ,,r,: ^ ^-.

Certificate No. 51122______________ Date: March 30. 19&L......^.^

ReceivedMarch 25. 19&L 3 Samples of split core,—..-—^.^.....^.—.,—.

Submitted by Intex Mining Limited. Toronto. Ontario At t: J. P. Sheridan

SAMPLE NO. GOLD

7 0.002'

g NIL

9 0.002

G. Lebel, Manager ESTABLISHED 1928

Certificate No. 5 1160


TELEPHONE: (705) 642-3244 ANALYTICAL CHEMISTS * ASSAYERS* CONSULTANTS

(Utriifirat* of Attalpiaft&CEfVFo AP#

Date: April 6. 1981

ReceivedMarch 30. 1981 11

Submitted by Intex Mining Limited,

Samples of split core

Toronto, Ontario Att: J. P. Sheridan

SAMPLE NO. GOLD Oz./ton

HOLE #2

10

11

12

1314151617181920

NIL

NIL

NIL

NIL

NIL

NIL

NIL

0.005

NIL

NIL

NIL

/IT,

Per.G. Lebel, Manager

ESTABLISHED 1 928

SWASTIKA LIMITEDP.O. BOX 10, SWASTIKA, ONTARIO POK 1TO

TELEPHONE: (705) 642-3244 ANALYTICAL CHEMISTS *ASSAYERS* CONSULTANTS

Qkrtiftrat* of Atralpte

Certificate No. 51177

Received April 1 . 19&L 7

Submitted by Int ex Mining, Toronto,*

SAMPLE NO.

21

22

2324

25

26

27

Date: April 7, 19&L


Ontario Att: J, P. Sheridan

GOLD Oz./ton

NIL

0.05

0.005

0.22

0.39

0.30

0.32

Per. 13. Lebel, Manager

ESTABLISHED 1928



Gfcrtifirat? of Atmlpte

Certificate No. 5*1177~A

ReceivedA l

Date: April 10, 19&1

Samples of split,

Submitted by Tntey Mining Li^it-ecl— -j. j. A ^. . -ru —— i--^ j -u i-i —— - -x

On t. a r i n

Att: J.P. Sheridan

SAMPLE NO.

24

25

26

27

SILVER Oz./ton

0.01

0.01

trace

0.01

Per. G. Lebel, Manager

ESTABLISHED 1928

Sil SWASTIKA LABORATORIES LIMITEDP.O. BOX 10, SWASTIKA, ONTARIO POK 1TO


Qkrtifirat* nf Analpia

Certificate No. 51183 Date: April 9, 19&L

Received April 2. 19dl 7

Submitted bv Intex Mining Limited,

SAMPUL NO

HOLE #4

28

29

30

3132

33

34

Samoles of split core

Toronto, Ontario

GOLD Oz.7ton

0.002

NIL

0.002

0.25

0.26

0.20

0.04

ESTABLISHED 1928G. Lebel, Manager



fikrttfirat? nf AttalpiH

Certificate No. 51204 Date: April 13.

Received April 7, 19&1 #

Submitted by Tnt.pv Mining T, i mj-hfir^

SAMPLE

HOIE #5

3536

37

3^

3940

41

42


Tn-rnnt.n On-hftrn n

Att: J'. P. Sheridan

\

NO. GOLD Oz./ton

NIL

0.002

NIL

0.002

0.09

0.03

0.13

0.002

G. Lebel, ManagerESTABLISHED 1928



(Enliflrat? of Atmlpf0 p 5


Received April 8. 1981

Date: April 15. 19&L

Samples of split core^^^^^^^^Submitted by Intex Mining Limited. Toronto. Ontario

SAMPLE NO.

HOLE, #3

43

44

GOLD Oz./ton

0,04

0.02

Per. GT Lebel, ManagerESTABLISHED 1 928



Qkrtfffrat* af Analpia

Certificate No. : .51223

Received April 10. 19&L

Date: April 20. 1961

Samples of split c ore—————...—-.

Submitted by Intex Mining Limited, ^pronto, Ontario Att: J.P. Sheridan

SAMPLE NO.

HOLE

45

46

HOLE #4

47

4^

49

HOLE #5

50

GOLD Oz./ton

0.06

0.12

0.12

O.Og

0.005

0.03

G. Lebel, ManagerESTABLISHED 1 928


TELEPHONE: (705)642-3244 ANALYTICAL CHEMISTS *ASSAYERS* CONSULTANTS

of

Certificate No. Date: April 23,

15 Samples of split coreReceived A pril 14, 19&1 _

Submitted by Intex Mining Limited. Toronto. Ontario Per: P. Robv

SAMPLE NO,

H PIE #6

515253545556575359606162636465

GOLD Oz./ton

0.0020.002NIL0.0020.0020.0020.0020.002NILNILNILNILNILNILNIL

Per.GTLebel, Man

try ESTABLISHED 1928



(brtifirat* of


Received April 16, 193l

Date: A pril 24, 1931

Samples of a pi j t. rnr-e.——————-——

Submitted by Intex Mining Li mi t.p.d r Tnrrmt.n, A-ht. : .T . P . Han

f;

V

SAMPLE NO.

HOLE # 5

GOLD

66 6?

HOLE #1

63 6v 69

707172737475767773

HOLE #8

79 BOdi

36

0.0020.002

NILNILNILNIL0.0050.0050.070.040.005NIL0.02

NIL0.0020.0050.120.04NIL0,050.002

IST.JBL-

Per.

ESTABLISHED 1 928

G. Lebeli——L*L ., Manajager



nf Attalpi0

Certificate No. 51281______________ Date: April 29, 1981-

Received Apr.24.. 1981 __g____ Samples of split core-————--—.

Submitted by Intex Mining Limited. Toronto. Ontario____Per: P. ROBY

SAMPLE NO. GOLDOz./ton

HOLE #9

87

88

89

90

91

92

93

94

NIL

NIL

0.002

NIL

NIL

NIL

NIL

NIL

Per. G. Lebel, Manage

ESTABLISHED 1928



Qforttfirat* of AtutlplH


Received Mav 1/81

Date: May 6 1981

Samples of Split Core

Submitted by Tntex Mining Limited. Toronto. Ontario

SAMPLE NO.

Hole #7

9596

; .,97

Hole #89899

100

GOLD Oz./ton

0.01NilNil

Nil Nil Nil

ESTABLISHED 1928G. Lebel - Manager

SI* SWASTIKA LABORATURIES LIMITEDP.O. BOX 10, SWASTIKA, ONTARIO POK 1TO


Qkrtiftrate of Analyaia

Certificate No. 51 508 Date: June 8 1981

J5 Samples ofReceived June 3/81____ —.

Submitted by Intex Mining Limited. Toronto. Ontario

Spl l1.

SAMPLE NO.

101102103104105106107108109110m112113114115

GOLD Oz./ton

NilNilNilNilNilNilNilNilNilNilNilNilNilNil0.12

irr. *-*

Per.G. Lebel - Manager

ESTABLISHED 1928



dbrttftait*


Received June B , 19 31 Samples of

Date: June 11. 19&L

split c ore —^—.———

Submitted by Intex Mining Limited, Toronto, Ontario Per: P. Roby

SAMPLE NO.

116

117

GO z.

NIL

0.002

G. Lebel, Managertry ESTABLISHED 1 928

SWASTIKA LIMITEDP.O. BOX 10, SWASTIKA, ONTARIO POK 1TO

TELEPHONE: (705) 642-3244 ANALYTICAL CHEMISTS* ASSAYERS* CONSULTANTS

Oferttftait* of


Received June 17. 1981

Date: June 25. 1981


Submitted by Intex Mining Limited, Toronto, Ontario

A.tt: J.P. Sheridan

SAMPLE NO.

118

119

120

GOLD Oz./ton

NIL

NIL

0.06

1311

Per. u. Lebel, Jvranage

ESTABLISHED 1 928



Gkrtiffr at* nf Attalpte

Certificate No. 51745 Date: July 7. 1981Received June 26. 1981 7

Submitted bv Intex Mining Limited.

SAMPLE NO.

121

122

123124 '125126

127


Toronto, Ontario Att: J. P. Sheridan

GOLD Oz./ton

NIL

NIL

NIL

0.01

0.002 ^Q

0.005

0.002

Per. G. Lebel, ManagerESTABLISHED 1 928

SWASTIKA LABORATORIES LIMITEDP.O. BOX 10, SWASTIKA, ONTARIO POK 1 TO

TELEPHONE: (705) 642-3244 ANALYTICAL CHEMISTS *ASSAYERS* CONSULTANTS

Certificate No. 52457______-______ Date: .September 29 1981

Received Sept. 25/81 _2_____ Samples of Ore——————.^———

Submitted by Intex Mining Limited, Toronto, Ontario Att'n: Mr. J.P. Sheridan

SAMPLE NO. GOLD Oz./ton

TULLEY TWP.1101 0.04

1102 0.08

\JPG. Lebel - Onager v

ESTABLISHED 1 928


TELEPHONE; (705) 642-3244 ANALYTICAL CHEMISTS * ASSAYERS * CONSULTANTS

Okrtifirat* of

Certificate No. 526/13

Received Oct. 26, 1981 10

Submitted by Intex Mining Limited.

SAMPLE NO.

1

2

3

4

5 6

78

910

Date: Oct. 29, 1981

Samples of ore

Toronto, Ontario Per: P. Robv

GOLD Oz./ton

0.002

NIL

0 . 24 l

0.26 t

0.002

0.30 1

0.002

NIL

NIL

NIL

Per.G. Lebel, Manage

ESTABLISHED 1 928

Si

PRO

SSER

Tp.

M

. 571

ro

iîi^P

Hp^

^4?^^-^

?-^

--.- -

.•'•F

-- v-

'^-ic,

l-

. j

r--"

- '

5,r s

'-.^5

.Â

-y™

w *

—-^

LX

--1D

I ,*

-'

,'

Ol

. -:

•SB'

'to

?-

S-v-

.-".{4

-'-V-

'î

^:S

i^"I

,:^*:k^îM

^

H

L l N E B orsic. 5 n

, -i ' : - o5^fcT" ' ,;^--.'Sr ' . YW&,:- ±:^.te: ..: \

A \

Cone. 3

M N NG COMPANY LTD.l N TE X

200 CABLE - M SURVEY

PHASE - 180B.G. AMP - 195

SCALE - 1 .^ 2 O Q

r = 1 00 units

Cone. :

PLANCLAIM

l Star

MAGNIPHASE E -M SURVEY AND DRILL HOLES

INTEX MINING COMPANY LIMITED PROPERTY

TULLY TWP. PROPERTY

PORCUPINE MINING DIVISION

ONTARIO

by J P SHERIDAN P ENG

OCT. 26, 1981

tex mining company lin€¦ · 99286 to 99289 inclusive and 100437 to 100442 inclusive. the survey...

Documents